why every generation has to break beat his mikhail pugovkin and many films are remembered only thanks to him on the set of one of his last paintings , philip yankovsky witnessed dozens of people gathered around pugovkin and everyone dreamed of telling their favorite artist. thank you. we were already late. here for the shooting, because we didn’t have much time, but he took a picture with every person with every child , wrote something from everyone, then people really loved him very much, incredibly, but thanks so much for that, that he made us happy and still make the main smile very nice thank you for your attention. alexey zolotov maria emelyanovo veronika or luchenkova anastasia bersenko. channel one to the artist's birthday on channel one premiere on sunday at 14:00 documentary mikhail pugovkin my life and immediately after the legendary comedy wedding in malinovka and that's all for now we are following

the development of events, and the information channel on channel one will continue the program time will tell . hello live on channel one program time will tell. i am artyom sheinin, of course, these two past days are july 11 and 12. yes, and today the morning of july 13, of course, well, i will not hide a lot of things that were discussed to show and watch. well, it would be nice fun and so on. and especially here, well, the result of the fact that they barely arranged and what vilnius himself arranged. and of course, all these memes or calicatures that are walking around are very revealing. well, my beloved, and according to the results, nato itself is everything. well, let's say that enough, but

the author of this uh briefly expressed it. don't know what is this a cartoon or a meme or what is it? and my favorite. this, although there is, there are still, uh, there are still good ones, which are the essence of what happened with the very potions from the ukrainian nato project on this very one. e summit. uh, hmm, there are not only caricatures, there are also photographs that really clearly reflect the essence, in many respects , of what seems to have happened there, for example, here is such a photograph, and i tell everyone right away, it's not photoshop yes, it 's frozen, it's frozen frame. but this is what really happened, that is, this is some kind of such a cast, the real reality, it was not invented by anyone in fact. yes, somewhere behind the scenes a stoltenberg is coming towards him, and he put it out in advance. i don't remember if it was already after some public flogging or even before it doesn't matter. well, let's say it all. so such is our inner creativity, it is clear that we, let's say, are not objective.

and here's what i objectively. here's to this reich, we are not objective and the ladies, of course, gave themselves a little freedom to mock. alone, because they deserve it with a margin lyceum of the lena yermak reznikovs and all of this gang of watering cans that puffed out their cheeks and , well, it’s always nice when they puff out their cheeks like this and then get it, which means, flicker, but very revealing. and now this is much more important than our some kind of temporary short. this is the times, this is the british times - this is the newspaper of that country and the newspaper that has always supported them and has been at the forefront of this support, and she takes the risk, uh, draws such a caricature and she publishes such a caricature from which it is quite obvious that, well, as if like this she evaluates the result for her recent still pet of what he was going to achieve in

this very vilnius well, looking at the very pet, of course, too. and it is clear how he is with the results. well, here is a very revealing piece. he is already on his way. record home, please. returning home with a good result for our state is very important for 2 days, we ourselves removed any doubts and ambiguities as to whether ukraine will be in nato? yes, well, about doubts of ambiguity, in my opinion, of course, he, uh, well an inclined hypocrite to play the part, and brothers to themselves and those around them, the question is not that ambiguous everything is really a lot, but ambiguities and misunderstandings are important for us, not even so much about ukraine . we have said to ourselves so many times that our enemy is on earth and even more so geopolitical, not ukraine, and in this sense it was a nato summit, and therefore

you could afford a couple of days, have fun about how they flog their serf, but who sold out in the stable, but still you need to to figure out, and what was the nato summit about, what are the results of nato itself as our real enemy, which is just waving these, so to speak, this hammer. this is much more important now, we will deal with this subject after advertising, do not switch. all amethyst you and i have just one mission and doing ours here. i help you. there from monday on the first pay cards. pam-pam-pam-pam-pam pay ozon with a cashback card up to 25% open for free in the ozon bank application. follow yourself

carefree callers don't notice how them minutes disappear such calls within the network do not consume a package of minutes within russia

help is needed chain is needed wind is needed, only wind is needed. kvass ochakovsky refreshes and inspires the right choice of millions of women. one tablet in the morning two components, three actions protects

blood vessels reduces capillary fragility increases tone venarus just like 1 2 3 alekseevna 100.000 rubles. gold. where is my son?

great look at her. frame one substitution we will be able to understand. only after the examination of the greenhouse at the stations and squares, mobile selection points for military service under the contract of 150 residents of this city of the amur region of agriculture operate. settlement we are fine. given not early,

you know how it will grow. well, come and see. the program time will tell, we continue to work

live and now we will discuss it live on the air in a little more detail, let's say so calmer. but what do we have at the end after the nato summit, and on the basis of what we can draw a conclusion. what are the plans? ah, our adversary has exactly nato, since we understand that well, ukraine has only conditionally speaking for them, a hammer with which they are trying to break our head, and in this sense, of course, it is important to understand, and in fact , saying whether he is now a hammer and whether he is now a hammer or some other next hammer, that is, but, leaving aside the expectations themselves are inflated and disappointment disorders. uh, ukrykhovskaya really needs to be analyzed now calmly, has something changed on this. in fact after that themselves something in terms of the tool they are going to use after us against us or in general.

well, let's hear from biden a, who has been dating for an hour. there he spoke with the ukrover. well, here is a very interesting phrase performed by aides, please. zelensky seemed very pleased with everything we were doing, when we left we spent about an hour together. i i think we are on the right track the trip went very well. we have achieved every goal we have set for ourselves. now zelensky understands one thing, it doesn’t matter whether he is in nato now or not, as long as he has the obligations of the alliance agreed with the allies. and here's the question for me, when i heard it. uh, it’s interesting when biden says, that’s all. about uh, granddaughter of the earth is it still the same project as it has been all this time or is he already talking about something else, which in his perception is in his plans as - and not only his, uh, has changed or is beginning to change, because uh, he is a potion and

it's not a question of his spiritual world, which is rich in quotation marks. and this is a question of, and what did he really take away from this conversation? who is he now bidden and who is now bidden to him, and such an interesting moment is that in the same. eh, like the videos from which i started the program, there is such an interesting moment where a the potion thanks. and where the potion thanks an odd number of times, you now yes 47 times, as everyone counted, let's see for those who can't see. this is very significant in my opinion. i’ll tell you now why, please, for emotions, i’m uncle ukraine, the leader of the netherlands, uncle received

