the last match left. it's okay, tomorrow we'll be at volya tomorrow everything will be fine. today it will be easy, how about me? di ibraghimogli your horse there mountains who named this taiga wolves?

there is a big game on the air, we talk a lot about the fact that the united states is not just a leading nato country, but in general it is , if you want not a sovereign european union , it is at least a hegemon country and the conflict over ukraine only made the united states and more more influential in european. continent, but sometimes it seems to me that europeans, at least, many european leaders, that they are called what they need, do not need to be spurred on. and that they themselves are full of enthusiasm

in the matter of confrontation with russia and today we, uh, managed to agree on the deputies of the minister of foreign affairs alexander viktorovich grushko and alexandrovich has a very busy schedule and are extremely grateful that you found the time? of course, i want to start with the obvious question to europe: what is europe doing now regarding the ukrainian crisis, do you see any new trends. and most importantly, do you see any disappointment in europe about the failure of the ukrainian counter-offensive is a disappointment that could have real political consequences. hello dimitri well, first of all. i would like to say that it is hardly worth expecting any changes. ah, in the western course in relation to ukraine, and here it is.

as a matter of fact, not only in what happens on the battlefields, which will be of key importance, including for the position ultimately taken by our western european e . by for ukraine, it is directly woven into the strategy of the european union washington and nato to contain russia. ah, we know that today western countries are waging a hybrid war against the russian federation. it is carried out in various forms. this is an ideological war, a propaganda war , the demonization of russia, the attribution of all kinds of malicious intentions to it, and this is an economic

war, which is expressed in an unprecedented number of sanctions that have been introduced illegally. against our country. it's military pressure which is carried out through a very aggressive military construction, first of all through the nato structure and finally, but using an instrument called the conflict in ukraine and until then. for now, this tool will serve the purposes of containing russia, and western countries, including, as it were rightly noted. the eu countries will use this tool, but this tool is consumable, and consumables, as we know, run out sooner or later. and if the west intends to use this tool before the last ukrainian, then we leave it on their conscience in any case for today, but

expect some changes. and in general this course. eh, the west is not necessary. well, you are right that there are certain nuances, and recently we, uh, observed what thoughts are expressed by the leaders of hungary who directly say that the war in ukraine can be stopped at any moment, for this it is necessary to stop the provision of military financial and other support, because in an independent form. and ukraine today this reality cannot exist , this is a reality that no one can change, but the truth is that the west could stop that sad development of events in ukraine at any moment. he could stop him when poroshenko announced a punitive operation against his own people, what had to be done for this had to

be carried out immediately. at least part of the sanctions to state that the association agreement is being frozen, that kiev will not see anything without a visa, that products produced in ukraine will not be delivered to western european markets. and i think that at that time, uh, the west had all the tools to nip this story in the bud, but since once again, returning to my first thought, the task was, but to somehow substantiate this absolute one. a smart containment strategy for russia that is necessary in order to justify the existence of alliance a through the alliance to seek to maintain the hegemony of the west in the world. ukraine has become a victim. here are these where, uh, foreign policy, uh, geopolitical plans, and you mentioned, uh, the hungarian prime minister orbán. he is uh, very uh

specific and i would say colorfully about the danger of an escalation in ukraine with very serious consequences for european security. let's hear what he just said to the american tv commentary like this. the opinion exists that ukraine is winning this war, this does not seem to be true. it's a lie. this is not just a misunderstanding. it's a lie. this is impossible. everyone who is involved in politics understands the logic of figures and data knows that this is impossible. this is a tragedy for ukraine, they will run out of soldiers earlier than russia, which in the end will matter. so these are boots on the ground, and the russians are much stronger in number and more numerous at some point they will need more people more soldiers, where ukraine will take them. this is the most dangerous question. if any western side send their troops. this will mean a direct war between the west and russia

