so they and about you, so the question can only be the cape themselves are adults, or we will, as soon as our children cry, immediately get up and run to the cyril. calm down. well, listen, let's, after all, we become more mature ourselves. yes, and we begin, but to remind ourselves that , in general, our emotions that we experience, the pain that brings us, is not a consequence of the circumstances that we encountered, this is a consequence of our reading of these circumstances. here is a vivid example you said, he rarely sees his daughter. i asked, more precisely, well, once or twice a month. by video calling question why is it rare? it seems to me that it is rarely more often wait. come on, just prove to me that this is it, if they look at it, they lived in a traditional, so to speak, family in their own way, that is, if they left, they would

work equally. in the evening i would return to see the children, in general seven times they are insignificant now. yes? i'm talking about what i'm talking about once again returning you to the thought. wait, your emotions are not the result of the number of meetings that occur, it is the result of the fact that you think that this is rarely enough. so it shouldn't, and it's not uncommon and a lot it's less than you want for your daughter, but less than you want and little is not the same. well actually. and why should everything in this life be the way we want it. in your life, everything is as you want, and in my life, when we get something immediate from what we want, it is not very useful. let's still return to the situation when elena has another man, of course, let's go to this situation for 5 years. i understand that

we don't want this not easy. well, why not? well, you're lying, look, honestly, no, no, what are you? i don't lie at all, never. in fact, you are registered in this e, where people sit and twist, they don’t fit, dating is called 3 days. i stayed there, it became, it’s just that this whole questionnaire is incorrectly configured. i am a theorist, which means about expert master. yes, i am a practitioner for working with people who are on a dating site. so here 's the main problem. why don't people get there? yes, they don’t find someone. this is because they believe that they need to open it right away and found. but these dating sites are somewhere out there, you just need to treat everything, like gold comes to look for gold or scoop somewhere on the river, it means sand starts to sift the net like this sow sows sows sows sows

sows. oh, we need juice, it's bad about it, i understood well. it's just that, well, as if the sand is at the end, it means a grain of shiny gold. he takes her. and this is the second mistake. and they say they are gold. no, until you take a chemical little thing there , you won’t understand in a whisper that it’s just exactly gold. do not say that this is gold in ours there are a bunch of minerals. i've recently been at an exhibition in minerals. called gold for fools. chalcoperis, you understand, this is iron, but it looks like gold. here, therefore, means, here it is, and so it is gold for fools. this is gold for fools. this is gold for fools. hop gold is understood, that is, someone comes across immediately leads the first time. someone is overthinking. maybe well, you just have to set yourself up for what i sort out and each of this sand there will be gigolos and perverts. and these are all yes, here you are now

themselves that you have now catastrophized no for her no. i didn't say it was a word. hello to this maniac who why come you can even meet. well, it's simple, if we treat such people as well, the norm of life, sometimes they stick to beautiful women . there are perverts, so now there is no time to communicate with maniacs? i have other uh areas of activity, well, first of all, i have children. i bring them up many children. yes , secondly, i work. i am learning to continue to develop in my profession. that's all takes up all my time. well, i communicate with friends, i also communicate with friends. yes well, once again you have a desire to meet someone, meet someone, but do not spend all your time looking. here is this gold. i have absolutely no motivation. and this is not the main task for me

now, either there is no motivation, or there is no strength and no strength, but no strength. and where the strength goes, the strength goes into strength, the experience goes, or denmark is in anxiety in an insult over-zaduz for her daughter. well, there, too, there, too, you know. why are you offended again for her fate on her husband, right? former why because you think her fate is a bad setup? yes, i have that a child should grow up in a complete family, well , i grew up in a complete family, it's true. but the fact that children should grow up in complete families. this is not a lie, well, i would like to want it, i really wanted to have to lie. well, that is, you understand correctly that you are such a variant of the development of your life of your destiny, in which another man appears, and he is fine with you, everything is fine with him, and he becomes. here is this second dad for

your children. in principle, you don’t consider it, it will still be much worse than if you lived with your children’s biological father, or i want to understand how lena thinks about it, just because that biological dad doesn’t matter what he is did not love. the family doesn’t want you for a moment, but he was still better than another man who will adore you. and as they say that you love women, you love her children and will love your children, but he will not be a biological pope, so he it will still be worse than if it was biological, in my opinion, right? no wrong. i am not like that. you don't, you definitely don't. i don’t put a cross on myself at all already. so that it then prevents you from thinking about the fact that while the children. they are small and yet they need this significant man, and you will not find such a man in the first place either. why did they find it? because

