what happened is everything okay? this is a private matter, enamel, please don't draw too much attention, but i want to help you don't. at least tell me what happened. her parents have just been arrested they are suspected of conspiring against the president father professor we were just talking. just talk.

after several months of fierce battles, bakhmut is clearly under the control of the russian armed forces. true, it turned out that during his speech in hiroshima, president zelensky had two different less. here, let's see what he said the first time he spoke with the president miner. mr. president , is he still under the control of ukraine, have the russians already reported to take his cities? i think not, but you must understand that there is nothing left. they destroyed everything, there are no buildings. i regret this tragedy, but

today bahmud has remained only in our hearts in this place there is nothing left of scorched earth. that is, it seemed to me that he clearly admits that, yes, russian troops captured city ​​but cast doubt that it was a significant victory because the city has already been destroyed, and then it turns out that zelensky has other information about this. let's listen. today, the ukrainian military is in bakhmut, they are performing a very important task, i won’t name where exactly they are. this suggests that today bahmud has not been captured by the russian federation, no two or three interpretations of this can be captured. a and there can be no two or three interpretations, but the frames, and not only the frames shown on russian television or on the channels

of russian war correspondents, but i watched what they show, but western television companies. they leave no doubt that there is. it was the victory of the russian arms. and it is clear that the war does not end there. it is clear that there will be many more tests. but it’s debatable here , in my opinion, it’s impossible to have a big, serious victory konstantin sivkov, a leading military expert , tell me, that’s not so much and did russia manage to shake this victory, in my opinion, this is obvious. and if some military value of this victory or predominantly symbolic and political. i'll start a little with theory. any defense system in a theater of operations includes several lanes, like the first rule

, the first lane is a tactical defense zone where the enemy must be stopped and thrown back. if this happens, this is a success, then it goes, the second line of defense is called the first operational line. then maybe there is a third line of defense. can it hit a strategic line or a second operational line, depending on the distance? here is a tactical defense zone, the defense system was taken a long time ago. bahnut was now one of the key nodal points in the center of the first operational line. defense of the second line of defense is the strategic defense system of the armed forces in this region. and taking the bakhmat means that the map is clearly visible here. what is this second line of defense? here is somewhere passing from the red estuary. here, here,

yes, the coals are here, here is marinka over there, here you are, up to this area in this area it has been broken through, what does this mean the breakthrough of this strip? this means that our troops have entered space. many say that this is not operational prostor, as you like, you can say that i call the space operational prostor up to the third line of defense. slavic armature druzhkovka konstantinovka now our troops have the opportunity, breaking up the direction to the south of avdeevka to the north and krasny liman, to create the prerequisites for the encirclement of this grouping here and in this grouping. is now in yar. this is the most important stronghold, which contains huge stocks of weapons of military equipment node providing communication of deep

territories. this third line of defense with the second line of defense, therefore, based on this, it is clear that artyomovsk was the most important node here, behind which they fought, because in fact their second line of defense collapsed. if they continue to resist there, they will be surrounded and destroyed. moreover, on the right in temovska, they have problems with saturating the third line of defense with troops. not only does it need to have a defense line, but it also needs fortifications building. there you need to have people and equipment. that is, this question immediately arose about the evacuation of part of the forces from this area here, so i believe that i believe unambiguously where artemovsky is the key key victory of our troops, which create favorable conditions for further actions. and here i want to pay attention.

today, everyone must have heard that what took place means that actions were said by a sabotage group, but there is a sabotage group with tanks. yes, it's much more serious. it is most likely small. well, also quite small serious intelligence. this is the unit that was solving the task of reconnaissance in force, which is operating in the belgorod direction in the belgorod direction. here and this is clearly visible desire to ensure that our troops. from this direction from street to that direction because, uh, this will reduce in this case. uh, the pressure of our armed forces on these key directions and on kramatorsk to force us to transfer troops there and prevent the introduction of, uh, the second echelons of our troops. significant contingents here

the emerging breakthrough, most likely, it looks like it, so i can’t explain to others the attack on belgorod has no operational prospects. i'm not even talking about serious tactical ones, they will be destroyed, but from the point of view of distracting attention from the treatment of part of the forces in this direction. this may well be understandable and understandable. konstantin admires the achievements on the battlefield of the russian armed forces all the time. i admire, because when we know how many weapons ukraine received and kissel said that the ukrainian army is becoming the most the best armed army in europe when we look at their military budgets. how much if you want strength and energy? it is connected to the fact that the ukrainian army is undermined, and if at the same time the russian army manages to win victories, then from my point of view. this is very, very

impressive, but i will now be the devil's advocate for a minute, our ukrainian friends in quotation marks and their patrons. oh, they will tell you. well, in general, it was not such a big victory in artyomovsk, because ukraine deliberately consciously did not throw its best units there and prepared their counteroffensive what is called kept their forces somewhere in reserve. that's when you look at the nature of the ukrainian resistance in artyomovsky to you. it seems that ukraine did not desperately fight for this city. well, let's start with the fact that this battle lasted 224 days. this time. secondly, there is data on apu losses, apu losses. that's just why the region in 224 days. only 50,000 killed and