and we will immediately find ourselves in a third world war. this is a very dangerous moment. this is a very dangerous moment and the organ has spoken about it before, but i repeat it says fearless and very colorful. but what do you think? uh, what is it about the body personally or more broadly hungary that allows them to inspire them to take this position, no one else, as far as i know in the european union, is going that far yet. i hmm would agree with that, but it's really a very sober analysis of the situation. i would say he is so surgical and he is trying to viktor orban and the hungarian leader, but to attribute some pro-russian sympathies. actually today. it's a sad fact, hungary the only country

that is not afraid to speak openly publicly into the microphone, but its own national interest, as it sees them and a with this, but the works do not agree, because a history of russian hungarian relations. it is not quite simple, but it is quite obvious that in many respects the well-being of hungary, even countries that are a member of the european union and nato, it largely depends on healthy normal ties with the russian federation. i want to say that this position of hungary is a reasonable position, weighted based on awareness of their own national interests, which are associated in the understanding of hungarian politicians with european interests. it is also expressed in the position they take on the issues of sanctions, and hungary has directly

stated that it is interested in russian gas in oil. it does not allow for sanctions. there are also certain sectors of the economy where the position of hungary plays a very balanced role. and of course, if there were more such politicians, and with such a balanced approach, there could be more the situation would be, uh, different, but today we must proceed from the reality. you were talking about escalation. a indeed, the situation is developing according to a dangerous scenario, let me remind you that at first. uh, they said that aid to ukraine would be purely non-lethal. germany announced that it would be limited to bulletproof vests and helmets , today it came to the supply of tanks, and other equipment. uh, they say, uh keeps talking about deliveries of f-16s, but more

long-range uh, and more deadly. uh, missiles and so on and so forth and even now, when we are talking to you in the city of toledo, the minister of defense is sitting. uh, eu countries together with foreign ministers and among other things. they will discuss the idea of ​​establishing a special fund, and for the supply of arms to ukraine for the period from 24 to 27. that is, this is it, hostile planning in their a-a strategic vision , it will develop, according to current flights from the other side. i am absolutely convinced that uh our response is very firm and very effective to all attempts to escalate uh, the military situation in the theater of operations, and it impresses western

planners. and i think they understand a lot of the risks of a direct confrontation. with russia , here is the kdv. talk about military planners. and it's hard for me to disagree with you. and there is, uh, a lot of evidence, both private and public , that what you said is absolutely true. but when we talk about the top political leadership of nato countries, including the united states. here i am less sure, and i am sure. you know there are so many there are a lot of materials from the western press, which, in general, the leaders of the west have come to the conclusion. and what about the russian warnings and the russian firm position , about which you just spoke, that you can allow this to be ignored, and in general not to be considered

painlessly enough, what is russia doing to dispel this kind of illusion? i have already said about this, what russia is doing and what our military is doing on the battlefield before demonstrating our capabilities to respond to any escalation of counter-escalations in the form as we see fit, and i have spoken about this more than once. uh, our president, let me remind you of his famous statement that we did not start and we have today. this, according to many western military officials, there is sufficient potential that will neutralize all attempts by the united west to force e to succeed, to help, more precisely, e-e ukraine to succeed, and in the so-called counter -offensive, which to date has led to zero, and results with point of view, that is, the strategy that is chosen by e

nato to inflict a strategic defeat on russia they also lead to the fact that everything. expensive weapons are successfully burning on the battlefields. i would like to answer one more moment, uh, in any case, apparently, we must proceed from the fact that changes in the western position - this may seem to be the prospects for a transition, and transferring the conflict to the phase of some kind of negotiated solution. e, will be related to how they will assess the overall e, the balance of e, the benefits of the e benefits that are associated with the continuation of this adventurous policy in the ukrainian direction, and not let's forget about the afghan history. we remember how the us and nato entered there with what determination, and with what words, what slogans

framed this political decision together we came out together to stabilize, huh? we spent 12 years there. uh, the total number of contingents in some periods reached almost 400,000 people, and let me remind you that nato contingents formed the backbone of the international security assistance force, but 12 years have passed. and when they speculated what they had achieved there, and that they had lost huge resources , they were thrown away. just into the wind. we have become witnesses of the shameful shameful flight of the americans and the brace and in fact. eh, that's enough. uh, a scenario that applies uh to ukraine a. i remember very well the uh discussions we had, uh, with representatives of the nato countries when they made this strategic decision to withdraw

