hello today, we gathered our thoughts about aurelius augustine and his confession to archimandrite semion tomachinsky associate professor, moscow theological academy alexei pavlovich kozyrev, dean of the faculty of philosophy , moscow university. i am vladimir legoyda. hello, friends. well, let's take on the impossible augustine confession before the question and how to explain or convince a modern young man? reading the confessions of augustine is a wonderful matter of your word. well, by the way, some such quotes sounded. they are very helpful. i would add here, in particular, professors also of moscow university and the moscow theological academy, he is vasilyevich popov, he remarkably has huge studies of the blessed goose. and he says that augustine was marked by such a shining seal of genius, which are not born

in every millennium, that is, it seems to me that they should somehow heed, by the way, saying professor ivan vasilyevich he was a paralytic of the saints, this holy martyr. but if these arguments don't work, then we'll ask pavlovich. i don't know. i think we should just take confession and go down to the subway and read. here young people pay attention to who reads what. i remember one time i was driving and i needed to get ready. why re-read the eleventh book to correct, i took the edition, where there were two texts confessions of augustine and er, the history of my disasters. of course he was sitting next to me. eh, the man is a man. here, who told me what kind of disgusting subtracts. how can you read this lecherous swindler. augustine is a completely different matter.

you see, that is, it turns out that people in the subway do not just pay attention to who reads, but also give a moral assessment. that's why be an advertisement, i read, augustine's confession and others will also read beautifully. well, a few words about augustine before a we, but let's move on to a wonderful text. confession about times 1,000 years. after all, a person really determined correct me if this is too categorical , but he determined, uh, the intellectual religious philosophical development of western european thought many, many centuries ahead before the appearance, that is, augustine is 35430 years of life, and even before the appearance of thomas of queens before thirteenth century comparable figure. well, no. or everything will work out. so it is in western european thought. if we say, well, in general they say, yes, uh, western thoughts on

the change of august hell. walks with a robe. e a fan of aquinas e, albert the great and all theology for a millennium is augustinian theology, but not only theology. here i am, after all, a philosopher, and i cannot but note that, generally speaking, the very understanding of history, yes, christian history, it comes from blessed augustine, because it was he who said that the child comes to replace the circus with the whirlwind with the via rectom a straight path. and when we talk today about the direct path of the progress of time, uh, indirectly or directly, do we remember the blessed man, because for him history is seven centuries of world history, 7,000 years of world history according to christian revelation. these are seven stages. yes, where is the sixth stage this is history. here is the boogo of the incarnation. here are the appearances of jesus christ and

the last judgment, and the seventh stage is already eternity. yeah so here we stand on in this penultimate stage of jonah world history and think about what awaits us next. ah, civilizations of love. uh, amaris horde. e or the apocalypse or maybe some other final denouement of world history, but one way or another , this is the bliss of father john, after all, one of the most probably famous phrases, why am i talking about this at the beginning, because she doesn’t from confession, yes, but which requires an explanation of love and do what you want. augustine that's how to understand it in general, well, in his confession one shakes his completely alive feeling of communion with god yes, absolutely uh, motionless. here are some strict rules for concepts, then it is in development all the time. actually. confession itself is the same after all.

eh, understanding it is such a creative understanding of your life of your searches. he is now sold. although he already writes, being bishops. yes, although his face is 40, in my opinion, yes, when the end is written, yes, yes. well, he is on the lookout. yes, he doesn’t have a frozen scheme, and he, through his and such a vivid experience of coming to christ, and he comprehends , uh, and in general, all reality. yes, that is, as if genius in what he managed to combine his subjective experience with the universal. yes, through the prism of his personality , he can see and name some ontological meanings, but he does not impose this on anyone. this is the meaning, that here is your entire confession from fellowship. eh, it begins with the living god. yes, great lord, yes, and everything is stitched. that is, it's not just that he talks about his life about some kind of delusions and his falls, his searches,

but he, as it were, at the beginning to god and then through god to us. so this is a long conversation. with god a and all pasha but still this phrase. eh, love god yes, but love there, if literally and do what you want, she's so dangerous, because, as they say, the soviet scoundrel man. he will immediately lean towards the second part, whatever you want. come on, i remember sergei sergeevich who said that asceticism is the passion of renunciation of passion. maybe the father is smart, er, he will criticize this statement of our outstanding philologist. but uh, what to say augustine was. eh, a man of the highest intensity of passion and his refusal to i drink the goblet of life to the dregs of this glow from living out life in full, as ivan karamazov said.

