there is, and it is aimed primarily at communication between the two of them. that's why we seem to be talking about the fact that cats really do meow and communicate with each other, but it's another matter that they, of course , they redirect this behavior to humans and try to understand them, and how they are understood from here. they improve it. they do not play along with us . fall into this childish image in order to become children and get more. uh, the caress formula, they don't play along. this is natural. for them behavior hmm she wants communication. she will torment. that way she can scrub your bed. she can tear up the wallpaper. you can stand up and throw a slipper at her for her, this is also communication, you know? what's the deal all the same about the needs, except how to devour? that's when you stroke it and why do you like these at all? well, because she is also a social animal in the sense that she also needs communication and also needs a format, of course, of course. that is, this is a form of communication that is tailored for an honest physical. and contact is a friend

of different species, because when we pet a dog, when we pet a cat, we we enjoy the release of oxidation, pleasantly warm, and in nature, someone who strokes a cat is other cats, and physical contacts between cats, they are amazingly rich in lynx and diversity among themselves. that is, if we look at some populations of animals, a group of animals, they are united among themselves, as a rule, cats that do not live at home, and the dike, by the way, some that live at home, they unite in some groups of comrades, so to speak, groups of friends, that is, it is difficult to call them, but it is difficult to call them a family to call someone else is friends. these are just friends without any sexual text. and if they are sterilized, yes, they are, and so on this then this sexual connotation. it appears only during the breeding season, when the cat is ready. but it's closer to spring, well , i really like to have sex. sorry cats no, and how we believe that a cat no i don't know. like cats, but cats don’t, it even

hurts them, but how would nature be arranged in such a way that it programs animals for certain behavior, which leads to sexual intercourse and beyond the birth of kittens. well, they get satisfaction from this, as the satisfaction of instinct, you know, it does not get pleasure from this in the understanding that we lay down. but stroking all these snuggling. it's not erotic already pleasure. yes, exactly, if we return to the fact that these groups of friendly cats. there is also such a meme, when you take your finger, stick it out to your cat so to show it fits and the nasiks rests there. this is just one of the manifestations of behavior. maybe you are very often seen when daggers meet who are friends. this is how they greet each other with their noses. that is, they are sniffing like this, and you are like this for them like hello, and this is you - this is, as it were, one of the elements of physical contact, that is , it usually means that cats are good.

get along with each other one of the same signs to determine whether your cats that you have is actually friends, but whether they sleep together in the sense that not just you have a bed and on one corner one code on the other corner, the other is not so namely, when they are sleeping from embracing here, having fired at each other, relying on it will fly away completely, friendly hugs, there is nothing decent in this. yes, boy girl, there is nothing decent. this is a very important indicator. and another of the most important indicators is whether they stroke each other. this is joint grooming and when a cat allows another kat or a cat or when a cat allows another cat to lick itself, this is directly above the manner of trust, that is, in this sense it counts, but they are ultra friends on ultra settings. that is, in the sense that they so close social contacts that they are, well, straight, that's a very closely related group, because in general, that's how you kindly describe the community. what is directly

enviable is that i am not homo sapiens, because everything is difficult to get homosexual. i read some research, just on the psychology of pets, but not only do they behave. and what role do they play in the family and such , uh, psychologist anna varvarga, who deals specifically with family systems, they are animals, because everything is so gloomy there that kuta is such a deputy for resolving the crisis in parent-child relationship in a marital relationship, married would be nice. this crisis would be solved there by the crisis on the radio, when parents do not let the child go, well , psychologically, they take it, otherwise everything seems to be fine, but the crisis remains unresolved and people would learn from cats to agree to communicate to be friends. i think it would be useful on the one hand. yes, they really are that social they really are. we need it for communication for treatment, maybe even our emo. final problems

because technically we're on a cat we shift, as it were, a duty to a psychotherapist. we have some kind of therapy , you know, and after all, if we poll the population. why did you get a cat, we will have two answers prevail. the first answer is because she is beautiful, and the second answer is because i feel good with her she will listen to me and uh, i enjoy talking with her. and then there is the word communication. here you need to pull it out of context, and circle it in bold and you understand what i mean. with you podcast schrödinger's cat and i'm its host grigory tarasevich editor-in-chief popular science magazine schrödinger code and our guest is a wonderful expert miroslav volkov, a zoopsychologist and, by chance, quite by chance, under the casting. here we are talking about schrödinger cats question about the metaphorical role of the cat. who is this anyway? it's something very homely very childish very spontaneous. here,

