described behind his back, but not yet. hold it excuse me, but why? because mr. abrahams plays golf and probably on the same course that he enjoys.

i have a record player, we need records. you will need 10.3mm ammo. yes. you already

sent your american the materials on shepard. do you want to? are you in your contact? for my source this is an opportunity to rematch the system, but i won't miss it. so, yes. how often do you contact about once every two months? why didn't i reassure you? some kind of nasty feeling i can’t get rid of it. the shrink calls it paranoia. so what

if the sea is right? and here , in these offices, along these corridors , a man is talking, who it turns out that this is the pharaoh who is holding us for this one, don’t spoil it, and i told you. said and now it works. danger tripod if you really have a mole here. the right caliber 10 mm on the air a big game yesterday the kiev regime launched a terrorist attack on the crimean

bridge, well, today there was retribution, let's listen. tonight the armed forces of the russian federation carried out a group strike retaliation with high-precision sea-based weapons at facilities where terrorist acts against the russian federation were prepared using unmanned boats, as well as the place of their manufacture at a shipyard near the city of odessa . in addition, in the area of ​​cities. nikolaev and odessa destroyed fuel storage. in general, with a volume of about 70,000 tons, from which military equipment of the ukrainian armed forces was provided. all planned strikes of targets were hit, fires and detonation on destroyed objects were recorded. today did not calm down, a massive drone strike was inflicted on crimea let 's look at the statement of the ministry of defense.

tonight, an attempt by the kiev regime to carry out a terrorist attack by 28 unmanned aerial vehicles on objects in crimea was thwarted. 17 ukrainian uavs were destroyed by air defense systems . lieutenant general buzhinsky, apart from everything other things now a professor at the higher school of economics here explain to us these blows that inflict. uh, ukraine today, it seems they did not succeed. but is it possible in principle, using the available means of air defense, to constantly defend against this kind of raid? dmitry of course you can, because, but these blows - this is not the first blow from another matter. what it is? e

most er, there were a mass attempt of 28 unmanned vehicles before. there are three by four by five. well, not one of them reached the goal, so they all successfully go astray. uh, speech i am, of course, not talking about surface or underwater drones, because the sevastopol of the bay, as far as i know, is quite reliably blocked by boom barriers. that is, uh , there, uh, on the water, uh, it’s not particularly breaking through. as for the air, you see, our rap works very well. they are muffled. they land , fall into the water, or are shot down by air defense systems . and, uh. i think it works, either the shell or it's just an anti-drone weapon, i.e. hmm .

sevastopol no, it wasn't. well, as for the crimean bridge and, uh, some statements in the american press have statements about, according to anonymous sources in the pentagon, that these a boats are unmanned? well, they are very difficult to detect and even more difficult to stop. it's really. so it's not a boat. even it's there. well, you know, i would like to wait for the official statement of the ministry of defense what kind of drone it was? because either we are the cola, or them so to speak. uh, these boats, which can, uh, operate somewhere at a distance of 600 km uh or it's uh, converted jet skis that go at speeds up to 100 km / h there carry 300 kg of explosives. that is, uh, there are means, but i

have to tell you what today's blows are. retaliation, first of all, i don't think it's the fulfillment of the president's order , which was given yesterday during the meeting of the security council, that the ministry of defense develops a proposal, well, in my experience, a proposal within an hour is not developed and, moreover, is not implemented. i think these are the production targets, uh. here are these e underwater surface drones, in the area of ​​\u200b\u200bnikolai odessa, all this was reconnoitered in advance well, even more so with the storage of fuel and lubricants. uh, 70,000 tons of fuels and lubricants is a very decent amount. uh, so i think that they will feel the lack of fuel for the next next week at least. i think, therefore, that the order of the president will be carried out and

a blow will be dealt. don't want to guess, uh where but uh, it will be applied, i think, well, the next few days, maybe a day or two or three, uh, and so on. this there will really be a blow to retribution for this terrorist attack on the crimean bridge, the second moment, which is from my point of view. this is in general. a signal to everyone, including erdogan, our wonderful partner, to export without russia. uh , grain on the black sea will not work, that is , the blow was struck not directly at the port infrastructure, but at objects that are in close proximity, well, the connection, of course. that is, uh, at any moment. if there, uh, these uh, well , the americans are right, they really refused, but they go persistent such rumors in uh social networks

