the most important thing is the future profession and we will be able to further multiply the traditions of our school and serve the motherland. i am very grateful for these 7 years, because i was able to learn a lot , found true friends and this day is very important for me, because i am finishing school and i am very happy, but not sad, because i do not want to leave everything to the people's pension . these 7 years have been challenging, fun , good, wonderful. i decided to connect my life with medicine. i enter the military academy named after sergei mikhalchik kirov in st. petersburg. the festive mood has not spoiled, gloomy weather today in the capital , rains and thunderstorms promise up to the third monthly rainfall. tomorrow, according to the forecast, it will also be cloudy, but cloudy without precipitation at the beginning of the week will return to the capital region in advance by the next weekend plus 26. in the meantime, the weather is not testing other regions of khakassia. grad of an ice floe. the windshields of the cars were smashed, the summer residents were left without a crop. here. what

a bewitching view the weather conditions bring to sochi flying over the horizon, the cruise liner is an optical illusion pathological organ. the 300th anniversary of perm is celebrated on a large scale in the city, the international degilev hose festival was opened with a world-class performance by the orchestra of theodore renaissance virtuosos. july 2 symphonic chamber concerts opera performances experimental performances, as well as alternative music traditionally will not do without premier for the first time on stage, a performance to the music of igor stravinsky, which combines singing and dance and pantomime and video

installations. that's all i have right now , the heading is the time to visit ekaterina strizhenova is an economist, professor at columbia university in the usa, jeffrey sachs. and many people have been telling me for 30 years in a row. yeah, you created the oligarchs. it's because of you that privatization came. you created a crisis in russia volk on sunday at first pay up to 25 percent open for free in the ozon bank application. crispy

and juicy chicken choose your basset from 169 rubles. what can the application do? tinkoff the tinkoff app makes people happy tinkoff it's the only one oh, sale from june 14, you'll have time for an ultra hd tv for 24.99 president enamel strengthening kit for 599

baby shark dress for 249 easy to arrange just got to 5 million, dreams come true, but sometimes they need help choosing a car is difficult, who fits the car does not fit. the price does not fit the car and when found the perfect car at the perfect price. cinema 1tv presents what kind of building we don't go there was a military base. i don't know why we're in the restricted area. i just arrived yesterday about the restricted zones, i don't know anything. and

you should know to prepare from the mountains of stalin with a completely eastern bloc and a new one we will move into the world. we must stop. i will order this. this is our best agent, his call sign is valkyrie, but i only care about one secret of my family. gave results, there were signs of increased enemy activity. kirii the premiere of a multi-part film

1tv cinema presents well, that's right, only this makes it even scarier. do you want to be infected too? university and president of the united nations network for sustainable development solutions, american professor jeffrey sachs is called one of the world's most influential economists in the world.

solution of international financial crises of national economic reforms to combat epidemics and poverty. strikingly, since 2000, us government debt has risen from about 35% of national income to 100%. and it's very dramatic because we've been waging non-stop wars, literally from the beginning of this century in afghanistan, iraq , syria, libya, and now in ukraine , the white house congresses seem to be responsible for this. there is an all-powerful lobby here, but it is leading us to ruin. after collapse of the soviet union american economist advised the government of poland, russia and ukraine during their adaptation to a market economy. he was the ideologue of the shock therapy policy sachs was the economic adviser to mikhail gorbachev and later to

boris yeltsin this is the slowest stabilization you could experience. this is much slower than what more czech republic estonia slovenia or any other country with high inflation went through. i am convinced that washington's policy has led to the emergence of the ukrainian conflict. you were working on russia's transition to a market economy. what was your job? it all started 34 years ago. i was an adviser to the government of poland and then, when we already had a whole network installed. i began to interact on the economy with president gorbachev. he asked me for some advice. i was happy to act as an adviser in the autumn of 1991