the kingdom, rice, thorns, for example, ministers, i ’m like france ivan macron , i’m like you and ukraine is small. that's it, yes. but look, here is your reaction, by the way, it is very revealing, you laugh. so, uh, he dyakoval uh, dyakoval. uh, 8 minutes. he yelled. if that's without uh winding, doing emphasis on this word. and here is a very interesting question, judging by your reaction, what does someone think, looking at this, what is it? so he got that same spanking that i showed at the beginning and it seems like he is here, well, what is called now? here it is bowing, someone thinks it is exactly the opposite. what a potion, whether he felt something like that, or something like that, understood, or maybe found out that he could not resist. in my opinion,

he cannot resist repeated sarcasm that these are all 47 dyakuyu, and there, so as not to frighten people, yakui 47, that's what it is. here's an ongoing, coming from somewhere inside something that is more than sarcasm. which began to break through. we are all with you. uh, remember, uh, in such an absentee dialogue with attention. i started with a cartoon in the times , a very indicator, what exactly is taken from it appeared even more revealing that it was the british secretary of defense wallace a, who was and i don’t know, perhaps remains one of the most active, uh, supporters of ukrainians, i suddenly remembered attention. since may 22, a story about which neither never told about how he went to kiev and said, we are not an amazon for you, and so on , the underlining in this story is most important of all, that volya has never told this story

since may, 22 years old, and only now and exactly now on against the backdrop of what happened, he decided to tell it, well, adding, roughly speaking, to this rather spicy dish. so this is your story. what does he do in response to this? a potion, and in response to this potion, the potion breaks again . e, too, to such stage sarcas reminded. we have always been grateful and always are grateful. i just don't know how else we should be thankful. let him write. i need to give thanks, and i will give thanks in such a way that we are already completely grateful. we can wake up in the morning and immediately begin to thank the minister. personally , i really don't understand what the question is. we are grateful to britain and not our partners. we have a very close relationship, our intelligence is on excellent terms. and our ministry, here is our minister of defense, alexei, you have a bad relationship with the minister of defense, wonderful.

well, thank him. mr. secretary of defense of great britain, i am very grateful to you for the storm, including call him, please, today. yes, i'll do it, geek. this, in my opinion, is called by the actors such a mini official for a second. well, humiliation and mr. and anything, but here is an important question. we agreed that we are now discussing. these are not artistic bows, but we are discussing the essence behind this perhaps. and what is it? e, he arranges it, as well as these 47 e dyakuyu. he arranges something. this is possible, understanding or feeling what has happened or is happening or will happen, i don’t know, but okay, he is in the end. he is an artist there, somewhere there, well, all he knows how to do is to act beautifully. maybe the tower was torn down a little bit, but a very revealing

moment for me is the words of the ambassador. echoes in that same london where the times and where the bance, which has been rubbing there for a long time and who, in general , is an adult and not stupid, too, apparently, has heard enough of something there. and like something this, perhaps, he began to understand, and this very ambassador, as it were, of a country , as if the president, who is this actor, they ask on british television what he is talking about all this, as it were, a rampage of sarcasm thinks the answer is very interesting to me and amazing, please. presen zelensky i think president zelensky responded with a bit of sarcasm when he announced yesterday that every morning he would wake up and call ben wales to thank him. i don't think this is healthy sarcasm. we we must not show the russians that there are disagreements between us. i don't think this is healthy sarcasm.

he says, as if the country's ambassador, as if the president, who is on british television, well, it is clear that the country is, as it were, the ambassador, but nevertheless, when the ambassadors begin to discuss this. uh, more or less, it doesn't matter where and what to discuss, to discuss with the authorities, with an approximate understanding that the whole world will hear it later, because it's on television. this is also an indicator. what is it when a flock knows or understands and knows that brite shaita also already know and understand, respectively, from all this follows the question is for the west, whether for the americans and separately. the british separately or for them all together does not matter. cro reich as a project or their kings as a project, at the head of which zelensky is still standing, begins to somehow change or just evicted him and roughly speaking, he still continues to perform the same function, or it’s not without it not without it, but to me here such

a multi-layered meaning is seen, the first, most likely, zelensky knows something about benny wallace that, perhaps, yes, not dismissed does not know about himself. it was not for nothing that he mentioned that they have an excellent relationship with british intelligence, and british intelligence and the british military are two competing organizations for a second. so maybe zelensky didn’t risk anything when he publicly humiliated the british defense minister for a second. and he did it repeatedly deliciously. and it seems to me that he even experienced some pleasure, because before that he was flogged. and then he got the opportunity invest britain yes there was a feeling that he psychologically compensated for the humiliation that caused. there are for sure. so what about biden zelensky's statement. he praised him so much that i joked on social networks that he praised him so much that he showed zelensky that he was dead, because, well, you can’t just praise like that. eh, really it’s either very good or not at all, but very good, with the corresponding conclusions now the dry

residue that you spoke about after yourself was generally very good, but not in sense of the ukrainian issue, a good demonstrative characteristic, but he was supposed to demonstrate the unity of the nato member countries , he did not demonstrate in this sense a very good one for us. for us, of course, we understood the latter, and it was unambiguously stated. samite that nato member countries are transferring their economies to war footing. they set their tasks and counter russia and attention. china's military opposition. for this they made all the fundamental and tactical decisions and practical decisions. by increasing the contingent of troops and so on all these proposals for uset and others that were made that let's now weiss, bass nato in front of the borders of russia, all this is really. these are things that are necessarily realized later, but then now further. eh, it is very important that he

slipped a moment regarding ukraine. uh, it's not being discussed right now. and it seems to me that it is very fundamental that the admission of ukraine to nato has become possible, however, in two steps, and in one this is an extreme moment, an extremely important moment, and one more moment that has not been officially fixed, but he said that ukraine can be taken in parts. this seems to me to be a very pragmatic approach. i would even say i wasn’t, but i began to blurt out more and more actively to take to nato, i mean in parts. yes, this is very important, but also regarding zelensky e. he's the one who started it all. here is the performance. these speeches, these sarcasms. further, then , in order for a person to return to ukraine , where they are waiting for him, as if with a result, and he needs at least a pr result. see how i drove their face on the table, that is, we are krivoy rog lads. yes, you can’t take it, we answered them there, based on what ukrainian admirers will now say, well, ours is good , ours, here he is, what a handsome man he

