and as they say, friends are made in trouble, russia is not in a period of trouble, but there are definitely serious trials. and so we look at who is now reaching out to russia and i’m not saying. oh, as a person, let's say, who believes that everything good wins only because it is good and natural. the state has its own national interests, but it seems to me that it is clearly in the national interests of russia, but if you want to start collecting to me, which were scattered scattered in the nineties. now let's listen to what he said about this leader of north korea now russia has risen to a sacred struggle to defend its state sovereignty and protect security and resist the hegemony of forces directed against russia. we have always

supported and support your vladimir vladimirovich decision and the decision of the russian government, we will always stand together with russia in the fight against imperialism because of- for the sovereignty of the state. senator andrei klimov is deputy chairman of the federation council committee on international affairs. i want to ask you, senator. here is a statement that made, and the head of korea do you know anyone other than president lukashenko who would make similar statements with such unconditional support for russia? here, probably, we should not talk about who we know. of course, there are politicians who make similar statements, but it is important that that, in contrast to very many states. uh, the democratic republic of korea is a state sovereign. sovereign, and i’m not afraid to say that let’s say you correctly called american publications, including british ones, who talk about this, and they talk about

they say this much more seriously than when they talk about something happening in europe, for example, because in europe they deal with those whom they can call or call themselves to the embassy, ​​but in the dprk this is impossible. and this is the process that we are witnessing today. it didn't start yesterday. some time ago i was drunk and already under a new leader and saw how closely they were watching. there behind what is happening in our country. and now at the beginning of this year. there were just direct, frank signals that we were ready stand side by side we are ready to be literally on the same page and it is natural that these relationships are beginning to develop more actively and the current synchronization of watches that is now taking place in the russian far east with our closest neighbor. but still, this is really the closest neighbor, and this meeting has global significance. it shows our

enemies that we are united, and it shows our potential friends that we can talk to our common opponents anyway. and you are right that there are, uh, countries, leaders who say, in general in a similar way, but they are , as a rule, far from russia and their military capabilities, of course, are not comparable with the capabilities of the korean people's democratic republic. what draws my attention to this situation? it's not just kind words and good intentions. but the fact is that, in general, we are talking about a serious military power. why do you think, and not just like that , they reached out to russia again, this didn’t happen today, you have to keep in mind. and, of course, uh, if this is what happened regarding the dprk during our crisis. this one

lasting into the nineties. it makes it difficult for many of my fellow citizens to understand the real situation. and today, uh, it happened and this is actually very positive for us and for us and for uh our neighbors with the dprk that not only is there a coincidence of interests, but also this historical cat, which did not arise out of nowhere, it begins trigger. that is, those investments, if you can use this with mental questions to questions related to your brother in arms, they begin to work. and uh, we still have people there, who remember that period of time and these matri. they begin to fall into and strengthen each other. so here , you correctly noted the military-technical component of this process, but i would not focus on this . there is a lot more interesting and important there, and the fact that we are getting out of this dead end,

in which we found ourselves either unwillingly or by the will of our days, has only been shown since the nineties . this is truly a positive process and the further we go along this path, the more friends we will have. we uh, will arise or will rise from our past. we had huge investments, the same kind in africa and latin america, and what is happening now in africa when people come out with our flags after the change of power. after all, it was not us who sent them these flags. they go out and this process themselves. i think it will only gain momentum. that is, what is happening also has enormous global significance, in addition to the military one. thank you e. ruslan pukhov is a leading military expert and, to our great pleasure, a regular participant in the program. tell me from a military-technical point of view the senator is absolutely right, the negotiations concerned a much wider range of issues, but it is quite clear that during military operations, a military-technical country is where you want to start the conversation.

you know what it means for russia, what russia gains if there is an opportunity for closer cooperation with singing. uh, korean people's democratic republic, by the way, like a. capitalist korea south are two countries that have made a colossal leap forward in the last 30-40 years in the field of military-technical cooperation and weapons production. in fact, from the screwdriver assembly of some soviet systems or western systems to the creation of our own absolutely original things. i'll say more. uh northern cinnamon turned out to be very insightful. unlike, say, many , including us, by the way, they always believed that the role of cannon artillery was unimportant. uh, traditional or uh multiple launch rocket systems will be very important and they have very actively invested in the development of uh hmm artillery