. the fact is that the international security assistance force was established by resolutions of the security council and nato had to be accountable. before the security council on the solution of the tasks that were formulated in the relevant resolution. they talked about that all war is not popular with society. she doesn't need resources spent. in vain elections in one country choosing in another. basically, we're leaving. a and a is a given, which should, but simply be considered. and when i said, what will happen to afghanistan, they said, what if the afghans do not want to live in peace among themselves? and is it necessary here? here is a cynical approach that shows all the principles of western approaches in relation to this or that situation, but uh, once again i would like to note that the fiasco in afghanistan eh? showed that nato

organization of security. it does not fit into the modern multipolar reality, ah. it is completely unadapted to the security conditions that developed in the post-cold war period, and in fact, the afghan history of the afghan fiasco in many respects, but prompted nato to move to the side, and its original purpose was to repel the threat. from the east. this is how the history of the demonization of russia and the actual conflict in ukraine began, which were also created and by the hands of the west it was used for the ideological justification of this return of the alliance to the schemes of the cold war, and today we are witnessing the most dangerous e for european security. by the way, the consequences of such a transition to these outdated

schemes, which should have already remained in the graveyard of history, but today i would like to emphasize once again nato is heading for a military clash with russia and the strengthening of the eastern flank continues, new commands are being created. uh, recreated two old commands one wolmy, the other in norfolk, which is intended for to ensure the rapid transfer of american and other troops to the wedge of contact, and the deployment of forces on the territory of the countries of the eastern flag is increasing to the brigade level. this is, first of all, poland, the baltic states, romania, bulgaria, it is recognized that advanced warehouses are placed there, weapons that can be used for military operations , and so on and so forth

. today day the sum of nato's military budgets is uh, the space ones are just hmm and the number is already more than a trillion 100 billion more than half, and the world's spending on defense, more precisely on ensuring military security and the inertia that is given by these, and its decisions will be it is very difficult to overcome, and in the final analysis, i will emphasize once again, and much will depend on europeans. first of all, sooner or later they must realize their national interests. if quite recently, nevertheless, the prevailing understanding was that european security, a?

it’s impossible to build without russia, today the majority says that there will be no security either against russia or without russia, and now we remember one of the main ideologists of such a vision today, uh, the world through the eyes of europeans, and josep barel, who uh , consider the european union as a blooming garden, and the rest of the world. how the coals are absolutely a dead end road , this whole structure will collapse sooner or later. it will collapse in ukraine, and thanks to the resilience of the armed forces of the russian federation, it will collapse in the world, because the multipolar world has already taken place once again i would like to note that when we talk about ukraine and when we talk about whether the position of the western countries regarding ukraine can change, is this part of one big bastard of one big one? a puzzle that is much more complex than

what is happening in the ukrainian theater, but here is one piece of the puzzle that is not yet complete. it's clear. this is the statement of the french minister of foreign affairs, catherine of the column, that france is considering the possibility of becoming the first country that will give security guarantees to ukraine, i repeat. she says, that this is only being considered so far is not a fact, but i should not tell you that the provision of such a guarantee to ukraine by a country like france could definitely measure less and increase it, but if you want, impudence, i’m not afraid to say the impudence of the kiev leadership. and this, of course, would also be a serious moment of escalation. e, reported e or russia ministry of foreign affairs. the fate of france is that, considering the possibility of a guarantee,

this is a very serious matter and can have very unpleasant consequences for france itself the fact is that in general, as if france has withdrawn itself, and from the european political front, if when we talk about france it is very difficult not to remember, but the french presidents, who, after all, each in their own way, but in their activities, were guided by the interests of greatness france , i now use exactly the terminology that is typical for the french and french leaders who historically played a leading role in trying to build european security in such a way that it would be comfortable for everyone.

