[000:00:00;00] they gave it in washington because there was hope that erdogan, but if he puts it that way, the negotiations took place in a very positive tone and, as it were, the process goes on, the process goes on, as they want in moscow and not as they suggest, who they are and it is very important , of course, that in relations between russia and turkey but if you want, apart from the situation of the grain deal, and apart from the energy cooperation positive. eh, and the attitude to diversify. this is not only the traditional areas of our interaction, including rural economic energy, but you develop other directions. which makes me very happy, but we have not made any progress and i hope to complete negotiations

on the creation of a gas pipeline in turkey in the near future in order to sanction the export of our grain and fertilizers and resume supplies of agricultural machinery and spare parts to russia. remove problems with logistics and ship fracts with banking and food supply insurance. moreover, while russia clearly provided security guarantees for shipping, as part of this , the other side used humanitarian corridors for terrorist attacks against russian civilian military installations. for them, we have prepared a new package of proposals, together with the un, i am sure that we will be able to achieve results in the shortest possible time , we will achieve them. well, i don’t know what you think , senator denisov is the first deputy chairman of the federation council committee on foreign affairs and has been an ambassador to china for many years before that, but are you familiar with the language of diplomacy? uh, more than all the rest of us or

do you agree that this is erdogan? eh she sounds like a bummer. balyk head. it means literally. this fish is another fish. well, the analogue in russian is fedot yes, it’s not the same, really erdogan, he seemed to be the same as usual, but at the same time, as you rightly noted, he’s a little different, he’s an emotional person and somehow i’m not a churkolog, and in general. uh, although i saw him, what is called living life, but i can’t judge it somehow, conflicts didn’t happen and russia didn’t want to slam any doors, nor in terms of peace, well, ukraine didn’t have a grain deal and it turned out that this can be make it very constructive. quite rightly so, i completely agree with this. and i would like to draw your attention to one more thing. this, by the way, uh, can be seen from the screens that we have here. note. uh , that's a press conference after all.

you are absolutely right. if you look at the composition of the two delegations. you say it. so this is not a composition of honorable people, uh, who are sitting here as a majestic framing in the audience, these are ministers who clearly conducted their separate negotiations with each other, to really deepen cooperation and when it was talked about, the two are regrouping troops. and who really needs it, because the strength of the attacking brigades of the main e, they are sufficiently battered at the same time, we are regrouping, and we are immediately on the e, in almost all directions of the line of contact. it can only talk about one thing, what uh can be introduced. uh, the new ones are more recent, and the forces in the new attack, most likely, this attack will be. well, if they pulled up reserves, and in general, it was not easy decision, as i understand the high

command. uh, with the filing of the general staff, they say the situation was very difficult and the desire to somehow ease the pressure on the army was more than natural. well, it was one of those situations when , in general, you need to hold on to the end of 15% the distance is actually on the line of work for the willow they are on this line of defense, that is, not on the advanced trenches that yes, but they occupied, namely on the line that passes through heights that it actually exceeds now, so the work is in a lowland. and these ukrainian troops are also located nowhere under constant shelling. in any case, they couldn’t break through this line, i didn’t see a single shot that the ukrainians would have, they love to spread it all very much, not a single one. let's see what happens next. i hope that this is how it will continue, but i want to say that russia has never

refused negotiations. and now we are not giving up. and uh, mr. president raised these questions. today is very much in the course of our meeting. i support them. i, uh, once 10 years ago had the opportunity, and be on one scene, because it is very important for all of us to understand that there is reason to be satisfied with what has happened so far, that it was very difficult, that putin held strategic reserves until, well, it became expedient to use them because ukraine began to use its strategic reserves. but of course, the enemy is so easy. i don’t know if he will agree with me, but the armament is again with aircraft. that is, like ben, the move is already, he says, you need to give planes, you need to give long-range missiles. it is necessary to give more and, accordingly, the mobilization and pulling out of ukrainians who are combat-ready with europe will be guessed under this matter, because

they will be expelled to europe, it is interesting, of course, how. that is, look at this legal moment itself, how they will push the conscripts back to ukraine but i think it will, because, well, from their point of view. let the midst of the presidential campaign die better president biden will this is how to raise the stakes in ukraine do you think they made a conscious decision or it’s just that they didn’t have any other elections and what and what results this can bring to the united states. up to a meter you me for this . uh, a good pass, from which not to score a nine in the head. it would just be a few days ago another few publications and forino, queen and other magazines, that there is no strategy, what we want, where we want, what it will lead to. it says that they are just confused - this is the first

