he is not something that not everyone heard about him and the neighboring laboratory abroad. tomorrow the documents will be ready and preferably a couple of photos of my wife and son. never noticed your sentimentality. there's a big game on the air. as always, we have a lot to talk about. ukrainian rockets and artillery are already working not only in the donbass, but also in the territory of the traditional territory of russia itself, and russia withdraws from the treaty and finally withdraws from the restrictions on conventional non-nuclear weapons in europe uh,

henry kissinger turned 100 on saturday years. and nevertheless, he not only has something to say, but it makes a lot of sense to listen to him, but of course, the main thing, the event of the past days, is the presidential elections in turkey that really depended a lot on these elections, turkey, the black sea country, turkey controls the straits, turkey member. nato has close energy ties with russia and both turkey and russia are actively involved in the ongoing hostilities in syria to understand what happened in turkey and what it means for russia, an academician will help us vitaly naumkin scientific director of the institute of oriental studies and indeed from

my point of view. one of the most significant , perhaps, the most significant russian specialists in the east, you are very welcome . thank you. well, first question. what happened in turkey in terms of some impersonal victories or defeats, and what happened in turkey in terms of its future political course? well, what happened must, first of all, be said about it and apply it to the results of the parliamentary elections and their parliamentary part, where erdogan's party won the majority. this meant the victory of erdogan's course is his victory. foreign policy, but also domestic policy, because, of course, all

elections are always primarily focused on internal problems and uh, despite those difficulties and uh, even such tragic situations, especially related to the earthquake, uh, that befell turkey uh, amazing that, against this background, the victory was sufficiently e representative therefore the first. i would say, e is a blow to erdogan's opponents and therefore the course that his opponent symbolized lych darugu, uh, the first symbol, and the first step was this parliamentary victory. and the second was what happened, but what surprised me personally. this is that the gap was a fairly small gap. well, four percent is something there. and if you look at those 52-14%, then i must say that i expected more. it seemed to me that there would be a much larger gap, because, well, firstly,

the collective west worked in favor of his rival. uh, certain internal forces that really wanted to uh, there will be more curtailment. i waited because the leader of the opposition is a weak figure. they were looking for someone another leader and counted, of course, on the mist on the mayor of istanbul, but due to the fact that he is actually under house arrest, he is forbidden to participate in the elections. uh, they didn't find anyone better for free. well, he managed to, uh, unite the opposition, but we sometimes forget that one of the elements of his weakness, which i always have in mind, and this partly explains my expectations is that he belongs, in general, to a religious or confessional minority in turkey , which to a certain extent opposes the nita majority, which

erdogan's religious party is oriented. and uh, this minority is called alevis. quote dargu olivites olivites in turkey e, 5%. well, 5 6 and it was amazing that such a person? maybe, u get the support of the sunnitsky, uh, the majority, which did not happen, but what happened, what happened, therefore, this is possible. eh, it was some. i consider the signal to erdogan, but in general, his victory was natural and this explains why? i thought that he would get more precisely because of weakness, that is, dear who has them charisma is not good enough, the team clearly sympathized with him, of course, he was clearly supported by the united states at 100% why didn’t it work? that's why it didn't work, because the weak figure has no charisma, e

speaks to the people, he doesn't know how, and moreover, i've already said that, he represents a five percent minority. this sector is actually muslims, but some believe that they are not exactly muslims. maybe not even a muslim. these are some kind of sectarians. and if we remember the seventy-ninth eighties, when in turkey had mass pogroms of levites from outside, er, religiously motivated, er sunnis, then, it would probably be difficult to expect these people to win, despite the fact that of course they see themselves as heirs. uh, the founder of turkish statehood. e, despite the fact that they are called and they themselves sometimes see themselves as kemalists, but nonetheless. this is the weakness that is expressed in what is such mass support and great respect for him as a leader

and as a charismatic person who can lead people? i think it's kind of explains what i said, erdogan's rival emphasized that, uh, he will not escalate conflicts with russia but will definitely, in general, be less ready to cooperate with moscow than erdogan. and besides, he made it very clear that he was the person who could lead turkey to europe. that is, in other words , the turkish voter, uh, the voter in europe was not particularly in a hurry. so, turkish voters, that he was in no hurry to europe, this is one hundred percent. and there is nothing to argue. but there is one catch here, uh, there are many in europe. arthur is the turkish diaspora is people who have been living there for a very long time, several million turks in the main. uh community. e, who lives in