that there was an agreement by erdogan zelensky, during zelensky ’s recent visit to ankara that if russia withdraws from the grain deal, then turkey will provide escort of ships with its own uh own forces. well, i think this is a signal. uh, including the turk, that nothing will work. that is, if you accompany. then there will be nowhere to load these ships, and moreover, it ’s completely technically possible, of course, of course, the only thing is port infrastructure. it is necessary to destroy not only water, but also e-e in nikolaev in the southern e. well, where in nikolaev, by the way, there is no grain grain granary, as far as i know, but here, odessa, south, uh. and the third port. uh, in general, three three ports on the black sea coast, where

is it carried out? here's uh grain shipment, uh, technical only, here's precision weapons. same calibers there. uh, daggers are not parasites. we need to conduct an uh air operation using uh, planning high-explosive bombs there, well, power there is a ministry of defense. there is, of course, with entry from the black sea. eh, i think it's all very real. if such a task is set, then it. i think it will be successfully solved. but speaking in general, on a large scale, then, of course, it is necessary to cut off ukraine from the black sea from e saved to ochakov until we take control, this is the coastal region of odesa and nikolaev. er, of course. all these attempts to carry out terrorist acts against sevastopol and

against the crimea and against the crimean bridge, to unfortunately, they will continue with one or another periodicity. therefore, i think that it has been repeatedly said at this program that the ultimate goal should be, and if this happens, then in general, then the value of ukraine for the same americans and british. it will decrease by 70 percent. from a military point of view, that was a very serious, uh, effective reminder from ukraine how do you uh control access to the black sea in russia? i don’t think that zelensky was exactly what he wanted, but as they say, thank you for reminding. well, let's take a look. uh, as russian diplomats see participation in what happened to the western powers spoke about it yesterday. uh, deputy

permanent representative of russia, he is polyansky . let's see. i have not heard any condemnation of this act of terrorism from any of the western sponsors of the kiev regime. and we have yet to figure out to what extent westerners were involved in the preparation and implementation of this terrorist attack. in particular, the british intelligence services, too much points to this. i don't know, uh, how passionate the western intelligence agencies were, but uh, we will now hear that at least the biden administration is not ready in any form, but to judge what was done against the crimean bridge and in general regular ukrainian attacks on crimea, let's listen what the secretary of state said about this, damn it. my question

concerns the blowing up of the kerch bridge. i 'm just wondering if russia claims that naval drones were involved, if they were ukrainian and if the us supports such actions, we we are following the situation on the kerch bridge, i have no special comments on this matter, so i will speak, in general, of course, ukraine decides for itself. how to wage this war is protecting your territory your people and your freedom. well, as it were, in my opinion, everything is clear. and if someone does not understand, here it is for these, especially those who are not understanding. let's hear what the, uh, security council spokesman and admiralba, we don't take it upon ourselves to determine the legitimacy or illegitimacy of the targets that were hit. ukrainians. they are fighting for their country, crimea is ukraine and we don't tell them what is a legitimate target. and what is not, they themselves determine their goals.

but you can’t say the same about strikes on russian territory, that it’s scary about strikes inside russia they made it clear to ukrainians that we will not encourage and will not allow such strikes, what we are trying to do and have been doing for 16 months is to make sure that they can protect themselves and repel russian aggression on their land, crimea is ready ukrainian territory worked in united states met with american persons. uh, that's the position. that's where you get this administration position. in general, very categorical. if you want to run away from shades, it is, well, if you want, the administration, or this, in general, this is how american diplomacy has always worked. basically, this is how american diplomacy works, but in this particular case, i think that this means that kiev gets carte blanche from this administration to do whatever

it wants, and therefore it is not by chance that it says it. yes, i don't care. who will what to say, if the mind is laid it is the commander-in-chief, uh, yes, all that no one has seen the last place in our audience to does not yet know the historical one, which, which says, yes, i do not care. if i get the chance, i'll kill any russians in any number i have, probably exactly so it's me, literally yeah, with very little variation. no, i think it's scary what's going on, uh, nah. uh, do not remember in connection with this brilliant here is a conversation is a very long conversation, but i am very short, so is the recorcina that spoke turning point action that is a huge 45

