the child in the other hand is a stroller, when i saw vika lowering at that moment, she was just 3 months old when his child was abused. my heart bled , that is, there is a stroller, here from the second floor it is like this, there is a child just like this, it looks like there is some kind of doll lying there. right here in general. well, you know, it's hard to blame her for that, no matter how monstrous it sounds now. she doesn’t know, doesn’t have and doesn’t want to learn more, and she didn’t even have a doll with a stroller, what can i say, everything the card is in your hands, all the chances are on your side, the hindrance that arose with this not quite healthy woman in the prosecutor's uniform. i think it will be eliminated, because otherwise i don’t understand at all why the prosecutor’s office? why court? why guardianship authorities, if i can not protect one little defenseless person who is now living well, or maybe living in hell. for my part, i

promise you that help is needed. we will come, because for me this is everything that happened in this studio today in relation to your girl monstrously unfair. honestly. please help me get my blood back. and i almost replaced his mother. and where is the second grandmother? why did you decide that he felt bad there grandfather? he says he hit me straight with his fist. i won't let you take my baby from me. he did not want to work, they make moonshine. and you don’t beat, you don’t walk with men. i don’t beat you, in general, how much did i forgive you? well done, you are my daughter at the window, stand. do you want to grow perchagu now ? your son better you don't scare come up with came here with peacekeeping. let's call.

good afternoon on the air is a big game today is the anniversary of bloody sunday, but this is not the bloody sunday that happened in russia in 1905, and even more so, the bloody july 11 , the forty-third year , the volyn massacre reached its climax, this mass destruction by bandera from the aun-pa polyakov in western ukraine, bandera non-humans knew that on sundays the inhabitants of polish villages gathered in churches and on that day they simply moved from one village to another and they killed everyone head by head in july forty -three alone, more than 10,000 poles were killed . and in total, during the volyn massacre, about 60,000. and today the leaders. upa. e, shushkevich’s nicknames, by the way, commanded this volyn izya, they

are heroes glorified by the current ukrainian nazi government, and the official motto, upa, became the official motto of the armed forces of ukraine and the kiev regime as a whole. which, of course, is another reminder. why is one of the most important goals of the russian special military operation is the denocification of ukraine and why this goal should be fulfilled in full by the west, including poland, supporting the current ukrainian government. just gives the memory of those 60.000. uh, the killed poles well, let's now talk about how the special military operation continues with the russian one. what is happening on the fronts, and in these minutes, uh, and our traditional military observer boris alexandrovich rozhin is in touch. good afternoon boris alexandrovich . and good afternoon to you. indeed, they are against the backdrop of the donation itself, on which ukraine was not able to show any public results, the enemy continued attacks in the zaporozhye direction, not on one

of the key sections of the significant sites. they reached no e, in the area of ​​​​work on it in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bfive-hats, not on a temporary ledge of some significant movement. no losses, he suffers large losses over the past 24 hours, at least three leopards eight bradleys have been destroyed, and not counting other various soviet and nato equipment. and the same thing happens, uh, and in area, nu ugledar and avdiivka, where the enemy is making attacks. does everyone have a stabilization of their position. this is especially true for avdiivka, our troops have now taken under fire control the orlov orlovka route , shishkin’s flippers in kievka, that the problem for the enemy grouping of our troops counterattacked at the water and knocked the enemy out of one of the key landings, and here the installation for the enemy developed under a small one. no change, but in the artyomovsk direction , the enemy continued to attack. uh, when such is still such fat tails at the ticker verkhovka, uh, significant results,

our position is not being held, but the enemy. it also suffers very heavy losses there, especially in equipment, including in western a in the northern direction, and the enemy has already completely stopped attacks in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bthe blowout and has now transferred forces to the north of the red estuary, where rostov is not developing in the best way for him, because today, our troops have reached the outskirts of the village of torskoye and, according to a number of reports, they have already entered the fighting here. in the village itself from torsky to the red estuary, 14 km in a straight line, so the enemy is transferring his reserves here. also, our troops are advancing. e, in the area of ​​\u200b\u200be, kuzemovka and in the novoselovsky area. our troops are also afraid of the village there, and the student reserve brigade, one of the forty-first, has now been transferred by the enemy to the kupyansk region, because the situation there is also complicated for him by forces. there he suffered losses and , accordingly , it becomes more difficult to hold the front near the bruise and the two-river, therefore, part

of the reserve, which should have attacked the request in that direction, they are now are used under kupyansk in the whole physical situation, then we will start the direction of introducing offensive operations, and in others we successfully hold back the enemy’s offensive, which does not allow him to show results before the nato summit thank you very much boris alexandrovich keep us informed. well, indeed, the fact that the vsu could not achieve any serious success, but the donations themselves and that in the 5th week the ukrainian counteroffensive did not bring any serious results at all , causes very great concern in the west and definitely. uh, one of today's topics in vilnius is debriefing. why did n’t the armed forces of ukraine, which have been preparing for this offensive since the end of last year , achieved anything and what should be done now? in the current and in the current situation, the west, let me remind you, put a very high stake on this counteroffensive and on the military conflict in general, about how high the stake is