is there any universal image of a cat in these places memes. it seems to me that the universal image of a cat is very well described by kipling and a cat that walks by itself, but it is described there, i would say close. to the devil, because indeed this is not the way a cat shoots. she's great in her own way, babysitter. she keeps the hearth, but at the same time walks by herself. that is, it is a little independent of the century, that is, it cooperates with us on a number of conditions, but at the same time it remains, uh, a little apart. yes, that is, you understand, we like it precisely because of its independence. it seems to me, because there is some kind of mystery in this. that is, it even seems to me that it has some kind of maybe erotic text, because in this sense we are also a cat very often in art in cinema in

comics, superheroes everywhere. we have a cat - it's always some kind of creature. here, well , sexy, you know what i'm talking about, respectively, we have this image very clearly formed, which, first of all, of course, is something mysterious. this is something that is unattainable. this is something fragile, but at the same time, something predatory this is something you can’t reach, and that you can’t fully know . that is why we even have a religious culture in our culture. uh, different representatives of various faiths, the cat is divided into two types, the cat of the devil and the cat from god. some people burned cats for communicating with cats. in some cultures, cats were considered the devil, and other people had other cults. they revered the cat as a goddess and one of those animals that help people enter ah, to the kingdom of the afterlife, yes, which escorts us not only throughout our lives, but even

further. well, cypriot, kitten, just the same kitten can be cyrillic cats of a thousand years ago, a person's afterlife absolutely true and still this is with us and, accordingly, someone loves cats very much. that is why, and someone loves cats very much and that is why you understand, and here, as it were, for a cat throughout its history, as it seems to me personally, just this duality is present. it is present and therefore, probably, this image will be contradictory to different people depending. everything comes from a different cultural perception of personal experience with these animals, but this is what makes it great, because, for example, a dog, but everything is clear with it. there's enough with all due respect to dogs, but she has the only, as it were , a portrait - this is a man’s best friend, what else can we say about her, but a cat. see how many personality colors she has, this is not racism. it's an acceptance of the fact, because the dog. she is, well, she isn't enigmatic. lord , we have put so many experiments on the dog, how

many poor animals do nothing, probably not rats, they can not even boast. it is necessary to this, and everything is so with cats. it's just that we still have a lot of things that have not been studied on cats. even in veterinary if we see if there are any drugs that are only for dogs, uh, or guess. what are the other mysterious diseases that dogs have. you probably won't remember it that easily, but what about cat medicine? it's straight even a separate sti. and this is a separate m-m for a professional branch. let's say studying this, we open clinics specifically for whom for cats, we have uh, hmm there are like me, for example, for psychologists for whom for cats. well , although cats still work as dogs, then a more specific story, which has much more of its own nuances. it seems to me that culture, they, a-and this is what

they paid their attention to. that is, as if they left their mark with such a portrait of mystery and unlikeness to anything else. well, straight straight envy arises free successful independent sexual lords, why are they a cat, but still they are also comical because memes are often something very funny. remember this great meme about natasha well, yes, so that everyone drops dollars, drops oil, drops. why is this code very often is included in some kind of comic story, well, especially in memes, and not only because , uh, humor is a defensive reaction of the body to almost everything we see in videos, when a cat starts running from one corner of the room, he runs to the shelf to jump on hanging tv on the wall is a tv. so he falls and breaks his grandmother's favorite vase. then he himself is surprised, runs somewhere else, while yelling spins and then gets up and looks at the owner, what will he do? well,

isn't that funny? yes, he broke half the budget there is annual, but at the same time it's cool, and how not to laugh at it is understandable. the point is that people start it. hmm , sort of, well, force it and they treat it appropriately. well, because we love to eat, we are ready to forgive them, even such things someone is not ready, but most people , nevertheless, are probably ready and it turns out that memes arise from here about their behavior about their funny grimaces and well. moreover, we project their behavior onto ourselves. that is, we understand that a person will not. run like this and uh, that means destroy everything that he got, and moreover, this is some kind of violation of social rules. well, the cat did. give him a fuck. you imagine that there will be a dog. if she also starts to destroy everything, i imagine, and the cat, can you allow it, and in fact, as it were, this is how it all happens from here. this is the culture. she gets into memes and she gets into song. she gets into some

