but i want him to share his experience with me, because if i want to skate further, i need someone new, some kind of coach who will give me something new. and let it be a very cool champion who i respect as an opponent. listen, i think so then, if he calls, if they ask e, we will come. that is, there is no need to guess what the guys will think, i will ask you the benefits. yeah cool. the real champions you generally consider yourself to be in the future. maybe as coaches. are you ready to pass on yours to the younger generation or vika, i'm not that ready. i really want to and i still do not understand at what point this should happen, because i know very precisely. what, what, to achieve, uh, a very cool high result. i have to live a lot of hours on the ice with athletes who still need to be found to help them. at first it’s a huge path,

it’s possible, and now it’s a fence, but it’s no less difficult, and in general i really want to, really, i just don’t know yet when, uh , when to start, maybe, but you know better than anyone that if you want something for sure, then it will definitely happen. and you, i can say for sure, but about nikita that he just has a talent for exactly how to teach? i'm shocked how similar our couples are, because as nikita explains and does not explain. well. no one can tell in detail how everything is here, how the body should stand, he will not forget anything. he knows everything about every little thing, and this seems very useful to me, so i'm all for it in general for my knowledge, which, er , thinkers often communicate very much on the ice. how to make it more convenient for us, we ride like that

further, and here i am. previously, i used to speak very aggressively , somehow hot-tempered, i probably spoke, but i tried very hard. eh, this is because of maximalism. well, yes, to make it better here and now, one hundred percent the same thing with me, i began to try, because everything already had to change. it’s just with the transition to zhulin to explain in a different way, a little more intelligibly, calmly stop yourself to show more times, if necessary, and it ’s in the explanation, it seems to me that i began to feel very quickly that just a person begins to understand faster, although you it seemed. don't you understand that i want you? no, not all people understand what you want from them. and of course, i am generally grateful for the knowledge to all three, starting from my mother, who gave me all the most ingenious basic foundations for my whole life, and here are nikolai

morozov and marina zueva and alexander zhulin from all over the team. yes, and all the people who participated, in general, in this one in my sports life. i thank everyone. i keep everything in my head. and i hope that here, uh, when sometime, when i became a coach will help in case of chance, i realized that really every coach. he gave you something. and even if you have a grudge against some coach. you know what not to do. and this is also a cool experience, and one that helps you. in coaching. the most difficult thing will be to kill the athlete in yourself and become a coach, and not be. and here i am, and i did. so this is the hardest part. and you, vika, as i understand it, are ready to just be nikita's muse, i also really want to convey. uh, my experience and knowledge anyway, but so far, that i have no desire to directly give myself to the maximum coaching and spend all the time, for example, on the rink, until i have one. perhaps

my opinion will change later, but i am always ready to help and be there. do you see someone now in russian ice dancing, who is able to reach? well, at least your success, maybe from juniors, not yet. what needs to be done? how to change, what needs to be changed in the russian approach to ice dancing, so that we have some kind of material that can reach the olympic heights, in your opinion, call. sash you are everything heard. nikita always ready guys, well, on this, i think on a positive note, our conversation has come to an end. unfortunately, i chatted with you, probably until the very morning, but our air time is not rubber, just like our time in figure skating programs. thank you very much for decorating our broadcast today. you just shine two loving hearts. thank you

very much. it was cool. it was a free program podcast. i am maxim tankov and today we are olympic champions victoria sinitsyna and nikita katsapapov. hello this is the podcast life of the wonderful and its lead writer alexei varlamov, and today we will be a wonderful writer. it is clear that each of us has his own bulgakov, each has his own idea of ​​him, but i want to offer you my reading of his fate. in march 1940 , 10 days after the death of bulgakov, the actress of the moscow art theater olga leonardovna, to niper. chekhova

wrote a letter to yalta to her barn, maripal not chekhova, and there were such lines buried. we bulgakov thought hard about his talent and his unsuccessful life. necessary to say that it is impossible to find a more accurate metaphysic for bulgakov's fate precisely because of such an amazing combination of talent and unsuccessful life. moreover, if by talent, everything is clear, and no one has ever questioned bulgakov's talent. but with an unsuccessful life, the situation is probably more complicated, because if we remember the fate of other bulgakov contemporaries akhmatova, svyatoyeva platonov , but the fate of bulgakov seems not so terrible tragic. well, he really felt himself the most unfortunate, the most driven writer in the soviet union.