germany for this particular community, apparently. uh, daruglu college and the opposition made a bet , he went there, he actively worked with these people and uh, that's what i know from my turkish colleagues friends. uh, there was a full expectation that it was there that he would receive the absolute majority of votes did not work did not work out. this is amazing. i think, because, well, the appeal is still erdogan conservative, uh, religiously oriented values, idiosyncratic values, and rejection. that very, well, how to put it in quotation marks of culture, yes, european in fact, distorted and with all these unpleasant things like lgbt and so on, uh, and sets of marriages and everything else. i think that's all this pushed the turkish voter turkish

voters in europe although he evropeyizirovalsya and klych road. uh, he promised an alliance with europe that it would seem that the living turks should like it. i didn't like it there because they want, uh, to support those original values, uh, under the flag of which erdogan acts. and this rejection of, uh, the cultural dissonance that europe brings with it. i think she played, uh, a very insidious role in college calculations. i followed the elections closely, but i don't know much about turkish politics, so i may ask you a naive question. you have seen attempts to build a revolution in turkey before. you know, to be honest, well, there are always attempts on the part of those people, by the way, professionally engaged, but, uh, the turks were very well prepared to ensure that

such attempts were nipped in the bud, it seems to me, it seemed to me that if there were such plans, then they remained plans. and uh, as a matter of fact, serious attempts to arrange an orange revolution did not happen . that is, apparently this suggests that in order to build an orange revolution, well, not only a customer, but also, uh, you need some kind of. well, if you want, repin is absolutely needed, moreover, uh, some kind of double there was absolutely no support among the broad circles of the voters and some kind of penetration of the collective west among the elite. yes , this did not happen in turkey. badly. although, there are people who are sympathetic. here are those about whom you said i will not repeat, but they did not manage to ride some small wave of

protests that was there, except for this. uh, a significant part of the e opposition, which was also oriented towards islamic values ​​and focused on gülen, who is accused of having attempted a coup or lives in the united states here. this also worked. eh, against it. so you. and you want to, uh, arrange what happened in 2016 and uh repeat it and i think that um. if, as i said, such plans were the woman did not see. uh, there are no opportunities to be able to lead, as you said, some of these some masses that would go out into the street with someone, all the more so for the needy of the gift, they will not go verbs. president putin, congratulations, the rhodogan called him a friend and turkey is really the only one a nato country that did not impose sanctions against

russia at the same time, of course, it’s not for me to tell you that russian relations with turkey are, let’s say, delicate, not completely, simple and erdogan is a peculiar person. uh, manly tough ones don't always tend to smooth things over. and when he had sharp corners with russia, he seemed to show his , let's say, character. do you expect that now that he has won the presidential election? how did you remind us at the parliamentary elections? are you expecting? e that he will try to somehow reorient his foreign policy as if in the direction of russia or the united states well, firstly, it seems to me, so purely hmm mechanically, perhaps,

to reorient? it's already a bit late for him in february next year. he will have an anniversary of 70 years, he has experienced a lot. and during his political career he achieved a lot, did a lot and that's it. this convinces him that his course was successful. and just like that , some kind of strategic, i would not say, uh. such a dispersion of his course, when he acts, with some kind of foci here there is something did, this is not a multi-vector policy, as they sometimes say, if we are talking about external relations, but this is primarily following the interests that he considers as national and in this sense, those powerful economic ties with russia, orientation towards russia, which is and well, there is no need to repeat there about the same nuclear power plant. i think it reassures him that he is on the right track and expect

him to refocus on something. what he can reorient himself militarily . he also shows this. eh i would said, uh, the course towards some kind of following an independent, independently, understood , interpreted interest, which maybe uh creates some difficulties in relations with partners. uh, including with us, but i think that in general, uh, one can expect from him, on the contrary, deepening the course of close cooperation with our country, uh, the desire for which he has shown over the past years. i had to see him closely and communicate with him in 2005, the sixth year, when i was a member of the so-called high-level group alliance of civilization. he and i were then, i must say, amazed by his ability to speak with people and speak very clearly , so to speak, about those, uh, guidelines that he uh

