tv PODKAST 1TV May 28, 2023 2:50am-3:31am MSK
2:50 am
i devoured him and kept kept kept and all in the grass. i mean, it’s taking my hands away and glory to allah has thrombosed. all got only the treasure and started doing it all. well, how many stitches were put in. remember well 2.5 cm was a dissection right into the deep deep. it fell apart like that, then it flew up, however, it helped me, which means that it was the american side that was there. she was a doctor of a doctor's education, and she was powerful at that time. uh, that means medical styling, its american is not so good, these i did for him there. cool, in general they wanted to shoot. i didn't let them shoot. otherwise, mister goal would be right. he only broke the distance, but he broke his head. well, it could break. well, she went out after him, like es. when we arrived, everything was open.
2:51 am
well, after checking the tightness of the bleed, there the pressure equalization was all opened. luc we usually met bread and salt there, which means hot food. it 's been cold for two days. there is nothing like this here, and ours is this one, which is our russian, we received an order from the houston control center american astronaut. this citizen should not be allowed into the american segment, categorically not allowed, and then this blood did not start playing for you again. what did i say, who are you? it is necessary to explain to people that there it does not weigh for shorts and in the american segments. that's how it went. i swear baturin is looking at me. i say yura quickly. take
2:52 am
this camera. i saw the camera quickly and shoot. i mean, i always shoot the american one, which means that they removed everything and the very first flight. i'm dropping. american on the american segment and your ban on me to the light bulb after the flight, they maintained relations as because i heard different tourists, then a lot more flew off and in different ways, some commanders also forget to fly. the crew is not trained normally. how are you with him? well, this one he understood what it means, he’s not just me, like a driver, there’s a taxi driver to take him out, i brought him there, and i actually live for him
2:53 am
. minister musaev spacebiter. all nanny first nanny cosmic well, the return was also very dramatic already fly. all undocked back already fly. here i pulled them. i attract, well, the commander is the easiest. that probably means i’m stronger there, so that i don’t fall out there, i don’t break it, and, of course, i dragged it out a lot. we are flying, waiting for the engine to start. infrared vertical first failure infrared vertical second orientation is lost everything. soup reported the soup says, switch to manual switch to manual. we restore the orientation according to the vsc and launch the ship behind the psc.
2:54 am
it tracks itself in orbit, which means yes, well, orientation everything is correct. and here we are waiting for the start of the engine. yes, yes, we are waiting according to the cyclogram. this is the most important point and track the magnitude of the momentum. otherwise you sit down. or maybe, firstly , it takes a second for it to start up and work out the required seconds of 115 and 2/10 m / s². nothing has changed, we are waiting and suddenly, why did i feel before that no one takes this little medical package with them. and suddenly the commander says soup to me when i listen.
2:55 am
urgently find a medical pack. find pill number three and give it to the tourist, i'm stunned unfasten. there is our business to perform unfasten. but already checked, hermetically sealed suits. you can’t take off your gloves for everyone, but there’s such a small pill in the glove. it’s oak gloves, and i found it and pulled it out, i give it to him, he loses it, she flies away. i got the second one or barely got it. her mouse, he does not understand russian, opens his mouth. everything, like i start to pursue in 2 minutes. he says, the commander is listening, i did everything. now find pill number five. i've got a stupid pill and i also get it, and now he needs to speak under his tongue. give like
2:56 am
i forgot the language, like a word in english. i mean to him. i put the circus to him, so i put it there. i just closed my mouth, i say, close everything in german. i could hardly buckle myself and the engine had already started to work. i said yuri, you are now alone, and he has experience. no, more. now you track everything and the heart and the engine and understand everything and time. i say no hours, and how crushed. the flight was 450 km. it was ballistic. no? yes, because the orientation is gone. and we, and the square does not work in the machine, built then everything is built on eye. well, everything was fine. why understand accuracy? apparently not, he tracked exactly 0.067 °
2:57 am
