get scratch cards and catch discounts every day gildiclofenac magnet in a package with a man contains a maximum concentration of 5% of the active substance. 5% gel. diclofenac akos quality alternative patriotic own choose a car. it’s hard, whoever fits the car doesn’t fit the price , then it fits, the price doesn’t fit the car, and when you find the perfect car with the perfect price, the account goes for seconds to issue a tinkoff car loan for both a new and a used tinkoff car, he is the only one. it's okay, i've never had so much, but i wake up earlier than before to rise above myself and the circumstances were the word did not launch sms in the subway and rose above all

so that you communicate not only with words, but also with pictures. and if you need the word go to megafon again, you will say, when you see a juicy summer sale on yandex.market , buy a tv for only 8,990 rubles, who set up roger the tiger cub and edgard zapashny on my social networks, so much filth poured from the ukrainian side boy dog ​​water like a flood in serbia got into ukrainian fakes, indeed, emotionally , the heart breaks when a person is in emotions, he does not think he can upload everything, as well as a meeting.

after 9 years, a woman from artyomovsk, rescued by russian soldiers, found her sister in russia tomorrow on the first broadcast big game, we have already begun to talk about china and today the chairman of the chinese people of the republic , sit pinyu, turned 70 years old, vladimir putin, of course, sent him a congratulatory telegram in which noted the invaluable contribution of the leader of china to the strengthening of relations comprehensive partnership and strategic interaction between, uh, our countries, and at the end of this week should finally take place many times, frustrated. well, at least one time was definitely thwarted. visit of the secretary of state, blinkin. to the people's republic of china, let me remind you that biden and the cdp agreed on this visit at

the g20 summit in bali, but then there was an incident with a chinese balloon that caused a monstrous hysteria inside the united states, the visit was disrupted. they also tried to disrupt this visit frustrate someone clearly inside the american deep state because once it became known. the fact that blinken is going to china immediately appeared in the american media that china allegedly created and even strengthens, and the base in cuba for spying on electronic intelligence for e, the united states, but the biden administration managed to somehow hush it up, and this topic and visit. well, most likely it will. let's see on sunday monday , blinkin's negotiations in beijing with the tsingans should go through, and minister of foreign affairs. china may even accept it. uh, sitting down and really, this will be an important event for us-china relations, because let me remind you that the last time the american

secretary of state came to beijing was 5 years ago, and this state registrar was also mike pompeo, and the goals and objectives of the visit, the expectations from the visit are not very high . biden administration. here are, very emphatically modest tasks, but it simply formulates without any breakthroughs to prevent further escalation of the confrontation for example, listen to how the goals of the visits formulates the lock of the secretary, uh, who is in charge of the asia-pacific direction daniel crit, damn it. this is not a visit that i would expect many results from. i think this is a really important series of meetings that we're going to have in beijing at a crucial moment in the relationship, and again we hope that this will at least reduce the risk of miscalculation so that we don't slide into a potential conflict. we are not going to beijing with the intention of making some kind of breakthrough or transformation in the way we treat each other. well, that is, obviously stabilization confrontation is not to improve relations

of not achieving anything, but to prevent even greater degradation of us-china relations. and here is how the purpose of the visit is formulated by the press secretary of the white house, karin jar. the main objectives of the visit are, firstly, to establish communication channels that will help control the rivalry so that it does not turn into a conflict. also keep these channels of communication open, secondly, speaking up for american values ​​is what presidents stand for, what is the subject of his interest and the last third. we believe it is in our interest to explore potential collaborations and transnational challenges. well, the republicans are in congress. naturally, they are no longer guessing, but the chairman of the committee on combating china and the chinese communist party in the house of representatives may galahir one of the main such anti-chinese hawks even today published an article in wall street jordal, in

which he called the biden administration's policy towards china zombie strategies then is already dead, but moving. yes, it's clear that politics, let's say cooperation with china with china does not work, according to the galkira, only problems and failures for the united states, but still the biden administration, how this dead zombie is moving towards cooperation with china , yes. that is, here is what we actually call the systemic confrontation from the point of view. galkira is about cooperation and further involvement. china, vladimir sergeevich , i get the impression that, and this visit is needed more by the united states than china do you agree with this and if so why the united states? this is blinkin's visit, despite the inward political criticism that exists. that 's what is heard from the house of representatives. i think that if we can agree, because this, in fact, was sought by the american side even after its abolition in