. i have already joined president yeltsin's team. we worked hard. i tried to help myself. what does it mean to help some kind of financial health in russia, the difficult days of 902 and 93, but unfortunately, the us government is only effective. in this, i think that if you look at the history of this issue, it becomes clear that the hardliners of the us government , the so-called hardliners, they still looked at post-soviet russia, as an opponent, as an enemy, and even after gorbachev discovered these diplomatic doors established good diplomatic relations, and dissolved this

fact of the warsaw pact and the soviet union was already looking there in the direction of nato and now we see the new president of the russian federation even then and i remember at the beginning, when president yeltsin said. well, we just want to be an ordinary country. we want to cooperate with you. and i wanted to convey this idea further to the americans, moreover, to the american authorities, but the us authorities were hypocritical. arrogant they didn't want to interact. they just wanted america to be in control, and they weren't interested in helping russia at all , yeltsin's time it was a hard time for russia , the great instability of the soviet union is gone, it's a victory for democracy, freedom it's victory moral strength of our values. every american can be proud of this victory, despite the potential for instability and chaos - this

event, the collapse of the ussr, is clearly in our national interests. there was a huge hesitation in the workshop and i then made special recommendations on how to bring stability to the world after the ussr, how to reduce the pain that russia, the russians, and the government of european countries were undergoing. they studied it, but they remained uninterested in the fate of russia , i was talking about poland, the plan for the future was accepted, but for russia it was canceled and i generally believe that there has never been such a big severe crisis in the history of mankind, and the united states from

january 2, free prices will be introduced in russia, of course, the most difficult economic situation in which we find ourselves in a shortage of everything and everything cannot pass just like hotbeds of social tension. these days have become many cities. tomorrow we celebrate the new year, which may bring us some joys, but will definitely add new problems. we will face one of them on january 2nd. i i mean the liberalization of prices in stores , goods have already appeared at these new free prices. they take everything else you can take food and clothes gasoline. everyone wants to buy at least something for the holiday. everyone wants to buy something more expensive for the new year. no shops, comrade. here we have to meet the transfer. literally in a month i became

a personality although i never thought about how i should live? well, i knew that they would somehow live on us. they just made an experiment on our poor people. although we supported yeltsin, what were your fundamental proposals, which the west did not go for russia did not have to pay on old debts, because you understand the reserves then at that time they had to be assessed. i evaluated them, i recommended the creation of a special fund for the stabilization of the russian ruble then in the nineties and emergency funding was part of my plan for stabilizing russia, the same ideas for poland were adopted. the same ideas for russia said no to cancel. and what, it means we cancel this

word, the united states said because then the united states of america was responsible for this politics. and if the us says no, then the international monetary fund and other organizations. they also say no, because they are acting within the framework of the us decision at that time, but their idea was such a polar world. where the us was a rising power and the us should have benefited to the maximum from the collapse of the soviet union, roughly speaking, there was no counterweight for them then. i think it was a very serious mistake. they were very wrong, but they also liked it for the european political class. it was also tempting after the ussr left historical platform. the us thought well. we can u work under the control of

the governments of countries that do not suit us. i like we can drop the hodafi, we can drop the bashras. and then they spoke to themselves. the us has no competitors. that's the idea they had, i had another idea at that time. i wanted people to live a decent life, they should enjoy the advantages that new technologies give birth to. people everywhere not only in my country not only in the usa so that in any country people have access to new technologies to support. it was my interest, and i did not think about who is number one here in the world, who is number two, number three, for example, for me the most important thing was to distribute economic benefits around the world in order to achieve a joyful life, and in the usa those who were then, i think they support this policy now. they thought it was supposed to be a pax americano american world, the ultimate power of the us i

want to assure you, as i assured your president, that the west is not looking to take advantage of those outstanding changes that are taking place in the east. we spoke of the astonishing efforts of the peoples of eastern europe in the search for a free and democratic future. i told your president that i support dynamic processes. reforms carried out in the soviet union, we will work together to overcome barriers that hinder trade, investment and the free exchange of goods but you still think that the market economy is the only right way was then my role in 1992 1993, this is 2 years 2 years. i was a consultant. i

