when the officers of the bulldozer, i wish you well , mr. commander-in-chief, you have an order to wait until you appear. it's me who is waiting for me, and no one who should appear here. i know who you are, but we have orders not to let anyone through until further notice. open your eyes. fedorovich forgive me for making you wait, that you barely got it stuck and on the road you are not complaining to my mother. you ivanovich decide which of us is a senator. let me explain. and what does it mean all the military parade that you gathered here.

your field marshal? leave her for the colonel rest. we will figure it out ourselves, remove is remove. tell katerina alekseevna that i will soon go and inquire about pavel petrovich's well-being

. it is urgent to see ekaterina alekseevna, it is important for her herself, she is in danger. hey damn wait wow where did you look for him? i wish i knew so i set aside. i asked you

a question. sorry. his green came to me. i know it's not allowed during service. they go to arrest without cold, then books. anyone understand.

petrovna katya dear, is this a disaster? the big game is on the air today president vladimir putin held a meeting with the permanent members of the security council, where the president made one very important statement . and it looks like the western allies of ukraine really decided to fight with russia until the last ukraine, however, we must proceed from the fact that the offensive potential of the enemy has not been exhausted , strategic reserves are not yet involved, and i ask you to keep this in mind when

building combat work. and defense minister sergei shoigu announced that russia is forming a new army, a new corps, which will be ready. to action already at the end of this month with us. now lieutenant general yevgeny burinsky, who is a regular participant in our program and is well aware of what it means to organize new large military units, general. thanks dmitry, i will start with the first statement about the loss of e ukrainian thieves forces during a special military operation, especially after the start of their e, offensive operation. he must say that the president quite rightly noted that the equipment yes, the losses of equipment are large and tanks

a lot of armored fighting vehicles. i won't repeat the numbers. they have already been voiced several times, so to speak. and as for the personnel of 13,000, according to the calculations of our ministry of defense, this is a lot. it's a lot it's irrevocable. yes, as i understand it, but in general, ukraine now uh has several such problems related to personnel, firstly, uh, in addition to, uh quantitative uh, loss indicators are very important, uh qualitative. uh, loss structure. it is, of course, unfavorable for ukraine because , according to western estimates, these are western estimates, but almost 80%, uh, after all, the west began to train the ukrainian armed forces immediately after the events of 2014, for eight years they trained

the ukrainian armed forces in their training centers on the territory of ukraine uh, they prepared so now uh 80 % of those trained professional contract soldiers who, moreover, have combat experience. they have already been knocked out, but in execution it comes at the expense. these are precisely those mobilized whom they, well, roughly speaking , catch on the streets of cities frontier, but in general, such a rather socialist picture. uh, people without experience without special training, of course, uh represents a very unreliable fruit for future offensive operations. what ukraine is probably planning and the second moment, that uh, there is an acute shortage of officers, especially in the mid-level link. uh, major lieutenant colonel and third. eh, moment, this is what

they have turned into adopting the western model, primarily the american one. an officer from the organizers of hostilities from the organizer on the battlefield and leadership of their units in such a manager, who is remotely from a control point, which are, let's say, in the depths. uh, defense directs the actions of units, and on the battlefield they are controlled by sergeants. well, in a pinch, there are non-commissioned warrant officers who, uh, of course, do not have that training and that experience. what the minister of defense said about the uh training of two reserve armies and one corps. this is in general, this was to be expected, because, uh, i think hardly anyone assumed that the russian the armed forces will sit on the defensive

and only repel the offensive. eh, there are many such parallels of historical battles in ukraine now. so. uh, you, uh , probably know better than me that as a historian. and what role did the steppe front play in the kursk operation? yes, it was a reserve front, a steppe front. he was entered. e, in. uh, the battle was at the most decisive moment, when, in fact, it was going on, well , such a not very not very favorable situation developed for the tank army under uh, the command of the mouth of mr., uh, repelled went over to the german troops and later went on the offensive with the subsequent development of events that are known to everyone so, uh, two reserve armies, taking into account previous statements by the minister of defense that there are already 114.000 new contract soldiers who signed a contract with the ministry of defense plus uh, 50.000 .