february, the american side also pedaled it under conditions when it was constantly in the american press. this should be a well- awakened or barrage theme. possible war between china and the united states america, to me personally it seems that today here is the administration, as it were, that it introduced its time, controlled or managed. eh, the competition or confrontation is so controlled and controlled that it didn’t go beyond some limits and didn’t lead to an aggravation. here is the situation of its transfer to the military phase. maybe today , because since this happened throughout the spring , the impression was created that america 's relations with china at some point in time could get out of control, which is not in beijing there is no understanding of what the united states of america wants, but the united states of america did not really want to bring its

goals and tasks to beijing. it seems to me personally that today the main task is to reassure this part of the american public that the situation is here. under control here, if in ukraine it is not completely under control, then as far as the pacific region is concerned, it is under control here. well, still very important, nevertheless. i personally still think this is a related issue. uh, with uh chinese base in cuba to me personally it seems that china has found an unkilled card. this is a response to taiwan because the americans thought for too long that everything would happen there in this area, and suddenly it turned out that china had a fairly clear and symmetrical answer, but what happened in the sixty-two and subsequent years is all well, it is known and the americans are very quickly saw that the united states that china is occupying all the time. here is the role that the soviet union played all the time and this is the scenario. it's

played. most importantly, this is a scenario with games, moreover, china comes to this region with a much stronger economic position than even the soviet union had in the sixties. next year, in principle, in principle, china can take over cuba . and this is the biggest headache that washington has today and everyone is very afraid of it. and this fact, perhaps, finally prompted the americans that, yes, they should go to beijing, because this is the case, uh, china has found. i found a very interesting countergame. that's when the united states talks about china's controlled confrontation. i have deja vu because the same thing they said about russia in 2021, while refusing to respect russian interests and red or not? that is, they also told us, let's stabilize the confrontation. let's find the bottom below, which we will not, but sink, but at the same time, ukraine is pumping weapons into nato and so on and so on and so on. what did it

lead to? we all remember that now the united states is also talking about stabilizing the confrontation with respect to china, but with this is the continuation of the supply of arms to taiwan , we are laying around china with bases, so to speak, from all sides, except for the continent, where, thank god, russia and the sco, and not uh, the united states , and that is, they talk about stabilizing the confrontation without changing the policy that leads to this confrontation and leads aleksandrovich here, but will the very nature of us-chinese relations change, in your opinion, as a result of this visit, but it is actually a different nature. and if you remember, this is the confrontation and china uh, guji, the teacher of sun tzu, uh, in the middle of the first three, he wrote about the confrontation consent confrontation consent and why did he go there and why did america pass a law for 800

billion dollars on the development of electric vehicles in order to pull the auto industry out of europe, and without chinese batteries spare parts will not work, and this whole program for 800 billion just flies into the trash. and what about iphones. and what to do with the fact that china's e - this is half of e, the market electronics of computer equipment and so on and profit there gets american companies and allies of americans and so on, how to break it? eh, that's how easy it is to take and give. uh, china, or just lose a trillion dollars in profits, after all, apparently, those who really stand for the depth of the states ahead, negotiate, because we are not ready now, that's all. us all these concerns are european. and now you're going to ruin everything for us, we agreed ahead. well, let's get back to that not war, of course, but really

the big e war that is going on in europe , the ukrainian e, the conflict and and today rammstein e is taking place, where military assistance to ukraine is being discussed and, e, quite interesting statements have already been made. here is jens stoltenberg secretary general. nato announced that the training of ukrainian pilots on the f-16 has already begun. this is a very interesting statement, because just the day before , the minister of defense of the netherlands kaisa ollangan stated that the training of ukrainian pilots on the f-16 has not yet begun and our ambition, as she said, and that this summer, moreover, in denmark a and and they say that, uh, first of all, they will be trained in denmark, so here are the official representatives. yes, they say that in august the training of ukrainian pilots will only begin. no pillar. he says that already now, and about the clarity until the very transfer of the planes no today, both stoltenberg and mark miles, and the head of the joint

