[000:00:00;00] a disciplined working class, talented people, all this is certainly true, but there are fundamental factors that europe itself refuses, i spoke about sovereignty in my opening remarks, you understand what’s the matter, because sovereignty has multi-vector dimensions, that’s why we we say all the time, and i say all the time, that russia cannot exist as a sovereign state, it will simply cease to exist completely, because it’s not just about issues of military and other security, it’s about other components, so what happened to europe, many european leaders, no matter how they blamed me, did not accuse me of rudely attacking someone or defaming someone,

the europeans themselves. many say that europe has lost sovereignty, say, in the economic locomotive of europe, in a federal republic, but leading politicians have repeatedly emphasized that after 1945 germany was never in the full sense of the word a sovereign state, which is what this leads to in practice , including economic life, they provoked the united states, and i think that i have no doubt that they provoked the ukrainian crisis when they supported the coup in ukraine in 1414, they could not help but understand that this was a red line, we said this a thousand times , no, they climbed, well, we got today’s situation, and i suspect that it is no coincidence that they needed this conflict, the result that

europe, which had long ago lost part, well, not completely, but a significant part of its sovereignty, was forced to immediately stand behind its sovereign and she was forced to follow his policy and switch to a policy of sanctions and restrictions in relations with russia, realizing that this was to her detriment, and now all energy resources, a significant part of them, are purchased from the united states. 30% more expensive, which means they introduced restrictions on russian oil, but what the result is, it’s not as obvious as for gas, but the result is the same, they reduced the number of suppliers, and we, in turn, began to buy a reduced number of suppliers at higher

prices. and we sell our oil to others states at a discount, you know what happened, the competitiveness of the european economy fell down, and the competitiveness of their main, in fact from the point of view of the economic component of the competitors of the united states, increased sharply and other countries, including also increased, with their own hands, as a result of the loss , losing part of their sovereignty, they were forced to make decisions with their own hands to their own detriment, but why do we need such a partner, of course, he is not

useless, but i want to draw attention to the fact that we are leaving the fading european market, increasing our presence in growing markets in other regions of the world, including asia, at the same time, of course, we are connected with europe by numerous, centuries-old ties in the field of culture, education, i repeat, everything it is based on christian culture. but even here the europeans do not make us very happy, they are destroying their roots, based on christian culture, they are simply tearing them out, mercilessly, therefore, we are not going to close anything, neither windows nor

doors, but we are not going to break in there. v europe, if europe doesn’t want this, it wants it, please, we will work together, please, but, well, it seems to me, well... we can talk endlessly, but in my opinion i noted the main points. now, regarding the textbook and the color revolutions of 1956, i will not hide that i did not read the textbook in this part. and regarding the withdrawal of troops, of course, these are also historical facts, then in 1956, many western countries. fueled the problems that were taking place, including the mistakes of the then the hungarian leadership, they trained and trained militants abroad, and transferred them to

hungary , but in my opinion, it’s still difficult to call it some kind of color revolution in its pure form, because there were, of course, an internal basis a serious... like a protest within the country itself, this is, in my opinion, an obvious thing, as far as it goes, and then it is hardly necessary to transfer today's, uh, today's formulations to the middle of the last century. and as for the withdrawal of troops, i am deeply convinced that there is no point in using troops... to suppress internal tendencies in a particular country among the people to achieve those goals that they consider priority for themselves. this applies to

european countries and eastern european countries as well. but there was no point in keeping troops there if, if, if the people of these countries. they didn’t want to see them on their territory, but how it happened, on what conditions it all happened , in what way, this of course raises many questions, but our troops went straight into an open field, how many, how many people know about this, just in an open field, with families, this normal, at the same time, no matter what... the consequences of the withdrawal of these troops were also not formulated by either the soviet or russian leadership, the western partners did not undertake

any obligations at all, but at least returned to the issue of expanding or not expanding nato to the east , yes, everything was promised, our american partners do not deny this verbally. and then we all the time: where is the piece of paper? no piece of paper, that’s it, good-bye, they promised, well, it seems like they promised, but it’s worth nothing, we know that a piece of paper is worth nothing to them, they’ll take any piece of paper we are ready to choose, but at least we fixed something on paper, and during the withdrawal of troops we could coordinate, coordinate issues of ensuring security in europe, achieve some kind of new structure in europe, with the same german social democracy, mr. bar, ego naar, had proposals, i already spoke about this once, to create a new security system in

europe, which would include russia, and the same united states, and the same canada, but not nato, but together with everyone, for eastern and central europe, in my opinion, this would be solved many of today's problems. and then he said, the grandfather was smart, he said exactly what he said, otherwise you will see, everything will be the same, only closer to russia, the german politician, an experienced, competent and intelligent person , no one listened to him, not even the soviet leadership, and even more so in the west and in the united states, well, now we have what he, what he said, you know, so the conclusion. it was pointless to keep the troops, yes, but the conditions for the withdrawal, that’s what we had to talk about for sure, and achieve the creation of a situation that could

would not have led to today's tragedies and to today's crisis, so, well, perhaps that's all, yes, i answered your questions, if i forgot something, please, thank you, since they started talking about germany, that germany. i would like to talk about what you just mentioned, about the special military operation in ukraine, they often say that this is an anti-fascist operation, that it is necessary to liberate the people of ukraine from the nazis, and it is necessary to liberate the country and so on, and against this background it is not entirely it’s clear how this can be, it turns out that we we maintain contacts at a high level, we maintain

contacts between parliaments. we also have parties that are deeply russian in their essence and of course , they have no sympathy for the russian people, they do not understand at all that russia is a multinational country, as was already said in your speech, that’s what i would like to understand, on what you expect, what yours expects. do you understand that anti-fascism in europe also does not support your policies, the european anti-fascist movement does not support the russian one, sorry, please, i would like to ask you, i would like to ask you to specify what you mean when you say pro-fascist forces and pro-fascist parties.