comics cartoons and whatever. well, anyway. we must often endow those qualities with those feelings of our cats, which in fact they don’t have, they don’t, there is such satisfaction from what they have done or such irony , they have a sense of satisfaction, because they have resources and a sense of satisfaction. it, in principle, lies at the basis of all our behavioral reactions at the basis of all, no matter how we complicate it. this is actually with its moral and ethical blah blah blah, but everywhere we have a sense of satisfaction of our needs at the forefront, and cats have the same thing, in fact, because, as it were, he was already running. yes, this one is ours figurative cat. he ran, he threw out his physical energy somewhere, and he was satisfied with this and then, most likely , he went to sleep and, accordingly, as it were, but he got a feeling of satisfaction, but at the same time he does not understand that he did something bad for a person, that is, but we still believe

that cats are some psychopaths. they do not understand the meaning of hmm, more than they understand the meaning of fatigue, and the annoyance of fun or a sense of satisfaction in those around him, that is, he does not project himself onto those around him with low emotional intelligence, but lack of emotional intelligence. he's not an empath at all, that is, uh, cats don't feel love in that sense, they don't feel jealousy. they do not experience, more precisely, in that, you understand, which we are pawning, but accordingly, this is good, because they do not feel envy. they don't feel rage. they don’t want to take revenge on us, they don’t want to substitute some kind of soft one for us , and so on, that is, in this, cats can be much more human, maybe than people, but on the other hand. they just have personality traits precisely due to the lack of some of the things people have. and what should we homosipens learn from cats? i

don't think it's worth learning from cats. it would probably be silly, but i think that we should communicate with cats. yes, that is , to learn in general through cats to comprehend the world of life around. that is, we first of all , it would be nice, in fact, to understand that not everything around is like us in the sense that we really need to learn to understand cats. we need to learn to understand, otherwise how they think, and what they want is rude speaking so that we can live together peacefully, but because when we try, but to establish a common language with animals. one way or another, we try to communicate with them through the prism of our world of perception of our feelings, yes, our assessments of this world, and so on, but for cats, everything is more straightforward and simpler, and accordingly, when a cat is offered written on the bed, we immediately we think, here she is dissatisfied with something, she wants to take revenge there, she wants. to recoup us, she , and so on, wind ourselves up, we begin to dislike her

, hate to punish, and so on and accordingly, people contact me with this, that is, very often people write that in the sense that the cat purposefully destroys some thing that is dear to me, and it seems to me that she wants to avenge for and gave a list. uh, from one of the guesses of the reasons why the cat wants to punish its owner in one way or another, but no, but, probably not, probably the cat has lost that resource that was previously available. and now she wants you to resume. and to be honest, we just have a pandemic of this, that cats in cities are very deprived of attention. we we get a pet and leave it to the production of fate precisely for the reason that we believe that a cat is not a social animal. well, like the fact that we got a cat, and she should behave well. we got her and she should. well, just live with us, but

at the same time we forget to give her a game to communicate, we forget to fulfill her natural needs in the context , not only food, but a good scratching post, but quality toys attention to her, yes, but in the sense that you can’t get a cat and not to play with her, but so to exterminate a dog with her walk. you understand what, and what i'm talking about, and it turns out that the cat has extremely little of this valuable resource. just play with her for 15-20-30 minutes a day and she will be much happier than buying the most expensive luxury in the world. elite is great. you understand the premium, and it turns out that we very often forget about it. and we should just learn to understand animals, what they need, what they need to give, and then we will have a higher quality in life, because these animals will be next to us. and they will have a higher quality of life. that we can help you achieve this. it seems to me that cats did not come into this world in vain, and not only

to catch mice. but what else is there to teach us to be people a little, but now it is the main thing. it seems to me that this is exactly what it is, that is , it is easy to be with us and try to improve our mental and moral health, as well as through this and physical condition. well, in general, thanks to the cats that treat us , educate us, teach us to be more tolerant , more understanding, more caring. thank you for watching or listening to us until next time. in the podcast, schödinger's code. let's talk about complex things simply and about simple things difficult. hello this is a podcast of the lives of the wonderful

