the dimness of the ideal associated with the high christian sense of the eternally feminine mother of god, of course, in its origins, but also identified. uh, i wouldn't be here to overcome this biat very strongly from the troubles of speech. so. uh, it's just serious there. and here it is a little bit in the playing field don quixote is partly a trickster of that, dante who visited dante's purgatory paradise is thus correlated , that is, tithes, and don, quixote, of course, yes with dante, because it is simply that cultural language in which e is undoubtedly the sideboard owned of course today we gathered our thoughts about the great novel of cervantes don quixote archimedrite semyon tomachinsky vadim

vladimirovich polonsky i am vladimir of the left yes, we continue, but about uh hmm don quixote and sancho pantsy. yes, two points. we still can't do it anymore. but but really e , today we have already heard. what is rustic? maybe even stupid there greedy or just greedy, sancho by the end of the second volume turns. well, almost really, not a biblical sage, which is on this pseudo-island, so to speak, when the head. yes, he does make some wise decisions in general. every time i re-read it, i'm sorry that he leaves from there. and what are you playing? he? well, how can you be so cool, you have already begun to manage here and donkey, whose course is very often very much compared with christ, these parallels. how do they respond to you in general? well, with christ, of course, it can be strong. now i don’t even know, it’s clear that it’s not with the theologian. from point of view asks, yes, well, the fact that sancho panza, of course, is also an extraordinary figure, who also devoted himself to serving his

master. although he doesn’t even consider this directly as his master, he had every right to. there, at any moment, leave him and i don’t understand at all, he understands very well, in general, what it is, what it is nonsense, that this is some kind of foolishness and so on. well , you understand this question, that is, he seems to understand, but suddenly, but it seems to me that it ’s absolutely not because of some kind of mythical governor. he goes, because there are some moments it is clear that he is close . eh, here's to some respected person. e friend. yes, you can say e in this one, the enterprise of which he does not even really understand the meaning. it seems to me that this is his devotion. and it's not some kind. here is such a dog he has criticism there. scolds there, maybe there even gouge there and so on. that is, it's not some kind of. here. eh, blind let's say obedience. yes. eh,

if we introduce this terminology, and this is a conscious choice of love to follow don quixote. and in this, of course, he is absolutely amazing and what is the nature of their relationship, and he changes throughout this big book, sancho panz, a vassal of this knight. here, however, duality is important here, as banks are a move, he and a madman, when it comes to chivalry and a sage, so is sancho, he and uh, a simpleton , a pragmatic greedy man, uh, and one who is capable of selflessness serving uh to their own e, and to see things they are united by the fact that they are e, so it is said brains. dial yes, they are from peaceful wanderers one for the sake of fame and the other, and in fact such love, of course, if love for this uh for this person is there for his son. well, at some point they grow together so much that one did not introduce itself without the other. and by the way,

in those chapters where they diverge. eh, it feels like something is not that broken, something is starting to be missed. yes , sancho actually already has him both at the beginning of the novel and at the end of the novel. he is dual. he, of course, e changes, but less than income. i said so. well, he's already been solomon. he had already so vaguely spent the islands in other situations, he showed his module. let's have the final then. let's see, there, of course, he is very hard going through the death of his friend and suzareno, but at the same time he perfectly manages to get drunk on pizza. yes, otherwise he was not himself. he remains confident in himself. it's amazing . it's like an artistic find. it's a find , this pair that complements each other, yes, but you know, in terms of reader's reaction. i so, well, i try to re-read this great book with some regularity and and here are my personal sympathies. here are the involuntary ones that arise. yes, when this violence is the violent charm of the image. yes, for me they

have moved quite clearly from don quixote to sancho here. if at the beginning i was somehow here i was much closer interesting i followed. so i involuntarily responded to don quixote now to sancho, you know what other thought is very expensive. mm someone said they don't. nothing more important than talking to each other to each other. that is these are people about dialogue, these are people who are constantly in dialogue. yes, it’s really a wonderful thought in general and between themselves and the mutual complement of these opposites , as if there are some meanings, after all, they argue there and so on swear and so on, but they also speak some very important thoughts. eh, maybe this is just the main thing, er, there is a charm of this work. here in their combination in their common communication and in the fact that i like from this unity it’s just a dialogue, as life shows - it’s not so simple thing. and this is a great value. i think

