it's next to them. and the youth that exists grew faster. but since this is not the situation, so you need to find a way out of this, probably, you need to pay attention to the periphery, probably, you need to pay attention to the salary of peripheral coaches, not like in moscow, but the periphery, basically all the stars come from the periphery, they are more efficient. probably, there are many points that work should pay attention to during this period. which young coaches are the most interesting for you now? who, in your opinion , is creative in your profession. well because of foreigners, i most of all, honestly like the personal in orenburg. i really like it. and yet such players.

tournament table interesting moves, there are tactical moves, he seems to me a good psychologist. of ours, but we have many worthy ones, for example, a collection of kazakhstan, an idea to work well, works well abroad, works well for russians , works from krasnodar in azerbaijan

maybe, and the crown reproduces the impression this season, the team that lokomotiv made it to the cup and dynamo last year and is now waiting spartak and kaleshin are a young coach. i i like it for a long time, it works well for him. at least there is some zest, then he is very like that. uh, you know, how the caustic thoughtful himself played football. okay, the whole family in football he's promising training. at least. now he's an advance right? well

of course, well, such a cup success. uh, it's a big big big deal. his father, i played with him perfectly, the football player was the most beautiful. well, he has football, you know, how his football blood is his own football blood. each round arrives with errors and then these errors are recognized, as recently as in the game spartacus what happens to the judges? i understand that this is a question. i'll tell you honestly. i don't understand anything. uh, in appointing a penalty, i immediately say the main mistakes. you, as usual

, emphasize those inside the penalty area, i don’t understand anything. why they give a penalty i used to understand if a player obviously enters a dangerous position and a rude reception is against him. that penalty now they seek out such situations to the cook that the ball is generally on the other side here is a small collision, and they give one centimeter. i do not understand anything one thing, they have to make the judges look at the world championship, which was like, wait. yes, wait, wait, we are now they

go to see how many 2-3 minutes it takes. our players how many times fall lying around and waiting for an ambulance? how many times per match do you take approximately. estimate the statistics, interesting statistics, and then the doctor will come up and say something and go and play. here i touched on the intensity it helps the intensity. yes, of course, no , of course, no there are two or three minutes, there and these minutes. pause again tempo decreases pause again the pace players are already wallowing in every

clash. but, probably, the judge should warn the first time the second time, maybe give a yellow card. or you can remove an injury for, uh, a provocation there, then we will increase the intensity and we will walk less. eh, more responsible people should be prepared for this clara, which if we also understood that there is a 100% penalty, then 100%. what recommendations do they always refer to the recommendations of fifa but proceed from their situation. let's have a penalty like that so that everyone can see that it wasn’t, it wasn’t , it means it’s not necessary. bet money, two

days ago we opened again the tournament, which will be held by locoball, which we organized in 2007. 500 teams participating in it opened this tournament beyond mordovia was a tournament. they made my name. me too. there you need to greet the guys as a finalist, there are gifts and so on. by the way, there are amazing conditions in mordovia in saransk in order to hold tournaments in the winter. stadium

look how much football loves us, our ideas were the idea is to show football on the periphery, like it is, whether it develops or not. it seems to me that we succeeded and this father built it. orphanage from his farm orphanage children's home in this orphanage, the children

play football. guys who have some kind of flaws and so on, but he inoculates them with this. he loves football himself. so he stopped the form sergey ovchinnikov do you have any more gloves now? grants won , organized their own tournaments, which he is already running, probably the third fourth or fifth year. all the small ones from there small

areas from small villages are orphanages that also play football. i also help them, so i will answer a lot of trouble. a lot recently. your peer. it comes out by itself. yes led the crystal palace english premiere club. when you found out, you thought, but what? well, i'm worse, but i think that i'm no worse. you see, no one offers to lead. that is , you are willing to learn good good situations will be. if you're wondering, why not? uh-huh , a lot of psychology. here are the good things said. uh, just a pm he says, here are the russian players. they greatly underestimate themselves with such qualities, they

worry all the time. but, probably, it is, probably, he speaks correctly, probably, in childhood, the coach does not inspire e in terms of. confidence to young children that you are the best you are the best you are today. you can do anything. you can become a world champion. you can become, it seems to me, this is exactly what our russian players lack. our podcast is called football not hockey, we compare two sports that are very popular in our country. popular and well, both your time and mine. they also played football in the summer or then hockey, now the most popular football i wanted to say, yes, and you can’t get to hockey from the other side. if you look at hockey, it has its advantages

