calculation e-e gorky was. yes, definitely a thoughtful person, especially from a certain point. this is how he built his life. he was a politician. e is not always successful, the politician would say. here, uh, by the way, about the fact that the destroyer , i would not say that gorky was a destroyer even during his revolutionary hobbies. here, what is he doing? as a matter of fact, when he lives on a drop, he tries to reconcile laziness and opposition, which has been inside for centuries. in general, he always tried reconcile everyone. actually gorky here is his peacekeeping mission. for some reason , it is less noticeable than the fact that he was a revolutionary there. he tried to reconcile stalin's opposition there. he tried to try on writing or different directions. well, sometimes they say. yes, to behave from tough even cruel sometimes you know, i had such

a conversation, a very short very good writer. all right, well, they mostly said or well, she asked, she knew gorky , she was personally acquainted with him, she asked what gorky was like, she thought, well, she was different, he really was different. dear friends, this is the podcast the life of the wonderful is with you alexey varlamov, a writer and rector of a literary institute. we continue our conversation with pavel basinsky about alexei maksimovich gorky, is it true or not? they told me such a legend that when gumilyov was being led to the execution, a man appeared who, at gorky's request , tried to save him and turned to a group of people who were standing there. and who is the poet here, gumilyov, to which gumilyov said not here? and this is gumilyov, there is officer gumilyov, and gumilyov was shot, but gorky tried to

save him. is it true or not? well, about the fact that some person , right during the execution in gum , experience tried to save him. i do not know, but what is bitter, and went from st. petersburg to moscow to lenin, including, uh, to save gomilev. this is true, and there is a version that e heat, in which he was chairman of the st. petersburg council and was at that time in con. with bitter precisely because he was the chief commander of petrograd. gorky visited gorky in petrograd. they hid from the singed in the apartment. bolsheviks even, by the way, speaking to the members of the royal family, people in his apartment in kronverk, but zinovir did not like this, and in gorky's apartment they even staged an obaska once. and that they even hurried up with the execution of gumilyov precisely because gorky went to save him, but this is again such a rather shaky version. but the fact that he was trying to save gumilyov is true,

that he was trying to ensure that the block was released abroad for treatment is true, and he is generally hmm like how very wittily wrote viktor shklovsky, what does it mean during the civil war we ate a very large writer. he spoke in gorky, because he really is in many ways. this is a publishing house, world literature, which was created where the same block as translators were involved. e of all the masterpieces, which means world literature, it was completely clear that those plans that the bitter offered were simply unrealizable in the conditions of the civil war. but it gave them a ration. it gave them a home. it gave them firewood, there and so on and so forth. he just saved them from death and saved, indeed, very many. well, it's a well-known story. it is really real that he transferred money through gisson

to rozanov at sergiev posad, because how much they helped him. i don't know, but probably something could, of course. and it was really he who was trouble-free in this regard, when they turned to him, he did everything he could, and at that moment, in the conditions of this civil war, the famine was really in petrograd, and all this just went to him, of course. well, after all, he was in the civil war, was he for red or not? and somewhere at she has something, in general, not the right reds and whites he was not not for the reds, what do you mean for the reds? uh, who are the red ones? well , it seems to me that at that time there was enough army, which was led by trotsky. and that's for sure he wasn't scoring them. well, but i don't think he cared at all. this moment. there gorky was concerned about culture. yeah, he saved

the intelligentsia. he saved artifacts, just cultures, he tried to save the old cultural institutions. and there i don’t know, the publishing house, sytin, yeah, uh, put him in jail. just some the moment was destroyed there, and then this is also an important moment, he leaves soviet russia . how and why, well, strictly speaking, it was not migration, because he still had a soviet passport, and he was undergoing treatment. he really was very ill at that time , hemoptysis began. it wasn't a case. how often it is written that gorky was very popular and did not live for so long. but there were problems with the lungs, especially since he shot himself in the lungs for 18 years, when he tried to commit suicide in kazan and, in general, he had to be treated. you just needed yourself save. well lenin insisted on this

famous letter. if you don’t leave, then we’ll send such a joke to lenin, which means that he leaves first for a european sanatorium, but he rushes to italy of his beloved italy to the south of italy for drops, but in italy there is already a musolin, therefore , difficulties arise there, they let him in, but for drops, or is he he himself did not want to go, because he already had such a resort, most likely, they were not allowed to go. uh, it is known that the musalini there, in my opinion, already gave all the countries of the country, he absolutely did not need gorky, and most importantly - they remembered what happened on capra, and 900 hours to 13 years. it even went just workers who emigrated. uh, after the defeat of the first russian revolution, they also settled in drops. there were terrorists, there were romantics, but there were murderers , terrorists and bandits. yes, and everyone came there too. he lived there, socialist-revolutionary rotenberg, the killer of gapon, lived there, he came there.