, recently in his washington post article recalled former united states secretary of state stephen bigan and former speechwriter. e president bush jr. marx. hear what they wrote. perhaps our soldiers are not fighting in this war, but make no mistake, this is our war, if ukraine loses this war, then it will be america's defeat, if it wins, then it will be america's victory as a consequence of both victory and biden. at the same time, czech president petr pavel e, today, at the nato summit, said that i quote the window of opportunity for ukraine to achieve a military result at the front will more or less close by the end of this year. and after that willingness, and the west mass support of ukraine with a large number of weapons will decline. and, of course, in this situation. the west is desperately throwing more and more packages of weapons to ukraine. today, france announced that it is transferring 50 long-range scalp missiles to kiev, these are air-launched missiles with a range of about 250

km. this is an analogue of the british storm shadow germany today announced a new package for 700 million euros. where will two more missiles go? ah, 25 leopard tanks and 40 marder infantry fighting vehicles. well, the united states last week announced the transfer of cluster munitions to the kiev regime, explaining that other munitions are not cluster conventional munitions. the united states no longer has it, and today the nato secretary general from toltenberg said that indeed, as if confirming this american rhetoric about the depletion of conventional ammunition, he said that ukraine faced the threat of depletion of ammunition already in the short term, because the costs are very high , and military production in the west. just can't handle with assigned tasks. listen to what the table has to say. i think we all need to understand that this war already a few months ago

turned into a war of attrition and battles. logistics ukraine needs supplies of ammunition and spare parts and fuel on a huge scale, but the problem is that from the very beginning and from the moment of production. we did not have large stocks and production did not immediately become large scale. first, the war must take some time to earn all production facilities. now in front of us worth the challenge. ukraine is facing a shortage of ammunition, so we need to do everything possible to supply them with as many shells as possible. and at the same time, as he writes. uh, the bloomberg edition at least in europe , the military industry still does not show any serious expansion. and when this expansion happens unknown, at least they write that and say that it will not happen soon, look, before we had a temporary lack of money. today we have money but no time to talk to tommy gustav son rasko, head of bi system with haglands, reflecting the general mood among the european defense industry nearly a year and a half after the start of the war in ukraine

, european defense contractors, inundated with requests for everything from ammunition to portable missile combat vehicles, are faced with a dilemma. will they bet on expanding production, assuming the war and tensions with russia will go on indefinitely, or hold back until they have a long-term commitment from governments that the last few decades have cut or even slashed their defense budgets. andrew france here in this regard. and how long will the west be able to maintain the current military spending and maintain the current intensity of military assistance. but is it possible that they are now many months old. and maybe years until the west, nevertheless, the volume of military production will expand and will supply so much. cluster munitions only and for how long, respectively, can cluster munitions be supplied. here's how you rate the potential of the west in part, and the military supply of ukraine in fact. the west, as it turned out, was not ready for a war of such high

intensity. we have different systems for our industrial complex heritage of the soviet union in most of the state and we mothballed special defense plants that allow us to quickly produce and establish mass production of artillery shells, some kind of cartridge systems and everything else in the west for the wartime period. private business. they do not keep such productions. and most most importantly bloomers. it is well painted here why they do not want to build up? they came and said you want us to invest billions in the low-margin production of artillery shells, where the profit is minimal, when we earned almost 200-300% on tanks and aircraft. then pay us, please, because we don't know what this conflict will be. finish, and we have invested billions in production in nato , no one understands how long this conflict will be. everyone looks at the united states and cannot understand whether they want to continue it for a long time or finishes tomorrow for some reason.

they see that the americans are wearing down european industry and destroying, including the defense industry, forcing them to supply their advanced means to the detriment of their national interests in exchange for american weapons, so the conflict that arises there and the fact that the americans are now supplying cluster munitions. this is actually an indicator of the weakness of a certain biden. called it a transitional period in a cnn interview. and how when they can force the defense budget when european countries to reach full capacity and , relatively speaking, cut their things the germans, and so already 500-500 families have cut social benefits for children, further this situation will be like in france, just here people on the street. well, you correctly noted another split that has now emerged within nato. whose is it for? supplies and on whose military industry to spend money, indeed , there is a dispute in europe, and the poles are the balts. uh, they say that you need to buy american weapons and military equipment, while france, after all,

at least at the level of rhetoric, it says that money needs to be invested within the european union and to support our defense industry, as if agreement on this issue, no, well, in principle, i want to say that today's nato summit has brought out very serious deep splits between a-a the united states and some of their satellites, uh between european countries, and the external split is about what policy to pursue regarding ukraine provide an invitation to start up with an open date, but, nevertheless, fix that ukraine's place in nato and ukraine should be admitted to nato, or even now, in the course of a military conflict, there are also such madmen. there is either, at least after the end of the military conflict, and now great britain, france, also adjoins this group, and on the other hand, there are the united states and germany, which categorically refuse to take on any obligations regarding the admission of ukraine to nato and say that

that it is necessary to get rid of the so-called israeli model, about which we will talk in more detail today, but here, as the financial edition writes. times behind this behind this, as it were, an external split over ukraine lurks a deeper split over russia , because what should be the strategic goal, and the west in relation to russia, and what tools are appropriate and inappropriate to use to achieve this strategic goal, listen . that the goal should be a complete victory of ukraine a humiliating defeat of russia they think that the only way to ensure peace is to break russian power then to accept ukraine into nato the us government of germany is more careful, both in terms of the goals of the war and in terms of securing peace. one senior german diplomat admits that behind poland's talk about the need to completely defeat vladimir putin lies the hope that russia may eventually break up . according to him, this idea, in which berlin is not

interested, some us officials are also worried that a number of allies, on in fact, they would like nato to be directly involved in a war with russia, if they want it, they should declare it openly, one high-ranking politician from washington says this because this is not our policy aleksandra mikhailovich, well, it turns out that in the west with one on the other hand, there is a group of madmen who believe that russia can disintegrate and for this it would not hurt to draw russia into a direct military clash with nato yes, there is a group of cynics who believe that no, no, we don’t need a hot war with a nuclear superpower, but let's continue the endless proxy war in order to eventually weaken russia. and these are all the only two opinions, if you believe, er, finan shield times and apparently. so it is. you agree and what we should not do in this regard. well, i think as far as the collapse of russia is concerned, naturally those who profess this point of view openly about it. they say this is a manifestation of such russophobic fanaticism.

