Skip to main content

tv   PODKAST  1TV  July 1, 2023 5:20am-6:00am MSK

5:20 am
in general, a woman in the modern world. and perhaps, many even difficult to understand. and what is it bad to get a job with a rich man from the age of thirteen ? is that bad? its cool. yes, it's going great. that’s what this stain cannot suffer from, which means that it can be washed off from the soul, and that broke me. yes and now, she is broken and takes revenge. is it that the main thing to convey to the modern, however, it is interesting for girls, women today around sex before marriage. now it's just not a problem at all and it's really impossible even explain to people, but what's the problem? well, there you think before marriage, she lived with some rich man. it's really cool, the audience loves nastya and philip, how she reacts to the scene with money, she has fun. well, that's how philip plays cruel men mocking people. unfortunately everyone accepts 100.000 as 100.000. and that's several million. you see, those
5:21 am
100,000 for our thousands, well, she has money for a separate issue. by the way, yes, he already wrote it alone. forgive some, that he has this money. well, i'm not talking already and hard at him the topic of money he has her like that. this is such one of the key, what makes money in this world is still better than fedor mikhailovich is not enough. who did it, so throw the fireplace. it seems to me that through money the characters of the characters are determined. here is how myshkin relates to money. yes, he distributes a peacock to some fictional son. that is , as he says. i know that you are not really a son who has fallen, but i will still give you 10,000, if only you calm down. yes, there is nastasya filippovna who knows the value of money at the same time and uses it. uh, anyone the man asked a question. yes, he seems, uh, indifferent to money. he got an inheritance, you know? why didn’t
5:22 am
vladimir ivanovich aglaya refuse him two women here, no one will accept him without money, he can’t be a woman without money. yes, yes, but you have something to do with it, every time you have more than one akkala. that's it, that no heroine. yes, please tell us how you saw grushenka, how nastasya philip is grushenka, in general , dostoevsky's favorite female psycho-psychotype is a holy sinner. that's how it is for a woman very harmoniously combined. yes, this is dualism. these swings, this apollinaris pendulum, after all. in his life, this is the polynarium of apollinaria suslova, his beloved. yes, the femme fatale of his life. she was such a vladimir ivanovich, well, in general, in general. yes, he literally writes. we’ve got a contra, she says
5:23 am
, we’ll put it on where it’s necessary. the person on her wore dark glasses apollinaris, just dark glasses, you understand that we’ll put on dark glasses to get a haircut, and she ’s already a nihilist. she's already everything. this this is all. this is mikhalych writing. e in ioke. but it was this that haunted her all her life, that is, this woman who changes her faces correctly. it has one side, there is another , and there is a balance between them, and these manifestations are polar. well, like marmalade in sonechki. it would seem, yes, this is probably the most striking example, but they exist and in every heroine there are just such women, you worried attracted his attention, you know? we can formulate here, how we want to formulate. why is she like this? i think it's the answer is no, really nothing to do. that's why music is the greatest of couscous. you understand these. again, some kind of musical theme, for example, yes, here is anastasia lipovna there or someone else's music, she does not articulate, she
5:24 am
lets out feelings. but our nature. and why the spirit, i now think this is such our national nonsense. there is such a true sign of dui, and it is in all of them. in these, in all the persons of dostoevsky, so, my theory flows from our territory, this vast space. understand? here is another plus. this is another plus some kind of capacitor. this after all, the battery is a piece of land. he lost this world, his power went to him, that's all, you understand, this is a battery - i am absolutely convinced. this is no metaphysics. this is physics and this is the battery we have and we are sausages, you understand, we are not all capable of coping with this. so dostoevsky has this, idiot - this is, well, a direct lustration of this. here you go. you say that music is the greatest of all artificial. yes, and that literature is impossible, but to transfer it to the screen, right? you
5:25 am
as a director have, uh, a tool that no other art has, it's a human face. it is impossible to convey a human face, his facial expressions, the director, there is some kind of his own method of work, but i can’t torture katya to speak. you know, look at me now. like this, or in the place of stanislavsky, to run through the translation is to fall out and so on, look at him, yes, or i can’t say, i don’t play anything. it's not just a face that i sculpt. i have to convey my ideas. it should be clear to katya and sow this seed, which will sprout. they're just there for something. although there is a director who is successful, here so model. and it seems to me, happy is he who has not read.
