no, you absolutely need to marry a young , inexperienced girl so that we can raise her, and she will share your views in everything. for example, on the ketta, for example, there is such a girl, i need katerina such, immediately begin to educate. katie right now. give us a lecture. just not about karl marx for god's sake, we made it, but better about geology. if you please, there is a hypothesis, which has not been fully proven, that it is here under us , under your ladies’ shoes, that there was a volcano millions of years ago. yes, a real volcano from a crater from which magma burst out wake up. it was a million years ago, quite in prokhor’s character to drink tea at my place. i want

to talk to you about andrei andreevich. you liked him. well, like me and protasov. it’s impossible. katie andrei andreevich suits you perfectly, or maybe you decided to remain an old girl? no, i’m not, and they’re asking you about yakovlev. why does he know you about me? he talked about school, baby, he didn’t listen to anyone . mikola didn’t listen to god. and i don’t hold it against him. i brought him a gift. and why did you buy anything with money? no it hurts sweet

kissed me, baby. his work torments him and requires all sorts of boring things.

they're passing, i won't go to death, i'm afraid i won't go to grandma with a scythe, i can't stop. chalk man, you'll be left alone, you won't go out, i won't

go in the morning. when i come, i'll go, as you know. are you here? wait , i'm not going to do anything.

others

are just worried. you are the root of the cross for infancy. and when you kill people, do you film? i won't. or is someone harmful to the cause? should i tell you this?

in general, she is being cunning with me, saying that she wants to marry me off to andrei andreevich in reality in fact. she wants to grab him for herself, of course, she is greedy and prokhor petrovich , giving andrei andreevich, does not understand, she thinks, i am a fifa and no one needs me. i feel so sorry for my hand. ugh,

so immodest. i like it, you know how much i like it. i want to open the window and give them all of myself, all of myself. do you know who was there? there was mr. cook where he saw his eyes were as if he would see a ghost, how strange these men are. and terribly terrible, depraved and generally pretty here mr. cuco l what will i eat then or under lock and key? m, bro, oh, how

confusing is it, lady? how confusing everything is. wait, it’s out of sight.

hello there, the swamp will end soon. and what good gold it is here, fortunately it lay in the ground, but there is an evil shaman, a chenille, who scattered the death of people across the earth; if you touch it, it’s almost gone. once

wars start, or even the end of the world will happen. why is this? it was too much for her. or maybe there is no good gold there, maybe there are no people. what do you think? prokhor petrov on i, in my youth, the bride would have praised the milky way, abakan pour stars into your pocket. i 'll steal it, but i'll take my daughter, eh? lya, that’s what you came here for. listen, well, i don’t know myself, they called me and said hall 4,000. to be honest, i thought it needed to be plastered. well, there you go.

class of 2023 reunion on saturday at first i told you, i'm married. whichever one you prefer, the weight will be softer, but i’m married. national lottery birthday we have prepared something big in september. we are doubling online lottery winnings from october 1st. he has a super prize of 200 million tickets at the post office and naloga.ru is better when twice as much jammahay is made from pieces of berries and fruits, it helps make my dishes truly delicious gemma kane 100% natural. and it looks like you don't remember

the correct answer. if a simple question turns into a quiz. may help for lunch for lunch helps improve brain function, restore memory and concentrate . nept to keep your head working. loan at tinkoff, we approve your plans apply for a loan in the tinkov app and receive a deferment of the first payment for up to 90 days tinkoff he is the only one. at the scooter, we knew that people needed an unusual shower gel, and svetlana knew how to add some spice to them; the scooter is doing well together yandex voice control with alice unlimited content and all the capabilities of the station bro is a security service. tell me the code from the sms, if you

manage to trick me, i will return the stolen money to the customer for protection from phone bearings. angionorm helps to improve microcirculation, reduce the risk of blood clots, relieve inflammation and strengthen the walls of blood vessels, angionorm, keep the blood vessels normal, everything, what you are interested in is collected in the vk video application and even top bloggers have vk video here and not like that. there are even dramas and thousands more films and tv series all seasons and even live broadcasts there is a vk video application