: they let you in from the street from where you want to the stands, so full? i'm sick now. now i'm rooting for ak bars biledina. he is my nice neighbor. yes, i compare two sports. why is football not hockey? what are the benefits of football? there are no such advantages. e and football football is a big game and hockey is a big game a lot combinations many interactions many salary. they are somewhat similar. these are two sports. they are probably related from a psychological point of view. also, of course, two sports. and the most popular and absolutely agree, so it is what distracts us and helps us in life. thank you very much for your time. thank you hello

this is a must-read podcast aglaya na batnikova director writer. today we are discussing dostoevsky's novel the idiot with director vladimir khotinenko and actress ekaterina guseva, they say that people share for those who like tea coffee with a dog or a cat and fat dostoevsky and here i am , for example, a man of dostoevsky you probably vladimir ivanovich is also a man of dostoevsky yes, well, you know, you have to take the liberty of saying this. i'm a dostoevsky man. but in a certain sense it's true, but i absolutely can't say that i'm more like tolstoy than a man who didn't even really like dostoevsky and nabokov. i already feel this very well , even paradoxically, but let's say the same nabokov who did not like dostoevsky about what we didn’t know then, i loved in advance, than

i loved dostoevsky dostoevsky later, when you worked for yes, this is fate, i am grateful to fate. what she gave me the opportunity to do is not even what to shoot, because to enter this world fyodor mikhailovich i would be an unhappy person and myself. right now, i can't even imagine myself here without that's it, you know it. well, i'll even take a change to say. this is somehow already a part of me, of course, living for the school curriculum is a little bit, but it’s a bit complicated, and therefore i am, well, thanks, who doesn’t know dostoevsky great writer. dostoevsky what is there to say? what, well, what crime is the punishment there or list something yes , so more than that by then. i haven't read much yet. but when it was already started, something from everything just read everything that is here. today we will talk about an idiot, an idiot is a very voluminous novel, and how? it seems to me that it contains the whole matrix, here are

the russian characters and the characters are characteristic of dostoevsky, and this novel was written in post-reform russia, that is, after the abolition of serfdom, and it seems to me that a new hero was needed, and dostoevsky tried to find a method to make a positive hero, because the main character is a prince, myshkin , whom everyone calls an idiot. well, because he has epilepsy and. well, in general, he really just does not comply. uh, he has some rules of decency. eh, the other one. yes , the principle of interaction with people and therefore he is rashly called an idiot and roman is called an idiot. do you think dostoevsky managed to make a positive hero, because it's hard to make a good character. we are definitely, for sure. they will answer this question. i 'll start with a seditious thought that has just been born to me. this is not homemade. here's a wonderful one. of course, who is the main character. they don't do it early. well, prince of the mouse, yes.

and that's what i thought, for sure. no, there's a lot of characters, it's a mosaic, it's a mosaic, and it just pops up. e prince myshkin i would say so, er, a lighting device. it highlights the characters in this book idiot very nice and i think god she let in nastasya philippovna himself. this is one of the most unthinkably complex paradoxical images in history, literature, culture, in general , this is how it was difficult for nastasya filippovna to let it all in. and what do you think about this character anastasia filippovna, that is, some seem to be such a heavyweight. yes, these are not just replicas that need to be said through a dash, yes, and