about their attitude towards russia and so on, please, be directly specific, otherwise we will speak in half, or better yet directly, the heads of the tificial official meeting with foreign minister lavrov in 2020, and it was an official meeting, part of it is essentially based on fascist anti-fascists in germany do not quite understand the meaning of such contacts and do not understand the meaning of russian politics in relation to, please excuse me, what do you see, what do you see, this is what confirms what you said , that they are based in their activities on some kind of fascist, pro-fascist, national socialist ideas, that’s it can you tell me specifically

what it's about? for example, he is directly connected with the fascists, he regularly goes to demonstrations in dreston, on the anniversary of the events, and he goes out together with the fascists, this is a representative of the alternative for germany party directly connected with the nazi fascist movement, and this is often talked about, he does not hide the fact that it is a right-wing party. i see, so look, you started with ukraine and asked me. is it fair that we publicly declare that we are striving for denazification of the ukrainian political system? well, we just discussed the situation that developed in the canadian parliament, when the president of ukraine stood and applauded the nazi who killed jews, russian poles, isn’t this a sign that ukraine has developed... a system that

we have the right to call para-nazi, the leader the state stands and applauds a nazi and not just some ideological follower of nazism, but a real nazi, a former ss soldier. isn’t this a sign of the nazification of ukraine, and doesn’t this give us the right to talk about its denazification, but you can answer, yes. this is the head of state, but this is not the whole country, but i’ll tell you, you said about those who go to rallies together with pro-fascist elements, but is this the whole party that goes to these rallies, probably not, that’s all that

we are certainly pro-fascist, pro-nazi is condemned, everything that is devoid of these, well, these signs - on the contrary, is aimed at establishing some kind of contacts; we support , as far as i know, an attempt was made on one of the leaders, and alternatives for germany, a federal republic, are only now during the election campaign , the election campaign, this says something, that representatives of this party use nazi methods, or these nazi methods are used against them, because this is a question that is painstakingly awaiting its solution. investigator, including in your person , in the person of the general public of the federal republic itself, but as for the anti-fascist forces, we have always been with them, we know their position towards russia, we are grateful for this position, and we certainly support it, i

think , that everything that is aimed at reviving, at maintaining relations between us must... be supported, and this certainly can be the light at the end of the tunnel of our current relations. thank you, alexey grevach, right there in the back, thank you for the opportunity to ask a question, he is like that too is of a research nature, we are working on the latest events in the gas sector, here... exactly a year ago, well, a little more, we all witnessed an incredible act, an unprecedented act of international terrorism against critical cross-border european infrastructure, i mean

the explosions of northern threads, and you have commented a lot on this topic, including the monumental negligence of europeans. investigators of political figures in assessing this situation, we can say brilliantly, we see a brilliant absence of any clear reactions of condemnation of this fact on the part of the leadership, for example, chancellor scholz or president macron, although the companies of these countries, one might say, directly suffered from these actions, since they were and are shareholders of these projects, but at the same time, numerous plums who are directly or indirectly trying to assign blame, supposedly the investigation comes to such conclusions that

ukrainian comrades are behind these acts, in this regard , i have two questions for you, the first is whether there was any reaction from these gentlemen political figures of your european counterparts in some direct contacts, and not in official speeches, which were not , in my opinion, or through what is called diplomatic channels, the second question is, what can and will be the consequences if the so -called european investigation , the investigative authorities of european countries will still assign blame for this. for these events, actions on the ukrainian side. the first thing i would like to point out is that long before this explosion, the president of the united states publicly said that

the united states will do everything to ensure that russian energy supplies to europe through these pipeline systems are stopped. and he smiled so meaningfully and said now i won’t say how it will be done, but we will do it, first, second, the destruction of these infrastructure facilities is certainly an act of international terrorism, third: we are not allowed to participate in the investigation, despite our proposals and repeated calls. do it. further, there are no results of investigations, and , apparently, there will not be any. and finally, in the answer to answer the question of who is to blame, you always need to answer the question, who is interested in this?

of course, the american supplier of energy resources to the european market is interested. this no longer has any meaning, but there is another component of this whole problem, of course, if it is ever revealed who did this, it must be brought to justice, this is an act of international terrorism, but one remains, nord stream 2, it is not damaged , it can supply 27.5 billion cubic meters of gas to europe. this is just a decision. government

federal republic of germany, nothing else is needed, today is the decision, tomorrow we turn everything on and the gas is flowing, but they don’t do this, because, as we say, the washington regional committee does not allow it to the detriment of its own interests, we continue supply gas to europe. through turkish flows, and apparently, ukrainian terrorist groups are aimed at causing damage to him, there our ships are guarding, these pipeline systems laid along the bottom of the black sea, but they are trying to attack them constantly, with the help of drones , which are being prepared, including with the direct participation of english -speaking specialists and advisers, we hear this

on the air, where these unmanned semi-propelled boats are being prepared, we hear english speech, this is for us, this is an obvious fact , whoever ends up doing this, well, draw your own conclusions, but they just continue , including through the territory of ukraine, we transit through the territory of ukraine, and we pay money for this transit, so just a minute, here we are a lot, i already talked about this, we hear that we are aggressors, that we are so bad, but the money, apparently, does not smell, the money receives transit, they are happy to cash out all this, um.