offers as, then especially to establish relations with the west islamic world. he believed that he imagined he was, as it were, the main leader, the main leader. e of the islamic world. i think that these are also some of the philosophical, uh, concepts that underlie his politics. they will be strengthened continue, especially since now there is a new angle here. this is what he, like russia, thinks of turkey as a state of civilization. here, with a hyphen as well as e. vladimir vladimirovich says today that russia is not just a state. this is a state of civilization, there are few such states in the world who see themselves as such, and i

believe that this is a very correct vision, especially in relation to our country, as well as in relation to our chinese friends and partners india and turkey, as it were, is trying to be in that same row, and i think that is not without reason. and this, by the way, is the similarity of hmm such philosophical cornerstones, and in politics it will contribute to the convergence of our guidelines. which to interview with you, uh, i spoke to a russian official . and who told me that one thing in character in erdogan's behavior that moscow likes is that it can not always be easy to negotiate with him. but if he promises, he can rely on him, and then i spoke to a former american official a person who told me that this is a very

difficult unpredictable person. is it two sides of the same coin, or is it really e we see erdogan in washington and moscow in different ways. i think that what concerns russian turkish relations or turkish russian relations, yes. and here, just erdogan acts in the capacity, and, about which your interlocutor spoke in a conversation with you in a conversation with you in moscow interviews. yes, i'm sorry, but, probably in relations with the states. perhaps the unpredictability that your american interlocutor spoke about. she was looked through, because m-m they are dissatisfied with him very dissatisfied. this is a nato member who is so firmly on uh, let's say uh , defending his right to a deal with the s400, that, well, the americans can't do anything already? well, where is the unpredictability here,

the predictability of resilience, that's very very tough get your right to make a decision. i wouldn't say that there is, but probably, uh, those who don't like it, they can interpret it . that's how i looked at erdogan's speech and for his statements that concerned administrations beaten by the russian government. and there were situations when erdogan clearly did not agree with the russian positions, but i have never seen on his part, open, undisguised irritation and even more so indignation when i look at his statements of the united states, especially the administration of the bydne. it wasn't like that when trump was president. but when i look at his reaction to the batman administration, you know , sometimes i get the feeling that he just got fed up. no, i also have such a feeling, but apart from that, of course. this is purely personal

personal irritation, which he does not hide in relation to american leaders. however, a lot of people in the world have the same feelings for him, the american leader, and he also has a certain, uh, scores with europe, so i can refer to my conversation with one big turkish politician, who somehow. we spoke frankly and said, we know, we will never forget. europe as a colonizer of the colonizers of those lands that were the ottoman empire, and we will not forgive this, but your plus plus russia is that that it is in the middle east in the region where we live, where we have a strong position. she has never been an invader or an aggressor. and this is your plus and that is why you are loved and respected. there is also such a point years ago, uh

, a well-known turkish politician who was a member of parliament, but before that he held an official position, spoke at the center of national interests in washington. i also noticed anna's somewhat annoyed tone with regard to the united states. as you understand, no one added to them popularity. well, of course, and i asked what this is about, and he says, because the united states has misled us very much in syria, we would say, we never took the position that we took on damascus on the president. the siege if obama had not clearly said that he had to leave, and we understand that before the great power declares this, then she really is going to force him to leave, and then it turned out to be none. concrete actions, probably, but as if, uh, the complaint consisted,

not just in the fact that they said something, but that turks - they literally took it and began to actively operate in syria on this basis. well, then it turned out that their mother unwittingly let them down, returning to your then first question, you can say that you answered those questions about how the turks will continue to act in relation to both russia and the united states. within the framework of the impression that e left on them, the behavior of the americans, which they assess as a kind of betrayal. what is their position now? syria and how it works, well, not a partnership. it is some kind of interaction between turkey and russia. well, we are developing a good partnership and we are doing it. uh, very much our state. naturally, our

