i took it and when you took it, you can do something with it, while you are talking, you can’t have a bad folder. she's something terrible here black ugly you will all suffer because of this folder. that's why it's always the first step. yes , about this one here is what to take your hands when in the picture she is driving here, everything is fine there. yes? well, it's slow. wait , you're driving yourself on the map. well, how then are these here who i understand, who is holding the wheel for me. and how did you sit down such a picture . so you see, yes it goes, how can everything how everyone is chasing, and i'm behind quietly, just manage. i did not finish my studies because of envy, and now 3 years have passed. i am not sure that i will be able to sit even the most proud steering wheel with an instructor. she traveled the playground. she passed. well, listen, look, then , this is also a request for control, maybe for control

and when you and this is who traveled in the mountains by car in the mountainous regions , he knows for sure that sometimes you go, it means over a cliff. you sit, there is someone driving a car, you sit. ah, yes, when he's driving, and when he's behind the wheel, everything is fine, therefore, here, as one of the already behavioral methods. well, try to finish your studies, and then you will have more control, more peace of mind. let's continue to think then, and in other areas of life. here is a request for control for such complete security is also present. i need to know exactly what time we will leave, where will we go? where are we going. this is what is important to work with. yes? once again, this is the idealization of this control of the requirement that everything be planned out, that it is impossible in another way, that, if we are late somewhere or we don’t do something from what is planned, then it’s just a misfortune that this nightmare with these convictions will work for the future

simply, yes, how to work with them is the same as with guilt. we take a certain belief, such as the state of sasha depends on me or i have to control everything and ask ourselves one simple question. and these beliefs correspond to reality or not. here is sasha , a man who never plans anything and always does everything spontaneously. something you planning to do something spontaneously so, yes. basically, probably, sasha just allows himself spontaneity with his usual planned routine. and you, probably, do not allow spontaneity to yourself , most often now i already allow it, because at the beginning it was not difficult, but now i have more or less let go of the situation. so here 's the same thing. plan first. you can use it again to plan for yourself a flash of this fear in the car on the one hand, because in the end, why are you so worried about it? because it's not planned they are scheduled, because you decided that that's all this time, i definitely didn't freak out talking about myself. that's it, i have such a plan

to freak out. and i would even bring children in a completely different way, for example. here you are on the red line. i take it quite often, well, you found no. yeah, well, sometimes you see, you know exactly where the belt starts to accelerate. yes, with you - this has already happened so many times, well, five times for sure, well, that is, you know that the sixth time and the seventh and eighth, that the same thing will happen, he will accelerate, then what will happen to him yes, chatting, and then so that it will slow down to stop and you will safely be where you wanted to be, what is now embarrassing the word safely. yes, but it doesn’t help me with these thoughts, this distraction is that everything is fine. we always go here, we always get there. mm. nothing happened. never even accidents that were planned and thoughts help. if this disorder is in its early stages. now it’s just important to understand what you have there, well , this feature of yours has conditionally progressed and you

will now become deeper, if these thoughts do not help, then, well, for sure what will help you. this is the absence of this very thing. that i’m so bad that i can’t cope with it all, you are already like that in the future is unknown. maybe you can, and i kind of set you up to work with this and you, and the likelihood that you can fix it, at least, or maybe remove it completely, or certainly transfer it to the stage of long-term remissions. this is directly possible, here, but once again in order to do this, you need resources, and you burn in dissatisfaction with yourself or in guilt before your husband, or there in fear that this will happen? i have a question from mikhail if anna will work on it. here is this overcontrol of other spheres of life. could this have a positive effect? you see this fear there, this fear is closely connected with such a deep value as the life of death.