and that’s it, that’s why we behave openly, transparently, we are ready to cooperate, but they don’t want to, we don’t need to, we will increase the amount of liquefied natural gas produced and sold, we will, we will, send it to other markets, we will build new pipelines systems, yes, where they want to see our product, where it is absolutely competitive and raises the competitiveness of the economies of those countries, i have already spoken about this, where they receive our products, but as for the investigation , we’ll see, well, in the end, it’s impossible to hide the shitty bags, as our people say, in the end it will still be it’s clear who did this, you yourself mentioned about transit through ukraine, so... part of our public is perplexed, but why are we doing this, this money, so

why are we paying them? we pay money because this is a transit country, and we deliver transit through ukraine, uh, only because we are fulfilling our contractual obligations to our counterparties in europe , well, this strengthens the defense capability of our enemy, well, it also strengthens... our financial condition, we get money for this, of course, thank you, taxane has been a long time coming, thank you, it’s a great honor and a great opportunity to hear your speech, i would like to switch to the middle east, to move away from the topic of the international system of ukraine. from iraq and the prime minister of iraq will soon visit

moscow and i thank you for receiving him personally, now there are numerous problems associated with our country, we have oil growth and gazprom working, they have invested large sums in iraq in kurdistan, in particular, do you think that now there is... a peaceful solution and peaceful resolution of all the problems that currently exist, since there are other countries in the region that would like, for example, on the contrary, they would like to escalate the conflict, they would like to add fuel to the fire, now i would also like to say that by the end of twenty we have already reached the third year and... don’t you think that the time has come to personally help all

the countries in conflict in syria, including talking with the government and with the kurds, with regional forces, all regional parties, to finally put an end to this conflict. thousands of syrians have left their homes, they are being humiliated and a peaceful solution to the conflict is not yet visible on the horizon, and i think that no one except you can do this now, most of the parties to the conflict respect russia, respect president putin, you have very good relations with them, i think the time has already come... you just said that even the parties to the conflict in some states of the middle east, including syria , respect us, treat us with respect, i can tell you, this is because we ourselves treat everyone with respect, and, as far as syria is concerned, we are, we are supporters

of the peace process, including the subgids... the auspices of the united nations, but we cannot replace the contracting parties, we can only create conditions, to a certain extent, if it is acceptable for everyone, to act as guarantors of these agreements, including with the participation of our direct partners in this process, i mean iran and turkey, within the framework of the ostanino process, we did this, all this and... had positive consequences and now everything , what has been achieved, and thank god a lot has been achieved, meaning first of all a ceasefire and conditions have been created for the peace process, all this was done by us, our partners, with the good will, with the good will of

the syrian leadership, but of course, a lot still needs to be done , it seems to me that there is outside interference and... an attempt to create some kind of quasi-state associations on the territory of syria, they do not lead to anything good, and the displacement of arab tribes that traditionally lived in certain territories in order to create these quasi- state entities, this is a difficult story that could lead to a prolongation of the conflict, but we are nevertheless ready to help in every possible way to increase the level of trust, including between the central authorities of syria and the kurds living in the east of the country, this is a complex process , here you know, i try to be very careful, because every word matters, this is the first thing that concerns, the second thing that concerns iraq, we have

very good relations with iraq and we ...' visit of the prime minister of iraq to russia, and indeed there are many issues that are of mutual interest, and of course, first of all, they lie in the energy sector, but there is another very important issue, in the economic sphere - logistics, i now i won't go into details, but we know that there are several options for the development of logistics and transport areas across the territory of iraq, in general, they all suit us, we just need to choose the most optimal, optimal projects, we are ready to take part in their implementation, mr. prime minister will come, and we will be happy to discuss everything on these issues, including those related to regional security and security within iraq itself, we

have maintained the closest, closest and most trusting relations for many, many decades. situation stability and on the basis of this stability the economy and social spheres developed, we are waiting for the arrival of mr. prime minister, i am sure that this visit will be very productive and timely. thank you, taisu kiru, please here. thank you, taiska, japan, last time, i was given the opportunity to ask a question, this is faith, 18, 5 years ago, but after

the start of the war in ukraine, japan participated in negotiations on the conclusion of a peace treaty between the two countries, oh as a result of which japan's russian attitude is stuck stupid i personally - at the time i do not see a good perspective for the situation, however. russia and japan, sased, i believe that it is necessary

to always keep a window, a deologist, to open, in this sense, i believe that for a long time, for a long time, there has been a dialogue between ours. at least traction, that is, at the expert level, uh, well, i believe that japan will come out, if japan comes up with such an initiative, mr. president, does this initiative support, thank you, today window openings are popular, you noticed, oh well , i am a fourth- class carpenter, how to build windows, don’t worry, you know how to expand, we will expand, if necessary, if it suits our national interests, we will work on it, so