that is, people don’t believe in it for a long time, but they want it to be so, as far as the position is concerned washington and berlin i think they are more sober about things. then they realize that, roughly speaking, they got into this protracted conflict that the calculation was close. and if in the summer, they said that it was necessary for ukraine to win on the battlefield, then they simply began to forget about it. i think now there will be accusations that are already pouring in. and on the other side. well, i think that the americans and the same germans, they can talk among themselves that the material turned out to be unusable, that is, ukrainian, which is not a horse fodder, roughly speaking, and they blame that they were not given enough weapons, but i think that the fundamental one has already been said here, the fundamental miscalculation was that it was not necessary to start everything, this is a ukrainian mess. not being ready for a big war

in europe as it happened, hence the problems of industrial defense, because even if they produce shells for a big war in europe, there is still no political will, as it were. well, the mood of the public lead. here is such a war with russia, therefore, they really ended up in some kind of multifaceted color note. i would also add that this is a kind of sukvant, because you have to kind of continue. salad uh-huh but every step he corners. that is, he, firstly, limits the freedom of maneuver, he encourages you to take the next step in the direction. just all the goals, er, well, that they would not want to confess, namely the issue of nuclear escalation. the fact that nato one way or another, let it be through a coalition of those who wish or simply bilateral agreements between kiev and certain countries.

uh, it will have to be drawn into the conflict , and then we just now we are already saying that nato is a participant in the conflict, and directly, because they provide the same strategic depth even in a geographical sense that russia has . well, i completely agree with you that ukraine is turning into a liability , and not actively, of western politics, but at the same time, it is unlikely that the current political elites in the united states, and, especially in europe , will agree to change. the very strategy aimed at trying to russia weaken as much as possible and inflict a strategic defeat. after all, ukraine is not the only one that is important, but it is not the only tool in that hybrid war that the west is waging against russia and they may have madmen, they may have cynics, but both of them want to continue the war against russia. it's just that some allow, even a hot war, others want this war to be preserved in a hybrid form. even after the ukrainian conflict. well

, here's some systemic policy to weaken russia and politicians, or at least potential leaders who could fundamentally change uh, the strategy of the west and accept russia as an equal uh partner and one of the centers of a multipolar world, but not in the united states. or maybe someday they will appear in the rotation process? elite but so far they are not there and, accordingly , so far in the west, eh. some potential about the possibility of rebuilding a partnership, uh, with someone in the west. it seems to me that it is not necessary, and in this situation, russia needs to strengthen its relations with real russian strategic partners with the countries of the world majority and of course the main partner of russia and within the world majority is china and uh, today, uh, the second day has ended. e visit of the delegation

of the federal assembly of russia to beijing a. and for e dialogue with the entire chinese people's congress, our delegation is headed by valentina ivanovna matviyenko, and this delegation includes e, the leader of the big game. deputy chairman of the committee on international affairs of the state duma vyacheslav alekseevich nikonov, who, among other things , met yesterday with depin, within the framework. and today i hosted this general meeting. active participation in the second day of the visit vyacheslav alekseevich good afternoon, once again we are very glad to see you on the air of a big game as an expert. tell us about the results of the second day. as i understand it, this is the last such full-fledged day of the visit of the delegation of the federal assembly. in general, what are the results of this visit, and perhaps it is possible to sum it up? well, strategic depth since you

're talking about it. of course she's here you know where i came from now on the air. e from the bolshoi theater and what was there e evening of tchaikovsky well , it was true that the beijing symphony orchestra performed. it was the first concerto for piano and orchestra. it was the 1812 overture. it was, of course, swan eve, eugene onegin's polonaise, it was amazing and it was not for our arrival. it was a tchaikovsky evening at the beijing bolshoi theater that says a lot, huh? when are they waiting for putin uh, china uh, do they think that the summit will take place in october? uh, when our president comes here for a meeting in one belt one road is a large global infrastructure project promoted by china a.

as for the possibility of a face-to-face meeting in the e format, the brix summit of south africa, the chinese country is silent about this so far, but at the same time it does not hide that it supports the russian position on the issue of expanding the brix, they are also in favor of expanding here, we have a common position, what can we say about the common currency , while china has not clearly formulated its position, eh, legislators. uh, concentrated on their practical activities of the legislative exchange was experience. in terms of this legislation , which is now becoming more and more relevant in our country, for example, legislation on foreign agents , legislation on countering foreign agents, various kinds of sanctions, e, legislation aimed at creating a sovereign internet space. well, and so on. now we have many of the same similar. uh problem, because and similar challenges. uh, a lot of attention, of course,

to the interregional partnership from the chinese side was attended by representatives of all provinces that border russia and , accordingly, representatives of our regions that border china, they have a lot of e and fruitful. uh, very far-reaching programs. uh, the economic partnership is growing, and really exponentially. e in the border areas and now er, today there are 157 partnerships between the cities of the provinces of china and russia, and this number is constantly increasing. well, we discussed it, of course. uh, the results of janet yelen's visit here. e relations with the united states of america but e experts. uh, our chinese colleagues. they say that now e us-china relations. they are developing in some waves , in which waves are fading right now a big splash , fading wave in connection with elena's visit

