the nature of the war right now, in the twenty- third year, there is a lot to talk about on this topic. where it moves forward backwards sideways, because, well, those, uh, you actions that we are now observing, generally speaking, no one has been preparing for them for many, many years or even decades, they thought that this was impossible. it remained in the 20th century. here you are. pentalgin is a remedy for various types of pain pentalgin acts against pain, wherever it is, regardless of the causes of its occurrence pentalgin we can do without pain sale from 14 june you will have time for 2.799.

khayali olive oil for 399. the tinkoff application brings joy to people tinkoff he is the only one with age, changes in vision can change the usual things, then the fund was created to nourish the restoration and preservation of youthful eyes, it is recommended to apply daily for 3 months, then it is now in a new package specifically for course application. enjoy a delicate curd dessert with delicious chocolate or crispy balls, bring it and let the whole world wait. how much is friends dosage

substances? the tinkoff app brings joy to people tinkoff is the only one syoss professional quality , understandable in any language syoss color protection technology retains brightness for up to 12 weeks radiance shine of dyed hair syoss professional, as always, everything boils and diarrhea filtrum thanks to millions of micropores

filtrum absorbs bacteria toxins, helping eliminate unpleasant symptoms. you filter in order to visit the usual things in your stomach.

the tinkoff application brings joy to people tinkoff he is such one pentalgin extragel, it has a special component for better penetration into the focus of pain and inflammation against pain and inflammation in muscles and joints today we gathered our thoughts about what is happening with international relations in the modern world fedor alexandrovich lukyanov international observer andrey andreevich sushentsov of the deans of the faculty of international relations gemoy. i'm vladimir legaida, continue andrey andreevich when you talk about the school of realism. yes, there are other schools, but some kind of productive dialogue is possible between them, and to what extent it is of practical importance for real diplomacy. i believe more meaningful for real diplomacy. this is the experience

of the national experience of the experience. elite existence in the international environment that is given in reality we observed a lot of experiments in the nineties and two thousand years, especially from small countries that recently gained independence, which tried to import foreign policy along with sometimes a diaspora textbook professors, there are separate caucasian republics suddenly introduced themselves to some there a small western european country with a different neighborhood belt with a different economic environment with different security threats and tried to behave somehow differently. yes, countries invent themselves in their circumstances. but hmm, remember that each country is an experiment and the final is open to it and the elite. testing boundaries. perhaps they are this experiment. here they test the strength of the state. how did the experiment survive if it went through a series of major trials of invasions of the revolution of economic turmoil. uh, some

catastrophic natural events and so on and so forth and there is on the part of the state. let's say micronesia yes, a very special foreign policy environment there is a state in africa there is a state in southeast asia latin america for each of them as a whole the world looks a little different and for them, uh, some kind of universals, about which we are talking here and now they can wear their own shade, but if we talk about the basic, er, postulates of the struggle for influence for the status of military-political rivalry, then in general they develop approximately one and the same rules. there are laws there, like, uh, there is current in an electrical outlet, if something is there, it means to climb with a sharp nail, then from there a current will strike and small countries, some of them had the misfortune to experience for themselves. what is it exactly, or tok e, in the 21st century, there are still outlets. yes, it's still getting worse. and this invention of the bicycle brings them back a little, uh, to reality and to the tradition

of a realistic understanding of what your external political potential and resources are. how should you formulate your interests, and this always very subjective. you can express it in many different ways, and together it puts us all together. well, in terms of the degree of realism of your policy, there is, for example, a small country in the middle east, israel, which, in terms of the totality of its foreign policy resources and foreign policy experience in its short period of existence, falls into some such line. can give a head start. uh, many long-standing countries. yes, they went through a lot of crises on their own , they emerged from them, continuing to divert such a rather active line to the external political and what is called they play for their own e, their vital interests are constantly on the eve, uh, and the measure of their e is such a tendency to fall into an illusion, it is very low, strange in another international environment. and where there are less threats, they can afford the experiment. and tell me, but, uh, again,