uh, volunteers that is, 170,000 - this is exactly the digital parameter that fits in two e in common with the hf army. and uh, their body is um. i think that, of course, they are not designed to strengthen the defense. a they will not be pulled apart; they will not be stratified in parts. i am sure that they will not be used to simply rotate and replace those people who are now on the line of combat, contact and heroically conduct, e, military operations to repel the offensive of the ukrainian armed forces and this is exactly the, e kulak, who will introduced into battle, well, let's not guess about the direction, but which will be introduced into battle and e into battle precisely for the purpose of conducting an offensive operation, our armed forces already. and uh, in general, ukraine use your spare parts.

prepared by nato not only for military purposes, but also for psychological warfare , declaring for many weeks now, so that they are fighting until they are fighting at full strength, and they have such capabilities, and now russia answered dmitry i, in- first, i categorically disagree with the statements that ukraine has not yet started anything, that they have only such a so -called probing. reconnaissance in combat is nothing like that after all. uh, they have several teams of three already. uh, change the composition. it's theirs ukrainian statement. yes, these are ukrainian statements. and so, according to estimates, there the number of already disabled brigades ranges from two to four already in practice. maybe four brigades are completely disabled. if we take the figures that were previously voiced by uh western, so to speak, partners of ukraine and

, uh, the ukrainian command itself. uh, the number of trained brigades. uh, ranged from 12 to 18. that is. uh, already 25% of the group that ukraine was preparing for this offensive operation. they are without nitrogen losses. that's a lot, that's a lot in 18 days. and if the grinding of ukrainian units continues at such a pace, then, of course, there will be no success. they will not achieve even minimal success, but now, if they mentioned, uh, an example, uh, the kursk bulge. now i'm thinking a little guess about something else about the battle for moscow, when there was very strong pressure from the german armies, and for those who were at the front, it was very difficult and many wondered, huh? and where are our reserves, where is the wife and the siberian army and stalin was under a lot of pressure? not me to you

to say that these reserves that were coming to siberia to use in parts, stalin categorically refused. yes, and on december 5 , the famous soviet offensive began, and it seems to me that now the supreme commander makes it clear that russia is ready for any options. i completely agree, dmitry, i will repeat once again that, as a rule , strategic reserves, and here we are talking about strategic reserves that are not intended simply for replenishment of, uh, units that are engaged in active hostilities. this is exactly the one, uh fist that designed for decisive action. e. i hope that these will be actions, and not actions to repel the ukrainian offensive evgeny thank you very much. i think you are right. if offensive actions are considered, but one way or another, not only military dynamics, but if you want

, the psychological dynamics, it, of course, changed in favor of russia after this statement of the generals, of course, it changed moreover, you know these last days, because very there are many testimonies of our correspondents and our e commanders who are fighting, the ukrainians are surrendering, and already whole units are surrendering. this is a very bad signal. why is it giving up? because they explain, i was captured somewhere. i'm practically unprepared . they showed me how to hold machine guns. how to shoot from it and everything and go. that is, the so-called these meat assaults. it's a term, of course i don't really like it, but uh, it's already so to speak. e, widely used on and including e in ukrainian publics. uh, of course, they just crack the psychological personality structure. those units that have to

conduct active combat operations, the general is huge to you. thank you. we hope to see you on our live soon. thank you dmitry thank you let's get back to advertising in just a few minutes and talk about how and why the numerous warnings to the american leadership that nato expansion could lead the united states to big trouble were ignored. space reconnaissance marks in square 48 major construction. i think she's worried that hope failed reacted to your scout. if it was logical with me , the situation began to give a show , it would be required of you, just a little. some not significant details in the work of your institutes in