first, uh, foreign policy department is to try to bring the positions of damascus and enkara closer together. eh, somewhere a little something works out, something moves forward, but something doesn't. well, in particular, syria, not without reason, says that it could go for reconciliation, maybe even for closer relations with the turks, in that if the turks leave the northwestern part of syria if they withdraw their troops from there. and if they promise to at least do it in the very near future. well, as long as it doesn't work out, and while a certain one sometimes goes through a third party, there is a bargain. and if we talk about those that are known in the media about the meetings that took place, including in moscow, between the leaders of these countries, while

talking about the change in turkey’s difficult position and the change in the position of damascus, too, each country sees its own interests in their own way and in this case, we can only talk about the partial success of russian diplomacy. e, which is making great efforts to achieve this reconciliation, and cooperation between russia and turkey in many ways, including in the fight against terrorist groups and in maintaining some kind of stability. uh, this cooperation is ongoing and, in my opinion , has great good prospects, it can be assumed that now erdogan will be put under pressure from washington, uh, and not only from washington, to withdraw his objections to about the admission of sweden to nato and they say that new anti-terrorism laws have been adopted in sweden, which seem to meet

the concerns, what do you expect on this issue? well, it's hard to make predictions, uh , about something you don't have complete information about. it seems to me that, uh, firstly, the turks are very clear, uh, they make their demands on turkey, they just say, do this and that in relation to the kursk people there. e groupings. they know these people by name. and if someone stays there, they immediately, uh, declare a note, protests and so further. it's not so simple and the fact that sweden passed such a law there. uh, it's hard to expect that all the hopes that are placed on this, turkey, they will be, uh, fulfilled. it seems to me that, to a certain extent, if the turks withdraw their objections and, er, agree to the admission of sweden to nato without accepting their

conditions. this will be a certain loss of face for erdogan, who acquired his his in a new capacity after these successful elections. i think what to expect is that they now agree very easily, and with that and uh succumb to pressure in washington, which , all the more so, has no big cards in erdogan's relations now. i think that such uh trade is difficult now, because u will be a swede too. uh, it's difficult, given these requests for positions that they designated from them. and of course, looking from moscow turkey’s position on ukraine is of particular importance which, in general, compares very favorably with the position of most nato countries well, of course, it does not fully correspond to russia’s position

could you explain what the policy is erdogan in relation to the ukrainian conflict erdogan, in addition to, uh, the ukrainian conflict, there are certain uh of his uh, and phobias and his special uh interests, uh, which are very important for uh, his, uh, relationship with the population that he was voted for in the first place. uh, the fact that in a certain part of turkish society there are such uh dreams that crimea is a territory in which there should be very strong turkish influence and . uh, they can join the eurasian union. or maybe he did, i would be in their place. so the most

important thing is that there are none. uh, these were stolen by the nazis, yes, about whom we are talking, they are counting on the fact that the turks will help them in vain. uh, to support them in some way, what crazy plans about the crimeans, of course, about the drones. recently there was a message that these large bayrak dary, they were almost all knocked out in ukraine. i think that some kind of commerce may be continued by turkey, he believes that, well, they have the right. uh sell weapons, they are still on the market, there are, and so on, when you talk to them, here. some such sometimes, you hear the arguments, but i think they will not cross the red lines in terms of the quality of what they could sell to ukraine, they are not ah. as for the joint production of drones produced jointly between ukraine and turkey on the territory

of ukraine, there is nothing good in that. this is bad, but i think that once again turkey and erdogan personally are convinced that russia is a friend and that russian the leadership is friends of turkey and that is possible in the implementation of those plans that some groups have, uh, and maybe, uh, the base for erdogan's influence, especially military circles and military-industrial circles. i groupings on the interests of which he is here yes, in this situation about serves that they should, uh, be urged and try on these people. and maybe, uh, you can count on that not all plans. uh, will be implemented and in particular those that you understood. russia in the west is often accused of imperialism, but