natalia continue my phrase. we are already with you how to start each other phrases to continue, it seems to me, because we were looking for, or maybe because the first husband left such furrows on her heart, you understand that she lives according to your happiness, michael, she lives in some kind of subconscious fears. she has such a burn and the reflex twitches. all you understand, she is afraid to be touched. what's happened? yes , of course, but it makes it difficult to search. yes, therefore, the task is to work with the cause of fear, and the cause of fear is always a belief, for example, yes, but here, most likely, it is not fear, the divorce itself or something is the fear of pain. yes, yes, i agree. you know it seems to you that to the left if you go there will be pain to the right, if you go there will be pain. yes, it just won't be better not to go. well, yeah, relationships hurt. here, it might be. here, look. what kind of attitude brings pain in general, it's true. but what is the truth for? yes,

sorry, i just celebrated 25 years in a relationship. uh, a wedding like her silver poorly prepared. here, uh, thanks. yes, relationships hurt. but that relationship brings only the pain of this relationship brings pain and joy of limitation and opportunity. exactly they gave birth to beautiful children, i don’t hear at all without pain. do not remember, but there was such a motivation, i wanted children and there was a really strong motivation, what is our nature? now, it's not about motivation. it's about your fear. pain fear of pain also takes your strength and loads your nervous system fear of pain occurs not because pain is possible, but because there is an opinion that there should not be pain in life, that life should be. wow my love my unicorns and pink clouds.

yes, the denial of pain leads to increased pain. and vice versa, when we gradually, but regularly , begin to speak to ourselves elena. yes, in my life, there can be pain. do you know why there may be pain in your life, because you are a person, my good girl. here you are a person in your life, maybe more in my life and in the life of natalia and in life even in your daughter there can be pain. pain is a normal part of the life of a mentally healthy person trying to throw away the pain. this is an attempt to become mentally ill. i have read your book. well, let's talk about what could be still a picture of your life, in which, of course, this pain will be, but joy and happiness

will be more justified and will cover this pain and overshadow it. as i understand it, there are two scenarios to leave everything as it is, even three, and try to build relationships differently with management literally. yes, you are like here, how to manage the relationship with the biological father of your children or radically reboot everything and maybe build this whole family with another person. which one of these options is for you? seems to you, well, more feasible and desirable. well, leaving everything as it is is not an option, otherwise you wouldn't have me here , just build a new family. well then, please, allocate time for this, because here i am working, children are studying, and here i seem to have no time, but i want no adult understands that if he wants something, you need to allocate time and effort and so ,

not enough i'm ready or want. yes, as there is not enough, listen, okay. we are now talking not theoretical advice is very smart. yes, we are sitting here all over the country to be smart. i to you i will say that it needs to be moved. that's 24 hours in a day. something has to move something. you'll have to take a risk. yes? yes. so what? well, uh, the sixteenth is so frank, yes , i confess to talking with you. i just started to open up. yes, like a woman. yes, and somehow already smile a little and already it turns out to shoot eyes, but well, literally a month like that. well, smart girl on the stream. well, it's just the beginning of the beginning. yes, once again try to get out, starting a relationship from not investing. just some kind of expectations, starting just, as it were

just eyeballing. remember, well, yes, yes, yes, that's how it will be, you will shoot more and more right there, you don’t put your soul into it. yes, no waiting, good fellow, now blitz your questions that you asked us before. yes, your questionnaire, how to explain that the children are not to blame for me. it will not be possible to explain in any way in the near future, but it will be possible to explain, take this position. i don't expect results. i just do it. and how to explain in words explain in words docha you're not to blame, and i'm not to blame. just it turns out. one time, second third fifth tenth twenty-fifth forty-fifth to explain, but not to explain heard. yes, the second, how to convey to children that dad loves them? report again, yes, but actually this is the task of the pope, therefore, in our entire conversation today. i never once heard you call your dad and say, hey, actually, you have

a daughter. she loves you. she actually cries be kind. explain to her more than once. and 10, that you love her? why didn't you do that? well, once here, when just, for example, with hysteria. we phoned him. yes, after all , there was some kind of dialogue, which means that it’s just important that it’s not at the moment of hysteria. and regularly regularly regularly regularly. vasya you have a daughter. i just saw, just such a denial. and why can't you do it with a cold head, call to discuss what's in the way, but as if i were again, this is my task somehow that's all, of course, these are your tasks, nothing terrible in this. no. there's nothing wrong with any kind of reaction. and what then, can be in your reaction? afraid. i know well cry still sometimes you don’t want to live, because you’re some kind of burn reflex again why are you afraid that you