5:26 am
if the primary source was a book, you understand, then i have my own and myshkin is mine to me, if the primary source is a book, because it is so strong and no pupkin tyutkin ivanov petrov sidorova e will convince me, because i have my own these characters revived who live inside me. that's what literature is, and it's very difficult to break through brilliant film adaptations by staging through my vision the feeling of these heroes. well, by the way, i heard from some men, that it was the reading of dostoevsky that broke their relationship with women very much, that is, when they saw these female characters, after reading them. so to say female nature that you understood that you should not have understood, and since then everything has gone wrong. it's amazing it can be a separate plot. well, the truth is that dostoevsky's woman is very unusual. they are truthful, but at the same time they are all very strange . the fact is that in general, it’s true
5:27 am
that there is no forgiveness for banality of life, it’s true that dostoevsky’s art is everything and poets wrote critics wrote that it's not here not here, it seems like everything is everything, but this is not life. it absolutely cannot be like this in life, and in this sense , fyodor mikhailovich has me, but maybe, especially in an idiot, this is a fictional world. this is the art world. you understand these female characters in the artistic world, and they turn out to be just an interesting world. that is, these characters nastasya filippovna and ogla does not work. they changed the face of world art in general. we can say so. don't know. i'm generally, uh, far from thinking. may not agree with me that art influences reality. e there is no confirmation of this no art. it is worth it in order to strengthen a person, in the sense of the universe. here is my firm point of view, and everything else
5:28 am
about the influence of the specific. well, maybe somewhere we will understand something for someone, but it affects everyone on everyone. no. here is such a paradox and what do you think, an idiot, can give something to the modern reader. well, look, either we are uh derogatory towards readers, because we ourselves say that we are bastard. i'm delighted. i am delighted too and many have read delighted. and that means the rest of the spirits, or what? i generally like to read. this, of course, is not easy. reading and, of course. well, it's not easy reading. e, although er, for example, for the third time it is not difficult. you are, after all , a man of stoyak vladimir ivanovich well, i think you know, uh, should i borrow a handbook from you? yes, yes i am today, for today, if i, well, alone, well, tell me, well, anyway, then you will say no, it’s difficult, you can’t name. well, yes, well, a book or there
5:29 am
isn’t one writer dostoevsky, i won’t think about it, and you know, i might even to be vulgar i will answer and reading it gives me pleasure. i'm wondering how this could be done. well, how can you write it? just just now, or is it telling him to get away so that i don't see you, but never in a few lines. she says okay, nothing. and that's how these are all the changes that boiling is. that's how i don't know, come on it causes. i just certainly have the east, too, a man of stostansky. i remember my first reading of the novel, and in school i, in my opinion, limited myself to, uh, crime punishment and, in short, something such in reduction by other works. here, and thanks to the role of me. hmm specifically already re-read, and i remember israel 14:30. i then sat for a week, which means i
5:30 am
was restoring my skin, because i burned out all but i was cold. it was the stage. i remember when the mouse of switzerland rides on a train with a rogozhin from that's just opening yes, yes, yes, yes, it's chill, this thin, light raincoat of his. here it is this chilliness. here it shakes a little. he does not know where to hide his hands, mittens. no knot and i was cold. i i remember that i was cold. i was looking for a way to hide from her. he says stop, wait, 14:30. i'm on the beach not tanya but plus 39. well, he even wins physiology wins elementary just like that, very simply good. thank you very much for the conversation. i was very interested. this was a podcast, a must read. i'm the main thing, i say the batch file the director is the writer. and we discussed dostoevsky's idiots in the sense it sounds yes
5:31 am
, dostoevsky's novel the idiot with director vladimir khoyenko and actress ekaterina guseva this is a podcast of the creative industry and in the studio roman pockets elena kiper and we are talking today with the great soviet and russian writer sergei lukyanenko and somewhere else they write, a psychiatrist. but seriously, well, that's right, yes, the former ex, well, there are always no former big mystery of how a writer gives birth to such massive huge works. how is it all born? how are you? how do you nurture you compose? or they themselves come more honor accounts for themselves.