and its leading writer alexei varlamov, and today we will talk about the wonderful writer of the playwright michael afanasyevich bulgakov. it is clear that each of us has his own bulgakov, each has his own idea of ​​him, but i want to offer you my reading of his fate. in march 1940 , 10 days after bulgakov's death, the actress mkhata olga leonardovna, kniper. chekhova wrote a letter to yalta to her barn, the sea of ​​chekhova's tree, and there were such lines buried. we bulgakov thought hard about his talent and his unsuccessful life. it must be said that it is impossible to find more accurate feeders to bulgakov's fate precisely in such a striking combination of talent and unsuccessful life. moreover, if by talent, everything is clear, and

no one has ever questioned bulgakov's talent. with an unsuccessful life, the situation is probably more complicated, because if we let's remember the fate of other bulgakov's contemporaries akhmatova's holy platonic fate. bulgakov seems not so terrible tragic. well, he really felt himself to be the most unfortunate, most driven writer in the soviet union. and so , was it really so, and why did he have such a feeling, that's what i propose to talk about. so mikhailovnych, bulgakov was born on may 3, 1891 in the family of associate professor of the kiev theological academy afanasy ivanovich bulgakov. and his mother was called a barbarian. mikhailov pokrovskaya was her maiden name, her last name is very

it is important to say that bulgakov’s ancestors both on the paternal and maternal lines came from the so-called bell nobles, that is , they belonged to ancient priestly families that went into the depths of russian history and , perhaps, there was no e in the history of russian literature, at least in xx century , for sure, writers with such church roots. this is important, because it is this writer who will write the novel, which many consider to be a dubious novel. a heretical novel. the master and margarita bulgakov was the firstborn in the family, then he had six more brothers and sisters. and it was a happy beautiful family. and in general, everything that we know about bulgakov. childhood testifies that it was a good childhood, which , again , is very rare for russian literature and for the fate of russian writers, so in general, whoever you don’t take, as a rule, some family dramas, tragedies, wounds, from which they grew up, and future writers whom something bulgakov

in a different way, happy childhood, happy, patronymic, which, however, was overshadowed by the early death of his father afanasy ivanovich died, when misha was 15 years old and actually. after that, such very serious dramatic changes begin in his family and in his own destiny. bulgakov departs from the faith , departs from that system of values ​​of orthodox values ​​in which, but he was brought up, why is this happening? it seems to me that the reason is here, and not so much some kind of philosophical one. how much purely psychological bulgakov could not forgive his mother for the fact that a few years later, not even summer , in fact, a few months after of death. her husband varvara mikhailovna is getting married for the second time, and her second husband turned out to be the attending physician afanasy ivanovich , who was 7 years younger than her, but nonetheless . she was such an attractive amazing woman that this man

married her and mikhail begins a sharp conflict between his stepfather and mother. and what is very important. that's with their value system with christianity. this is not happening in soviet times. not during the revolution. this happens during bulgakov's youth. perhaps this was one of the reasons. why is bulgakov not followed in the footsteps of his father, and entered the medical faculty of kiev university , which, however, for a russian writer for a future russian writer was such a wonderful traditional thing, you can remember dr. dall, dr. chekhov, dr. veresaev, with whom bulgakov would later be friends. you can remember, finally, dr. yuri zhivago. and then bulgakov, being a student, gets married , in general, he will have three wives in total, and the first one was named tatyana tatyana nikolaevna lapa from tatyana nikolaevna to him, and you put, perhaps, in the most dramatic, in the most eventful, a years of their lives and the first such

serious test that fell to their lot and to the lot of the whole country. it was the first world war and bulgakov takes part in it, and at first he is sent to the front as a military doctor. the wife follows him. and then. here they are sent to the rear in the smolensk province. and i must say that in all the complete vicissitudes, the life of our hero is completely tested. this period of service as a zemstvo doctor is perhaps the most tragic. logical the most difficult time and later he will write a wonderful book about this called notes of a young doctor a book about how his young hero overcomes those difficulties, these come out, as if we are winners from those difficult situations, and in which he turns out to be, but in real bulgakov's life there, however, was very bad. bulgakov paradoxically, the russian revolution saved mikhail afanasyev's attitude towards the revolution in general, which was sharply negative for him.