tried to stabilize the financial system of the new russia at that time, so that russia would receive western support from the west, in order to stabilize its currency, the currency in order to restore the economy of a country that had just experienced such stress, a group was created where well-known economists are represented as for the general principles of building an e- program, first of all, we do not have any great danes, nothing is holding us back. we want to get away from what used to be conservative inertial system to create a normal market economy is such a main principle, but i have never been asked about for example, about closed auctions, but no, i was in finance. we have a long way to go and we have made our choice to continue the reforms of democratic transformation, and especially now to resolutely

move along the path of market relations, reforming property relations and so on. i wanted the united states to assume its responsibility, proactive responsibility, support young russia , practically come up and help this country. and it was my idea a year after i started working with russia. i told gaidar, i tried, but everything i said was everything i advised, it did not help, and a year later. i told the gaidar. probably i need to somehow pack my bags, and then the new minister of finance. that is, boris fedorov appeared, as far as i remember, and he said to geoffrey, please don't leave, let 's try one more year, but i said. well, i'm not helping in any way whatever i tell you, you don't do it. he said no come on come on please try again for another year. well , that's why i stayed in 1993 in russia and at

the end of 1993. here 2 years have passed. i realized that i did not help. i resigned my powers, then the us government , represented by one of the officials, made such a statement. and now i remember something like that , it was too big a shock for russia and there was so little therapy for russia, i said, it's very strange. it's generally mean to say so, because the us government has no way to hold. therapy to heal the young economy new russia they did nothing to help russia at that moment. what impression did they make on you then? gorbachev and yeltsin, you know, he worked for president

gorbachev, but i really liked him. i know a lot of people didn't like him because he was a man of the world. i think that at that time the most important thing was world peace. he wanted the cold war to end, he believed in cooperation international cooperation. it was generally a difficult period in the history of the country, and, unfortunately, the west took advantage of what gorbachev did because he said, i found the military alliance i want to build again. i don't want us to have a military alliance and the west say we promise we won't find it to the east.

nato will not advance he stopped the war in afghanistan returned the exiles of andrei dmitrievich sakharov, together with president bush, buried the cold war in malta became the godfather of the united by germany we received publicity, and in the elections the right to delete from the list those who we did not like and yet the country exploded blood and hatred, when old people and children are not spared by injustice boundaries of interethnic hostility, social and economic injustice in a word. all your past. i still can't understand. all of this was not documented . many times it was said, to gorbachev

personally, that nato would not expand to the east. it wasn't even just one conversation that was repeated. as such a mantra now the west says no, but it was not written down, but no. much of this slyness was written down, but much was not included in official treaties. remember 1991, the very beginning, gorbachev returned from his historic trip to big seven and then all of a sudden the way and here is the end of gorbachev's period of power, and everything happened so quickly, then that nothing was recorded in the negotiations that were going on. it was a huge process in which and bush

and helmut kohl and gorbachev they were probably trying to make a more secure, cooperative demilitarized world, but as soon as the years of the soviet union ended . and this is december 1991, then the americans said. hey, that's it, now the power. we have the whole deck and everything that was said there before, but what the hell will we have our own new approach the us approach has already been called, then one polar world is a one-use world and all the us is the ruler of the world in our us documents, two competitors of the us are russia and china, two opponents. these are supposed opponents, but they are indicated as opponents with us.

in fact, this is a huge mistake. the united states should not look at russia and china as enemies , because the united states to me so that both russia and china they want to somehow influence the values ​​​​of the united states on the international political order, but as soon as you tell someone that you are my enemy, here, naturally, this someone becomes an enemy, and moreover, if there are two of them, then they begin to be friends with each other. here. look, russia is becoming closer and closer friends with china, interacting with china, and this is the action of the united states, which, on my part, is already erroneous. but if, uh, the united states does not constantly wage these wars, then what will be the economy, and the country and the country in general, it will be able to exist without it. yes the us economy it will it could flourish if we didn't have wars

because we have so many problems in the us that need to be addressed and to solve these problems. the economy can grow. we have a broken infrastructure. our life expectancy is shortening. in common we have a huge amount of mental illness mental illness in the country huge rates of high rates of poverty poverty, and we have a budget in the us that does not pay attention to this, because we are pouring trillions of dollars into wars to support the economy of war. this is not an economy that is in the service of the americans, if interests speak of a military economy, it is a number of companies that produce weapons. this is a series of companies that are profiting from the war in ukraine and we know, yes, this is the us military-industrial complex that is growing right now by

