his units launched a counteroffensive and destroyed the militants. further, the netherlands also concluded a deal with the german defense concern rain metal for the supply of 14 leopard 2 tanks to ukraine, european media reports, citing its sources in nato, that german tanks of various modifications burn well and are blown up by mines, according to footage scattered on the net. here are some new deliveries that are promised to be delivered in january. the rest over the next year also denmark and the netherlands in the company of the usa to britain transfer delivery of hundreds of missiles for air defense systems to ukraine, as reported together in the ministry of defense of the united kingdom, has begun and should be completed in the coming ideas. although nato continues to pump weapons to ukraine. the west is gradually getting tired of the war. on the one side. he demands victories from kiev, on the other hand, he begins to ignore zelensky in switzerland, the appeal to the ukrainian president to the parliamentarians was broadcast during the lunch break, in part

of the deputies of the country's largest party, under this pretext, left the hall, leaving the empty chairs, we fucked the first summer snow fell , the inhabitants of novy urengoy again had to get hats, mittens, warm clothes, the city covered, snowfall with white flakes. sheltered parked cars with shots in social networks is shared eyewitnesses. but north ossetia continues to be flooded with rain in vladikavkaz, rivers have formed on the streets along which cars are floating due to a squally century, power lines have been damaged in several districts in the capital of the republic, a number of settlements have been left without electricity this summer in moscow updated temperature maximum this year , the thermometers rose above 26 °. well, today they will grow even more. such news to this minute . see you soon.

what question interests me? here, again, i'm preventive education, which i'm trying to be here all the time to get through here is what secondary education is. what is this about? here's what i, for example, do not see on this is another problem that worries me very much. we once discussed this with me. i was extremely, practically sharpened, but the orientation of education. that's the ultimate pragmatics. i was preparing a program here for a large training center. and so, my colleagues say to me, here write us a program, as a supervisor. i say well they say, and what will be the benefit of your program? i say, in what sense to pass the exam , that is, we, in principle, operate exclusively with these categories, does the school instill an understanding that knowledge is a value in itself, let's go even higher. that a man is one who seeks the truth.

in general, we shamefully or shamelessly threw out this topic is not in the educational plan. yes it there you are, each on your own, and so on. these are the tasks about this, someone thinks such tasks are worth it. do you feel them, do you put them in front of your teaching staff, well, first of all, you know. we have now probably returned to what it means to be a good person and to be a citizen of one's country. and three degrees. well, let's say love for the motherland is the first. talk about it, but the second is to do something for the motherland, and the third is to be able to donate three absolutely different things. here, probably we are now back to to form, and a moral person is now the first task, and the second. i think we 'll get back to what you're talking about, probably for today. but it is less present so from my point of view. i could be wrong. but in the community

of educators. yes, this is being discussed. it feels like a problem, or is it the destiny of some units, which are some kind of moments you know. there, they periodically produce about how there is not enough, because there were more pressing challenges and problems, so it went a little to the second not denies the importance of instrumentalism. and the practical orientation of education does not bother the level of ideology of teachers, it directly worries a lot. you know, when i was 17-18 years old. i looked at who goes where and me already, well, here are two things. i mean, from your circle here , plus or minus a year or two. yes, who goes to the military and who goes to the teachers, you know? well, the threesomes were those who couldn’t get settled anywhere else , it was a long time ago. it just looked good. you think. someone got better, right? since then, the competition in pedu, caught better, yes, it is fine, but so far those same

people are teaching us, and this is a big problem. yes, different, like people, different teachers can be found there. 5% will always be very doctors, but there are not enough for all five percent. there is really a problem here. what, relatively speaking, is ideological preparation. there is an instrumental school. now it is mainly sharpened into a piece of instrumental prepared , there are some attempts to update the ideological part, but they look let's say. well, not really, well , it's not really difficult, because it's difficult. this reflection. this is the need to solve such complex issues, for example, as a religious philosophical plan. yes, we talked. oh, no, no, that's what you all know there. i think you know the next step. we will have a rethinking, but now the integration of subject areas is already taking place, which is wrong. it is wrong to give children each subject separately, he says, there

is mathematics, only you need it alone . but there is music, but there is a story, they do not intersect in any way. that is , we are talking about such a broad view of the world, that it has all subject areas. they are intertwined. now, if we are talking about such an ideological change in education, then from my point of view, the future lies with this. i already remember at one time, probably, when i taught, i caught myself on the fact that colleagues, as a rule, don’t know, especially if they have better school there, yes, a mathematician is social science there. and what does the other one teach, but if we set a worldview task, this cannot be, but, that is, teachers must understand more or less well and be one way or another in one semantic worldview field. here is something that is being done today. well, at your specific schools, for example. the story is such that we work with those teachers who are here and of course, they are not there. here

is such a cross-functional training. when a math teacher is well versed in the history of teachers, literature is well aware of physics. this is not yet something we can count on. here but nevertheless. here is an idea about cross-subject connections and the integration of the whole program in general. she's cool she can be dragged through some design stories. yes, when we are in a project, children do some kind of project and different knowledge is involved. then we have a system of additional education. and a. it is a bit practical in terms of our training there, and there, too, in general, computer science is one of the coolest subjects that form cross-subject connections, because it can integrate almost the entire pool of school ones. e, items, of course, there is a lot of work to be done. you must be directly a lot of good pedagogical science, so that i would like to pay attention in terms of the school there is such a subject like history is, by the way, a key subject. which ideological pool of skills, of course, he collects things forms.