450 km. it's like this. yes, now, so we put on another mask and went, uh, into the effort to walk in manual control. what were the overloads? i was afraid of this, this is the impression, but for a long time i was overloading and we sat down with a shortfall of 15 km, and we got to the zone, that is , it was bent like that, which means he has such big eyes and skills. he at least said something, if only he could breathe. so i thought he wouldn't land alive i guess. well, they’ll shoot me there, damn it, the first fool in the world drove me. and i couldn't bring it. apparently he liked it because i read on the internet that he had already bought a ticket for himself for his wife to fly around the moon with her masks. i know, i know he is no longer 61, 83, but this year. well, yes, well
2:58 am
, he lives somewhere in two, maybe, well, he takes very good care of himself. here we were at his house for a week after the flight, he invited us to los angeles, and we lived at his house. it means that he leads a very correct way of life. that is, you continue to communicate. not anymore. well, 22 years have passed, then the americans don’t accepted. it’s good that they invited everyone home, everyone was surprised, because they don’t have such a thing. we don't have human relations. you're everything to me, and it's not you who paid. i say i paid money. well , unfortunately our time is coming to an end. we visited two space stations of the iss mira station and talked about the first space tourist and the man who brought the first space tourist. this is a pilot cosmonaut hero of russia people's hero of kazakhstan doctor of technical sciences talgat musaev and i anton shkaplerov - this is a podcast
2:59 am
space stories. when such people as don quixote are translated let history close the book forever, there will be nothing more to read in it, as once he wrote about the hero cervantes. turgenev hello dear friends, today we gathered our thoughts about don quixote. i greet you vadim vladimirovich polonsky doctor of philology, director of the institute of world literature, our good friend archimandrite semyon imachinsky candidate of theology candidate of philology is a well-known dentist, although today it is relevant. yes. i am vladimir league. yes, let's start with turgenev and let's start, actually, why
3:00 am
will there be nothing more to read in the history book if people like don are transferred to quixote into one vladimirovich are you ready to agree with this? yes of course. and i must say that these words of turgenev from his famous speech, then articles, they say this is don quixote, they were foreign to the russian perception of laughter before turgenev laughed at others . yes, yes, it was really accepted in russia through french mediation and in general, it was a story about a madman, who, uh, fool in your head, what is called beating with windmills in shop windows. and see this differently. e, of course, e could have been earlier, but the meaning of the word has fundamentally changed. don quixote precisely after turgenev, he showed that don quixote is paphos e, sacrifice-wearing self-sacrifice, and to the end uncompromising oneself in the name of the triumph
3:01 am
of a lofty idea in the name of the triumph of truth, as it is seen by the one who sacrifices himself? and in general, this is the most important thing about a person. a let's talk about it a little later father. and you agree. eh, here with turgenev's, and the statement is in general its comparison. very interesting. in the sense that e sideboards from shakespeare died, in general, they came out on the same day. and don quixote is also the first part of don quixote at the same time. yes, that’s why he compared them, but in general, i have a difficult relationship, to be honest, with don quixote, because on the one hand it’s really like that according to a survey of all experts. here is a norwegian writer's club, this is the best book of all times and peoples, just everyone. yes, yes i really. i still have the figurine at home. here is this famous don quixote where he is so wonderful with a book in a hat, that is, this is a very important soviet time. it was straight, really some kind of such a cult character. eh, that's what i understood on the one hand on the other
3:02 am
hand. here's to the end to understand, what is his secret, and bane and attractiveness. here is such an influence in the good sense of the word, about which vladimir also speaks. eh, i still can’t completely, and in this sense, i’m interested in all our programs, yes, that was my next question. i’m still quoting turgenev to finish, i’ll remind you of my colleagues the context, because turgenev says what he says there, he says that he loves her yes, he didn’t see her in general, when he suddenly saw this ugly peasant woman. he said that she was bewitched and turgenev writes further. we know such people. we have seen such people who have seen the beautiful - i am not quoting now, but it seems to me that we definitely convey the beautiful, but in the ugly and ugly and died for it , and this phrase continues with which we began a thought that was not at all obvious, is it worth dying when you see the beautiful in the ugly? what's in here? and so to speak, the great core truth. what else is there to die for? as not ideal from the point of view