leaps and bounds, but the us economy - it should not be the economy of war war - this is, well, an unfriendly decision war - this is not a good solution for the growth of the state, but the war draws resources from the economy and it affects the budget for the us budget it affects the way the us behaves and it's a disaster for any economy, war is a waste money through the window, people will kill each other, foreign territories will be destroyed, and we see an increase in nuclear tension. and this is a real question. this is a real problem. this agreement is the largest spending cut in american history, more than two trillion dollars. we are returning to the budget a colossal amount that the federal government was going to set aside for senseless spending. the rise in the us

just a few days before the default that everyone was talking about. how long can america inflate this soap bubble? in general, the us debt that is, this is what the government keeps in debt, and in relation to its citizens, this is already more than 100%, uh, than all the possibilities of earning the usa and if we add interest to the us government debt, and the interest rate is 3.5-4%, then the percentage of you is somewhere around four percent of us gdp well, perhaps this debt, of course, must be serviced somehow, but this is not for long, because the us population is aging, because

health care is starting to eat more and more money and maintenance is becoming more and more difficult. a lot of this national debt has been recruited soldiers in afghanistan in iraq in syria and so on. and this means that these wars have introduced debt into debt and part of the policy of the united states is that rich people do not pay much taxes. and that means there is a possibility. e to get away from such tax imposition, but at the same time the us really does not want to continue to pay large pension songs does not want to support health care and so on. and this means that we are constantly faced with the problem that we in the united states spend very little per person, in general we will spend on cold steel on hot weapons for some social problems problems

of inequality. maybe, but we will not spend money on real problems. and this means that these problems will be. to worsen on the eve of the world economic forum in davos, the organizers for the seed released the study, the authors of the report made a grim and categorical conclusion. that the next decade will be a time of environmental and social upheaval? globalization is a reflection of the fact that we are much better able to solve common problems if we are connected europe and russia together with nordstream can achieve more than without nordstream trade relations should be international. they would support both russia and the us in the future. the end of globalization is a project of us geopolitics, it is

not an economic project, and there are differences . that is why globalization is perceived differently. that is, i know that the majority of the world is the majority of the people in the world. they want open economic systems in which there will be free trade and financial flows will come. along with technology flows from one side to the other to different countries, and this way tourism will build up, horizontal mobility of people will build up, and this is not about geopolitical problems and about a geopolitical race, so de-de -globalization, which we are talking about , is the project that jack sullivan proposed head e of the us department of homeland security in 2020. he wrote ah. this is before

byte even became president, which said that the us must resist de- globalization. think what would happen if america will relinquish its leadership role. can china fill this gap europeans? they also cannot replace america, given how concerned they are with maintaining their own union as one of the attributes. the exclusive role of the united states is that this country, to a greater extent than other developed democratic countries, wants to have power in all its forms. i read. it's an essay like an economist along with other experts and you said it's a terrible idea. i would not have missed it, i would not have put my signature on it, but what i want to say is that we we see us politics we see that us politics has been captured by these geopolitical strategies that do not think about the economy. they

only think about who has the longest budget who is the first who is the coolest they don't think about globalization in terms of economics. but when i think about the economy and about globalization. i understand that the global economy should serve people and support interaction between different countries. this is real globalization, not globalization as the only system to support america like this city on a hill, like the very first most leading country? better for the countries, er, the global economy or the national economy, after all, if today the global economy does not serve as the tool you are talking about. the global economy still needs to be better protected and supported, and why can i say this, because look at

russian diplomacy if russia looks at the usa , then russia will be very it will face huge toughness from the usa when russia looks at the eu today, turn to the eu in the same way, the frustration of the eu does not want and does not can now be nothing but serving nato and serving the interests of the united states. but if russia looks at the whole world in general. i don't think there is anything bad for russia in the global economy. because if russia cooperates better, if russia watches. but india in the direction of china to interact with them, if russia continues to act within the framework of the eurasian economic union, then russia