minutes. by the way, this is the next president. here, listen to me and in general there is no doubt that he will be the next president of america and he says, listen, what are you doing you understand, says the russians, as far as i know, in the last 3 years they have not killed a single american. the mexicans kill 100,000 americans every year, because the fenthenol that is packed there, uh, gets it, and so on, and 100,000 get lost in our country, and the russians are called our enemies and ugh, you are over our enemies, and the mexicans are our friends. so anyway, i'm asking a question. why no one wants to essentially discuss who is the enemy, and who is a friend, and now i would like to round off. it means that he was fighting, which means that there was no candidate for the presidency with all the leading candidates today. well, except

he said yes, because there will be e with hanita. that's literally one of these days. he means ron desantes uh, that means mickey haley uh, that scott senatorial scott. eh, that is , he spoke to many and he asked this question to everyone. especially, of course i liked it, when he put him in a very embarrassing position, because this, uh, uh, uh, florida governor without antis is being blamed for what he once said. what, well, actually, well, what is it? well, russia ukraine is some kind of conflict and so on, and then, apparently, he was shamed in some circles of the establishment, and he began to talk nonsense about what they said.

oh you bastard. yes, but i must say, what is the influence and authority of the taxon, when he said to him, listen, by the way, this is the second most important, which is a candidate from the republican party, but he told him it is that you are in one one day so it says another day. so say, and he began to correct himself and eventually. he turned out to have a more balanced and normal position in relation to russia. because he says, listen, our border is open for 3 years, 7 million illegal migrants have moved here. we take care of the border of ukraine, we will send our money to our children there. you understand what you are doing you are bringing the country to a nuclear war. and, of course, he said. well

it is so to say, he in general. in these cases, i must say a few more such people and the public mood can be radical or not? andronik thank you general reshetnikov i would like to go back to the beginning. let me ask you one more question. answer all that you want given not yet asked. well, well, uh, i don't. naturally, the answer to the application. whether the russian representative polyansky was involved or not involved in the western intelligence services and the question, from my point of view, is correctly posed and i expect that it will be taken very seriously and objectively. but let's take a second.

let's not ask this question and focus on what we know, here 's what we just discussed, what andranik spoke about, he was given relevant quotes and uh, the state department and the white house, do you think that having taken such a position about ukrainian actions, with the united states being the main sponsor? uh, ukraine , do you think that by doing so the administration of the badger takes responsibility for the actions of the zelensky regime, or is it too cool, it's going too far. no, why cool is not cool at all, these are realities. uh, how to practically anyone, when trump says that i myself, i will come to power. i will solve this problem in one day or there in one hour the war will stop, he says that the united states, uh, the current administration is really waging this war. indeed, if the united states

takes a position of not interfering, but for a day or two , everything will be over, because the europeans will not want to take it upon themselves. that's all they don't want now. they're just being forced, yeah and uh the help that comes from the united states , i think it is of decisive importance for ukraine, in fact, the administration got involved in such a proxy war, the united states, and they took responsibility. by the way, i wanted to say something about the special services. we don't know if we took part or not. well, we clearly knew and must remember that the gur works under the direct control of the british special services. they are mountains there, yes. the main directorate of intelligence earlier this budanov. so they decided that on us took the drill, they sit there. the cia is also not directly involved in all this, but

if you take maritime operations, here i am from my experience. i believe that uh here uh, the english play their uh, their uh their main role. and it's not only highly advanced, it's highly advanced. it's not just technical assistance. this is the development of the operations themselves, so we clearly know that they are sitting here, the americans are sitting there in the foreign intelligence department. yes, they are sitting there, advisers have been there for the fourteenth year. now e for an answer in odessa and fell. nicholas somehow did not notice. what kind of blows were inflicted on the hariq? yes they did during the day there were several hits and hits. so , two vip medical planes flew from poland to the prosecutor's office, where the special forces were located, not counting several ordinary planes that took these people away. eh, who, what ukrainians, or what? they took out