make them your own. and they are preceded by a description. what state is this woman in? and what happens to her after she has something said? and you understand that you have no voice, no data, no nerve, nothing in order to realize this plan. well, it's just the distribution itself, as it were crushed. i remember the day of the theater was march, the month of the idiot bulletin board, i saw everything. and he told me, so yuri ivanovich is eryomen. uh, our director of the theater of the moscow city council, now we need to find the limit. just a human limit. i need you to laugh like that. how are you well, i never allowed myself in my life, or for example. well, that's any quality to reach your personal limit. so he helped me gave this key, that is, the key is at the limit at the limit on

his own, and then in general she is a bitch or she is a kind person. i think that neither one nor the other is by any means impossible, so categorically by no means. it's not this, it's not defined, either or that's the point. she is the elusiveness of quite the characters. i have everything. so i don’t rule out at all that even dostoevsky is choosing exactly the characters. he always had a principled attitude to this, he was a saint, he looked in himself . what is a population? means? yes it's sunday, thank you, actually, they say. aglaya light shine, you understand seth, this is the lamb of god barashkova, she is not accidental. in the sense of elusive and this is also fyodor mikhailovich is an established point of view, which i absolutely agree in any other hands the works of fyodor mikhailovich dostoevsky would

have turned into. ah brazilian serials there. well, what didn't happen, you know? yeah, that's all, or , uh, some kind of detective. yes, isa, because he himself was talking about this, i read his diary entries. it either had trama in it. yes illegitimately born child or all. this is a bit of a brazilian series, but in the hands of mikhalych's feudal lords, it becomes high to fly that he wrote to him like that. it is important for me to catch reading or to interest him, and then already yes, this is such a novel. it's something incredible. i can't, i'm just translating, i think how it is. well, they wrote about it, and even modern critics wrote about it, what is it? the variety of characters is so damn good. well, everything, paradoxical laughter. here they remembered. yes, they laugh. there on each page 10 times, from time to time they start to laugh, then all in unison, then stuck

on that one, and most importantly, and this, you understand? yes what is sometimes seemingly completely unaware, right? yes, yes, and chatting them back and forth. so i just wanted to say that i was just re-reading it, and i had the feeling that they were all acting these characters in a state of altered consciousness. they experience extremes all the time. that's how catherine said extreme limiting emotions. and it really could be a brazilian series. if it wasn't. that's somehow mysteriously missing person. so exactly psychology and characters. if it were not for such incredibly difficult people behind this, everything complicated there, although it hurts, but the boy kolya even it would seem to be certainly a minor character. and the way everything is not easy there is watered. and how do you come up with all this? how is that in the head? how this one i don't know. here is fyodor mikhailovich, therefore fyodor mikhailovich because he is human nature and in

particular in the novel you do. this is what i hear. you know how to the bottom gave. no one can go further with him vladimir ivanovich but uh, i, for one, have, uh, a tendency to guess. e according to dostoevsky. if, for example, i meet a person somehow. i don't understand his motivation. this is easier for me to find. here is some character of udostoevsky to find the key to the person. that is, i understand, and this is a leg of a christmas tree. this is parfyon rogozhin . yeah, this is probably prince myshkin. that is, i have, uh, and it seems to me that there is no other writer who would, and that's it, an encyclopedia. these are precisely the psychology of russian characters created. and do you know, that on death to years they opened. uh, opened the bible and a string. read from above, he predicted death for himself very curiously, because that's the way it is vladimir ivanovich well, these scenes, here in an idiot, i read there 15 to 10 characters that disappear in one scene,

for example, when nastasya filippovna throws money there . yes to fire. it's very difficult there. everything is psychologically connected. yes, there is a ganichka who is looking at this money there, come on, get the money out of the fire and the perfume rogozhin , who is waiting, will go with him from the filipino line this money da paid for the night. here, uh, right there is prince myshkin, who offers her his hand in the heart. right there, her seducer sits, yes, to whom, in theory, he sits evaluates what the woman says. look he general says bring up. he actually created parts of it. yes, yes, yes, that's all. people are unimaginable. here's how the director ru, how can this be filmed at all, because uh, while one person is talking. yes , there for half an hour it is not clear what others are doing. and how do you choose the editing room, what is more important is the reaction of the character to what someone says or how? someone says some words. as