there, this is involved and therefore, if we talk about the treatment of such cases, then at some stage of therapy , readiness for death is necessarily worked out, and with death in our life today yes, in today's prosperous society, people really do not like and afraid to face right there 50 years ago, for example, a woman could give birth to seven children, of which half simply did not live to adulthood. and it was the rule that people were ready for such an abundance of death. and now here is the abundance of our panic. these experiences of stress and so on. this is all due to the fact that we live very well. and we are not ready deep down for death, as a normal part of life about death - this is a normal part of life, and secondly, we are not even ready for pain. because pain is the result leads to death, and hence this

unpreparedness for pain, and then unpreparedness and even some discomfort leads to the fact that you are born a nation to give birth to children. if this discomfort has already been dug deep for him, he sometimes went in and stands deep. they are on top, so here is such a story of readiness for death, an important part of life. and here, tell let's talk about it. and what does it mean that the readiness for death is somehow ready, maybe sasha has such ideas? no, by the way, what is being said now is very called michael, i really think the sea is such a rule for all ages and for life, our civilization is still that's for sure. yes, i remember death very deeply, in fact. here, as we found out already, the roots have grown quite deeply on the accident so deeply. you can even give an example of another example there last year they rested at the sea, and there was such a storm there. this is when the waves were big, on which it’s cool for everyone to ride

, there are children and adults there, it’s cool there, there are small children, who was cool about these situations , it’s definitely important, then, you know exactly who was great. i was great, that's all. we talk about ourselves, yes, you don’t need to talk about everyone. okay, take me to the company, too, a notebook. well , i'm a boy there, well, not a little one there, but i know how to swim, chalk is always there and went for a swim. there, not far from the coast, he knows that you can’t drag me there, i didn’t drown, there, besides me, there are many more, of course, the assumption is an assumption. come on, and she is standing there on the shore, so next to the water next to her she is worried that they are calling me to the shore of safety. there sasha go over here. i say, come to me here waist-deep water through let's move away, where there are no waves up to the chest. you are healthy yes. doesn't say it's not scary. you deny her fear. yeah, fear

is not an external state. it's internal you 're talking about. no, it's not scary. you are not sick. you're all right, uh, let's go skiing. yes? no, no, let's go temperature. you may underestimate. you are actually doing this. it's just better to enter into the reality in which you live, while you deny that feature. and anya herself denies it. i'm straight, most likely in this sure. here, but you can’t do anything about it, that is, in other words, in that situation. she couldn't help but be afraid, yeah, but the psychologists who say that if you have some kind of phobia you need to go and face your fears and do just that. yes, these psychologists. i'm honestly ready. let's leave him to criticize, therefore, if

a person can meet his fears, dear colleagues, he will do it and without you. but if he came to you, this is already a fact that he cannot do this. mind where i am journalist natalya loseva and mikhail khors are looking for ways out of the most difficult situations today's request came from a husband who says that his wife is afraid of public transport. and the formula works. don't be afraid with you. here it works or not. we see that it does not seem to work. yes, the first flight, when we flew together on an airplane. she grabbed me, right there tightly clamped her hand very tightly , right there, i never felt such hugs there. you see, everything is profit and then it seems like how we went through it there, yes, let's say there is that you hold her hand, everything is there okay about that case in the airplane that he told. there, in the first situation, about

braking. she, with the role of that, she calmed herself in a different way, as she said, like that everything was normal there, she was more worried, and after the second there, the third visit, he had this flash. well, apparently a resource. there is a backlog for working with this another issue, it is important not to demand from yourself that it should go like this once and for all. that's it, if you've been collecting this in your head for years, give it years to work it out with bridge, jumped there and a relative there at the age of nine, well, in short, a small child drowning there, who was drowning, saved me from the water. well, by the way, i would have moved it there in a series of these cases. all the same, there was fear when they did not save. i would go there too. this is also this too. well, yes, i had nothing to do. how to decide. that's why you do it, firstly, it is also important to remember that you are solving these problems, just not as efficiently as you would like to anyway drive a car.