it really was, and why he had such a feeling, that's what i propose to talk about. so mikhailovnych, bulgakov was born on may 3, 1891 in the family of associate professor of the kiev theological academy afanasy ivanovich bulgakov. and his mother was called a barbarian. mikhailov pokrovskaya was her maiden name, the surname here is very important to say that bulgakov’s ancestors both on the paternal and maternal lines came from the so-called bell nobles, that is , they belonged to ancient priestly families that went into the depths of russian history and perhaps there was no e in the history of russian literature, at least in the twentieth century, for sure, a writer with such church roots. this is important, because it is this writer who will write the novel, which many consider to be a dubious novel . a heretical novel. the master and margarita bulgakov was

the first-born in the family, then six brothers and sisters were born to him. and it was a happy beautiful family. and in general, everything that we know about bulgakov. childhood indicates that it was a good childhood, which again for russian literature and for the fates of russian writers it is very rare, in general, who you won’t take, as a rule, some kind of family drama, the tragedy of the wound, from which they grew, and the future writers of someone bulgakov in a different way, happy childhood, happy, patronymic, which, incidentally, was overshadowed by the early death of his father, afanasy ivanovich died when misha was 15 years old and in fact. after that , such very serious dramatic changes begin in his family and in his own destiny. bulgakov departs from the faith departs from that system of values ​​of the orthodox values ​​in which, while he was brought up why is this happening? it seems to me

that the reason is here, and not so much some kind of philosophical one. how much purely psychological bulgakov could not forgive his mother for the fact that a few years later, not even summer , in fact, a few months after her death. her husband varvara mikhailovna is getting married for the second time, and her second husband turned out to be the attending physician afanasy ivanovich , who was 7 years younger than her, but nonetheless . she was such an attractive amazing woman that this man was on her married and mikhail begins a sharp conflict with both his stepfather and mother. and what is very important. that's with their value system with christianity. this is not happening in soviet times. not during the revolution. this happens during bulgakov's youth. perhaps this was one of the reasons. why bulgakov did not follow in the footsteps of his father, but entered the medical faculty of kiev university, which, however, for a russian writer for a future russian writer was such a wonderful traditional thing, you can

remember dr. dahl will remember dr. chekhov, dr. veresaeva, with whom bulgakov would later be friends. you can remember, finally, dr. yuri zhivago and then bulgakov, being a student, gets married, in general he will have three wives in total, and the first one was named tatyana tatyana nikolaevna paw from tatyana nikolaevna to him, and you put, perhaps, in the most dramatic, in the most saturated, and the years of their lives and the first such serious test that fell to their lot and to the lot of the whole country. it was the first world war and bulgakov takes e participation, and first, as a military doctor , he was sent to the front. the wife follows him. and then. here they are sent to the rear in the smolensk province. and i must say that in all the complete vicissitudes, the life of our hero is completely tested. this period of service as a zemstvo doctor is perhaps the most tragic. most difficult time and later he will write

a wonderful book about this, which is called notes of a young doctor, a book about how his young hero overcomes those difficulties, these come out, as if we were winners those difficult situations, and in which he, it turns out, but in bulgakov's real life there, however, it was very bad. bulgakov paradoxically, the russian revolution saved mikhail afanasyev's attitude towards the revolution in general, which was sharply negative for him. this is just a disaster, but nevertheless the revolution saved him, because in 1918, when russia concluded the brest peace with germany and withdrew from the first world war. the need to continue his service as a zemstvo doctor but bulgakov disappeared and he was able to return to kiev he again found himself among his friends among brothers and sisters among people close to him, and and this became, as it were , such a main thing for him, but a motive to live , work, and meanwhile in the city itself.