you know, this is such a question, yet too general it is meant every time. um, well, i was filming something because i was filming. i read, i see everyone, but i know kina, i will bring you not a saint at all. mikhalych, these are wonderful situations, you can't go to war. yes, and there is a very analogue of pyatong, and we see nikulin like that, yes, but basically this is all that the penguin did, he almost passed, damn it, nothing to do there. that's why i would always take care of my eyes. no, it can, it's the wives there the number of characters. it's crazy in these scenes in all of you trying to present the mise-en-cinue. she sometimes writes mikhailovich sat down at a round table and so on, seemingly impudent, a local village that he had some mesoncenic signs. well , anyway, it's something. it's something, it's not this incredibly boiling, that's the passions and in general these

circumstances. but in the theater, here we are for everyone difficult ekaterina i also can’t imagine how this should be treated. yes , in general. well, probably, probably, it will be whose eyes we will now show in this. maybe well first, for this is not a talented person. it can't be. sorry, you need to somehow understand a little something you are doing. and then we need to come up with something, because, well, yes, in the theater we see everyone at the same time. and it seems, it seems that it is easier, in fact, everything is more complicated plus. now ways have already been invented when we change even in the theater and so on there. similar case in this, answer unequivocally to this question. impossible, fucking impossible, these theatrical movie attempts. yes, and recreate it all in first of all, to attract readers to read

the novel. in the direct and refactoring on the first in the field of creativity, nothing is stamped. therefore, those who did not understand the irony in this name are fools. in chocolate, that is , they show us so often and they probably watch me, my friends. i wanted them to laugh at that moment. roof a little you do not see morning night. this greatly affects us, we were already asked to fill out a questionnaire before settling in the house and there was a question. do you have a girlfriend? we all babysit honestly oh yes. i liked her undoubtedly. outwardly, she is a wonderful person, but i understood that this is some kind of something here we were at the concert of alexander marshal and then, when they tell me that i will sing with him before that. and the premiere of the star factory 20 years later

on friday at the first pain, there may be a different mechanism for the development of pain 1 does not matter. what caused the pain, if there is pentalgin universal remedies against different types of pain due to the combined composition pentalgin acts against pain, wherever it is, regardless of the causes of its occurrence, pentalgin will do without pain 1.000 rub. for inviting friends to tinkoff before june 30 and together participate in the drawing of 100 million rubles. how fun it is in tinkoff until june 30 for each friend you will receive 1,000 rubles.

suddenly receive as a gift or 500 rubles. or 100% cashback from partners or a free subscription to one of the popular services. and together you will participate in the drawing of 100 million rubles. bring your friends to tinkoff until june 30 and get guaranteed prizes. tinkoff he is such one it is difficult to choose a car, who suits the car does not suit the price, who fits? the price does not fit the car, and when you find the perfect car with the perfect price, the account goes for a second loan for both a new one and a used car. through a lifetime.

have fun for inviting your friends to tinkoff until june 30 and together participate in the raffle of 100 million rubles. he is so alone. bring your friends to tinkoff until june 30 for each friend you will receive 1,000 rubles. suddenly receive as a gift or 500 rubles. or 100% cashback from partners or a free subscription to one of the popular services. and together you will participate in the drawing of 100 million rubles. bring your friends penkov until june 30 and get guaranteed prizes. tinkoff he is one throw away the car. it is difficult who fits the car

does not fit the price, then it fits, the price does not fit the car and when you find the ideal car at the ideal price, the count goes to seconds. this podcast is a must read. i am aglaya on batnikova, the director is a writer, the director is visiting me. vladimir khotinenko, and actress ekaterina guseva, we are discussing dostoevsky's novel idiot can you ask ekaterina, this is how you see the relationship between filippovna and prince myshkin, well, for the first time myshkin saw the portrait and he disappeared to see his eyes. he said in those eyes of suffering a lot everyone laughed raised him to death, but he alone saw in her. here is the lamb of god yes lamb to you. a sacrifice, if you want an innocent one, because who