, regarding japan, you said that you asked a question in 2018, after the start of hostilities in ukraine, everything changed there, the fighting on ukraine did not begin after 2018, in 2014, but in japan they simply preferred not to notice it, and the more acute phase really began in the twenty -second, but the fighting itself began in the fourteenth, with bombings and attacks, armored vehicles to the donbass, that’s where it all began, i said this when delivering my opening remarks here, in my opening remarks, now about our relations, but, but it wasn’t us who imposed sanctions against japan, it wasn’t us who slammed this window, in this case in asia, japan did this, we didn’t do anything, if you think that

the time has come for some kind of dialogue to take place, and you believe that it is possible that the japanese side will somehow showed some initiative, it’s always good when there is some kind of dialogue, you asked me if we are ready to answer this, are we ready if there is such an initiative on the part of the side that closed these doors or windows, well, if you think it’s time to open this window, then, please, we never said

that we are against, do it, i am a historian from belgrade, serbia , it is a privilege for me to be here, to see you and talk to you, i have a question about your opinion, about the current relations between russia... we serbs and russia, are we the target of western policy, because we stand for christianity. mr. president, i have two books with me that i brought from belgrade for you, please accept them into your library. thank you very much, i will definitely take the books, thank you, and as for whether russia and serbia are a goal for

some circles in the west, well, yes, that’s a fact, but what’s here, no special evidence is needed here, it’s just the fact is why serbia is such a target , i honestly don’t understand, just like russia, in the early nineties, was ready, as it were, to do anything to to build after the collapse of the soviet union, believing that times have changed radically, to make virtually any sacrifice in order to build our relations with western countries, for which we received support for separatism and terrorism in the caucasus, direct, both political and informational, and financial, and even military, well, you just know, at that time i was first the director of the fsb, i looked in surprise at what was happening, i thought, why, we...

it seems like we’re all together now, why are they doing this, but they did it without hesitation, there is no answer, to be honest, even to this day, i believe that this is some kind of, well, just a lack of education, or something, misunderstanding, misunderstanding of trends, misunderstanding of how the world... how russia works, what this can lead to , just a desire to put pressure, force, add pressure, add pressure, nothing but force, because sanctions are also force, only in a different form, a complete desire to search for some kind of compromises, these are these shouts that i spoke about, you must, you are obliged, we warn you, this is also force, well, an attempt to use an element of force, that’s what

the same thing, that's all. this is the relationship between yugoslavia and serbia, first yugoslavia, then serbia, why, serbia also seemed to be ready for everything , wanted to agree on everything, no, we need to add pressure, add pressure, well, i know, i heard it many times, we need to add pressure, this is a weak link, we must add, philosophy, this is such a philosophy, why exactly the serds had to be caught, to be honest? i don’t know, even moreover, when there were some frank conversations, i still had normal relations with some leaders, when they told me, i need to add, i say, why, there is no answer, it’s just that the philosophy has developed this way, this is the paradigm, we need to decide like this, add, but the serbs are not the same people, the history is not the same, the culture

is not the same, you know, i’ll say...' maybe such a difficult thing, it is possible to destroy, it is impossible to crush and subjugate the serbs, they don’t understand this either, but i hope that sooner or later an understanding of this component, of european politics, and in general of world politics will come, will bring understanding, will come the understanding that it’s still more constructive to negotiate, rather than trying to put pressure on people.

thank you for your positive assessment of the role of india, i have a question about group 20. very grateful for your work, in group 20 there is also some reference, one world, one family, one future, which is related to the civilizational approach, as it seems to me, which you are talking about they said, just like russian civilization, you are promoting the approach of russian civilization, and also india describes itself, calls itself a civilizational state, a state of civilization, thus it is necessary to establish a dialogue between civilizations,

and not follow the path of opposition to civilization, which is what was popular, now leaders like you, prime minister modi , are putting forward their initiatives, they will help create a dialogue between civilizations, which can be positive, will help create the principles of international relations that you spoke about, the question is what do you think about the g20 declaration and what is your view on the future of the g20, thank you, first of all i want to confirm what you said in relation to indian civilization, russian civilization, that's what i'm talking about said in his... introductory speech, india russia is certainly the oldest world civilization, powerful, huge, with enormous potential , also a separate civilization, look, we have

over 190 peoples, nationalities, ethnic groups living in russia, more than 270 dialect languages, well of course, isn't this civilization? and india is a multi-religious, multi-ethnic country, huge, we are simply between all civilizations, these are not the only world civilizations, we need to establish a dialogue, a balance of interests and mechanisms for observing this balance, as for the work of the g20, of course, this is a success of the indian leadership and personally, the prime minister... mr. mode , this is a success, and the indian leadership was able to find and achieve this balance, including in

the declarations, closed, some associations, they do not have much prospects, and the balance does not change, well, what seems to me in india is that after all, the prime minister managed to depoliticize the decisions that were made at the twenty, and this is the only correct approach, because the twenty was created once as a platform for discussing economic rather than political issues, and the politicization of the twenty is simply a sure path to its self-destruction. and the indian leadership managed to avoid this and this is certainly a success, but as for the fact that closed , closed some associations are flawed,