medical planes to vip-e, the same people were sitting there. uh, american or english special forces, they had to be saved, that is, the special services of the two countries, primarily england and the united states of america, are actively involved in development. especially. uh, well, the americans are more all the same on the army line, the offensive strategy of the tactics of the british is more on sabotage and terrorist attacks. eh, for such blows. it's just for us to be a priori specific. we certainly won't know. or only after the victory, we will find out who is what like ah if we do not have kim phill there, uh, currently, he does not report. but the fact that they participate is absolutely. the correct information is that they are sitting there, they are advisers there, not two or three dozen of them there, therefore, leonid , you are an objective person. you were in the past

head of the department of the foreign intelligence service, analytical information and. i just always really appreciate your, uh, ability to separate your personal approach from analytical facts - it's probably like a sign of a professional intelligence presence. so, as an analyst, tell me. how do you assess the arguments of admiral kerbe that, in general, crimea, from their point of view, is the territory of ukraine and if so, ukraine has the right to make decisions. what means to use to liberate their territory, what will you say in response to this, i can only say one thing, that there is something else i can say, by the way, uh, uh, the territory of, uh, other areas, they don’t formally express themselves, but they still don’t give carte blanche to actions in

in respect of belgorod in relation to. uh, other territories, definitely, yes, definitely, and they are ours. yes, without this permission. yes, let's play volunteer here. uh, russians , how are they from the corps, please. yes, we will work on it for you. we experience the great patriotic world war ii. fine, use we ourselves will tell you under what flag? it blows, if necessary, but in any case, they give carte blanche and this one, and in the crimea, they have their own clear position. we have never recognized the results of the referendum, and we are not talking about history at all. that is why kiev can calmly strike at the crimea and what objections will we have. we have always recognized the integrity of ukraine, therefore speaking now to say, do not hit crimea, because it is that, if we constantly supported this thesis, crimea is ukraine, the operation

to reunite crimea is illegal and putin ascribes this. like another crime, so we have, uh, personally, i have all the analysts here, but personally, i don't. there is no doubt that the biden administration has assumed full responsibility for the conduct of the war. they lead her. they'll be masters of cover-talking, here we are. hmm we were promised that uh this ammo. uh, as their uh cassettes will not be used blood against the civilian population. i don't know who it is for. you know the american public better than our public. this is ridiculous not for analysts. and for all the people. it's just ridiculous that we kiev promised that it would not be against the civilian population only in the most critical cases. yes, already kiev shows that it has all the cases, i apologize in quotation marks responsibly do not burst and beat themselves under donetsk beat and beat on the civilian population

blow up and blow up without paying attention to anyone kills our own people on our territory, so whitewash hmm somehow that way. e bine's this group that put him in the forefront is impossible. they are at war. eh, against russia and the remainder of the agreement. that is, because andronicus said where he really understands perfectly well that where did you guys drag us? what kind of conflict? yes? you are just fighting. you're just fighting, which is important that i can every presidential candidate. he asked them to be different from your american experience. yes, uh, what do you think, if the situation was reversed, and if someone hit the territory like that, which, let's say, america would consider its own, and the americans would be

told no, this is not your territory. it belonged to the indians or mexico, as the american president answered this kind of arguments that since someone considers it to be their own territory, now they can strike at american territory. this is a good question. i heard yesterday in anticipation about the same question and there are always difficulties. when responsible this question, but i will answer this way. we have one experience of such a direct experience. we have no connection with the americans. there is only one experience, when the soviet union deployed a medium-range nuclear missile in 1962, aimed at the united states and the american administration - this is wonderful robert kennedy wrote 13 days in this book

and many wrote about it and the american administration was preparing a nuclear attack on the soviet union and on all those who were at the club, there and so on. it's just a miracle that we agreed. i just want to say that the very fact of the threat that from the territory of the soviet union can get the capital of the east coast there are big cities. it's well, you know that, uh, if not the kennedys who are just two brothers, they defended this position, what not. well don't go crazy right away im windows and other dicks the cabinets were in favor of delivering a blow to the soviet union on our e-s. and we had no other example. khrushchev said nothing, and cuba, by the way, is a sovereign independent