3:03 am
of turgenev, yes, and in general about this, but those who inherited this regenev talked about the ankh a lot. e, in fact, i don’t know about this block in my article , a monk knight dedicated to vladimir solovyov, who also invented his eternal life from such a technical point of view, yes , which, in general, are not, and so on, for him. it was reality, it was the reality of his inner mystical experience, uh, stronger - this is reality, but he has the experience of don quixote at least, almost to the end , until the moment when in the finale he experiences an internal upheaval repentance uh. well , then we remember how it all ends, and therefore you think nabokov will write his lectures from don quixote, of course. who is dulcinea is death. in such a paradoxical conclusion, he is talking about this about what you just said, it’s true yes, they are quixote in general, er cervantes, the opposite of
3:04 am
boba is crippled and immoderate anti-flobert such you know, who does not remember that he had two chapters ago. there is error upon error, spitting on details and so on. this is a completely anti-nabokov approach and nabokov is just cards. c'mon, well, of course, as a result of nabokov's talk about the fact that servitude on earth measures. uh, the backdrop is not convincing there, and there spain didn’t know her like that at all, no better than gogol, uh, knew central russia, other things, eh. well, i still have to admit it. here at there such a beautiful image appears that nabokov and sancha are two figures in the sunset sky, they are far away they are small. well , they cast great shadows. these are the shadows throughout the history of human culture, and some of them, as it were. inspection in reverse perspective, so he is forced to admit that these shadows are all the same, he certainly, he starts with this one. well, actually hate. ah , he ends with don quixote, well, almost a declaration of love, if you read the lectures here,
3:05 am
but i know, uh, with your permission. now moving on to the content. that's what i would like to ask you in continuation of what we started. ah, well, from the main question. yes, but uh, perhaps prefaced him with lotman's, that the book does not boil down to what is it about, therefore, a stupid question, what is this book about? i won't ask you. and the question was born to me. so, when you read this book or there we will tell you don quixote , here is what is there most dearly important, or maybe from semyon , as you said, incomprehensible and what you cannot accept, for example. well, in addition to what has already been said. well, with on the one hand, firstly, it’s that, he is already 50 with him rodnik and that he is like that and me, too, yes, everything is cartilage. that is, like this e, but on the other hand, this is a real monk. yes, he is fully committed to the ministry. and in general, he sees the world in a transfigured light. yes, he is wearing
3:06 am
vr glasses. uh, don quixote walk. that's why it stood and the courtyard turns into a knight's castle. there are courtesans in graceful ladies. and so on, he sees some. uh, some enemies there, yes or in the form, on the contrary , some incredible expanses. that is it here is such a factory, full of good words. yes , as if the elder, according to issia, said in the sense that it doesn’t matter at all. what are you doing? what are you doing, you plow the land there, i don’t know , you are building, you are fighting, but it is important. with what feeling do you do it, for what, uh, and this goal-setting, it justifies. everything else. well, it's actually, really pure nun. moreover, in the figure of don quixote, he takes a lot for himself. his name, yes, that is, a kind of initiation into a knight. these are monastic rituals after all. yes, his ascetic life, that's he is at night without sleep there without eating there for a long time and so on.
3:07 am
that is, there is a lot of this e-e from a monk in it, and at the end it already accepts the scheme again. we are on a mortal model, vadim vladimirovich but for you, what is the most expensive thing in this novel today, but aching. eh, sympathy. i am the protagonist of the feature authors. eh , to evoke this feeling in me, as you read or, in general, uh, the ability to force him in uh, who is infinitely actually higher than you and everything is more than you. well, what kind of subtle hunts are there, god forbid the kid will adjust. well sancho is also very difficult, not at all simpler, and his brains were the first to hint about this. it's at the very beginning. yes, and they, of course, still resonate the locks of the course and well and sancho rises to the heights of king solomon from e. your courts. yes, there are direct parallels. yes yes and during the governorship. island here. in general, i, of course, this semyon has the right to talk about what i don’t have the right to talk about, but, uh, what he said is also very important for me and this directly correlates with the personal