nicky or there are dramatic events that later formed the basis of the novel the white guard and, uh, the plays turbine days, all these events are well known, uh, which received such fictitious independence following the results of the brest peace, and ukraine was then under the german protectorate of its rules, and the hetman -skoropatsky and at the same time in this territory. yes hmm mature so strong a nationalist movement led by e, a former literary critic. uh, semyon petliura and the petliura troops. at the very end of 1918, when the germans left kiev and the skoropadskys fled with them and fled with them. all the then top. petlyura made an attempt, a successful attempt to capture kiev and the actual resistance of the russian volunteers , the resistance of russian generals of russian officers who lived in kiev. this is unsuccessful. save kiev from the petliura

gangs and all this was experienced by bulgakov, and then formed the basis of the novel, which will be written a few years later, the pyatnirovites did not last very long in kiev. but what is very important they tried to mobilize bulgakov as a doctor. and then mikhail afanasyevich, as it were, was finally convinced that the profession of a doctor is extremely dangerous in the fall of 1919, a white man entered the city and the white men mobilized him. here it is difficult to say whether he voluntarily entered the service of them. or they argue about this historian of the biographer bulgakov, but the fact remains a fact from the autumn of 1919. bulgakov enters here he is in the active army in the volunteer army, but the place of his service is not kiev, but the north caucasus, it is there that he is sent and it is there that bulgakov takes part in skirmishes. it is there that he takes

ending for himself. the decision to leave medicine and take up literature and writes several texts writes several articles and stories of such white guard content his political position. absolutely unambiguous, and he is an enemy, but of any nationalism. he is an enemy of any revolution, he is a monarchist, he is a conservative. e. and, of course. uh, now, if it depended on him, then he would not want no political changes to take place in russia, but political changes, as we know, also took place in february 1920, and the red army knocks out white troops from the territory of the north caucasus where bulgakov was then and if it depended on mikhail afanasyevich, then, of course, exaltation would have gone, he would have gone into exile , and we talked about bulgakov as a writer of the russian diaspora along with bunin kuprin. aldanov

merezhkovsky nabokov and many other remarkable, but russian writers, but this did not happen. he fell seriously ill with typhus and was unable to evacuate with the whites, and subsequently bulgakov could not forgive his first wife, but i must say that she followed him everywhere and everywhere. it's literally like a thread behind a needle. and now he could not forgive her for not getting out of him. although, she subsequently told bulgakov's biographers that, and he was dying. he was between life and death and she could not get him anywhere, that is, bulgakov fell into typhoid under one power, woke up, under another, under which he actually had to live and further he had only 20 years to live. these remaining 20 years are bulgakov's life under the spell, as he himself said, but this is the life of a man who had to do an extraordinary lot. at first he starts working as a dramatist. he writes plays that are performed with great success in the theatre. and vladikavkaz, but he understands

his scale, he sends several plays to moscow, they don’t get lost somewhere. he has no answer and in 921 he arrives we remember the theme very well in moscow, the beginning of bulgakov's story heart of a dog, yes , which describes the unfortunate dog ball, his monologue, cold, hunger there damned bourgeois janitors, which means uh, boiling water, uh pours on him. i think in many ways bulgakov described his own feelings. he came to moscow, he had nothing, no money, no clothes, no medical profession. he once and for all refused no apartment, there was nothing. so he started from scratch, but he was full of energy, and he began to make a career. he was generally a careerist, in this one, well, as it were, in a high in the deep sense of the word, that is, a person who saw a goal in life and consciously walked towards this goal, and from a certain moment it was literature that became this goal for him. uh, just dramaturgy. this is what is in life.

journalism also got involved, because he started as a journalist and actually becomes such a literary tool of his profession, namely, and journalistic activity cooperates with several soviet newspapers, and, which is very important, he never tried to migrate. it is clear that this the early soviet years, it is clear that this is such a revolutionary spirit that rushes, and above the earth and very many people do not agree with this. yes, they had to somehow adapt to this. bulgakov did not adapt to nowhere and his talent never saved him. he was needed by the young soviet republic as such, if you want a bourgeois specialist, because he wrote very really cool, besides, as i already said, he did not like the revolution, he did not like wars, he did not like disasters, like a man, and therefore the fact that e in soviet union in soviet russia, and in these years certain changes begin