dzerzhinsky lenin on the other hand. chaliapin bunin leonid andreev, that is, there was such a very stormy life there, which is not very good for, uh, a small capricious community either was. that's why he lives in saren. yes, yes, also the neapolitan coast. and what is he doing there? there he writes. eh, the affairs of the riot police are there. there he writes in life with a climas, he begins to write, and his relationship develops. on the one hand, with russian migration, on the other hand , with soviet relations operations. he doesn't fit well. generally. you need to understand that inside the migration, there were no good relations at all, no one had writers at all. doesn't love the other. and when they find themselves in such very difficult situations, i would say very strongly. competitive circumstances, including for receiving the nobel prize there. begins to love each other especially strongly in quotation marks. here, as for gorky well, first of all, he

was the most famous writer at that time, well, of course, yes, because he was translated a lot abroad, translated a lot, but there was another very important moment. and he certainly begins financial difficulties. still, it's vital, mmm, enough in italy, dear. uh, gorky's hospitable house different people live there. there lives and buddhas there the berbers also live. yes, vladislav and his niece. there, valentina, soviet writers come there, by the way, one by one they are released there for what , in order to bring gorky back there, they come and tell how in the soviet union now it’s become good for you to write, and they really become good in many ways, but still, when solzhenitsyn wrote that it was financial difficulties that were the main reason for his return to sovietsky, one of the reasons. yes one of the reasons. yes, because after all, he, uh, had to keep

keep a big enough house. here, uh, the bride's family. timosha loved to dress very beautifully son. maxim was a passionate motorist and so on and so forth. and this is what he was given here unconditionally. uh, it was published. hmm, i don't remember. in what year, uh, the expenses for the gorky family are something like a million something, that's a lot of money. well, not only that would be the main reason. he, of course, has long been a mobile award. it really was waiting, of course, of course, he was waiting, he was somehow interested in belevsky, premium or conditionally. he should have been given it to the nobel, and because he was connected with the communists , the communists executed the royal family, the royal family was related to the family of the swedish king. the swedish king should hand over the award to the nobel laureate, and this

moment, in general, he is purely political, he prevented him from giving it. she, of course, of course, we wouldn’t give him, but in the soviet union, how they treated him, and in the soviet union, when he returns for the first time, he comes in the twenty- eighth year. uh, this is his anniversary, that is, the eighth year of birth, and there is a photograph - it's huge. just not even a crowd of people from the sea of ​​belarus belorussky railway station. although when i was preparing my book of the rod series, and we hmm gorky museum here is the grebushinsky mansion we selected photographs. and then such an old one, which means that she is a worker. i mean, you see how he was received. she gave me such a naronic look. she says, well, you understand, it's just a curiosity, but nonetheless. this is a philosopher, they meet him in

their arms, by the way, 11 years old, bukharin. uh, who will then be shot, including for allegedly how to prepare for the murder of gorky. here he is met. yes, they welcome him, but it was organized in many ways. here he is touring the country. here he sees this socialism under construction and what does he feel? yes, alexey well , objectively speaking, repressions, yes, which in fact, there really are more than the thirties there. there are camps and so on. it's all behind the facade, and life in cities. uh, in leningrad in moscow, she was much richer than life in europe; here was a book by sergei belyakov about george fron, the son of marina svyataya, he describes in great detail how in general, the intelligentsia lived there. moscow life in the late thirties. this is a slightly

different story. it seems to me, yes, and in the late twenties already. in general, life is definitely getting better. there is a letter that is bukharin. uh, writing to gorky very curious about the meeting of the central committee, uh, but i apologize for this rude word. they write to aleksey maksimovich yes , when you return from this europe, that you will live with these beef men in general, you look, everything is fine here. your favorite leningrad in general blooms and smells, and so on and uh, she certainly established life in the cities. by at least one can imagine that gorky is quite sincerely enthusiastic and puts gorky on the table, as you know. three monkeys stood like that. this is such an indian character, one closes its eyes, another mouth, third ears and see nothing. nothing is heard. i won't tell anyone. gorky , of course, understood more than what he said at that time, especially in journalism in general. that thirties is monstrous. here, true, it is