yes, here, this is also uh, a feat based on uh, big. e, energy, love of god after all, augustine himself works with this word. if we remember the beginning of the third book. he writes. i arrived in carthage and shameful love boiled around me like a goat. and i have not yet loved and loved love. so in the russian translation, yes, that is , i did not yet have true love, and therefore i became attached to carnal love to physical love, but this is also my own for augustine. a kind of love, that is, augustine does not say that it is not love at all. it's not about, yes , it's love, but love, reflected in the crooked mirror, love, reflected in the mirror of original sin, where a person, uh, is carrying

this burden. this load of sin does not know what true love is, because in his eyes there is an elm, in his eyes there are clouded glasses. that's why, of course, augustine is a philosopher of love. and when he says love and do what you want. he does not mean the shameful love that seethed in carthage. and he was then seventeen years old. well, yes, he arrived, and you understand what seventeen years is? yes, young men, when everything boils. yes, when he is looking for where to spit out on his e, energy, that's why yes indeed, this is a philosopher of love, but e, after all, in russian we call a lot of phenomena the word love, while in e, italian there is amor there is carris. yes, that is love mercy love compassion love pity that always surprised every time. and when i reread

the confession, i have such a habit of rereading it every great lent. what well for some time now, when he speaks, and already that connection is quite strong, which he has formed. it was not a family at all, but here he tied himself with a woman, and he judges himself very harshly for this. yes. he says that passion was seething in me, that it was not such a not real wrong distorted love there, but how he delicately writes about this woman. he never reproaches her for anything, they never even mention the name of the name, something amazing like that. i don't know gentleman is a weak word, yes for yes for all that it wasn't some his promiscuity. it was a monogamous union, yes, which , in general, well, in roman law, uh, was even recognized as a law and in a sense, concubinage, of course, it does not fully correspond to marriage, but, in principle, if a person kept fidelity, uh, to one's own, so to speak , to a spouse, then this is the only thing that

this was not formalized legally, but in fact. it was on the stage of the future of marriage, so it was not some kind of debauchery. yes, with whom i still want, bye. we didn’t cross directly, lord, but with one figure it out in a moment. and we always speak russian about huseyn blessed a and i have met people who are even surprised when you say no. well, st. augustine says he's not a saint, he 's blessed, yes . and there is basil the blessed yes , of course, augustine was not blessed in the sense in which we speak there, like he is definitely yes, absolutely no, a very rationally thinking person. that's right. but that's right. i understand these semyon that this is the result some suspicion of this, that's to western thought. yes, and although it is with us, because in the greek calendar it is written about st. augustine yes. yes, and indeed. i think it's more of a distant historical tradition, because beatus. yes, it

sounded palatine, it was not a designation of some genre or some special kind of holiness. and that's what they called the sanctus. and even the saint of constantinople is already there. yes, uh, as agios da called it, that is, it's just yes , really traditions and roots. doesn't have relationship. he is a saint in fact, yes, if in a good way, yes, but we also have a blessed irony from tridon, yes, who is also definitely a completely holy fool. i have a thoughtful scholar of scripture preacher. and and so on, which, by the way , does not have any special claims against him from the side of orthodox teachings, yes, that's why it's clean. yes, they are historical traditions. i think it would be nice to fix this as well. i think it's a serious statement. today we have gathered our thoughts about aurelius augustine and his