missile technology and let's say in terms of the level, uh, power and artillery systems. the same caliber as the soviet ones, much longer-range than ours. it's more paradoxical. yes, this is the paradoxical e of a defeated teacher. yes, that is, there are a number of technologies in which the north koreans have surpassed their friends, teachers, the soviet union and russia, and therefore, in fact, if such a political decision is made, i think north korea has something that we can provide with another extremely important point , and we know that russia, in a number of ways, is a country where there is no there are enough labor resources. yes, and the koreans, again this is very interesting, not only northern, but also southern in this sense, they are one people yes, very disciplined and hardworking people, therefore, in a number of positions, where we have migrants, uh, who work in a number of enterprises , and in

construction in the field of improvement. here are all the cases of attracting korean labor migrants from all russian entrepreneurs, both private and public, and everyone was very satisfied, so we really, if we get away from some this is a cartoonish attempt to troll north korea as a country with a communist regime, and so on, and exactly, they have something to offer us, both in the field of high-tech and in the field of high-tech. this is of course very impressive. and in general, somehow this was apparently known, but was not considered important enough to seriously look at the possibilities of strengthening relations with pyongyang. let's see what president putin's press secretary dmitry peskov says and the prospects for these relations. the truth, first of all, is that north korea is our close neighbor

and despite any comments about the cries. from the outside, we will build relationships in a way that is beneficial to us and beneficial to our neighbors. in any case, the full range of relations implies dialogue and interaction in sensitive areas such as military interaction and exchange of views on the most pressing issues in the field of security. this will also be carried out; all other issues concern two countries, sovereign countries and should not be a matter of concern to third states, for our cooperation is carried out for the benefit of the peoples of our two countries, but not against it. we already know whoever it is. that the issue of sanctions was also discussed during the negotiations. the united nations sanctions that were adopted earlier, including with the consent of russia, now, of course, have completely different conditions and circumstances. russia and russia’s experience in the field of sanctions is completely

different, but nevertheless, these sanctions continue to remain, who can really do about this? andronik mihran , a well-known political scientist and also a regular participant of our program. well, i think the answer to this question is obvious, first of all. when, against its will and desire , it joined some sanctions, and russia joined these sanctions not because it was the initiator. not because it promoted; moreover, russia was. uh, among those six in the late nineties who discussed korean issues under president clinton. and by the way, bolton was a negotiator on the american side who became the national security adviser. yes he was then deputy secretary of state, in my opinion, and

so, uh, there were several cases in the village of certain circumstances. uh, just not wanting to go into confrontation with the international community in the case of iran from korea, by the way, in these two cases we supported some sanctions, but not all sanctions, because the americans have always proposed very tough severe sanctions, but in the current conditions, it is absolutely obvious that you participated, you never know, supported something. master, you took part then, and now, despite the fact that formally it’s as if you are there, but in fact no one is stopping you from applying any sanctions, not adhering to any uh, these norms and measures, because we are dealing with countries

, we especially, of course, one country, the united states, which says that strictly speaking, no international legal norms exist. there are rules that they follow, and they themselves determine the rules every time, and therefore no one is stopping the russian side from speaking now. well, in general, we are unilateral . i don't know if i need to say this but getting out of these sanctions is quite obvious, but i am a logical question. and when you worked in new york for many years, i know that you were friends with vitaly churkin and the russian ambassador for the reorganization of the united nations and you know how, uh, the process works there, do i understand correctly that if russia is in a unilateral it came out of these sanctions in order or simply began to ignore them, public or not so

publicly, and without a new resolution of the un security council it was impossible to punish russia. that's true, but the thing is, uh, i think that this question uh hmm in my opinion at this stage. it's kind of obvious to us. why because we can adhere to may not adhere to us uh, no sanctions. nobody will scare north korea, because the west has already accepted everything that is conceivable and unthinkable, so they have no leverage. no. i don’t see any reason for us not to adhere to these sanctions, but that’s another matter. we can not. that's what we can't do now. and then we could do we could in the security council then impose these sanctions on it and

prevent the application of sanctions. now , unfortunately, we cannot unilaterally remove them. this is a shame, but this time i ’ll tell you. eh, there was a lot of things they didn’t know and didn’t understand. uh, i lived in the united states, and uh, in general, i knew the washington clothes stems well . i can tell you with a bad hand on my heart that i did not expect that the crusade that we see today would be declared against russia. and i know that you regularly met in the united states with american experts and official persons. i don’t know how you , i didn’t expect such a turn of events, you know america is truly a great country, but like any great country, if a great sin is created, it is simply colossal in size. they are defaming us that we are, so to speak, there with north korea, the communist regime of biden , going to vietnam there, it seems, is also not