it seems to me that this thesis is difficult to refute, because the balance of forces is changing, look, just recently everyone there looked with a shudder, it will also be based on the results of the meeting of the seven, they are going to if only the largest economies in the world, what are they deciding on there now, what consequences will there be for the world economy, well, even before the expansion, before the expansion, the brix was already, the economy of the brix countries accounted for more than 51% of world gdp, respectively, the economy - one, and now, after the admission of additional members of the brix organization, the volume of the economy of the brix member countries became even larger than that of the members of the seven, so

the real balance of power potentials is very important, in this sense, open areas are always better, always more promising, always more valuable, because they create... conditions for finding compromises and mutually acceptable solutions, but if we talk about the results of brix, about the results of the work of the twenty, i want to repeat once again, i would like to end the answer to your question here, this is the unconditional success of the prime minister of fashion, vladimir vladimirovich, but you didn’t go to brix, you didn’t go to twenty either, and don’t you feel a little deprived, that you don’t have the opportunity to go everywhere you want, deprived people? called those who decided to be deprived of some things in the first years of soviet power social payments, so, we don’t need social payments, we are a self-sufficient state and we are going along this path, they also deprived some of their civil rights, well, yes , they deprived them, which means that we are defending our rights

, i’m sure we will ensure them, this is the first thing, second, why should i create any problems for our friends during these events? and you and i are adults, we understand, yes, i arrived, there will be political attacks, which means the show is political, so all this will be aimed at disrupting the events, what for? firstly, we are interested in the brix passing normally, consistent with the results, the twenty passing, at the required level, all this happened, we are quite happy with it, and finally, thirdly, there is enough to do at home, that is. ..' we weren’t offended, well, this is our friend, and he’s at you, well, why, no, we agreed with him, he came to russia twice, we met with him, talked for a long time, there are no problems and i think he spent brix brilliantly and, to be honest,

i didn’t even expect him to be so, so so diplomatic art, because if you followed how the discussion went on, it was not easy to resolve the issue of expanding brix, but he did it, he so politely, tactfully, repeatedly returned to the same topic, and once and twice, and three, finally, consensus was... achieved, this is a positive result, we welcome it , next year you will be in his place, you already know who we will receive, well, next year we will chair brix, and of course , we will strive to take up the baton from south africa, we will be holding a summit with the participation of new members of the organization for the first time, and we have planned 200 events; this year, i’m sure a lot of

positive work will be done to strengthen the organization, which is becoming more and more authoritative, powerful, and this will certainly benefit the members organization, and the entire international community, it originated in russia, brix, let me remind you how it was, at first we proposed to gather the three of us, russia, india, china. and agreed that we would meet on a regular basis, this is how rick russia, india, china arose, then brazil expressed a desire and readiness to join these discussions, brick turned out, and then south africa, south africa turned out to be brix, and now we, we have come to expansion, and expanded the number of members organization, in my opinion, this is very important, it will testify to the growth of authority and desire, that’s what is most important, the desire

to join a format that does not oblige anyone to anything, does not impose anything on anyone, but simply creates conditions for searching for compromises and - resolving those issues that all participating countries are interested in resolving, we are happy about this, we believe that this is a positive process, let's take algeria, algeria? our friend, of course, is a traditional friend, in the arab world, in northern africa, we believe that this would benefit the organization, but we certainly must work through these issues with all our friends within the framework of brix, in contact with the algerian leadership itself, do this calmly, without creating problems for the organization, but only creating

additional ways for overall development. thank you, dayan jeitelek, here, thank you, mr. president, i represent sri lanka , i was the ambassador to the russian federation, the western bloc decided to bombard ukraine with long-range missiles that can reach the territory of the russian federation, and they also wanted to provide f-16. it is obvious that you are now faced with war, with imperialism, a proxy war, and as you already said, there are nazi elements here, from a historical point of view, mr. president, with imperialism fought on the battlefield. these are the chinese communists, the communists in north korea and vietnam, they defeated

the united states. as for imperialism, lenin criticized it most of all. the question is: in the face of this challenge, this threat, from these forces? perhaps it's time. reassess 1917, because the chinese, vietnamese and north koreans were the children of that year, don't you think it's time to reconsider the events of those years, as well as the us relationship with its allies, and france and also with

china. take the microphone, please look after what? and who needs to reconsider, you have such a complex question, starting from 1917, if i perhaps understood correctly, a colleague asks whether it’s time to reconsider towards a more positive attitude towards the revolution, the communists and that period of our history, reconsider precisely the attitude towards the period of our history, our history of 1917 and so on, i’m sorry that i’m interpreting, but that’s how i understood it, but why should you interpret when there is an author of this question, but let me explain, briefly, what i’m talking about,

since we are under attack from imperialism and elements of fascism, since in history there have already been cases of successful victory in china in korea, in vietnam, victory over imperialism and lenin wrote texts about imperialism, perhaps the time has come to criticize the events of 1917 less and restore the historical status of those events, and like the french revolution, the american and chinese revolutions, well, criticize less the events of those years, including in russia itself, as i understand it, yes, you are right, right in the sense that you need to do less criticism, and more to engage in such a deep, in this case even scientific analysis, of the realities that happened at that time, that are happening now, uh, yes, you

are right, uh, the only thing that needs to be given is such deep assessments. including assessments related to ideologization, now i will speak my own opinion, my own opinion, everyone present here can argue with him, it is necessary to give correct assessments of ideologization, interstate relations and geopolitical interests, in addition to relations between classes, relations within the framework of the so-called class struggle, but we did not attach importance, and even after the events of 1991, after the collapse of the soviet union, we were still in the paradigm of class relations, ideological relations, and did not notice that

there are purely geopolitical interests , here are the relations with the people's republic of china , the west, there was a moment when they tried and , not unsuccessfully, to play off china and the soviet union, and russia, because china was the weakest, it’s not scary, now that china has begun to grow, it is under the leadership of the same communist party and today the chairman, its power is increasing, almost every day, well, that’s it... now there is a return to, then, when they tried to use it in china, then they forgot about all the ideological differences, and now again they are being revived, but in essence, at the core, at the core of us policy, in relations with china