will bite you and cry? yes, well, that is, to persuade dad to fall in love somehow. well , somehow convey the daughter to persuade. here he loves, judging by what he does, he loves. you just understand that people love them too, but in different ways, yes, so you just show that you can love in a different way. and and once and the second and the third and the fifth. for some reason it seems to me that if another man appears in your life, you will be different your relationship will be the future, you will stop pulling your arms and legs. here from this red-hot past of yours from a past that has not been ill, on the contrary, everything, when you stop pulling, you will have no, but you pull it, because this is the fear of pain. yes take it and feel the pain - this is once again the norm of life, yeah, here. well, last question. do i need to take on the role of mom and dad. and where do you go, take it, take it?

just don't make a mistake. yes, because look, this mistake, that i'm a dad, it means, well, the role of a dad, what do i earn there? i will provide. well, yes, but i'm like a mother, in everything , always affectionate, so gentle and understanding apa is also strict. but you know the mistake, what should be both dad and mom, it's kind of like me, my life didn't work out, it didn't work out. yes, it's okay to be both mom and dad. yes, okay. you are well done. you mulberry part is normal. yes, it happened so now the society of society, it happened, would like it differently, yes, but is it not a catastrophe. it was a podcast about normality, friends of the psyche, where i am a journalist, natalya loseva and my co-host, clinical candidate of psychological sciences psychologist. mikhail khors brings this very normality into the light of god and the story of our heroine. and lena will very, very much resonate with the hearts of many to come to

visit us. and all episodes of the podcast psyche. you can watch it on the first channel website. good day, dear viewers. i dmitry bug invite you to the next edition of the literary podcast. let them not speak. let them read. we pronounce this slogan very often and we want all of you to read with pleasure, to read anything e-books, papyri and parchments, and real books of the manuscript of the letter. this is a very important process of reading. we almost never read on the air, but we speak so that you begin to read. today we have a wonderful guest - this is dmitry danilov, hello, dmitry,

hello. and the children of danilov are a writer, a playwright, a poet. and you know, when i asked dmitry before the broadcast how best to introduce you, then, uh, dmitry said, well, a poet, you can write a playwright. it doesn’t seem to matter, in fact it doesn’t matter in which implaves to represent or anyway. it is for you somehow essentially all these roles. they are equally significant to me. here are all three words. well, one way or another they denote what i do, so it will probably be right to produce all three. it is very important for me to note that you, well, with such indifference reacted to the entertainment of these three hypostases of three genres. it seems to me that there is some great sense in this, because it rarely happens that a person, firstly, writes dramas. well, plays and prose, and secondly,

well, they are so united in goals that sometimes they don’t even do you understand right away? that you are reading a poem by danilov and either a story or a novel is all some kind of single tone. is this true or is this my false impression. it's hard for me to judge. that's what happens, perhaps, in part. so on the other hand. still, for me, these are different types of statements. and so they began to be added to me like this, but because of the need for some other type of statement. i started with prose, then, already in adulthood , it was added first, well, the poetry of the elements, and then there are others, just some, really. i will repeat some the need for another type of utterance appears and i feel it and start doing something to support it. still, more or less not the same thing, but the same, even if you look at our conversation from the outside. look, i'm waving my arms. i’m

somehow intoning your head there, you won’t succeed, because you are dmitry danilov , because you are a reserved person. here is a wonderful phrase. e in roma sasha hello, with which we will say in detail that there one of the heroes performed an action that is usually indicated by the word swim something like that. yes , there is such restraint in this, such a lack of emphases of pathetic gestures in order for a restrained person, but in general. yes, and you can say that your method is hmm provocative, let's say maybe you don't like it, but such a cold sober fixation of what is happening, not that the chest is plowed open. and hmm do not do that, as this is often the case in literature. no, well, don't do that. so i refrain in every possible way. it seems to me from

literature. she must not and cannot our time to teach in general she lost this function long ago, although it used to be, therefore, in principle, yes, some yes, she is restrained. well, i probably have. well, of course, to a greater extent. now, if, as you said, such a coldish observation is to a greater extent. still, juicy prose hmm in verses there, if i can allow some pretty strong emotion such verses, this is a much more spontaneous way of saying. it's something, it can be some kind of one-time emotion. this is some kind of random image. this is something that somehow breaks out, and the parsed long text itself rotates. they are usually long. all my poems are almost long. yes, but , nevertheless, it doesn’t matter to me, despite the fact that this is a long overlay for me, they are like that’s not segments from a point like that. that is something