the movie destiny. well, how are you doing? i don’t know, if he checks, everything will be very good , he will receive 1,000 rubles for inviting friends to tinkoff until june 30, and together participate in the drawing of 100 million rubles. i do not like monday, there are reasons to visit the earth today. monday is the day of gifts on my

planet, the good mood of subscribers is a priority. the explosive taste of ice cream cheerful cactus will give a holiday to your taste buds ice cream

pure line, please your taste buds. opens the door. fantastic shopping and sales, any purchases will become even more pleasant with installments for 10 months and cashback up to 10% halva just one card for all purchases all day on your feet and your back gets tired because of work. i lead a sedentary lifestyle, just one capsule a day to protect the joints and spine.

the third column is ready with your fresh croissants and cocoa to go international brand you boyle friendly service awaits you here cozy cafe and high-quality fuel ok? as the house plays every second ticket rather for tickets stuck help is needed. the wind needs only the wind for sure.

the tinkoff app brings joy to people . tinkoff is the only one. everything is fine. i have never been so normal. i wake up earlier than before to rise above myself and find the strength to put off giving time to the most important thing, when sport is the norm of life.

there's a big game on the air in washington and in the administration and in congress they constantly say that the russian special operation in ukraine was aggression. by the way, they don’t just say aggression to them. it seems to be little spoken unprovoked illegal and cruel. that's what i wanted to see. what are the roots of this operation, and especially how can this operation be called unprovoked, i will not begin from our time. and with a warning about the intervention of the conflict in europe from the first of my point of view, the greatest american president george washington in

in his farewell message to the nation, washington specifically warned of the danger for the united states to get involved in european conflicts and choose its favorites and, accordingly, opponents in these conflicts. let's hear what george washington said about this at the end of the 18th century. he had just completed his two terms as president of the united states and was saying goodbye not only to the president but also to politics. excessive benevolence towards one foreign state and excessive hostility towards another leads to the fact that those in relation to to whom these feelings are manifested, they see danger only on the one hand and do not notice the insidious influence on the other , true patriots are able to resist intrigues and favorita arouse suspicions of hatred, while the victims of deceit receive applause and the trust of the people, giving its interests, closer

to our time already after the end of world war ii, perhaps the most respected american diplomat was jordenon, the one who wrote the so-called long telegram to the american leadership, where he warned of the need for containment of the soviet union, so back in the early nineties, when it was first mentioned. that possibility of nato expansion letchin sounded the bell. and he began to warn about what a terrible mistake it was. let's hear what he said in february 1997. an extension to this would be the most fatal mistake of american policy in the entire period after the cold war, such a decision could ignite nationalist anti-western and militaristic sentiments in russian public opinion and lead its foreign policy to

direction decidedly unfavorable for us did not stop there and made one statement to another. let's listen to what he said already in the ninety-eighth year on the pages of the new york times. i think that this is the beginning of a new cold war and the russians will gradually react quite negatively and this will affect their policy of nato expansion - a tragic mistake. there was no reason for this, no one threatened anyone. it would make the founding fathers of this country roll over in their graves. we subscribed to the protection of a number of countries. although we have neither the resources nor the intention to do so. this serious nato expansion was just a reckless move by a senate that has no real interest in foreign affairs. uh, george canon was a truly outstanding person, but you also perceived as, well, if you like, a somewhat extravagant e not a marginal, but a person who refused to follow the party

line, and in general they listened to him, but often considered possible to ignore it, but at the same time, serious warnings about the danger of nato expansion came from people who worked for the american government. and so, let's look at a few e warnings that came from william burns, who in the nineties was a high-ranking official, and the american embassy in moscow and then became an american word in russia, let's hear it. the first statement struggles over this. this is what he wrote in his telegrams to the state department. the issue of nato expansion and the admission of russia's former allies under the warsaw pact into this organization was not so easy for yeltsin