, everything you are interested in, watch everything and even more. sberbanquet, i yes and give give, give for the starons, food hot food spermmarket we deliver from cafes restaurants for free feel the tenderness feel the brightness. feel the softness. feel it. all multi-layered interesting combination decide what to wear at the last moment in the trend to wear austin is all about fashion, get your card and take part in a closed sale of air tickets with discounts

of up to 50%. find out the details on s7.ru if hemorrhoids make up acrobatic performances. try the complex drug gepatrombin g. three active components of hepatrombin at once relieve pain by two ; it is capable of acting immediately after using gepatrombin for the treatment of hemorrhoids one, two, three times. we knew at the scooter that people would warmly welcome iced tea, and daniil would welcome the original technology for its production. the group will be divided in a certain way, we are for this one half and the other are against such a reform in the theater. i said that i will remain those whom you will not take, she did not leave the theater.

she just slept in the makeup room from this crazy fatigue, and on her day off she decided to film, i love a melancholy, melancholy woman, the only one unlike anyone else, thank god if she were like everyone else, we’d probably be bigger. i wouldn’t go around so much with the legendary oil in rumors democratic, but not to such an extent doronina today on the first yes, i’m curious about your wonderful character me character. you just need to understand it.

they are the golden ones of the earth. how many years have you been looking for them? thought that you thought them tungus

look, you will deceive them. blame yourself, why should i lie? prokhor petrov, look

, the application has been made. yes, that means gold. it seemed to god that the disease is the master , heavy gold is made so that you are the master and you with the master’s vodka today. petrov the main shame will be spent on you. the reconnaissance ends, i go to the residence, and there is an application from engineers. i will send more workers.

the road is bad, you know the quagmire, you will please inadvertently. i always

give you beef porridge for mishka. she grew up , tell me, what’s better than that she came with her mother yesterday, she got sick, and didn’t come out to meet her, the cashier’s father was sleeping on the couch in the office today. the same story. well, tell her not to cry, she cries and cries , the young lady is full of chatter. why is she crying not considered, they say, the monastery, i succumbed to grief, ibrahim, the first husband of the barbarians , was also a victim, but we live with you and the university. sorry, we don't blow in the future place. i'm a newborn asking almost.

i wouldn’t look at prokhor, he’s a well-known charlatan, in part ladies' hearts. it’s not the governor’s will. the news has arrived. our application did not arrive, the plot is occupied. you became his about 100 years ago, or even more, a certain gentleman brought him up. what kind of surname does the blacksmith prosecutor come across, remember?

it means he staked out a plot of land and dug up gold, after which the robbers caught fir trees in the taiga. they tilted his crotch and straightened it out. the forks were released and tore into two slices. that's the end of pripyat. but this is a sign from the past, give up, give up, what are you talking about filatovich, as if he spoke in a language that was not his own, and did not see tradition as a sign. well, oh, the gold fever has overcome you. your daughters have just gotten married, but everyone is turned away, because he honors his father and the drunkard doesn’t want to leave alone. yes, comfort is not what i have. this is your preferred heir,

nephew, who has shown up. i asked the rubbish little man, the gambler in the capital is hanging around. i'm going there tomorrow, you're with me. will you buy it? are you approaching your daughter? open i said, well. come earn

money from honest work. what a damn nun you are, don't give birth to a son, and then connor show. he has a belly under his tail.

the big game is on air today, the main international event is the plenary session at the eastern economic forum, where president putin took part , the president made a number of important statements, but i will start with the one that is, from my point of view, the most relevant, given, but if you want, our circumstances of today . let's listen to what putin said about the military situation in ukraine . the so-called counter-offensive results are being carried out correctly. no, of course we won't now

to say failure is not right. no loss results. there are large losses of personnel at the beginning of this counter-offensive - 71,500 people, and at any cost , as they say, they want to achieve a result, sometimes they get the impression that these are not their people at all, who throw in this counter-offensive as if they are not their people at all. here, their chosen process begins in november. at any cost they need to show at least some result and they are pushing the ukrainians to propose military action. why in public? they didn’t say because they don’t feel sorry for the ukrainians. oddly enough, today’s ukrainian leadership doesn’t feel sorry for throwing their people into the furnace, that’s all. will this change anything? i think that no, i’m sure that no it will prolong the conflict, yes it does.