ah, it was france, uh, and de gaulle played an outstanding role in bringing to light such concepts as europe as a safe europe from the atlantic to the urals a and many, many other things and the steps that they took, a i let me remind you that it was charles de gaulle who made the decision to withdraw france from the military organization. and nato is. uh, charles de gaulle said that france would not participate in wars where she had no interest and would not be involved in any conflicts through membership. allowed, nevertheless, in the field of european security to start, and systematic work on e, schemes that would be based on.

the bloc nature of european security is not about its division, not on a balance, but on the balance of potentials and counter-potentials, threats and contour, on the search for such a threat, but on such formulas that would ensure the security of all on the basis of the principle of indivisibility of security, no one strengthens the security of others and in in this respect what we see today in the french position. it's completely different. this is following the general. uh, the european union installations are even more so in some matters. uh, france is about the same, and positions as pre-front, and poland and the baltic countries, and uh, uh, the principles of holism, which have always distinguished france, at least in its european politics. what is missing today in practical implementation? as for the security guarantee?

well, to be honest, uh, it's hard to say about any security guarantees , there has been a lot of talk about israeli guarantees. uh, which is expressed primarily in arms supplies. but this is exactly what france is already doing today. and by the way, if we look at the volume of assistance provided by france on the one hand. they are not champions. they are not in the first five, probably, those who single out. uh, money for the maintenance of the apu, but nevertheless, they supply fairly modern powerful weapons. these are caesar's roman systems, these are wheeled tanks, amx tanks are a scalp rocket and other things. this is already some kind of guarantees and security. and so i would not do it today.

to say that we have a very clear idea of ​​what kind of security guarantees will be u m could be provided by france as uh, the foreign minister of this country says, the hybrid war against russia that the west unleashed is quite obvious, and i am sure that the french should also understand. and what does this involve with increasing risks for the security of france itself? i would very much like to ask you to ask your short reaction to uh, french and more broadly eu stance on nigeria's coup d'état about which they talk as if they are still colonial powers and are responsible for what is happening in their colonies well you are absolutely right. actually in

this question there are your answers. i completely agree with that. unfortunately, it's not just about relationships. e of western countries to the events that are taking place in africa this also applies to events in many other parts europe, in fact. we see that in western capitals they look at these events not from the point of view of internal factors and the internal evolution that these societies are going through these states, and not through the prism of the difficulties that this state has to overcome. including due to the fact that they were not the object of colonial policy. e, many western states, and above all , they look from the point of view of e geopolitical confrontation. with russia from china, that's all, and we see that 90% of the positions of western countries in

in relation to certain events is determined precisely by this zero-sum zero- sum game, as we call it. and how will it strengthen the position of russia or will it not strengthen the position - this is russia, again , this is a dead end road, uh, which will and contradicts such a position contradicts itself, and those states which they would like to play a role on the continent, because it shows that these continents, these regions are considered as the arena of some kind of geopolitical opposition , confrontation and war proxy. uh, with uh russia no trust can arise with china and the russian federation. as you know, africa russia has shown this to itself . africa russia offers a fundamentally different scheme of mutual

which is based on mutual respect on mutually beneficial cooperation on non-interference in internal affairs and on the readiness to provide assistance in all areas in which these countries themselves need without any pressure from outside. this is precisely such a policy that should lie at the basis of normal interstate relations in a multipolar world. what is the west doing? this is done with exactly the opposite sign. thank you very much for the information, for the analysis , for taking the time to talk to us. of course, what you wrote is not a very optimistic situation, as they say, it is the way it is. and of course, it's important to really understand it. and thank you for your very important help in this regard. thank you and hope again. see you on our air

thank you first of all, the one who is ready to protect his home his homeland his loved ones his children his woman. we have everything, as under control. in case of which we are always ready to run defense here and accept a holy battle. honestly, tell me, do you regret that you are a russian person, and i grabbed it, then they ran to dig them out. yes, of course, i'm better than the fees of the people of the people's love, the viewer pays me with his love. and this is happiness when you approach a child, and he immediately tells you, look, but i don’t have an arm, and i don’t have a leg. and you, as