the changing context and conditions in which we exist here is the information society, yes, about the impact. e of the new information space on domestic politics, well , dissertation diplomas are already being defended, with some i even had a chance to get acquainted. and in general with all the critical attitude to what they are trying to analyze, so to speak, but this influence exists. here is the changed information environment. what impact does it have, and again on international relations, if at all it has to what andrey just said in many ways, but if in the most applied, then let's say the work of diplomats has become absolutely unbearable, that is, classical approaches, then there are these means, yes, because we know from books, but this is nothing and there is no discreteness and privacy. no, on the contrary, he spat out something so fried faster than you, like, how much more

. and constructivism, which generally speaking is correct, means andrey called a small country, which he imagined himself to be an eastern european paradise. now, unfortunately, a long-dead, accidentally bright, witty person. such was the businessman in socks and benduki, yes, who left for that same country in the middle of the 2000s as a minister, he set off reforms - then he brilliantly formulated it. here is this phenomenon, when relations with russia began to strain there, then the boycott of the embargo and so on, and he said at some meeting. listen, let's imagine that there is a sea there is no russia there is a sea. we don't look at it at all. we live as if these are the squintosen. let's pretend that none of this exists. and it seems to me that this is the triumph of such an approach, which admits that one can imagine there

really the sea. this is a product of the information era, because the information era it actually constructs everything around us is already disorienting to a greater extent, but it further disorientates from the beginning, then you get used to it, you already understand what actually is. and where is she not to start diving into this sea? just andrei andreevich correct me. if i misunderstood you, somewhere i met the idea that this is one of the characteristics of the information society, when you feel like a participant, yes, in terms of international relations. it's a total illusion because, of course, no actor of international relations. there, an ordinary observer is not here in domestic politics, after all, this is a little bit wrong. or i'm wrong. well, how else to interpret this wave, when people celebrate some event on themselves. uh, in social networks there are certain images of their picture avatar, they perceive themselves as participants in this process. it affected my feelings of thought i imagine myself as an actor. then these

many are not actions. many people on the dashboard. clicked on button. sympathy. here in connection with something there are terrorist attacks, let's say, right? or vice versa, there is some kind of celebration, uh, a major conflict. here is the united states of great britain, some western others, artificial in the information war. countries. they are now , uh, very good at directing, uh, the flow of emotional reactions of citizens, english-speaking in the west and other regions of the world, to the way they need to perceive what is happening in ukraine , moreover, an intuitive person. maybe u understand that this is the picture that he contemplates, it does not correspond to his deep intuitions about what is happening, but since there are very logical, seemingly such constructions in the synonymous row, he intellectually does not find. e opportunities to disagree with this. and i think that this is just another one of the means of international relations that needs to be well understood. and

gradually master this tool and work in this environment. well, that is, is it so or does it still affect. it seems to me that it affects more than we would like and than we think. i remembered not so long ago incident. in general, at the g20 meeting in indonesia, this was filmed by a cameraman, so a very funny skirmish between chinese president xi jinping fell behind the property of authority. and, for example, canadian minister justin trudeau, but the day before they had negotiations. well, normal negotiations with closed doors and xi jinping contrary to chinese tradition in general. he approached the work at the reception and said what kind of disgrace it is, why what we discussed yesterday today in your newspapers is not done the way it is, as this and the trium are looking at it. he sincerely does not understand. what is the problem with grandpa in general, why why is this happening not because the labor idiot is there or he is a boor, just for him, like the whole generation