for me, the president said a very important thing at the end of the statement that we quoted. does it change anything essentially ? no, but it drags on. yes, it drags on. but let's call a spade a spade. uh, general buginsky, professor of embroidery economics and uh to our great pleasure a regular participant in our program. well, here's the general. it's addictive when we talk. that's what it is. in general, this is a very serious statement, because it means that russian resources are being diverted. therefore, i cannot be so, uh, neutral about what is happening on the battlefield as a result of the ongoing much increasing assistance from the collective west and so that there is

complete clarity of what nature this assistance is? let's see, as if from the section, they say let's listen to what he said about this. the chairman of the committee of chiefs is in step with general marmel. you help ukraine choose military targets; the targets are chosen by ukraine and it has all the powers to attack. impact. we inform her about the current situation. you are to them. you say there is a command post there, there is an ammunition depot. we provide them with information about the current state of affairs. how possible is this? that is, it really is. proxy war. you are not fighting in this territory, do not make decisions, but you are helping ukrainians kill russians, we we help ukrainians defend themselves. that's what we do. we help ukrainians defend themselves , general your reaction. you know the chairman of the committee of chiefs of staff. of course he is disingenuous. this is what they showed, this is a specially uh

room, as it became known, a situation room specifically for ukraine where the situation is monitored in real time, taking into account the capabilities of the americans in space reconnaissance. e, i. naturally, they don’t just tell ukraine that this goal is located there and there, but they implement it. uh, goal uh goal setting and purpose of indication. e. i am absolutely sure of this, that, well, the ukrainians can, of course, make some kind of independent decision, but everything is under the strict control of the americans. now to the uh essence of what the president said at the eastern economic forum. yes, you really know, these are the losses, the losses of the ukrainians are 71 1/200 - this is since june 4 during this offensive operation. this,

of course, is off the charts. uh, about technology. i'm not saying there are 543 tanks, 18,000. uh, armored vehicles. well the technology is, of course, pathetic, but most importantly the people are not in vain. uh, zelensky started. well, you know , such a not-so-parliamentary expression began to whine that he was not being supplied enough, or was being delivered at the wrong time, but look, uh, the supplies are really very metered. right now, uh, yes, and every time, uh, we’re talking about the fact that there’s a line of wunder waffles or a wunder waffle, there’s a miracle weapon, now we’re talking about missiles. eh, let's put it this way. more long- range than it was before, this is an american ms attack missile and perhaps tauras. uh, german is 300 km of the same 500

km, but uh, yes, what about these missiles, let’s say. so atak ms, there are two versions, one is launched, er, from hummers. uh, one missile at a time, uh, and more modern options. this is uh, with uh mlr launcher with uh, two missiles. uh, the americans have 2,500 of these missiles, with a total of four thousand fired. uh, mostly old samples old samples. this is exactly the one that is launched from the hymers, they are equipped with fragmentation. uh, they were charged with a fragmentation head. e. accuracy they are not very big in order. uh, plus or minus 50 m. eh, more modern plus or minus 10 m, there’s also an inertial system. uh, guidance has also been added , space navigation, but again the americans

are dragging their feet on the delivery of these missiles, because, naturally. this is another step of escalation. and they can see uh. this is an escalation, they don’t really want it yet, but the duration of hostilities. they will naturally be delayed if these missiles are delivered. of course, they will be supplied, probably in limited quantities, but this will lead uh, of course, although we have learned to our, for example, great pleasure. we've learned to intercept and uh to the side. and uh a missile that is launched from humvees, until the ms attack we uh learned to intercept naval drones. we are successfully sinking them, we are sinking high-speed boats with uh landing assault groups, that is, our effectiveness of

counter-actions from my point of view. it is very high, but nevertheless, i repeat once again, it prolongs the conflict. and this doesn't make it possible. uh, to the ukrainian leadership realize. eh, all the futility and destructiveness of the future. eh, the americans are not allowing them to stop further confrontation for now. the americans are not allowing them, they are not allowing them, but a year ago we discussed it at this table. these are exactly the missiles from yes, and then we had a very good quote. e from the white house. that the provision of these missiles was not considered, this was their expression from the white house, not mine, is not considered, because from the point of view of the white house, it would look like a step towards the third world war.

that was then. but let's hear what the american government is writing about this now. ukraine insists that the united states give the go-ahead for the supply of missiles, atacama, on september 18, when the un general assembly begins, joe biden is expected to take part in it. and vladimir zelensky however, american officials argue that this is too tight a time frame. the decision will almost certainly be made after the general assembly. biden is inclined to transfer the decision will be made after the general assembly. i would like to remind you that there will be a general assembly. eh, literally in a week. that is, we are talking about in the very near future, you have repeatedly said, general, that there is not one miracle of weapons that could allow ukraine to win this war or even achieve a decisive turning point from my point of view. it's