will only benefit from this russia and diplomatic and economically improved relations with all these unions countries. and that's great. i think it's great because that's what most of the world is. this is the main world. and what i would like to see next is that most of these countries say, let's stop this war. let's stop the expansion of nato, stop this idea in the bud, and the idea of ​​a unipolar world that one should be super dominant, and everyone else should obey, and then we will have a lot of polar world now social inequality is growing in the world, which you just said. what form of economy? could here to save. this situation. this situation can only save the world, in which we have common

goals, common goals, when we have an international financial system that will fold the interests of even poor countries, not only rich countries. i write about it in many of my books. i opened this question, how can we build a world economy in which we can achieve rapid economic development, how can rich countries take on additional tasks in order to reform uh, energy systems to achieve global security, how regions should and can interact, because the truth is that the reality of cooperation begins in the region. not on any plans or maps. well, yes, look, we see that there is russia, there is ukraine, they must have an economy that is super interconnected. we must depend on each other to love each other from the point of view of the economy already, and like neighboring countries, but this is how

it works, the real economy is not an economy on military flights, not an economy in which you need to produce as many weapons as possible then we can achieve growth, and then we will achieve a number of different goals together, that is, that all 93 member countries of the un adopt these new rules. those would be great new targets. now is the time to say the most important words. i will say this for may 34 years of deep work on the issues of russia, ukraine and most of the countries of this world. i have always believed that we can live in peace together, we can stop the wars, and we can solve our difficulties together for the benefit of all participants

, the world is constantly showing something. shows the difficulties. i am constantly faced with opposition from the us government's own government but i keep saying it. we can live together. we can work together. we can keep the peace , make peace so that we live in security, so that we live with dignity. only through diplomacy was it the right time. space reconnaissance marks a major construction in square 48. i think they are afraid that nadezhda has failed, how would you react to

your intelligence officer if he began to testify from you , just a little. some insignificant details of the work of your institute, but memory is the same thing that cannot be said without you. i felt very sad here. does it seem to me that one of them is playing a double game. i owe too much to russia once you have to pay off in the film the fate of the resident tomorrow on first well , how are you doing? i don’t know, if they believe, everything will be very good. pay the cards pay

up to twenty-five percent. open for free in the app. fantastic shopping even during discounts and sales , any purchase for 10 months and cashback up to 10% just one card for all purchases not something to throw away, how are your lessons? waiting there-there-there-there-there-there, tu-tu-tum. stop paying ozon with a cashback card up to 25%

open for free in the ozon application to banks, through the fields, a blue tractor is coming to us. will it ever end no, traffic. who on video endless you can watch videos endlessly. just choose a dragon in beeline tariffs on your side. what can the application do? tinkoff application kino 1tv presents today received an order from

moscow within two weeks. we have to prepare to carry out the assault. koenigsberg, meet. this is march lange along with march. go to königsberg. there you can get in touch with our group. go through never worked with women. the other day an officer arrived and brought a new encryption scheme for our communications on each frequency, mutually exclusive, we believe that all this confusion was created by art. they are very afraid of sabotage work. it is necessary to know where the germans ski radio is, but most importantly, the flask briefcase, for the sake of one person. we cannot compromise the whole task.

six teenagers committed suicide for what? you touch turns into a marriage storm caught or not?

cinema one tv presents vertinsky i must say with deep pride and happiness that yes, a lot of people don't like what i say the mainstream media in the us don't like me, but my university supports me very much. he supports what i say, he supports my academic work and my willingness to teach, and i think that yes, and deserved some certain respect in that i tried for many years to understand all this, what is going on with us. yes? a lot of people don't want to listen to me, but still a lot of people

around the world are interested. many people say to me, thank you very much for what you say to this familiar chessboard. the truth she constantly thumped the child by itself her roommate is aggressive daughter something with you. and before that, she lived with them. yes, you don’t drink and you’re so businesslike, why was your daughter taken away from you? well, they drank a man rushed at my district police officer. i am ready with any means to protect my children of power.

good afternoon. this is how you chase attractively for some reason, and you will lose the most valuable thing while running from one zhenya to another. lost her daughter. but he wants to return.