3:08 am
path of myself and is difficult correlates a and with uh dynamics of the plot of the novel and with its finale from the path of the author himself, because shortly before his death, and cervantes, e, becomes a member of the brotherhood. from the third brotherhood of the francans, like dante, by the way, then he accepts. eh, haircut. yes, i think the last one. but still, uh, already in this capacity, he writes the finale, where, as it were, this is understandable. true, er, like the revelation of christendom before her. he sort of gets on his knees accepting her truth there, well, capitulated, in what? what is the truth in what is needed? and to subject yourself to oblivion is the one who fought with e, mills , who, e, was hungry for tolsinei, who went all this way, but the point has been reached from the horse, you
3:09 am
were thrown further, really the scheme at some time the scheme and the finale. can you please tell me why there is such a disparity in ratings? here we are now, even the father of names, it seems to have said, it’s not clear there, but we agreed that there is a beautiful, dear ascetic monk there. eh, schemnik, in fact, but the range of estimates is enormous. why is her father? i think that it provoked the servants. here are these with their confusing references, to, as it were, other authors, that he has nothing to do with it, that he is some kind of manuscript there. eh, yours are lost. there is one chapter left unfinished. but i need to look for them to translate from arabic to me, yes, uh, and then he positions it himself, as a parody of a chivalrous novel , to speak directly about this on the one hand. that is, no matter how seriously you treat his work, but on the other hand there. crowded, as we have already said, and people are precisely the holy scriptures. there very serious no with these service. why does it cause? i mean such a range of assessments of, uh, the hero himself. yes, why the same on
3:10 am
the blocks, although in one 85 he will say about nabokov not a proservant, but he calls it an encyclopedia of cruelty. well, because it is, in principle, an explosive mixture of everything, u where everyone, if desired. maybe pull out one or the other from there, right? well, in this sense, i'm not even close to nabokov anymore. and uh, borchis, yes, which is the name of autodun quixote, his story is wonderful, where, as it were, the author of another time, the frenchman writes himself anew through himself the same don quixote, but, as it were, in a new one with the same words, not because he rewrites imitates. but because these same words can sound in another era in exactly the same way, this is such an absolutely amazing idea. eh, that is here. uh, if some smart people start about it. to think, then they really pull out some extraordinary thoughts from there. and it's not related. vadim vladimirovich with the dynamics of the image himself, because don quixote at the beginning of the first volume, and at the end of the second. well, it's just a completely
3:11 am
different person. he changes and matures. uh, well, the wrong word will be covered. he really changes the snake, as cervantes himself obviously changed from e. there since the first years of the seventeenth. eh, the seventeenth century until the fifteenth year, when the second one comes out the same there 10 years. yes, in my opinion, the difference between the output of the first or second. yes, the fifth and fifteenth, but it was written earlier. of course, well, that’s not the point, but in fact, from the very beginning. still , the multi-level nature of his image is set and you are told such. in general, in many respects, a prodoxal equivalent and, uh, the image itself from the very beginning speaks of what strikes, how crazy he is, when he comes here as a gift, does he, how much is he? but from this it begins to unfold further e length uh, there is a suite of e situations where don quixote manifests himself very unevenly. yes, he is insanely wise, he is an amazingly educated person. yes , his education is the education
3:12 am
of a humanist, brought up by a high revival and at the same time this man who says, like a humanist. uh, brought up high renaissance with the italian school. besides, yes, but i remember that this is a biographical italy for many years lived servantovsky himself. he, uh, goes out to fight for the triumph of paseism for the triumph of the golden age for the past for the truth of chivalric novels for the integrity of the medieval world of vision, you need to draw for 10 years in a row for five hours a day or i still won’t see who this genius is? let me introduce you mikhail alexandrovich vrubel, i dream of becoming your customer. i have enough of mine my own whims, so that i still fulfill others'. i conceived one composition, well, i can not finish it.