pure, really. from my point of view. it is also true that this war changes its character. here it has begun. like a special military operation, which russia , in fact, from my point of view, agreed to very reluctantly, after they came to the conclusion that only diplomatic opportunities had been exhausted and it would not be possible to stop only the movement of ukraine towards nato but it was not possible to establish the pumping of ukraine with western weapons systems. it was only then, but this war began as a russian special military operation, right? and at the beginning , the west helped limitedly and thought very much about how to avoid escalation, but recently they began to behave as if escalation

was no longer a serious concern for them. alexander dugin , philosopher, political scientist, author of books , the united states is well aware of geopolitics, you know. why is the united states not afraid? more escalation. i think that they look at the whole situation very carefully, very carefully and weigh, if you like , a strategic game; they sometimes increase the pressure and increase the degree of escalation . little by little, one at a time, they are stretched out. as you said, for a year, probably for six months , they look at it, which is what makes it different, because in fact , escalation is a game for two. that is, if you increase the level of escalation, and they don’t answer you. this is an invitation to raise it another degree, that is, in this case, perhaps we haven’t found it yet. we don't don't don't

started playing this game because we were coloring. the americans, or the americans see it, are on the rise. we are a degree they are shah uh, in one direction of the mice. they see that they are taking a step and then another, and russia is what they would have thought and imagined as a response to this level of escalation. we don't, or can't, or don't want to, once they come to a conclusion. i think a lot of you, coordinating the analysis after listening to different sides, come to the conclusion that we can’t then they raise it again and look again and again, but we are conventional types they fire cluster munitions there, like cluster munitions. we promised to use them, but we don't use them. at least. this is unknown information, no, they are still extending some kind of line and are starting to bomb our cities. we continue to behave the same way as before, that is, they see some asymmetry. they raise the temperature. and

we either lag behind in terms of our own degree, or we don’t increase at all, whatever it may be. we, of course, don’t know the secrets, but maybe you know our scythian tactics. uh, the civilization is very, very ancient and uh, from time to time we reproduce this scythian tactic, we drag a stronger enemy into our territory, pretend that we are retreating, this is both hitler and napoleon, this is a traditional scythian strategy throughout our history. and when it seems to him that now he has only an outstretched hand left, he has already taken everything. and now he will end us at this time from the missing resources due to the missing armies that have retreated. uh retreated people. suddenly there comes a swift and fatal blow, after which the entire system of this attacking attacking enemy collapses, but who knows, that’s the point, that is, if we consciously wait until they raise this degree to

a critical point and believe. our own integrity, and we will finally deal a decisive blow to them. this is the first version. this is the scythian theory, if you like, very often confirmed in our military history, but of course, we don’t know this, so maybe they are right. they see that we are unwilling or unable to respond to this escalation, and this forces them to promote her too. i think that no one in this situation can be completely sure to say that i know how in fact, we can analyze this in america. i think they don’t fully know that this is how skif is a tactic or vice versa russia is simply weak and cannot respond to this escalation. but this is definitely an invitation - an invitation to supply missiles to anyone. there is a radius to turn a blind eye to any attack on russian cities and cross all red lines. if we really can't or don't we decide to answer. well, it seems to me that russia decides to respond in many

ways, a and if we are talking about the situation on the battlefield, then the general knows better than me what is being done there, but it is being done, frankly speaking, a lot, and in addition to the battlefield there are attacks on infrastructure, a and in many ways, the strike was successful . partial mobilization was carried out many months ago; reserve units were created, which play a very important role in repelling the ukrainian offensive today. it seems to me that this is not something that, uh, russia is sitting watching and either they’re not capable decide, or there is some kind of scythian plan, it seems. what happens when russia increases its resistance, including offensive operations? this is still causing a blow to ukraine and very serious blows, and it seems to me that

washington, brussels, and london are not stopping the strikes on ukraine, as long as there are no strikes that would be painful for the united states itself. why are these strikes not taking place? i don’t know that either, but let me make one observation that when we talked a year ago about the possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons and generals i even argued about this and the general, of course, turned out to be right, tactical weapons were not used, but i was not necessarily wrong either, because we were talking about a situation where ukraine was developing a successful offensive. but today there is no such successful offensive, and therefore the use of tactical nuclear weapons and even conversations about this would be

untimely from a military point of view, and from a political point of view they could only contribute to the isolation of russia , so it is clear why the russian government does not want while there is an endless need to follow this path. that is the question. i have a feeling, i will allow myself a somewhat crude expression, that of russian restraint. leads to sensation. immunity from russian retaliation that does not exist in practice, and in leading western capitals, i don’t know what you think about this general. are we in danger? that russian restraint in a position of strength is perceived as something completely different, as