monstrous, it is monstrous not even in content, because he praises stalin there, who did not praise him. the guys who didn’t praise stalin, except for mandelstam, who, because of this, paid very seriously, it’s not even that he praises stalin through a word , she’s monstrous in her bedding. and how to explain it? i don't know, i don't understand. this is really a riddle that a person simultaneously writes in life. gena is writing, uh, a brilliant play, yegor bulychev and others are writing. this is absolutely furious journalism to strangle these enemies of the people to kill these enemies. on rollbee in general, how sincere is he here? i don't even understand to be honest so i think that we still do not know well enough and have studied stupid, what is generally hmm it seems to me that

gorky's journalism of that time. you just have to put down the newspaper to watch. in what sequence were these articles published, and for what purpose did he pursue what goals , because at the same time he helps a huge number of people, that is, he continues to do what you do before, of course, but at the same time, it means journalism. i say, okay , enough of stalin, but he simply calls that killing means executing all these traitors traitors of the enemies of the people, and even in creativity. this is where it gets in. unfortunately, because he writes such write reaches others. e, where does it appear, yes, he is such a kvdeshnik who will arrest everyone in the house of yegor bulychev, because in the nest of enemies of the people, well , fortunately, this is his only work of art in which he really changes. here even i, when faced with bitterness, when i wrote my other books, here is bulgakov

yes at the end of the twenties. he still helps bulgakov. tries to help with the play run, for example, in the mid-thirties, when bulgakov wrote molière. gorky actually hacked this book to death by andrey platon at the end of the twenties. he helps him publish chavengur, that is, he tries to help , nothing happened, but at least he appreciates this injury in the early thirties , the story garbage wind, a brilliant platonic story, gorky just hacked everything and plato blocked his oxygen there. this is all the same, what, what was in it, how to understand this by the end of life. he somehow cursed , i don’t know, he frowned, what happened to him is some kind of mystery in the behavior of even a trip to yes. by the way, here, uh, who is charged there , they change me, but the story with the boy. it's true, right? no, of course not, just like all those upside-down newspapers, there and so forth. no, of course, well, it’s clear what they brought there, it’s clear there, but the fact is that at the end of the twenties, the solovki are a little bit different from

the slavs who become the thirties there. magazines are published there. it has its own theater there , some kind of newspapers there. uh, there's some cultural life going on there. there, she quite interesting in fact, because people of very different classes of ideological moods get there, all boiled in one boiler. so, why did gorky go there? wanted to see shops or wanted to see. ah, corrective. yes, yes, camps, because this is the idea of ​​​​reforging, yes, he really was infected with the amur canal, that's what labor will re-educate. i think it was such an old netshanstvo, there is no chance in it, but in what respect of culture, the highest hmm is more important than a person, the culture of civilization, civilization more important than a person, pyramids, pyramids, not

a person, the egyptian pyramids cannot be built uh, without not uh using a slave corpse. well, wait, you can't build petersburg without burying a huge amount of pyramids in these swamps. sounds bitter uh, proudly not petersburg sounds like a mountain man. he says the channel is an important civilizational, as he believed, so to speak, by building to connect. from the baltic black sea, he wrote about these untimely thoughts, by the way, he writes about the fact that temporary thoughts he starts writing before october. so after february he starts writing and he protests against, and sending people to the front of the first world war, and writes there a curious phrase instead of sending these people to be slaughtered, wouldn’t it be better to send them to the construction, as he writes the case of the baltic kherson canal, oh which

peter the great dreamed of. but this is such a hot ideology, uh, but which, in the first place, many were infected. and secondly, well, let's not be cunning, and the implementation of fast tamps is not done differently, so here. uh, you can say as much as you want that it is monstrous and so on. ka- what other options, and other options not to make a revolution, yes, go back again. what else is there to do? then? let's go back to the sixty-first year and still correctly free the peasant, not the way they freed without land, gorky and stalin is it correct to assume that stalin understood everything about gorky, but was dissatisfied. hmm gorky disappointed him because he didn't write anything about him. and stalin, in general, where to lure gorky for this. he also started write, as if this book began to receive some, but there is even the beginning of his book of the rest, where he begins to write about

