what happened to eat the order of the emperor is a violation? exactly a violation why are you holding a sword, how do women hold it? after all, the empress ordered all the women of babsky to go. so why do we have women not women? we'll help you change. katerina romanovna alexander ivanovich ordered the princess to be delivered to him. yes, i would gladly give her to him. and

so you understand, the honor of the uniform is the honor of the regiment. another moment i myself was glad i was embarrassed to thank. your majesty

the flag is still on our side. it's impossible your majesty kronstadt for catherine's in this situation, it would be expedient if you yourself disband the garrison to quarters, please everyone leave me alone. it is impossible

in the kazan cathedral, the service is going on in the palace has begun. we won. you win? thank you very much for taking the time now,

of course. you are a very busy person. and probably even busier than usual, so we especially appreciate your willingness to give this interview. i'm looking at a statement from the washington statement by president biden's secretary of state oblinker, and they and their staff. they say that the united states were not involved in any way with the ball that took place in moscow last week and moreover, that the united states does not interfere at all in the internal affairs of russia, that's what i was interested in with their logic, when something happens, what the united states does not like in ukraine, regardless of what russia specifically did, the position of the white house in the united states is very simple

. by this logic, if e nato had not constantly moved beyond the borders of russia, if sodium and, first of all, the united states a. they played a role in ukraine that does not play now, then, probably, the situation did not arise, which gave ah. but, if you like, a special role for wagner and which led, here to this mint, do you think that washington objectively gave impetus in one form or another to the events that took place against the week, as for the statements that sound, i would say, even a little, obsessively that the united states has nothing to do with it. we hear them, of course, but in addition to what is said into the microphone. we have information on how

the united states ensures that all of its bureaucracy responds. in particular. there is reason to believe the information that the state department, and as soon as it began, and perhaps even the day before, urgently instructed all of its foreign missions not to comment on this situation in any way so that someone could tie it to action united states and uh, at the same time, the instructions went and uh, according to our data, which i am inclined to believe, they went to kiev so that the ukrainians would not use this situation to organize sabotage on russian territory and other provocations in the near future. i will repeat. again. i can't guarantee 100%, but this is very reliable information and it looks like the truth. and yes, you mentioned that there were statements that the united states

did not interfere in the internal affairs of russia, does not plan regime change in russia, you said, i think strategic communications coordinator. er, mr kirby but knowing the track record of the united states for regime change. well, such a statement, of course, sounds, but i would say somewhat artificial against the background of all the rest , e strange territory where they are when the united states is like that. they did not say, but then. knowing how, until recently , several years ago , american foundations were working here in our country, don't go to the organizations. what were they doing? how they courted all sorts of things and, uh, trained opposition. well, in general, i think there is no need to intrude into this topic in detail. this is sheer deceit. concerning? your main question, it belongs to the category

that i would describe as the cancellation culture americans like to cancel. yes, and the west as a whole loves from me everything that does not meet their interests, and in this case this is another example of how they cancel the history of modern history, and specifically those periods that, in general, gave rise to a conflict or crisis. you mentioned nato expansion unconditionally. it's uh process that well in in general, he already began to sow seeds, and which gave such ugly seedlings. e, but if we take the history that is closer to us after the coup d'état. if there hadn’t been a coup d’etat, then a lot of things would not have happened, the president said more than once that we

didn’t have any plans to support any movements in crimea in favor of reunification with russia under legitimately elected presidents, but when the coup d’état took place when uh hmm mourned by the americans of the leader of the opposition, breaking his commitment signed the day before with yanukovych, namely, to resolve the crisis peacefully, to hold early elections, when they were the first thing they did on the day of the coups that they announced their plans. cancel the status of the russian language. dmitry yarosh demanded that russians be known from crimea, militants of the friendship train were sent there, the so-called e wanted to storm the building of the supreme council of crimea and all this, of course, sent a very powerful signal, including our society, which has always had special feelings towards others slavic peoples, especially