associated with the introduction of the nep soviet development coincided, and bulgakov, in general, did not lie, when in his essays for the famous berlin newspaper the day before. he wrote, honestly wrote, that life in the country, life in moscow, little by little returns to, uh, a normal course, but it is clear that his ambitions were high. and how to be satisfied. here is a modest role, a journalist feuilletist. it was for him that he wrote roman his wonderful novel , which is called the white guard novel , which he lived in kiev these terrible december days, and 1918, and which now, with tears, with tenderness, with pain, with love, remembering his home, his city he evoked his youth, he evoked these shadows. perfume he sculpted

these amazing images and it really turned out perfectly, uh, an amazing book about a catastrophe in which people try to survive without losing themselves, without losing their honor. eh, keeping my conscience and my mind, and it turned out to be a really , surprisingly deep, amazing, bright, interesting book, which can be said to have failed with this book, some very strange thing happened, only 2/3 of this novel was published in the journal russia and after that e magazine was closed and bulgakov's novel was left without the attention of readers, literary criticism and, of course, for mikhail afanasyevich it was a terrible blow, but, and bulgakov's star. such a rather gloomy, bulgakov star, which hung somewhere in the sky. here she somehow smiled a little and a in 1920. well, the middle of the twenties , the twenty-fourth twenty-fifth year.

well, how lucky he was, but lucky, because his novel let not be finished and read at the moscow art theater and there , as if the idea arose, the idea was understood that this novel can be made into a play later bulgakov will describe all this in a theatrical novel and theatrical the novel is real. this is very accurate in many ways. psychologically convincing bulgarian biographical book, here, uh, and the facts that are stated there correspond to reality deeply. you really came, and the director. ilya sudakov appealed to me and offered to make a play out of the novel and stage this play. and at the moscow art theater he liked the idea extremely, because he generally had the thinking of a playwright, in general he was such a theatrical person. here is bulgakov with great interest and great enthusiasm. although this is a very difficult task from the great a multifaceted novel, where there are many heroes, where the action captures such a large time

period to make a play, but he did this play. there, he was forced to reduce it, sacrificed it, enlarged it. uh, united the heroes, but even this, the most important thing, the most interesting thing, the most interesting thing is that this is a play that the moscow art theater began to rehearse. eh, very e, willingly so willingly, that e konstantin stanislavsky who at first belonged. and he was so rather skeptical about this idea, in general, he didn’t like it, not bulgakov’s roman the play that was written he liked the performance and the most difficult thing that awaited, and the theater - it will defeat censorship to overcome censorship and stanislavsky. this succeeded, one way or another, in the autumn of 1926. a miracle happened when a performance came out on the a in the stage of the moscow art theater, which was called turbine days, the success was colossal and there was a colossal negative wave from

soviet criticism, which could not understand anything, well, simply could not understand how in the ninth year of soviet power on the stage of the best theater in the soviet union can these unfinished white guards will come out and not in the form of some kind of bastards of temples, but hooligans of shortcomings, but likeable, pleasant, charming, beautiful people. this is what caused outrage. it caused. just some kind of anger, just some kind of avalanche of articles, and everyone was convinced that this avalanche is doubtful. bulgakov will crush the theater, as if he will throw this play off the stage, but nothing happened in the performance went through the day. it was impossible to hit with a sunshel, and i must say that bulgakov's life after that was very strong. changed in all respects in the material , so that it was very important for him, but he really almost completely changes his lifestyle, another apartment, other habits, other clothes, and even another wife is more such

a brilliant secular woman. her name was love evgenievna belozerskaya a, and she perfectly corresponded to such a period of bulgakov's. takeoff. this is generally a very important point, because we are accustomed to perceive the fate of mikhail afanasyevich as the fate of such an exceptionally unfortunate writer , hunted by soviet criticism of the soviet censored by the soviet government. this is only partly true, but there were gaps in bulgakov's life. and such a gap was quite long in the mid-twenties, when the play of the day of the turbine was on, when then the play of the zoyki entered the vakhtang theater, the apartment is also a very interesting work on the theme of the soviet moscow nep and in the chamber theater. there was a wonderful one, which was called crimson island. is it hard to tell if you knew or not? soviet criticism and did bulgakov himself know that the reason for his invulnerability in quotation marks was none other than iosile, stalin loved the theater, he loved classical