this is just a disaster, but nevertheless the revolution saved him, because in 1918, when russia concluded the treaty of brest-litovsk with germany and emerged from the first world war, the need to continue his service as a zemstvo doctor but bulgakov disappeared and he was able to return to kiev he again found himself among his friends, among brothers and sisters, among people close to him, and but it became as if so important for him, and the motive to live is to work, and meanwhile in the city itself. not kiwi , dramatic events take place, which later formed the basis of the novel the white guard and, uh, the plays turbine days, all these events are well known, uh, received such fictitious independence following the results of the brest peace, and ukraine was then under the german protectorate, it was ruled by the hetman-skoropatsky and at the same time on this territory. yes. hmm, such a strong nationalist movement was maturing, led by uh, a former literary critic. uh,

semyon petliura and the petliura troops. at the very end of 1918, when the germans left kiev and the skoropadskys fled with them, and all the top leaders of that time fled with them. petlyura made an attempt, a successful attempt to capture kiev and the russian resistance itself volunteer resistance russian yankers russian officers who lived in kiev this is unfortunate. save kiev from the petliurist bows, and all this was experienced by bulgakov, and then formed the basis of the novel, which will be written a few years later, the pyatnirovites did not last very long in kiev. but what is very important they tried to mobilize bulgakov as a doctor. and then mikhail afanasyevich, as it were, was finally convinced that the profession of a doctor is extremely dangerous in the fall of 1919, a white man entered the city and the white men mobilized him. here

it is difficult to say voluntarily he entered the service of them or forced biographers about this historian. e. bulgakov argue, but the fact remains since the autumn of 1919. bulgakov joins the active army in the volunteer army, but the place of his service is not kiev, but the north caucasus, that is where he is sent and that is where bulgakov takes part in skirmishes. it is there that he takes ending for himself. the decision to leave medicine and take up literature and writes several texts writes several articles and stories of such white guard content his political position. absolutely unambiguous, and he is an enemy, but of any nationalism. he is an enemy of any revolution, he is a monarchist, he is a conservative. e. and, of course. eh, now, if

it depended on him, then he would not want no political changes to take place in russia, but political changes, as we know , also took place in february 1920, and the red army knocks out white troops from territory of the north caucasus where bulgakov was then. and if it depended on mikhail afanasyevich, then, of course, he would be in exile, would go to emigration and we talked about bulgakov as a writer of the russian diaspora, along with bunin kuprin. aldanov merezhkovsky nabokov and many other remarkable, but russian writers, but this did not happen. he fell seriously ill with typhus and was unable to evacuate with the whites, and subsequently bulgakov could not forgive his first wife, but i must say that she followed him everywhere and everywhere. it's literally like a thread behind a needle. and now he could not forgive her for not getting out of him. although, she later told uh, biographers bulgakov that, but he was dying.

he was between life and death and she couldn’t get him anywhere, that is, bulgakov fell into typhoid under one power, woke up, under another, under which he himself and a had to live, and further he had only 20 years left to live. these remaining 20 years are bulgakov's life under the spell, as he himself said, but this is the life of a man who had to do an extraordinary lot. at first he starts working as a dramatist. he writes plays that are performed with great success in the theatre. in vladikavkaz, but he understands his scale, he sends several plays to moscow, they get lost somewhere and do not receive them. there is no answer and in 921 he comes to moscow, we remember the topic very well, the beginning of bulgakov's story heart of a dog, yes, where the unfortunate man drank his monologue from a ball, cold, hunger there damned bourgeois janitors, which means uh, boiling water, uh pours on him . i think in many ways bulgakov described his own feelings. he came