confessions to alexei pavlovich kozyrev, archimandrite simeon tomachinsky i vladimir grigoy, we continue augustine well , as they say in textbooks and dictionaries in encyclopedias, he creates the genre of autobiography, yes, in european culture, but it’s even something more, so how would he turn here to a wonderful russian literary theorist and philosophers mikhail mikhailovich with pleasure, who in the aesthetic activity of the author distinguishes uh, two, type, uh, biographies of autobiography and spain, and this depends on who this text is aimed at, and biography is always focused on the other. that is, it is a look at ourselves, but in front of each other. i describe myself as my descendants, my dear friends, would like to see me. some virtual interlocutors and what is important for them e. well, here, uh, relatively speaking,

i describe some of my romantic adventures there. let's say, or uh, intellectual activities with three with three to lift myself up for the audience that i show myself to. confession is uh, it’s completely different here, not you, nor the other is significant, but your inner is significant, i, that is, i, as it were, are turned inside myself, this other is the spirit in me , which is the divine beginning, yes, that is, i try to be as honest as possible, but here's the paradox, i again resort, here to the language that everyone uses the rest, which is accepted in the society spoken by other people. e, which is spoken, for example, by my co-religionists, members of my community. yes, people standing next to me in church, so i can't wordlessly confess. i confess. uh, i use those speech

practices that have been tested and approved by society. it is also very interesting as it refers directly to god from the first page - it created us for itself. yes. the most famous phrase may be, and our heart will not rest until it finds you. and this motive runs through the entire confession. that is , it is not just some kind of internal there. yes, this is before god, god is completely different. but after all, it ’s completely different, you can think like who art in heaven, yes, and you can think like that which is in the depths of your own heart, because the heart is the central place in a person where communion with god takes place. that is, it is the biography of the soul. yes, probably, of course, this is not an autobiography that we write on our profiles, of course, but uh, really, how do we remember, uh, i remember how we passed. confession, uh, well, philology is aware of world literature. eh, he is the founder of a whole large genre,

such an autobiographical confessional prose, yes, in its purest form. it seems to me that there is little autobiography where i met all the same, if we remember. and this is the same rousseau there to test tolstoy no matter how they there were confessions for centuries, there were soybeans and so on, but always. this is a confessional moment. it is present, yes, that is, not just, but a story, but no one is interested in just listening to what happened to you there, but it is really the life of your soul that is interesting, and in this sense, augustine, of course, a unique person, how did he even decide to do this i must say that he did not himself, but came up with, right? come on, i’ll write a biography for you now, then i’ll go through it all the same, yes. he also asked for things. yes? e peacock, yes, if not wrong on on on lana da asked write for other generations for for us. uh, write he wrote for a narrow circle, he says there, uh, i write to the human family. e, no matter how small, this circle is those who will read this book,

that is, he thought that these would be some chosen ones who know him well and are not so important to him. here is the outline of his life, which, in principle, is known. and how the providence of god acted at every moment of it , because this is the essence of why, when we read confession e, we are charged with some an extraordinary new look at ourselves and the world, because we see that every second the lord is present, that is, in this sense, of course, augustine is absolutely unique and a pioneer. i would pay attention to the fact that towards the end, the confession, as it were, completely thins out and disappears. e plot outline. yes yes. yes , his mother monika dies yes, too. it's amazing how he continues to think about the memory of time about the old testament, but there is no longer a plot. yes, and you know what shocked me all the time. i'm finishing school. i read a teenager dostoevsky a. there, right at the beginning , the hero narrator will remember, he says, you need to be too

meanly in love with yourself to write about yourself without shame, and for me it was. well, here's a revelation. i wrote it down in my diary. dostoevsky got me so sunk, and in my first year, in my opinion, i just read the confession for the first time and then babkin perfectly expressed this in one article. he said augustine writes about himself, but not about himself. he writes, that is, for dostoevsky or for his hero it is not clear how one can write about oneself without shame, but for augustine and this is the main paradox, it’s generally incomprehensible how you can write about yourself, because he always says that without you i’m like not, how can it be in the abyss, right? leader leader himself in a simpler way, yes , absolutely. i would like to support the idea of ​​alexei pavlovich that these are actually these different layers and confessions. after all, they follow from the name itself, yes confessions, that is, confession. this is not only a story about their sins with repentance, but this is a confession