of politics. especially. he is, well, quite young. well, as it were, but he's done well. legitimation is commented - this is a constant reporting to the public, what am i doing? look here. so i talked with see, here i am , this is what we discussed. here i am to him and this one , contrary to the whole tradition. here, and the axis of the classic, but between us, we talked with you, this is confidential, but serious things and here is this clash. and this is just a consequence of the fact that the very people who put up avatars, they influence, because they form a mass that a politician , somewhat conditionally speaking, china has sounded. let's talk about the east a few words. let's say sergei vyacheslav speaking here, and at the un recently said yes to the western minority, which should be more attentive to the majority. i remember, we once talked with you, and on similar topics he said that we were all the time. well, it was a few years ago we were talking to the west, eh

the chinese - this is incomprehensible and not very pleasant, what awaits us here. i think our challenge is. that the chinese and indians, other than the west, perceive the russian western confrontation as an episode of the struggle within the west, and we need to work with this perception to show that we are not the west, that we are there in the north let's say or what, we are the leader of this world majority or someone else the original state of civilization is written in the same new concept. well, let's say yes, but this is the perception in which they feel what is happening, in fact. it's a white conflict civilization within itself about, in general, not even ideological essences, but there is a dispute between economic entities. although uh, westerners are trying to present it as an ideological struggle. on the contrary, we will need to show that what is happening goes beyond the struggle. so inside western civilization. this is essentially such a long confrontation about the principles, uh, on which international relations in the 21st

century will be built unipolar and or polycentric here, of course, we are like-minded with india and china and, of course, what is happening, the main new feature is that for 500 years, in reality , significant centers of economic political military gravity arise. in the east , the east becomes for us an important and large new value that we need to know. but the danger is the one that we identified here in this recent western projection. yes, when the world was offered a certain unified logic of life, yes, a single system of values, or the only one, more precisely, yes, here it is here on the path where it rises, so to speak, the sun in the east is not waiting for us. uh, it seems to me not, because it is a feature of the western world of universalism and the belief that this cultural ethical system is the only correct one, and therefore it should be

extended to everyone, but it started. uh, probably from the campaigns of christ and the great geographical discoveries, where there was, so to speak , a large economic subject element, maybe the main one, but it was all packaged. here is this civilizing mission. the east lives differently, the east is not a single conglomerate. it's a lot of different cultures sometimes with each other. well, completely, if not alien, then very far from each other, and the meaning of this very term is the world majority, which we have, as the western majority, should not be confused here with the fact that this is some kind of consolidated one. yes, the essence of the world majority, as well as multipolarity, is that no one imposes anything on anyone. and we also do not impose anything on anyone, and not only because it seems like we have nothing to carry now, but also because no one needs it, there is no demand, for this the americans already faced. if someone tries to carry his torch, he will face the same thing.

today we have gathered our thoughts about what is happening with international relations in the modern world fedor aleksandrovich lukyanov , international observer andrey andreevich sushentsov, deans of the faculty of international relations to the hero. and vladimir gogol continues, we often talk about, but in this new emerging system of international relations, what is the place of russia or what should be the place of russia, as theologians would say, but in fact i want to ask you what a place should not be. that's who we definitely don't need to become. here in this new emerging degree. we cannot become a power of order. we are in the current border, as a country has existed since about the period of peter i. but here we are, as a large large state, a large center of gravity in the north of eurasia, must be in the top three of the top five, and the world powers

must remain subject in the struggle of these great countries. we roughly understand how demography will develop until the middle of the century, how will economically trends look like uh? we hope more or less predictable, now politics will line up on the horizon. there, for a decade or two, russia must retain its subjectivity. it must be a strategically sovereign country that excludes the possibility of dependence. from someone was not to maintain this autonomy the ability to choose the possibility of plowing their own destiny of the twenty-first century. i would say the same thing in a slightly different way, we cannot be anything addition to avoid addiction it is impossible to always be in what you are dependence on someone here is just a task, so that then there would already be more of them, so that different dependencies would balance each other, because if you say so, well, in the most caricature form, the raw material appendage of the west turns into a raw material appendage of china, this can be internally pleasant for