georgia what is georgia this book wrote for americans, there even at the beginning of e he writes that georgia should be confused with the american with the state. george why all of a sudden when? what does it matter to the soviet reader since jones this book assumed that she would be translated this book. uh, gorky's task was to introduce stalin to us to work in the arena. how so why didn't it work? well no it turned out e didn’t write one version, that she couldn’t write another version , that they didn’t like what she wrote, wrote a border to say, but here’s an interesting moment with stalin, because in principle , she’s correspondence, as it were, published on this the correspondence shows that this was a business collaboration. stalin needed gorky to give weight to just uh the ussr for world

public opinion, because gorky was an extremely respected writer. there among there roman roland stephansey there thomasman, there and so on and so on. and hmm stalin was needed by the bitter so that he could do everything you want to rent journals open institutes to help scientists. this moment is less studied, that he helped the writer there. here it is, he helped academic science a lot. he created a literary institute and gave us an estate on tverskoy boulevard. for this, you can forgive him all the sins , the most important and most mysterious, in gorky's life, his death from your point of view. was it murder or not? well, from my point of view, there was no murder. although some the leading even, er, gorkovologists spiridon adhered to. yes, such a point of view, what is murder? i find this unlikely.

eh, just for the reason that gorky was surrounded by a very large number of doctors and it was impossible to kill gorky so that others would not notice this, moreover, it was created by an academician in an hour completely independent, as if an expert who studied all the materials. they are still recorded. there, they studied all the materials related to the bitter disease. the unconditional verdict was that he was dead. still from the disease of his death. no one poisoned him there, and the vaccine from paris recently documents that allegedly sent a vaccine from paris to help the bitter, but in fact it was a vaccine, food is the presumption of innocence evidence, there is no bitter. there are only assumptions besides the meaning of uh. well, what if he he would say something, well , immediately after gorky's death there is a moment. uh, there is a moment, for example, the strange trip of aragon, who rode gorky, went through leningrad, that means with this one with elsa. this is realiz

his wife, the clile from the beginning stopped by , gorky arrived, he died already, right? and what would he say, it's bad. i'm talking about the fact that it was after gorky's death that the rampart began. here are these political reps at any moment. uh, she was tired of the tooth, but gorky's main thing was not that she had not written a book about him there and that gorky tried to sit on two chairs against gorky. let's also be frank. the opposition against stalin was it was the lenin guard, inside, which against stalin there was a specific opposition in the person of bukharin and so further. so, uh, stalin strangled this opposition. and this is all terrible, of course, but it was a political sickness in which gorky began to take part. here, he again tried to be people's supporters and in fact,

of course, he began to work for the opposition, because they were closer to him, they understood each other better. and, of course, they didn't like it. yes, mystery moment. this three times these nightly visits began over the sick gorky, the doctors began, they did not let him in, because gorky was simply in a very bad condition there was a sister chirkova was, but sorry. in general, the last women, as it were, also says, here, and which are directly. he didn't care, but he couldn't have been killed without her noticing. well, in general, it remains such a constant question. i think not. he was really very seriously ill bitter. and in general, he had composed. thank you. paul for this wonderful conversation. it was a podcast life of wonderful. we talked about alexei maksimovich gorky and whose birthday is celebrated on march 28 and in this studio was pavel basinsky a wonderful

writer, prose writer, winner of numerous literary awards, and i alexei varlamov , writer and rector of the literary institute. hi all. my name is tatyana gevorkyan, this is a podcast of a stupid shit and today we will talk about fashion as an industry and as a social phenomenon. my guest today is a journalist, blogger and a person who is truly passionate about fashion arina kholina designer svetlana rodina hello girls hello, joke, girls. hi can i just say. hi girls, let's start right from the beginning, how trends are formed, who invents them, who dictates them, or borrows them or borrows them already from some 20 years ago about color trends.

there is such an ingenious classical story, the tenth is 60. well, in principle, europe is just in the post-war crisis and cognac, in which we know cognac, of course, the drink and they say, we armenians called, then they suddenly asked for a dramatic drop in sales. well, it’s almost despair, and someone from well, from some final company there had some kind of connection with the factory fabrics and the person who comes up with such a story persuades this fabric manufacturer. well, in principle, the fashion industry is also not on the rise at that moment, yes, the entire economy in europe is destroyed. so in general, he didn’t care that the gray fabric, that the fabric is your strong point. they, in principle, took some more or less their own brown fabric. they called this color like cognac accordingly, they persuaded some diors there conditionally, yes, to introduce this color and cognac just happened.