of faith yes, which are in the tenth chapter goes, uh, and uh, confession, as the glorification of god. yes, confess to yourself, lord, here we are singing. yes, a psalm, is that, you know, that you need to run, there is an urgent collision? no, of course, this means that you glorify god in his deeds and, of course, the main character. augustine's confessions are the very lord. this is obvious. yes, that is, here he shows how personally in his e life in his destiny. the lord took part, but, thanks to this, we can each look at ourselves. here from this angle of view, that is, this one, uh, actually spices fly. yes, this look under the loving eye of the father. and our palace. this, of course, it seems to me the main value of confession, well, in general, of course, there are such moments that you read. here, when one of the most famous episodes of yes, when he says, now i understand that when i asked god there in my youth or in my youth to save me from some kind of passion, yes, then i said, well, yes, but not now

to get rid of it, but then now there is this, of course, well, it is impossible not to respond to this, but at the same time, there is a question. here, too, more than once. yes, and discussed whether augustine is too strict about himself. even though he doesn't seem to appreciate himself. yes, i write to myself. well, look at what the niche stumbled on. this is the famous pear episode. yes, when augustine writes in detail. so they climbed into the garden as teenagers, and he directly says so and they stole these pears that we did not need. we weren't hungry and i loved that's just the evil itself. here in this yes for the sake of evil.

says something bad that you need to get rid of it. need to fix it. we must try to be better. this is already an aspiration good. that is, he wants to get out of the twilight from the darkness. he fully understood himself with his mind, because here he has some kind of substantive disagreement, yes , and either he psychologically does not believe in sincerity. here it is, but the episode. well, nietzsche for me

is a blind man, uh, who uh, here he is in darkness and you don’t need to get out of it, because he has already chosen the party of darkness. that is, uh, all his desire to overestimate the value of rewriting the gospel, uh, backwards. what did zarathustra say? this is parody gospel, this is a parody of gospel values, christ still does not let him go. understand four parts. these are the four evangelists. yes, that's why, well, of course, for a person who is accustomed. to steal there they do it with ease. here with gracefully. yes, here on the highway he seizes money from people. he believes that this is how it should be, that, in principle, there is nothing wrong with this. and in this elegance. he finds even, uh, some kind of pleasure. here's some kindness. that's why the

suffering of augustine is incomprehensible to him, but i understand because once he came to me. uh, here in every e in every village in every village there is. well, such a village idiot or a sick person, and here it is once. uh, such a person came to my grandmother. here, and he worked there somewhere in the army with radiation, grabbed a large dose of radiation in his youth. and such a blessed one did not work anywhere, and he began to cry that he still cannot forgive himself, as at the age of six, he killed a frog. for him, this act of killing a frog is eternal, now you understand, no matter how you repent, no matter how you i didn’t live out of myself. this is it, but you did it, and therefore, in a semantic way, it abides in your spiritual life. he is also for augustine it would seem for a believer. well, i went to the temple. well, i repented. well, he stole

pears. the priest has released everything to you. it's like you didn't steal them. no, you stole. that is what memory is. but about it remains. that's what the merchants will say. here, augustine is not only in relation to himself, but is so strict. he's talking about babies. yes, these are the famous episodes, watching the baby. you see how he is already there jealous, how he cries, because he is jealous of his brother, and so on. that is, these sins of passion manifest how they are born in many ways, yes, even thanks to the depravity of human nature. they act already from birth, so he, as it were , states, as a sharp-sighted observer, as an honest researcher. he sees yes. e in the danish kingdom some kind of rot was formed. e, and already it is and the main thing is to see it, and cry and move on. yes, that's why you love god did what you want, because you can't get stuck in this too. yes they