5:32 am
i don’t really think that the profession of a psychiatrist is very important here, of course, there are a lot of doctors among writers and among science fiction writers too, but there are also dentists and therapists and surgeons. it doesn't interfere. uh, but, in fact, a medical education probably gives some kind of plus. like any education teaches. eh, to look at the world of the system, and since childhood i loved science fiction and for me, as it were, the main favorite technique, when i started writing, was to introduce some kind of unexpected fantastic assumption into the world, and only after one single assumption appears. you can see what's going on the world. is it possible to teach to be a fantasy? this is a tricky question to help you learn. you now have two projects at once, as far as i know, these are the stars over the donbass, one and
5:33 am
another lukyanenko's workshop - it's all about young beginners. uh, unknown, uh, writers, well, who or who thinks he is writing - uh, according to your observations. here. e. how many people from those who have been seen can become a writer really in the future, well, the stars in the donbass, after all, not really my project. hey, i'm in it. he started 5 years ago as a project of cultural assistance to the residents of donbass, because people were completely cut off from the media environment. they could not see the favorite performers of the writers, and we came to meet the readers. they just showed that they were not forgotten. and what about the hmm literary workshop? uh, right here, really. i think this is a very important big deal. uh, writing is a very lonely job writing. for the most part , he sits at home, at the computer and writes.
5:34 am
you know how in the early years of soviet power, the writers gave the name of a handicraft loner without a motor. this is how we stayed. as soon as we got a motor computer, and in order for a creative writer to somehow develop, he needs to communicate with colleagues, he needs to listen to you. not only the voices of readers, everything is clear there. there will be those who will scream. this is the best book that i have read and those who will scream that this is a terrible graphomania, in general stop writing forever. and here is the opinion of colleagues who also write support for their criticism. their. this is very important and for this how once existed before. uh, all sorts of seminars where writers and young authors gathered under the masters such as uh snows, belenkin. e, strugatsky well, there are many of our wonderful writers there. they, under the guidance
5:35 am
of these, er, writers, studied, sort of trained. eh, they understood what was good and what was bad. this tradition was broken for a long time for 20 years, at least. and now we have revived it here, er, the first such workshop was held in the fantastic city of korolev near moscow and 36 people gathered from all over countries. eh, they moved in. for the first time they saw that there are the same e people nearby, who are completely passionate about this and communicated during the week, they studied each other's texts. uh, the lecturers came. i mean, it was a kind of cauldron where they boiled, and i just saw that when they left, they were still boiling. they continue to communicate, argue , show each other fragments. that is, they have the opportunity to communicate. i want to get to that boiling point. but how, if i just wanted to, well, that is, i don’t writer, i have a very indirect relationship with writing. but i would like to know
5:36 am
how to do it. well, it's just hard to get there. uh, because it really is a selection. uh, and people come who wrote their first there second novel that they write. um, maybe next time we 'll do some kind of real event more open. where can you come and see. and you often go out to a large audience. well, if in the format of learning to work with colleagues with young authors, then the first time, that is, we had no. we had, of course, these kinds of events, but they were usually one-day events within the framework of some fantastic festival. uh, we met and discussed the works of young authors, but as a rule. there was a short form of stories; all this lasted there for 3-4 hours, this is the maximum. well, i don't know, it's not very serious. and here it was perfect. there is
5:37 am
an opinion that there is a deceived generation. well, it's approximately my age , maybe a little older, these are people who were brought up on soviet science fiction and which was, in general, a belief formed by science fiction writers. again, that, in principle, by 2023 we will already be on other planets, and we will have a completely different world. and now that nothing has happened. but this is a phenomenon. yes how do you feel about generation? is there really? maybe you yourself treat him the same way, well, to some extent, when i was still a very young man. i led fantasy lovers. i was 20 years old, i just corresponded by paper mail with similar clubs from other cities and so on. soviet union and i remember that when our reusable ship buran e flew, they wrote to me, well , people from some distant