country. and what other right do you have? and he was told we have that's because we have the opportunity, and since we have the opportunity. i would like to finish this differently. i wanted to make this example. there were cases when we were really very much involved in the korean war, of course, general macarthur knew that chinese soviet pilots were there. i was in dalyan port arthur a huge cemetery of our pilots. in the korean war, right? but the fact is that it was a proxy war and even being a proxy war. it's not on site. us general makar then turned to truman and said, give me permission. i

want to nuke the chinese and the soviet union, but the truth is, i must say that this tool was a sane person. he fired him, but in general there were such moods, but, because then we had participation in vietnam, so i talked, uh, with a sanatorium mccain, and he spoke. and by the way, general buzinsky was present when he was in his office. i say, listen, you're not in the general's office. and when i said you'll hear it, you must have something personal. you have it. well, the russian shot me down, and the general says , uh, senator, it's not a russian shot down by a russian missile, but the truth, when i came back i saw here on television that some man said, it's me who hits him so, well, i don’t know what i’m talking about

and in egypt we had military advisers a huge number of people our weapons and so further. i want to say proxy war has its own characteristics. here it is very important not to cross a certain line on the air big game fierce battles are taking place on the territory of ukraine ukraine is fighting with western weapons. basically, the american and the united states have already spent more than 40 billion dollars on arming ukraine, and if at the beginning they were somehow very selective about what weapons can be supplied to ukraine, now they are already giving long-range missiles and are going to arm ukraine, uh, modern military, aircraft, and so on and so on and so on, but do not think that in the white

house. does not care that escalations do not get out of hand. there sit sober people who have their own calculations and their own approach to what is required to avoid a third world war. here's how president biden's national security adviser jake salon put it the other day. why does the united states take the red lines of the russians seriously at the beginning of this conflict, president biden, outlined the american position, she was that we were going to take a big, big, bold measure to support ukraine we were going to keep the west united and we were trying to make sure everything didn't fall into a third world war with russia and i mean that american troops wouldn't fight russians outside of ukraine anywhere, and we followed these three main commandments throughout

the conflict to make peace with the development of conflicts , the nature of our assistance to ukraine changed and, of course, along the way. we've seen what's possible and what's not, i can't say that the president putin, i can say that the us position boils down to one main point, namely , we will support ukraine but will not allow an increase in american soldiers in the war with russia, and we will adhere to this throughout the conflict. well, at one time it was. uh, the famous doctrine of uh nixon, if you remember, uh, 970 , uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, abolished the mandatory conscription—the conscription of the american armed forces , among other things, to calm the anti-war sentiment among the youth and students. and secondly, he said that the united states they will, uh, help to assist countries that defend their uh, they will not fight for their independence, and there are, as it were, external

similarities. uh, between what jake salon says and what nixon and his national security adviser heinrichich were saying at the time. there is one, little difference. the difference is that when the united states took this position with respect to vietnam, they took this position with respect to a country that, although it was a socialist and had the support of the soviet union , it was the soviet union very, very far. they didn't even have common borders. uh-huh and of course, the soviet leadership wanted vietnam to win, but in general , it seems to me that it was impossible to say that it was for the soviet union, but, if you want existential interests, and then the same

doctrine, and general bykinsky, like is going to apply to the territory of ukraine a a few hundred kilometers from moscow and in a situation where russian troops are directly involved in hostilities. and uh, in light of this, i don't want to ask you. do you think jake sully's analysis of his colleagues, to do what they do, but directly, without sending ground troops, and they really guarantee the security of america that this will not go anywhere. no, of course not, but before answering your question. i just want to make a small addition about the american presence of american advisers since the yushchenko era