to moscow, he had nothing, no money, no clothes, no medical profession. he times and forever abandoned no apartment there was nothing. so he started from scratch, but he was full of energy, and he began to make a career. in general, he was a careerist, in this, well, as it were, in the high, deep sense of the word, that is, a person who saw a goal in life and consciously walked towards this goal, and from a certain moment, it was literature that became this goal for him. uh, just dramaturgy. this is what is in life. journalism was also involved, because he started as a journalist and, in fact, becomes such a literary tool as his profession, and namely, and journalistic activity cooperates with several soviet newspapers, and, what is very important, he never tried to mimic. it is clear that these are the early soviet years. it is clear that this is such a revolutionary spirit that rushes, and above the earth and very many people do not agree with this. yes, they had to somehow

adapt to this. bulgakov did not adapt to nowhere and his talent never saved him. he was needed by the young soviet republic. like this one, if you want a bourgeois specialist, because he is very he wrote really cool, besides, as i already said, he did not like the revolution, he did not like wars, he did not like disasters, as a person, and therefore the fact that in the soviet union in soviet russia and in these years certain changes begin associated with the introduction of the nep some kind of rollback, if you want, yes, in the eyes of bulgakov, it was the restoration of normal life, so it was such a not very long period when bulgakov and the vector of soviet development coincided and bulgakov, in general, did not lie, when in his essays for the famous berlin newspaper the day before. he wrote, honestly wrote, that life in the country, living in moscow, is gradually returning to, er, a normal course. but it is clear that his ambitions were high. and how

to be content with a modest role, a felitonist journalist. it was for him that he wrote roman his wonderful novel, which is called the white guard novel, which he lived in kiev these terrible december days, and 1918, and which now, with tears of snowiness with pain with love, remembering his house, his city, his youth he i called these shadows. perfume he sculpted these amazing images and it really turned out perfectly, er, an amazing book about a catastrophe in which people are trying to survive without losing themselves, without losing their honor. uh, keeping my conscience and my mind, and it turned out to be a really , amazingly deep, amazing, bright, interesting book that can be said to have failed with this book, some very strange thing happened , only two-thirds of this

novel was published in the journal russia and after that, uh magazine was closed and bulgakov's novel was left without the attention of readers, without the attention of literary criticism, and of course for mikhail afanasyevich it was a terrible blow, but bulgakov's little star. such a rather gloomy, bulgakov star, which hung somewhere in the sky. here she somehow smiled a little and a in 1920. well, the middle of the twenties, the twenty-fourth twentieth year. well, how lucky he was, but lucky, because his novel let not be finished and read at the moscow art theater and there, as if the idea arose, the idea was understood that from this novel you can make a play later bulgakov will describe all this in a theatrical novel and theatrical novel - this is true. such a very largely accurate psychologically convincing bulgakov biographical book, here, uh, and the facts that are stated there correspond to

reality, good. who really came, and the director of the moscow art theater called ilya sudakov a and offered to make a play from the novel and stage this play, and in the bulgakov moscow art theater the idea would be extremely liked, because he in general there was a thinking of a playwright, in general there was a very theatrical person. here is bulgakov with great interest and great enthusiasm. although it is a very difficult task from the great multi-faceted novel, where there are many heroes, where the action captures such a large time period to make a play, but he did this play. there, he was forced to reduce it, sacrificed it, enlarged it. eh, united the characters, but not even that, the most important, the most interesting, the most interesting thing is that this is a play that the moscow art theater began to rehearse. uh, very uh willingly so willingly that er konstantin stanislavsky who at first belonged.

and he was rather skeptical about this idea, in general, he didn’t like it, not bulgakov’s novel, not the play that was written, he liked the performance and the most difficult thing that awaited, but the theater - this will defeat censorship to overcome censorship and stanislavsky. this succeeded and somehow in the fall of 1926 a miracle happened when on the scene. the performance of the moscow art theater came out, which was called turbine days. the expert was colossal and there was a colossal negative wave. soviet critics, who could not understand anything, well, simply could not understand how , in the ninth year of soviet power , these unfinished white guards could appear on the stage of the best theater in the soviet union and not in the form of some kind of boorish bastards. eh, hooligans are subhuman, but nice , pleasant, charming, beautiful people. this is what caused outrage. it caused. just some kind of anger, just some kind of avalanche of articles,

and everyone was convinced that this avalanche would crush. bulgakov will crush the theater, as if he will throw out this a play from the suburbs, but nothing happened , the performance went on every other day. it was impossible to get into the sunshel and i must say that bulgakov’s life after that changed a lot in all respects in the material, so that it was very important for him, and he really almost completely changes his lifestyle in front of another apartment, other habits, other clothes, and even another wife more such a brilliant society woman. her name was love evgenievna belozerskaya a, and she perfectly corresponded to such a period of bulgakov's. takeoff. this is generally very an important point, because we are accustomed to perceive the fate of mikhail afanasyevich as the fate of such an exceptionally unfortunate writer, hunted down by soviet criticism of soviet censorship by soviet power. this is only partly true, but there were gaps in bulgakov's life.