one-time splash. like some kind of, well, usually some kind of emotion, but prose is something much more thoughtfully built something yes to do it's all too long. even some plays are written quickly. you can sometimes write in a day for a couple of days. here it is, anyway this is some kind of lengthy work, and poetry is not work at all. it's just a one-time outburst of some kind of emotion. well, this is a man, probably, wave your hand, but it looks so often in prose. e what is done completely unpretentiously or in a. well, it's not that this work is not felt, but this is a case where the numerator is the denominator. as if subjected to mutual contraction and as a result such a transcript is such a very calm rhythm. well , if i were danilov and wanted to describe, uh, our meeting with you, then i would say that on on the table were, uh, two small books and one larger, several sheets of paper, one

interlocutor waved his arms, and the other nodded his head and smiled. well, something in it , what does it mean, i would ask, if i had already turned into a reader and very often a reader. in my opinion, which will become familiar with the books. just dmitry danilov asks, just accustomed to russian literature, as such, what is it? uh , you said a thing with which i partially agree that the time for teaching has unconditionally passed, but very many are hungry for them still. yes, what to do with it? i think that there is a lot of literature of all kinds, and those people who are from literature. they are looking for some teachings of recipes, they will simply find such, as before, many writers really want to m-m shepherd the peoples to teach the masses something to call

some kind of high ideal. well, it's just that such readers will find such writers, and they will merge in ecstasy. and i think it was pretty good. these are not mine, so i understood the reading ones, well, i provocated a little, i ’ll say. i often talk, uh, on the verge of provocation, with my wonderful guests i will say. well, this is the same as the old time, they said reality-vism. yes, well, i don't do what's right, but i just do what i want, and next to it, there may be something wrong, but everyone will find their own. well, such a solomon in the decision and you're right, and you're right alone. uh, remember it says interlocutor that a black black is different. he says black and white. well, you are right, and you will find. well, that is, nothing needs to be done so that more readers still want that literature where black is called black and white is white. well just i must say that the truth is that what

it seems to me, what you say, is generally a reality. she's really very ambiguous. it is very worth everything from halftones. and in general , there are undoubtedly things in our life that we can attribute alone, probably, nevertheless, to good from others to evil, but there are not so many such things. here is the bulk of reality, these are different semitones, different, made in italy. well, as the desire for good, uh, often leads to evil a person who is drawn to evil, accidentally, suddenly does good, just quoting. yes, yes, the living, fifth part of her power, which desires evil, does good from now on, or something like that there in one and the same phenomenon. we can find both something that gravitates towards good, and something, such as evil, or to purify the good, is it necessary to increase its degree, is it necessary to increase its consistency, is it necessary to give some

criteria or magic glasses in order to be good and there is no difference from evil, and i would say so we started talking, we immediately approved it right away. and a few surprises. yes wow. it seems to me that in particular a lot of evil is happening. it is precisely from this desire of people to directly and rigidly separate the good from evil, right here to draw a line of demarcation, that this is to declare something, take some phenomenon, declare it some kind of absolute good and start for it. well, what is called, as they say now there to drown? yes, but on the contrary, to declare something absolutely black evil is the logic of communication, logic, chat, how many twice two? and the answer is stupid. well, yes, yes, that is. and here it is, uh, such a desire. something like this, hard dvalism is such a consciousness that there

is, on the one hand, absolutely good, on the other hand, absolutely evil, and it is necessary. here, all the objects of the world and all people must be placed on these two sides and you feel yourself. there is a lot of evil in the warrior of light, from this i will sharpen your thoughts. yes, there is a lot of evil from the fact that the good is excessively emphasized, but this is approximately what ivan karamazov has in the legend. about the grand inquisitor. yes? uh, probably yes, because in the thoughts of ivan karamazov. this text is not written, as if i remember. it's damn uh reads ivan karamazov's awareness in his brain. well, there this great inquisitor says to christ yes your teachings are true. this is the first point, the second. you can not cope with its introduction into life, the third go away. i know better how to implement your teaching to force. well, how would that be the logic. yes, even what is considered good, justly becomes evil. well, here's something