5:38 am
corners of the country just wrote. yes, what a holiday for them, that we are starting to seriously explore the cosmos, that they were waiting for this, that is, yes, indeed. this expectation was not only among us. by the way, here is ray bradbury wrote. uh, literally years there, probably 10 years ago. uh, in some article. uh, about the fact that we should have been on mars right now, we should have been living on the moon. and instead, we traded everything for the fact that our mobile phones have become thinner. and the screen is shown with more colors. i have a sample. i tried when covid came. e went to learn to write. eh, before that. i studied at my academy and started writing the first script. and here is my first script that i put in the closet. started after 2 years with me was to happen. i mean, as write or those who have the power of the word fantasy, and this is further materialized. it's just that you understand it, it gently asks.
5:39 am
you see, because a huge number of films have come out, but there are apocalypse films sometimes the feeling is that it somehow begins to resonate with our reality. well, you know, here i can say, as a science fiction writer , yes, i can really say, as a psychiatrist, that this is self-programming, that is, by writing some kind of script and setting out some things that disturbed you. eh, apparently, since you wanted you to continue to move in this direction , both versions are quite real. so just take your pick a couple of weeks ago. uh, another one almost came true. in general, from the helen hyper universe has news that an unidentified flying object has appeared over e. the united states was involved in shooting them down in general, but therefore, in principle, what surprised me was that no one
5:40 am
was very surprised by this event. somebody is surprised, in our time you already somehow imagined that the twenty-second twenty- third year is the twentieth year. they 'll turn around like this for us and can you see beyond the horizon? well, of course, i had no idea, that is, the same covid. i honestly thought that by the end of the year i wouldn't thought it was a matter of months. but i think that by the end of the year it will resolve. i remember february. uh, we were flying abroad as a family and we just saw that part of the plane was sitting in deaf masks, and somehow it even amused us. what a panic among people, and a week later we flew to the city of london and london gave the impression of the city of london from an american post-apocalyptic film, because everything was practically empty, we went into a huge bookstore and there were only sellers in the store. and my wife and i are no one else and now
5:41 am
then i realized that it would be serious, but i still set aside half a year, but what was happening, but dragged on very much. here, uh, you understand, of course, you can look ahead, but the future is really very much too much. too many different forks. yeah that is, after all, this is our universe the universe of each person or our common one, because when we all believe in the same thing, in general , our synergy can lead. what do you think, can lead to we can, one way or another, maybe, at least at the level of creation some kind of general psychological picture of a general idea of ​​how the world will develop, that is, you know, this is called a self-fulfilling prophecy. that is, when a person, uh, begins to predict something and follows this path himself. e with people with states with the world. this can also happen, if we continue this topic , can writers or creative people
5:42 am
create such a reality that politicians will follow and public figures will eventually come somewhere in very good places, but we are trying. e we we're really trying. i used to sit and write science fiction about epidemics. i tried, on the contrary, to avoid this topic in every possible way. here. uh, well we're trying we're trying we're trying to write. uh, good things and good sense of the future. here , uh, this is our literary workshop, for example, it was built on the fact that we teach those who are trying to create a positive image of the future. well, first of all, the future of russia, of course, our country. well, actually, and the whole world, because those who write about nuclear war about the epidemic about the invasion of the planetan. i do not know there the disappearance of the moon to earth. they will always find their reader, people like to get scared and write something
5:43 am