for a number of reasons, but this does not change the essence, but like russia, if glory to you and the west, god still did not become final, and the second will not happen, therefore, this is independence and the opportunity to always carry out some kind of maneuver. this is this certainly thing. well, this is actually what andrei said, but purely like this, uh, philistine. it seems to me that in no case should you fuss, because when such a country is gigantic, and in fact, possessing everything. as soon as possible, they start fussing there to suddenly react to the fact that in general such countries should never react and join. like, well, i don't know, but uh, it always surprises me when journalists call me and start asking. but the prime minister of slovenia said, this one, well, baby, he or there is some kind of congressman, this is what we have. it is connected with the west. nobody ever asks. but in vietnam they said something, this is the eradication

of a certain complex, which in fact no longer has any basis. but it, apparently, was laid down precisely by years of confidence that our development can only be catching up, therefore, even if something was blurted out in slovenia, then we need to somehow , perhaps, sharply give an angry rebuff, but still, here, it seems to me that this is the buzzword. first of all, it is distracting. secondly, it is degraded. i don’t need to remember this wonderful one, what is it called? meme? yes, when two buddhist monks are sitting there. they say they say i watch the trees grow. he says you're all in a rush. yes, this is a very important and interesting topic for me. here in this new history, the emerging system of international relations. religion, as an ideological basis, what role can it play? we can probably say cautiously that religion is returning from the periphery of socio-political relations to its in the center, our colleagues from mgimo even talk about the webonization of religion, that is, the use

of religion as a weapon. that's what awaits advanced western neurolinguistic techniques in this sense . they work directly. to indifferent perception of what is happening and carving emotion emotions are the fuel of action due to the fact that the techniques of working with e, the human mental structure, they become more perfect. i think a lot instrumental approaches to getting people motivated by 10 and sometimes covering. it's the religion you're talking about that it's religious motivation, yes religious motivation is pseudo-religious motivation. yes, i do not rule out that religion in the east , including, can become such an active force that will uh, well , motivate certain political programs there,

india gave such an example, especially since there is no such differentiation that we are used to in western world. yes, that is, religion, as with exactly this, after all, in the first place. eh, for- western heritage is such a society. well, first of all, there is not a single moment in the history of mankind when we could rigidly divide here. this is where religion ends. this is where the power politics and stuff has always been used and will be used. and what about will it? uh, religion props of some new era? i think so, because in general it’s very bad with the supporting ones, they all leave the ideologies, crumble, are brought to the turning absurdity. at first, we watched for a long time when this caricatured absurdity was brought up. uh, from the left with a tourist ideology. now liberal. right now , the main thing is not to allow the conservative ideology to be brought to the same absurdity, and even, god forbid, with the help of religion, from which it is also

possible to build such a monster, although in general. this is a very healthy approach to life, so i think that religion as a living and developing creativity of the spirit is absolutely necessary. but if someone tries to use religion as a bridle for progress, so that society develops, so to speak. this, i think, will not lead to anything good and nothing will work out the last i have a question for you, it is such an educational dimension , it’s just these cards in your hands , taking into account what we managed to say today and everything in general what is happening why and how to prepare diplomats today in the first place i believe that fundamental basis. the er approach to training diplomats is rooted in knowledge of history and the formation of empathy in relation to the structure that you are engaged in through knowledge of the languages ​​of its culture , tradition and the ability to interact with er, representative of another country, in a way

that is interesting to you , this is the fundamental basis on which the russian soviet then again the russian historical tradition has operated and i believe that we must preserve and develop it. we are currently conducting a study on how diplomats are trained in the twenty leading countries of the world. and there is absolutely paradoxical. we observed you compare how you compare your own approach with how it is done in the whole world. and there are amazing things, for example, in some of the countries do not have a textbook on the history of international relations, they don’t study foreign languages ​​somewhere, they think that it’s somewhere that you don’t need special education to enter disservice, in general, guys. having drunk on the wild service, then undergoes a one-year retraining course, in our opinion, these countries lose time in training diplomats, because it is expensive. of course, it takes 6 years to train a deep fundamental specialist in regional studies with knowledge of the language, understanding of history, and it will not necessarily work out of it