put on the british minister and hugged biden. there, he didn’t say anything for an hour, he went to bow. yes, he is not such a result for ukraine but here is pr the result is now he understood? well, that is, i absolutely agree with you that, perhaps, it was some kind of work for an internal audience, which does not change the fact that, well, the framework with which you can work for an internal audience, it still somehow correlated with the reality, nevertheless, that he does it from the barsky court and find out what they can right here, but here is this version about mi6. it is really very interesting. and moving on to the discussion of this, once again i say for us, of course, it is important that we understand that there is no independent ukraine there. that this is some kind of i don’t know, a club. eh, hammer. uh, anything nato, but nonetheless. uh, it’s interesting by what happened there, what it said, what it sounded like to understand some nuances, but nato

the approach has changed, including to this instrument against us, or these are some kind of ripples on the water. now everything will settle down and will be very interesting as before. well, it's not even a phrase. this is such a kind of joke, but such a meaningful one for biden, by the way, surprisingly. what about a person who usually greets the air and does not understand where he is. and here now. pay attention, he showed an incredible reaction, combined with a sense of humor. this usually indicates a fairly high. e concentration. a. well, listen. the bad news for you is that we're going nowhere. let's not get away, you're stuck with us. yes, you know, that is, he is focused after the joke. she is multifaceted. joke. that's why i 'm talking to you, as a person who professionally interprets a lot of meanings, please contact me. and yes, what do you think he means, because there are a lot of jokes in this joke, someone

translates it like that, and perceives it like that when he says it, like, boy, be blown away. here we are the owners and we are still for a long time, or there is something else. eh, it's even something. maybe it's homemade. or is he really in really good shape, about that this? how to understand this in a relationship? e hmm well , grandfather's grandchildren, yes, in relation to grandfather and grandchildren. it must first of all be understood that the american policy towards ukraine and support for the war in ukraine against russia, and it is in a state of transition in a transitional state, and therefore, therefore, you see, he said the same bad news, that means because there is still bad news . we 'll talk about them, but we're not going anywhere, you know, that is, it's really that the jester does not believe that he himself wrote, some believe that the bad news is we're not going anywhere. it was not a joke that, roughly speaking, he meant that you might not like the boy, that you have such masters. well, as if there are no others and never will be. but yes, it's important about the transition. yes

, that's just the point and on the one hand. you see, the united states cannot take it now and just like that. well, we're leaving, this will never happen by definition. yes, it's obvious. you can also discuss it there, but the problem is that everything is more and more complicated inside the united states. uh, begins to push through the very idea of ​​uh, support for ukraine uh, as an example. yes, this is a very important point. yes , tomorrow congress is to vote on a new $886 billion defense budget. so tomorrow he definitely won't pass the votes, no uh-huh why are there no votes? because on the one hand, the extreme left, that is, the left wing of the democratic party, but in the euro, even more so, the extreme right, the so-called freedom faction cocos, these right-wing ultra-conservative republicans. they categorically refuse to support this the project for two reasons, one reason is purely internal, they just want to remove

these policies, which means you know all sorts of gender equality, gender and so on in the army. they want to remove it now, we are talking about this, but the second point. they want to severely cut military aid to ukraine, uh, to make it accountable for control, and not just want to completely nullify a separate program. here there somewhere 300 million dollars. this is a program that has already existed for almost 10 years, by the way, the fourteenth year, in my opinion, you can at 13:00. it seems to me that after all, this is a program according to which ukrainian servicemen came to the united states and were trained, and many months at a time, for six months. there were even nine by 12 at us military bases and some of them waiting. that is, all these things they want to remove. uh-huh and uh, sooner or later, of course, they want to remove uh, uh, well, while relying on what arguments she has very simple arguments. you understand that in america, this is just the americans pick up the phone and call the amount of the congressman. yeah u them so such a political culture. it's

very like that. you know, people are oriented to local problems. yeah, but when they have problems, and when they think that they are calling congressmen, they say, they already called us, stop supporting ukraine, because the problem is that the united states of their one and a half trillion a year deficit budget. so we are still sending money to ukraine, i understand that the infrastructure is dilapidated. i'm talking about outgoing trains . this is all the next time the borders of the south are practically open. this just from their problems, the roof of the problem of poverty is enough. problems will not pass without. yes, and people say, but we are money somewhere incomprehensibly. where we give, after all, the most important thing, well, okay, they would give money the result where that the front has moved hasn’t moved anywhere, nothing is happening and plus, respectively, again, we have been talking about this many times , including, i said that after about 6 months, if nothing changes, it will even be like now, nothing will change, let's say yes, no positive changes. not even for russia. that's how it will be democrats are desperate, it will be necessary to remove ukraine from the agenda, because then it

will be such a trump card in the hands of the republicans. why are you throwing so much money, there are no results, everything is for the democrats. this, of course, did not defend democracy very much. yes , at the same time, in fact, a republican, you know, the republic ends are hawks. yes. they are very supportive of nato today, by the way, they once again introduced a draft law that prohibits the us president from leaving nato without getting approval congress. well, it hints at trump. there is, of course, suddenly yes, yes, that is, and of course, the republicans. they even more actively support it than democracy, that is, they are tough, but at the same time you understand nato, of course, nato is fighting russia, yes, russia is the enemy russia has no friends in america do you bet something american should understand this? but still, it means ukraine , of course, it would be necessary to support, but guys, i'm the limit to everything. and now this limit begins to emerge on the horizon, understood from ukraine no, sooner or later they will leave, there is definitely no talk about the fact that they left vietnam left.

that's all, of course. now you can't just turn around and leave. and let's denote that the candy-bouquet period has ended. in general. yes, because, roughly speaking, roughly speaking, allow yourself for the period of the grandfather of grandchildren in the american. i'll finish here. yes, i allow myself a metaphor, you understand what zelensky was counting on. yes, well, rudely. here is such a metaphor, to watch lamb shurpa, you need a ram, zelensky arrived, and we dumped into a vegan shurpa. yeah, you know, the shamelessness without what you wanted to understand, and the americans said, but this is how we have it, yes. here is such it is clear in this regard, an extreme question about these discussions here. well, as if in the nuances that they are leaving, or they are preparing to leave, and this is the question. in what form will they remain? yes, we agree that they cannot leave there and give it all up, because it is theirs to continue; the question is to what extent they will be present and again, returning to this phrase. uh, grandfather, which he said, it means, uh, her granddaughter can also be understood that way, but he, after all, as