and such a gap was quite long in the mid-twenties, when the play of the day of the turbine was on, when then the play of the zoyki entered the vakhtang theater, the apartment is also a very interesting work on the theme of the soviet moscow nep and in the chamber theater. there was a wonderful one, which was called crimson island. is it hard to tell if you knew or not? soviet criticism, and did bulgakov himself know that the reason for his invulnerability in quotation marks was none other than iosile, stalin loved the theater, loved classical literature, and the theater also loved the classic , loved the moscow art theater, and so stalin liked the play turbine days one way or another. bulgakov had a patron and there was an illusion that this would always be the case, but it did not last very long in 1928, such the first bell sounded was banned, and the performance, or rather the play, which the moscow art theater began to rehearse bulgakov's favorite play, run, but, nevertheless, bulgakov's other three plays were going on. and when, at the very end

of 1928, stalin received an indignant letter from a group of soviet playwrights, with such a cry , as long as the best theater in the country goes, anti-soviet play. eh, stalin replied by the author of this letter. that you first learn to write, like comrade bulgakov, but nevertheless, literally 2 or 3 months pass and in february 1929. suddenly, an order follows to remove all bulgakov's performances and for a long time historians of literature could not understand at all what kind of fly bit stalin, and only during perestroika a very curious literary document surfaced. it was a transcript of stalin's meeting with a group of ukrainian writers, and and in this program, ukrainian writers simply in black and white, told stalin remove the play the days of the turbine, as an anti-ukrainian play and stalin gave in, it's hard to say whether bulgakov knew or not, e about this situation. well, here it is, what is curious at

this particular time in 1929, bulgakov arises the idea of ​​​​the future novel the master and margarita, and now the master and margarita often argue over there, it's stalin not stalin, that's how this triangle seems to me. yes , there is a ruler, there is not a person with whom he sympathizes, and there is a third force that hates this person and demands from the ruler that he punish yes pilate, yeshua, the sanhedrin. it seems to me that a drawing of stalin bulgakov and this ukrainian delegation, which demanded that bulgakov be removed. this is psychologically what will later fall. e in the basis of this one here, and the ancient ancient storylines, and the novels the master and margarita somehow bulgakov turned out to be in the literal sense of the word a broken trough, but so far he has not given up, he has been working, and he is writing a play called the cabal of the hypocrites, the action takes place in france of the 17th

century. and its main character, it turns out, is the playwright jean-baptiste, whom molière simply adored. so he writes this play, brings it to you at the moscow art theater to emigrate to the past or to another country , the ears of modernity stuck out of this play, and it was clear to everyone that this story, which is called the artist and power. and bulgakov realized that he did not understand at all. what to do? that's what what to do next in life you are not printed. you are not put. you don't have any work and waiting for you, as he later writes in a letter. ah, the street of death, not an account in the letter, in which in a letter to stalin, again , bulgakov decides to write such a letter to stalin in which we lay everything their grievances and ask at the end of this long , such a feverish letter. he asks stalin of two things. so let me go abroad. or give me

some work here and otherwise i just died stalin and he answered, and stalin answered him. all this happened in april 1930, and april 18 was good friday, which is interesting, and in bulgakov's apartment and since the call is stalin says, unfortunately, we do not have a transcript of this conversation. and we can’t say exactly what stalin bulgakov talked about, we know about the content of this conversation from the memoirs of two women, bulgakov's second wife, lyubov evgenievna, and here is the future third wife, and elena sergeevna a. but if you try to summarize, then the meaning was such that stalin asked if you were not very tired, comrade bulgakov and beyond. here i am saying, unfortunately, we do not know exactly this dialogue, but then, as if stalin asks bulgakov so why do you still want to go abroad or