and the russian elite believed, and largely rightly, that the guarantees given by jim baker during the german unification talks in 1990, when he said that nato would not be expanded an inch to the east , remained in force after the collapse of the soviet union as well. you see, this pihet is already the head of the political department, and the american embassy in moscow but, and later, but burns said. to what extent ken was right in his point of view, i emphasize not somewhere he stated, but again in telegrams to the state department to the secretary of state. let's let's listen. we made a really serious strategic mistake, and here kenan turned out to be a visionary later, when , by inertia, they began to push ukraine and georgia to join nato, despite russia’s strong historical ties with both of these states , from its objections even sharper than in the case of the central europe thereby. we caused irreparable

damage to our relations with the russians and provoked the desire of the future russian leadership to get even with us in another telegram. uh, bernes warned of their superiors, that the opposition to nato expansion to bringing ukraine into nato, that it was not just the opinion of the russian president, but of the russian leadership, was indeed shared by almost everyone in russian society. let's listen. a month after the conclusion of clinton's visit to moscow, we sent a telegram to washington in which we indicated in no other area the lack of opportunity to participate in the process or attempts to use russia's weakness to our advantage without hurting the feelings of russians as much as in the field of european security in the broadest sense of the russian elite unanimous opinion that the expansion of nato - this is bad and point to conclusion. we have made it quite clear that the russian elite considers the expansion of the thoth and the bosnian problem to be part of the same process, and it can

be assumed that the role of the thoth in bosnia only reinforces russia's suspicion of its expansion. i'm sorry that i give so many quotes, but it's really important for me to show that if someone in washington was ready to hear, then there are more warnings than there was enough, including from the most unexpected people in terms of, uh, to try to take into account russian concerns and look for mutual relations. on sins. let's see what such a person, traditionally considered an emotional enemy of russia, said about ukraine's membership in nato, like from bigney to georgian. the united states must show russia that we have its interests in mind we expect that ultimately ukraine's position as a truly european eu democracy will not entail nato membership in the united states should

negotiate with moscow to cool down the crisis and to some extent normalize relations. that is, even the georgians did not consider it expedient to invite ukraine to nato, and even the georgians believed that it was necessary to negotiate with russia on this matter , and even this position is one of the main ones in washington. hawks of polish origin. even this position was completely ignored. okay, well, they can answer me. ok, but there were reasons to be afraid of bringing ukraine into nato, and there were reasons to think that the leadership had serious concern. well, what does it not mean that russia had the right to use armed force to use armed force against another sovereign

state. well, of course, i should immediately notice that, of course, ukraine is a sovereign state. this sovereignty was completely ignored in 2014, when a coup d'etat was actually carried out in ukraine under western patronage. but this is not the only thing, when the united states and some other states are facing threats to their security or with some phenomena that they consider as such a threat, the united states is not at all embarrassed. and when they need to warn that they will not allow something, and if necessary. will go to the use of military force. let's listen here. how president biden handles this issue when it comes to iran you said that you

guarantee that iran will not acquire nuclear weapons, does that mean you could use force against iran as a last resort this issue with israel. do you have any guarantees, i will not go into this topic, but iran should not get nuclear weapons. you see, i won’t allow it, we won’t allow it. iran should not get nuclear weapons. although, by the way, there is no international law that would prohibit it. uh, uh, it's not early to have a nuclear weapon, and iran had an understandable concern that israel had nuclear weapons, okay, but let's hear what the prime minister says, you're not the prime minister of israel about the possibility of developing early nuclear weapons. i have a clear message and a wound to the international community, israel will do whatever is necessary to prevent iran from obtaining

a nuclear weapon. i mean, see right now, uh, these days there are direct statements from american israeli leaders that if they encounter something that they consider to be a threat to the national security of their countries, they will use armed force. okay, someone will tell me, then, just words. well, firstly, these are not words, if you look at how many iranian scientists were killed as a result of terrorist attacks iranian physicists, and this was done by israel, as there are many reports with the participation of the united states, you will understand that these are far from just words. well , let's look at relatively recent stories, the united states in the eighties invaded when reagan a was president in haiti and overthrew the legitimate government there.