he said. and what about what i showed at the beginning, uh, this, uh, biden’s phrase, what doesn’t matter in nato or without nato, but you, like, don’t worry. you have, uh, allied obligations. here, uh, we're on the right track. and you have the obligations of allies who are not going anywhere. so he says, now zelensky understands one thing. and how would you screw it all up so quickly. well, yes, now he is a member of nato or not, while he has the obligations of the alliance agreed upon by the allies. after all, this can be understood, and so this is not a conversation about how he should go somewhere forward, no one will touch you. you’re like, like, our boy, this is it, we discussed here many times that the americans have an idea, perhaps frosts, because now it’s more interesting for them in the light of what you said to go, because we won’t take you to nato because she will need to protect you. well, don't worry, as

if everything is here, uh, so to speak, is, as it is. by the way, in this sense, they said the same thing to an afghan. they are the same, said south vietnamese. well, further results from but in fairness with uh, well, we leave the vietnamese aside, because after all, there was the soviet union and china, this is generally a separate conversation, when they said, it’s about the afghans, no one stood behind the afghans in afghanistan, they played their own game on their own image. but still, here they have an obvious e, conflict with e, and they won with russia, china for hegemony, and so on, of course, that is the loss here. for their image is on the order, so it's a completely different story. just an extra clarification. i'm wondering what you mean about this, but about this possible future fate of the ukrainian project for the americans and their establishment. not the case. i don't believe that people like that say things like that by accident. here, as if not in connection with something that, literally at the time, it was the director of the

russian foreign intelligence service, sergei naryshkin, who spoke about his conversation with burns, which took place already on 29 june. yes, sergey naryshkin told about him now, and it is important that this phrase sounds here. what did we talk about, mostly around ukraine , we thought about what to do with ukraine yes burns well, first of all, we understand that people are of such a level. they just don’t say something that wasn’t there, because they have one time. well, this sounds exactly against the background of the same thing. about as if they themselves, and against the background of all these conversations, are leaving him, so that it means, if it, firstly, went into denial, by the way, he said no. we are not so. we basically, mostly talked about two june 4ths, so he interpreted it this way. okay, we're not talking about that now. so, in fact, in the west, in general, in the usa, in particular , it has taken root in their heads, and you are analysts , politicians, ordinary citizens, and they

inspired each other with such a thing that russia’s goal is to occupy everything, ukraine uh-huh naturally though. if we look at the goals that president putin formulated at the beginning of the war, the goal of the abolition of ukrainian statehood is not there. tam tam there are other goals. they believe that this is precisely the goal, so no. let's be fair, and the abolition of the current ukrainian statehood, which we now have. that is, to demilitarize, but without the abolition of the bandera state. can you imagine, they think that's what they're going to do, that is, just pick up and dissolve. yes, you understand, dissolve , then, but no one is convinced, therefore, that is, what follows from this point of view with an american. so this is what victory is even so to speak, victory is success can be considered an exception. this is about ukraine disappearing with maps of the world, that is , it was in some form, so here is this context. what do you have to discuss? what to do that is, i'm sure naryshkin.

naturally, he somehow revealed the russian position, it is clear that far from all of us know that we are not going to include it entirely in the russian federation, yes. the main thing is that there are not clowns and drug addicts sitting there in kiev. and banderov has a neutral status there. well, well, americans, they are they don't hear. in the sense that they think not. no. they want to express the soviet union , they want to take it all back completely and include it in russia. this is what they want from them with this. so remember. here, in fact. let's help with russian. to restore the soviet union is called a , respectively, moving on. in the course of these discussions, what is now with the project. uh, zelensky is not from the point of view of zelensky himself, will it be green or not, what now with the project? ukraine yes, what is it for them? is this part of the start let's say some reduction in the form and purpose of their presence, it’s not like moving somewhere and destroying us, and not giving us ukraine, and that’s all, but this summit is

very interesting. eh, i think it's a very interesting indicator. this is a declaration of the g7, we started discussing it yesterday. and about, well, what, they now, as if they see this future ukraine, there are very interesting moments there. let's listen. we leaders of the g7 reaffirm our unwavering commitment to the strategic goal of a free independent democratic and sovereign ukraine, within its internationally recognized borders, is capable of defending itself and deterring future aggression. we will support ukraine for now. it will defend itself against russian aggression. as long as it takes each of us will work with ukraine on specific bilateral long-term security commitments and agreements aimed at providing a sustainable force capable of defending ukraine now and deterring russian aggression. in the future, in the event of future armed attacks by russia, we intend to immediately consult with ukraine to determine the appropriate

next steps. and here is an interesting story with this declaration. this is what i highlighted in red - this, well, the guys and i highlighted it ourselves, because these are some moments that help to understand, this is what i started with. yes, this is their vision of a certain development. word future. yes, the word is the future, you understand some? future aggression in order for there to be future aggression, it means that there must be some interval when they do not see aggression, be careful, now on thin ice. you find artyom, i see. i 'm constantly here on the current. there 's really no one here. usually no one strengthens, so that he never, well, relaxes. you see something on the pedestals, standing. and we are walking right here. if anything, there , such a hatch went there, and fell out somewhere, that there is somewhere in australia to grow, and there the kangaroo says, hello, hanging out. so i remember everything here, you understand, that is , in order to talk about some of this, that is, in short, from this declaration. i see that they have, they are already starting to talk about some future situation between which and

the current situation there is some kind of gap that i personally don’t really understand how they imagine it, yes, moreover, but from zelensky to whom this is all addressed and in general, what it is, too, does not really understand. listen to the question he was asked. vladimir alexandrovich today the leaders of the g7 agreed on a declaration, but there was no signing. can you explain why you didn’t sign and, most importantly, why this declaration is important it's like what they signed. just like that this procedure was chosen. that is, it's the same as what these leaders signed, or whether it's another fit of sarcasm in him again. that's whether he really surrenders to me that he really does not understand. and i'm not even sure that those who told him this, probably, had to somehow. well, they didn't tell him either. if he doesn't understand, that's why they, uh, uh, ukraine, they don't understand what to do? and klitschko is busy. eh, how would he have some kind of