negative. it's quite simple, but write. eh, positive things, even. utopia. this is already a challenge. unfortunately, i didn’t read it, but i watched the draft film, and there is one of the worlds where there is no oil and gas and everything is very peaceful. well, yes, well , it's really not that peaceful there. they still manage to clash a bit. well, yes, i removed it from there world neftegaz uh decided to see what would be there, there are several such interesting worlds. uh, there is a world uh, with the victorious feudalism, which has developed to the modern level and so on. there the picture was quite interesting of different worlds. unfortunately, of course, in the film it was only possible to slip along the edge not always. luckily a hero is born you like him, uh,
5:44 am
psychotherapist. well, as a psychologist, but you build it up or he himself begins to live in this world, but i usually get into it. it's ka tak, that is, uh, i'm making up some kind of world some situation. eh, let's say. let's say it exists in the world. uh, passages to other worlds to go through, through which you can tell some interesting smart story. this is the spectrum book, that is, aliens have arrived and placed portals to other planets everywhere, but in order to get through you need to tell something interesting and smart. and here are the main characters. he has this ability. and so he travels between worlds. and accordingly , from this idea grows, as it were, a common framework, and then you start to add some. well, as you know, here's, like, uh, stained glass. there is such a general mask of a stained-glass window, and then you start filling it with, uh, multi-colored
5:45 am
glass, and you get some kind of picture in general. at the beginning, you need to come up with some kind of this frame, this very thin grid. which holds everything, and then put the multi-colored glasses there correctly, it will be beautiful. i’m roman karmanov, and i’m elena kiper, we continue the conversation with sergey lukyanenko, social networks really guide us now and are we capable and should, for example, from them at least some share refuse? i think that, of course , you need to distance yourself, because you understand, there is such a cumulative effect of the accumulation of surrounding opinions. uh, a person comes online. he has some views. he involuntarily finds like-minded people. those begin to support these views and the person very quickly becomes radicalized. here he is from
5:46 am
some moderate position on some issue. he quickly jumps to some completely extreme level. e that they are good, therefore, of course, you need to control yourself, e on the network to understand that it net. it affects you too now 6.20 million people already visit the meta worlds and live there, well, there is good news, comrades. wait let me here calm down two days ago something about the fact that the meter of the universe is losing popularity dramatically. uh, investors stop investing in them and so on. people refuse. they don't, i'm sure it's unlikely that these scribes paid for it, inferior virtuality, it can't drag it out so much, you can talk as much as you like. what do you see, what a wonderful virtual house i have, how many rooms are there, uh, pools and peacocks walk, but at the same time, everyone generally understands that he is sitting on a sagging sofa, and he is building
5:47 am
some kind of virtual palaces there and parts arise, because children are born with gadgets in their hands. for them, these universes. they are already sewn on. they know how to share. i think they can. in any case, i look, but for my children, for their acquaintances. i have a feeling they are. now the current generation is calmer and healthier about this. eh, for our generation - it caused a little, in general, the emergence of such a conditional virtuality of the network. it was kind of a shock. many simply ended up at a depth and began to choke for the next generation there, perhaps those born at the beginning of the 2000s, but yes. it was such a very full-fledged environment, and they dabbled in it with pleasure, but the current one is already somehow differentiated. that is, uh. i made sure many times. uh, what, uh, the children grab, say
5:48 am
, some box with a board game, and put some card figurines. here they play this game with no less, if not much more pleasure than all the senses will offer in some network games. i'm sorry, general feelings, yes. then part of the population, of course, will use it, but this is still very far away. and how do you yourself react to the emergence of various new products you go to explore? what is there or so in general to rebuild? no, well, i like something, i go and explore something, i reject something. something just understand that, well, i don't need it. there, yes, an interesting gadget, interesting technology. then i think so. as a matter of fact, where will i use this wonderful gadget. not really needed for me. someone needs. well, i'm trying to be more reasonable. but the universe of sergey lukyanenko is being launched in many formats. i would call it in the creative industries, we