in the 1980s, under the senior president of the bay, the united states invaded panama because the then ruler of panama, narega , was trying to limit the american right to control the panama canals. came crinkled leg. then, of course, at the end, and in the 1990s, already under president clinton , there were strikes against serbia, a massive very hard bombing of serbia, and without a corresponding resolution of the security council, he unambiguously attacked serbia, the united states and nato countries did not attack. but then everyone knows how president burg jr. invaded iraq, overthrew saddam hussein of the iraqi government and there were no weapons of mass

destruction, and it was these weapons that were the pretext for the american action. well, we are all we know how the united states and its allies overthrew and killed the ruler of libya, moana. gaddafi already in 2011. well, you know, after that, say seriously that russia did not have the right to use force against ukraine it seems to me, it seems to me that this is just ridiculous and , uh, i will add. military pressure. direct attack against donetsk lugansk why do i mention this to you? yes, because i mention that when the united states struck serbia, the argument was that, and serbia used very harsh methods

to suppress the albanian population, kosovo, and under this pretext an aggression against serbia was committed that even high-ranking american diplomats recognized what it was? as they delicately expressed themselves , any technical violation of international law if the united states had the right to attack serbia. why did russia not have the right and obligation to protect the russian people in donetsk and luhansk with us. now a regular participant in our program, an outstanding political scientist and philosopher alexander dugin alexander e, where i'm wrong, you're completely right. here one can recall both afghanistan and the invasion of pakistan when bin laden was caught, this is a violation of sovereignty, but this is already understood, in the west there is such an author of red

who wrote a wonderful book sovereignty organized hypocrisy. he argues in his book that not every formally modern state is such, in fact. here the united states is truly sovereign and so superior. according to krasner. all the rest of the powers that they have the right , relying on their own sovereignty to protect it, to violate, when they need it , the sovereignties of all the other powers openly in this regard. the so-called attacking realism in american e -political thought is a fairly honest description of how americans themselves see who the good guy is. who is bad? acting in the american interests, these are the good guys and their sovereignty is recognized if they dare to say something against american policy. they are losing the right to this sovereignty

, and it is technically violated. the problem is that the americans really do not consider russia a sovereign power, do not consider it equal to themselves, do not consider that we have sovereignty, at least remotely similar to america. and, accordingly, they deny us the right to behave in the same way as they behave in this , this is the problem. it's not even double standards. this is a representation of the world order, either it is on the polar and then there is only one pole in which decisions are made, or it is more than a unipolar two-polar three polar multipolar russia at the end of a special operation in ukraine said there are not only american policies. in today's world, we are also a fully sovereign state and we will defend our national interests in similar situations in which you used direct intervention invasion we will act the same when it comes to

our vital interests next to us when it comes to the fate of our people , this is perfectly natural for the pole, but fat is completely unacceptable for you. that is, if we all live in a unipolar world, where we recognize the polarity of the highest authority of the united states of america and its political course, namely the globalist one, not of those, but of the moderate and fairly balanced intellectuals and politicians in whom you have listed. eh, they were by no means friends of russia, not canon, especially in life, but nonetheless. they had a fraction of realism. alexander here, explain to me. oh well, canon he was, distinguished by a somewhat eccentric good. some other people of the professor, former diplomats signed the statement against the nato decision was ignored on the principle that they are outside the administration.