business there, apparently, so, in principle, this should be given to klyuchko and then klitschko would immediately explain everything, but klitschko is busy. they connected to this danilov danilov did everything that the ball could. but well, in general, listen to the analysis, uh, few people have been analyzed, few others have done regarding the seven specifically. and this was the key thing, when we will have separate agreements for our security with each member of the seven. it is very important that the countries that own nuclear weapons provide us with such assistance. i think that this thing is absolutely useful for us, moreover, it is also absolutely now nuclear weapons are something that, unfortunately, is feared in the west. well, it is quite clear that yes. so i see that all of you people are not stupid, but you are so, although, of course, interpreting danilov is so-so for intelligent people. the task is here. well, that is, it is quite clear that they are raving about a freely occupied topic on a freely given topic. and now you, mr. professor , will have to perform a thankless task and, in

a sense, cast pearls in front of pigs. a. e, if you, of course, understand about what the beads explain to me explainable, but explain? well, that is, here before here before the days. try to explain this is the declaration that will now be posted. here's something else that, uh, yes, because uh, within the framework of what this is, within the framework of the formation of a book on history, psychology, one also had to read a comrade, freud and a number of other comrades, here, uh, some elements. eh, appear in particular arises. ah, a closed circle. where did it all start? yes, on january 20, in my opinion , 22, zelensky speaking in munich yes, she munch. the conference says, give us nuclear weapons, and then everything will be fine. yes, now it's been a year and a half already, and they are back to it again. what about guarantees? zelensky also spoke about them here. basically, right from the start. yes, what

else can we say in the pre-istanbul period. yes , when there were negotiations, uh, in belarus, but, what, but ukraine needs guarantees so that there won’t be. e, too, here is what you have highlighted in orange so that there is no future aggression, so to speak, but, but you understand still, in order to have a future, you need to somehow answer the question. a? what is it? well , here what now here and here there are two logics. yes, one logic, but we continue the war ukraine must win on the battlefield, and the counteroffensive. these are long people who do not have such a logic, such declarations, but at the same time because they are people. stupid and need something to support. er, well, having a nervous breakdown. let's say it directly from psychology textbooks. yes, but comrade zelensky is like that, but citizen zelensky, uh, he needs something support, therefore a declaration is adopted that develops. uh, the second track is the second direction, that on the one hand you defeat

the guys on the battlefield, and we will give everything, we will give you all the harness. well, besides the nuclear one, probably, eh , eh, the second track is to freeze the line to freeze, what stop that there are elections in america, what money is being pumped up? yes? so, a and in general everyone is tired and here it is just indicative for me. that is, i follow the statements. as times pristayka, because. in general, this is a ukrainian choir, uh, which sings in general with one voice. yes a at flock stands out quite clearly it is several times. uh, he has already publicly spoken about the huge losses of ukraine in the first place, he is not from this clo. he is not from this he works. it is clear that this is the same enemy of russia, it may be even worse because it is smarter. yes , of course, but nevertheless, and he, and he focuses on losses. yes, he actually says openly that there is a massacre, it is not clear

why aha, which ukrainians are dying. and accordingly, well, while he still does not dare. eh, say it right away. let's stop this carnage, ah, but gradually towards this comes up and this one, well, while being, while being in britain, who does more than others, so that this does not happen, so that this does not happen and this one of his, uh, the current attack on zelensky cannot be said differently, yes, the ambassador has no right this is how any diplomat behaves. eh, fortunately. unfortunately, he does not have the right to express his point of view. there is no sheining diplomacy, there is no drum diplomacy. no , it is very subtle, therefore public diplomacy. yes, but there is. if we go into the doors of the embassy and speak in the embassy dressed we have no right to our own point of view. and we get instructions. what and how do we develop this or that aspect of state policy and do it if we go beyond this framework, that is, from this point of view. this is a thankless job. sometimes a diplomat has to say what he doesn't

like, everything is clear. what is that when the flock says it. eh, this is no accident. does he know something from his british colleagues or does he know about some processes going on inside the ukrainian society or or and here is how as we approach, e to the second line to the reserve line. even so the plan. b freeze freeze, which, frankly, is from this document, which, er, here, well, where it was wiped from it. i why all the seven is visible frost? here is the document. here frost comes through, of course, that is, it comes through. i carefully use your advice, however, they say, klitschko comes through from him, that the people who wrote this and they proceed from the fact that some kind of freeze has already happened and something like that has happened, and they say this, as if about that situation is absolutely correct. and here, just here, uh, why is it important for ukraine to freeze the conflict after freezing? yes? naturally. e no peace

treaty e are not born quickly. and we are now putting aside that in all these constructions there is no, as if we we are not there yet. how would us from this point of view. yes , we are talking about them, for example, between russia and japan , hostilities ceased in the forty-fifth year, and the peace treaty. no, well, again , the loin and, accordingly, here, uh, here's a freeze. yes, an incomprehensible situation. and here it is everything is related to that situation. yes, and zelensky says. well, and in the west, many write about this, which is impossible for the hawks of war. yes, it’s impossible to freeze the conflict, that putin and mordor will accumulate strength in a month or two to shake themselves up, many say that zamora is impossible because they will give them everything a person lacks here and then they won’t climb. that's why it has its own dialectic, frosts, i don't argue. but for them , they don’t take rotation for this point of view, it’s understandable, that is, well, they apparently proceed from the fact that they have some kind of tools or can

tools will appear. uh, how to implement this point of view if the conflict freezes ukraine can join nato, listen to daltenberg. the date may send troops to ukraine, too. listen here here. not a fact, this is not a fact, you don’t understand it, there they say after a time , either you will join, after the victory, yes, or you will join, after they will end the armed conflict from here, look , just now finland is this time covering something grandfather, just got excited. he's right today, in general, just a frog. ukraine will join nato but not at the time of the conflict. otherwise it would have led to a third world war. he says, biden, by the way, do not mention the word victory yes, the ukrainian conflict, he says, he remembers the declaration and the people, what they had in mind the ukrainian conflict, he says, the biden will not drag on for years. will not drag on for years says, because they

do not need it to some extent. yes, on the one hand. yes, there is logic. here is an endless slaughter, yes, uh , for which america does not bear any direct responsibility. yes, they pay money. well, yes, and so it would be before that someone on a visit earns someone earns yes, and a wonderful situation has been said many times that it happens once every 100 years. yes, but try to strangle russia with the wrong hands, yes, not being directly involved, but on the other hand. here 's what he was talking about. eh, michael is also right. yes , in a year, to be elected, and there it is not out of love for russia, but solely out of struggle, of course. that what the reasons for which they may need to freeze may be different. yes, but the designs that we are discussing now, and this biden phrase has just been in another different finland that, like , you understand, it will not last there for years. and that's all they tell them. here we are during the conflict. we can't take it, but after the conflict, what is after the conflict, that is the question. here i wrote about it yesterday. i