good diplomat. but at least he has a cause-and-effect connection to what 's going on in the world. they will be properly arranged, but will not be inclined to experiment with the new, which we must do in the training of a diplomat. this is to enhance their ability to interact and communicate in this new environment, where you need to take the initiative to firmly defend your own position. the actual platform to interact in the discussion. so, what would your point of view exactly your point of view looked like. as the closest approximation to common sense with this median, common sense with this. it seems to me that there are complexities in the large information space. well, i work at the school of economics. uh, we don't train diplomats. we prepare international specialists of others. yes, and andrey said the absolutely right thing, i also tell my students all the time that there should be a complete picture of the world. this is how the cause of the investigative connection, how one affects

the other, because the problem of many people and even world leaders. uh, that's what they have pictures. no, they act. here is momentarily solve tasks. and in fact, for a long time it was thought that this was normal? why is everything? right now, the world is so complicated that it is very easy to get confused, get lost and lose, in general , a compass, that this one here, especially the abundance of information, in which you absolutely do not understand. where uh, where where are the ends search and so, therefore, we need a base representation, as in general, here is a structural representation, and then already, well, everyone will be in force. to fill this structure with current events with the strength of your abilities and knowledge. but this is the whole picture from here. actually, we need a theory. why? well, they often ask, especially we have students there. well, what for, i need it, then i will go to the corporation to deal with oil. well , the fact is that oil is also taken from the same international relations that it sang

as a hint of the war, which means, in general, they have not changed much. yes, how can i recently one student not from our university hmm uh, who is also going to go somewhere to the corporation and said that 8 million people live in india, so in general, it’s clear that i think it will be difficult for him to run a successful business . thank you great, dear friends, fedorov international observers andrey shushentsov deans. faculty, there is a hero of international relations. and vladimir berry. we gathered today to think about what is happening with international relations. thank you hello, my name is dmitry bug. i'm the host of a literary podcast with a wonderful title. let them not speak, let them read. e. those who are older remember that in the late sixties the bomb was the film with the participation of the singer, rafael was sung there in spanish, and there

was the famous song deegan. loca dean is sounds like spanish. let them talk it meant that let them talk about our love. it won't hurt, it won't hurt. we are doing the main thing. here, uh, in our podcast, of course, we are talking, of course , we are talking with our guests, but all our conversations are aimed at making you read, that's what we, uh, call on our today's issue with tatyana nikitsky tolstaya writer. and maybe also a publicist, how would you define socialism yourself. hello writer. i am definitely a writer, but a publicist is not very good for me. i like this word, because e means that when you need me. seeing somewhere that i do not have all the works of art, it means that they think where to take them. well, let them beat you in the face, but i don’t consider myself a publicist, i don’t feel it, and i think, let it all be written. well, in principle, a writer is any writer. it's wide.

definition, but still essayists understand, yes, of course, it happens, there are documentaries, uh, the authors are different, well, except for prose, sometimes it's great. yes, yes, yes, except for fiction. yes, yes, yes, but you work in different states about we'll talk more about this. well, we will start with a topic that cannot be avoided in a conversation with a person who bears the surname tolstaya or tolstoy well, of course, uh, writers with this surname. we had several people in literature, but how do you feel in this role. the granddaughter of alexei nikolaevich tolstoy, whose 140th birthday has just been celebrated and, i must say, very broadly. i stay out of the congratulatory process. it's clear. i don’t like, i don’t like, in principle, i don’t like the anniversary of my own, not other people’s