, fears of a geopolitical nature, the power, the growing power of china, that's what... frightens, and not that there are any human rights there the rights of national minorities are violated, does this really bother anyone, no, this just a tool to fight china, that’s all, the same with regard to russia, in general , globally, well, yes, you need to give such general - general, deeper assessments, and in any case, i agree with you. in that it is indiscriminate, throwing everything into the dustbin of history, everything that happened under the leadership of the communist parties of that time , which you said, of course, indiscriminately tarring it all with the same brush, it is inappropriate and even, even harmful, in this sense i

i agree with you, well, since we started talking about china, mr. liugang, 我来自中国的 新华社研究院。在本次代联会上有专门讨论金 专机制的论谈,给人以起发。美西方全面升级对额制裁以后 ,全球南 方国家提出拒绝与西方起舞,表现出战略自主。在 8月举行的经专封会上, 有六个国家加入了金 专合作机质。您认 ?

,俄罗斯在应对美西方 持续的制裁方面将会 at the valdai club meetings we talked about brix, and this is very important, we also saw that after the us and some western countries escalated sanctions against russia, the global south did not follow suit, and showed strategic independence during the brix summit in august this year, six countries became new members of the brix, and the global south entered a new level of its history of cooperation. china and russia are important developing countries and what can our countries do to expand. and what needs to be done in the face of new sanctions from the united states and some western countries, what else

can russia do to cope with this challenge? thank you. already today, cooperation between russia and the people's republic of china, is undoubtedly a very important factor stabilizing international life. this is the first. second, for this. if this influence, this influence were to grow, first of all, we need to pay attention to maintaining the pace of our economic growth, i already said, this year in russia, in russia, economic growth, i don’t remember whether i said it or not, but i spoke about in some aspects, if i said it, then... but economic growth this year will be somewhere around 2.8, and maybe 3%, closer to three, i say this very carefully,

but closer to 3%, and for our economy , for the economic structure that russia has, this is a good result , we have completely overcome the decline of last year, we are picking up the pace, and in china, growth, as far as i know, will already be 6.4%, this is a very good indicator, no matter what anyone says regarding the slowdown and growth of the chinese economy, all this is chatter and idle, idle talk, because china ensures these high rates, in fact it is one of the leading locomotives of the world economy, too... it happens in india, there is

even more growth there 7.6%, in my opinion, therefore, these are the countries of the global south, they are gaining momentum, our task is to ensure this leadership, this is the first, second in the field of security, we see what is happening in europe, we see that one of the ways to provoke and create a crisis in ukraine was an irrepressible desire , western countries, primarily the united states, are expanding nato to the borders of the russian federation, but they are doing the same thing in the east, creating various closed military groups; they are stepping on the same rake there that they were advancing in europe. therefore we it is important to respond to this in a timely manner, we will expand our, our interaction in the field of security, while we are not creating... any blocs against anyone, but we are forced to react to what is happening

around our states, and finally , we will certainly implement those plans for infrastructural development that are related to the construction of greater eurasia, the eurasian economic union and the plans of our chinese friends for development, the idea of ​​​​pretending one train, one track, i’ve already talked about this i said, i think that this is very promising, but finally, we have a lot of cooperation planned in the humanitarian spheres, in the field of student exchanges, sports, this is extremely important for the neighboring states, and we are implementing quite large infrastructure projects already in a bilateral plan and we will do this what to do next, i hope we will discuss all this in the near future during our meeting with the chairman as part of the furum that

the chairman is holding. so mikhail rostovsky, vladimir vladimirovich, introduction ukraine in nato is categorically unacceptable for russia, but as far as i remember your last speech regarding ukraine’s accession to the european union, you were much less negative, has your point of view changed over the past year. will russia object to ukraine's accession to the european union? do you think such accession is possible in principle? we have never objected or expressed any negative position regarding plans for ukraine's accession to the european economic community, never that

as for nato, yes, we have always been against it, and this position has certain serious grounds, since the expansion of nato to our borders directly threatens our security, this is a serious challenge for the security of the russian federation, this is not only a political bloc, this is a military-political bloc and the approach of infrastructure poses a serious threat to us, but as for - as for the economic interaction of any country, economic unions, we do not see any military threat for ourselves, therefore we do not we consider ourselves to have the right to even discuss this topic, this is a matter for ukraine itself and european states. at one time, president yanukovych , by the way, without renouncing the association with the european union, said that we just need to further study these issues,