and who they are they wrote to several administrations from moscow, american ambassador billburns, who, by the way, enjoyed such confidence that , when he was returned to ichnton, he was made deputy secretary of state for political affairs, and then i will make him first deputy secretary of state, then they made him director of the cia, which he is today. why such a person? here was the bans, why was his warning ignored? i i think that we are talking about the fact that the current american elite, and these are not only democrats, this is a private cons and the republican party. now it's simple. very powerful people in what is called in the american deep state, which is beyond democrats and republicans. they are still convinced that now, after the collapse of the ussr, there is a unique period when the americans can insist on their global dominance, strengthen and maintain their

hegemony, and they tend to get carried away with this dream, if you like, they believed that it was already at arm's length, fukuyama hastened to announce the end of history, that is, the complete victory of the united states for the global west over all alternatives, and they do not want to say goodbye to this illusion. despite what the realists tell them, look, this is no longer possible. you can't hold the lead so hard you have to share. at least to distribute some powers and nevertheless. this is a globalist, the top, which, by the way, is the opposite of the line of american isolationism in washington. but these are the investigators. here are ravilson's 14 points democracy when the american president is violated at the beginning of the last century a and wilson violates the tradition of american neutrality of not interfering in european affairs while mindful of his own fight against british imperialism. here, spitting on all these

traditions, wilson says no. now. we take the flag from britain that we will defend democracy on a global scale from now on. in america , two centers of solution are emerging - these are the supporters of the classical american position of neutrality of a certain isolationism trump is a representative, in general , american realism of this trend america furs. yes, america will be the first america will be better, but it will not interfere. where did the second wilsonian get into all the processes of world politics. uh, the line that is more and more on the mountain, and now the momentum is here the biden administration is a supporter of this approach, and this is what they have appropriated themselves the right to be the world policeman only the defenders of the rights of liberalism democracy today lgbt artificial intelligence has been added to them and a few more new dopofiminisms of ecology. and these values, they consider it their duty.

this is the elite, the ruling elite, to protect and assert at any cost, pay no attention to anything, that is, in this respect, russia , which is said to be sovereign, that it has its own interests, its traditional values. this is, in fact , a real enemy not for america, but for this group of american politicians, ideologists and for them, any attempt to correlate, er, with their ideology, the fanatical ideology of domination some twisted version of the american dream like himself? and buchanov once said that america in the 2020th century acquired the whole world, but lost itself, and therefore. it's definitely very accurate very accurate we're leaving for advertising, we'll be back in just a few minutes. our task was to complete the entire flight program and to conclude the landing without

a ship on a parachute, all the cosmonauts from the first detachment knew that they would definitely eject. they have no other way to land; dolgov was appointed commander dr. ivanovich, this is his workplace . second pilot, nikolayevich andreev, he was stationed nowhere. here he pulled out the handle from the console and ejected his jump was very risky, because, in principle, he could not lose consciousness. i am already looking at a height of 19,000 m. at this height, the fall occurs at the highest speed. this is minus 50. there 60 - 70 is much more than a person without special equipment can move just admire this person, because the height is 24.000 suit. it's not just a feat. now that would be insane. from space tomorrow on the first sale from

june 14 you will have time for 399 polesie toy set for 599 teeth whitening set for 749 halva card opens the door. in the world of fantastic shopping, even during the period of discounts and sales, any purchases will become even more pleasant with an installment plan for 10 months and a cashback of up to 10% halva is just one card for all purchases now kfc for 169 rubles. hello , i can play the lead role, of course. and why bondarchuk could not, but did not answer, probably, he was busy mts

will return your trust to unfamiliar numbers, smart system protector will get rid of unwanted calls. it is difficult to choose a car, whoever fits the car does not fit the price, then it fits, the price does not fit the car, and when you find the perfect car with the perfect price, the count goes for seconds. issue a tinkov car loan for both a new and a used car tinkov, he is such a one-of-a-kind purchase of the grain edge class, 1.25 liters. 62-99 have already been forgotten. what is good sleep good sleep is welson is not addictive.

you don’t understand the data, now i’ll explain everything in the post office, on the contrary, for a closed loan, the post office, the bank pays money to you increase the loan with the guaranteed rate service on time, and the bank will recalculate it at 4% per annum and return the difference. come for money post office bank. new collections of clothes for the whole family from mi acaro and other brands. choose bright images for the summer with discounts on wildberries this week basque duet for 349 rubles. in the kfc application, it's easy to get it just got up to 5 million, dreams come true, but sometimes they need help. wind

then we were the first to launch sms, we were the first to connect the connection in the subway and climbed higher everyone, so that you communicate not only with words, but also with pictures, stickers, circles, rims. and if you need words again, say them, looking into your eyes, which is now available to all subscribers. switch to megafon 1.000 rub. for inviting friends to tinkoff until june 30 and together participate in the drawing of 100 million rubles.