. i think that now they occupy, probably, two floors, therefore, in every department. well you in my case, i i'm talking about the department of defense. therefore, i think that such a demonstrative strike on the buildings of the department of defense will entail , so to speak, especially if during working hours, then there will be very heavy losses among the american personnel now, uh , answering. to your question dmitriy i think that the americans especially uh, i uh look at president biden. i repeat once again, despite all his age -related erratic eccentricities, so to speak. still, at the genetic level, he understands what e nuclear is weapon. what is world war iii? because u any again u my longstanding position that i do not change and have not changed any armed confrontation between the united states and the russian federation will end

in mutually assured destruction. mat as the americans say, which translates as madness, well, or crazy therefore. americans, uh, i watch them act, and i get the impression that they act despite all the rhetoric, despite all the loud statements. they still show up more and more. caution. look, it's going on today. uh, i think meeting 12. uh, the rammstein group where is the group in support of ukraine yes, the group in support of ukraine which is the defense ministers who determines what supplies yes there are 53 states? what kind of deliveries determines the nomenclature in quantity, when it all started, there every meeting of the group was accompanied by a drumbeat. uh, the whole press was filled with lists, there are numbers. uh

, whatever, silence now. i also looked through, uh, all social networks, but there is nothing on this rammstein group that's why, because the americans here, again, despite all these loud statements about the same aircraft. here are the same f-16 americans now. here we give permission. one of these days we will give permission to the europeans. uh, so to speak , began training these pilots. and why? because, after all, i think that the americans understood that, uh, we are talking about a maximum of two squadrons, but this is 20 aircraft, well, 25 f-16 aircraft. about the figures that the minister of defense recently announced, that from uh june 4th. that's for a month and a half, even this, given that the statement - he made it a few days ago, 21 ukrainian planes were shot down,

that is, in fact, the number that the americans. e put they can be shot down within 3 weeks. i will tell you more that our system is already recognized all over the world. well , let's be modest, one of the best. but i think that in general the best air defense system in the world in terms of its systems, in terms of its thoughtfulness, and so on, so our air defense was sharpened, if you can use this the word from the eighties to the nineties is precisely the confrontation with the american f-16 aircraft at 15-18. this is basically. big difference, that is, our uh operators are ours. uh, the servicemen of his army are doing an excellent job with them, so to speak, and moreover, what sergey viktorovich lavrov said that we will consider these aircraft as

carriers of nuclear weapons with unpredictable, so to speak, consequences. this is also taken into account by the americans, so i think they will pull to the end. now they say, well, in this offensive these planes ukrainians will not be helped. but when everything is over, then we will put it on, they also talked about tanks. true, they had to deliver them by the first of january. more than six months have already passed, abramtsev. no, after all , somehow talking about abrams. he somehow calmed down. although the americans transferred them to poland in germany, they are in no hurry to deliver to ukraine just like the british, by the way, with their own after the leopards began to burn, but in my opinion, they waved at bradley. you can't fix the situation here. they burn uh and the americans will continue to burn. they will continue to deliver. but then climb the stairs of escalation. i think americans are beginning

to understand. what is it fraught with it is fraught with strikes on the territory, so to speak, their allies and so on. they will fall. just in an awkward position, either they have to fight with russia with known consequences, or say no in the summer, guys. this is your own business, it will help in any way we can, but you are fighting yourself, and this one, so to speak, will bring down the whole concept of nato and all biden's spells that he is ready to protect every inch of his allies' territory, so i think what sulliwan says, uh, it does n't seem to me that it's his deepest conviction. it is, so to speak, an installation given to the president, because sullivan is from my point of view. he's pretty aggressive. uh, politician, but nonetheless. i think, americans, the further u go, the more successful u will be. uh, the russian grouping in ukraine, and already

in the kupyansk direction, the ukrainians are already starting to hysteria there, that there are 100,000 groups, there are 900 rszos, and the more careful the americans will behave. uh you know general we have uh, there are some stories regarding escalation potentials and how is it uh if there is a clash of russian american uh military if you want uh machines what is it? rabies will lead the third world war there was a clash. you talked about this in korea many years ago, when russian american pilots were shooting at each other, and russian, uh, anti-aircraft gunners, russian anti-aircraft weapons were very effective, and in relation to american aircraft in vietnam in egypt and so in egypt

quite right, but but it seems to me that not every russian-american clash inevitably leads. here is such a global catastrophe or in one i agree with you. what are the potential risks of such a collision so great? that, in general, i really want to hope that a person saliva on his colleagues will have enough common sense to test you a very wise statement from your country, what is wisdom? uh , what wisdom, uh, from the american side, it is increasing significantly. and when things are going well for russia on the battlefield. this is true. tell us about the battlefield. i mentioned it, the kupyat direction of the lord kupyansk was spoken only by the silyuks. i myself am from kharkiv. i