an adult, at some point, you hang, the truth is on our side. i am convinced that we cannot be defeated. here in this we must believe, it is natural to believe in the victory of the premiere special reportage of the star on the front line on sunday on the first in the tape now we would appear profitably. download the sbp app, pay with one touch and get 3% cashback in the feed, a friend of mine has a difficult relationship with the internet. cool hit, i'll launch it now. damn, wrong file how to undo? artyom is no longer the same as

megafon, everything flies with him. switch to megafon , the number one mobile operator in terms of speed and coverage. cool videos spread faster than i thought, because with 5g with him faster birthday sokolov , the number one jewelry brand in russia, announces a festival of holiday discounts of more than 15,000 original jewelry and watches, essentially the prices of the wildberries magnet. candy mask 39.99 price, what you need tinkoff platinum enough money for holidays and repairs tinkoff platinum best credit card you will have time to issue before august 31 and get free service forever. tinko. he is such a fun one. well now i have them five five times more fun from the movie lost new items. watch the content of five online cinemas in

one subscription with discounts, for example, a pencil case. megamarket perpetual motion machine of profit remember what you were told when you decided to open a business. yes, you're a girl, it's not women's business, but you didn't listen. because you're doing everything wrong. continue alpha-bank was the first in russia to abolish the ikvaria commission. all payments. no commission with a free account for business , alpha-bank is the best bank for business, one of my friends is very picky about the roles. actress on the set, i will not act in this, you will be left without money. don't worry, the rabbit will

drink with money and with a new smartphone mega profitable with a mega-subscription smartphone plus connection paid once a month. and get the third gift from dolce & milka in l'etoile, not only cashback in legendary restaurants by premium class taxis, but also access to business lounges with a premium world supreme yandex.market card merci 269.90 you can't want that much. you can, try it, a maximum of only 399 rubles. 50 gigs

2.000 minutes and unlimited apps. can iota. why choose between a car, a vacation, furniture repair, when you can take a loan from a post office bank to buy everything with a service and a guaranteed rate of such a loan, enough for everything, come in for money, the post office bank is 55 years old, the heart speedometer showed the limit of 200, but semenovich said, do not go under hood woman, guys don't slow down. go through medical examination, health is important here and now. i decided to find out what companies we have in the country. what they do, what they produce where they want to achieve and what they want to achieve, the goal is to create the best

avatars in the world will not work. we make unique cars. this is the world lasers in russia we are the only ones. all stages, from development to production of the finished product , are made in our country. the quality of our products is not inferior, but in many ways superior to foreign counterparts, but at an affordable price, our projects are very important. it is also an opportunity to take a step towards some future. while i want to do something for russia so that here, at least, everything is better and better, our big premiere is coming soon on the first in ukraine, stubborn

battles continue, mostly positional, but what ukraine fails to do. uh, where it matters most on the battlefield, the ukrainians are trying to compensate for some kind of attacks on their drones with attacks that are mostly ineffective attacks, which basically, as the new york times writes, are not able to affect the military in any way. situation. and obviously someone in kyiv has a desire. but if you want to show us all that, uh, they are ready for any escalation. just to prove to their curator washington and their own citizens that they still have some kind of opportunity. let us tell you dmitry drozdenko, a well-known military expert , and you are the editor-in-chief of the online magazine

arsenal of the fatherland, a very authoritative and serious magazine. how do you assess the situation at the front, and especially, of course, in the direction of the main ukrainian attack, but in the zaporozhye direction. well, the situation is zaporozhye direction. eh, pretty heavy. and especially powerful battles are going on in the area work, that is, the line work on the willow. now our defense line is under attack, and the ukrainian pulled there, in principle, quite large forces, according to separate calculations. this is up to 40,000 military personnel. these are all of them can be said to be foreign-trained brigades, including those along the bottom built to standards. this brigade is a striker, but the enemy’s relative excess in terms of forces and means is about 40 percent, which , in principle, is, as it were, normal for defense on our troops, it must be said that it’s hard, but so far the defense line itself is like