a liberal democratic regime in order to strengthen ties with one marxist leninist dictatorship and against another marxist leninist dictatorship. at the same time we are told that it is impossible to violate sanctions, it’s a matter of course, and at the same time, the americans are conducting behind-the-scenes negotiations with the iranians on the exchange of virtual hostages, foreign citizens, not including american ones, who are detained in iran quite possibly on trumped-up charges and vice versa, and also pay 6 billion from those frozen by iran. and when are we trying to do something there to say? well, it’s simply impossible, what is allowed, because they believe that they can do whatever they want and from them, uh, in general, there will be no demand, but for everyone else they have questions that's why this is something that has always amazed me in america is the huge number of, uh, talented people,

really a very free side, especially for entrepreneurship, but at some point it clicks. and that’s all, these are our interests and all the rules, like the nut whore yes , they are simply swept off the table, that is, when it is beneficial for the united states, these rules are observed, as soon as it is unprofitable. this is instantly ignored. and no one even feels wounded for sure. uh, and this is the american political country culture. i knew, and uh, probably a lot of people knew, in general, who they were, who seemed to be quite authoritative and influential, who only understood all this, which we didn’t expect. these are these degrees of rage of this focus on uh russia as an evil empire that is much more severe. i would say, more ominous than what they saw and saw everything happen before

my eyes, and as a senator i had such an episode. there was a leading american senator, you probably knew him, robert dollar. well, of course, who was even the father of the armenian people on the post of president who was before this, and the leader of the senate majority of veterans of the second world war, the veteran of the second world war is a very valuable person and must confess among my other sins, and i was twice, and an adviser during his two election campaigns. he was a foreign policy realist then, he was for agreements then. first with the soviet union, then with russia, he then spoke about the fact that america needs a peace dividend and that after the end of the cold war it is necessary, firstly , to build new relations with russia up to

considering issues of inviting russia to nato and certainly not entering into unnecessary conflicts with moscow, all this began to change in the mid- nineties as a result of the balkan warriors. when suddenly they discovered that russia can be ignored and not just ignored, but the russians will agree to this and will play by the new rules established by washington, and during the campaign of 1996 i spoke very clearly about this as a senator. we personally had a very good relationship. and i asked him about this change in his position, and he told me absolutely, as it seems to me , he says frankly, well, yes, me and john mccain ladies were in your camp of realists. yes, we were against the united states

intervening in the balkan wars. but we were wrong, the united states intervened in the balkan wars. and what did you get and get a victory? without real complications arising with russia, that is, russia is no longer a great power. and we don’t need, like during the cold war , to ask you every time how moscow and these times have passed and so many people who were previously supporters of a pragmatic foreign policy. in their eyes, they remained pragmatic figures, only pragmatism no longer included russia as a great power, don’t you think that this is one of the if you want, the root factors of the current conflict between the collective west and russia, you know, there is also personal

experience of communicating with various american colleagues , and then about the period that you are talking about, and later, especially after the 2000s , and i should note that here, probably, several factors. one factor, indeed, these are the concessions that russia was forced to make somewhere, due to a misunderstanding, i will express myself so carefully in the nineties, somewhere it was triggered by the lack of experience of that generation of politicians who then found themselves at the helm of state power in my country, but if another and different trend is the degradation of the political class in the united states of america, this is exactly what i saw, and this happened at the master classes. well, just in my eyes. yes, and i, especially in the late nineties, there were quite i also often stopped by and talked, there and on the capitalist hill, with different people. and then there was there was this euphoria victory i

remember, even how they looked at me, as if, well, someone like that had come to them there. here we are, american senators. we did something else in this spirit and immediately talked about what and how we should do it. before we even had time to say anything, they came. they worked on this stencil and personally, i associate this with my opinion. all this with, uh, clinton's victory and the establishment of this, this clan he, of course, it’s not formalized in any way, but there is a well-known clinton foundation, there are attempts , so to speak , to promote something to his husband somewhere, then we understand that obama did not appear out of nowhere and the canoe did not appear out of nowhere. if you count how long all this lasted. this lasted 30 years from 1993. here i am 23 years old, 30 years old with little experience. and during these breaks. they did not completely relinquish power. and during this time they will also do a lot of things, the third fact is to form that public which today begins to broadcast and