it's all the same there somehow, if you go on the train the situation is not so already started. i've worked with cases where people can't even get down the subway, and you can progress, she's progressing again, because there is criticism of this itself. this is a story, because instead of treating this situation, as you did, now is the first step . . yeah, to this healing, you were trying to devalue it a little bit, like. well, now we'll talk. we will now agree on everything, and everything will be lay-la, as it was, everything will be fine. no, it won't, yes, because, uh, the virus doesn't know the bacteria there. anything, here it is it is. yes, it is, it needs to be corrected already, but friends, what i see in this story is very interesting and vitally important. i see that you are a team. and what, anechka has a caring person nearby, perhaps sasha was wrong and did something

wrong, but sasha is interested. in any case, you are no longer alone. yes? you already have such a powerful partner, a friend who will be a support left to find a specialist. but it's unknown. by the way, i don’t mean, again , to offend someone, but this story, when you helped another girl in a traumatic situations. yes, she is very remarkable. maybe, on the contrary, sasha is superfluous, neuroticizing himself and they don’t ratify anya either . good specialists will say this. and maybe, really, don’t be surprised if he advises you, sasha is a page such and such a time from this problem, therefore, once again, yes , you ask how yes, well, that's about it, how to work. here with this first level there are books there is it. well, just a little bit, just approach this without fanaticism and let's ourselves work it out for ourselves by various specialists . hypnosis is not cpt hypnosis. uh, pick up the keys to this door, but to pick up the keys to it. you must first move the cabinet that

blocks this door and this cabinet is called. i am normal i have no problems or my wife is normal she has no problems. she's just stupid. here, as soon as this cabinet is moved to this keyhole. it is possible to select different keys. let me imagine for sure for this time and maybe maybe sash you uh accept this hypothesis. what about taking a step back and saying, huh? no, something like, i'm with you when i'm with you i need it, but please contact me, i'm more of your problem here, until i climb. if you need me, please tell me, yes, so that they do not feel loneliness and constantly here it is, uh, do not feel your tension. and maybe, an, how do you like this position, i don’t know, we have to try. yes here, i very much agree with this phrase that it is necessary to try better. yes , and see what happens and maybe, this is your tension will not. do not

fraternize anya. additionally, dear friends. important, at the end of each consultation psychological let down, some current. let's start with anna please tell me what was valuable, interesting and important for you . if it sounded, maybe you will say, i already knew all this. and in general, in fact, the most important thing that i noted for myself now is to try. even maybe. persuade out loud before each trip that i'm sorry, i'm going to scream nervous. yes cry class, yes, that is to try it. this option is a confession to pronounce not in oneself to keep what is so now, perhaps, there will be some situations. i will be nervous. we will try not to. and how to say something in jest. it is at the beginning to eat. maybe in jest. and maybe not a joke. yes, it is important to remember that what happens to you is not bad. just say it out loud, my outbursts, panics. there is bad for my outbreak and panic is bad. i'm not bad because of them, i'm not bad because of them. i

just got sick. i just got sick. how do you feel about this? mm, usually okay. here's a comfortable state yes, for a normal person, alexander, you took something important for yourself. i made sure that my wife is special so super. and what i probably need is some way to distance myself. so far i don't understand how to do it. uh, so that she herself may find ways to solve her problem, and in the case when this is necessary. i will come and help, yes, that is, you are also nearby, you all interact simply, and once again, we are less nervous. we then when they think that what is happening is a disaster, but because the trouble is such you know absolutely an assessment. it's all the end of the world. bad, trouble. horror these estimates are wrong. and we rely on reality when we compare events with each other, this is not as good as i would like, but it can be

worse, and when we remind ourselves of this that it can be worse in general. yes, it's better if we go there. but that's just the way it is now. here we have much more resources, because the nervous system is not tense , we have more resources to do something with the situation which is happening to us right now. uh-huh thank you and thank you, dear friends, for coming once again asking for help those who want to become stronger. you are great, friends. it was a podcast of the psyche, in which we traditionally searched for these same keys from the cabinets of drawers and chests of drawers, which our souls lie our problems. sometimes you just need to really move the furniture a little bit to see the secret exit doors . in any case, clinical psychologist mikhail khors, candidate of psychological sciences, believes in this and suggests the correct direction, what to move and what to look for friends all issues of projects podcast. you can