ukrainian belarusian can continue the destroyed agreement, despite the guarantees of france, germany and poland in february 2014. and no one there even lifted a finger to force the opposition and fulfill the obligations signed the night before, and then the minsk agreements. fine. everyone knows, which also turned out to be simply thwarted, but everything happened much more dramatically, because the signatories of these minsk agreements, except for putin, admitted that they were never going to fulfill them at all, but it took time, to e pump up ukraine with weapons against russia, that's all. uh, so to speak, the surrender was openly publicly declared. well, if only if they were, if they were carried out, there would be no need for a special military operation. this is very

well known, hence the statement that everything that is happening now. this is russia's fault because it started, as they say, not provoked by aggression, but this is an attempt to relieve itself of the responsibility to shift, as they say, from a sick head to a healthy one and everything is fine. it is clear what is at stake and what unscrupulous methods are used by western propaganda. this expression was mentioned by the american administration as unprovoked aggression, which is apparently very important for the version of events that the administration of the bike is promoting. but when you look at what the administration should have known and personally president biden should have known, and the question arises about the consequences of nato expansion. why is the administration

behaving this way? i sergeevich looked attentively at those telegrams that were sent by the ambassador to the williambers, and his head of the state department. i said to find telegrams not from secret sources, but from the book of memoirs of the ebillanders, and he quotes these telegrams and these telegrams , as i would say, not only specific, but also dramatic. in the one that predicted the most serious consequences of nato expansion , the question involuntarily arises that this person is not marginal. it was a man absolutely inside the system. this was a man with whom everyone was pleased with him after his role in moscow made the castle secretary of political affairs, then the first foreign secretary. now he is the director of the cia had all these warnings. why were they ignored?

why does the administration of the biden most of the congress behave the way they do, well, bilbert behaves exactly the same way as they are being led here, now that he has returned from free bread to public service, he is acting in exactly the opposite direction compared to his estimates. eh, that period. e, you know, we have heard and seen what e and e are doing, other members of the north atlantic alliance are saying with the americans there are approved a year ago in madrid on the lieutenant himself of the new doctrines, where e china was proclaimed a strategic adversary, a strategic challenge to russia, an immediate e, threat of today. and apparently, but the americans. rather, i said, judging by everything, but i rely on the assessments of many of my friends, who are very closely following the evolution

of the american position, and in general, the actions of the collective west and. uh, the logic that they see in the actions of the americans, because, of course, there must be some kind of logic with the point of view of the people who approve the relevant courses and implement them is that now it is necessary to eliminate the slow rebel of russia who dared to go and that means, that's across, this is not only. about russia, this is the world order, first of all, it is first of all, if any other country would defend its national interests resolutely and firmly in this way. i'm sure that the west would take up arms against her and the expectation that this is a tactical, as they consider threats, but having, uh, long-term and, in general, existential consequences in the event of a russian victory. how do they like them? but everything is seen, it is not acceptable,

therefore, hence the spells about the need, but to inflict a strategic defeat on russia on the battlefield and beyond. here my colleagues add this, among other things, it is important and as a lesson for the people's republic of china here. if we take what is happening in this perspective, then, in my opinion, e understands the logic of the west, which, in general, does not particularly hide it. they say on every corner that their task is to preserve the world order based on rules. what rules can endlessly translate examples when, depending on what kind of situation suits the united states, they can support one list of rules, someone sent it, never sends it, but we gave examples that, let's say, no referendum is needed in kosovo, they simply proclaimed independence and that's it, but in the crimea there was a referendum. this means nothing in kosovo, but the principle

of self-determination of peoples prevails, while in crimea , territorial integrity is completely ignored. at the same time, the fact that the un has a provision that must be respected the territorial integrity of all states whose governments represent all the people living in a given territory. well, uh, what kind of government is in kiev. over the past 8 years, it has represented the interests of crimea, donbass and the southeast of ukraine, so i have here, in general, there are no such big big doubts that this is logic. she sits deep. these rules of logic, the hegemon, are always right. here is the basic rule. oh well, here she periodically breaks through according to freud and statements. remember barrel even barrel who, uh, is considered the head of european diplomacy. in fact, it does the work of serving american interests in europe. the european union became completely obedient to washington under him. but remember, as he