carefully defend these things, liberal globalist ideas, which we actually see in an attempt to imprison trump, either for 500 or 600 years. i don't even owe 700. they say, some say it's just better to calmly strangle. well, if there are such specialists, and in the united states of america there are even official methods, as i know, they have already tried to carry out the death penalty on one citizen twice. at first we tried to give an injection to the veins, but they weren’t allowed, but that didn’t help. question for us. in fact. here is the degradation of the elite and the actual dictatorship of one clan and , of course, changes in our country, our understanding of the need to restore our sovereignty. what exactly is our senatorial commission doing to protect state sovereignty and, uh, preserve this presumption of permissiveness in the united states of america? that is, we

can do it because there we have all these factors together saying that you described it so accurately in general and you know now i’ll do it for you compliment. you not only wrote this accurately. you definitely felt it. i mean, this uh started in america as a pleasant surprise from what conversation, which turned out to be russia then a surprise. well, it kind of grew into the new normal hmm, and they started to relate to it. well, uh, something that america not only welcomes, but can also count on. but then when suddenly russia said first of all, when i talk about the munich speech to putin in 2007, when russia said so it won’t be so. that's when it triggered. well the explosion is not noble indignation of incredible hatred, but i want to ask you a historical question for them. and

yesterday at the forum, president putin mentioned anatoly chubais. although, as i understand it, he now has some other name, yes. at least that's what i understood. uh, the president of russia , that's what we heard. that's what we heard. or moshe of israel too, so i want to ask you. do you agree that the clinton administration not only generally sympathized with yeltsin, but that it was very open and persistent in promoting its favorites in the russian government and these favorites. first of all, there were, of course, kozyrev is far away, they are not a citizen of the united states and a resident of the state of florida, yegor gaidar. and of course, anatoly chubais and what, when uh, and

clinton and his adviser in russia, the chief deputy of the hospital stroptalbat, but talked about the changes that were taking place in to russia they said we support reforms and reformers, and i will tell you that at that time. i didn’t fully understand to what extent this mention of support for reformers, to what extent it was? well, if you want, it’s not rhetorical control or a tribute to these people. and to what extent they were very specifically promoted in the russian political system and made it clear that, in general, if they were not there, it would be more difficult to obtain american loans. you were andranik at that time a member of the presidential council and that’s all. this was observed personally. share what you know. you know, you are absolutely right, dmitry, but actually, this was not hidden. uh, the fact is

that president putin himself, president putin, has repeatedly said that, in general, personnel employees the cia worked for chubais in the ministry where the privatization of property took place, many of them openly. well, i have to say that some prominent western journalists did not mention some names. i was told, first of all , the work was being done to destroy the aviation industry. e electronics. that is, everything that could be modernized over time and russia could be founded could become part of the ranks. in general, the leading industrial powers. well, in the field of high-tech there is not much more. i have to say that valid terms of provision at the imf and

the world bank. uh, the money for the russian government was to preserve the core. this team, over which even yeltsin actually had no rights. even the president did not have these rights. when a conflict occurred later within the framework of the presidential campaign, it was, as it were, or rather, this conflict caused it. e, berezovsky chubais and others. regarding this theft of money , uh, 550,000 dollars and so on, and some actions, which means, uh, korzhakov barsukov and others and the fact that boris nikolaevich kicked out or at least he fired this

group without ceremony, because then the issue was resolved. but actually. which direction will the new government go after 1996, when president yeltsin wins and then it was already decided that he will go further with chubais and others, because the west will not accept these people with these people and therefore other people have other people specifically in uh, well, in general, we were talking about those who, in general, should have done a lot to ensure that they won in 1996. big game on air at the time how the leaders of russia and the korean people's democratic republic negotiated in the far east on the fronts of ukraine there were intense battles and ukrainian attacks took place, terrorist attacks on military and

civilian targets in crimea and i understand, ruslan, that these attacks are basically, at least, in the case of sevastopol, and they were carried out with the help of english storm shadow missiles, let's listen. as a result of the pre-dawn shelling of the sevastopol shipyard , a russian submarine and a military ship. what could be the biggest blow to russian naval installations in the entire war. it was storm shadow, one of the sources told the uk ministry of defense has not yet commented. well there is a lot of evidence that it was storm accounts and uh. tell us about this missile and uh, it was delivered relatively recently to great britain and a similar missile called scalp was delivered to france