3:13 am
misha blames himself for everything, believes that this is punished for everything, he comes every day from the early morning and rewrites it will be jubilant to do secrets of great artists, as ordinary mortals cannot premiere tomorrow on the first vadim vladimirovich polonsky doctor of philology archimandrite simeon tomachinsky candidate of philology candidate of theology, i am vladimir legoy. yes, we gathered our thoughts about the great romance miguel cervantes don quixote you do not agree with the assessment that he is a renaissance man or is it too flat and this and that, he is a very multi-leveled image and this one gives such
3:14 am
an amplitude to his friends rejection, because among those who did not accept him. uh, there were figures. on a grand scale. they only stand for nabokov. yes, for example, there is a look that you on don quixote don quixote was extremely restrained, and he said so philosophically restrained. yes, an apology for income - this is rather a story characteristic of two national traditions of its perception, russian and english. it’s a little more difficult for others, but nevertheless, at home, too , after all. well, of course, yes, and you mean, in addition to, so to speak, yes, that's about insanity. hunt here, in my opinion, in the scene when he is going there, e with the lion, someone asks the sancha, your master is insane. he says he's not crazy, he's bold. here is the father of the names don quixote is mad or daring. i think at the same time. what do you mean boldness is generally such a christian virtue, in fact, yes, that is, uh some common phrase, the lord does not like
3:15 am
the fearful, yes, for whom there is a place in the north lake. yes, that's why he's a christian. it seems to me boldness in the sense that he is open to exploits to protect the oppressed is another matter there, how is it all in reality, what does it lead to? it's, well, everything, it's different. yes , when this poor boy says that it is better that all the knights perished with you, and he really is. well, it's on the way, it's on the way. this is not the final. yes, in general, it seems to me that to add to them absolutely true words, that the father said. he, uh, he's not just a monk-knight-monk, there is still visible what in the eastern christian tradition is associated with her kinship. yes, he is a holy trigger holy jester , only this is not a model of behavior. eh, the chosen one consciously does not understand her own something, a trickster for him. here, of course, are his glasses. this is how he sees the world. this is how it feels. eh, this is somehow special. type and kinship is never
3:16 am
greek. yes, but very, very deep. why do i remember now? here, listening to you about this celebrity medieval stories about juggler of the mother of god yes, that's a juggler , yes, who did not know how to express his reverence, stood in front of the flock of the virgin, just, well, and depict what he depicts there in the circus. yes, and in this sense it can be compared, because after all, where does the eastern christian growth come from, of course, this is a tradition, most likely franciscan, and not by chance. eh, the shirvantes didn’t get along with the cannon there. yes? let's deal with the monasticism of don quixote , this is, yes, yes, now the monk and i mean monks and we will start with philologists and finish, moreover we’ll finish with the monks of philologists, and look at the bicilli. uh, famous for his article uh don quixote loyov. i understand that he was not the first who even, in my opinion, in some articles it is written that ignatius laos is the founder of the jesuit order, that he is the prototype of don quixote but for
3:17 am
russian culture. this is two. that's a completely incompatible way. we have the word jesuit, maybe because of the sound of something similar to a fanatic, but it generates extremely negative connotations. yes bicilli shows how many intersections and right there the geologist says, but still the order of the jesuits and the tradition of monasticism of the eastern christian is, as they say, a huge distance, like a classic, it means that because of this they are not monks. yes, it's just perfect. other other purposes yes, orders, but in fact, really. here in this article, uh, it is emphasized that in fact they are both layola and uh, don quixote people of action. yes , this is homofabar. yes? it's some kind of thing, but in fact it's just e in the same article it says that the jesuit this system. yes, that is, it is a certain sequence of actions, firstly, complete obedience,
3:18 am
which we do not see, in principle, directly in don quixote. well, actually to him. what a system , he is just a completely non-systemic person. yes, if he is a monk, then such, er, as if wandering yes lonely monk e yes. i thought that here the question would arise rather about dulcine. this is us separately fanatical vera actually speaking about the same speech. and when he goes to compare, it was not at all the first move. could be for th well what matters is that well, it didn’t, yes, and e sideboards of the layer. there he knew he sold well, you understand, this is what metal is in the air a and he writes an image related, but this friend is important here. why is it not equal? well, look at another interesting moment for me personally, in my opinion, weight or writes about it. he says that this is the type of saint. but this is active holiness. and here, too, probably to a greater extent, but is this western christian than
3:19 am
eastern christian or not? yes, yes, he says about it, that it is not contemplation. he's like once he opposes, and contemplation to activity, but in fact, don quixote with his contemplation is also all right. i really like the episode. it seems to me, again , it is clear that i was not the first to notice that sancho often lands. but when he says, i will now, therefore, fight here to pray, there or something repents to beat stones, and so it's all true. sublime, as they would say today , pompous, and sancho says, you are more careful, you can kiss once, so the head of a pebble and your whole game repentance yes, yes, here oh, is this a game with rmb or is it just, well, he does not let him take off, so to speak. somewhere too far away, probably, right? he's still there live on the edge. another time the polarities interact. yes, the sanchepans are such pragmatism, then really the ability is a friend, but to see, to hear, uh, is high, and uh, yes, there is a game here,
3:20 am
it is exposed. yes, he doesn't laugh. not only sancho is the author in gay heroes there is all this priest with uh barber. yes, and so on, well, yes, there is a game, but it's not shit in a way that is not separable, but then let's talk about love about friends. but you have already begun to talk, but about some kind of internal sensation. it just seems to me that it’s fundamental and perhaps the most important answer to the question, in my opinion, sit down what is income, and he says, yes , understand, sancho, that it doesn’t matter to me at all whether it exists or not, some kind of love is destroyed. today dante was remembered, of course, not at all beatric. yes, because in a dulcine he never saw it in his eyes, that is, for him. it's just some really service to a beautiful lady, which, as we know, uh has a long history. tradition, but e goes back to the veneration of the mother of god all the same yes, initially.