literature, and the theater also loved the classical , he loved the moscow art theater, and so stalin liked the play turbine days one way or another. bulgakov had a patron and there was an illusion that this would always be the case, but it did not last very long . in 1928, such a first bell sounded was banned, and the performance, or rather the play, which the moscow art theater began to rehearse, bulgakov’s favorite play, run, but, nevertheless three other plays by bulgakov were playing a and when, at the very end of 1928, stalin received an indignant letter from the group soviet playwrights, with such a cry as long as the best theater in the country goes on, an anti-soviet play. eh, stalin replied by the author of this letter. that you first learn to write, like comrade bulgakov, but nevertheless, literally 2 or 3 months pass and in february 1929. suddenly , an order follows to remove all bulgakov

's performances and for a long time historians, literature, could not understand at all what kind of fly had bitten stalin, and only during the time of perestroika a very curious literary document surfaced. it was a transcript stalin's meeting with a group of ukrainian writers, and and in this program, ukrainian writers simply in black and white, told stalin remove the play days of the turbine, as an anti-ukrainian play, and it is difficult to give in to stalin , whether bulgakov knew or not, e about this situation. well, here, what is curious is that it was at this time in 1929 that bulgakov came up with the idea of ​​​​the future novel the master and margarita, and the master and margarita often argue over there, it’s stalin, not stalin, that’s how this triangle seems to me. yes there is a ruler there is not a man to whom he sympathizes and there is a third force that hates this person and demands from the ruler that he punish yes pilate yeshua sanhedrin. it seems to me that a drawing of stalin

bulgakov and this is the ukrainian delegation, which demanded that bulgakov be removed. this is psychologically what will later fall. this is the basis of this ancient ancient storyline, and the novels master and margarita somehow bulgakov ended up with nothing in the truest sense of the word. but so far he has not given up, he has been working, and he is writing a play, which is called kabbalah is a saintly action takes place in france of the 17th century and the main character turns out to be the playwright jean-baptiste, whom molière simply adored. so he writes this play, brings it to you at the moscow art theater and that’s enough for you, they don’t even want to consider rehearsing it for a very simple reason, no matter how bulgakov emigrate to the past or to another country , the ears of modernity stuck out of this play and it was clear to everyone that this story , which is called the artist and power. and bulgakov realized that he did not understand at all. what to do?

that's what what to do next in life you are not printed. you are not put. you don't have any work and waiting for you, as he later writes in a letter. ah, the street of death, not an account in the letter , in which in a letter to stalin, again , bulgakov decides to write such a letter to stalin in which we lay all our grievances and ask at the end of this long , such a feverish letter. he asks stalin of two things. so let me go abroad. or give me some work here and otherwise i just died stalin and he answered, and stalin told him answered. all this happened in april 1930, and april 18 was good friday, which is interesting, and in bulgakov's apartment and since the call is stalin says, unfortunately, we do not have a transcript of this conversation. and we can’t say exactly what stalin bulgakov was talking about, we know about the content of this conversation. from the memoirs of two women,

bulgakov’s second wife, lyubov evgenievna, and here is the future third wife, and elena sergeevna a. but if you try to summarize, then the meaning was such that stalin asked if you didn’t really tired, comrade bulgakov and beyond. here i am saying, unfortunately, we do not know this exact dialogue, but then , as if stalin asks bulgakov so why do you still want to go abroad, or, apparently, stalin built the conversation like this. and besides, it was very unexpected for bulgakov. he did not expect this call. and bulgakov uttered a phrase. well, such a beautiful patriotic patriotic one, who will argue with her, but the meaning of the phrase was such that i thought a lot, i understood everything that the place was. russian writer in russia but i have nowhere there is nothing to work. and where would you like to work, comrade bulgakov but at the moscow art theater, but they don’t take me there. and you call there again, comrade.