. exactly. tell us about this weapon. and uh, to what extent those who have these weapons represent imagine how much they understood that this would inevitably lead to a new round of escalation. if we look at the course of hostilities over the past year and a half, these actions can be divided into two unequal periods - the first 12-11 months. and for the next five or six, initially kiev , for a long time, did not have the perfect, uh , latest generation of high-precision weapons. these were either old soviet developments or something in homeopathic doses, made by the remains of the pathetic remnants of the ukrainian military-industrial complex. and we must give credit to the biden administration. she showed against the background of others. these are the instigators of this fire.

this is significant restraint, who has never shown this reserve in great britain , just as it is now known that in fact boris johnson personally blocked the negotiations in istanbul, so to speak , by forbidding zelensky to sign anything, and britain was the first country that, so to speak, broke this unspoken taboo and delivered a certain number of these high-precision missiles. eh, it’s not the same for ukrainians not only delivered these missiles, but carried out quite expensive and complex work to integrate this western missile under the wing of the soviet su-24 aircraft. this is a complex , difficult topic, and there is one more point that is still a big mystery for rocket experts. uh, storm shadow has, uh, a range, a stated range of up to 500 km. however, as you know, the uk is a member of the international treaty on the non-proliferation of missile technologies, according to which it is impossible to export missiles with a range of, say, more

300. meters, therefore, usually for everyone. eh, so to speak, export passports say 290,280 km, of course, there is no way to check, the appearance of the rocket does not change from this. it depends on the software, so all progressive humanity, including us, are forced to take the british at their word that in fact there is 2080. although i suspect that, most likely, it was transferred. in this, so to speak, in the basic configuration, this rocket can be launch from the depths, without risking that the plane will enter the area where we will shoot down. i i want to ask one simple question again. uh, this is a serious weapon, this is a weapon that is significantly different from what ukraine had until recently, if you have any doubts that london understood that these weapons , these cruise missiles would be used against

territories that not only russia considers our own, but also against crimea which, in general, well, it belongs to russia and is considered part of russia, just like moscow and st. petersburg. dmitry, of course, uh, this regime won’t stop at anything, i’ll tell you more. eh, here’s a famous thinker from the first half of the 20th century. military admiral blows. so he developed the concept of increased use of aviation. yes, including for solving problems not typical for aviation. uh, he had this phrase that all peacetime treaties and all peacetime agreements. like the wind, the fallen leaves will be blown away from the negotiating table, when intensified hostilities begin, so we must be prepared that not only great britain, not only france, but also now, uh, sholsk, it is considered almost the only one who refrains from inciting a conflict, which will ruin both the germans and

apparently the americans, if this is a scam, you know ruslan, that’s what you said, i agree with it. but if you mention this, only you can create the wrong impression that russia will not only have a hard time. but that it will be very difficult for russia to fight back. this, of course, would be fair if russia, uh, stood still, but i’m not afraid to say a miracle happened. military miracle, russian miracle, let's listen to what the new york times writes about this which no one has counted among russia’s friends for a long time. by the end of 2022, military-industrial production in moscow began to gain momentum again russia bypassed us export controls thanks to its intelligence services and the ministry of defense in less than a year after the start of the conflict, russia resumed the import of critical parts

through armenia and turkey american and european regulatory authorities in every possible way they are trying to limit the export of microcircuits to russia. but they are not particularly successful. before the conflict began, russia could produce 100 tanks. per year, and now produces 200 in total, the current volume of ammunition production in russia is seven times higher than the west in europe , they fear that the expansion of missile production will make ukraine especially vulnerable in the coming winter, firstly, it is impressive. and secondly, of course, this explains part of it. why are they in london in new york, yours to some extent in paris and berlin? why are they giving ukraine everything more modern? just because they clearly underestimated russia’s capabilities, what they supplied has not worked so far. but here is my question, which i may have asked several times. is it possible to convince

washington and berlin and london that they are playing a very dangerous game. look, maybe things won't go well. is it possible to stop them by delivering effective strikes on the territory of ukraine or in order to change the dynamics of the conflict it is necessary, if not to carry out attacks on nato countries. but at least to demonstrate that russia is considering such options that you think, you know, it is possible to divide e persons, decision-makers in the west, primarily the united states, are divided into two groups. this those who catch? eh, some cheap hype. and, of course, it’s very fashionable to come to kiev to take a photo with zelensky , write something on twitter, yes. this is the sin of many people, and those who know what blood is