a mandate for permissiveness and thus we are objectively only raising the temperature confrontation is something that we are trying and successfully managing to avoid today. could this turn into a really serious escalation in the foreseeable future? you know dmitry, if uh, i ’ll go back a little, uh, to where you started, how our special operation began. by the way, it’s now a special military operation. a and a actually, it started e not only because we didn’t want to be there, but i’m sure, and then it was confirmed that our intelligence had information that the ukrainians. what did they concentrate? group in the donbass of 120,000 people and were clearly preparing and then confirmed with the documents that were already there. uh, during

our offensive, our troops obtained that we were a little ahead of them, that is, we started in february. they were betrayers. and this was a pre-emptive strike, moreover, a pre-emptive strike, uh. so you say that from my point of view, we still are. eh, we fight with white gloves. yes, we are striking at infrastructure. yes, we strike at critical infrastructure, but we still do it all the time and the president emphasizes our military that we hit. only uh, military purposes. we avoid. eh, the great is possible, the defeat of civilians, we are avoiding some objects. uh, some uh, civilian casualties . although, uh, the enemy. uh, so to speak , it’s shelling our peaceful cities, donbass, uh, other cities, they love it there. eh, why? they strike compo, hitting residential buildings, killing civilians, killing children, but we

nevertheless show great restraint. you understand, uh, using tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of ukraine is pointless because we are actually striking at our own territory. and to use tactical nuclear weapons against, let’s say, the allies of the americans, that is, there, well, i won’t name it specifically, but in the countries bordering ukraine, it’s natural to raise this. uh, the level of escalation to such a level that it will be further, i absolutely repeat this again and again. i do not believe that nuclear conflicts involving the russian federation of the united states are possible to control the escalations that are inevitable and will end. this is all an exchange of strategic means across the united territory. states and the russian federation well, that is, it will be mutually guaranteed destruction,

but if you remember, uh, march february march last year, when the special military operation began, when our uh paratroopers ended up in gostomel. do you remember the panic in kiev when yes, this is, well, state po 100 m. this is a military airfield in the suburbs of kiev. do you remember the panic when all the embassies were removed and uh, they urgently headed west to lviv when all the roads were packed and panic began in the ukrainian capital. so i think that if we , now, struck the capital, and struck, there is no need to hit residential areas there, but we need to hit. uh, administrative publications, what the americans did, by the way, when they bombed belgrade, uh, in 1999 and baghdad, but in belgrade

it was the most, so to speak, so, uh, it was prominent , or what? that is, they struck bridges and struck the ministry of defense general staff building. well, uh, as they say, they accidentally struck the chinese embassy, ​​which i don’t really believe either. and all this was done, so to speak. eh, quite purposefully. now, if we, for example, struck now. we struck a military intelligence building, but it was a little off to the side, not in the central part of the city. but if we destroyed the ministry of defense building, if we struck a bank, i think e our former partners, in particular the americans, they would think deeply while we really. i say we fight with white gloves and don’t take them off yet their. i think it's time to take them down; we don't hit them. i say, again this is uh, well, i don’t know how many times in my life

i and many experts have already said two tunnels , four railway bridges, there are several locomotive depots, but if you destroy all these supply routes, so that the americans will think about how them to supply heavy equipment to the conflict zone. it’s not being done yet, but i think that’s just me . i hope that things are going to the point that we will still carry out our own operation, and we won’t carry it out according to western patterns, as ukrainians there with reinforced battalion tactical groups, and we will carry them out according to soviet canons with a massive missile and bomb strike on the main targets, good artillery preparation. eh, and further, so to speak, with the breakthrough of defense e. good offensive grouping i don’t want to general argue about whether it is

actually possible to use nuclear weapons to control the situation and avoid a third world war. i don’t want to use you and i on this matter , we clearly have different opinions, but uh, i agree with you that this is not a timely conversation and the specific combat situation does not require this at all, and empty talk, therefore , would be a dangerous shaking of the air in the interests of those who want to incriminate russia of non-existent intentions to start the third world war if this situation changes. if this were to arise, there would be a need, which does not exist now, to use some very serious defensive, if you like, methods of responding to the enemy. then, as they say, we will talk and argue, but not now. and now