look at the website of the first channel one tv point ru history is sometimes something that never happened, described by someone who has never been there, one spanish playwright thought so. hello we gathered our thoughts today about history. whether it is a strict science or, as one historian said , a prophecy about the past, dear friends viktoria ivanovna ukolova, doctor of historical sciences, i cannot deny myself the pleasure of the last roman, as viktorovich calls guide? doctor of historical sciences, i am vladimir, a left candidate of political sciences, so i am very scared, firstly, whether you are

representatives of science or not, now we will find out. well, here we have political science. why do i want to start ucollingwood in his famous work, so to speak, the british historian has, uh, such an idea at the beginning that history is for human self-knowledge. here, in order not to go overboard, i’ll just read out the value of the story lies in the fact that thanks to it we find out what a person has done and thus what he is victoria she would like you to respond to this thought. you know, history, first of all, is needed by every human generation in order to find oneself in the flow of time and in the flow of e-universal life, because only by turning and opposing oneself to something that was before that one can self-identify, therefore history is this most important factor the existence

of mankind. that is almost like nature. how do you comment. well, actually, yes history. as a matter of fact, it is really about us, but about us in time, because about us in statics to understand, in general, nothing is impossible, well, about how to look at well, yes, scotty imagine the life of a person completely. it is very difficult. there, photography is always in general, deceptive, and in time, yes, and, especially with previous generations. and we can say a lot, and hmm actually. we specifically study ourselves in time in order to really say something about ourselves. well, let's talk about how we study ourselves, what is clear, that the topic is immense. i am very i would like us to touch on different aspects of all this, but since i formulated the topic, how is history a rigorous science? well , maybe a little so journalistic sharpened. that's when we talk about science with all the division of sciences there, let's allow for

the humanities. there are definitely natural or any other divisions. anyway , science is associated with a certain law with a form here, is there a legitimate history, how does this question answer great discussions around this issue, what is natural in for many? yes centuries i would say, uh, since the 19th century, especially, apparently , history has its own global laws of development, which can not always be es- sufficiently formulated. i would rather say that hmm the general orientation of certain periods in the historical events of certain events. for example, here are the colossal upheavals in those times when the world system is changing, the transition from the magnificent to the conditional. rome, by the middle ages , it took 300 years in continuous wars of continuous

chaos in order to structure a new system, then nearly a thousand years pass. well, a little less, if you count from 1,000 years, and when a new period begins , the renaissance reformation arises, all the huge period of the genius and the warrior, including the early modern time, and a new world is born, well, again, a new different attitude to history. so we got such regularities, as it seems to me, in such a turbulent period. well, here are the laws and patterns. it's not the same thing, but fyodor alexandrovich well, probably not the same thing, probably it is clear that the concept of regularity implies a certain mitigation. yes, so to speak, but here's the answer to this question. i, as such a standard historian, will always remember that how, in fact, this question was answered before me, yes, and here.

in general, we can immediately say that , by and large, when it came to the laws of history, it was, in general, an attempt to transfer some rules of the game, say, from the natural sciences, yes , to the science of man. therefore, i would still, probably, not talk about the laws of history, more precisely, i would not say so. in the ordinary sense , in the sense that out of many people they are trying to create a certain system. yes, so to speak, which is like, as if there are atoms in it, they are people , yes, to say, who really seem to play there according to certain rules , so to speak, they do not intrude, yes, naturally, science, but a person is free, and in this sense he is, uh, far away, not always predictable. and it may be, by the way, that he is free - this is a certain law of history. yes, here it is unpredictable fundamentally unpredictable. but i once talked on a similar topic with igor evgenievich surikov, and he said that the laws of history. maybe there is, but it's a big question. whether we

are able to know them, here is viktoria ivanovna, what do you think, therefore, i think that he was largely right, but he paid attention obviously. she is very tricky things that when we look. that is, we see the general course of history, we structure it, and in general we somehow learn, try to catch it. well, some the general course and the general direction of development, and we find them not only we establish them, but also from the natural course of life from the natural interaction of people and historical events. and here, to finish with this, so to speak, the general theoretical part of our dissertation. yes, do i understand correctly that if we look for some extreme points of view in those approaches that you said that there were many of them, yes, and discussions are underway that we