3:21 am
e, therefore, although there in one episode they say to him, listen, well, what are you calling for with some kind of stronger instead of praying to god, yes, and he has such complicated explanations there, so that god and too apply. but it’s clear that this is some kind of screen lady after all. why charm? well, this is a beautiful lady. yes, in which don quixote serves as a screen in the sense that it is like an appeal to the first image. well, in my opinion, maybe on the one hand, yes, but with the other side. here, uh, vladimir vladimirovich , correct me if i'm wrong, after all, as they say, yes, because a and sideboards, most likely, have not read medieval knightly novels. the content changed very quickly, yes. after all, there were already novels, written, and to which he sends. revival because in medieval medieval chivalric romances, this is not yet the case. well, that's the relationship right there. knights there, of course, he really is. mostly. these are
3:22 am
novels of the 16th century and a little earlier one way or another. otherwise, the novel is of the british cycle, and not of the royal one. yes, it's all very strong, uh, later courtly culture, yes, with all its conventions. and already passing into the stage of such mannerism? yes, this is the kind of ethics on which cervantes is a little ironic. he plays with him at some level this is a game. but the game draws with itself today. and then it's all very serious. i am absolutely right, these simeons, flesh to those levels where memory goes, and the veneration of the mother of god of the mother of god will then echo in russian culture there was a knight in the world poor dostoevsky and there is myshkin yes, and so on, these meanings are actualized by necessity. eh, the ideal is associated with a high christian sense , eternally feminine, mother of god, of course, in its stances, but also deified with. still, i would not
3:23 am
strongly overcome this biat here from the troubles of speech. so, uh, it's just serious there. and here it is a little bit in the playing field of don quixote partly 300 of that, dante who visited dante's purgatory paradise, these images are attributed. that is, the tenth and don quixote, of course, we will attribute yes, with a dant, because it’s just that cultural language that the sideboard has undoubtedly mastered. of course , today we gathered our thoughts about the great cervantes novel don quixote , archimandrite semyon tomachinsky vadim vladimirovich polonsky, vladimir igor, and we continue. but about a-and don quixote and sancho yes, two points. we still can't do it anymore. but but really e, today we have already heard. what is rustic? maybe even stupid there greedy or
3:24 am
just greedy, sancho by the end of the second volume is turning. well, almost really, not the biblical sage, who is on this pseudo-island, so to speak, when the leaders. yes, he does make some wise decisions. and in general, every time i re-read it, i feel sorry that he leaves from there. and what are you playing? he? well, how can you be so cool, you have already begun to manage here and donkey, whose course is very often very much compared with christ, these parallels. how do you feel about the end in general? well, with christ, of course, it can be strong. i now i don’t even know, it’s clear that it’s not with the theologian. from the point of view he asks, yes, well, the fact that sancho pansy, of course, is also an extraordinary figure, who also devoted himself to serving his master. although he doesn’t even consider this directly as his master, he had every right to. there, at any moment, leave him and i don’t understand at all, he understands perfectly well, in general, what it is, what it is nonsense, that this is
3:25 am
some kind of foolishness and so on. well, yes, that's the question, you know? or that is, he seems to understand, but suddenly, but it seems to me, here absolutely not because of some mythical governor. he goes, because there are some moments it is clear that he is close . eh, here's to some respected person. e friend. yes , you can say e in this one, the enterprise of which he does not even really understand the meaning. it seems to me that this is his devotion. and it's not some kind. here is such a dog he has criticism there. another is maybe there was even a blast, there and so on. that is it not some kind. here. eh, blind let's say obedience. yes, uh, if you don’t introduce this terminology, and this is a conscious choice of love, uh, follow don quixote. and in this, of course, he is absolutely amazing and what is the nature of their relationship, and it changes throughout this great
3:26 am