, we note that xi jinping did not receive the minister of finance in the united states, but our delegation was accepted, he says. eh, a lot, but agreed. eh, they even came up with this one. uh, the new term is that they won't uh disengagement, but they will uh be so uh, deconflicted. that is, uh, they will try to avoid conflicts, they will not hit the squares will not use economic weapons of mass destruction, but sanctions. uh, the united states will continue to ask, the only chinese side, that retaliatory sanctions should not be comprehensive, destroying the american economy, and the chinese can certainly do this, well, in general terms, the meetings are very correct, and they defined the american approach . or the american approach, they really want a controlled confrontation

, stabilization, a confrontation with china without changing their own policies. yes and the united states will pursue, and the containment of china in the technological high-tech areas. uh, but with uh, they will restrain china in the military-political sphere in the international political sphere, but at the same time they don’t want china to give any answer, and this one, and this phenomenon of controlled confrontation is what biden is in offered his time to vladimir putin at the summit. in geneva, too, without changing, at the same time, in any way , the american policy towards ukraine and do we remember what this led to? that is, it is not working model. and since the united states does not want to eliminate the root causes of the conflicts, and russian-chinese relations are independent, but at the same time, uh, we have a common enemy, the united states.

uh, with china, this is the united states, and today in vilnius, the nato summit opened and agent stoneberg once again stated that china is also a threat to the north atlantic alliance, and uh, the leaders of the four pacific countries, including including japan e, south korea australia and e new zeeland and which, let's say , have a difficult relationship with china. has this topic been discussed today? this topic was discussed and yesterday it was discussed, uh, in communication with the top officials of china. today i am with our colleagues parliamentarians, but uh, australia new zealand uh for the chinese, their position is more or less clear and familiar, as for south korea and japan, of course , their rapprochement with nato is unpleasant news for beijing, they do not hide their extremely negative attitude towards such a development of events, but naturally, as they repeated to us

repeatedly chinese. hey, our comrades. eh, they're not afraid. er, they are not afraid, because they feel their strength, their strength, their ability to resist, but any real challenge that may be in the region. but the fact that the americans are now clearly adding fuel to the fire, er, smoldering conflicts, is in this asian ocean region. this irritates the chinese. well, uh, i think we can actually welcome it to some extent, because the result will certainly be a strengthening of our interactions. uh, as i said yesterday , i did not hear such harsh statements about the policy of the west that we heard from the first persons in china. eh, never from them. i fully agree with you. vyacheslav alekseevich actually. your visit a ​​visit by your delegation. to beijing, just and confirms, but the fortress a and the stability of e and the great

prospects of the russian chinese strategic partnership. thank you very much for taking the time. e for breaking away from the beautiful opera. uh, in beijing thank you very much. and now we're going to break. i don't came off. i did not come off perfectly everything ended. yes, i congratulate you on the pleasure you received today. listening to tchaikovsky, we will now break for a short advertisement later. i prepared a surprise for the fiftieth anniversary of the legendary film, which is about 7 o'clock, or rather, your clock is behind again, some other insidious touch, when all this should happen soon. crazy very interesting

chief here do not rush. please help need chain need wind, only need

wind. kvass ochakovsky refreshes and inspires. every day solution from vtb is to please your loved ones with convenient and fast transfers in russia and more than 10 countries of the world. get a free debit card for life vtb yourself pay ozon cards to banks pay up to twenty-

five percent. open for free in the app. the most delicate vampire, chocolate, sun, sugar, no, sugar tube from a pure line, the perfect combination of ice cream wafers and chocolate, pure line, please your and close taste buds. 1tv presents in a pumpkin i'm personally here

get away with your reputation your years, i still like you, bloodhound you will come home today. the bear is waiting for you. cinema one tv presents you a card you want?

thank you big game western propaganda constantly claims that the expansion of nato, whether it be to poland, to the baltic countries or to ukraine, occurs exclusively because the countries of central eastern europe and

the post-soviet space are desperately knocking on nato doors and the united states they say only react to external impulses. this is an absolute lie and uh, uh, having studied recently declassified american documents johns hopkins university professor maurice is born, but writes that it was the united states that raised the issue of ukraine's accession to nato and you know, when not in 2008 in 1994, the bill clinton administration, when the general decision to expand nato was actually made look, on october 13 , 1994, us national security adviser anthony lake wrote to president bill clinton, and clinton drew two vertical lines about the possibility of ukraine joining nato in the baltic states. near with the recommendation not to close the door to nato for ukraine, the baltics, romania and bulgaria , washington should not have simply sent these

countries into the gray zone or into the russian sphere of influence, clinton put a big tick. on the title page of the recommendation like and wrote looks good. that is, already then the united states planned to expand its zone of influence up to the russian borders , in fact, and deprive russia of space. e security forced to bring her to her knees, and er, deprive her of any freedom of maneuver in the field of security. well, then already as we all know perfectly well in 2008 at the nato summit in bucharest and already the bush jr. administration, but demanded that ukraine and georgia be given an action plan for a nato member, it was then. right now, at the vilnius nato summit, the situation has changed, it is the united states, as well as those who joined them in germany, who are firmly blocking any wording of any obligations, not only on inviting ukraine to nato even with an open date, but even providing it with a guarantee