such, that is, given that the enemy took? in fact, work, but this line, going along the heights along the ridge, there, of course, is not a very large excess. uh, maybe there are a couple of tens of meters, but so far , according to the latest data, they have not broken through. uh, everything says that for the first time, not only according to the latest data in moscow, but also the latest data, as i understand it, the committees of the heads of that washington. absolutely right. that's it, there are uh battles going on, but the global promotion of u is not visible, because the main goal is so magician, uh and great. the main goal is to cut the land corridor. there is a logistics hub and on it. basically, much more efficient. uh, you can move exactly uh, towards the coast. e seas, and thus, as i said , cut. uh, land corridor, so this direction is very important. and we

understand this, and therefore e once we retreated from kherson, once we built a powerful line of defense. just getting ready for these events. and there are two lines of defense. between work tokmok. there are actually more of them, that is, uh, there is not only a line of defense that follows the front line, but there are also uh, the so-called transverse line of defense, which are designed to prevent the enemy from enveloping. well, a breakthrough and coverage, for example. parts of our group, that is, understand here, not only minefields, and not only dragon's teeth there. this is all, as it were , we overcome, an obstacle to be overcome, that they are lines of defense - this is a whole complex of engineering structures, uh, measures that, uh, actually exhaust the enemy don't let him get ahead. in principle, what we are seeing now, because the opponents are losing colossal resources, both human and material, and let 's hope that after some time he

will run out of steam, especially since they have, as it were, shell hunger, like would have passed a little and, uh, with the help of the west. naturally, with the help of the west , because it e produces such a number of shells. e cannot even, in principle, the entire nato bloc taken together, but again, it cannot yet. as for the drones. i wanted to add. i have repeatedly said that this is a new trend. uh, in military affairs , the americans are now very carefully working through all this, taking into account changing their doctrine, in principle, quite seriously. so here the question is purely the production of the production of cheap countries. and, of course, i generally think that this is pandora's box and that the west allowed it to be pulled out. well, roughly speaking, that's outside , nobody knows where other drones from other countries will fly. uh, the same britain or the usa has its enemies, and the handicraft production of these systems is built on civilian components allows you to do this

practically in the garage, and cope with it. even such an advanced, most advanced air defense system in the world, like ours, is difficult. if you are talking about an aircraft, then, in general, as a rule, you know where it took off from. and with drones, this is sometimes difficult for ukrainians to ascertain. uh, they seem to be even flirting zelensky’s adviser podolak makes it clear that the drones are theirs, but he won’t say directly and zelensky sins with this. well, in general, but about ukraine and russia, there are neighbors who actively support ukraine, and so i'm trying understand they are so overreacting to a non-existent threat. she, for example, that belarus will invade poland, this is what they pose as a threat. yes, it doesn't

occur to them. and that, in general, it is not known from where some drones that they. eh, they'll also cause noticeable harm. and, of course, russia is not going to talk about anything like this to me now and is definitely not doing anything of the kind. but those who escalate. it is useful for them to think about the possible consequences, and sometimes the consequences are not the most obvious. i was just talking with alexandra viktorovich grushko, deputy minister of foreign affairs, and we discussed the reasoning in paris a. shouldn't we give security guarantees, but to ukraine, and, uh, i immediately thought that now, if france goes for it. of course, the historical ones don’t think about them, and they don’t understand that this step would be, but would lead to

further hostility between moscow and paris and, uh, you never know what it will result in. i can give you one example dmitry when there was an uprising in poland in 1863 i'm laughing because, uh, it was a funny situation. although tragic , alexander ii began to carry out large-scale reforms in response to these large-scale reforms in poland, of course, they decided that he was a weakling and that they could take advantage of this situation, well, for the pole. it ended tragically, and france tried to actively support poland and , er, even sent some threat warnings to moscow. and on alexander ii e in several