chiefs of staff of the united states said that, well, sometime, when the cancer dangles on the mountain. eh, maybe even after the end of the military conflict. uh, the fighters will definitely not be handed over right now, but here is kirill gench. how are you? explain, here it is absolutely. uh, conflicting statements about training not training, but they can't help but know ian stoneberg as a political appointment. naturally, he always strives to put or ahead of the horse. how many times has he stated that there is a consensus in nato on the admission of ukraine from what, when they entered the ears for other countries, they said what kind of consensus we are against , so stoltenberg pushed through the political line. it's the same with pilot training. uh, stolpli eh, he pushes through, he says yes. it's all started already gone. it seems that it is really important for him to report, including to the most important american shareholder , that everything is in order, that things are going well. and do not look here, what do we have

here under the table or what? we have here in what boxes stuffed. that is, in this regard. er, the purpose of what such statements do is that in the first place both the netherlands and denmark find out what they are already teaching. that is, they explained the general line. what is the right way to speak now? well, they will try something really do this. plus one more addressee - it's understandable that russia is intimidating that ukraine will now receive that very wunderwaffe, that very miraculous weapon that will definitely change everything and in this regard, you don't think that ukraine today's countermeasures have failed even now she will be abandoned. no vice versa. uh, that's it, let's double the stakes, let's open the stakes so that no one, in general, thinks that ukraine can be abandoned. that is, we are the addressee, so you can also understand this clearly. will these rates be real and how much reality will pull up the statement will be? slower not on that scale nor in this way and it is clear that in

the first place, saves his own reputation to him somewhere else. he hopes to become the head of the national bank. that is, you cannot provide any decent pension. this requires good. for this , it is necessary, including a good reputation . loud statements made at a scientific moment, when, in general, you need to click your heels to say that everything is in order. and if there is a problem, then this is not it, this is not our part. it's someone already there. well, russia many times. e said that the provision of f-16s is a serious escalation of the military conflict, because, and they will be able to strike deep into russian territory, because ukraine does not have the appropriate infrastructure. and they will most likely use the nato infrastructure, and this is already direct, not indirect, as you wrote, but direct, but nato’s participation in the conflict against russia, and now, and the risks of escalation in the last time. very often and correctly. it seems to me that he writes a former high-ranking cia official and now the director of the

us grand strategy program at the quincy institute. george beebe here. listen to what he wrote in the adaptations edition. as american aid shifted from anti-tank supplies to m-1a1 abrams tanks and from man-portable earth- to-air missiles to the biden administration patriot air defense battery. i became more and more convinced that the borders of the red lines that the kremlin set in ukraine are rather blurry and not as tough as previously assumed, despite the threatening rhetoric, russia did not show any desire for a direct confrontation with nato of biden's actions. we stopped more and more boldly. and he ended up revisiting his past decision not to supply ukraine with f-16 fighters to many observers, such a step-by-step approach to testing the limits of russian tolerance. seems discreet enough, but it has a hidden fatal flaw. the red lines of a nation, those for the sake of protection, which it will go to war, are not always static. we probably we find that we have gone too far only after we are in direct

confrontation. with russia, not before. now, uh, you are the author of the minefield metaphor that the united states is no longer the russian red lines flowing down, but has already crossed and is in a minefield, and could explode at any moment. here, in fact, george beebe, uh , writes about the same thing that you agree. yes, i agree with this that the realization will gradually come there that where we have gone, this is not a red line. uh, moved away, and we crossed them and how would we now run back behind those red lines run back. eh, it might not work. here's what we're seeing right now during the counter attack. yes, they go there on vehicles, then they run back. eh, who manages without e, without technology, that's why i come to such awareness. and in general, we have repeatedly said that in the ascertaining part, many american publications are so

adequate enough, too. yes, what are we doing. and what do we do questions sometimes ask a very correct other thing, that when it starts to answer. starts again come up with some options here. i want to return to the fact that you, it seems to me, very accurately said that there are two questions, who is to blame and what to do? although these are considered our eternal questions, but now in connection with the current stage. that's what the kiev regime is doing. they got into it too. it seems to me that these are universal questions for those who are losing now the united states asks themselves from each other, of course, in order to move on to some next stage , it does not matter to the stage that mitchell suggests an escalation or stage. here is this tagamutins of the frozen conflict, which e. chara suggests that it is necessary to appoint someone not to blame, or it must be said that everything worked out for russia. and we failed , and therefore we are moving on to a new stage, but