antifreeze tool tomorrow on the first and always on 1tv.ru you wrote a very important article where you compare the struggle between russia and the collective west in the first place with the united states of the chess game and you, and developed and refined this idea with the help of

artificial intelligence. tell us what are the main groups now, but interacting here in this chess game, continuing the metaphor of the same brzezinski, whom i met in washington in 2005, the only time i was invited to the usa after that was never invited again. i applied this metaphor to ukraine . incidentally, the female about it. we also wrote the great chess board. he said that russia without ukraine is not an empire. it will never be an independent pole. russia with ukraine is an independent pole. from here, following the covenant, but this is the indian version of geopolitics and provoked, i completely agree with you provoked conflict today, but if you go to this model, you can say that ukraine is a chessboard.

ah, but those who play this bloody chess of war from both sides are not one, uh , not one center, and on our side on the american side there are three pieces of three poles, if you like, and on the american side there are those which are absolutely radical we are convinced that now the moment has come to finish off russia. taking advantage of the fact that we are now drawn into this conflict in this war. they think we've shown weakness. and that it is necessary to support ukraine in every possible way, what about nuclear weapons? we will never resort, and therefore we must put pressure on the offensive, fire on our territory, supply long- range missiles. uh, long-range combat, uh, blow up uh, then e northern, that is , to carry out a terrorist attack inside the country of russia itself in order to put an end to and achieve an immediate victory over russia, this is one of the centers associated with them certainly not only america is part of the american stem, to, well, the british, who dream of losing, er, a powerful

slave. these are radical forces. in ukraine, they also operate, relying on the most radical ukrainian politicians who cross any red lines that can only draw a second, more moderate policy. they also want to withdraw russia, they also want to remove this obstacle in the way of the global american world order. but they would agree to a delayed victory. and that's why they never directly support the actions of these most radical forces, sometimes they criticize them. in your program, we have repeatedly cited such cases when they refuse what is then a terrorist attack or on the spot. they stand west america cia mi-6, they are trying to write it off on the ukrainians themselves. well, of course, the ukrainians. here, from a purely instrument and the decision to take another western party, if you like. yes, there are people, about whom you spoke today, who

actually believe that america should strengthen itself in itself supporters. political realists such as canon, like trump for example, there are a lot of them, many of the us military adhere to this position. they understand that this game is on the edge and it is impossible to provoke russia. so. i think that today the party of the west’s immediate victory over us is strong enough and perhaps even somewhat stronger is the party of postponed victories that would make some concessions freezing hostilities reduction terrorist attacks or bringing this conflict to some kind of rules. they are also strong in general. biden is probably somewhere in between . well, there are those supporters of the classical american policy of non-intervention, who also exist, who , to be honest, do not care about russia or putin, they care. oh america and they in general

. hmm, believe that this conflict is, in fact, admit that it is provoked. and if the west stops provoking this and ends up talking about it often, trump has three centers on our side. this it is already more interesting that here we also play from more than one pole. first, we have a fifth column, that is, national traitors. there liberals have a liberal position, which generally operates such as khodorkovsky's oh classic uh, a number of supporters of the enemy supporters. so let's hear what e recently said one of the people in this category of people who are hungry for the defeat of russia, in this case i'm talking about their champions. chess said. it is necessary that russia lost lost crushingly, because this unity is a chance for my country to return community of civilized countries, because only a crushing military defeat can

somehow affect the consciousness of a society that is infected with the virus of imperialism. well, you can't say it any clearer, can you? and this person i want to draw your attention to. he's not just talking about getting a win over putin or the current russian government more broadly. he wants the defeat of his entire country of his people. no, absolutely openly without hesitation. there are few such people now, but there are people in our country with similar glances, and this is one of the poles, and not, as it were, is on our side. they are russians. they are here or our former ones, but they are fully integrated, let's say, in our country. they probably aren't. well, on this side of the border, let's just say, yes, it is located on this side of the border from new york. it's true.