marys, his ministers speak about it. this made a very bad impression. but he was not looking at that moment for a new military conflict with france, it would be just a few years after the crimean war. at that moment he did nothing. but then 7 years later, when there was a conflict between prussia and france and when france turned to russia with a request for help, there was an answer from st. petersburg. and what can we do for you, but in fact it was meant, and why should we do something for you? it seems to me that this is a very dangerous game. i want to ask you, general reshetnikov, are you a lieutenant general. you were, and not just one of the top officers of the foreign intelligence service. well, they saw

the information and analytical direction there, and i want to ask you. eh, about your analysis, the analysis of this situation with the endless supply of weapons to ukraine is right. the united states allocates new 250 million dollars, mainly just for weapons, for artillery and basically, by the way, even for ammunition in france they are talking about some new guarantees for ukraine e. in germany, in my opinion, they simply no longer know what they can give to their beloved ukraine. a do you see any signs that when opinion polls in europe and local elections show that ukraine is losing popularity, and that politicians who are against supporting kiev are winning, do you see any signs that the big european states are starting to think about the possible reconsider your position. well

, maybe they analyze and in a narrow circle, uh, discuss these issues, but in my opinion. while ukraine is demonstrating the ability to conduct active actions, which dmitry just spoke about, while they are demonstrating. like this perseverance and willingness to sacrifice tens of thousands. just recently yesterday. uh, they let it slip and called 400,000 deadweight losses. while ukraine a. not ukraine, but zelensky, his entourage - this is demonstrated. i think and they are not ready to change their position. they will continue to do so. i would like to pay attention to what they say that they have opened the second front. these sabotage drones are shelling our territory. here indeed. eh, i agree with you a little. er, well, not such a significant military effect, but they do. this it

for the sake of, first of all, from a moral and psychological point of view, they do not hide and do not hide this for themselves, and, as it were, for us, this is the western position. she is known to bring confusion, uh, to the russian elite of the russian population. it will end up dissatisfied. it will eventually call. eh, the government to such and such measures. there is hope for some people here who will talk about this sleeping fifth deck, so we also need to take this seriously, not only from a military point of view. eh, once the enemy. the enemy is not only the kiev regime, and the enemy of nato - this is obvious, and we were listening to the deputy minister together with you. first time for a second. i know you choose your expression very carefully, and part of your job in the past has been to give, uh, an assessment of a situation with enough nuance. this is what they said that

you didn’t say that you need a cartridge, you didn’t say that you need to support nato. well consider that nato is an adversary, real participants certainly. these are the actions with drones that they carry out with mass drones absolutely. i'm absolutely sure. i think experts will support exclusively nato intelligence. well, kiev is not capable. with all the desire to ensure these flights, these actions , these objects, and so on, exclusively. is this nato information? we noticed that, before each such massive action of drones or sea or air, several us reconnaissance aircraft well, how to say, they don’t barrage correctly, but ply along the borders of practically russia, why to collect the latest data on the transfer of

ukraine if this so dmitry you transfer data in direct mode, and during a military operation, do you agree with the general that this rises to the level of not supporting, but direct participation in hostilities. well, you know, that's the question. uh, not at all military. and how much political, that is, a special operation or a war or something else is going on, the west has never hidden and moreover stated that they transmit in real time all the entire array of data, but for use at the front. uh, our defense minister sergei has already spoken to shoigu many times. what a huge number of satellites hangs over the battlefield, civilian military satellites hang, that is, the entire infrastructural satellite is involved, where ukraine has satellites. she, of course, can be a great space power. but this is when she was part of the great, that is, the country. here , uh, so a huge array is coming. it's not just planes that these drones. uh,

flying competently flew in, you need not just to know the terrain. we need to open our system by radar fields. that is, it is all a very complex complex, and the complex measures of electronic intelligence, which carries out the west and the same e, mi6 or the pentagon draw these routes. that is , all this is being worked out and the goals are highlighted. you must not just hit, you need to understand when to hit, how to make sure that uh, this uh, the beetle could fly by. in principle, we do the same, but the comparison is again with the e, draw and e strategic e aircraft, which the americans constantly hang. in fact , from four to six aircraft hang almost continuously along the border of the black sea and along the border of the limiting countries, but uh russia has a lot of other things right, and russia has cruise missiles. uh, russia has daggers. er, about russia, there are , er, a lot of means that are already being used to