. the second is the easiest to continue this line that continues. here comes the money which they stole from american aid from that, but the most simple obvious facts that were cited, like hundreds of thousands or millions of forms twice as expensive, bought from the difference put themselves in the pocket of the second moment. the issue that zelensky no longer suited anyone is being seriously discussed in kiev. do we want it or is it just danik and what is biden's game like? i'll tell you if there's a game at all. here it is, i just wanted to say that biden does not have his own game. biden, for now , is going with the flow. here we take this

position he drove himself into a corner, what biden said, biden said, uh, when in afghanistan? of course, the american troops could not do anything, they abandoned everything and left 85 billion weapons there, and some thousands and thousands of people who worked for america left there to be slaughtered and fled. god forbid , i would like to hope that they will not bring the ukrainian from russia to this point about easing sanctions before russia does not compensate ukraine for all the destruction during the war. you can submit yourself to the senate break up do it, but with each this is not the first time this statement is heard. as a matter of fact, there, after all, uh, the whole problem is that they cannot find legal moves

in order to implement a real dialogue, but the person who wanted to do this, he is now an employee of the carnegie endowment, as if his public career, which lasted for a decade. uh, it was the first one, no surrender. he didn't offer. uh, russia did not praise america did not condemn. well, such a pragma called personal position, and diplomats should be able to engage in diplomacy. well, if it's too early to be a diplomat, then at least let the experts, uh, can think about this subject, the fact of the matter is what he received in response. let's hear it, kremlin handy the vast majority of russians wouldn't mind a complete russian withdrawal from ukraine at all they wouldn't question putin's authority even if ukraine liberated crimea the idea that russian policy in ukraine could somehow be curtailed from the inside, just an abstract a and

you see this to a professor at the university of california at san diego and he is both a citizen of, uh, the united states and predictably one of the eastern european countries in this case bulgaria this is the atmosphere they call a person the kremlin's henchman you already know, i must say dmitry i did you remember today how you performed at the anniversary session of the valdai meeting, when you sat with roman on the wire with the president of russia there and so on. i have met many times on these forums and a more honest decent wonderful person than anatoly levin i have not seen him he always participated, he was always objective , he was always proud that his ancestors served the russian tsars, because these are

the germans with this. oh well, that is, they live one of his closest relatives neither more nor less. e, commanded the imperial guard, yes, the other , was the governor-general. uh, all these baltic citizens were called provincial republics and two brothers suppressed the uprising there with an iron fist. now they are professors, one at harvard, in my opinion, the other at her. economics yes, yes, so uh what's my point i say this, strange thing with him at all these events, fiona hill participated with them. uh, there, i don't know, uh, a lot of people. uh, the angel stand a whole bunch of people who have always held high positions in the cia there national security councils and so on. here, as soon as any person

says some reasonable things. so immediately he is called the kremlin's assistant to putin's agent, and so on. here is the deceased, of course, steve and so on. he wrote. well, him and this ambassador mirka all in order to discredit one of them. one pattern, here they are all agents of the kremlin, or henchmen or a useful thing, they repeat they say, putin's arguments here, putin says it doesn't work. find today in the so-called mainstream press. find people today who allow you to doubt that russian aggression is taking place in ukraine, and i’m not just saying aggression. it's just that you said it

didn't give your moral assessment enough. unprovoked cruel, but now, when right here, i hear it. i have this feeling, war, it just work. father of all tankers put me. learning market is difficult