get stuck. what, he didn't understand anything. he did not understand christianity. he even said, uh, the casuistry of sin, the inquisition of conscience , these are all his crazy expressions in relation to christianity. we all have our own in russian. so this is fedor mikhailovichsky. here is dostoevsky somewhere in this inner consciousness of sin. everyone is to blame for everyone. yes. this is , in general, even in latin the concept of broadcasting pikachet, that is, the transmission of a reversal sin. and dostoevsky understands that sin is the bush in which we stand we are all yes and uh in general, a person uh, he has nowhere to go, except for one, except for the straw that is served to him from heaven, except for grace, which can suddenly snatch him out of this abyss of sin, where it’s not like one tortured baby, but where a lot of tormented babies cries out, and world harmony, here, uh, and in this regard, dostoevsky e. it seems to me not

so much an orthodox eastern writer. how much western i just now thought a little about something else, to say, somehow everything began to resist in me about because dostoevsky is our augustine, but i remembered. here it's about love. eh, the elder zosima, when he speaks, is in the chapter. eh, like a lady, i guess. yes, when he says that nothing can be proved here. she's there to complain. yes , but you can be convinced by the experience of active love. you begin to love people and measure how you will succeed in love, you will be convinced of god's mercy. somehow close to textures. this is in a sense also augustine is very similar, indeed. yes, but what amazes me most is his geese. here it is. uh, the world openness opportunity. e k learning, what is called yes, to self-improvement, to learning new things and in himself, including he is not afraid , here are some abysses even, yes

, fix and say in himself, but thanks to you , lord, uh, i can defeat it, yes, that is to correspond. i'm not wrong. he rewrote. uh, writing your own rules, then changing your point of view. he rewrote them. just edited. yes, and it finds reviews among modern people as well. here we are today talking about how you can bring to confession here, please, heat in depardieu yes it would seem. well, where is the actor. you know that he read public confessions. and in general, he came to god. he himself spoke about this thanks. lord blessed augustine, and it so happened that in moscow we crossed paths with him. he played the main role in rasputin there, by the way, a very adequate one , he was quite organic in this role. i asked him, i say, but it really happened. he says yes play and after that he read the tape to her. uh, in notre dame de paris, he reads. confession is

generally a fantastic thing. then he drove around all of africa with these public readings. he was then imbued with, by the way, russian citizenship and was baptized into orthodoxy and baptized into orthodoxy. yes, just in case, well, it all started with augustine with his confession, therefore, that's what it is modern. what other authorities? what other examples can be given? avril augustine and his confession continue the topic on which we gathered today with the thoughts of archimandrite simeon and alexei pavlovich kozyrev vladimir legoyda. now i always remember where he is about hatred, he says how much to our moment. he says, is not hatred more terrible than the enemy himself. well , more precisely, he is convinced that hatred is much more terrible than the enemy, the hatred that corrodes you from the inside. it brings you more evil than any of the most terrible external enemy. it's so modern. it's like this hmm right today hmm yeah well hatred doesn't

mean they wanted to. uh, ivan ilyin also talked about this about resistance, zlouina. well, at the same time he allowed the death penalty and augustine was severe against it, yes, but he constantly did everything in his life, now with mahimi, then with the montanists, then with the pelageans. that is, in fact, it existed in the atmosphere, the confrontation of the church is, right? various people said that if they are already punished for asking for some domestic crimes, then how they don’t punish , yes, and such an idea in him is met with heresy, which harms the soul, and by the way, there is also a lot to say about this from the augustins, which is only did not happen, then protestantism and a lot. well, because luther was already an augustinian monk, when he interprets, uh, the gospel commandment, uh, christ yes, to love your enemies, so, in my opinion, bernard of flerhof spoke about how, by chance, you need to hug them. come on, that we must