no, well, first of all, it was very fashionable to be in cognac color, that is, brown clothes, and some incredible growth turned out. simply phenomenal, they raised themselves again to super heights. well, uh, again, when it appears now, there is the color of champagne, yes , an observation according to this scheme, because indeed in russian we have a designation of colors. they are what they are, and in english they have a color. cognac, they have color, camel well done. they have champagne. we are very camels not russian yet had these magazines. they don't use it once a month. uh, like, oh, this week's trend again surprise the color of champagne went to the flowers of champagne, for example, today we looked at you have the color of a champagne flower. and you typical cocoa, yes, more champagne. this is where

the designer would probably call it. what is the name of intelligence? yes, i have. well , some of it is more crucian, like an ocher pigment, but i know a little about what i wanted to add, which, for example, is amazing in russia. there are crafts and lace. yes, and embroidery and this russian craft, i want to say that, for example, when we presented in japan the first collection, then japan for example, yes, beans there they had such a beautiful woman to how they adore the traditions of our own. why are we taking so long? it was this post-soviet time that they denied that, no-no-no, we are not russian. this is russian speech. heard abroad. we are all encrypted. we are all under them. this is disgusting, because in fact we have amazing roots, we have incredible traditions in russia, and actually the idea is just that it should be taken from there, but that experience. truly global, because well, what it’s a sin to hide in france, uh, fashion was in italy, it was and there really is amazing fashion in america, but we, for example, now

there are those people who say no, we are in fashion, in general, now we are on our own. we ourselves are such cool fellows that it is also wrong that they have a lot that can be adopted by adapting for us, see now there has been such a trend. you all remember, we all remember plus or minus everything, the end of the nineties yes , the beginning of the 2000s, the trend for sexuality , feminine silhouettes, things that, for sure, you, too, once find in your wardrobe, old ones. they seem to be two sizes too small. and now the fashion for oversize oversize is convenience. this will be positive, does this mean that women began to dress for themselves, and not for men, that is, now they are trying less to emphasize sexuality. you know, it seems to me that just now, firstly, everything has returned some kind of corsets. you know, the other slip, that's what you said, it's not only we got fat on the subject of time. yes, well, yes, indeed already

you start wearing some larger one, even a t-shirt, and then you don’t understand how it sticks so-so in the armpit, but a little different. the main material is different. he has almost all the material now about the meeting. it is more comfortable breathable and the technology of the material itself, if they are semi-synthetic there, uh, they are very comfortable in a different way than those clothes of the nineties for example. and listen, well, firstly, since the nineties there was already a canon there, then celine came. uh, was the japanese kabakuba some kind of garzon, this is generally a separate system. it's like history, how the belgians were also belgians, again, right? well, listen, it’s still a lot, so it’s not really something wild, directly niche, when it was called smart fashion yes, now it’s, well, it’s like we’re throwing it in a different way, but, firstly, universal depends on the fabric . if only she was such a hoodie for me. some kind of translucent from some kind of veil, i don’t know felt wool, it would fit in a different way and would show

sexuality to the body, in general, this is not about over or slim here, uh, here i will hold you for sure, yes, with us just not now. here the men are not takes part in our conversation. i think they are about oversizing as spain wants. what can i say on the contrary, well, even posting. yes, if you take, then, for example, the larger the over thing. for example, a woman looks more feminine in it. really, for example, a woman, look no-no, there is a cool thin fat. it's all in the head, secret well, what are we here already, all this is only tall and thin. and this is only high, it can be such that it turns out that if trends are dictated by designers, then let's say. i really love aries it's of course after all, they also suddenly realized for there, let's say during the pandemic, what about, but how convenient it is to walk, let's go. hidrim this trend and we'll just wear it all. i think that, most likely, of course, also a social manifestation. everyone was sitting at home. remember at

some point, surely you know there was a surge, after everyone went out, everyone went in sweatpants. eh, in such home. it's so convenient and everyone really understood that you can, like, not meet. every day. you can spend there, like on zoom, everyone began to appreciate the time communication, there is something else yes, and things , including, i think that everyone is tired of this and there are feathers and food. you understand, yes, how it works too, like at some point , like after the pandemic, for example, the color of pontoon was the main one, it's golden with bright red in such, you know, uh. e sequin combination sequin quantity and you know how it is, for example. uh, trend bureau. e, for example, described how the explosion of lava was like an avalanche. so people came out, like, you know, now the conclusion of the feeling was that really everything is great. bright super shiny, yes, that is, it was really. a holiday like this, when you know everything, the same confinement came out over well , look how great it looks. take the same one there gigi hadis was,