said, europe is a wonderful flowering garden. and around us is the jungle. well, i hope he didn't mean the united states, since the united states is not europe after all, but no one dares to make sense of that. we are given a world order based on rules - this is when we decide what kind of globalization system exists in the world, and what will be the service mechanisms this globalization? how are trade disputes resolved? but of course, after the west suddenly trampled on all its principles, which it had drummed into the rest of the world for many decades. freedom of the market, fair , conscientious competition, the presumption of innocence, and the inviolability of property, and much more overnight, when it became necessary for them, uh, to punish the russian federation for everything. it was weaponized and our spokesman. let's say that

the international monetary fund aleksein, the other day, uh, spoke publicly on this topic in washington at the meetings of this international fund a and e. it provoked a very deep thought process anyway. eh, most countries. and what if the americans don't like our behavior tomorrow? well, what i just said, there is no doubt that there will be no less cruel answer , but this is a healthy process, because it deprives of illusions and forces every self-respecting state to be a state that wants to live on the basis of its traditions and with respect for its history ancestors and based on their national interests. of course, it will now follow, in general, our example, which we are setting, seeking sovereignty

in key areas on which the life of the state depends. this does not mean that the author of the president spoke about this many times, we opened this way to cooperation, but as far as our western former partners are concerned. we can't rely on agreements with them, including agreements that were legally binding, so here, yes, it's such a struggle of worlds. here in this struggle of the worlds the day of the mutiny according to the approval of, uh, the white house of the american white house and the state department. we have already said that they took a position of non- interference and allegedly communicated this position to the russian leadership at many different levels. if this is true. why did they behave like this? er, did that reassure you in some way or was it a tactical maneuver? well, you know, of course,

there's a lot to talk about, uh, on the topic of causes. eh, here is such an accentuated position, publicly denounced positions for the entire globe, so to speak. e. well, probably i agree with those experts who see fears for the fate of nuclear weapons as one of the reasons. this is always, uh, probably, a cause for concern for the nuclear powers in situations, when something happens, uh, alarming, and secondly, uh, i think again, i will not say anything, but uh too americans are actively promoting this thesis that they have nothing to do with it. they don't belong here. and by the way, well, the europeans also didn’t say what they had to do with it, but the europeans are much more, i would say hmm uh, specifically

expressed their interests in this particular situation. well, for example, e. hmm barrel, said that the main conclusion that he draws from what happened is, uh, confirmation of the need to continue to arm ukraine, they say. here some crack appeared, therefore. let's squeeze the macron said that what happened m-m emphasized the fragility and weakness of both russia and the russian army. therefore, it is right that we have taken such a course to support ukraine. here, too, slips. it's the same logic that i used. uh, they said it at the most the first minutes of what happened, and then there was no such statement, but it was reported that the european union held a special meeting to consider this situation. well, it's

hard for me to judge. uh, what are their reasons, but my impression is, as in the case of the one we discussed in the previous question. e temu and they are obsessed with the desire to prevent the formation of a democratic world order, a multi- polar world order and cling to any opportunity to defend their hegemony and sees in ukraine, of course, first of all, uh, the spawn prevention tool. uh, lots of polar world. in this case, preventing the strengthening of the russian federation, it is clear that these calculations are doomed to failure. i don't doubt it at all. but the fact that adults are serious, like division politics and that kind. and ideas, er, of course, cause anxiety over the fate of european civilization

