[000:00:00;00] tanker yevgeny okulov spoke about the courage of our military in the zone of our own in the ministry of defense. working in tandem with another crew, he destroyed g3 enemy combat vehicles that tried to thwart the assault, ukrainian positions, the enemy infantry made losses and retreated was awarded a medal for courage, squad leader alexander kibalnikov. together with an officer under fire, he managed to throw a burning anti-tank missile out of the dugout. how he saved the lives of his colleagues, helped some of his wounded to a safe place major roman mukhametzyanov organized a breakthrough of defense the enemy lost tanks and infantry fighting vehicles in another battle. found a broken group of saboteurs ensure the safe passage of our equipment. the united states announced a new 41st package of military assistance to ukraine according to a statement from the pentagon , the zelensky regime will receive almost 60 armored vehicles , strikers and armored vehicles, stinger anti-tank jebelins, as well as hummers missiles and shells for

air defense systems. in total, for a total of $ 500 million, at first the war , the operation in ukraine, washington provided kibu military aid worth $40.5 billion. today eid al-adha, one of the main holidays of muslims in russia 250 years ago, a decree was signed on the tolerance of religious documents for the first time officially gave believers the right to practice islam lifted the ban on the construction of a mosque and the organization of islamic communities. as expected today for eid prayer. about 300,000 people will come to moscow. in the moscow region, about 200,000 eid al-adha is the culmination. hajj pilgrimages to sacred places this year , mecca and medina were visited by about 2.5 million, there are 2.5 times more believers than a year earlier, when quid restrictions were still in effect

this minute. see you. yes , children come on an excursion to the victory museum to the exposition of the feat of the people, we tell these children, and with the use of all the possibilities, the so-called gadgets. yes, but a screen on which there is a cinema and a museum. everything is connected there. they are immersed in information and emotion and come out after this exposition, which begins with the brest fortress and ends with the storming of the sheet. yes, it turns out quite different. that's exactly what it is what we sometimes cannot tell them in the family can be told in this language already in their language. they are now on the screen. there right exposure can expand the screen to see. what was there, what was there next and touch everything with your own hands, see how

the ppsh assault rifle was assembled and even sing a song of the war years, uh, to the soldiers of the great patriotic war, because they have this skill to sing in karaoke. but just try, only soldiers of the great patriotic war will look at you now. try to sing them the dark night. that's when they start emotionally gradually, but to enter into this information and ask further question here for the sake of such questions we try and work. this is a podcast of paws and a podcast of the creative industry on channel one, our guest is people's artist of the russian federation igor nikolaevich golnikov. if you have not been, uh, at the museum of victory have not yet seen the exposition of the feat of the people, in fact you have seen this is the wrong word in relation to this exposition, because you get inside this life from the moment when the beginning of the great patriotic war. and you're in the apartment with your family, and then you go through

you go through all the stages. and in general, you go to berlin with the reds. this is this this is very difficult to write. that's how this idea came about to do just that , generally speaking to the museum in different ways. it is possible to arrange generally speaking an exposition. why exactly did it happen that the director of the museum of victory , my friend, suggested that i approach the creation of the exposition a little differently than they did all this before and invited me again. dmitry pushtarenko a wonderful artist from st. petersburg, but in order to unite our series and the co-creation of these three people, and at the same time a huge team of artists and directors worked, and it was necessary to technically come up with all this to organize. but the co-creation of these three people turned into this exposition, by the way, not only this one, but there is still an exposition there. the battle for moscow about which we continued. and as for how this impact on people,

because we have set ourselves a wider task than just the victory of the soviet soldier soldier red militia armies a. the victory of the entire soviet people is the most important idea, then in that war the great soviet people won in the rear. and yes to them the partizans and a how the industry worked, how the state defense committee worked, how the evacuation was created uniquely, and the enterprises of the factories of the western part of the soviet union b to the east, a. and that’s it, uh, that’s what it says about itself, like the feat of the soviet people in this exposition here, here ’s a subtle moment that can be bent, that is, with a frontal one that’s so instructive, yes moralizing, and you have just such a great strong skill to joke and make it easy and somehow natively build it in there, some kind of lightness or it will blur the focus on the seriousness of the topic. do you joke

at all, it happens to be pure to say that in this case, where are the jokes addressed, what can they be used for? well, you can improvise any joke - this is a kind of improvisation based on a certain prescription. here we have, for example, with you now a night program. yes, we talk chair at night. we are not very comfortable, they make you and me sit up straight. probably this is correct. and if you and i dreamed up and the cameras would fly upstairs. we could talk like this when we move on to outer space, but i wanted igor stanislavovich to find a way to fall apart a little in his chair. and can i then finish your question here, uh, between a joke and a movie, here is the genre of military comedy. uh-huh this is what a generally known genre is, but so far all films are about the war. they are very serious. there isn't. maxim perepelitsa is not there. e means some very ironic stories some. well, that is, here is the chronicle of a dive

bomber. remember it was a wonderful movie, but i repeat. this movie began to be shot already then, more or less at the end of the war, and this was also a certain correct year of order. it was necessary to exhale a little bit to raise his head, yes, and the chin over this war. i think that this period will come with us now after some time, it’s just that it’s kind of hard now. we currently have 41, but in the future it is necessary and necessary to do this, but why? who still hasn't been able to, as they say, take a swing at vasily terkin? but this is the greatest work about the war and with great humor, probably, it is so hard for us now to perceive, and the situation, so that we begin to treat it at least a little with humor. i have a hard time imagining it. until now , i would have been running a ban program, so what i would do now as part of my program. and i hmm must be modern to respond to the request of society. you could