prescribed it yesterday, you know, as if they all have such a thing in their heads, just like you told me then, we discussed it with you. yes, this is such thinking with prices from films. that is , as if war is war, everyone is running and shooting, then once the gluing begins to play music, the whole conflict is over, everything is already over, which means that they are sitting and discussing the admission of ukraine to nato, but this does not happen in life, and what is typical, by the way? that's really. here is the rhetoric about what is on the battlefield. now we will win, she suddenly left somewhere. look here. in this sense, it is very important that we all noted that fair. here is the rhetoric of a year ago that only victory is only the crushing of russia and then then then now we are talking about guarantees, and the security of ukraine and its guarantee against some alleged future future, despite the fact that it is still not clear what the matter is now, and even look here. let 's take a specific example here. the most attackams has been going on for 2 weeks for two weeks. this is a fuss.

some kind of publication and an american one throws in that it seems that a decision has already been made to give atakams, and then the pentagon denies, then it means again someone writes, in my opinion, the wall street journal it was that, sort of, like everything has already been decided, but word after biden and then, like, again silence. and here they go again. as i understand it, yes, the missiles will go , listen to biden. they will give them. i'm sure ukraine already has an equivalent to missiles. so what do they need now? so this is artillery ammunition. we are currently working on their deliveries. and here, by the way, a very interesting zelensky who says that the timing of the attacks with an incomprehensible and very important phrase. while it is better not to raise this technical question, he is not quite right, because they also start from the installation highmax, then what he was talking about is what ukraine has, this is this side now that such a plan weighs there. other platforms yes , you understand the experience of completely different platforms, so here it is technically. even he is not quite right,

that is, this is complete rhetoric, in fact. well, if the ukrainians run out, they will run out of these missiles, they will be given an atakus, no, leonid will give them to them sooner or later. this is exactly what they will be given sooner or later, but here the question is sooner or later than described. this is described by that there will be some idea that they can win or there will be some feeling that they can be completely crushed. that's the point, going back to talking all the time. the only thing that is holding back the western partners of ukraine from transferring all types of weapons first to the six-stone, then scalps, then to attacks, and so on, there is only one thing, but how the scattering will behave in this situation with leopards is already clear. i hope, as with gems, as with other things with f-16, it also more or less becomes. i understand now, but i think extremely important statement by sergei viktorovich lavrov regarding. i just wanted, of course, the f-16, somehow everything is somehow, regardless of hmm will there be some kind of body kit and so on

there will not be it, we consider the supply of f-16 as an existential threat to russia with all the ensuing consequences doctrinal for a second. here is the question here. oh come on, you won't russians use nuclear tactical nuclear. it 's just not worth it anymore, because we have we have doctrinal, yes obligations, like in front of their people, which will be fulfilled, in principle, that's why such such a shadow on weaving. here is one, he says one thing, and then a leak, then again, then zelensky says. let's not talk about it at all. uh, as i said, the missiles are already on their way, most likely, it's like with cluster people today, there is one brigadier general all in one. i suggested that he be given the title of mr. evidence said. what do you know. and, in fact, they already gave us. we just haven’t used it yet, so it was with french old ladies, as they are called, who are already there a everything, it seems to be quite obvious, but the question is not what is there. what is not there? the question of conditions is the question of the place

of application of pronouns. yes, that's it , and that's it. and that's all that follows, including these important technical details , they stem from the point at which decision-making is made. and what's next for nato , including for america and in particular they are now and we will now continue this conversation, because that's how we understand. where are they, including from the point of view of the strategic planning horizon is, then the most important answer to so many. well, such questions are not theoretical for us, do not switch short advertisements, as always, very interesting. this is also irina vereshchuk, and whom and where she was going to reintegrate, no referendums will be recognized, these statements of hers say that if you have a russian passport, then the least that you can face is the prison organizes the actual purges of torture with the help of former presidents.

they brought her just to zelensky and said, take a closer look at this woman, such ones will come in handy, how she used to follow the commands sit stand. and i'm sorry to lie, i understand how to organize the work, because she herself was once a local authority, as a mayor. she didn't . no favor to people terrible man. you sold all the land to steal, as it is . others would be simply afraid of five areas leaving more to eat such a polish american freedom fund and sent to study. warsaw university from there. she returned not just savvy, but supported by a western russophobe. she entered, as she thinks, into the elite of the world. irina vereshchuk servant of the wrong people doll heir, tutti today on the first and always on one tv point ru kino 1 tv presents what kind of building we don't go there here the war was a military

base, i don't know. why are we in the restricted area? i just arrived yesterday about the restricted zones, i don't know anything. and you should know to prepare from the mountains of stalin with a completely eastern bloc and a new one we will move into the world. she must stop. i will order this. this was our best agent, his call sign. the nemesis valkyrie holds many secrets. it doesn't matter, only one up to 80% big premiere on kinopoisk can beat the food department already in the bank's number one online cinema subscription. everything you need for your bedroom is in

ormatek just now a double soft bed with a mattress for only 24.990 rubles. armatek. sleep expert help needed. wind, all you need is wind. kvass ochakovsky refreshes inspires every day vtb's solution is to please loved ones with convenient and fast transfers in russia and more than 10 countries around the world. get a free debit card for life for 159 rubles. application. 124-99

nothing sacred is left in you. yes i do did not see myself. god see everything. he will punish you do not get upset. listen to me. right now , our kidneys are not working very carefully. and we have three months with you, i suppose. but the premiere of the serial film one tv presents the film found me.

it's you 1tv movie represents, well, how was your benefit performance, the sea of ​​flowers was wonderful, they were also stolen. i gave them to a friend and what was the name of this friend alexander will show