, western civilization as a whole. svetlana tikhanovskaya, the leader of the anti-lukashenko protests, once again remembered the political arena, we know where the cause of our problems sits, she in the palace of independence and our fugitives fussed. true, a false start has occurred, they are trying to demonstrate to their curators that they have at least some results, but quite a lot of money has already been invested in it - 250 million euros, because she went to tour around the countries to look. who will tell her now, what to say the cutlet queen , along with this character, his name is french, who regularly tells everyone his secret plans. not only says good development. also a super lover. it turned out that she worked as a spoiler. she scooped herself up. how much money and people he could, including former warriors, he doesn’t need, full-fledged power, she doesn’t need anything else. svetlana tikhanovskaya is any housewife

and an american. skye's dream of managing the states of the heir's doll, tutti tomorrow on the first and always on one tv.ru. wow , tell me, when you see the sale of ikea goods on yandex.market, buy a chair and kia callsby. for only 1999 rubles. the halva card opens the door. in the world of fantastic shopping, even during the period of discounts and sales , any purchases will become even more pleasant with installments for 10 months and cashback up to 10% halva just one card for all purchases enough already to run for a favorable rate will make your tariff more profitable, activate them in

the megafon application organ function, just against fibrosis recommended course two packs of help needed. discover russia with the russian hammer, we will play a journey of 200,000 draws , every second ticket wins, it is convenient to play. everywhere. buy tickets at any time in the mobile application and in stoloto's branded stores , we run to sunbathe, but don't forget to protect your

skin with summer discounts on sunscreens for the whole family. choose a solution for every day from vtb on wildberries that does not miss the most important moments from a free debit card. it is possible to make the house comfortable in one step without commission. to please your loved ones with convenient transfers throughout russia and to more than 10 countries of the world and receive not only emotions from meetings with friends, but also up to thirty percent cashback. do better every day. get a free debit card for life vtb crunchy icing line taste buds the third column is ready your

fresh croissants and cocoa to go, please. here you will find friendly service cozy cafe and quality fuel. you were good, like at home coupon 5.05.0 on wednesday, two twisters for the price of one in the kfc fortner app, only one capsule a day to protect the joints and spine for all cases, mom fix price is coming to us for everything is low. the price of choosing a car is difficult, who is suitable for the car is not suitable for the price, who fits? the price does not fit the car, and when you find the perfect car with the perfect price, the account goes for a second loan for both a new one and a used car. he is so alone. wow goods market buy a mug. it's okay, i've

never had it before. so normal. i wake up earlier than before to rise above myself and find the strength to put off giving time to the most important thing, when sport is the norm of life. i don't care. find energy for the normative sport of the russian federation at the beginning there was a word, but today there are pictures emoji stickers. meet megafon 3:0 everything is fast. you are back in life, which is now available to all subscribers. go to megafon in washington what e you know, there are many complaints about russia better than me, one complaint that has been voiced more and more regularly lately. this is what russia is undermining strategic stability, how do you feel about it? answer? i probably

won't even try too hard. let's just list the facts, who e, when e began to destroy the entire system of international treaties that provided strategic stability, starting with the treaty against missile defense, with the treaty on intermediate-range missiles, the treaty on open skies, but of course, the treaty with strategic offensive arms. e in regard to the basic inalienable conditions that allowed his conclusion, which are set out in a direct or as equality indivisibility of security, the relationship of offensive and defensive strategic weapons. all. it was crossed out overnight, and every time. we didn't just talk. well, here you see the americans destroyed another document no, starting with the missile defense treaty, when, uh, putin's president is president. e

george w. bush discussed quite frankly. well, he even said this topic in a friendly way, and putin told him frankly, you understand? if you do this, but we will be forced to take action. e measures to ensure that e your trials were surmountable, otherwise it is impossible. i will simply be guilty before history, uh, and my country and the whole person - and he told him, well, we are not enemies opponents, so i promise you that this is not against you, because in north korea iran and what you will do, i will not perceive you as. directed against the interests of the united states, this is how it all turned out and how it all reached its finale in 2018, in my opinion, when the president told the federal assembly as part of his message. what ended here are the measures that were taken due to the rupture