of security in the classical sense, that is obligations to enter the war in case it will be on it. an attack was made, and instead of these guarantees, instead of promises to join nato, the united states offers the kiev regime the so-called israeli model , which has been written about for a long time . on cnn, biden himself used the word israeli, model. well, here's what let's remember. what is the israeli model? instead of insist on ukraine's entry into nato the us is looking for alternative forms for it, security guarantees are proposed to establish a unique military partnership with ukraine that involves the transfer of high-tech weapons and intensive cooperation between the military. ukrainians would become a close ally of america equipped with the most modern military equipment, including such controversial

weapons as cluster munitions, but it is important to note that, like israel, ukraine initially. would not fall under the fifth article, the nato charter guaranteeing security. why do you think the united states has so, uh, changed its mind to the opposite. and in general, does this apply to the israeli model? we all know. what place does israel occupy with the security system in the middle east , is this model applicable to ukraine well, first it is its own, when it became clear that providing ukraine, uh, security guarantees entails ? the real possibility of conflict with russia uh, the question uh for the united states has become a completely different vein. a direct clash with russia was never in their plans at the same time. uh, there is a very great fear of, uh, the collapse of the nato guarantee system in situations where russia does something, and the united states cannot respond at the proper level, the question

of redistributing resources between the european and pacific theaters of military operations arises, hence the reasoning about the israeli model. they are demagogic in nature, they are talking about some new model that has nothing to do with israel maybe it is closer to the afghan model the fact is that israel is a country with a functioning economy and political system and industry and so on and its own armed forces. it basically contains itself. eh, there he has a significant military budget of more than 20 billion dollars, he receives about 3.5 billion dollars in aid there, but he builds his military power with his own efforts and, by virtue of this, is carried out. in fact, politics, based on everything that we know about ukraine, they have already lost under 40% of gdp, which they had not outstanding at all from what they have

left probably a third-it's just a product of military spending. that is, there is practically no economy left, respectively. this is the future ukrainian military detergent. just like in the afghan regime of the president, drive a fine, it will be 80-100% contained there, armed and, accordingly , controlled by the americans. accordingly, it will be just their tool. again, if israel pursues a policy based on national interests and, for example, did not support sanctions against russia, then here we have extremely dangerous situation such a country is a tool that can be sent anywhere bombs will fall on its territory. but this will not be of particular interest to anyone. this is a recipe for future conflict. here i am sometimes surprised . even american arrogant myopia is amazing, because scattering for 30 years has been talking. and that she is categorically

against the expansion of nato considers ukraine's entry into nato as an existential threat, but in the ninety -fourth and in 2008 the united states believed that you know everything so, uh, sort of uh a figure of speech that russia will not dare to take any serious steps, that russia will accept submission? the situation with respect to the west will kneel, will somehow be attached. so , on a side chair to the system of american hegemony, and that's all. but now, when russia , with arms in hand, really defends its national interests, the situation is. it changed immediately and the united states no longer considers that the threat of war is completely excluded. i mean world war. e wars with another great power and when the threat with another great power is real. they no longer dare to make any serious commitments. and as you quite correctly answered, they use ukraine as consumables

and tools. and we are seeing this, we are observing this just from the results of the decision already being made at today's summit in vilnius, spiegel has already published a fragment from nato's statement on ukraine, there are no specifics on inviting ukraine to nato , it says that we are ready to send an invitation to ukraine if all allies agree that the conditions will be met, then there are conditions to be met. this has already aroused the indignation of zelensky who, along the way, vilnius announced the following to listen. now, on the way to vilnius, we received signals that the wording without ukraine is being discussed, which is unprecedented and absurd, when there are no time frames for both inviting and for ukraine's membership, and when some strange wording is added about the conditions even for inviting ukraine it seems that there is no readiness not to invite ukraine in natu does not make it a member of the alliance. therefore, it remains

the opportunity to bargain ukraine's membership in nato in negotiations with russia and for russia this means motivation to continue its terror uncertainty is a weakness and frankly i serve it at the summit. well , zelensky apparently forgot that the decision is not made by him, but the decision is made by the united states and nato, and they have already made a decision. by the way, the politician writes that this statement of his has already caused irritation among western diplomats, who believe that they anonymously told zelensky's publication that what is the publication of politics, that zelensky goes too far. so who is he to present any kind of nato, so to speak. uh, the requirements, so the decision has already been made, the decision has been made without him, and the decision on ukraine, they are, but in fact the three are one, yes, three are the three main decisions. the first renaming of the commission council, nato council ukraine, nato ukraine, the second refusal of the map procedure for the nato membership action plan for ukraine if

a decision is ever made to invite it to nato and, uh, the third one itself. this the obligation to provide ukraine with a multi-year plan of military assistance, which is designed both for the course of the military conflict and for after its completion, and the obligation to provide ukraine with weapons of military equipment to train their soldiers. eh, to share intelligence information to translate everything into nato, rails, and so on sergey sergeevich well, you agree that the first of these two decisions, about which the table announced, for example, this is just an empty shell. what about? thirdly, it just proves that ukraine is nothing more than consumable. we often talk about what ukraine is for the modern world. after all , we always understand that the united states of america acts either value-wise or procedurally. and so now they operate procedurally. they went through the procedure , they are well aware that this is a change material that is needed today. tomorrow. you can choose at

one time there was such a strop politician, he once said that russia cannot have a zone of responsibility. i'll just remind you that it was the first secretary of state's castle during the bill clinton administration and it was his a classmate and lived with him even in the same hostel was his close friend and ardently supported the expansion over so and now, just ptal it would be absolutely right. he was the man who believed that russia she was so toothy that even if the closest neighbors join nato, nothing would happen. he said it in ninety-four. he spoke in the ninety-sixth year onwards, respectively. we remember how all events unfolded today. the day the ukrainian model, it will really follow some kind of adjacent model between afghanistan. i agree with our colleague and yet the israeli model separately. huge help in cybersecurity is being discussed right now. and the money that is invested in cybersecurity. they are high, but the united states of america has finally realized for themselves that their strategy does not include the concept of a direct confrontation with