will have marx at one pole well, with rather tough ones yes but on the other. well, let's say heinrich rieker like this, who said that science is about culture. they have a relationship with individual and somehow valuable things, and not with laws and laws like science. in nature these are such extreme yes points of view, as far as i understand in the assessment, and i'm just wondering, here, you personally tend to which field more on this spectrum, so to speak. i think marx yes is a very good example indeed. yes, that is , this is an attempt to create a theory of everything in the humanitarian sphere, yes, some kind of formula, so to speak, a total formula. yes, that's the one even in the natural sciences itself, it is impossible to create. yes, but on the other side. eh, maybe not rickert, just uh , this is the idea that not a person exists in certain circumstances.

they determine, and say, but on the contrary, that a person, in fact, ultimately determines those processes, yes, that is , let's say so on the other side at the other pole, maybe there will be a micro history, maybe there will be a history of a person of a specific person of specific people . but klyuchevsky, by the way, argued. yes, as far as i understand, with the fact that history is concerned with a specific person, or am i confusing something, e, of course, he argued, but in fact, here is his era as a whole , my scientific great-great-grandfather klyuchevsky argued, yes, naturally existed in certain circumstances . naturally yes. and, but e, nevertheless, nevertheless, to a large extent determined them, that is, here he is, so to speak, e not without such populist influence, yes, not without a populist approach. yes, he said that a is the people in the first place, and only then the person veteran. remember, we are like you, but we talked, and now i can sort it out, of course. correct me, but you said that if you look for some laws, then these are just

the turning points in the clash of different cultures. yes, i'm trying to convey in my own words. and usually you or not rarely. yes wins so, which is considered, well, less that's how it actually was. the roman empire , i'm probably not very sure not. i understand what you are talking about, but i also wanted to no, it 's just what ordinary turns of speech you know, you usually get the impression that when if a person is free, then he acts as he wants. and in general, the whole history consists of these fragmentary actions of fragmentary events, fragmentary events. e even the processes are so short, but just like a mosaic folds into a single whole. for example, everyone was hagia sophia, you see a golden

glow, and you don't think that it was made up of a mass of pieces of smythe and just the same in history. why, for example, the definition of the crusades or the century? wars or and so on other events. they are given later they are given after uh, hundreds of years after they uh happened because the participants had no idea. they even evaluated what was happening differently, but already through the centuries it was clear that the integrity of these events, the direction of these transmission processes, is dedicated to what the prophecy is. now, i would like to say that there is a difference between prophecy and the prediction of the prophets. after all, they already see, and for them the word is clearly connected with the highest pure being. they don't just know, they see, because it already

exists in this being, as we know. momentary, and so they reveal historians looking for it looking for in the sources. he does not begin to philosophize the one who from some general provisions, he will hardly reach the essence of things, but still he has some assumptions, and he goes into these sources in the same way. they already exist events have already taken place, but the historian does not yet know what he will find there, but he knows for sure what is in this soil and sources. he can only find it there. e your footing, but if he stops there and doesn't make any generalizations for myself. i'm not talking global then the historical work of historical research will not turn out to be sullen. from

monday on the first today we gathered our thoughts about whether history is a strict science or a prophecy about the past victoria ivanovna ukolova fedor aleksandrovich gaida? i am vladimir league. yes, we continue from the beginning. this is where the significance of historical distance lies. and what it should be, i understand that it depends on the scale of the event, but still, what is the minimum after which we can, relatively speaking, cross called the crusades. it is impossible to define it, in general, yes to say, because, and i communicate everything in general, so to speak. our human history. it basically didn't end, and uh, eventually we'll have to say, yes, that's it, when it's over, then we'll put everything in its place. yes, he is a historian. it is natural to tell him, in fact , it is quite convenient to judge from a certain distance, maybe it would be better if it