it’s interesting that russia clearly has questions about turkey’s actions in both syria and ukraine, but no one, at least publicly, does not tell erdogan how he dares to behave like that , does not threaten him that there could be the most severe consequences do not read to him moral lecture. and when he behaves, well, as if retreating from western political correctness in ukraine , absolute hysteria immediately begins. and don't you think that this difference in approach is one reason why it is more comfortable for erdogan to have dealing with moscow than washington. this is probably so erdogan is generally more comfortable dealing with the sea than with washington. this is already clear. and all his behavior indicates that , uh, that he proceeds precisely from this, he is comfortable dealing with the sea. a very precise

word was chosen, but this does not mean that he is u ready. uh, you know, to give up everything from everything that would lead to accusations against him that he serves moscow, he fell under moscow influence, this may affect him to prevent him from consolidating internally turkish society, where there are different people, including those who are unfriendly to us, despite the fact that in general e in turkey treats us favorably. you understand today this section between russophobic and russophobic circles in different countries. eh, sometimes. it’s very volatile and but, but how are there some people who are not satisfied with erdogan’s friendship with moscow, and he’s some kind, maybe they as they say, he throws pieces, yes we have a case, but no more, i just if possible a little

a little to the side i'll go away. uh, here i got acquainted with the results of surveys in the small arabian state of bahri and only 1.5 million people live. and here, well, friendly, by the way, the state and not turkey and part of the islamic world. and there were rare surveys, generally very representative for this. and that's where the questions were asked, e, to the bahraini population. uh, the question is, what outcome of the war in ukraine would suit you. and bahrain would be satisfied, three-quarters of the population said, bahrain would be satisfied with the victory of russia with transfer gives control of part of the territory of ukraine is bahrain where there are three us military bases and quartered seven thousand us troops. and what can we say about turkey, where there is, even though it is a member of nato, but where there are a lot of annoying factors,

including the refusal to supply modern aircraft and various pressure factors, for the swedish factor, and so on. you see, today washington, uh, is failing. here in these attempts, uh, to involve the russophobic orbit, uh, the population of certain countries and leadership, but i repeat erdogan has to reckon with the fact that some people come from this and he wants to show himself somewhere as an intermediary to peacekeepers. well, i think that explains what he's doing. thank you . premiere welcome to visit us there works to be enjoyed. i 'll break you like a blockhead, so to speak. well , maybe he's a good guy, but still an idiotic colonel. are you okay. i say

steven but it's impossible, and he's childish does not understand at all. why, oh , kalina blooms, he says, we shot a movie that wasn’t beautiful for you anyway, it’s crazy to unleash the third world war, often it’s just the work of special services that scripts are ordered.

this is not your mother, it says that your parents are on sunday at the first o, a sale on the ozone floor rack for 3.599 children's pajamas mika yumi for 399 earrings sokolov for 599-year-old galina called to a meeting of the new village and suddenly her head was spinning at night her heart was only latting , then suddenly froze in the chest. did she fall in love did not know that the increase in rhythm or fading of the heart at rest. these are signs of cardiovascular disease. just pass the medical examination for free. have you messed up something? here on the site there are so many excellent housing options for recreation, something pulls somewhere on the street. i 'll find a sutoru with you where to stay again, emptiness in your calendar. this is the void in my heart. who is nagiyev’s assistant what is needed?

nagiyev’s assistant has three digits from my card, i’ll immediately connect the defender from the mts boss to him now it's clear. why didn’t anyone meet me at the airport, can’t part with me, he says, thank you lyosha for the premium defender. i'm telling you, eh fedya, and he called me my brother's stove. dima, what else are you doing here? how are you? not brotherly, dima, i have antispan here. now deciphering the calls, and these artificial intelligences soon noticed coffee for my beloved and only boss. such a sneak. no one will replace introducing the mts defender service artificial intelligence will analyze all calls and suggest a useful call or dubious, as well as block spam and send a transcript. now the defender is available in the subscription. cashback and installment plan for everything thomson refrigerator for 39.000 999 and even in

installment plan m. problems. the third column is ready for your fresh croissants and cocoa to go. welcome to the new gas station of the international brand the boil. here you waiting for friendly service cozy cafe and quality fuel. you were well, like the planet's home no, you need to eat a lot of healthy