birthdays, that’s all i don’t like. and so what he is remembered and read because he is an absolutely wonderful writer, very uneven. in my opinion. still, uneven, of course, uneven, because most of his e years, when he entered his talent, are thick and develop late in general, but late. and here he , too, started late and matured late. eh, it took years. e not so comfortable, but not free. yes, in this not freedom yes, in general here it is yes, it was directed in some other direction. and he had to, uh, he gladly must say, and returned imitations. in 23 e he thought that a new free beautiful life begins, yes, and that means that he took the nep for some kind of new life, uh, and all sorts of difficulties immediately began. this is where the difficulties came in. uh, and he was trying to adjust to a new life, a new

air, a new style, it was all wrong. like , uh, like before, as he used to, everything was not as we say. well, yes, before the revolution, nevertheless. this is the resistance of the material. it led to always leads to what? yes , he always had unconditional luck for something, uh, stories, but then he wrote plays. he wrote. everything, he wrote everything, yes, but not everything he liked the fact that what the destination did not work out because there is. uh, really a whole area that he discovered, for example, there are disputes between russian science fiction or soviet science fiction, but engineer gagarin's hyperbogs and the elite have different attitudes. i really love these things. they are very good, they are very good. they are alive, they are good, and uh , they understand with humor, uh, he did not like pathos. alexei tolstoy of course, wartime texts,

because wartime causes paphos and he had to leave work on peter i, which he did not write like that, and do it. that's exactly what our er interlocutor on the other side of the screen will remind us in journalism, that alexei nikolaevich tolstoy died in the forty-fifth year, without completing his main work peter i, we will say more about this, because he created the image of peter i so popular. yes, in general, yes, yes, in general, yes, he always wanted to. uh, and when they say that this is the order stalinist. no no no no he had a very early story of peter's day, of course, this era was interesting to him, she said that with the era of peter and with the personality of peter our own existence is ours. bound mouths of fat ones yes, of course, yes, capital tolstoy yes, that means pyotr andreevich tolstoy who yes, he is the common founder of our clans leo tolstoy of this branch and ours when there was a confrontation, it means that peter and sophia he

took the other side against peter and he was to be executed. well, somehow he persuaded peter not to execute. and there, apparently, some other people were also busy, and, according to legend, peter told him the head of the head, no matter how smart he was. i would have ordered you cut off and given him another job. in particular. so, he was supposed to serve as the messenger of the emulsion. uh-huh uh-huh and he had to carry out various delicate assignments, he carried them out, uh, which means that one of these delicate, uh, orders was to return tsarevich alexei from italy where he ran away and sat down tightly and began to somehow prime and accept, which means which - something, uh, well, in general plot against peter and he had his own party, which e. i also wanted to shoot peter. he was very uncomfortable to many and return. here's this very dead tsarevich and then manage him . e, tsarevich yes, and

even that, eh, it means that peter personally tortured him, and for this tsarevich alexei cursed the fat family up to the twentieth generation. hmm in front of you is a damned man, we will hope that this is not the worst. i understand. well, where does journalism have anything to do with it, but a lot of bunin and others said that alexey tolstov is the belly of the same belly inside. it was repeated very often, that is, indeed, i completely agree with this. i have my own theory. about the fact that hmm, he did not like and could not, uh, finish the work and that's it. all in all, uh, supporting this coin is a great idea. uh, wonderful or someone would say that it is related to the fear of death, for example, yes, what, the more the more difficult it is to finish, because see the viper, a beautiful thing. it starts from the end a woman comes and

says, i killed him a man. and that means then the charm of the scary backstory is told, yes, that is, they are looped in this way. by the way, like a viper rings itself, now virgins are also absolutely amazing. uh, the text is one of the best father no no. no, he has his own name. yes, yes, look at it, uh, it's practically not finished going text. that is, there is the last phrase in the fall. nikita passed the exam. moved to the second text, which falls into the line of childhood. that is, we have yours and gorky's trilogy. yes, yes, the fact that there the ending is the same as everything was cut off by the ibicus. i think generally artistically better than what he wrote. it’s written there at the end, but there is fate or there is music or someone, in general, stops my raised hand. with a pen, he says, stop everything, that is, there is no end, and peter has no end and could not be. he wrote somewhere alexei nikolaevich uh, my heroes