bulgakov bulgakov calls you the next day. they say to him, where do you go there? come soon, there is a contract, passport data was dreamed of tin everything means we sign, e , draw up so, since 1930, mikhail bulgakov , who had previously been such a freelancer, and a freelance artist speak modern language. he becomes an employee of this here is a state corporation , which was called the moscow art theater and its life is very, but bulgakov continues to write and write dramatically, and plays and in particular he writes uh, a play about pushkin is absolutely wonderful. the play is called the last days. then he writes a completely wonderful play, which everyone, of course, knows, it is called ivan vasilyevich, and with this ivan vasilyevich it is very interesting. initially, bulgakov's play was called bliss and it contains the same story, as it were, a story, which means the inventor of the time machine work, who is there with him next to him, but is present, but if

in the famous film they go to the past during the time of ivan the terrible, then bulgakov they travel first to the past then to the future, they end up in communism, but the fact is that when bulgakov brought this bliss to one of the theaters , even members of the party told him here. i don't know what communism will be like. but there you are trying to reason, and then bulgakov cut it off by half, leaving only the historical part, which he gave to the theater of satire and in 1935, in my opinion, the rehearsals of this performance began. and finally, you were unexpectedly allowed to house a marrier thanks to gorky. gorky is here at the request of bulgakov, and so 19306 was supposed to be such a grandiose return to the soviet stage for the rich. what our hero is incredibly strong, but a dream. we continue. this is a podcast life of the wonderful and i'm

alexey varlamov with you and we are talking about mikhail bulgakov, and the premiere of malvir took place and the performance is not only a failure, but it turned out that there were several performances. then there was an article in the newspaper. true, which was called outward brilliance and false content, and in this article bulgakov's play was criticized as a play without an ideological idea. the soviet audience does not need such a play, and it is incomprehensible that it is so, sort of, like a beautiful spectacular costumes for the scenery, and the content of molière is shown . like some kind of philistine, somehow entangled in his own, but petty passions of a person. in general, bulgakov did not understand molière. the meaning of uh was like that and immediately this play was shot, it must be said that when this happened bulgakov was to say that he was angry means. to say nothing, he simply did not understand anything. in bulgakov, and took into account simple things. please the truth came out.

not just an article, an editorial was published, expressing the opinion of all the editorial boards and, again, in the newspaper. true, it is more powerful than 500 articles written in the twenties. yes, this is a sentence and, uh, smart people and stanislavsky nemrovich-danchenko. bulgakov perfectly understood this, but did not want to accept it. and soon, he himself had a row with a hut, but at the same time ivan was filmed in the theater of satire. vasilyevich was filmed at the vakhtangov theater in his last days. bulgakov became toxic ; it was simply dangerous to deal with him. and that's when bulgakov returned to writing the novel the master and margarita in my opinion. book well, how to say and margarita it's clear everyone has their own idea is stupid to impose their own, but it seems to me very sad. this is a very sad book. because if the white guard is a novel. about christmas that

was then the master margarita is the book of easter that did not come, that is, bulgakov is actually very honest, it seems to me, this one the strength of evil a and the weakness of the good that he saw around him. that was the basis of the basis of this novel. but the latest work of bulgakov - this is not a novel, the master and margarita although he finished writing it almost until his death. the most recent work. bulgakov is a play batum. a play dedicated to the young stalin, and very often biographers of bulgakov, historians and literature, they write about this plot with some kind of regret. well, that's what bulgakov lived a worthy life of a free independent. how much was it in those conditions, perhaps a person, but in the end he stumbled, made some kind of compromise and wrote here is a play prostalen. why, why