russia, and yes, today, not european colleagues in nato, not the united states of america, they are not ready to switch to a military economy. we all understand very well, in order to create now a very powerful fist, including the creation of production and industry, it is necessary to create factories that produce factories, it is necessary to switch to three-year or five-year plans in order to create a huge amount of weapons. this weapon should be at least planned for 20-25 years . today, no one from russia has a damper for merchants. there is no way to get a guarantee for 20-25 years that their production will be loaded. therefore, in any case, we perfectly understand. the low current conflict is a victory for the nato country uh-huh you are absolutely right when you say yes, but you can remove certain restrictions, perhaps someday in a, a country like ukraine will exist and maybe even join nato, but the problem is not that it will ever join nato, but what is the price there will be an entry into this, what will remain of ukraine and, of course, we

are well aware that it is necessary to distinguish between the interests of the united states of america and europe , they are not united, but you understand to be and seem - these are different stories today. america says the western world is one as never, but does not represent the majority already too many may shout. but kelo missed and akella missed not the first, not the second, and not even the tenth time, with a good game, with a very, very bad game , it’s hard to keep a good minus and yes, you need to understand one simple thing in order to build up the military power of ukraine now, you need to at least pour not less than 50 billion dollars 50 billion dollars is a lot of money and american economists are talking about this and they say that there is simply no such money, neither europe has america and a very important factor the fact is that when the real election race comes in the united states of america, it will be necessary to prove to almost everyone to their voters what the money was spent on, how effective it was spent, and yes, what is happening with these counter offensives . you wanted to buy it? show the result. well, here's the decision today's

decision regarding ukraine it seems to me. uh, i illustrate very clearly that the west says to the kiev regime you are a tool. you are our tool the fight against russia is even an important weapon in the fight against russia, but you are not one of us, of course, and one of the nato countries at the same time is turkey , which masterfully uses its participation in the north atlantic alliance for and you trade. uh, their bonuses. yes, uh to promote their national interests and one of the important one of today's news itself. this one is a bargain. which erdogan concluded with biden and the president of the united states on the issue of sweden joining nato yes despite all the burning of the koran a late yesterday e secretary general stoltenberg said that an agreement was reached with erdogan that sweden would soon join nato a and uh, cnn turk says that this

turkish parliament can hold a corresponding vote even next week. what is this deal? i think the washington post is very accurate. listen behind all of erdogan's public bluster has long been his most important request, he needs the united states to sell him f-16 fighter jets. now desperately needing modernization of its air force fleet. ankara has filed a formal request to buy new f-16s and modernize eighty aircraft from its existing fleet , the baidan administration has long advocated for this deal, but congress blocked it over the weekend, the white house made progress. in the convictions of the leaders of congresses. in particular, the chairmen of the senate foreign relations committee. robert mendes that it is better to leave turkey in the nato camp by allowing erdogan to sell to achieve some concessions from europe as part of the agreement, sweden agreed to support the expansion of the free trade agreement with turkey, given

washington's behind-the-scenes lobbying, it is clear that other eu members are open to negotiations. well, indeed, immediately after stoltenberg's yesterday's statement, biden announced that he welcomes turkey's decision and intends to work with ankara on building defense in the euro. bows, and the state department clarified that the united states supported the provision of fighter jets to turkey f-16 and supports the desire of ankara to enter into e. european union alexander mikhailovich, you are an experienced diplomat, and you are an extremely and plenipotentiary ambassador from a diplomatic point of view. how do you evaluate this game, erdogan and most importantly, those norms and values ​​​​that the west constantly tells us about well, it seems to me that you can just be happy for erdogan, because he rules politics, when nato is for turkey, they are turkey for us, that is, well , in fact, the very existence of alliances, and everything that is happening in the european

policy will be nato will be the european union and a member. indeed, at one time, double expansion, and it assumed that first they were admitted to nato and then to the european union, because the european union brought tangible economic benefits, therefore. in turkey, it’s like she’s already in nato and all that’s left is to get into the european union, whether she gets into the eu or not, it doesn’t matter, but i would say, such a thing that well, if we return to that topic, uh, alliances and its solution, in fact . there are two moments typical of americans. this is strategizing for any status quo. here they came up with the israeli version and we decided that this is, in general, some kind of fiction, in fact, we are talking about the continuation of the policy that has already been carried out for eight years, that is, pumping weapons into the informal membership of nato. yes, among the americans. it 's called hmm, kick your foot, like a tin can, that is, you understand the problems.