is this nastya girl, her mother burned less than her father, burned alive, her father sang, her sister died, whooping cough died, that is, this is an orphan that a wealthy totsky landowner cleaned up and at the age of 13 noticed a bud in her, which will become a rose and placed in elegantly decorated rooms and in general brought up and hired her a governess such teachers, but they taught her not only french, yes, maybe nabokov was offended because of this. this is lolita's leak, but it is. so they have a lot in common and butterflies yes, yes, yes, yes, here. he says, vaughn then asking why i hate so much despise because you have prepared me for debauchery. and i think that since childhood she has bitten off this physiology, an abomination. i think that she did not return to this at all to physiology. i did not find anywhere in the novel her point of physical connection with any of these e

men who surround me all the time talk about it, she already behaves like that and presents herself like that and behaves, but whether it was really me, by the way, it also interested me, but it followed between the lines between the letters diagonally, i didn’t find something . found a phrase. uh, rogozhin arranged orgies at the station , anastasia ivanovna is present there. what is an orgy, it's not in our understanding, so, that 's how to say it, it's death. unless she knows death. maybe, maybe we can, well, at least she's got clothes scattered around, i mean, she's naked, because it is so to bully dear wives. so why does it seem to me that she ended up with him, she herself did not sit down to take the knife. she hmm wanted to say to herself through it with her hands. i think so. here, but now we will return to the relationship with myshkin. why she does not get married is impossible internal. i

wonder what is the key of ekaterina, how did she explain it to herself, she tried to somehow think highly. afraid to destroy him. yes, she considers herself a fallen woman, she does not want many men very much, but when she saw christ, she suddenly realized what love is? and when you are ready to give your life for another, it is not carnal. uh, yes, absolutely, and it seems to me that this is a feeling that she was not familiar with. and suddenly, but this nature yes of this feeling, that is, a spiritual connection is not close. here, yes, but of course, the feeling of understanding who she is and the unwillingness to defame and desecrate and it is impossible to be around. i would be here more say. so, if you are an attorney philip, i would like to act

as a prosecutor, because there is a character there is still an ogle and you need to go, which is rival. nastya filippovna for the prince. they are here, like a fool idiots. two such women clung to him. yes two beauties one, so to speak, fallen another noble. here they are because of him, in the end they go there in one scene and after which anastasia filippovna she, on the one hand, wants him to marry aglaya, so to speak, he was happy, on the other hand. in the end, she does not let him go and shows aglaya, right before her eyes. she says he is mine and now you will see that i will tell him that he will be at my feet, and he will be and that is, this turns out to be such a pseudo-sadism, that is, she shows aglaya that e myshkin belongs to her and indeed, this is how myshkin happens. it seems to me completely unexpected even for reading or choosing nastasya lipovna stays with her. and i say, seeing these hesitations, he runs away and never sees myshkin again. that is, well , it turns out that the whole series is complete. she has

selfish motives. that is, it is not that she is not a saint at all; she has a sense of ownership and is tormented by her dear wife. she it seems to me very high-quality with pleasure, as she was once tormented so she torments all men aglaya, she says in this scene. she says, if you wanted, it seems to me that this is real or in fact, she was offended not by the relationship with the prince, so to speak, she was offended, because then she says, if you wanted to be an honest woman, you would go to the laundress . after all , we can say that aglaya is right, that is, nastasya filippovna did not go to the laundress. she really walked with rogozhin, yes, and in in general, she presented, so to speak, her tragedy all the time very convexly, showing everyone that she had lived her life. in general, luxury is enough. i don't know well. she is not trained, she, dear, is a thing that has been used, you cannot get out of this scenario