appreciate and respect them and choose worthy enemies for ourselves. in general, in my opinion, this is an augustinian idea that such love for enemies does not at all mean forgiveness mercy of mercy. here but this is a fight with worthy rivals worthy of almost homer it seems to me that this is more of a big antique, of course there. quite a few ancient augustine generally stands on the shoulders of ancient philosophy. how did his spiritual awakening with a hydrangea, that is, here is the text that he read the price of, uh, the great politician, rhetorician and philosopher stands, that is, here is the stoic spiritual, uh, which offers a person certain practices of the practice of abstinence of the practice of, uh, patience. yes, from araxia not indignation. this, too, is a spiritual life. well, there was a book where he compared experience. uh, tables and uh, christian

ascetics. yes, like two such types, er, education, pedagogy. so, uh, augustine stands on the shoulders of ancient culture. this, of course, is christianity, which does not reject antiquity, like tartullians? yes, what is the athens of jerusalem yes, which reigns in antiquity? i have e. forgive such a frivolous story completely. i once read a course, uh, four biographies of augustine, francis thomas and luther well, i said that augustine, in the philosophical sense, he, of course, is a follower of plato but thomas aquinas is aristotle i say there is even such an expression thomas baptized aristotle well and in general said and said, it seems to me that this figuratively beautiful. clearly i'm walking down the corridor, almator to meet me the professor of the department of philosophy, speaks in a league. what are you telling the students there? i say, and what is it? a girl came to take her means a question of medieval scholastics. and

mcqueen. well, i say answer. she says, well, thomas aquinas is the pinnacle of development from classical thought and so on. well, that is, well, what else says she was baptized. she says, where does he come from, dear child to us, says the league, he said this at a lecture. well, i told him we laughed. he says never talk to students in metaphors so very dangerous yes, but he is not only augustine the heir of antiquity, which is undoubted, but he himself, one might say, the founder of many super-modern ideas. i remember we once published. but the funds of the monastery many times , by the way, handed over the confession of the blessed goose, and then they come to me, uh, to decorate or an artist, and he was so fond of all sorts of fashionable philosophical currents, he says, i'm shocked. these are generally some super-modern concepts of time. come on, that's it, augustine is memory. yes? now this is what he writes about. these are our non-physiologists

leading all this to explore cherneigovskaya. there in america there is physics, but serious, so to speak, reads reflections on time. yes, that is, he also managed to formulate what we live in now, but some modern ones. eh, bright theories, well, there you can find dk walking around yes, the idea, of course, exists, too, diverges. the first thing you understand, right? i understand that this is a two-way relationship of faith and knowledge, which tries on different positions of contradiction, of course, this is, uh, well, the basis of european philosophy as well as plato and arrest about which we are thinking, dear friends. here i spoke with you and spoke, but time is an inexorable time, about which i wrote how interesting. i have a final question for you. and today we mentioned that the tradition of this genre, yes, and the confession, in general, it

was established by augustine. hmm. yes, but there are many other authors who wrote with such titles as rousseau or tolstoy or with others? and here i am on this issue is not missing. who else would you recommend reading? me come to the head. e, russian e, philosopher and theologian. uh, vladimir nikolaevich ilyin, whom i was engaged in was friends with the whole widow, he has a text of what he experienced. here it was published recently in one of the collections of the alexander solzhenitsyn house of the russian diaspora, amazing in strength. text, very powerful here man. ah, the talented sufferer. well, if we speak from the same sphere of russian religious philosophy, of course, self-knowledge, self-knowledge, berdyaev, a very bright text, i think, but one of the best philosophical works that goes far abroad philosophy. this is simply the confession of such

a living, tremulous and experienced person. thank you great penitential eve andrew of crete wrote for himself. well, i didn’t write so that we would later in temples. great lent, there 4 days e first er, read it. no, it was his personal repentance, a personal experience. e your fall, your departure from god and the goodness of god, and again. here he managed to combine the personal with the universal in the same way as he managed to treat the blessed. yes, the subjective with the universal. e. here. it seems to me that this is absolutely analogous, that is, readings for the summer are scheduled. thank you, dear friends, see him docent of the moscow theological academy alekseevich kozyrev, dean of the faculty of philosophy of moscow state university and vladimir olga home. today we gathered thoughts about the great augustine and his