close to it. there is another expression i don't remember. what, what is terrible. here is the foam of rage, on the lips, of an angel. yes, yes, yes. for good they fight with such fury that bones, you don’t compare them later, well, that’s what i mean. you know, i wanted to build our conversation in a completely different way. i was going to talk about your literary past. it is interesting and curious. you were part of different literary communities, such semi-underground famous crazy mad men, it’s difficult to pronounce the phrase, but everyone remembers him, who in the eighties was already in literature, but we started talking, otherwise, i think it’s no accident, because i wanted to continue it hmm talking about uh your uh book that became one of the most talked about last year,

if not the most talked about, is the novel. hello sasha, he was crowned with the uh, yasnaya polyana literary prize. he was very close to winning the big book award. this is publicized. let's talk about this book. she is very small. and someone told me that she was so humane. well, i mean, it's not fat. history, as is often the case. well, in general, everything is clear, well, not from the first page, but from the first ten pages. hello sasha. this is a strange name. maybe you will say briefly what is meant by this name. perhaps he now does not need to tell the full content. those who have not read. let them, probably, get their well , either pleasure or disappointment. let them read. well, i’ll just say this to create some intrigue, that sasha is not

a person, but there the main character’s name is siri already, and sasha is some other entity , the plot line is that the main character is a university teacher in some indefinite future. uh sentenced to you sentenced to death. yes for what we used to consider quite so, well, misdemeanors, but not a crime for having a relationship with a minor student, of course , minors, but according to our adulthood and according to a fictitious conditional law , this is the one that operates in that reality, there are 21 years of age, and 20 , well, with a twenty-year-old girl. she seemed to be quite mature. here he is sentenced to death. and so the sentence should be carried out in very strange conditions for us in such a specific, very comfortable prison. and then the whole book is about how

main character. uh, living with that, the book is a huge percentage of dialogue. there are a lot of conversations there. the main characters talk to different people who surround him, first in ordinary life, then in this comfortable beautiful prison. and in these conversations, mm, we see how he tries to live with this, this is the situation of a person who is executed at an unknown date, maybe today. or maybe it will live all its life and die in its bed , please say, but in fact, how does this differ from the collisions that were in literature, well dozens of times, but the most obvious parallels. well, for example, the process of kafka's france , where certain languages ​​remind our viewers, who suddenly have not yet read franz kafka. they did it in vain, they think so in the novel of france, a certain language meets two

people who say that he is sentenced to death. we won’t say for what, when we will execute me , let’s say exactly, in a year they will execute him, but it’s absolutely the same collision. eh, this is the most understandable kafka. that life goes on, they don’t put him in prison, they even let him go completely will, but he can no longer live in peace, because he misrepresents. why was i actually executed? that is, his life remains the same, but it changes its modality, so to speak, yes, the invitation is punished for the last day of the sentenced execution, then, uh, the famous scene from the novel of the idiot dostoevsky which also narrates about the last dnieper holiday. this is the emotion of a person who is facing a death sentence , it is not known when hmm he will be carried out , this sentence identifies his life with by itself. after all, we are all condemned, right

? yes, we will die and how to live with it we ask. we don’t even need to pronounce a verdict on this roman or is he still socially critical or is he some kind of specific, if he is about this, then this has been written more than once, but there is nothing new here, or uh, it’s not like that all- what are we talking about here. well , firstly, i still should, probably, at least mention. it's such a simple fact that, of course, the author should never answer questions. what does his thick book say? that if you don’t understand what karenina is talking about, then list it again. yes, yes, everything is written there, and in fact, i should be asking or what happened to the dratuta. here, uh, i wrote some kind of framework like this. in general, i compare the construction of the plot with this one with no, i won’t even throw it off. in general, for me , this is like such an empty pipeline, such as this is complex. but fill it should be read, or if this performance is also first

the director, then the audience with their understanding. it seems to me that the author does not owe his idea. so here it is well, promote. especially to develop them. it may not be here. such here are certain yes , the attention of our viewers is a two-move at the end of the first part of our conversation. danilov tells baku that the readers should sort it out, he says to the reader. understand read. i think that this is a preliminary conclusion of our conversation, the first part of it in the spirit of dmitry danilov and now we have, as always in our podcast. e in the middle of the conversation , about in the middle. uh, insert rubric, and at this moment in these few minutes we are doing one of the three, either we u hold in our hands, uh, and uh, gently caress old books, or we read a poem and try to understand it, despite the fact that it seems to us to be smooth