of the american side of the anti-missile defense treaty. we took steps to ensure that this agreement. well somehow not to replace, but to compensate for his absence came to condoleezza rice, along with bill gates in the kremlin, putin received them, i was present at that meeting. he repeatedly returned to this topic and agreed on some. well, as for the technical measures that the americans could take at their planning and so on, and the bases in poland and romania, and the positional areas about but these technical measures that we took, we said, yes, let's, that's how it will be. everything is more or less calm, they did not do it, referring to the fact that the poles are against the treaty on intermediate-range missiles, even when the americans withdrew from it, putin said that we would observe a unilateral

moratorium on the deployment of ground-based missiles, which were prohibited under that treaty until this class of missiles will appear back among the americans , first of all, and on the territory of their allies; moreover, we then proposed, that they visit the kaliningrad region, where our iskanders were and are, which they suspected of carrying e-missiles, a prohibited range in exchange for a visit. they categorically refused to have any positional areas of poland in romania, therefore, all the ranting that the russians did not explain the deceit in any way cannot be trusted, and that's it. hi we say come see it was it hmm special

message was putin's fucking dick. e nato and above all in the united states, therefore you can talk for a long time. uh, yes, the open skies treaty is us. uh, they accused us of not letting anyone in somewhere. we did everything exclusively. it is exceptionally mirror image, because for our inspectors a huge territory and in some places in the european part and in the north of the american continent were closed for various reasons. basically, these were such technological logistical tricks that the americans resorted to, so i cannot accept the accusation that we destroyed the strategic stability. looking at the war in ukraine and more widely around ukraine about the world order, i have a question. and with whom is russia fighting? ay, the situation in ukraine and

the ground forces are ukrainian troops. armaments are more and more supplied by the west; means are provided by the west ; intelligence data, including those supplied directly by the west. and the planning of military operations is largely carried out by nato generals and the committee of chiefs of tabs in washington further, and the provision of ukrainian military operations attempts to weaken russia to receive some strategic materials or even simply dual-use materials. this is also done by the west. is it possible to say e in this situation that the west supports ukraine is the patron of ukraine or you need

to face the fact and said in fact russia is at war with nato with the collective west, that this is russia's confrontation with just this, as you said to the golden billions that he turned into himself into the order of the crusaders. well , of course, the west is russia's patron of ukraine to ukraine, the patron of the west in a different sense of the word a cartridge is a tool for introducing war against us, and you said everything correctly, this is not the first time we have been paying attention to this, and president putin said, assessing the situation that has developed on june 24, that we are confronted by the economic military and information machine of the entire west. so it is and you have listed examples, uh, that say that without the west this war. e would have been gone a long time ago.

the goals of a special military operation would have been achieved long ago , and again i quote the barrel. uh, maybe they don’t know about him today, he’s the chief diplomat head of the european foreign policy service, and specially the high representatives he called the foreign policy for security policy, which well, not quite recently. so frankly, even somewhere naively, he said, if someone wants to end the war, it’s very easy to just stop supplying weapons to ukraine and in a maximum of 2 weeks everything will end, but do we want him to continue such an end to the war, we have no right to allow in order for ukraine to be defeated, defeat must tolerate the russians, so this is also, in fact, a sincere confession. yes, and any military expert, who is now commenting a lot on this situation, will confirm that this is how

it is. the west is fighting against the russian federation and there are many other examples , including examples that relate to, uh, the status of foreigners on ukrainian territory on earth who are you, calling them mercenaries? there are suspicions that a number of countries, under the guise of mercenaries, are already sending their own there. e regular military instructors who certainly professional military they work in ukraine yes , not on the line of contact, apparently, but there is a huge number of specialist instructors. i remember how e. here is the maidan which began in 2013 and ended with a coup. uh, then already in the security service of ukraine there, in my opinion, the floor was occupied by representatives of the cia and other special services in the united states. so there are no doubts here, that's all.