10 percent. cool videos spread faster than i thought, because with 5g it's even faster. feel the brightness feel the softness. feel now and branded stores. you know who everyone is talking about now on this chilly day all the talk is only about tea richard fantastic me richard you both richard

the royal send the child to the future it is important to give him the most necessary growth points quanturiums. these cubes, modern knowledge. the latest equipment even in the most remote corners of russia is national projects.rf. national project education. what is the father? listen to american tax payers, you money, where does the natsik add up? yes, no gays, normal gays, he is a scoundrel, but not a fool, he did not remove his genitals , a huge number of farm giants have already divided the ukrainian land into pieces, where you can grow marijuana literally in the cultural genocide of the slavic people. this is the face of that ukrainian mother that western curators want to see. concentration camp overseer he is on air

big game at the end of this week, important international events will take place in india in new delhi, where there will be a g20 session that was supposed to be a very powerful event. but now there are some moments of disappointment about the indian prime minister's fashion, because to equip it, but excuse me, i have such a harsh word, it may not be quite the right term, but twenty, which was created at one time with the aim of collecting it , together uh, representatives of different different parts of the world, well the leading countries that determine the situation of the world economy. for the sake of finding ways out of this or that economic financial and so on crises. the first is to participate in the adoption of collective documents, which are previously developed by experts, so

any summit, as well as through the twenty , is preceded by a ministerial meeting. in this case, finance, foreign affairs, economics and so on. it depends on the country of the chairman, india in this case worked very actively, somewhere there was some very the big figure is more than 60. and maybe even more meetings of different levels were held. well, and the second is such a fateful nature that could. well, if you do not change the situation in the world economy, which, in general, uh, does not please anyone, then at least suggest some ways. in which direction to think, what to do? well, there, for example, the rejection of protectionism. or , let's say, the weakening of the policy of sanctions, which are simply becoming some kind of general character. well, and so on. and nothing is visible yet does not emerge. well, you know, uh, compromise, uh, step back in this situation. just any conversation is useless. well, as far as chinese indian relations are concerned , there will be no reason, so to speak,

to philosophize. there are some here. difficulties uh, so uh, although probably, uh, if there were glimpses in chinese indian relations. after all, in general, they work quite correctly, the embassy maintains relations. and we have what we have, i will reveal a little little secret. why this self this from my point of view can't be for real successful? you know this senator better than me. that in order for diplomacy to be successful it is necessary that both sides have an interest in reaching agreements and there must be a desire to reach an agreement, which could be very useful for this . negotiating with china and russia, how can this be done? after all, if you negotiate with them after these impressions, they are

negotiable. yes, it’s impossible to go on, but such acts that would, as it were , mislead their own people and create the impression that beijing and moscow can deal with. priority is like a fight with another country, and the fight is not where it is really important for you, where your national interests require it, but at the level of primitive propaganda, what happens is what happens. i don't know if you agree with that , you think that biden is going there to negotiate something other than his desire to show that russia is isolated. yes, that's the point. uh, this is also a signal that nothing is being done in china, by chance lavrov, as far as i know, but uh, lichang to some extent resembles our prime minister. he deals with the economy, he deals exclusively with the economy, and this is such a signal that you know that you are there, you can

politicize the agenda as much as you like, demand that china stand on the right side of history there, which happens over and over again and that you really don’t like pushed to this today americans. well, that's great. you know the most important term that is used is the ministry of justice, that is, the use between the organization of internal affairs, as a weapon against their opponents. this the ministry is no longer an organization. inside which is trying to find a solution in the interests of all some questions. and here's how to use it as a weapon, like they do, uh, within the framework of that within the framework of other structures. uh, that's who to punish, and who in turn,

whom they themselves appoint well veronica , we will definitely talk with you at the end of the program. he wanted to ask, uh, dmitry , what is happening, uh, in the event of a ukrainian conflict, general kanashenkov, the official representative of the ministry of defense, and he drew attention to the fact that all these ukrainian drones, including unmanned boats. that they are all assembled from the parts that it supplies. and who pays for all this, how could ukraine organize all this company, which, as andronika mentioned fiona hill, who worked in the white house at trump, and then began to oppose him, also accusing him of being, and even under the influence do not have to say look in your pocket. putin has now appeared on television. said