fruits to be a healthy man. and delicious puree with them, even in space , is the time of renewal and harmony to your home. choose with discounts on wildberries in any incomprehensible situation. download the public service application. use the new service in the personal documents section to share data. whenever and wherever it is easier than it seems public services, a national project. digital economy, sometimes puzzled by similar statements in luhansk are allegedly required from parents by a bunch of russian documents so that their children are served in the hospital. it took me literally 15 minutes, the ukrainians

again sorted out all the facts thrown into the void for ten years. they also like to forge quotes, ukrainian bosalists. lenin will always be hated, because lenin created ukraine by the workers and peasants of the creator of ukraine - this is bad and dangerous actions are being struck, in donetsk were struck in mariupol in berdyansk. well , in general, more and more blows are being dealt. actually on the russian territory.

and not a for new territories, not for new subjects of the federation that have recently joined russia, but even for such areas a as belgorod bryansk course ruslan ruslan pukhov leading military expert how to explain this and maybe, uh, just uh, the press is somewhat exaggerating that is happening, but i have a feeling that ukraine, let's say, has increased the level of audacity and increased the level of their ability to carry a punch. in general, for civilians at objects that are not military and that this is happening with the direct help of the collective west, you know, well, such a bitter irony is that somewhere during the first year of the special operation we were lucky enough that the ukrainians did not there were missiles. eh, long range. now they have a small number of them. i really

hope that the british comply with the agreement on the non-proliferation of missile technology and the range. let these missiles not exceed, but 250 km. yes, 280, that is, up to 300. yes, therefore, all the same, the ability to apply deep into the territory is limited. great. and here's another aspect. why do they throw these punches? you know, in our circle of military experts, there is such a bitter joke that the ukrainians are attacking the russians in the same way that they fulfilled the minsk agreements, that is, the sponsors are primarily british. yes , uh, the balts, the poles are pushing them to attack , the ukrainians see a strengthened russian army, which sits in a strong strategic defense and is preparing to take them something like this the same as we received the germans in the forty-third year near kursk, so they are being carried. they understand that if this offensive is unsuccessful, there is no other chance. a. well , relatively speaking, they will not win back

the situation will pass. well, is it a variant of the korean war and the west will most likely force them, uh, to a certain truce, therefore , in order to demonstrate. western sponsors need to carry out such harassing attacks on their population. yes, this is how a cat touches water. yes, before entering. as you know, be able to swim, but not loves, but rockets are launched and somewhere there are such probings. something like, reconnaissance of the battle, yes, and in the hope of finding, but some kind of weakness in our defense, in principle, when there was that well-known offensive of the ukrainians in kharkov, then also the first week. they carried out such, uh, disturbing uh, reconnaissance of the battle, but they don’t give two bits for one beaten one, so i’m deeply convinced that in this case we will give serious imports, especially since the serious engineering structures built, as in the territory new subjects the russian federation and, in fact

, on the territory of the belgorod region, as well as other regions that are ecologically ukraine how can you give a port, and if they hit peaceful villages? i don't see how this can bring military advantages, but on the other hand, it's probably harder to fight. no, you know, there are a few here unknown to us, for example, but the ukrainians left. bakhmut aka artyomovsk but for a long time for a long time the road remained shot through by us, but not completely closed, although it would seem with the help of remote mining systems. it was possible to throw at minami why this was not done, either because we did not want to do this for humanitarian reasons, or because we ourselves were going to attack along this road, unfortunately, in this fog of war there are several, but elements, to which it is impossible to give an answer, several

assumptions can be made. yes, but, unfortunately , it is impossible to give answers to all questions, and the one who says that he knows them is either mistaken or just lying, but still i want to understand, a these are strikes on a deliberately correct object. they can be explained, but as a military operation, well , the system just didn't work. uh, they can be explained, how terror can be explained, as a combination of both, maybe there is some other explanation. my explanation is that apparently there was some kind of, uh, unwritten agreement by the americans, both with the main ones, so to speak, curators of this event, that they will not strike at our main territory, but will concentrate. well, as a matter of fact, only here in uh in a traditional theater there is no includes, crimea from their point of view. however, uh,