know what the price of human life is. people like general miles these people are in the minority, but they are also a million chairman of the us chief of staff committee , uh, who just recently made another statement that this war will go on for a long time in his opinion, as i predicted that those kilometers, which ukrainians will gnawing them will lead to nothing. and that it will cost many human lives, but this point of view is unpopular because it is extremely difficult to sell. eh, some excited people. it is extremely difficult to explain to your voters that the money was wasted, so it is my deep conviction that, apparently, the fighting will become protracted and our task is simply to bear the blow, as our ancestors held it in forty-one, forty-two, and then the front rolled back. moreover, now if we look at the progress of hostilities. we are still successfully

advancing in these four directions in the kharkov direction. uh, let's go deeper into the territory. we are very well and effectively holding back the ukrainian offensive in the zaporozhye direction. yes , we have problems near artyomovsk under the bakhmut on the left. uh, on the southern flank, they managed to advance, but they are suffering colossal losses and it is already quite obvious that in the remaining 5-6 weeks, and before the weather freezes the actual movement of equipment. work on e is erased from we had to leave the face of the earth to work on another whole number of villages, however, their progress is absolutely, because there is no work, that site is destroyed, that human lives. uh. this is an absolutely priceless thing, unlike, so to speak, equipment that can be

rebuilt. yes, uh people. uh, people, they are very valuable, so our command is not engaged in some kind of ukrainian-style propaganda actions by abandoning people, uh, we are successfully restraining them in the main direction. of course though. uh, some uh, some territories we have to leave the times, and spicy jorli. these territories are, as a rule, not even kilometers, hundreds of meters in fact. absolutely not important. and how many ukrainians will be able to steal territory from us, and those? let's call it acquisitions like this, uh, they are so insignificant that it is impossible even to say so on the map and on television to sell them at the same time that they are huge. uh, losses. uh, in personnel and huge losses, and in technology, recently, uh,

president zelensky was forced to change the heads of all military registration and enlistment offices, because the ukrainian population does not want to fight, there are already open data that, at least before the change of these heads of all military registration and enlistment offices of military commissariats on the territory of ukraine took place, the average bribe amounted to 10,000 us dollars in order to obtain white tickets and the opportunity to leave the country. yes, that’s why we see that ukraine has problems with personnel. and as napoleon said, he laughed in the distance, uh, money. this is nerf or the blood of war, and the new minister made a statement that ukraine does not have enough. eh? at least 40 billion, uh , dollars by the end of the year just to maintain the military budget at the level to pay uh personnel, to purchase uh, in addition to weapons and food , uniforms, so uh, ukraine is in an extremely difficult situation. you have not answered

my question regarding creating a realistic understanding in western capitals that they are not immune. you probably did the right thing. because there are things that military experts can think about, but do not necessarily voice them, as far as he is concerned, i am deeply convinced that those who are in washington, london and especially let's say, and warsaw and bucharest are naive. they think that they have immunity because they are strange to nato that people who think like that and believe that they have the right to permissiveness. these people do not understand russia, not the russian government, not the russian people. we're leaving for advertising, we'll be back in just a few minutes. you will feed american

special schools, the newly appointed minister of defense of ukraine rustem umerov, in the deportation of a child he survived the forces of the circle of russian colonialism. tries to prove with such a defender of rights crimean tatars who are allegedly being oppressed by someone somewhere. the worlds had recruiters.ru in 2018 . he just hammers hard. this is the anti-russian nonsense that the minds of our citizens initially put into it. he is a corrupt official and has a huge amount of incriminating evidence on him, and of a personal nature. and this is where money is stolen. from the same state property fund. by the way, he is a citizen of the netherlands and a citizen of the united states and takes into account all the women, doctors and pharmacists, trade between ukrainians and their owners. we supplied you with military equipment. and you must give us 2 the ministry of internal affairs is what was offensive, the more. he beats the ukrainians on the battlefield, the better his career will be in the future. since the minister of foreign defense of the heir's doll has died, tutti will be

on the first page tomorrow and always on 1tv.ru. register in the app and scroll through kfc and rostix dear. what do you want to hear? yandex.market pick-up points near your house dima is a good person, will you rat me out? in every gum get

new saurs already in pyaterochka for every 600 rubles. collect. put me on if hemorrhoids make you perform acrobatic acts. try the complex drug gepatrombin g. three active ingredients at once. gepatrombin g. relieves pain by two times and is capable of action immediately after using gepatrombin g. treatment of hemorrhoids by one, two, three. how did you go with your friends to a neighboring city over the weekend and off you went, settled in, went for a ride, smiled, and were treated, these are the pies, and how do you go out on weekends to neighboring cities russia.tra travel vtb team with you, an excellent card 10% cashback on everything i wonder, who

invented it? whose family is here? it's about to happen more, which means 10% cashback, it will definitely come in handy, good returns with interest. and the one who invests his son’s future, so the card is free, and transfers without commission, we came up with a vtb debit card for people like you and me. you will have time to get your card for the life of the bank and everything will work out, for example, a dcl tablet for 8,990 rubles. and 30% cashback megamarket feel how beautiful the quality and sophistication are. feel the clarity. feel the high quality. feel it, i say, jeans is the fonbet russian football cup, a large-scale, spectacular real one.