found the region in russian. it sounds, kupensk, a russian person has never pronounced, kupyansk kupyansk. here are those who are at war with us, some of them say so, this is a purely russian name, completely obeying the authority here does not attract people this direction, which not literally yesterday today uh our uh, the troops crossed. uh, well , let's say i don't call it a counteroffensive. this is uh, counterattacks turned into counterattacks have advanced several kilometers. and uh, this hysteria of the syrsky, which leads the troops. i don't really believe in these figures, because the ministry of defense. still, this does not confirm 100.000. i am grouping 100.000. the grouping is two general search armies of 50,000 each. there are 900 e-e missile systems. e salvo fire

reactivity to everyone in 2 days. there are about 5600 tanks there. you understand this is a grouping, which i always said that in order to go on a normal offensive, you need to create, uh, a normal grouping grouping, breakthrough grouping development, success and so on. determine the direction of the main and e, auxiliary strikes and e go on the offensive. i think it's still ahead. and the fact that in kupinsk, uh, our troops go over , so to speak, moreover, in successive counterattacks and win back, well, small areas of territory. this is already an indicator that not only is the ukrainian offensive fizzling out there, and not just already, uh, they are starting to lose the initiative. they've practically lost it uh russians. so to speak, the russian

resistance to the russian resistance will collapse, we are leaving for advertising, we will be back in just a few minutes. mayakovsky was it an explosion? mayakovsky was a cop's rebellion, it was a challenge, the three of us lived lilia and her husband. he was jealous of her, of course, on this basis, they constantly had scandals. she said that you can’t be jealous, as he didn’t tell her, if she were here, he wouldn’t end up with you vladimir mayakovsky’s 130th birthday today at first i want people to know the truth about my father this is all that worries me . you big

are waiting for your beauty very profitable set of cosmetics for 699 rubles. where are you female patrol for 799 rubles. find out your credit rating for free on the compare point website, we will help you choose a loan based on your current payments and credit history and check that you have no delinquencies and no one has taken a loan in your name. if the loan, then on the site compare dot ru i monitor the system. i increase the power for data transmission to all systems in the normal mode, rostelecom's smart monitoring system solves problems with the internet before they arise for you rostelecom technology opportunities without unnecessary movements in the real estate world. after all, he will help you find the best price for

you, if real estate is here. after seeing the juicy summer sale on yandex.market, buy socks from the legendary german brand with a 75% discount. the first winner of the promotion is already suitcases this sunday. your chance to win a super prize is left to millions and a trip to russia buyers. read large-scale national lottery 5.05.0 on wednesday 23 deluxe for the price of one app kfc comfort froze. now in a convenient application quickly registration everything important on the main screen, your status, the number of points, as well as many nice offers that you will like all comfort and boyle is now in the application. we deliver ozone with love frutonyanya baby food with a discount of up to 35%, and a moncher oven with a 50% discount. this is the fonbet cup

of russia on football, a large-scale spectacular real penetrating fonbet cup of russia on football, their disguise of non-exit action helps to fight inflammation of infections beauty.

here it's sales knocking on ozone on zoning you big ones are waiting for a 50% discount on men's and women's white sneakers and a 50% discount on men's t-shirts. follow yourself fun from russian lotto in the victim's mobile at any time bet on luck at work. in training , win millions without guessing a single number online stylish and powerful smartphones.

and pass on the demography to other generations of the national projection, dmitry kuleba, minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, he clearly has something to hide, we will strangle russians everywhere on every continent and in every corner of the world, a person who openly went to mi-6, in fact the head of mi-6 says that his target is the crimean bridge. if, for example, you ask me who is blowing up in the crimea, i will tell you that yes, we are a good terrorist in only one form dead where he was recruited.