what worries me is, after all, alexander club i'm worried about. here's how we can convince the american leadership about the real danger that they will provoke a massive russian response just what the general said. i completely agree that a lot more can be done and i think that at least some things, and not just some things, but a significant number of things that the general said will be done, which i am not sure about. this is what destroys even the most serious buildings. in kiev, it is possible to convince washington personally of president biden in the midst of his election campaign that he is being killed because of this ukrainians and destroy ukrainian uh decision-making bodies in order to

decide on this matter for the second time during his presidency. he has already presided once during the shameful defeat in afghanistan. but this was, as it were, at the beginning of his presidency, and here it is right in the midst of the election campaign. do you think there could be some decisive , decisive actions in ukraine that do not involve? a? and the answer outside ukraine can such actions limited by ukraine change the mood in washington from my point of view? uh, yes they can, but we have to approach this from the position of claudication, the classic strategy of the keyboard had such an important idea, which is still in service with all the armies of the world - this is the center of gravity in america, it is called so uh, it began with such a special term. a-a l mensov led, that is, the most significant national elements

of infrastructure. so, any war , when it is waged, when it is planned or when they think and begin with the fact that these centers of gravity are determined, that is, they include political leadership, that is eliminating the person who leads the confrontation. the country is the most important and the center of gravity of no person significantly weakens its structure. these are ideological centers that feed spirit, culture , and courage, opposing these to the base of strategic management. that is, the one who truly makes decisions, and not only those who execute them, are infrastructure facilities of key importance. and after choosing these centers of gravity, if it is impossible to destroy them. if we don't reach them the war is becoming so protracted and the man said the president , but here i have the following answer to your very interesting question very serious dmitry in my opinion, it is not the ukrainians who are waging this war, but

the americans and not all americans who are waging this war and the british and their allies are located outside the territory of ukraine. many of them are located on the territory of ukraine and we should have mine. without vision, some picture of how they are, where they are, what they are doing, how they are moving? and this is it. on my look, center of gravity. they are on enemy territory in the territory of the illegitimate aggressive nazi regime. they are fighting against us as an illegal target in our special military operation. why not send? they have such games of their own - this is a double moment. this is a moral moment if american coffins come from there en masse. there's enough there to imagine it's like a massive movement of coffins. first and second, if we strike those present first by declaring

this is the main goal of our our just holy war, therefore the center of gravity. we 'll really make them think. we will not transfer to the situation on nato territory, we will not use tactical nuclear weapons, not against ukraine. this is really the general right, he says, dasha of the territory, as we will our people about our territory, even if we do not control the time, subject it to nuclear strikes we will not provoke a nuclear war, but we will destroy the americans, the british, the french, if we make them a priority target, not so much banking, not so much this joke peas, something like peas, not this servants, not this, abnormal, service personnel, except for those ideological centers that feed them. we don't pay attention to them either. and this is a very important element of any classical war. now, if you ask our generals, our leadership.

you know who is the ideologist of the war against us in ukraine, i think it never occurred to them, and there is no point in thinking about it. but in vain, because someone cooked it here too, of course, there were western curators, but there were and are certain carriers of this radik ukrainian nazi idea, who, with their public intellectual social public activities, they actually strengthen the morale of our enemy, the legitimate goal of laws, therefore, if we make a very accurate adjustment of these centers of gravity or as americans say national elements, the most significant national elements. we can achieve a very painful and serious result without destroying, as you lead to, but bridges across canada or the usa well, i didn’t propose to destroy anything at all. well, i’m saying, i’m saying, i

’m saying that rational politicians should have an understanding that they can respond as it turns out. absolutely right. say a lot of things from my point of view that are very valuable and very insightful. there is one problem with your logic. you are dealing with people at the head of america, from my point of view, who are very illogical and general. he knows better than me how sometimes during military operations amateurs who go to some well, very strange and unreasonable moves, how can they gain some kind of temporary tactical advantage. and i have a feeling that it is very difficult to have a rational conversation with the administration. this is that common logic, common sense, from which we are somehow trying to proceed, and which we usually

expected from the american leadership, at least in previous experience there could be very anti-russian presidents, anti-soviet presidents. people are very warlike. well, how did you understand that they have national interests. what's this something if you do. this will inevitably cause a very strong reaction. and you can afford something that they also understand one simple thing, that’s what the general says in a strategic nuclear conflict there cannot be winners, that it would be extremely destructive. well, you see biden, he seems to love his wife and son. he loves his very much, see how he protects him. they behave this way, but as if they had already decided that