[000:00:00;00] on the s-300 complex, the militants tried to hide the air defense system in the nikolaev region near the settlement of the green guide, the position was opened by russian fighters, su-34 bombers , hit the equipment with guided missiles. aviation fighters of the southern group of forces repelled six enemy attacks. the west has chosen ukraine as a pawn against russia, while a criminal regime rules in kiev, serving exclusively the geopolitical interests of the united states and its allies, which are waging a hybrid war against our country to the last ukrainian, this was stated by russia's permanent representative to the un vasily nebenzya, speaking at a meeting of the organization's security council. i want to say on the streets of ukrainian guys pushes them into cars and even without basic and military training sends meat assaults on

russian military fortifications and peaceful minefields, not counting as unimaginable victims. and our former western partners only cheer zelensky and his clique supplies them with weapons and demands the continuation of this meat grinder. today, no more than 29 million people live in the country. but their western sponsor does not feel sorry for ukraine at all, because, as the polish president put it. duda russia can now be defeated cheaply, as i quote the american soldiers do not die, according to non-benzia, the strange west does not risk anything other than the supplied weapons. otherwise, they would have allowed zelensky to conclude a peace almost agreed upon last year on very

favorable terms. on the one hand, it is certainly individual, on the other side. there are, some of it can be enlarged like that. if you want, where some communities are created, but in the most primitive concept, you know, there someone will look at the shape of the nose or something else, and i know who it is why but because the majority of ethnic groups were formed in historical e, not very distant times, when some small group of people may have been relatives, having separated from a larger group of people, but then gave rise to such a large colony of a group of people, tribe , people, and so on. this means that inside ethnos, and people have a relatively greater number of common mutations of change. with each other than outside this ethnos, this makes them similar in a certain sense, hence it necessarily follows.

that's what, that ethnically specific to the general sets of some changes in dna once again in no way, not affecting the mind, beauty and all the other things that he said are very worried, they can affect the manifestations of some, and how - a malicious mutation manifests itself on the one hand, and on the other hand, these same properties. the same general background can affect to what medicine a person or people from this group will respond best to you podcast schrödinger code and i host grigory tarasevich together with my colleague, a cat guy and our today's guest konstantin severinov doctor of biological sciences professor and we are talking about the project 100.000 russian genomes, correctly i understand that when will be. a large amount of the genome has been read, it will be possible to go to a regular clinic and the doctor will prescribe pills for me

and they will take them into account. eh, who am i ethnos mine or personally to him? i think that's the way it should be believe that well here in this ideal world. of course, this will just be enough. in general , your genome is already, when you were born, your genome is already with you. so i’m sure that it will, of course, be determined and will be part of your medical record, and regarding this genome given to you by god, or rather by your parents, you will then see how in the course of life that you still have some new mutations then in the course of life, which, for example, lead to leukemia. more to what to cancer here, but, ideally, it should be like this a the future is most likely limited no technology. as such, because, well, for $1,000. if it is possible to scan, then , probably, soon it will be possible for 100 and probably there will be enough money to store all this, but it will all be limited, but the quality of analysis and education. whose problem is this not russian? this is a problem of the whole world, that is, in america, where, for example, all this is very highly developed and there, uh, the leaders of the medical industry groan and say that doctors don’t know anything about this, most of

the doctors who are now treating. they were in medical schools in the nineties. and the fact that what we are talking about actually happened, well, literally 10 years ago. they don't know anything about it and they need to fix it. uh, educational programs for doctors. it's very hard, going back to knowing my personal or your personal genome , it will be possible to say that there is a tendency to uh to have a heart attack, so you better live a very strange thing, because all this is statistical data. and here we are living in the real world. and if this one hits the wall with a bomb, this is a certain fact with him difficult, how to argue here is incredible. yes, uh, most of the uh, data that comes from this kind of analysis , they're not good to call them horoscopes, it's very wrong to do that, but they're still predictions, because they give you a probability if it's said that given your particular genome, the likelihood of such and such

a disease is increased. let 100 times. you probably being, if you had a chondriac, you can be very upset, but if it turns out that normally the probability of this disease is very low, for example, five cases per million. that, if in your particular case, statistically , after analyzing a huge number of people , it turns out that your probability of getting sick is 100 times higher. this means only 500 million for you specifically. whether it is necessary after that to go to be killed, and the wall or just to relax, for example, is a separate question and whether, for example, that is, it is necessary or after that to make some fateful decisions, is a separate issue. whether you want this information to reach your employer is a separate issue. do you want the pilot, uh, who drives the passenger aircraft, and so that he had a lowered average risk of sudden stop of death. it would seem that there is a sudden cardiac arrest and death, but it would seem that

this would not happen to him, but even if in the case of the genotype it is associated with an increased risk , it is still a hundreds per million, sort of, like this particular person. it makes no sense aha to refuse work. statistically , yes, there are not well, there are situations when it is even clear what to do, but, in my opinion, the most classic example is from phenylke. yes nuria who define, well, it's very classic, but it's also very, very unique. that is, there really is a genetic disease, when if you do not know that you have it, then you will die in a young state. and if you change your diet, then you will live happily for as long as you like. just then you will pass this same gene to your offspring, and just in case, i will repeat what was discussed. there is such a disease as phenylkeria, which, including in russia , is scanned during infancy, and they directly say, here you have it, while it does not manifests itself in no way, it sits somewhere in the genes, and

somewhere already in adolescence it turns into a terrible disease that can be prevented by fairly simple diets not fatal. quite tasty even. and here's an example of how to study. well, the disease can be prevented. do you want to know? here it is, but it's important to know, because in this case it's a simple disease, because it can be prevented by diet, no matter how it is caused. the problem is that you don't cure a lot of diseases or predispositions that are revealed as a result. well here's an array of analysis of full gene data, they are not the majority almost all of them are not like phenylketonuria. in the sense that there is no valuable advice on what you should not do. well, apart from smoking and drinking. eh, well, and so on it is impossible to give you. well, for some reason, follow more, maybe, yes, but let's still touch on this one. an ethically complex topic like genome editing is about to be born. i have a conditional child. you looked at its

genome and compared it with your giant base. he has a tendency, i don't know why i don’t know bad about gastritis, but gastritis , you can live with gastritis. let's schizophrenia is also difficult to live, and even can be very talented. here, well, yes, let him have an inclination. let not inclination. let this child break and have a severe genetic disease. so let's sharpen it, yes, the guys have already developed, yes, that is, we already don’t go to kindergarten there, so, as a rule, most of this kind of disease manifests itself so early that everything happens before kindergarten before kindergarten. we saw what he has. god forbid, of course, there is such a legal illness for anyone. can we somehow undermine, correct its genome in order to eliminate this disease, you know, when it's too late to drink borjomi, so in this case , whatever it is, there is one problem, and this kind of disease that you are talking about, they are usually born i.e. they come from their parents. come on, when

parents are a carrier, and some unsuccessful version of the gene and the other gene is normal. we are all dubbed. we have these 6 billion letters three from dad three from mom and dad and mom give us the same set of genes with prints on their own. so we each have two. and everyone's gene. well, we give children one by one such a special process. here, it’s essential that if dad was a carrier of a certain unfortunate mutation in one genius, but he didn’t know about it, because the other gene was normal and mom was the same, then it’s right according to the law of the cop or as it teaches at school. it seems to me that it still teaches that every fourth child in such a marriage will receive two unsuccessful options. of the same gene, and this can lead to very serious consequences. here, in principle, at the level of in vitro fertilization. it is possible to solve this problem in this way, that is, it can be allowed to develop not for any embryo, but only for one that does not contain a double copy of the use. double