are getting old, that i will do inspiration with them when they are old. it’s only good when you come up with an idea, when it becomes, then it’s already more difficult to see. he did not see what would happen in the end, he wanted to pour forever great and elite finished the thing, but there is also golden key. again, the whole golden key, the whole cult area is absolutely satisfied with the ending. why because? everyone is in the theater, as readers or as a writer you condemn. that's very curious. well, in the beginning, as a reader. i took it all my life until i became a writer. hey, like a writer? i don't know what can be done here. that's what i'll tell you, but how to read, look they are, uh, everything is in the situation of the theater and there is a mysterious thing, if this is the very hearth painted on canvas. uh, the canvas closes some door, and it opens with a golden key. and here they are, finally. hooray win they open. and what is the theatre? well, yo-my, it's let's go in a circle. i didn't

think about it, but i remember how it was the anniversary of the appearance. this work and in the museum , which is located on spiridonovka street , once it was aleksey tolstov, there was a whole procession of dolls that depict the heroes of pinocchio and even people became interested. isn't it some kind of political? uh. well, this is political useful literature. yes, we demanded worship in front of literature, you say that, it means used to be alexei tolstoy, yes, and even before that, she was a spiridonovka, and of course. and yes to him means he got it. well, at the end of the thirties, he received this mansion on spiridonovka street, but why? but because , that is, no one knew about this, only the fat ones know, because spiridon, by blood or the tolstoy family, is the patron saint of messi of the fat. i think that the moscow authorities , giving alexey nikolaevich no, they did not know where. well, it's provincial in such a way. yes, yes, but please tell me how

brought out the classic. eh, they came to such a life that they began to write as a writer. is it true that these conversations or anecdotes are friendly, that it all began, as if from such a family life, and in history, writing a story is all cases, but that's all, not true. absolutely not. what is even family life, family life and home life with parents, and my property there, as they say. there will also be the granddaughter of lavinsky mikhail leonidovich and natalia krandievskaya. this this should scare away any grandchild when you have such a qualities of grandfather and grandmother, then, of course, i need somewhere with this absolutely translator dante classic e language. yes, this is your another one of your grandfather and his brother knew 22 languages ​​22 languages. paris got over your popularity belongs to my already conscious age. i

saw it all, and it was all sudden. i once stumbled upon a story myself we were in a fog. and i almost remembered his speech there by biologists who, in difficult times of perestroika, write articles in some popular encyclopedia and write a wolf wolf with animals bored will not take writes bear animal. such-and-such. no, you need something more fun, and then with him, it turns out approximately. that's what uh means uh. mm, just to amuse the dashing bad weather, as it will play out. the blizzard is instantly disturbed, the internal metabolism of utoptygin with a concomitant increase in the lipid layer. i realized that well, uh write. maybe such a very talented person. here's me for me tatiana tolstoy began with this paragraph, but it's absolutely brilliant yes, how it all began. i had eye surgery. after i've been doing this for 3 months, but i didn't see anything either. hellish eyes hurt, and i was able to. here, how dark it is around us here, here the audience,

it may not be visible, but here is the ink witch. and so i had to sit in this inky darkness, because any light cut. these eyes are cut to me and thus i got into a situation of such informational emptiness. and it's like meditation. it was a kind of meditation. i didn't read a single line. and now, when everything is gone, when all this husk itself is rotten and other unnecessary information is gone, then actually because of the salty so to speak. nicky apparently they made their way out. i began to see uh, pictures, uh and these in the form of text hear them, well, that is, you become a writer when you stop being a reader, but in your case it was like that, i don’t know the rules, no, uh, at first i didn’t really understand what it was connected with the operation, that is, here meditation after the operation, but right there soon, then back to the newspapers. i passed. eh, some person. he taught mathematics was an ordinary teacher and suddenly found himself.