, from my point of view, to argue, so this means absolutely not taking into account bulgakov's psychology. here is bulgakov indeed, he was a man. let's compare him with akhmatova, let's say. he andreevna's life was much more difficult than bulgakov's. well, not to mention the fact that she had a son hostage, not to mention the fact that she did not have a comfortable apartment, not to mention the fact that her family life was far from well-being like bulgakov’s and what she had, how he was a wealthy person, all these fairy tales, that he was poor , these are fairy tales. he received a lot for you at home, then he found it. bolshoi theater, but nonetheless. so she did not consider herself the most unfortunate, but he believed, that's why, because from my point of view, akhmatova had already lived for eternity. she knew that she was akhmatova and no matter how they spread rot on her , no matter how hard it was, it was hard for her sooner or later everything would fall into place and a monument would be put up and it would be published and she would be honored, and she lived to this time. but bulgakov

could not do that. he would not be at all surprised that here i am telling millions of people about him. he is known and loved to be read. eh, they put on films , performances, write dissertations, translate them into foreign languages. here is this huge glory that fell on him after death. it wouldn't surprise him at all. she would anger him. she would piss him off. it's not even my guess. and there is bulgakov's correspondence with his young friend. uh, sergei ermolinsky, where bulgakov simply knows in black and white that u are heard around me unctuous voices, do not worry after your death. everything will be printed. he was furious at these words. he wanted to get here and now this in bulgakov, a very important detail, a very important psychological detail that must be taken into account just when we say why he had such an unsuccessful life. in a sense, he himself made it unsuccessful for himself, as it seems to me, the story of bulgakov is

in many ways such an ancient tragedy. yes, that's how in ancient tragedy the hero enters into a duel with fate, but history loses bulgakova this is the story of such a lifetime loss to fate. indeed, here is the same novel by master margarita, why did he begin to write it? it is quite clear that you will do something with this roman in the thirtieth , fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth year. where will you take him? it is clear that this novel is such a testament, here we are. uh, in the broadest sense of the word, but what does he care about our adoration with you? he wanted now, he wanted now to receive recognition. glory, he was poisoned. this is the thirst for applause, and she really was very characteristic of him. and she really poisoned his life, and why am i talking about this, because it was precisely this that was the motive for writing the play for the trampoline, because he wanted to break from this

play to the modern audience. he did not care, they would not accuse him of kalinism . it's all secondary. he wanted to get his here and now, and i must say that elena sergeevna that's why she doesn't love her, some. i'm long-term scholars, when he wrote the play batum, here she is two in a row here she said at every step, misha well done. misha write. misha come on, the play was written and the play. they brought you the moscow art theatre, the abhate will already drown. there, all the roles are distributed, and either sergeyevna has a presentiment that there will be a grandiose success. she is already distributing in her diary to be seen. uh, there are counterfeit tickets, which of the guests, where will they sit at the premiere. but bulgakov is more wary of some premonitions. well, it can be assumed that he knows one more very important thing. the play was being prepared for the anniversary, stalin's thirty-ninth year. and bulgakov understood, when there will be a premiere, stalin will come, and they will meet. here is his dream, his wish. here is such an idea fixed to talk, stalin

to talk with stalin yes, this will happen. well , further. i say, unfortunately it went or fortunately, because it's hard to say, but in any case, everything went far wrong, which means august 14th. in 1939, bulgakov , several more mukhatov theater artists went to batum, and in order to see on the spot some things necessary for scenery for costumes, uh, and so on. well, at the same time it was a pleasure trip and everyone was in a good mood. but when the train reached the station , serpukhov and the postwoman came in and said, who is the accountant here? what happened stalin read the play and, according to legend, said

it was not so, and in general, do not bless. and in general, this play was banned. again, historians, commentators. biographers argue that stalin did not like this play. uh, see some secrets and meanings in it are seen by some figs in their pockets. and there is a version that stalin’s youth was so rather doubtful and he did not want to refer to this period of his life, there are other versions, no matter how it makes no sense to discuss them, the fact remains that the play was banned. and this was the blow that bulgakov could no longer withstand. well, he just couldn't. after that, he, a becomes seriously ill. and a few months later, in march 1940, more precisely on march 10, 1940, and mikhail afanasyevich did not, and he died in sunday. but it wasn't easy,

sunday. it was forgiveness sunday. and for everyone who likes to criticize bulgakov sometimes from a christian church position. it seems to me that this fact, and it is necessary to take into account, and also take into account. what a huge price they pay, a truly brilliant person for his gift for his talent, with what blood paid for all these lines and all these books and performances and firms that still delight us and delight, as they will delight and delight our descendants. thank you, i was with you and alexey varlamov is a podcast of life wonderful.