what they are trying, uh, to cast as spells that nato is not at war against the russian federation, as stoltenberg likes do it that's all, well, funny and uh, sounds pathetic honestly, because adults. uh, they say, uh, well, an outright lie, so completely. caste to say, here but the more important it is to defend justice, the more so, the more so because uh, here we mentioned the goals of a special military operation that president putin and one of them set. uh, in addition to the de-melitarization, it consists in the denocification of ukraine, we are fighting in ukraine with the west and with nazism, which has already been actively revived in this country and which is actively cultivated by our western colleagues take at least their approach to negotiations. they repeat every time this topic

comes up that there is only one basis for negotiation - that is zelensky's 10 point formula . here was a meeting in copenhagen, which, uh, took place , it seems so secretly, but the information, oh, which leaked and we are now in our colleagues, uh, who were represented there , asked to tell us what the west wanted there to do together with the ukrainians by inviting the leading countries of the world majority there, but zelensky’s formula is the only basis is the position of the west zelensky himself , his entire administration declares that it cannot be any other basis. well , if you remove, uh, all sorts of vignettes, such as environmental safety, food security, nuclear security, or, uh, from

the point of view. here is the main point. it lies in the fact that russia is leaving all territories, e.g., as of 1991, russia the russian leadership is given to some special tribunal there, or the already existing russia pays reparations. e on the basis of the bill that will be presented to her and after that a peace treaty is concluded. ah and uh, at the same time, the west says that this is the only thing that can and can be a way out of this situation, ukraine this is emphasized especially by the barrels and stoltenberg urus hive von der lein, other western politicians ukraine in this war defends european and in general western civilizational values the ukrainian regime is a nazi regime, no one doubts they will even assert themselves and your audience listeners,

but by examples, because they are well known to a and b that this regime is russian, and due to the ban on the russian language everywhere and everywhere and attempts even physical violence against those who dare to break the law that you can only speak ukrainian. this means that europe associates itself with racism with russophobia with nazism, because it claims that it is the kiev regime. he professes european values, and if so then, especially since we have no other choice. how to prevent another revival of nazism right on our borders. if i correctly understood zelensky’s position, that’s all . those conditions that you mentioned are not even conditions for concluding an agreement, this is a condition for starting negotiations. that is, if i

understood his position correctly, then this means that russia should fully capitalize. but after that it will already be possible to talk to, with whom i said so, that in the list preconditions include leaving the frontiers of the ninety-first year of the last century before the start of negotiations, and then the prosecution of reparations and then sit down at the table. you know some serious power that could have such conditions. accept without it being completely crushed on the battlefield. well, uh, i have such precedents in history, but there are powers that are considered by everyone to be serious powers that support this logic. i mean all those who put on zelensk and put e. well, by in fact, all his reputation, his political future, because crawl away already

from this absolutely dead-end position. the west will not be able to without losing face. well, they know how to really lose face. so the public is served as if they bought it. ah, let me tell you a little secret, i got a call yesterday from the embassy in moscow and asked my opinion about the events. and how they can influence russian diplomacy and obviously. uh , was there hope, or at least an interest in opportunities, that russia would understand? to what extent the continuation of the war on ukraine is dangerous. what are the internal consequences of this and will there be and after the failures quiet will there be some change in russia's approach to the crisis in ukraine and will uh, russia is ready to take, if you want a more flexible position, how

would you respond well we president putin has already answered this. over the past few times, he has made detailed assessments of the current situation, emphasizing it in particular. eh, overcoming what? we did not in the least attempt to mutiny with the aims of a special military operation and did not have lost any ground on the battlefield and there is no sign that russia may reconsider its approaches, given what we are just talking about, given. uh, the deliberate creation by the west of direct threats to our security, the pumping of ukraine with deadly weapons, which are becoming more and more long-range considering, well, it’s just oppression and discrimination