, we continue to try to analyze live after the end of the nato summit, vilnius actually about what it was not in form, but in content, i want to remind everyone and yesterday i already started discussing this studio, that this is a declaration about some not very understandable future, the future from which and about which they promise this to ukraine it is very interesting there that it is, as it were, ukrainian, nato themes. but in general, this declaration was adopted by japan, japan, which is not a nato member country, but, as it were, on formal grounds. she is now involved in this, as if the context is involved. she is not only in this context, and not only she, because it is not the first time in memory, of course, but there are countries that are not members of nato, but, nevertheless, which form very

important blocs or potential blocs for nato , namely japan south korea australia and new zealand are countries that there, uh, there is also here a a very important question for me, how much, in fact, here we are all discussing the ukrainian agenda, there the agenda of the conflict with russia, how much we can actually underestimate that she was not her, maybe she was the noisiest most noticeable brightest, which means, as if with a lot of gags. and what was actually the main one, perhaps it was completely different, but the agenda. in any case , they heard very well in china. what was the main agenda, and by now you have probably also listened. yes, and they will deliberately instruct china to distort politics arbitrary and they appeal to the communiqué of the vilnius summit, which is filled with this rhetoric, the mentality of cold water,

the chinese comrades are well aware that well , so to speak, nato has long been not only about e northern a about the north atlantic. moreover, and this, of course, was heard from us and today's words spoken on this occasion. lavrov sergey lavrov, and in indonesia they are also very indicative in this sense, please. as for stoltenberg, i have known him for a long time, the nordic character speaks, not directly in verse. uh, and this is not the first time such statements have been made. well , firstly, i already mentioned a little earlier today that the doctrinal documents of both the united states and nato state that russia and china are threats and challenges. but now he e declared confidence literally this morning.

i read that it’s not just russia’s plans for china, but relations between russia and china that are a threat to the entire atlantic alliance, that is, we are generally not supposed to have relations even if they want to, and this is a hopeless path , this is a path that once again confirms the relevance , and the urgent task of countering modern forms of colonialism, which we and our partners are now posing with many tasks. opposition to attempts at hegemony in world affairs and opposition direct violation of the already mentioned principles of the charter on the need to respect in practice in practice the sovereign equality of all states , nato members are clearly not ready for this megalomania. it manifests itself in all the actions and leadership of the nato secretariat and the member countries , by and large, it can be seen by everyone. this is visible to everyone, and this is a way to nowhere, and so on

, the question is still for me, and we have come to this point many times on various occasions. as far as we believe, this is the path and this agenda. and this rhetoric becomes for them actually, perhaps, the main one. and everything that happens. here in this theater it is roughly speaking, well, just one of the fronts. and maybe now it’s not the main thing for the question to go there, to crawl out, to change forms, to shorten these there, as far as you feel. this agenda is coming out, it is still the main one, but it certainly will not be the main one. judging even by the doctors of the united states and nato, and, of course, everything will move, including to the pacific site. it is very important to mention here. i think that the information which is now little massed in the press, but it is very, very relevant, and they say that biden hinted to zelensky that it would be good to die appetites, because otherwise, or this is already a fait accompli, ukraine will be smaller. there will be less funding to feed. and this is already obvious. you

probably noticed that before there were two and a half, three and four billion. now it is already 700-600 million. and so on. that is, in principle, this process has already begun. this suggests that this part will really try to freeze attention now. why japan is present and why south korea is invisibly present and some sources are now in a somewhat disturbing state. although we in our broadcasts i have in all cases talked about this and japan and to a lesser extent, south korea wants to have nuclear weapons, they want japan open south korea is hidden. and they, er, in principle, politicians are hinting on the sidelines of conversations that we are ready to consider the possibility of placing us nuclear weapons on our territory, or allowing the us to create them ourselves. and we will do it technologically technologically. everything is there for this. i mean, it's even a question. maybe not years, but months, so china, uh, very uh,

perked up and drew this red line very clearly. he said guys, cold war. and that's all that follows, we went through all this with the soviet union. we are looking at an example. we study it in institutes and so on. it won't work. that's why china began to inflate the american economy. especially from a point of view. there are rare earth metals, and microcircuits and so on. he he began to hint unambiguously that trump’s trade war is, of course, children ’s toys, compared to what actually can be produced here, by the way, it is very important that, returning a little to that the thesis that i mentioned in the decision themselves is vilnius, but hmm, about transferring the economies of western countries to a military footing. this is a fact, but attention is a question. how can you declare? but how do you do it without raw materials and software in conditions of limited funding, that is, in principle, everything adds up and leads to the fact that that ukraine now it will be put on

a starvation ration, because money and raw materials are needed for another fundamental force , there can be serious problems. in any case, in the usa, that is, they must have known that someone else was working. in these factories. you see, we noticed that the usa is now calling the old people, uh, snowmen, the ones who used to make weapons, because there is no one to work, but, by the way, about uh, hiring labor in the usa, which can be a problem. i used to be like he was in 2006, when vladimir vladimirovich and i were a disgrace they shot a movie about america there in san francisco in chinatown interviewed people. well, the chinese live there, not in the first, not in the second, but not in the third generation, and then i think that this is absolute fantasy. i say, listen, but you live in america in american citizens back and forth. well, if there is some kind of uh, so to speak, well, then, ask the japanese how it will be, yes kneading, right? for a second i say, and who are you for? well, it was clear that

their eyes widened in surprise as much as? how much, maybe they tell me spoke. well, well, how for whom, maybe the chinese? of course, they told me, we are chinese here, no wonder there, in my opinion, 2 million japanese were interned during the second world war. and what about japanese americans? yes, it’s just that simple, that is, already during the second world war. they understood that even a japanese by the fact that he is a japanese. he represents them, but the chinese. well, i don’t know, in general, someone counted how many there are, well, well, millions and millions. in general, there are practically millions more in checks. and this millions millions active lean athletic. eh, people, so to speak, well, contrary to comparison with a large mass. as i understand it, they now have problems with recruits there, that with america's excess weight, there are big problems with bad habits and so on. yes, and in this sense it is very interesting that this country, which we assume. at the very least, the strategic see themselves as a conflict with china, in which, as i understand it, they do not

see us on their side, which means, well, with a large number of these same opponents. and this is a country that has somewhere problems with money, somewhere problems with snowmen for weapons, and so on, but it, nevertheless, through the lips of some of its experts and consultants, continues to speak out. like this, please. deepening diplomatic military and economic cooperation between china russia and iran is a challenge for the us axis in china russia iran is not a formal alliance of their relationship anymore. it looks like a marriage of convenience they are united by a deep antipathy to the us-led global order here are three approaches complex pressure that will strengthen the us global leadership on russia through ukraine's membership in nato completion of the procedure for sweden's entry into the alliance and the allocation of at least 2% of its gdp for military needs by all members of the bloc to iran through a sharp increase