poems, or we read some phrase from the classics and try to refresh it too. well, today we are doing the first of the three, uh, named actions, namely yes, we are picking up, uh, two uh, books, and the shelves i have removed, as always, our own shelves. these are two editions of the collection by nikolai stepanovich gumilyov, by the way, nikolai stepanovich is pretty, a significant name for some works of dmitry danilov e. i don’t know if there is a hint of gulev here. and i 've read it. i calculated. yes, so you see how danilov e. conspirator is, uh, two editions. e books by nikolai stepanovich gumilyov about his team who have a pillar of fire at the end. p. they b. a pillar is such a biblical reading of these books, they are almost identical, they are wonderful in their tactile capacity. well, you see, they

are glued by me lovingly. yes, but the important thing is that one is published according to the new spelling, the other is the old spelling in this one. the whole thing is one came out in berlin and the other in st. petersburg and there is a very wa subtext, because here is the imprint of the st. petersburg edition. here is such an indication printed in the fifteenth state printing house, the former printing house of goliki and vilborg, the past is emphasized before the revolutionary in august, 21 years. i think this clarification will tell us a lot, because it was in august, at the age of 21, that nikolai gumilyov was shot and this is a book. eh, cannot be called posthumous in the full sense, because it was prepared under gumilyov's life, but it turned out. so this book appeared posthumously. and these are the two collections i have, and it is very important to understand that poetry can only be perceived as collections.

i always say this to students in exactly the same composition of things as the author intended, and the book pillar of fire is a late one. unfortunately, the late billion, he would not have been if he had still lived, the set years of the late gumilyov, crossing out so many standards of perception, we are used to thinking that this is an e hmeist - this is a poet who precision and peace. no, it's not really. so this is poetry of a very high intensity. and now i will quickly read you one of my favorite poems from this particular collection. it is called the sixth sense, beautiful wine in love with us and good bread, that a woman sits in the oven for us, which is given to us at first exhausted to enjoy, but what should we do with a pink dawn above the chilling skies, where is silence and unearthly peace, what

should we do? we with immortal verses do not eat do not drink do not kiss the moment runs uncontrollably and we wring our hands, but again condemned. go all the way past, like a game boy forgetting his own, sometimes watching the girl’s bathing and knowing nothing about love everyone huddles with a mysterious desire, as once in the overgrown horsetails the creature roared from the consciousness of impotence, a slippery creature, sensing wings that had not yet appeared on its shoulders so century after century. will the lord soon cry out under the scalpel of nature and art, our spirit is exhausted, giving birth to an organ for the sixth sense. here is such a great gumilev, a collection of pillars of fire, which is very correct to read, if not literally in antique editions. well

, at least in the composition as the author intended. so, a literary podcast is on the air, let them talk, let them read. i am dmitry bug talking with the poet, prose writer, playwright dmitry danilov. let's talk about dramaturgy, let's talk here, probably, maybe i 'm wrong, but still the most e, sounded to this moment of the work this man from podolsk yes, and i have such a question. eh, not provocative either. a banal why from podolskaya what does it mean specifically if to say that a person from podolsk podolsk arose there, uh, by chance it could be any other city near moscow, uh, i just know well longer, because i lived there for some time not in podolsk itself but in a small, very small village right here sculpted to podolsk, the village of bykov

, just like this bykov, just not where the airport was before this, yes, and this, by the way, would also be. ku is also called by the inhabitants. in general , they call him a bykovka. well, officially they are bykova. well , they lived there with my wife, for some time it was just then they returned to moscow, so i often visited podolsk with my relative, my friend lived there. unfortunately, a very good musician died a few years ago. i often visited him in podolsk, i just visited him a lot of times, i know him well, so i somehow naturally chose podolsk if i knew better, lyubertsy i would choose lyubertsy in the fact that it is podolsk that nothing has been deciphered , especially could be any other. but this is not kashira and the metal is there, well, after all, yes, well, there are a little distant cities there already hmm they have a different mechanism of relationship with the center with moscow at least simply, because it is a very long drive from them. here from podolsk there to go an hour train to the kursk station stretches. here is the sphere. well,

it’s not up to the dokashira anymore. i have also been there many times, and here in taldy. well, it stretches a lot. i have the beginning of dead souls. remember how two men argue there is a wheel or not? that will not reach kashira. yes, and it is important that it is somewhere close to moscow, that it is a suburb and this one. the same person surname, like sasha, i noticed it quite recently, he is a surname. and by the way frolov yes , is it really for you e don’t remember soot, really. yes, you know too, it's just taken from the ceiling, when for a long time i also had some frool stepanovich in my early stories. that is, you can say that this is it.