, even with the destruction of everything russian in ukraine, the goal has been declared, including in relation to people who, in relation to the language culture, yes , and the people themselves, whose ancestors have been there for centuries lived, who equipped these territories , created cities there, to whom monuments stood there for many, many years. now these monuments are being demolished and statues of bandera shukhevych and other accomplices of the nazis are being erected in their place . so that i can give an assessment. are there any chances for a more flexible position of russia as they were enemies, but looking. eh, what they mean flexibility, if regarding this topic of surrender, as a condition for concluding peace according to zelensky, then

there is no need to talk about some kind of flexibility, if they have something else in mind, uh, if they are like now comments were made in germany in france, uh, some hopes are associated with various peacekeeping missions. and, uh, the brazilian president put forward his ideas and the african group, the arab group, now the pope is going to direct from his side, like to us and to kiev well, we are on this subject, we have repeatedly they said that we never refused to negotiate. the president said this a year ago. but those who refuse to negotiate, and this is the whole west and ukraine should understand that the longer they delay with a peaceful settlement, the harder it will be to negotiate, and uh. we have always emphasized until recently, when they changed their position, that we are ready to consider any

proposals that are of a serious nature. those we have not seen is only well chatter by and large. that's what zelensky's plan is. now they want to convene. uh, some forum of the world without the participation of russia well, in copenhagen, they invited several countries, uh, of the third world, where we were not invited, but they tried to work on them. here in support of the green formula, i heard that well, the same unscrupulous tricks, but there were places to be. and when, in response to a sober objection about the realism of this zelensky’s plan, which means capitulation , how is everything right? they told him they say, and you don’t support him the whole plan. there we also have, let's say, points that are not about war, they are about food security in the world , energy security, nuclear

security. here let's you strange africa asia latin america each one fad. disassemble such a jesuit approach, that is, isolate. uh, what is not odious and what is in general such a banal truth is the need to strengthen food energy security to seek. sign here, and then we ourselves, well, you know, this is absolutely not clean. they said that they uh, in general and generally supports the planctorian alike. well , of course, yes, yes, yes. yes, of course, they would even say that they did. to supervise separately his position here. but about openness to their dialogue , you understand, there were no serious proposals, in general, from no one. i mean, west africans have made a request to be accepted. we immediately responded, and now the messenger of the pope. yes, we talked with

our brazilian friends, who were sent here from the representative of the president luga, but when for many months, then what is a macron. state threatening. i'm going here call putin repeatedly. but if you want to call you just call why is it announce the microphone. and if you are announcing a microphone, it means that the main one will show off in front of his voters to show some means . such a directly principled one and you will teach everyone about life. and the fact that the macron just recently said. uh, answering a question called. he is putin or she tells me there is no need to call him, if he wants i will pick up the phone. well , compare all the public statements of western figures about contacts with putin, this is simply unworthy of respect, if you're interested in a conversation, never the president of russia will refuse

such contact, and you would not refuse contact. e with your uh counterparts in western countries and every time when uh, well, it was there twice, in my opinion, over the past year and a half, when damn it, i asked for contact, i either answered his call, or here in bali we talked for twenty minutes on our feet in the fields for about 10 minutes, but there was no more appeal. there is an appeal on the line. jake saleleona, there are contacts, of course, uh for questions the functioning of our embassies there and the american one here, we are not so far successfully clearing up the blockages that obama began to create 3 weeks before the inauguration of trump , slamming the door, expelling dozens of our diplomats, e. five objects of property. and so on. in general, the beginning was laid it was then. e so that we

are ready for contacts contacts. well, as for how long russia can withstand. uh, that's what the american diplomats were talking about, apparently. uh, and this kind of goes along with their claims that they will support ukraine so much. how many will be required. they never differ on the question it will take, for what, if to complete the military campaign, as they completed in afghanistan or in iraq, this is one thing, if, uh, they want to bring this company to the destruction of the ukrainian army. well, this is probably a little different, that is , when they themselves smelled the smell of fried food in afghanistan in iraq, they simply blew their legs and that's it, and they are not interested in ukraine.

enough already to run for a favorable rate. mega force will make your tariff more profitable, activate them in the megafon application emphasize your beauty. be irresistible this summer, everything for makeup from your favorite brands is already waiting for you at wildberries so quickly booked, where to stay the halva card opens the door to the world of fantastic shopping, even during discounts and sales, any purchases will become even more pleasant with installments for 10 months and cashback up to 10 %. i really want to

buy my stock in pyaterochka in the amount of 300 rubles. register checks and win products and a car. don't get enough sleep it's a sound sleep addiction.