people can keep the possibility of dialogue. yes, and here it’s also so masterfully done, and there they themselves sprinkle a little endlessly with sayings. yes, all the time in general, uh, in spanish culture, sancho is a folklore name, and a lot of all kinds of small folklore genres are associated with it, in which one way or another i asked him about such a simpleton, yes, well, or just like a simpleton. yes, it says. eh, often these sayings are completely meaningless. but really like e peas in egrmushki you understand, and because of this, he scolds the income more scolding than laying. here but this is a meaningless saying. this is his pragmatic grounding, which means stupidity. yes, and so on, somehow it turns out to be amazing, but malleable for, uh, quite serious, very deep. the dialogues with don quixote are simply extremely subtly done. this is where

nabokov is completely wrong. it's not that it's not that, he didn't see that cervantes is thinner than flaubert in these things, you understand, we don't have much time left. i know literally dotted line. i would like to say a few words we have already come to this a little bit , but i will not talk about the literary children of don quixote now , because this is an eternal image and images that live independently, we will probably have to once again collect our thoughts on this topic . i just wanted to ask hmm do you have here some favorite children of other hunting. i'll start the actual confession. i love the japanese author very much and all the sakuenda e of the remarkable japanese catholic writer of the 20th century aroma of the fifty-ninth, in my opinion, 1950 the ninth, dear mr. fool, who , when we were translated for some reason, said that this is xp there is something like that, although this is obviously completely. that is dostoevsky's idiot, but by and large it is don quixote, so to speak, in the limit, that hero who, ah, so it turns out, do

you have any favorite donquixotes in the netherlands, he already sounded today, of course, myshkin she is dostoevsky this is the most obvious image, but if we continue the theme of idiots, yes, it was so wonderful even french author of the 20th century is recent. uh, because i was an idiot, now i don’t remember his last name, but also, yes, something from this series , uh, so immediately more and and you, uh, really love the heirs. e other hunting in the english classic novel. here's from fielding what's called here uh it's joseph andrew it 's andrew from dickens to pickwick, and here, well, here are the figures of pastors weirdos of the strangest pastors oh tar. yes, it's such a gallery, very interesting very

curious. for me, this is very warm. the heirs of don quixote and warm - what is it, so, without big claims, you understand without uh hanging over the abyss of risk here. uh, so muted in english is good, worcester type will do. well, by the way, by the way, yes, of course, absolutely. you see how we turned, and yet our dear lev nikolaevich myshkin and here he is in what kind of dialogue with don quixote is the prince. we already have a poor wind. hmm, it's difficult, but it's more like this for dostoevsky and for three daughters. uh, such a kind of landmarks with which they constantly compare the prince, and well, dostoevsky , of course, was called prince christ in the manuscript christ and uh similarly, he saw uh,

don quixote and, of course, his famous words that if a neighbor clearly proved that the truth is not with christ, then i would rather remain the truth. yes, this is don quixoteism. for dostoevsky, it is connected precisely from the tower. this is not a dialogue for us. it's like, he's more like an emanation even in them there in general for the author. well, the last question then. and we have marked so many forks, yes, but the question is this, and it is clear that every time every generation, yes, it reads such great books in my own way. and he learns something about himself, including about his time. so, how do you think that today with the help of donhot we learn about our time and about ourselves, well, are we mired in consumerism? i now as already accusatory paphos yes. yes, one has to hit something to slap into the finals to really exercise.

yes, but in fact, it is true that a person, uh , for the sake of an idea, let there be the most crazy uh, for the sake of ideals, let's say so. uh, he is ready for anything, for any sacrifice and they leave their property , all their property. eh, that's another matter. here again, i repeat, what follows after this, how wise it is, how correct it is, but here is his inner readiness for a feat. such is the e, which we now clearly lack for everyone, i first of all speak to myself in relation to don quixote, and today in a tragic situation. because we really need those knights who will pounce on these mills and show that in fact this is the truth giants of modern civilization. she is like that. yes, this is where it seems, the mill is there, there evil giants are super, but on the other hand. i am the scariest things in the modern world can be done in

the name of an idea, and this temptation was deeply and well heard by the culture of the twentieth century. but uh, let's say the hero cherengur cherengur, then platonov is the heirs of don quixote too. yes, here. well, we have to come up with the need for a savior don quixote, and he can be a terrible substitute, so to speak. thank you very much in one vladimir vladimirovich pavlovsk archimandrite, semyon tochinsky. i am vladimir vladimirovich, today we gathered our thoughts about the great romance of cervantes be sure to re-read don quixote, if you have not re-read it for a long time, friends, if you like to gather your thoughts with us, then all the podcasts of our program. you can find one tv.ru on the website of channel one.