yes, and thin waists, low rises are super, overjeans are some huge dicks, and i think it's super. er, well, it's a reflection of all the social phenomena of federal political phenomena. yes world. well, as far as i remember, here. uh, very cool to the whole world with promoted then still a vetman, uh, vassal. she came out in this kind of down jacket. here a down jacket went somewhere in the back. well, its somehow a cut. there, of course, some kind of bra stuck out, what is it? she looked unbelievably hot in it, so look who we're dressing for and that's sexy. listen well, i now believe that when people make a big mistake for me. they say that i'm out of fashion even if a person runs back to the darkest corner, and they really try to create there, perhaps it's just a personal personal uniqueness style. we live, in general, a space not may not reach. but even if you come to the store and, for example, there will be jeans, there will still be up to 20 styles, but they

will all be in trend. well, or teach, yes, but still you will evoke it further. here , let's say the nineties then there was still a topic, especially in russia that all women are conditionally speaking, there, at the age of 20, in principle, it doesn’t matter for the rich rich man. well, the task is to get married. she, at least, shimmered. and when you, like, well, wait no, when you're from twenty to twenty-five, that's right you feel it is your duty to get married. well, preferably not quite for a stray and a loafer. yes, i'll surprise you , nothing has changed, so it's very hard to argue that everything has changed. so, in short, naturally, if you have a super-task, you try to achieve it as much as possible by everyone at once. ways. what are the uh trends that have emerged over the past year? well, over you yourself said over a long time ago. well, you know, he

was either more or less each corsets. no no i don't mean, you know right, that's all the same shirts corsets. well, like, when it's just sewn under a corset, well, that is, a silhouette and pseudo. well, right. so let's say. yes, so to speak. yes, my personal pain is that gone, uh, low-waisted jeans are back. this is a low waist, which is now with some kind of low waist. i have always loved, just to expose animals, between you like this, just like it was right in the 2000s. yeah, i believe me, i went to college. i had jeans with a low waist and winter 20 and a short jacket. i walked here with a bare stomach at -20 as a child. everything is different in youth it was now nothing returns in the form of a dictatorship. now mom is returning again, i don’t know where they went, but conditionally. yes, then, to the fact that there mom is again happy about the break of this. yes, people are already tired of chasing trends. and in general, many

designers rely on basic wardrobe, so fashion as a phenomenon representing new trends every season. it’s already somehow a little outdated, doesn’t it seem to you that fashion, as a phenomenon, on the contrary, is even more relevant, because motov, in principle, is like that, but something, if we take the fash industry, as a reflection of social reality and a designer who analyzes like analysts. yes, fashion trends a year ahead, because a collection for buyers enters the fashion market for the first time, that is, yes, for experiments further for a month already with retail in another six months it is put up on the market, now designers are really working on a collection, and the next there are already summers people for whom clothing is utilitarian, in principle, there is nothing wrong with this series, i don’t know there, i bought jeans and made some kind of sweatshirt to keep warm. and some part there are people which we are not about fashion we have our own unique style. this is not necessarily some kind of bohemian creative profession you have.

here, the girl tava was a superstar of the 2000s, who generally lived in some kind of deaf , but an american village, and she picked up some kind of junk in the local second-hand store, and it was so stylized that after literally 2 years she was already invited to shows. anna, editor-in-chief of the american volga, that is, there is such power, such power, and people are in the middle. that is, i can’t be beaten with this at all in my youth these, on the contrary, are delusional and they create their own. and there are people who want to look somehow strong in terms of such and such a time. yes, they have some time for such and such a season, but if they are ready to pay, she has the certainty to pay attention, to somehow force herself to shop there. there read stylists that combines some color. well, at the same time, they don’t have such an obsession and they need fashion, because it’s logical, it’s understandable, it’s easier for them to navigate specific trends. and here's the fashion she's never will not go away, this is a concept, because

i bet this. well, of course, i would now think that there are a lot of such a number of people and they need fashion. the lord sings on earth, glory

to god my heart my heart

lord my lord, holy and the lord is stronger

, glory to god jesus