5:49 am
call creative and interpret creative. how do you feel about the discussion that we do not have good scripts. we don't have good uh lyrics. we don't have good writers, we don't have anything and films. we don't have good ones either. we don't, but let's say this must be divided. we have a lot of good fantasy. we have a lot of good stories we have , er, after all. uh, a lot of things, but we really have a problem with the writers. the only thing i can say is that it's a problem. in fact, it's happening all over the world right now. uh, i think a lot of the problem is because movies are now produced by producers. eh, on the one hand. this is understandable, the producer gives money. he doesn't want to take risks. uh, on the other hand, the screenwriter wrote the text, the script, like everyone says, well, then the producer comes, says, yes everything is great. only now, you know , add a girl here, here is a fight, and then
5:50 am
put a corpse. well the screenwriter is starting to pry on himself. curls adds a girl here. this is where the fight started. then the director comes and says, no, we need to redo it a little. you know, in such and such a film it was very good and adds something else, and as a result , a film appears. filmed not according to the script written by the screenwriter, but just such an attraction as a prefabricated structure, i am in one scenario, when i was very tormented, i say, here you need some bright unusual spectacle, and the action took place in a medieval city. and i wrote saying in the background there is a large procession of dwarfs, some swallowers, juggling with multi-colored maces. and just like that, things like this began to be inserted, it was filmed. no, it hasn't been filmed. unfortunately. this was an important podcast for the creative industry, and in the studio, roman
5:51 am
pockets and elena are our guests. uh, the great soviet, writer, russian science fiction, yes , i watched the american tv series , which means somehow, uh, and there was such a plot, and a person who thinks he is talented or not, talented he has the ability to take a pill. and if he is really a talented talent, or his talent is revealed, he begins to write with terrible force. and if not , a talented one turns into a vampire into a zombie and begins to walk around and eat people, so at the dawn of your activities. uh, when you realized that you can generally eat a pill already, but in fact, uh, a writer, when he even wrote his first story. he must be generally sure that he is a genius. eh, at least potentially. uh, here, without this, you can't do this job without this, because you look on the shelf of bookstores and you become. bad and you think what i'm
5:52 am
doing and why am i writing something else? he has already written a lot, but in a good way, probably, it was a book atomic dream. i have such an old, old story completely written, in my opinion, about 20 years old. and when i wrote it, i suddenly realized that it was more. well , i realized that i was succeeding and somehow noted this for myself. so happy and then there were several other such works. there were autumn visits, after which i realized that i had written a good novel, and there was spectrum and a few more books. that is, every time. so , at a certain stage, you write a book and think. i'm done. i took some peak for myself and you can eat the pill again. and now young people are asking you how to make money. well, they ask, of course, they ask, because this is a scheme when a person works all day, and in the evening he sits and
5:53 am
writes something. well, she's still young. maybe e ride. and when a person is already 30-40 years old, then in the evening you still want to relax a little, and not do a second job of writing. this is also work. and now i just advise everyone and say, go and engage in electronic publications, because young people now love it very much. e, such a reading format as e reading from a tablet from a phone and so on, there are a lot of sites. uh, where authors exhibit like this and, uh, where people pay. well, a person announces a subscription, says, here i am writing a novel. here you can ask for three chapters for free. if you like it there for 50 rub. you will read to the end there or at the table, who evaluates their work as a result, and as a result, some authors become super popular earn big, really big money, but there is another
5:54 am