120,000 wounded, one of his military correspondents named such a figure. well, war experts have such data, what is 50,000 broken, this is a completely destroyed general military army. and if you take the wounded, it turns out, that means, uh, somewhere 170.000 170.000. these are three common military armies. this is a colossal number of personnel. just a huge amount of personnel. now i want to remind you more lustration that at present they believe that the shock group of 40-60.000 people will allow them to carry out the offensive. 40-60.000, and here 170 were destroyed and disabled . that is, this is not the kind of force that someone will throw for deceptive purposes, of course, huge losses suit the cat. here and here even tanks armored fighting vehicles.

they already had a lot of tanks there, so tanks, that one unit was destroyed, but if we compare how many europe delivered 220 tanks, half of those delivered there have already burned down under well , roughly speaking, there, of course, not only european dances, e. these are ukrainian. but that there about 100 tanks burned down about 1,000 armored fighting vehicles destroyed thousands of units. uh, that's a huge number. that's a huge number. that's where it was all presented publicly and they had a formation battle about it. it was in a place called hiroshima to say what to choose to meet so. called the big seven hiroshima and what a meeting place, but it's either just some incredible moral blindness. or i don't even know how to say it. provocation is a symbol, probably, japan said, i always represented

this district in the parliament, i wanted it to be in this city. i think that, apparently, he had some kind of under some thoughts. generally. i think this is a symbol of determination to reach the nuclear zelensky while in hiroshima accused russia of vigorous blackmail while in russia, and you might think that it was stalin they truman who threw the atomic bomb on hiroshima . and here are the people who, like this, absolutely turn history upside down, they, it seems, are not even ashamed, except as shifters. i won't name them, but in general it is, of course, a very interesting meeting. uh, except for such moral

blindness. uh, there is again with the american after all. this country is a complete violation of the strategy that you cannot simultaneously shove against two great powers. and so, what impressed me is how, on the one hand , they devoted this entire meeting unequivocally to the fight against russia, and on the other hand. in general, they did not forget about china and were very serious, and very serious claims were made against china and china. let's listen. we will oppose china's non-market policies that distort the global economy and practices such as illegal transfer of technology or disclosure of data. we are also aware of the need to protect a number of key technologies, the use of which may pose a threat to our national

security. however, we do not want excessive restrictions on trade and investment. we strongly oppose any unilateral attempts to change the status of the region through force or coercion, there is no legal basis for china's expansive maritime guerrillas in the south china sea, and we oppose china's increased military presence in the region. we are concerned about the human rights situation in china, including in tibet and xinjiang, where forced labor is used. we call on china to put pressure on russia to stop its military aggression and immediately withdraw its troops completely and unconditionally from ukraine ie well, i don't know what to do. senator. denisov you are a diplomat. i have never been a diplomat, but here i am trying to understand something, it is normal in diplomatic practice to start your statement in order to expose you and say that they

are going to fight you, and then call on them, china to help against russia, here, what is this then, well, you know in today's diplomatic practice, especially, if we are talking about the united states of america , in my opinion, perhaps everything is even some kind of ehemism. you know , there are actually no such verbal turns that somehow softened being a text. i am not an expert in the field of stylistics, especially, uh, so to speak, the american style androynik. uh, at the meeting he knows better, but i have such an impression, based on my own experience, that it was purely american. that is, just up to the comma nothing european german french italian. well, i don’t take canada, japan, it ’s like she’s not a player here. there just simply wasn't left.

as a matter of fact, what we talked about here in this same audience a few days ago, that the europeans might try to resist in order to somehow soften the wording in their favor . here is the final communiqué, but they won’t succeed, the americans don’t care break. well , apparently that's what happened. here. let's hear how he reacted to this, and the representative of the chinese ministry foreign affairs. the g7 speaks of moving towards a world of stability and prosperity, but in fact it impedes international peace, damages regional stability and suppresses the development of other countries, such actions do not inspire any international confidence. the g7 does not take seriously the concern of the chinese side, persistently manipulates the polls regarding china, slanders and attacks our country, grossly interferes in its domestic politics. china expresses in this regard a strong protest has already been made on this occasion by a serious presentation of japan as a host country itself. well, i think

it's said very clearly and i think i don't know what you think senator. in general, american diplomacy could not expect anything else. you know, here, too, there is such an interesting moment, i would say a certain novelty, because until relatively recently, chinese diplomacy was distinguished by restraint, a seasoned style and some such sharp still avoided expressions. and here we are we see complete certainty. that's what they thought, what they wanted to say, they said it, they said it sharply, definitely by and large. for e. china exists. well, the concept of the red line is not very fashionable now, and they are interpreted in different ways, but in the case of china there is a red line. and the most important of them is interference in internal affairs, therefore, that passage uh, about human rights, there xinjiang tibet and there , of course, he touched on something else, what is called the strings and

china answered the way it answered, answered directly hard and i hope it will be remembered. hmm uh, it just so happened that in uh, 16, when trump had already won the election for another, and not assumed his presidency. uh, the chinese organized under the auspices of one of their international companies a meeting from all over the mountains of hassle. yeah, and they invited many of them to folk experts. and at the same time they invited a representative of the trump company, in which for some reason i ended up, apparently because trump did not want to send an official representative of his company at all, but before meeting the chinese. and uh took me out during uh lunch. a high-ranking chinese

diplomat said that he was very encouraged by my speech about the fact that in a. the trump camp understands that china is a very serious power. and that no one wants a trade war, but he said, the main thing is that you understand one more thing. with regard to trade, we understand american claims, we do not always agree with them, but we understand them, and here we may have some flexibility. well, here's the thing.