fonbet russian football cup finally found the rarest one. ancient rome china greece egypt the collection is now complete collect a collection of the magnetic sea, travel through the board game and receive a call for a rare magnet magnet. now hit combo for 150 rubles. only at kfc and rostik your friends are our friends. recommend alpha bank and get 1,500 rubles. we will not forget about your friends for every recommendation. they will also receive money. find out how to recommend and earn money on alpha-bank.ru alpha-bank is the best mobile bank on the market from 25 minutes.

on the air of the big game in the united states, the electoral battles are increasingly picking up pace, uh, and let's face it, at least for now they are bloodless, but no less dramatic than what happens on the battlefields, whether military or diplomatic. and here is what president putin said about the prospects for changes in american power and possibly american foreign policy. well , there will be no fundamental changes in the russian direction and in us foreign policy. no matter who is elected president,

true, we hear that trump, uh, says, what will he solve in a few days, he will solve acute problems, including the ukrainian crisis. well , hmm, this cannot but please me. this is good. although he was accused there of having special ties with russia, which is complete nonsense, bullshit, he most of all carried out the sanctions of this relationship by the president with regard to the prosecution of trump. but this, of course, is what is happening for us. well, in today's conditions, in my opinion. this is good because it shows the rottenness of the american political system, which cannot claim to be in order to teach others about democracy, everything that happens with trump is persecution for political reasons of his political, that is, competitor. this is what it is and is done. this is in front of the public eye of the united states and the whole world. they simply

exposed their internal problems and in this sense, if they are trying to fight with us in some way, it’s good, because it shows who is fighting with us , it shows how to speak from soviet times. she said, it means that the bestial appearance of american imperialism grinned, and president putin said that he does not see you in areas of fundamental changes in american foreign policy, regardless of the outcome of the 24 elections. i agree with him, i don’t see such a prospect for fundamental changes, but it’s as if we still live in a world that is not black and white and there are many nuances. they can sometimes matter, but i know that many in moscow andronik believe that there will not even be fundamental changes, because the american deep state will not allow them. your opinion. i think they are

absolutely wrong. i agree that the president says, alas. unfortunately. we cannot yet appoint our own president to the white house. then, yes, then there would really be global changes, but the fact is that the devil is in the details in politics. what are we talking about because today, obviously, in the republican party in the democratic party there is a split between two wings ; one wing says we must continue this liberal interventionist policy to promote human rights. there, all over the world , and so on, the confrontation is intensifying with russia , with china, with all other countries, but there is the other wing, which means the split does not happen because they love or don’t love russia, but what is the other, but someone

else wing the other wing, which says listen, you can’t do it at the same time, it means going to a radical confrontation with russia and china well, please, after trump it says, we won’t be able to cope. confrontation against such two giants, why is rama talking to you, therefore, we need to normalize relations with russia, another thing is that he has his own ideal visions, to convince russia, that it is better to enter into allied relations and move away from china, and then we can resolve our issues against our main enemy, because economically and in all other respects for the future. china, our main rival, is the same, says rande santos, and in this configuration there is no place for ukraine. and for us

, this is a very important factor. if these candidates, who can become presidents , they will say, we’ve had enough of this and ukraine. we closed the topic, we gave them so much, but how long can we keep these parasites and then, by the way, as they said and turkey gabbard, by the way, is the wisest young woman, although she is not yet a presidential candidate. she already said last year at the very beginning of the conflict, don’t do this, don’t give money. don’t give weapons to ukraine, ukraine will never be able to defeat russia. this means that what you are doing is simply helping to kill more ukrainians. this cannot be done. this is a crime primarily against the ukrainian people, that is, there are, uh, two different perspectives. well, there is, of course, a fierce political struggle. and you know