but there is to be here, and on honey-bearing chariots, right? start chopping off the head, like kasparov yes, where are those who fled? yes, but there are also representatives of this fifth column inside. now there is a more interesting moment, the sixth column. this is our westerners who do not want the defeat of our country, but they are not completely unprepared for victory. they believe that it would be good to return everything to the situation before february 24, 22. it would be good to restore our relations with the west. if for this you have to make compromises, including on the territorial relatively new subjects, and the russian federation may be crimea or some other conditions, if only to stop this conflict, even not with ukraine, ukraine also does not give a damn, like everyone else the rest of the participants, except for the victory party , except for us patriots e, and a, they don’t give a damn, but they are ready to give up anything in

order to restore relations with the west, because for them the west is light. that is, i called it a party from they do not directly perform. not against russia, they can even support their own, but at every opportunity they tend to not take any e and the most mobilization steps in order to preserve the economy, politics, lifestyle, value system, and leave the orientation to the west, as a universal measure, as it is and there is another pole of the victory party that understands, which you consider yourself to be. i think that we belong to this party, uh, we are the majority of the people , the president is unconditional. and those people who are aware. it may even be a question, not so much, but a question of moral choice. how much is the question of understanding the seriousness of the threat that hangs over us. this is what makes people members of the victory party, understanding the seriousness - this is the challenge that

is thrown to us, the understanding that the very historical existence of russia of our people, our states. our civilization is now in question, if we do not get together and do not gain victory with all our might, then we will end and the worst wishes of our enemies will come true two questions. important from my point of view the first question is how to win? when the entire collective west in nato is against russia , 31 countries, and more than 50 countries supply weapons to ukraine broad and meaningful. and than simply, let's say, but not to force ukraine to give russia some

part of the territory that russia legally considers its own, but let’s also change zelensky and the second question and the second question. what this victory should be made of in order to understand how this victory can be achieved, it is important to understand that you understand the subtext here, and i will share my ideas with me. they may not be entirely correct, but i will express them, firstly, i believe that the bar that we must cross. this is the extent to which we need to expand, we should not be drawn into a straight line the conflict with the nato countries, despite their active support for ukraine, is now the line that we ourselves should not cross, the second we should not, uh, focus on the use of nuclear weapons. we will always use it in case of emergency , all our officials, starting with the president, have already said this many times. this is

the most serious statement. but this is an extreme case, this is in case of inevitable defeat in other areas. so this is our last chance. we must use nuclear weapons only when there is an extremely critical situation for russia as such, but there remains a spectrum of those actions that we can use. i think that we should win a military victory in ukraine over the nazi regime with which we are going, in fact, military operations. we must realize the set goals of a special military operation, that is, to achieve the demilitarization and denecification of this territory, to give an opportunity, and to the people who will be freed from this skills and liberate the entire territory of ukraine it will turn out differently, because no matter how we move our territory. i think that at some point our offensive will begin. and

i'm sure it will be successful too. may not be easy. maybe it will require a huge huge effort, but no matter what territory, but from ukraine, we did not leave the nazi regime, in the meantime , no press-healthy that they will voluntarily change the thermobe of western support. here, whatever territory we leave, it will continue. they will bombard our new territories from the position that stay with them, they will continue the attacks. they will continue to attack us in every way. and the west and nato will still be even on the island that remains, and from ukraine , if it remains there, that political regime, this is 12 we will not be able to deal with ukraine until the nazi regime is there. we must change it. and accordingly, we can not sleep peacefully, yet. there you are ready for the sake of it for great efforts for great sacrifices throughout.