because he believes that the condition agreement in creating this association with the european union, it poses certain serious threats to the ukrainian economy, in fact, if you read what was written there, he was absolutely right, there is the opening of borders, the creation of absolutely unacceptable conditions for functioning, the ukrainian economy, the ukrainian real sector, well, the goods are european. the opening of the ukrainian market for these goods was extremely destructive for the real sector of the economy of ukraine itself. being drawn into the energy structures of the european union also deprived ukraine of certain advantages. therefore, if you analyze just simply analyze objectively. yanukovych was right; they used this as a pretext

for a coup. some kind of nonsense, i just don’t know, just an excuse, i don’t know, a crime, the present, here, but today this is no longer relevant, because by and large , the ukrainian economy cannot exist without external support, today everything is different, today look, everything is balanced there in general externally, and the budget is balanced in ukraine, macroeconomic indicators of more than... monthly multi-billion dollar outflows, about 4-5 billion monthly through various channels, these are loans, all sorts of grants and so on, come to ukraine, as soon as this is stopped, that’s it, in a week everything will fall , all, the same goes for the defense system, well , imagine, supplies will stop

tomorrow, you’ll only have a week left to live. when the ammunition runs out, yes, they will run out in the west, i already said, the usa produces 1400 155-caliber shells, and the ukrainian troops burn up to 500 per day, and there they produce 14 per month, well, you know what we’re talking about, but they are trying to increase production there to 75 by the end of next year, but we still have to live until the end of next year. approximately the same situation, they themselves say, they said that we supplied everything, all the armored vehicles, ammunition, we did everything for ukraine. they themselves said, i didn’t come up with this, they publicly stated, we did everything for this , now it’s up to ukraine, let them counter-offensive, and then behind the scenes they add at any cost, believe me, i know what

i’m talking about, so they do it they are trying to do this at any cost, but it’s worth it, this is the question of the demilitarization of ukraine, it is now trying to produce something else, but already... it turns out that even these unmanned vehicles, both aircraft and those that move across the sea, everything happens with with the help of western advisers and intermediaries, we are ready, the european union is ready to accept such an economy into its membership, the flag is in hand forward, but in order to maintain the viability of... which has already decreased from 31 or from the beginning of the post-soviet period there from 41 million to 19 with maybe that

no longer, but still 19 million need to be fed, this is not an easy task, european countries are ready to take such an economy , well, let them take it, we were never against it before this crisis and now we are not against it, but i have already said what is happening in the very inside itself, european economy, well, it would be very noble of them to take also the economy of ukraine in its current state , there are also certain funds there, certain procedures for leveling, equalizing, the level of economic development, well, i don’t know, even how much, right now a colleague from hungary spoke about how much hungary is now receiving from these of these funds, well, it will not receive anything, of course, because everything will go to ukraine, and nothing will be enough, no one will

receive anything, no one, that means, if the level the level of well-being has decreased by 1.5% over the last couple of years there, then it will fall altogether... not only to zero, it goes into the negative, however, i don’t want to be ironic, i don’t want to force anything, it’s just the reality , but , but if this happens, we do not consider ourselves to have the right to somehow counteract this or even speak negatively on this matter, vladimovich, is there really a line left between nato and the eu, these are in the same countries, well, i i think that, after all, the eu is not a military bloc, and why transfer all this to the eu platform, if there is nato, as you said, these are the same countries, they, within the framework of this

organization, make appropriate decisions, nato in fact is, first of all, an instrument of us foreign policy, so they provoked the conflict to the acute phase in ukraine . united their allies and satellites around themselves, in fact, demanded that they take measures in the fight against russia, they took these measures, and the united states immediately took advantage of this situation in the economic sphere. they imposed their energy resources, dear ones, and hosted decisions related to their increased attractiveness, many industrial enterprises in europe and germany

decide to move to the usa. here is the end result of this whole chain. well, if, as i know for sure, many people in europe don’t like this, they still see it and understand it. but they can’t do anything, and today’s european elites , apparently, are not ready to fight for their interests, they simply cannot, they are not ready, the dependence is very large in the economic sphere, partly they can even understand this, so i’m sure gradually everything will level out, the same states, in my opinion, are making a colossal strategic mistake, simply colossal, as i said in public. of various kinds, so they put pressure on their allies, and then questions arise like from a colleague from germany, so the afd raises the city, an alternative for germany, so of course, raise it, because no one from the ruling class is fighting for the interests

of germany, that’s why this is happening, it’s not clear to you, or something, it’s an obvious thing, so, well, let’s see how this situation will be they want to develop, the ukrainians want to join the eu, let them join, the europeans are ready to accept them, let them accept them, the day before yesterday was just the day of german unity. i read in some newspaper that there was a big problem, gerhard schröder came to the event, all the current politicians were solving the problem of how not to end up next to him, because he is your friend. you still have friends in germany, by the way, you know, the point is not whether i still have friends in germany, although i have friends there, and their number is growing, it won’t seem strange, at the expense of those

stefan is talking about, no? no matter, first of all at the expense of those who pursue the interests of their own people and do not want to serve the interests of others, as for schröder , germany should be proud of people like him, he is a true son of his people, he thinks first of all about the interests of the german people, i assure you, with every decision and always, he first of all took the corner, when discussing any issue that... we discussed with her, he raised questions about the interests of the german economy and the german state, and what is happening today? it was he and i who built nord stream 1 and almost started nord stream 2, we started doing it with him, we blew up these infrastructure systems, and where is the economy of germany now, where is it, so these are those who... from him