this is vienna, where the career of a young diplomat begins. cuba, whose father, so to speak, gave a kick in life on the sly, takes out his family . no personal convictions. these are cynical and corrupt people. why suddenly about towards whites. they would have called there, called, as members of the project team for the destruction of their own country. and you will do what we tell you, dmitry kuleba is a liar, liar is a liar, heir, tutti tomorrow on the first and always on one tv.ru. russia yesterday officially announced its withdrawal from the so-called grain deal and predictably, and president zelensky immediately announced, but thank god

we can do without you and ivan immediately turned and , most importantly, to president erdogan. and with the proposal to leave everything as it is, only without russia, this is what he said to this presidential press secretary dmitry peskov the supreme question that needs comments from our military, because we are talking about a zone that is directly close to the combat area and without appropriate security guarantees. certain risks arise there. therefore, if something is formalized without russia, these risks should be taken into account, but here we cannot say to what extent and which countries are ready to take on these risks. even. if we take this zone, let's say, the implementation of this grain deal is no longer for whom it is not a secret of this obvious fact that this zone is used by the kiev regime for military purposes. this is a very important

aspect that should not be forgotten either. admiral carby has already explained what the united states will not do to help ukraine in this case let's hear it. you are suggesting that we simply try to break through the blockade of the actual military blockade in the black sea. and this is exactly what is happening there now. no , this course of action is not considered the only option available is this transports by land by rail in freight transport. it's more difficult and less effective. reshetnikov well, probably, russia doesn't really want either, as general bukhinsky warned about a direct naval clash with the united states. and like, if you believe admiral caribia i believe in this case. and america would like to avoid that too. uh, well, there is a turkish factor uh, do you think that

turkey can decide to support zelensky , i personally don’t think, especially since ours began to work with erdogan, these are the last line conversations. mida we are talking about. we can agree with you on the supply of grain without ukraine, and this is not any risk, which peskov spoke about the real risk and yevgeny petrovich spoke about this at the very beginning, the real risk is, uh. hmm powerful collisions and this bombing. uh, odessa is not only, but also coastal odessa and so on. well, a lot of risk arises with the turk now. i understand and today's messages are offered. if you so desire, please have grain problems with our no. we are ready to supply grain. moreover, it is not goes. everyone already knows this. is this the secret of deprivation or what? they are what african countries are practically not idiots. and it goes, uh, to europe

, maybe even to the united states, to europe . although the poles today, too, forgot, through the lips of the prime minister, they did not say that we would not let ukrainian grain in. uh, bulgarians and romanians are asking for this not to be allowed into poland. this destroys their economy, which is already nonexistent in these two countries. therefore, erdogan has. it seems to me that the consideration of that politician, although very cunning, but also smart, is enough combination. yes, he has enough of this consideration not to get involved in zelensky's adventure, and i think now russia's position in this sense of working with erdogan is an explanation. i. i think that it is possible to find a certain compromise, a certain agreement that we are ready to work. we also have levers of pressure on turkey, it's not so simple, but uh, again i want to quote uh, generals of the storm. when

you have the right military leverage, let's just say your arguments, uh, get a little more convincing. tell us. eh, what there is, uh, russia's ability to thwart zelensky's plans even if turkey reacts to them. sympathetically. i'm not talking about overpowering the turkish navy. naturally. i am absolutely convinced that our leadership also does not want a direct clash with the turkish fleet and, uh, with any other fleet, because there may be, well, the americans, by the way, uh, refused to escort 300, so to speak. this is very clear. yes? this is extremely clear, and in general the turks are still in their position on the non-admission of warships. uh, any country in the black sea has not yet changed and is unlikely to have changed therefore uh. well , today i was, so i petrovich mentioned

lavrov's conversation with his turkish colleague, whom they discussed. how can you say so to carry out this grain transaction, without taking into account, without e, without participation. here are the ukrainians, uh, the turks, by the way, uh, they don't really care about food security. there, the country of africa, they have a very powerful flour-grinding industry, so they need grain in order to load this industry and sell flour, including by the way, here, therefore, uh, what means do we have, the most logical means is to strike at the port infrastructure , primarily on the structure that is used for transshipment of grain, you can also, if we really want to, uh, the americans also say to the railway, so to speak, but transportation by rail, but there are problems there, we have different gauges, so there is