they also cannot say, they definitely need to be told that russia is doing everything badly, then someone is definitely to blame. here they are already shouting to zelensky that i am not to blame, but please don’t write me off yet. here the tinned one is gone, it seems that publications have gone. what can we write it off, especially in connection with the northern streams, therefore, now there is a struggle. i think in the coming week around the one who is to blame, from whom everything is attributed to biden, of course, they will write off, but something more substantial will be attributed to him next year. and well, and then, maybe, he will still get out in the elections. and now something will have to be attributed to someone, and a struggle will unfold around this, and such adequate statements that where we got in and how we get out of here good thing they show up. we will now break for a short advertisement. after that , let's talk about the disappointment that vladimir zelensky is waiting for at the nato summit.

in a land where eternal snow and cold in earflaps go all year round and to warm up after drinking a lot , squatting all the people fly unknown to us to novoseyorsk, to attack, and at one secret base you can take corn syrup . . he even solves problems in space with a wrench. here is the gym for members, only it is open and somewhere in the background is wonderful, she will scald the floating legs, the head of the finger with screws, scraping the bottom so the americans see our russian world in their cinema. tomorrow at pervyy

tam-tam-tam-tam-tam-to-to-tam pay pay ozon card cashback up to 25% open for free in the ozon bank application. suddenly, the right one for a long time did not communicate with the scammer. play the lead role, of course, that i can. and why bondarchuk could not, but did not answer, probably, was busy mts will return your trust to unfamiliar numbers, smart defender system get rid of unwanted calls. the circle is not enough taste, it's time to switch to the holy spring. tune in for purity of taste.

wow, when you see a juicy summer sale on yandex.market, buy persil washing capsules at a 62% discount . i have children. will be in seventh heaven from the most delicate taste of moscow gourmet rosbank real opportunities all day long on your feet and your back gets tired on a daily basis, but how to protect your joints portneo just one capsule a day to protect your joints and spine? crisp

and juicy crusts from 169 rubles. profitable

stuck sunbathing help need a chain need. the wind needs only the wind. exactly, because ochakovsky kvass refreshes and inspires. in the world of hundreds , you can't. iota says, can you connect 50 gigs and 100 minutes at the lowest price in your region? wow

regards you deserve the name of the honor message very soon november 17th to you. a man with a hostile purpose will be sent across the southern border, nicknamed nadezhda georgy zhzhonov in the legendary serial spy detective on june 17 on saturdays on the first meeting of nato defense ministers in brussels this is the last meeting of defense ministers on the eve of their own need in vilnius, which will take place in early july and the main question , of course, is what to do with ukraine

, which requires it to be provided with a clear plan for the schedule of its entry into nato but that a common denominator, which is now obviously being formed, and in anticipation of something they themselves will surely cause. the zelensky and kiev regimes are very deeply disappointed, because no schedule plan for joining nato will offer it any guarantees at all. will offer, but are made a surrogate, namely , the transformation of the nato ukraine commission into the council for this ukraine well , some unfounded promises from the series when cancer hangs on highlander. here. um, listen to what the british map says about this. at the nato summit in vilnius next month, ukraine will not be offered a schedule with specific dates for joining the alliance again, instead , they may be promised a simplified membership procedure, when the participating countries still decide to send proposals for joining this plan,

reflecting the growing consensus of key partners in the western defense alliance will be a disappointment for president volodymyr zelensky, nato members in the alliance's informal structure will also offer post-conflict security guarantees to ukraine, which will likely come in the form of broad commitments to protect ukraine from attacks by russia , they are expected to will continue to supply ammunition and help the ukrainian armed forces to actively move closer to nato, however , the obligations are likely to take the form a generalized agreement at a high level without specific proposals for the supply of weapons. well, the publication of a politician. it is precisely with regard to security guarantees that they write that in fact the west will continue to do what it is already doing now, but with the prospect after the end of the military conflict, listen, the biden administration is working on the possibility of providing ukraine with security guarantees, which contradicts kiev’s desire to receive these guarantees through entry in nato, according to