senator. uh, what's trying to do, uh, make trump into these endless lawsuits. i've already stopped counting them. eh, the number of years for which he can be imprisoned, in my opinion, is enough for 10 young people, if they were imprisoned for life. now an investigation into the possibility of biden's impeachment has begun, and not theoretically, but declared by the head of the republicans in the house of representatives, who, according to american law , has the right to begin such proceedings, let's listen. used his official position and his office contacted hunter biden's partners, including borisman's company. in ukraine , the president's family received special services from the administration of members of his family. they would not be able to receive such privileges if they were not relatives of the president. all of this points to a culture

of corruption that has become the subject of a house investigation, so today i am directing our committee to formally begin the process of removing president biden from power. why does this matter? you need to understand what it is. the investigation is still a preliminary investigation, and there is no talk of impeachment, but the problem for this investigation is that during impeachment, when it is announced. and congress has the right to request virtually any documents, and the president cannot invoke his executive privileges, and even the special prosecutor who was investigating cannot refuse to testify. uh, donald trump. impeachment proceedings give congress greater opportunity to assert its prerogatives. here in russia there is such an interesting situation, when i

am dealing with america, both parties are energetically investigating each other. what to do in moscow rather, this is still a matter for the americans. i even read the publications. literally in recent weeks from different countries of the world there has already been such a smell, which means a new civil war. and there are calculations there. i really am not a fan of this theory , i believe that the american state still has a margin of safety, but the fact that many countries around the world are talking about this is, well , quite advanced analysts. it is a fact, as for our country, then, in general, our supreme commander-in-chief president is absolutely right in the sense that ultimately, whoever comes. he will most likely perform this very music. maybe in another arrangement only the nuances are really important, but rely on these nuances. and you probably don’t need to base your tactics and strategy on this, so to speak. that's what's remarkable. in my opinion. so this is the first time, uh, the impeachment process leads directly to the topic

of corruption. there was no such thing as american corruption has become the subject of this level of scrutiny on this issue and there is, of course, uh, peace. can learn a lot. and this will further weaken the position of this current fading hegemon, and besides, i, for example, am most interested in another process. the elections in the united states of america open our eyes and remove certain psychological blinders for a large number of states. it just feels like in negotiations, when you meet people that they couldn't say out loud, let's say, well, i mean different countries, of course different continents, something that they could not hesitate to say, say, 2-3 years ago. today they are discussing openly and they are ready to move on to the formula called a multipolar world. and this, of course, is a huge threat, because while the united states has influence over a significant number of states , it has only one potential. and when this potential goes away, then, uh, if this expression is bobik

died. now, maybe this is also such an interesting situation. uh impression. at least for many republicans. i would told the majority that they want to remove trump from the elections one way or another. some even suspect that they simply want to kill him. let's imagine, let's not imagine murder. let's imagine that he simply will not be given the real opportunity to run for office, either he will have to refuse it, or he will simply be blocked so that he will not have a chance, and andrey is a nickname. russia is regularly criticized by the biden administration regarding the fact that russian elections are very flawed and even that's what they threaten, or at least they advise. uh, many russians, what should we call them, radical emigrants or what term do you have, refugees , there are a lot of terms, but uh, my uh, well, you know,

we’ll be lost sheep, but let’s say this is so delicate the best. eh, these are the lost, although they are all sheep, of course, and not all are lost. e sheep. eh, those who imagine themselves to be wolves, you know, i have another very short term. i call them a herd of trojan horses that galloped off to their feeding trough, so to speak. this is very impressive, but the question is, what will those elections in america be like, oh, which we just what they said, well, obviously unfair, and not in relation to some marginal candidates, but in relation to the former us president who is now even slightly in the lead on issues in the election race, if this happened to you, uh, do you think russia should

would recognize the legitimacy of these elections, russia has every right to make a decision that it considers uh, favorable, in this case because the fact is that something very important is happening today that has never happened in the history of the united states. once i looked at the constitution regarding impeachment , the second one is corruption. that is, if and even with this accusation. democrats will not vote against biden, it will be such a shame in front of the international community. this, by the way, is what our president said, that they will show the whole world what kind of regime they have and what lawlessness and chaos is happening, because you imagine that

the corruption of the president, who enriched himself by selling his influence, will be proven. these people have turned their country into a banana republic and a significant portion of the democrats may risk not voting for removal from power. this means they admit that in america there is no democracy of any kind and they hate their own country and their own political system. let's see what the democrats do. uh, from my point of view, if there is complete and uh, demonstrated lawlessness with the american elections, andronik is right. and russia will have every right to make those decisions that they deem appropriate regarding the recognition of these elections as legitimate. well, i 'll just say one thing.