yes, another administration is also happening. just at the nato level, and why be surprised? personally, i say, i'm glad cheese doug that he's putting nato and the americans in this light. well, he really is. you are absolutely right, but made such a mini revolution within nato because traditionally nato works only on the american agenda , acts to please the united states. and now nato is acting in the interest of erdogan. in addition, he illustrates really. here is the monstrous scale of double standards within the european union , which positions itself as ector's standard, since it means a normative entity that acts only in accordance with erdogan's rules and values. now everyone is called authoritarian leader, especially in the european union, but by the decree of joe biden the european union, agrees to grant a visa-free regime to authoritarian turkey to expand with it and

deepen the free trade area and so on. this is how decisions are made in the collective west. well, another important decision of today's summit, and in this vilnius , is the approval of three military action plans of regional military action plans. and as for their own conduct of a large conflict, primarily with russia and these plans, as jens stoltenberg wrote in their article in forino face relates to the deployment of the armed forces of the nato countries , the creation of the appropriate infrastructure , the command control system and the replenishment of the arsenals of weapons of military equipment. at the same time, it is indicated that at least 300,000 military personnel will be constantly in a state of high combat readiness, but this is not enough for the hosts of the current summit, lithuania, and uh, guitness said today at the beginning of the summit that it demands to abandon any restrictions on creation of permanent nato military bases on the territory of new countries

members, including in the baltic states and e, for this it is necessary to denounce the fundamental acts, russia nato which really forbade e, such a deployment and this fundamental act, according to the opinion, is dead. well, i agree on only one thing, which is the fundamental actor, but here's how you evaluate the adoption of regional plans. e nato in terms of conducting military operations , preparing for military operations. and here it is, uh, initiative we need to prepare for a big war, that is, we need to understand that they are systematically moving towards this, before that we saw that the european peace fund financed the so-called operational mobility in europe, that is, they expanded the tunnels so that heavy american equipment from western ports from germany could cross the whole of europe , they removed administrative barriers that all this equipment was moving, they were preparing to mobilize the european continent for

real confrontation with russia, these are the three plans that they led. this is a throwback to the cold war in 30 years. they didn't do anything like that. they kept them secret. they made three commands that will be everywhere obey the americans, moreover, and some of them will even be outside the european continent, this is in america. but the most important thing is the rapid response troops to nato. this suggests that some of the units of the national troops have been given away, but sovereignty has been lost and they have been given command of nato , and the swedes. entering said. we will give most of the troops there nato command - this is the american command sent by an american general, that is, you need to understand that at any moment these units can withdraw to perform tasks not with uh, coordinate with your nationals, figuratively speaking to the government of the country, and they want to increase this contingent, 7 1/2 times. now they have 40,000 soldiers who want to grow to 300,000 to increase the number of ship aircraft. and most

importantly, move all this infrastructure as close as possible to russia along the border. why do the balts say that we want more , they threaten russia so loudly that they understand that they will not be able to use their national troops, therefore they do not want nato troops to come, but the americans always make a multi-move game. they are not only trying to threaten russia to raise the bar of confrontation, not thereby doing the actual occupation of europe , they are entering with their contingents into those countries that never existed. they, that is, europe will repeat the fate of germany and, therefore, e japan when the occupying troops overwhelmingly exceed the national armed forces. well, for russia, the adoption of these three regional plans for the conduct of hostilities certainly means that nato has embarked on a long-term military course. uh, confrontation with russia is the institutionalization of military confrontation. and for ukraine, i think this is bad news, because everything depends on the implementation of these three regional plans. we need infrastructure.

we need weapons. military equipment is needed, but it is not enough. for some reason, it seems to me that nato will, first of all, supply equipment to themselves, and only then the kiev regime will now be interrupted by a small advertisement, then we will continue. exclusive here is vovan and lexus meeting forums taoist forum, everywhere he is listened to frank conversations with patriarch of world politics henry kinchenger. we invited him to ukraine. he said, yes, next year, who will become the new president of the united states, i am talking to you, as a friend from traffic, there is no strategic pulse, kamalaharis, completely unpredictable, but she could surprise me. why the white house is afraid of russia is only a complete victory they themselves did. so we have no other option, antifake. tomorrow on the first and always on one tv point ru

pay for free in the ozon bank application magnet price, what you need chocolate alyonka 1199 the halva card opens the door to the world of fantastic shopping, even during the period of discounts and sales, any purchases will become even more pleasant with a 10-month installment plan and up to

10% cashback . sergei jewelry sokolov for 499 rubles. sweatshirt skinny for 399 rubles. just get up to 5 million to the branch and an online solution for every day from vtb is to please loved ones with convenient and fast transfers in russia and more than 10 countries around the world. checkout free debit card for life vtb summer with tinkoff mobaev. order a tinkoff sim card and get the most effective protection against spam and scammers. he is such a service profitable to pay. there-there-there-there-there-there, tu-tu-tu there you pay pay cards of azone bank with cashback up to 25% open for free in the ozon bank application. how to apply to

different educational institutions across the country? take advantage of public services here, you can easily create a package of documents, select five universities of interest and send documents to several specialties in each to do the right thing is easier than it seems public services for the digital economy project. tv introduces friends

and where all the workers in this office are here i have to believe that every one of them is a traitor spy, so the employees. better stay away from today. you and the new leaders of intelligence chief of intelligence cinema one tv presents she loves you or the dead, i really love her crawl. your father pyotr danilovich gromov could have killed. river

on the air a big game is another important aspect today's summit in vilnius, and we touched on it a little in our conversation with vyacheslav alekseevich. nikonov is nato's policy towards china and the desire of the united states to ensure a closer connection, closer horizontal integration between the european and asian allies of the united states and to build, thereby such a consolidated united western bloc against russia against china, at the same time,

the leaders of japan, south korea, are present in vilnius australia new zealand the main pacific allies, and the united states, moreover, australia , uh, announced that for the first time, i don’t know, it seems to me since the last world wars, it is recreating its direct permanent military presence in europe and sending its own to germany. and aircraft that will monitor military and humanitarian supplies. let me remind you that last year, and nato adopted a new strategic concept, where it declared that china is a threat to the national security of the country, well, this year, uh, nato has not gone far. here, uh, bring you uh a quote from today's article of the program article for the opening of nato secretary general jens stoltenberg in vilnius. that's what he writes about china when at the beginning of this year? i visited japan and south