apparently this is the case where you know the bull terrier. having fallen, the owner already pulls him back, but he still rushes forward and bites the leash and snaps at the owner. and here is the montage, uh , that the ukrainians arranged, and the statement of senator lindsey grm is also part of this one, uh, as if the system when a vassal, relatively speaking, tries to dictate. eh, my conditions, sir, i have such an explanation, but i can’t, so to speak, give my hand to cut off. andronik andronik migranyan is a well-known and highly respected expert in united states and international politics in general. you have lived in the united states for a long time, you know many american politicians, officials, how do you imagine us-ukrainian relations, and more specifically, uh, when in the white house and in

the pentagon and in the city of the department they do not publicly say that the united states does not they approve of ukrainian strikes on russian targets, when they say that such actions are not supported, and then these actions are not only repeated as their number grows and grows and is growing. how do you explain? why american statements? why are they not followed by a call. eh? gentleman from zelensky and we could say, listen if you want to have our support. never do that again, apparently, there has never been such a call, that there has not been and will not be dmitry, moreover, i must say that ruslan said that there was supposedly

an installation. e utterances are sagram from such utterances. i listened to dozens in the us congress. that is, every second american politician who supports ukraine is also believes that this is the most effective use of funds when you weaken and destroy your potential opponents with the wrong hands, so i must say dmitry a. now i return to a direct answer to your question, and do not lie, that is, american officials who say that this should not be done. here's what you don't have to do. in kiev, they understand very well, they say it, in fact, or they say it, but if you do it and you succeed, you are great. well, if you do and will

failure, but we will scold you, but that's all. nothing else to take. punishment. there will be no punishment. this is absolutely. i 'm not talking about the fact that in many issues this is already on fox. it seems that way, many others said that this administration is lying on every occasion and on any issue, and on the issue of ukraine, all the more they lie. instagram was mentioned and yes, you know him. i saw him. there i met him before my very eyes. john mccain is correct not only that, i must say that he was john's six mccain i'm sorry, but he really was a junior senator, mccain was already a legendary man, and he followed him. just like the tail of laziness. let's play. this is an odious person. uh, he's got an absolute extremist temperament and always has been, but he's always been

a six. here is my impression. here he always has. here, while mccain was alive, he was mccain, as it were, his mentor, and he was behind him , here is mccain, here mccain was friends with lieberman. and now the screenwriter and laziness was the third, but already so, of course, too small and of course, he is his everything. then he thinks, he speaks to him , and, of course, he thinks and speaks, complete insanity. here among the republican party and the senator in the republican - this is the most odious person. here are two about him, if we compare there is such a good expression about biden, what is 40 years? being in the senate. this was said by the man who is good. you know, uh, you know well, and in

general, i. you got to know me. that's what secretary of defense bob gates said. i have seen him for 40 years and not once has he made a single judgment and not a single sentences that would not be idiocy, that is, they call him the forty-year-old sea moran , that's just an idiot, just a moron, because he never says anything out of the blue when he returns. uh, to lindsey thunder. i will say, uh, two things first, i don't know exactly what incigram said, but i know that if he didn't say what is attributed to him or said it in a different context, then he had a great opportunity to make a statement that he he didn’t say that he doesn’t think so, and more specifically that he doesn’t. this cannot

be united states policy. recommend. whoever you were to kill russians or people, any other person on lnosti did not take advantage of this opportunity. and now i want to, a, show you one segment that shows why i believe that the united states is no longer responsible for this kind of action. here, let's see what the head of ukrainian military intelligence, general budanov, said . which place in crimea will you go after the victory, sevastopol is definitely in sevastopol. is this my hometown? i was born in kiev, but all my childhood was spent there, what, there are 3 million not very loyal people will return. it's not just not loyal, it's people with a modified psyche already, and what to do with them? it is very simple to bring to fair responsibility. fair responsibility in our

understanding for certain people for their actions can only be physical destruction. imagine this. if such a statement, uh, made, uh, any other, the intelligence chief of the country of the satellites of the united states is completely country completely dependent on america, there should be a short call from zelensky and tell him. yes, expel you’ll put this case in some position, that it’s people who work there for you, but we didn’t hear any condemnation at all, and as andronik said, not only we didn’t hear any public condemnation, but we don’t see any signs that the administration considers this kind statement unacceptable and considers himself bound positively, of course.