in economic sanctions and support for any internal instability in the country on china through the topic of human rights, highlighting the differences between us-led freedom and china-led authoritarianism, just what kind of inertia is this? here are the past thirty years, or still, there indeed, we are quite seriously sure that there are still political financial resources for all this. economic military and so on and so forth. here it is again i use this word american thought. now thought is in a transitional state. in this area. it’s clear, everyone already understands, even the general of the mile, although in fact , i think you understand, we can do more than many i’m wrong, because he understands, yes, and how much he will begin to understand in october. here's how to wait until october. here he is understanding, yes, in october he comes to us, swamp swamp thing. instead, the swamp

thing is just because it's coming a long time ago. he's already a revelation. yes, that's it. eh, everyone already understands what a unipolar world means , that's it, the era has passed. it was a short period in history so, uh, well, it was preceded by the cold war. and here's the thing , what does the main problem mean today, by the way, the article was framed this topic. eh, problem. uh, the very american strategy of analysts is that they keep thinking either in categories unipolar or categories of the cold war, but you need to study the experience. e from historical to the cold war, when this is an interesting quote, when i remember it. yes, when the state, uh, survived with great difficulty, without possessing overwhelming military superiority uh-huh, that is, uh, now they are moving to the idea that yes, the unipolar world will end up multipolar, but in order for us to continue to manage the processes in that to the extent that we consider this effective, which is sufficient for us. that

is the americans, right? uh-huh that's what we need. uh, the first second, the third fourth, but in this direction. that is, this is such a hawkish position, you understand, yes , what you need to have is overwhelming superiority in any case in the military field , therefore hasan corresponds to me. from the fact that they have the resource for this. sales to and there and there and there and there, which can be an illusion in fact, because it is naturally ignored whole line. you know such deep internal problems, uh, present in the american economy, in general, an economic researcher at the american council on foreign policy, who proceeds , you tell me, from the idea of ​​\u200b\u200bwhat america was about 10 years ago, i don’t know, but reality has already run far ahead . no one gets these ideas, you admit that she ran away , because look, he says, russia iran china is already listing these here, which means, as it were, centers of power that are no longer

a country pretending to be a gas station. at the very least, now you are also quoting the late mother. yes, like, no longer, because, well, as you can see, russia means ukraine's membership in nato. that's the first let's get some coins. misha, well, it's clear, everything, clear. yes, sweden puts pressure on everyone. by the way, gone. but among what i noted for myself, and from the point of view of the fact that it may have been the case for a long time. not only about ukraine, but about some much more global history. for us. this is in general talk about the fact that they, uh, make so much effort to draw sweden there and write a lot about the fact that biden needed this success. eh, so that, as it were, sweden ended up there, although the question itself is well in sweden what is sweden sweden in the military sense from the point of view of some kind of global confrontation, nothing of a special explanation. yes, to this here to this manic desire to include sweden in finland and so on. the fact is that now the thesis is in the west, and is developing

that the inland sea is the tactics of the inland sea. yes, there was an article on this topic today. again, this is a fix for them, even it does not quite correlate with the fact that they are going to control the northern sea route just to make the baltic an inland sea. nato this is a very image for them. you are no more than in reality, no more than a mouse, for example, but in this situation i am not interested in the swedes, who will be on yes, but in turkey, which has been there for a long time and, unlike sweden, uh, in today's world is much more complex and multifaceted. uh, let's say so for us, uh, object or subject, and on the subject yes, unfortunately the subject, in contrast from apparently the wife of today's sweden, so, uh, they write a lot about how this turkish subject was persuaded, which means our sweden, but somewhere they write that the planes have long been paid for and decided to still give somewhere they write that

like a biden, uh, that means he took 13-16 billion with a promise from the imf, and so on and so forth, uh, and i don’t know if the burnt koran about which he immediately forgot about and about the turkish pro-kursk ones, which means terrorists who immediately forgot or the price will be higher, because he has the same parliament. now, somehow, like this once and now, that is, everything is already everything, well, you need to come through parliament. and what's in there? to the parliament, and the parliament will meet before october, that is, roughly speaking, uh. i wrote for myself. today, the brain of the un is bargaining, uh , but in this sense, i'm still interested in this er, erdogan, who is bargaining with them about sweden. he is still here in his current re-elected capacity. he still bargains with him about sweden, as a country that is now again closer to their sandbox. and then this is one alignment for us. or is he trading here forecast with them, and here it is traded about something else with us. and he is still like this, as if between the drops of rain, because well, turkey

is like not sweden or finland finland but judging by the soothing ones. let 's use this epithet, judging by the soothing statement e of our officials after e, the transfer of commanders of azov from turkey and citizens of the organization banned in russia, but probably, yes, it should. this, at least, i want to proceed from the fact that erdogan will work. here on two fronts, as you said, on one sides. here he is with them to wrap the fish from the other side. he wraps another fish with us, or maybe the same uh -huh and at the same time, it’s obvious, or something, here to turn around there, he turned the motor here, no, yes, yes, yes, the fish remained. yes, tambov points is called. and what, but in reality in reality we see what is really. well , judging just by the steps, yes, and the transfer of these commanders, respectively. e

zelensky and those who support the statement that ukraine should be in nato, everything else, yes, but the construction of the bayrakt plant bayraktaram, yes which is also in our social networks on the third background of the statement that so far no one has offered him we will not bomb. yes, for some reason. yes , no one offered to tell me to be. on average, but i am still the last one, if not him, the only intermediary who, at least, has been trying and achieving something for all these years and a half. yes, the istanbul agreement has become a meme, but these words, yes, a lot, right? let's be, uh, honest with ourselves. now he wants a new mediation. now he is trying to exchange sweden for his membership in the european union. yes, that's what he said. let's, uh, unfreeze the negotiations between the eu and with turkey, which has been blocked for a long time. sweden needs rights there now, and unfrozen negotiations with the eu, given that how old are 40

years 30 of these 40 50, how easy is it for them? yes, that is, here it is not about him. so he does not trade, it's not about him. yes? well, at least. well, at least he looks like the top salesman. yes, you can see it yourself, and here i ’ll tell you about one loser and i’ll be back here ’s another eastern only for don’t go too tight, because you won’t have time very much advertising will fly shortly and cover everyone japan humiliated these themselves on this much more than ukraine o, because nato wanted to open a representative office in japan and generally pull together the nato union japan is much stronger, but comrade macron said no and said he did it no after the trip to beijing yes, therefore, not everything is so simple, but in this nato, this is the east, this feeling of loss of face, when they said for six months that there would be a representative office over a car.