korea and their leaders were clearly concerned that what was happening in europe today might be repeated tomorrow. in asia , the chinese government's increasingly hardline foreign policy and domestic repression are challenging security by value and interest. nato beijing threatens its neighbors and intimidates other countries. he tries to take control of the most important supply chain and infrastructure in nato countries, we must soberly assess these challenges, and not trade security interests for the sake of economic gain vasily borisovich how do you assess the prospects for this integration of the european and asian allies of the united states yes, the partnership of the four pacific countries with nato, respectively, and how everything it will be china's response. and this is an obvious priority of the american policy of transforming a system of such diverse alliances. e, in. asia into something more uniform like nato integration of this this new system. an alliance with, in fact, nato, er, china has already

shown how it reacts to this, first of all , it reacts to it with rather large-scale methods of economic warfare. these methods work to some extent. uh, with regard to some countries, an example of such a successful sanctions campaign can be considered a campaign against south korea in the sixteenth seventeenth year, when they forced south korea, precisely by the methods of severe economic coercion , to refuse to expand participation in american steam programs on the other sides. uh, in relation to australia, a similar company ended in complete failure. it was started in 2020, and in 21 australia entered a vacuum. that is, uh, it all depends on the internal political situation in a particular country. the chinese will be incredibly successful in slowing down, at least, the growth of cooperation with south korea there . of course, the issue is not south korea's concern, but the fact that it is being driven under quite

severe pressure. e in these formats, and in general, not with china, not with russia to quarrel. photo yes, and japan in general, not so much big in this enthusiast although they have a strong divergence from china e. that is, in each case, this chinese economic club will work differently, but there are also positive incentives, of course, which the chinese are also trying to create opportunities for them there and much more than the united states. and this is a big diplomatic struggle that will continue for the near future. i think that, as vyacheslav alekseevich correctly noted, the more intensively the united states will, e.g., consolidate its european and asian allies with each other, the great, and with great zeal, even i would say, china will move closer to russia, the stronger the russian chinese trend will become, of course, we see that this increase in tension is a huge factor

in activating china's relations, firstly with russia, and secondly strange central asia because he needs it just in case. and the military-political crisis guaranteed supply chains of strategically important products and backup supply chains. this will also disperse central asia the weak link is in europe, and this weak link in terms of precisely the policy of consolidating the european and asian allies of the united states with each other is france, which blocks, for example, nato's attempts to open its official office in tokyo here. listen to what the politician's publication writes about this. france delays deal to expand nato's presence in asia leading to a split in valencia on the eve of an important summit for several months, nato officials discussed plans to open a representative office in

japan, which would become the first outpost of the ally and in the region at a time of growing tensions between the west and china, this lithuania itself should have been the moment to move the plan forward, but french president emmanuel macron insist that such geographical dispersion will shift the alliance's attention from its original north atlantic focus . we basically do not support. this proposal told reporters. on friday, a french official from the elysee palace insisted that nato is geographically limited to the north atlantic. it was good that he treated the middle of the pin with immanuel macron during his recent state visit to beijing. but seriously, sergei sygraevich. why is france so afraid to anger? china well, you need to understand one simple thing. china is doing well. if the western world is a policy of threats, then the chinese world is a policy of supply. china is always traded traded very well. we now see what is happening in germany yes, not the best economic situation is the process of the day industrialization has been launched, and france has nuclear technology, france has fairly cheap energy and france

feels a certain freedom of its own, because in those conditions when the united states of america is fully investing in poland in order to create some kind of military fist that will be pulled other european countries, france stands apart. not italy, not spain , with all the pros and cons of france today. she can afford to occasionally speak in her own voice. so here's the bet she's made and she's me was supposed to play, because france will become the country that will participate in the process of global disintegration of europe , because china is now playing according to the same principles that when you played from the united states of america , there is no division to rule, the model that the united states of america can it’s profitable to offer for france, that is , by and large, it’s not the case, it’s not completely in the macron. the fact is that there are national interests and national interests that should have been forgotten about. the united states of america said no, you have no national interests. there are common interests in these common interests, and there are national national interests as well. and now france she is gradually trying to test the waters. and how are you there in the world majority?

how can i play with you? is it possible to integrate with you? what opportunities will we get? and, of course, france is now looking to the future, and the future is impossible without a world majority, because all the time they don’t want to be those who obey and be clients of france. and here is the problem, just the patron of clinical relations, and they develop, as once in ancient rome , when the patron once respected is too three years old and you have to look for a new one. it seems to me that this is a very true idea that it is impossible to be a leader and in general there is no future without close relations with the world majority and france indeed. she is trying to maintain some kind of, uh, preferential relations with china, let's remember france. she was going to go to the briks themselves in general, uh, to the republic of south africa and so on, and it seems to me that alexander mikhailovich is like that. eh, very i'll ask you briefly, france is fighting for its leadership. she understands that leadership in europe can be on the one hand on an anti-russian basis today. well , such realities have developed on the other hand only in

a dialogue with the world majority. no, i totally agree. the fact is that what is happening, uh, is a rebalancing of forces in europe itself in the european union before that, in fact, the germans themselves. their experts recognized that the european union is the fourth economic one in germany; now the greatest blow fell on germany in its de-industrialization, and it is becoming the source of the reindustrialization of america, therefore, a more balanced relationship will be built in the european union. naturally, this is in the interests of france, while china considers france as its dialogue in europe, and not the institutions of the european union , which will certainly weaken now we give the floor to the news and the big game will return at 23:00 don't miss.