all these attacks and he decided to mention, when it is that, in general, these types of attacks, as the history of the bombing shows, they rarely lead to the desired results, because these attacks are so ineffective from a military point of view that they do not have the potential to intimidate the russian people, but they have real potential fiona warns to show these people and that it leads to more seclusion of the people of russia and so these attacks are so interesting uh, in russia they say that this is terrorism, this is definitely not a standard military action, but i want you ask, to what extent do you think that this is what ukraine is doing and when they deny it in the west. uh, well, my personal

opinion is that, in principle, yes, well, he shared. that is, they must go with him accordingly. all other tails before the investigation begins and the demands of both the united states and europe , that is, there is still no person. no, the problems are further, as if we start everything from a clean slate, where the money was. this is the tenth question. that is, who pays for technology, but remember that the old history, another series of minim airbases and staro’s attacks can really be set up there and the like. ah, ukraine has quite a decent experience in the field of drones. they have been doing this for a long time, but the technology of this level is beyond their control. this also applies to non-crewed semi-submersible boats, as i already, uh , told on one of your programs . this story has generally been going on since the time of the italian tenth fleet of the masses of the second world war , prince valery barghize. that is, from there it all went like this, and the british, by the way, received well. e, they adopted this experience to the teeth, including, as it were, valery himself, in my opinion, they even hired him as an instructor. e, now

he is going to yes from foreign components. well , because a-and its components. ukraine cannot produce, we also cannot produce our own components. and america has its components. e to complex products, too, such a global world cannot now produce, as well as what is not, in principle, e that country, but i don’t know, maybe tell me which would be done by myself, there were simply no miracles. as for, and so without and maritime drones, the british do it all because, well, it's very similar to their technology. although there, er, they say that there are american ones, but i still think that the british are behind them. they feel the technology of application so that we would, uh, be very guarded in the wording and understand that keep in mind what it means that the british are standing behind our backs. what is their role? as you can see, but britain is famous firstly for its sabotage naval forces - this is the second time britain has also worked out some points of view for a long time. well, if we practically we officially say that in odessa we are

striking at the deployment of the sas and british forces, which are there, the instructors are engaged in training or are not doing anything else. these are, in general, excellent naval saboteurs. here , uh, and returning to this topic, uh, these drones are in small quantities. yes, they are very dangerous. they are dangerous in large quantities, but it seems to me that now there is a probe, not tactics, application technology, because no one knows what. from some time, it will suddenly begin, assembled from the same western parts, to float in the strait, gibraltar or let's get even closer. or in over the persian gulf, and it will be of iranian origin. uh, it could be of american origin. but if the american is building this washington. now, if it will be, uh, iranian or even better somewhere, we their allies will stop donald trump on dmitry, with all the bolshevik frankness, i must say that

it seems to me, i not only uh, want this, but it also seems to me that the democrats will not succeed becomes donald trump, even if donald trump is in a robe in prison, he will republican party candidate. and perhaps from the prison of the prison cell he will come to the white house as president, because there are no such opportunities. but of course there is. so i read every day only about this and they say, as it were. to achieve what senator tim kaine proposes on this issue, here's the senator democrat from the vows, let's hear it. do you think that trump will be removed from the elections in accordance with the 14th amendment of the constitution and discussed this with colleagues at the time of the second impeachment. george i think it would be more effective than the second one. impeachment make a statement under article 14 of the constitution, it's clearly written there, if you support someone who is going against

the us constitution at the moment and the purpose of this was to prevent a peaceful transition of power, as the constitution says, i think that this is given enough on the basis. in my opinion. this will have a result in the courts, but from our side. we must focus on victory in 2024, the frontier until recently. i love this amendment fourteen very much, because this amendment introduced the norm in order to black there was this idea that the right soil had the right of blood. but right treatments were introduced after the end of the civil war against those who are active. where were, where were the anti-government demonstrations? where were the riots? where the hell were there that, well, what a sick fantasy these people have in general, that trump, being the incumbent president,

sitting in the white house, organized an anti-government demonstration with the aim of overthrowing. ah, so the american political regime. but this is complete insanity, which, of course, i honestly myself i wanted to say for a long time that before my eyes the country has political regimes of the system, which,