so now you understand this destructive subject. by studying that version of the history of russia there and the world , by the way, which is now in the modern version of textbooks, which are still of the marxist version, we form the idea that we are some kind of provincial nation that has always had everything is bad. and well, we live like that, okay, but it's not like that, you see, we gave the world first-class literature and science. yes, everything that whatever. yes, that is, well, we have that there are operations and there are a lot of things there, but, unfortunately, this subject is the history of russia , now we are a so-so subject of social science. well , people should have a clear picture of how the state is getting richer and how it lives, and why it doesn’t need gold when it has a simple product and what is not there, there is emptiness. the kids don't understand at all. how are material values ​​created, how is society managed, what does a person as a subject need? can count in this society, well, some legal basis. why don't they have enough, you know? i think you look. what is the story now, relatively speaking, school education corresponds to the realities of the mid-sixties there. well, the last

reboot of the system was something like this then , relatively speaking, the government party had a certain vision that children should know and be able to understand. now we are dealing with a reduced version. here is that same vision, as if there was no rethinking before the assembly, well, some kind of big system. well, we live. with this somehow, firstly, as far as i understand history textbooks different indeed. yes, they are changing now. and the minister recently said that a new textbook has been written, so maybe something is already there. yes, you wanted to propose to my colleague. so he says that in the history of our guys, everyone should bet on the victories of our country. and let's bet on the good in our education with us, er, believe me. she is there too. maybe, now, if we have such a habit of constantly speaking badly, and our teachers in our schools. it seems to me that she has remained so stereotyped. well, we don't see it anymore. good changes, and there are enough of them too . i propose to change our worldview with you.

do you understand him a little? yes, 5% are good. and what can 95% of parents expect, who want better for their children, but they can count on what is, unfortunately, plus on some level of awareness. so, in these 95% of parents, awareness is also not very much. you know about the parent at home can create the right environment for the child. let's start here, you know the percent. do you know the word wednesday, yes, here it is, maybe not strictly on our topic, but i would just like to devote a few minutes to this topic. yes , because the word wednesday is a lot, so i talked in my time with a wonderful philologist, a philosopher teacher. uh, yuri anatolyevich to health. he actively used the word environment. well, almost conditionally, we have yes, and i don’t remember how she started the conversation. he says, at the age of 5 i ran to my mother. i asked, i know all the bad words, and my mother said, and i know them, and dad knows them, but it’s not

customary with us. and this is not how we do it. yes, what creates the environment. it's just really great. yes, that's what is accepted, in general, the whole culture about it is accepted. this is not accepted by the school and the family, and we are all the church and society there. we all owe this family together, in general this is the main environment that forms everything, you understand, this is the main one now i ask why children do not read. so parents do not read, reading family, know what happens to children here is a child. yes, he is still a year old, and he is already taking a book and poking a book with his fingers, despite the fact that he is holding the book upside down, because he is so round, it is clear that we remind those very bad parents who are so dragged on by the pope. smoking is bad, right? today we are gathering our thoughts about what and how they teach or should teach a modern school olga alexandrovna dmitrieva director of the shuvalov school in moscow, its electric, uskov, founder of a school and a university in yoshkar-ola. i am

vladimir legoy. let's continue. all the same, i want to discuss one, but a pragmatic topic, because it comes up all the time. here you can't get away from it. this is the exam and the pros and cons of the exam as briefly as possible. yes what to be afraid of, what not to be afraid of. well, i would like to say there are no ideal things at all, including any ideal toolkit, but for today. this is so far the only such mass, and objective control and measuring materials, my observations show that no miracles have happened in the sense that someone, as he studied for 11 years, gets approximately the same plus or minus results in points. that is, in principle, the use does not spoil these conversations about being 11 years old. no it's not gonna get a deuce so let's talk facts. i hope the exam is about education. it's about academic integrity.

it's about diligence, it's about getting together, it's about being able to manage your time and a lot, a lot, which is also in principle, modern children train from elementary school, and in these control and measuring forms, so it's familiar to them . uh, what i paid attention to there is the main one, and such a message goes so that there is no training at the unified state examination yes, so that real knowledge is not lost behind this, but for this it seems to me that we see this problem, and we are already changing, for example, we now have such an interesting format in moscow, that is, the guys finish the eleventh grade and all the required subjects until february. and since february , we are purposefully introducing a new timetable for a new practice. we are only preparing for the unified state examination and they are level, for example, one needs to compete for 100 points with the other at the minimum. since february, the eleventh grade is a very interesting project. it will pass now, we will be ready

to share it. and basically, i think that here are the changes to the federal curricula, that's all subjects are important, this will also help us get away from training at the exam. i think that i have an ambivalent attitude towards the exam on the one hand. i agree with olga alexandrovna. this is a good tool that measures the quality of school preparation on a single scale throughout the country. well, the way she is, let's say. yes , and this is also a transparent way to enter a university , which is also important, yes, and this is its value, what is the problem with the use. i see that the unified state examination has remained practically the only contour of effective management education, what we write in the unified state examination will be taught that way. you know, well, excuse me, this is, well, wrong. there should be a different education management circuit that forms the agenda, understanding the quality of training at all levels, and so on. e teacher training system. well, and other things. this is practically non-existent, so the teachers

went down because they just work out so that the exam is good, especially in the senior classes, this problem. but colleagues, and picking up what you said, here's what you think. here's what i see, again how university teacher who comes. here, uh, i look at there when i run into teenagers there, here are my kids in middle school now. yes, i understand that they teach a lot of interesting things. they have such a big rich context on different subjects. well, whatever you say, and then the time comes for the oge first, then the exam they are told, so guys, the school is over, the school is over. we are now preparing, that is, relatively speaking, you have chosen these triggers. and you're not even three subjects. you don't study three subjects. and you preparing for the exam in these three subjects, it loads this one so much, i perfectly understand how to teach, that any oral exam is more subjective than a test. well , let’s talk, if you didn’t understand something, the child said something, he wanted to say, you heard one thing, another element of subjectivity is always present in an oral interview