danger here, because reading or he is a person who wants to get something all the time that he already liked. and so the young, the author wrote his novel, everyone screamed there. hurray man, suddenly earned. i thought it was 20 years old, he wrote a book and earned there in a couple of months more than his dad earns in a year. his eyes are on fire. he is screaming. now i will write a new book, the reader, screaming, no, we like it. write a sequel to the person already. strictly speaking, there are no ideas for a continuation, but it is necessary. he sits down to write a second book. so now i'm writing a new one. no , he writes the third. then he says to himself. no, i'll write a new one. i'm a writer, he writes a completely new story and all his faithful readers. they say fu is not at all what we wanted and he sees that he has a financial failure and as a result a person begins to earn a young author, but he is forced work. that's purely by order of the public. you always write what you feel, want
5:55 am
what torments you almost always. i tried a couple of times, uh, to work, let's say, on order. uh, usually it was related to some kind of computer games, that is. people create a computer game, it is interesting and they have an idea. but if a famous writer writes, uh, a novel about our computer game, then it will become even more popular. yes, it basically works. uh, but when you write a novel like this, to order, you've been persuaded to be motivated. you sit and write but do you feel that you are, in general, still doing it? uh, not what he wanted, this is a very unpleasant feeling. i've uh written books like this a couple of times. uh, well, don't really want to repeat eating the recipe. how many hours a day do you need, but enter the invest. well, there is, uh, such a good rule to write, at least a little every day. that's at least
5:56 am
half a page at least a page. eh, to be honest , even if a person writes the page. uh, every day one page of computer text there. over there, yes, then he will write a couple of novels in a year uh-huh forbade adaptations of several of his works not only for adaptations for theater productions. uh, they were related to the fact that children are just like in american schools. uh, over the past 10 years, these cases have been repeated. uh, murder was committed with children, and he forbade it. he categorically did not give anyone permission. and you have such, perhaps not. i know what it's about. uh, king has several stories about teenagers who organized a school shooting there and, to be honest, i didn’t write such things, yes, and in general these books. i think that king's is not the best, but let's get back to the industry, after all , yes, uh, indeed, the industry, the western one , for some time, captured our market on
5:57 am
quite obviously. now it has partly receded, but it has rushed along with the interest of our citizens too. that is, they continue to look for western western, western tv series, films and so on. they asked us to make some extra effort to return this attention to the inside of the country, to our native soil, to our science fiction, our series and our movie and so on. it seems to me that any such film production, production of games , production of quality music. this is , in fact, also a production. this is a product that you can sell to earn. uh, at worst, money. they just stayed inside the country, and at best it is also an export product. that is, uh, supports at least already, starting from this actually in the same serial and production. it seems to me that we have already reached quite a decent parity not everywhere, we are pulling out in terms of
5:58 am
special effects and technology. it's clear because it adds up to less than the sum, but in terms of the acting of the actors in the plot of e, we are already fully drawing out and there are a number of projects. again, i will not name, who are watching with delight, and they are ahead of, uh , some western counterparts, but if we continue the topic, then go to foreign territories with our films and our meanings with our books. as far as this is also necessary and there is and with what, well, it seems to me that there is something i can say, let's say about myself. i don't know now i think less will be published in europe, uh, but on in fact, they are publishing now and there is still a proposal and everything is moving very actively to the east. eh, china is there and there is a lot of interest. there is an interest in our culture. in general, it has traditionally been preserved. and you can go there
5:59 am
, you have to go. i'm getting out. there's now book after book in china. oh, well, now we have box office receipts, if we talk about our films. uh, very high, just literally these two months of release. which ok i mean until the box office, but do we have some good news? uh, next new year's, apparently all the same, it will, uh, be accompanied by an exit. eh, a large number of premiers and will lie, actually called, i think, i think, yes, i think, yes, i'm saying again, i judge by myself by the number of projects that i directly or indirectly participate in. uh, projects price, well, film projects, television scripts, sale of book rights. i see that we are very active here. now here is a spread on their authors and domestic production.

13 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on