numerous american and european us officials britain france and germany are essentially ready to formalize military and economic support for ukraine, retaining it even after the end of hostilities with russia. however, neither a bilateral deal nor a multilateral agreement will have the legal force of an agreement in fact four countries. they just offer to extend the current assistance regime for an indefinite period vladimir sergeevich well, they want the united states to take on obligations, not only to enter the war on the side of ukraine, but any they do not want to take clear obligations with respect to ukraine. well, in my opinion, we have passed stoltenberg's statement. but even if this is not entirely true, then i think it reflects the position of the true western countries without a military victory, no one in ukraine well, nato will not accept this is the price that ukraine must pay we have just discussed the entire program and we can say that from this it is infinitely far,

but this is the true position. yes, some countries join nato simply by demonstrating how they can organize parades. the third ready to place at base yourself. but the fate of ukraine to pay may be the last ukrainian, so to speak , to soldiers or the armed forces in order, perhaps, not even to join nato, but to receive some promises. here is the very schedule of the roadmap, that somewhere, sometime, it will still enter. this must be well understood. this is politics. the rest of the west's words with his son, with the aim of once again pushing for more decisive action on the fronts of hostilities. this is a cynical position to all appearances. and well, in the foreseeable future. she will be very clear. it is clear to define, even, if not the position on that , anyway. he has a staff in america in relation to ukraine is 100%. well, here is the conclusion that the ukrainians must draw. even reading this publication, these publications are consumables point a and nothing more

. but, and we often say that the so-called israeli model, which the united states is also pushing now, is unacceptable for russia, junior time wrote that a they are discussing by the members of the congressor the implementation of precisely this israeli model, that is there are no legal security guarantees. but there is such a special relationship and american support. uh, to the military-industrial complex of the corresponding country, but kirill evgenievich that's what the publication wrote about politics, it doesn’t even pull on the israeli model, of course, if they really resemble the budapest memorandum of the second and it will become and i remember that back in 2001 the year when sanctions against belarus were introduced, several asked the united states with a question. but there is also a memorandum of sanctions illegally on what the american embassy gave an official explanation, it still hangs, that the budapest memorandum, it turns out, does not carry and never had a binding character, that is, for the anglo-saxon

civilization. it is extremely important whether it is documentary or not. here, too, they are ready to give any words, because words are worth nothing to give any promises to give any, in general, guarantees of support, while not fulfilling these guarantees in any case. if you suddenly have to, that is, now for everything , in fact, ukraine must play its game to end. well, from the point of view of western investors. all of a sudden, the investment will pay off. well, then, it’s clear that no one wants to take responsibility for being the reason why the nuclear button can be pressed. well, the west certainly wants to, but it wants to maintain military support for ukraine, it wants to turn ukraine into militarized anti-russia on steroids, and this is actually the fundamental principle of this very israeli model, or hybrid and israeli. the korean model, that is, the korean freeze according to the korean scenario and the transformation of ukraine into anti-russia on steroids according to the israeli model, but for this you need to have a sufficient

military-industrial complex to help ukraine listen war is usually a boon for the military industrial complex, but this is not yet the case for the defense industry in europe, more than a year has passed since russia's full-scale invasion of ukraine and contracts were awarded slowly. industrial base of the continent. still in a sorry state. after decades of not funding. in addition, fierce competition outside of europe is on the rise. politics is urging defense companies to produce more, faster , for less, but the companies say they won't get to work until they get legal, binding contracts from the government. as companies ramp up production of weapons. they face issues such as inflation and access to raw materials, microchips and workers civil industry faces the same difficulties, but the military industry is much more difficult, as their factories

produce products on a much smaller scale and therefore it is more difficult for them to access scarce resources. here, uh, everything is obvious and correct. because when there was a cold war of the soviet union, the usa opposed us with 200 or even more reverse concerts. then it all closed and strengthened. now there are no more than ten of the largest concerts that were set up for a different war. and they are all here if you look at the list, these are rocket and space things. yes , no one is in order to re-designate the production of shells. there, cartridges and so on will take at least 5 years, but remember that they also built a post-industrial economy, where they have a service economy , a service economy, there is already a lot of experience and so on. everything industrial is dirty there in china somewhere else and that's what they came with, so uh, if ukraine joins nato, then so molecularly harmful to nato , ukrainian soldiers will simply be