of an expensive thing when you use it, the great mighty russian language. yes, you know the expression everyone knows him, probably, i love you so much. what a choke is ready. yes, ready to kill would have killed, yes. and it seems to be only a clear speech, in fact, there is content here, but i am in russian there are so many sayings in the language that are not translatable at all and in another, even in the cultural space, it is even impossible to imagine, go there, i don’t know where it will bring. i don't know what you understand, yes, you know the apostle paul has a epistle to rhythm. the first is a big part about love. i don’t know by heart, but we are love, well, we more or less imagine, in general, this is love. i will say one more thing to attract the reader to this novel. let's attract today, if you read his letters carefully, nastasya filippovna is like a lai, i'll tell you, this is in general by the present times. then, probably, people did not

think about it, as he writes. she still needs such words and there to live for how long and somehow uniquely, and how piercingly it seemed that dostoevsky fired all these minor characters there. uh, kolya and his swan of some sort in this general ivolgin. there are many of them. he gives them some interesting monologues all the time, but all the time it seemed to me that this was because dostoevsky played. he needed money. at the time, publishers paid by word count. it always seemed to me that all these watered superfluous are not related to this main intrigue. i do not exclude purely theoretically that he stretched the volume. yes? yes, here, it seems to me, the volume and nothing like that. if it’s done like fyodor mikhailovich, you, please, this is valka vot but fyodor mikhailovich has, uh, most of it, he

starts such a digression, he has a lot of such authorial, sort of digressions, and yes, of course, we attract writers, attract non-traditional characters with something original appearance tips. and what to do with and what to do with personality radians and beyond fedor mihailović begins his position on the ordinary people. and as they are, uh, you can’t shoot boringly. it's boring to understand, and what about the ordinary ones, there are further. then he gives examples, they he has. ganya, and it’s a tragedy in our dinar, but he doesn’t want to be ordinary and you say it to him, so you understand nothingness, he is a gani, he says how we were, that who you are you pretend to be and there are a lot of characters and gani’s sister, she is kazakhstan and how is she? yes, and he begins when fyodor mikhailovich is a writer. he starts a dictionary. for example, he says he is a barbarian. a

how she will then leave, how she is intertwined throughout dostoevsky's life it seems to me that there are no ordinary personalities. no, that's just how it gets it, just it's called it just says, what should we do? suddenly you understand, and he turns them into something extraordinary, and this is already his genius. you understand here. after all , jesus is generally some kind of environment, generally speaking, it is impossible not to play jesus without doing anything at all. jesus can be done only here, yes, it can be done in a conditional work like this, yes, jesus christ can be done in the opera - superstar by the way, well, too, yes , yes, they are there, yes, yes, they did some kind of there or but, in principle, it plays. everything is done by the environment. that's either a child or mary magdalene who was or that. well, the environment does it. that's the problem. it is for

the whole world, therefore, and somehow why , it is quite difficult to infect. well, the whole topic, alben, there are christian motives. are you coming? yes of course, here is a picture of the get. yes, he himself there is a lot of his personal all these stories these minutes about the death of the conversation. why do oglipes dance? so so don't talk about death. don't say nothing. here, and before that, he told them to them and told them how he was on the guillotine execution - these are men and how the bag and katya are . he includes so many stories of his life there don quixote and a note hides volumes of don quixote in the eye, a poor poem. there is so much more personal plus everything. this is what mikhalchik was never shy about, including the player wrote to earn money. yes, we needed

money all the time, but at the same time, it's on that level , so personal, so deep. he intimate experiences. then he invests that, in principle, it ceases to be important, really. you know quite a few geniuses , including michelangelo who worked to earn money. you know ivan bergman, the genius director's motivation, he has an amazing interview with him that ends with saying, you know, don't. here are these lofty words. this is herman, one of his last interviews. actually, we are doing. what does the carpenter do who makes the chair the cobbler who is now the essence of our how to do stay but in general, everything, you know. you know, it's you who are scurrying around here, i'm tall, you know?