do a lot. it seems to me that he does not consider such a program. yes, and especially serious ones, especially tough with this intonation, talk to spectator. i think that it is necessary now, and the one who finds the strength for himself and does this will be rewarded by us with our attention, probably worth it and necessary. well, the type of attempts that are now being made in this genre to work. it's sorry below plus it doesn't work. that is, i don't know it's rarely given to me to look, would you like to ask a direct question, would you like to speak with the viewer? likewise, good evening. right now, in your current position , the questions are interesting, now konstantin lvovich is also looking up. yes konstantin lvovich if there is a will from above and you say or suslavich, let's go to the cinema

yes, cinema in the afternoon, and in the evening, please, be kind here and open your hands in front of the viewer, but then we will all need to work seriously together to do this adequately and correctly the application was accepted by the daughter. and a moment about humour. still, i can’t ask, but humor is also a weapon. very powerful , yes. of course, when it goes through the feat of the people, there are keys, this weapon is the dependence of the people when you walk on it. yes, there is, uh, exposition, separate, dedicated to the ukrainians. for example she is beautifully absolutely amazingly done. but it's a weapon until i see it being drawn at all. e from so to speak from the scabbard sense yes, that's why it's so too. uh, a sharp surgical instrument with no one to control them. someone's hands. it should be a tool. here you just need to think hard about how, in this case, to use this weapon and i will repeat. whose hands

should it be, but at the same time, here is our tsiolkovsky festival, which we have been doing for 4 years in kaluga, this is our attempt to see. this is what i was trying to do now 2 minutes ago again and in this outer space to see some of my fantasy. remember that we are the great soviet union who launched the first satellite. yes, this gagarin or alekseevich gagarin next year, he will be 90 years old. yes, he was the first cosmonaut on earth. and now we are collecting films for this festival. uh, different themes. naturally, first of all , space and various genres, and the viewer comes to the tsiolkovsky museum in kaluga and looks excitedly with great interest at different world cinema, but there is space, to be honest, for these few days every year from april 16 in kaluga i exhale, and from what we say, i have a feeling that now is the very moment when you need

to take our man . so its so a little shake it's good to say. well, you remember who your ancestors are, what is great. your country. ah, so something you can be proud of. do you remember? what are you proud of? that's just to our man should not be treated like that. so yes , alexander sergeevich yes, here he is about it said, two feelings, wonderfully close. in them, love for our father's coffins finds food in our hearts. love for the native, the ashes on them immortalized from the ages by the will of god , the man himself, the guarantee of his greatness is on his own. we must stand firmly on our feet and not forget about our ancestors and our gro. which are still one way or another in the ground. she does not forget to influence us in one way or another. remember this . here is a film of learning, the fruits of which it was made

2 years ago about what happened a in the pushkinsky mikhailovsky reserve during wars during the occupation, just m-m says about this, who are we russian people. what kind of independence we have when we can’t even imagine not reading pushkin yes , there is a character there, says it’s enough that we are proud of him, no, it still lives on us, and we cannot give it to the enemy. not under any circumstances, under any circumstances. this is what a modern russian person needs on their own. yes, i remembered just the fruits of scholarship and related to this issue. e arises after the release of each film related to the war arises discussion. yes, it wasn’t like that, was it at all, is it necessary to show it like that? isn't it necessary to show it like that and so on, a lot of criticism arises, because everyone has their own opinion on this matter. how do you feel about critics? how can you tell? who criticizes why? yes, and what

goals are set at the same time, if the criticism is interesting, i need it so that i do not make similar mistakes with the next picture. yes, i will accept this criticism. and if the criticism is agul, just to fuck up your business, then i just i don’t read, i don’t watch, since this doesn’t happen with our paintings. and if there is criticism, and you have the wrong tank ugolnikov. and yes or vice versa it could not be like that, and we say that yes it was like that. it's just that we show and demonstrate to you, and the facts that are unusual for you, and some of the stories that i won't be able to film with him. well, i just don't have the strength of the soul. well, now, for example, there is. do not even shoot khatyn, this is an old story. i had multiple scripts every time i read them. i tell myself i can't

do it. i can’t, but i should, because it’s khatyn, and then it wasn’t the germans who destroyed it, but with particular cruelty it was those same people, the descendants, who are now doing all this hell in western ukraine, you have to think. that's how much you have the strength, and the ability to make such a movie, and criticism, well , of course there should be, but at the same time, that's, well, why criticize with colleagues. we always talk about it, that we can't lose over trust, but at the same time. well, this is our responsibility. and if the movie called the battle for sevastopol, then the viewer should see the battle for sevastopol is nothing else. if the film is called to save leningrad , then i have to look, and the fate of the people who tried to save leningrad, they escape on a barge from this city. well, and so on. it is this responsibility that lies before us that

gives us the opportunity and the need for criticism to treat pseudo-documentaries calmly. this is also a whole trend. it is now called fake. yes, but it's a whole trend. and how do you feel about pseudo-documentary when let's say you can attribute some facts. it works on purpose. eh, the creator himself gives it a new color. but it does read. uh, a large audience, like uh, real something into what it is immersed, what really happened, i don’t belong to pseudo-documentary in any way, and having made more than 30 documentary films in my life , i also understand. what a responsibility we face, even when we want to make the audience a little more interested in something like that. still think of what it would be possible to believe and look like it's credible. but no, as for the theme of the great patriotic war, there are some