we'll be back in just a few minutes. woman i need a visa-free regime. we don't need direct flights. what are the roots of such an ardent, russophobia her homeland is not in in any case, not georgia. she is of french origin. she studied at the institute of political studies in paris. they brainwash you so much that it is almost impossible to wash them later. the decision to leave came from my grandparents . after the outbreak of the soviet-polish war. she absorbs the idea, but she did not give citizenship. none other than mikheil sasha and mikheil saakashvili, she graduated from columbia university, and he the forge of training, and the leaders of the countries

which the americans need to appoint and install to fulfill their positions. we need more we need the president of georgia has betrayed the georgian people of georgia salome zurabishvili french. what is the message of the heir doll? tutti tomorrow on the first o, sale gifts, like this all year round o sale on the ozone garden trimmer deca for 999 men's sneakers for 4.99 brazier for the upper room for 799, holidays and repairs and other plans are dedicated.

will it ever end no traffic then on the video is endless. you can watch video endlessly. just choose a dragon in the tariff where beeline is on your side. it's okay, i've never had it before. i wake up so much earlier than before to rise above myself and find the strength to find the strength to put off devoting time to myself when sport is the norm of life. i don't care. find the energy for the norm deficit by the rf window mam dad. and that in space there are stars of the planet,

there you need to eat a lot of healthy fruits to be healthy and delicious fruto purees with them even into space. this is clothes for the real life, superior to any other feeling of coolness even on the hottest day gloria jeans for the price of one application. fate sends you a sign. and you sit and do nothing. enough. download the national lottery app and play when your luck smiles. misha play very on special terms. does he personally every

smartphone in fix price stores set of travel bottles, for only 124 rubles. disposable brushes. for only 55 rubles. cosmetic mask for only 149 rubles. fix. the price for everything is low. price also want to relax especially. on edge zone open and relax. book cheap tickets, hotels tours on ozon have everything you need for your bedroom. only now a double bed with a mattress for only 18.990 rubles. experts in the field of sleep to resolve issues, look, videos of powerful smartphones and stylish tablets at attractive prices already take your bank 120 everything and cancel interest on everything for one, two, three 120 for everything in rosbank .

get cashback for every cup. buy 120 days without interest, rosbank credit card 120 for everything without percent of the request, the real opportunities of the premiere on football with denis kazansky on sunday at the first first annual award of the russian premier league winline rfpl heroes choose your superheroes now with us in touch from washington mark bishops of the famous military international expert in the recent past observers of the national interests. mark is very happy to see you. thank you

for taking the time and i have a short question for you dmitry good evening, as always, it is very pleasant to talk with you. i i think at this stage it's obvious that there will be some kind of contract. uh, kenin, makar, and the speaker of the lower house of representatives. eh, already talks about it as almost a guaranteed fact. uh, last i heard, they're left with a disagreement about about $80 billion that the republicans want to remove from the budget from the democrats want to keep, but basically i'm in agreement. e has been reached and i expect them to announce this formal agreement. uh, next days to many republicans. i'll mark dislike the terms

this agreement. they believe that they gave away cards with games. uh, too many concessions and got too little, based on what they thought he had. eh, basically. greater degrees of leverage to put pressure on the white houses on biden, uh, assuming the election cycle starts again in 2020 and biden is running for president. well, you are right, for sure, that, as in most agreements, when there was a particularly heated dispute, neither country is completely dissatisfied, but am i right? i understand that if you look at the situation from moscow, then, of course, you are especially interested. are there any plans to limit the military budget and limit with the help of ukraine that there is nothing like that in this agreement. no, e macart insisted, uh, uh

regarding a number of internal issues and the question of how we are rolling building an internal jacket, but there is no evidence that there were negotiations between how much uh? and what are we sending to ukraine, so uh, there is no reason to think that anything will change. uh, while the next budget cycle. eh, i think the biden administration will be free to send, uh, almost anything they want. max thanks, turned on saturday, and such an age is quite respectable, but what is incredibly accidental is in the first place. who has fully retained the brilliance of his intellect his ana?