book. sancho armor, vassal of this knight. but here duality is important. that's how banks move he and a madman, when it comes to chivalry and a sage, so sancho he and uh, a simple man pragmatic greedy, uh, and one who is capable of selflessness serving uh to their own e, and to see things they are united by the fact that they are e, so it is said brains. dial yes, they are from peaceful wanderers, one earlier and the second fame. and in fact, such out of love, of course, if the love for this uh , for this person is there for this one of theirs, at some point they grow together so much that one does not introduce themselves to the other. and by the way, in those chapters where they diverge. eh, it feels like something is not that broken, something is starting to be missed. yes, san that in fact he is already at the beginning of the novel and at the end of the novel. he is dual. he, of course,
3:27 am
varies, but less than income. i said so. well, he's already been solomon. he already ruled the island so wisely, in other situations he showed his module. let's see the final. he is there, of course, very hard going through the death of his friend and from israel, but at the same time he perfectly manages to get drunk and get drunk. yes, otherwise he was not himself. he remains true to himself. this is a surprising discovery as, uh, artistic, finding this pair that complements each other. yes, you know, in terms of the reader's reaction. i, well, i try to re-read it with some regularity on this great book and here are my personal sympathies. here are the involuntary ones that arise. yes, when this boss is the violent charm of the image. yes, i have them quite clearly moved from don quixote to sanch. yes, if at the beginning i was somehow here to me much closer interesting i followed. so i involuntarily responded to the donhot. now on sancho, you know what other thought is very dear to me. mm someone said they don't.
3:28 am
nothing more important than talking to each other to each other. that is, these are people about dialogue, these are people who are constantly in dialogue. yes, this is a wonderful thought, indeed, not at all between themselves and the mutual complementation of these opposites, as if there are some meanings, after all, they argue there and so on swear and so on, but some very important ones, but they pronounce the meaning. eh, maybe this is just the main thing, uh, the charm of this work is. here in their e combination in their e, communication and in what is born from this unity, just a dialogue, as life shows - this is not such a simple thing. and this is a great value. i think people can save the opportunity dialogue. yes, and here it is also so masterfully done, and there they themselves sprinkle proverbs a little endlessly with sayings. yes, all the time in general, uh, in spanish culture, sancho is
3:29 am
a folklore name, and a lot of all kinds of small folklore genres are associated with it, in which one way or another about such and such, yes. or just plain simple. yes, it says. eh, often these sayings are completely meaningless. but really , you understand how angered peas are, and because of this , he scolds more scolds. here but it is meaningless and sayings. here is his pragmatic earthiness means stupidity. yes, and so on, somehow it turns out to be amazing, but malleable for, uh, quite serious, very deep. and the dialogues with don quixote are just extremely subtly done. this is where nabokov is completely wrong. he did not see that cervantes is thinner than flaubert in these things, you understand, we do not have much time left. i know literally dotted line. i would like to say a few words, we have already reached out a little bit to this literary children. don quixote i will not speak now, because it is an eternal image and images that
3:30 am
live independently, we will probably have to gather our thoughts about it again to talk about it. i just wanted to ask hmm if you here have any favorite children of other hunts. i'll start the actual confession. i love the japanese author and shusa klenda very much. e, a wonderful writer of the 20th century, a catholic japanese, completely unexpected, perhaps, for japanese culture, he has the flavor of the fifty-ninth, in my opinion, the year 1950 , the ninth dear mr. fool, who , when we translated for some reason, said that this is experiitta there something, although it it's obvious what it is? dostoevsky's idiot, but by and large it's don quixote, so to speak, in the limit, this hero , which means it turns out, and if you have some favorite don quixotes, it has already sounded today, of course, you get some very obvious image, but going on, idiots date was so wonderful.
24 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on