mercenaries there. uh, among nato soldiers and ukrainian the language will probably survive somewhere in canada . well, it seems to me the only possibility. ukraine to join nato is for some parts of the territory of ukraine to become more like romania, yes, because, well, it’s obvious that this is simply evident from the current policy of the biden administration, they will not assume obligations under, e, the guarantees of the fifth article in relation to ukraine well well, that's just not possible, and the biden administration is cynical enough. she wants to continue a proxy war against russia, not entering into a direct military, but a confrontation in order to to protect yourself in terms of waging this very proxy war. it even offers us strategic stability talks to return to full implementation of the start-3 treaty. jake sallion recently said that they are ready to negotiate without preconditions, and arms control after 26, when uh,

the treaty expires and so on. that is, they do not want to go to war. from russia, well, what kind of introduction is this? ukraine can talk and talk? that's just parts. well, uh continuing the european theme, europe is already in full recession, if but in the first months, or rather in the last months of last year, the recession was in germany, now it has spread to the entire eurozone and the discussion has intensified in the european union. let me remind you that the preservation of this veta right is the only instrument of sovereignty left to the eu member states, this the only thing that reminds them and their citizens so far is that they are supposedly sovereign states being asked to abolish. uh, it

's the right to ve it's the right to consensus and go to supermajority voting, and on foreign matters. and just the other day, the foreign ministers of seven countries of the european union germany belgium luxembourg netherlands romania slovenia and spain signed and wrote a corresponding article. e. in the publication of a politician, abolish the right of veto and move to a qualified majority ivan alexei why are they trying to deprive themselves itself as the last instrument of sovereignty and why it is germany that germany is the main instigator of this process . and it's obvious that germany is just blown away as a political player as a foreign policy player and germany somehow needs to maintain control over the european one. e over european

politics. and here is the cancellation of the right branches. how do they hope? it's the most natural and, uh, natural option for them. i mean, uh, they're trying to borrow. here in that food chain that contains everything. they also talked about some kind of greater independence, all americans are their own. uh, they gathered that they shouldn’t go beyond the red flags. and they are here trying. well, at least something to snatch for yourself, yes, to become such looking for e, for europe i apologize for the terminology. but uh, i think that they will not succeed, because, uh, most likely, making this decision will mean that these us , these countries, maybe someone else will join them. they can besiege. first of all, poland, and this american, they are up to them. they won't let you do it at all. i believe that there will be order in europe and there will be order in europe. uh, maybe not even after the end

of the russian special military operation. and after, uh, how and germany will carry out, no matter what means, but some kind of special operation against poland, because until germany returns poland, uh, there’s a geopolitical feeling, but there will be no order in europe and the americans are clearly relying on something that poland must gnaw. uh germany germany is not ready to accept the challenge. and so an attempt to drag through. this decision about means a decision by the majority - this is their attempt. to lay siege to poland, i think that so far they will not succeed with this. we need to be more decisive. well, i don't think that in the near future the countries of the european union will agree to give up the right. veta also needs consensus for this. poland is among these signatories. no,

there is no hungary, and so on, but i want to emphasize that, it seems to me, this call is to abandon the right. this is not only a call to abandon remnants of the super. this is a call to abandon the remnants of democracy in the european union, because now decisions on foreign policy are still made, well, supposedly by democratically elected, and the governments of the member states of the european union, if they refuse consensus, then the decision-making power will pass to a large extent supranational bureaucracy and brussels, which no one chose and which is subject to overseas uncles. here are the perspectives. it was a big game, goodbye.

hello, i'm pilot cosmonaut anton shkappers is a podcast of space stories june 16th anniversary of the 60th anniversary of the first flight of a woman into space june 16, 1963 valentina tereshkova , the first woman to overcome earth's gravity , turned out to be in earth's orbit today in the cosmonaut detachment the only girl, and just recently. she returned from space fighting in there 157 days, she was the first of the russian cosmonauts to fly on the american spacecraft kruin. anya hello first. congratulations on completing that first space flight. tell me how you feel about it flight. thank you very much for your congratulations. i am very glad that i flew on my first space trip me. she really liked the work was very rich feeling of weightlessness, generally impossible to convey.