confessors. hello here literary tackle. let them not speak, let them read. my name is dmitry buck. today we will talk about a person who, uh, is not only a great poet or playwright, but a person who has made a huge contribution to the national culture and demeanor throughout his life and in the style of fashion this is vladimir vladimirovich mayakovsky this year. we are celebrating the 130th anniversary of his birth and today we are talking about mayakovsky with our wonderful guests. this is marina mikhailovna krasnova, head of the department of the house of the pointed-eared house in tubes in the museum, which bears the proud name of the state museum of the history of russian literature named after vladimir

ivanovich. hello marina from anton dmitrievich buglak, actor of the satire theater hello anton hello, let's start, perhaps the most important thing. what does it mean for modern man mayakovsky it seems to me close, just to any young generation , with its sincerity, with its e, teenage or youthful maximalism. maybe harshness, yes, yes, sometimes harshness , like this, uh, this, probably, youthful youth remained in him. eh, until the end of his life, it is certainly absolutely projected in his poems, the young agree. i absolutely agree. it is surprising to me that there are such personalities who every year more and more bulge in terms of popularity. ranevskaya mironov vysotsky, including mayakovsky, there are a lot, and the group of public social networks that fill up is performed and

this is not e. well, let's say, it's not just a stylization, like, well, there any 13-year -old girl, being in st. petersburg, takes a selfie, two crayfish of the well and writes brodsky knows something, she doesn't understand anything, what is it , well, a ford. so bad, maybe she'll come. here is a slightly different moment, it seems to me that if we remove ideology, in general, from this poetry, which is now difficult to perceive for young people remains. eh, lyrics, very early sincere with this, probably catches and, probably, some kind of satire. that's for me personally a lot of satirical, well, perfectly fine thesis. anton is also touched by the younger generation, so some kind of fire in his heart. well, it's necessary, you think, who is there? it seems to me that this gives the right to remove? this superficial reverence, when at school they say it's like this, so it's like this, but

really a young man reads and he likes it, and he treats him like a contemporary. well, indeed mayakovsky is the author of such absolute discoveries, for example, rigid there are only three systems of all expansions, only three rhythms. one such skill doses. the fruit of a short science, rest in peace, not forcing my hands to peru, but the second pushkinsky my most honest uncle ruled, and finally, listen, comrades, descendants of the throat agitator, it was mayakovsky who came up with a new system of versification, and it is completely different. well, let's try to read. i remember a wonderful moment, as if like this in mayakovsky accent verse. i remember a wonderful moment before me you appeared, yes, it's amazing, but the extraction from the traditional russian verse. eh, absolutely. new notes. well, marina, but still, if we talk about mayakovsky earlier, then poetry

is dissolved in his other skills. he's not only a poet and not so much a poet. he still does not know himself as a poet. he is studying to be an artist. he is looking for himself in the profession. he doesn't really understand yet, the artist. he, but he wants to be more than just an artist. he also positions himself outwardly as an artist. he wears uh, hmm jar jacket, that's where it comes in handy. us his images earlier with this unthinkable tie. it's all poverty from poverty, on in fact, yes, at first. but i think that this is also a search for some kind of external identity there, because and what do teenagers do, for example, at the age of 17-18 they dye their hair in different colors, and put on earrings and or what -something completely unimaginable lighthouse clothes does the same. he is looking for himself in the same way. well, this is mayakovsky and what kind of poems does he write anton let's maybe

read, maybe the most famous poem of genius, i'm not afraid of this word. we could. yes, of course i i mean, could you. i immediately smeared the weekday map by splashing paint from a glass. i showed on a dish of jelly the oblique cheekbones of the ocean on the scales of a tin fish. i read the tongues of new lips. and you? nocturne could be played on the flute of the drainpipes short genius poem what's here? the main thing is that the artist reports his brains to the canvas. yes, here he smeared the map of everyday life, that your jackson shelves, yes, which splashes paint, but such an absolutely avant-garde artist, which is why nocturne is played not on flutes and