wow, tell me, when you see the sale of ikea products on yandex.market, buy an ikea fr grik mug. for only 59 rubles, i also want to relax. relax, book profitable hotels and apartments on ozon daily solution from vtb with a free debit card. please your loved ones with convenient transfers within russia and to more than 10 countries of the world and receive not only emotions from meetings with friends, but also up to 30% cashback. do better every day. get a free debit card for vtb life on your feet all day and my back gets tired and i do little work at work.

drives sports on a daily basis, but how to protect joints thanks to the special halogen form of the arteus triple helix promotes support, health, joints just one capsule per day to protect the joints and spine. suddenly the right one. video, and why bondarchuk could not, but did not answer, probably, mts was busy, you will return the numbers, the smart defender system will save you from unwanted calls and return the difference. come for money post office bank. estonian prime minister publicly accused russia of nato expansion but this

completely perverted logic exclusive recognition of one of those who stood behind the advancement of the american military machine directly to our borders, this will not end well for nat or for the european union ukrainian writer. igor tsar declared that the ukrainian flute is 150,000 years old. shepherds began to play in the orchestra 20,000 years ago. but it's, well, it's just ridiculous. tomorrow on the first and always on one tv.ru for the last time contacts with strange west who were not, which you would consider encouraging and could share with us. no, there were no such contacts. i'll give you an example. i think they have some sort of ban. for example, last year in september i attended the ministerial week

of the un general assembly session. as always , there were many requests for meetings. we are positively distracted by all these requests, and among those who requested such contact was the president. cyprus then president. cyprus, mr. anastasianis. we have known him for a long time. uh, and uh every time he used to work. uh, or rather, when he came to new york for this here is the general assembly at the beginning of the general assembly has always held meetings. uh, five permanent members with the president of cyprus from the general secretary were working out some further steps that could help the cypriot settlement move forward and push it out of the deep impasse where it is now, but we confirmed the meeting last september in new york with the president of cyprus then apologized to us. they said that the european union did not advise him to meet with me. i still

do not want to name the ministers. two more requests was from european ministers. then they also left somewhere, they left with a connection, so it seems to me that there is some kind of prohibition and a step to the left , a step to the right with respect to the ban. well, of course, sorry, i met several times and spoke on the phone with the minister of foreign affairs of hungary who took place in st. petersburg at the form of an economic forum before that, he came to visit and as co-chairman of the intergovernmental economic commission for negotiations with me. so here it is, yes. this is an exception about step left step right, and you were talking about this is also in the context of pressure on e , independent states, including india brazil probably china and about a peaceful settlement in ukraine but it seems to me

that there is another front of political struggle pressure on these and other countries include turkey and more cooperates with us unilateral sanctions and to consider as a rule no supply to russia, blocking the supply of russia even none. military equipment, but also any items uh, if you want a dual-use. and what in our world cannot be considered the subject of a double destination? well, here again, we are dealing with the rules that the west itself comes up with and which it does not explain to anyone, but when, for example, uh, we, our presidents of russia and belarus announced an agreement to organize the storage of a certain amount of tactical nuclear weapons in belarus and there unfolded e. aircraft that are capable of carrying nuclear weapons, and

what a fuss has risen irresponsibly, uh, completely aggressive steps that do not contribute to the normalization of the situation. and this is the rule they have. although we do not violate no international commitments includes a treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. and the americans themselves, together with nato partners, have been holding nuclear weapons for many decades, tactical nuclear bombs in five nato countries, moreover , within the framework of nato, there is a project called in a joint nuclear mission within the framework of this project, pilots from non-nuclear countries are trained in aircraft control and use aviation nuclear bombs, which, in general, is in strong conflict with the nonproliferation treaty, but also many. a this is according to their rules. this is possible because