strike at ukraine, er, so i don't have the impression that russia is in this fight. well, if you like, not only the losers of the country, but also the weakness of the country, but of course, uh, one point that uh explains what is happening is that uh , citizens of western countries, including the united states, do not understand what they are doing, uh, leaders . and now, let's listen andranik migrannyan is a professor at mgimo, let 's hear what they write about this. uh, the magazine is not a sound the american press enthusiastically supports ukraine however, they do not dare to question the activities of the american intelligence agencies, which they should closely monitor, among other things, we deny any connection between the expansion and the beginning of the ukrainian conflict downplay the role of neo-nazism in the ranks

of the ukrainian military and, among other things , spread dubious allegations that russia destroyed the pipeline nord stream and congress are just starting to ask questions about what is really happening, but there were no such serious hearings on ukraine, including the house of representatives, which is now controlled by the republicans. why this is happening in the american media and the expert community, i don’t know such a conspiracy of silence or political correctness, what is happening, but this is just understandable. the fact is that more than 90% of the american media is a liberal mixture, which is actually controlled by e. democratic party. we remember very well what happened to twitter. elon the brain, just revealed this mechanism,

when, in fact, the national democracy committee of the democratic party of the national national committee of the democratic party actually gave instructions. what message to post on twitter what to block? what to put on instagram on other e social media and in fact they were constantly not only this was said about the democratic party national committee to these media. they are still coordinated this together with the fbi and with other special services. that is, it says that indeed it is all under the control of a certain group, sprouts of individuals, but there are encouraging and good facts. also, first of all. this is already wonderful information that today, on the last issue

, the majority of americans are against the supply of additional money. e in ukraine because that the americans themselves need it? it’s just that a lot of people there say indignantly that we can’t make ends meet, and you send our money to ukraine with us passage yard. the southern border, and you are defending the borders of ukraine and a number of such things that really give the impression that today, if it has not happened, but there is a radical in a word of the previous trend, because here is one of such very serious signals. this is, uh, crocheting, which means during the debate. and after that, i already looked. how much is his performance. g. jan says, listen, there is no

need for any ukraine ever. we don't need no war, we need russia, we push russia china, we need to deal with china and, of course, we must say that we will lift the sanctions if the russians give back a little from their close relations. with china, this is a different matter, but the most interesting thing is that today it is becoming, uh, in general, a serious factor in american political life. if such a vote, but look at 260 million views, there was an interview with trump. uh , that means 260 million hands. and there the main thesis is that war is not needed, escalation is not needed, that biden is leading the country and the world of death, and it will end badly for all mankind,

because the escalation will lead to nuclear war. thank you, let's go to the advertisement and continue our conversation, by the way, about the american elections. mom, i don't have long. i do not want to leave and offer you a contract. we will have to live with you as one family, you and me in my house until my death. today is our first dinner my son's mother premiered on sunday at the first pencil case seven pens and a whole stack of notebooks. yes, if you started shopping on yandex.market with a cashback from it's hard to stop at alpha-bank 10% cashback for everyone on yandex market is free in

august and you get 20% cashback for a whole month. one magnet cosmetic pizza this august 20% discount on the main assortment price, what you need in the world of hundreds is impossible iota says you can try, for a maximum of only 399 rubles. you can iota this is masha she makes her first order on apteka.ru nipples with a 12% discount already kill, and you are fonbet russian football cup large-scale spectacular real punchy. fonbet russian football cup is based on the history of tea richard your majesty is like this. do you know who

everyone is talking about right now? unparalleled royal tea visit cian and find an apartment for rent with real photos and detailed descriptions. rent an apartment easily. my name is maxim my name is alina