they are trying to settle away, they would think about what he did for the interests of his people and what they are doing today, there is no result, so - rakhim and shakbaev, yeah, and good evening, here, excuse me, what surprises me, to be honest with you i’ll say, i’m surprised that such people, such politicians still exist in europe? that they have survived at all is surprising, i am telling you this sincerely, because the generation of people who are able to defend national interests, in my opinion, simply self-destructed, disappeared somewhere, good evening, there were a lot of people here at the club discussions, and which stated the imperfection and injustice of the structure of the world monetary and economic system, world finance, world economy, and the great

hopes of many experts, but could you to share your vision of the desired, most importantly, possible structure of the global monetary economic system and what discussions are taking place within the brix regarding a single currency, thank you, well, as for the global financial system, it is of course not ideal, balanced and responsive, meeting the interests of the overwhelming most participants in international communication, well, look, i already spoke about this, i will repeat it again, at the russia-africa summit, colleagues said that our african friends mentioned that the credit burden

african states have over a trillion dollars, so that it seems impossible to pay off these debts, it will simply never be done , well, what is this, what kind of system of international financial relations is this that gave rise to such a state, this is some kind of indemnity, this not loans, this already goes beyond normal economic and financial relations, the modern financial system, it gave birth to such a state, brought it to this state, therefore... then he jokingly, jokingly said that only cowards pay debts, but but this, but he also warned that this is a joke, here, but, but this is not normal when such a situation is created, and of course, he has to change something, this bartenwood system, she, she once

was created on the basis of the dollar and so on. further, but, but all this is gradually collapsing, collapsing, because a currency is a derivative of, uh, the power of the country’s economy, which... imitates this currency, the share, share, of the american economy in world gdp remains the same, this is also an obvious thing, these are statistical data, share of countries brix, i also talked about this, it is based on purchasing power parity, in relation to the share of the seven countries. increases increases, especially after the admission of new members to the organization, this is a serious significance, the difference is already quite serious, yes, the economy of the united states, the eurozone, it is based on modern technologies, which means per capita income is much higher

than in developing economies, but what a trend, there everything goes into negative territory in recession, but in the brix countries, this is such growth, even after blows to the russian economy, and apparently they were calculated on the fact that the country would simply fall apart, the economy would fall apart, and the country, russia would fall apart, we not only overcame all the difficulties of last year, but also came away with a positive outcome, with 3% economic growth, which means unemployment. .. 3%, debts are being reduced, which means we have significantly reduced our external debt , all our companies are servicing all their debt obligations, yes, we have problems, we see them, non-return of revenue,

there is, uh, a weakening , currency, national, we see it, and central bank, and the government is reacting to this, i am sure that the steps are correct, and there will be good results, but as for brix , we now need to create not a single currency, we need to establish a settlement system, create financial logistics, so that ensure settlements between our states. switch to settlements in national currencies, while understanding what is happening with our national currencies, the macroeconomic indicators of our economies, keep in mind, therefore, exchange rate differences, which means inflationary processes,

it’s a difficult situation, but it can be solved, we need to work on it, so we discussed it with experts yesterday. including the possibility of creating a single brix currency, well, theoretically, yes, it’s probably possible , but in order to ever approach this, we need to achieve a certain parity in the development of the economies of our countries, well, this is a very long-term prospect, in at one time, as my colleagues told me, the eurozone moved to the euro, to a single currency, with different levels of economic development. and problems arose. why should we step on the same rake? this is just such an issue that is not even on

the agenda, but of course we must and will work to improve the entire system, financial and global finance and financial relations within the framework of brix . we’ve already been working for 3 hours, you’re not tired of us yet, well, how can i say that, i see, the correct answer, well, for now it’s time to finish this little by little, okay, we’ll finish soon, so, mrs. degol, mr. president, i’m pirde gol, i a true friend of your country, just like my family, and i stand for friendship between russia and france, more and more people in france and in europe share the same points of view, friendship and

partnership between russia and france was one of the pillars of my grandfather’s policy, i want to restore this. france is based on fundamental values, eg family, patriotism. and spiritual responsibility, this is what is now disappearing in the western world , it seems to me that these fundamental values ​​are very important for creating peace and for mutual understanding between peoples, so it seems to me that the conflict in ukraine is an ideological conflict, it is even a conflict civilization, because on the one hand, there is the western world, which... its soul, which exchanged everything for the ego, for momentary

pleasure, history has shown us that civilization cannot live like that, on the other hand, there is a multipolar world, subhygides of russia , china, india, african countries, arab countries, these people, these peoples. ready to fight for their traditional values , fundamental values, for me, mr. president, this is an ideological conflict, which is why i believe that it will continue and expand, what do you think? firstly, i want to say that it is a great honor for us to welcome the grandson of general degole to russia.

somehow the current president and i touched upon some issues in passing, and i said, i can repeat myself here, there is no secret, i don’t want to give any historical assessments, everything was very difficult, but for us in russia, uh, despite the difference in military rank , the hero is not the marshal, but general de gaulle, because he personified france and its desire for freedom, for independence, for dignity, and the heroes, the pilots of the normandy neman squadron, yes, today the situation is different; today france faces completely different people, and it’s not a matter of age, but of views. on the role, on the significance of france, on perhaps even on its history, on its