was more, but it is desirable that the sources be preserved. yes, it will be difficult. here, but he e very often. before that, a certain retrospective trap like this. yes, because he turns out to be, how to say, e smarter than his heroes. yes, this is actually a very deceptive situation, so to speak, because, and he is never smarter, in fact, yes, he needs to be fine. it's easy to know the consequences. he just knows the consequences. he is here very often. eh, it’s as if he’s tempted to tell why it should have happened exactly the way it happened, yes, then they tell him the truth, well, if you drew it this very line is wonderful. spend it a year ahead, and that's it. and here and there space begins. yes, because actually this one. uh, in general, there is no straight line, we are dealing with people. this is fundamentally important to know, yes and a. all of our generalizing models here are still a generalizing

model, that is, in other words. yes, here are the figures of the crusades, they went to the crusades not because feudalism had come. yes, this is how we will explain this, i believe that i did not have a feudal lord at all. well, let's say yes they are no moreover, they are they after all, er, the crusades were set off not because feudalism had come and not because feudalism had not come. this is not a conversation about this at all, but to say this is ours, generalizing just schemes about which we can, by the way, have endless discussions. is it actually normal and correct that the renaissance has the status of an independent historical era, or is it two eras three or five. yes, and a half, yes, but be that as it may, it’s still, really. all the same, we must, yes , say, approach these people very gently, so to speak, politely try to understand them, in fact, as soon as such a conditional dialogue and history is built with not even just a source, but

a historian with these people. that's when we actually start something. but look, comrade scientists, here is my question. most likely, i hope that i will be able to formulate it. so you said, yes, there is this risk, uh, that someone might think that you know more and there is more, as far as i understand, the standard error. hmm, a bad historian who evaluates the past with today's positions. yes, using some categories, uh, today's and so on, but in general, in a sense, he cannot evaluate otherwise. yes, of course, we will allow, when we say, relatively speaking, the city of the state of the policy is the city-states. this attempt at a definition can be accepted if we immediately make a reservation that it wasn’t a city for me in the modern sense, it wasn’t there, and so on, but somewhere there is a border that cannot be crossed using this already existing knowledge. we are not we can remove them. yes, in assessing the past, especially the past distant in history. there is one very important function of predictive

humanity always needs support. well, the main support is, of course, religion. it's clear what it does. humanity is humanity in many ways, but history also shows this in our time. i've been watching lately. while research is being split up. rome into fragments it is considered intolerant to consider the crisis of the third century in rome as a crisis, that is , our values ​​are attached and at the same time, i i look at political scientists, especially american rome as an ideal. hmm, of course, not historical. but here it is very important that it is not historical rome that turns out to be defining milestones on a huge piece of history, that is, the first rome as the first form of globalization, let's say now it is so defined, which is the first boiler house, this is not entirely accurate, because at the same time it goes to china is the same process

that in the third century bc during the punic wars, when there was a pattern of struggle. to the leading civilizations hmm over the hmm world mediterranean dominance. yes, uh, here i’ll grab onto this expression of a historical analogy, how much they help us understand something, but today. and here i was listening to lectures. e about the peloponnesian war and thought how it all helps modern or here there is more risk or help address, which means, what do you think, well, it's still an explanatory model. yes, so to speak, one cannot go too far with them, that is, one cannot exist without them, but they, uh, cannot be absolutized. that is, in the end. just a story. really gotta understand here is the delicacy of his position. yes, in a sense, he is an intermediary between the people of the past, with whom he builds

a certain dialogue and his readers, the people of the present. that is, he, in fact, should by and large, yes, in the language of the present. to tell modern people and they must understand, yes, so to speak, about a-a people or events there, of course, first of all it is about people, because, so, in people of the past. yes and here, respectively, yes , so to speak, he should not modernize too much, but at the same time, if he will start, let’s say tell, in the way that people of the past said, no one will understand, of course, here he performs this, so to speak, the function of an intermediary, which means that with models it ’s about the same. but tell me, then ogurevich, in my opinion, said that when you talk with a person from the past, you need to hear his answers e do not impose your own on him yes, but here, as here, so to speak e creativity in science. here we once talked to you. hmm. in my opinion, extremely.