[000:00:00;00] chinsky, then we’ll ask him, you haven’t seen the speedo, but no, how should he do it, marchuk, even if you’re lazy about article 144, you should know the secret theft of other people’s property, i’d at least ask, are you without dreams, right away in bull, what are you talking about, by the way, genka gave me the receiver, cska played with spartak, we won. horseradish there 2:1 spartak, he put drozdovoy in the top nine for the last minutes, well, at the same time he studied your gavriks, what kind of gavriks, enemy voices, it’s like you were conducting the leshchinsky case, why did you conduct it, that’s something we lead and will lead, well, well, successful business trips to paris, you and i will, or what, whose cow is lowing, they just announced that lishchinsky is flying to paris,

this one, what’s his name, will meet him at the ramp? pistols, but then all sorts of nonsense, like the fact that he chose freedom and so on, motherfucker by the leg , duty officer, no sleep, cars at the entrance, urgently, by the end, maybe we’ll still have time, motherfucker, come on, push, push, you you see that today there is only one airflot to paris, but it seems, like grandma’s. the goats are in the garden, so why be in such a hurry, the border guards know, know what, zuev, first and last names, they don’t have a photograph, but calm down, he might look under the name of ivan ivanov, someone, let’s

go. to the criminal investigation department, what's the matter, comrade may, the person who is under subscription, neva in the case of murder, will now go on honor

back, back, back, samsonov, detain him, calmly, calmly, comrade, comrade, let him go, this is the lieutenant, criminal investigation, let's figure it out, do you have any papers to detain a criminal, no, okay, okay, let's go, you tell us everything in detail, the plane will fly away, dunces, just don’t be nervous, just let’s go, and who are you, actually, employees, it’s clear , don’t, don’t, i’m going myself, don’t, put your hands away, yes, the volunteer arrived at the request of his heart, there’s already one and a half here i’ve been here for a year, i don’t want to change and leave, because my team is having a hard time without me, here’s the dugout, the ground, the steps , wow, a washing machine, and this is the steam room, yes, yes,

yes, yes, oh, guys, we are ready to destroy the enemy so much , how long will he come here for the premiere, special report, not a step back, on air a big game, rarely do different visions of the international situation collide to such an extent as now, when we look at how the crisis between israel and

palestine is approached, gas and, if i can say more specifically, how different leaders approach it, let’s first listen to the position of president putin and president erdogan, the need for an immediate ceasefire by both sides and the resumption of the negotiation process. it was emphasized that a long-term peaceful settlement of the middle east crisis is possible solely on the basis of a two-state formula approved by the un security council providing for the creation of an independent palestinian state within the 1967 borders with its capital in east jerusalem. that is, in other words, without in any way rejecting all unacceptability. the action of hamas, and when it comes to a long-term settlement, the leaders of russia and turkey focus on the palestinian problem, without the resolution of which they consider

it impossible to stabilize the situation in this region. here's what the us president says biden: the department of defense has deployed a carrier strike group, expanded its fighter presence in the eastern mediterranean, and we stand ready to bring in additional forces as needed. let me say again, any country, any organization, anyone who is thinking of taking advantage of this situation, don’t do it, well, first of all, what struck me was not even their complete support for israel without any reservations, but just not can they refrain from making threats? well, they can’t, and russia hasn’t done anything, why would they blame russia? they managed to accuse iran of not doing anything, jake salevan, biden 's national security assistant said that they have no

evidence that iran was somehow involved in this operation, but they are already making threats, and for their threats to be, well, let's put it this way , more persuasive, one carrier group is not enough, from my point of view, careful, measured leaders, especially when you say, you remember, senators, that in the 506. soviet crisis, president eisenhower not only did not want the united states to intervene, he demanded from great britain, france, israel, yes, it’s absolutely right that they stop their military operations, and i

don’t really imagine, against whom they are going to use two aircraft carrier groups, with hundreds of cruise missiles, by the way, against hamas, i don’t know. but nevertheless, here are two world visions, two very clearly formulated positions , what to do next, you were, among other things, the representative of russia in the un, you are now the deputy chairman of the federation council committee on international affairs, as they say, you have the cards hands, it seems to me that the situation is very alarming, you you know, it seems so to everyone, except the un, i was also ambassador to egypt for two years, that was 20-odd years ago, now is that period, with all its difficulties, then the second intifada began, there were problems,

but i remember it as some kind of, you know, easy warm-up against the background of what is happening now, and now of course, believe me, and excuse me for such simple words, but the feeling does not leave me. while no one sees a real logical way out of the situation that has developed today, a way out in such a strategic plan, our leader and those who agree with him, his interlocutors of recent days, suggest that we must return to the basics, we must return to those agreements that were the basis of the formula for resolving the middle east conflict, they were constantly violated , they were sometimes retreated from under the guise of such very good arguments, as was the case with the recent so-called auromic agreements during the trump presidency, but as we see,

all this failed, everything failed, but here what to do today is, of course, a big question, but in any case , what not to do, this is more like some tangible reality, well, in particular, one, and then... a second aircraft carrier in the mediterranean sea, you know, this reminds me of the image from the russian proverb about the elephant in the china shop, in this small seaside one. two aircraft carrier groups, why, for what? well, yes, biden, in his own manner , once again shook his finger, saying that i do not advise anyone to take advantage of this situation, who is trying to take advantage of it, not with a finger, with two aircraft carrier groups, but who is he threatening, who is he threatening, us? well, this looks extremely strange to the arabs , well, it is even more illogical as a form of support for israel, but in my opinion this also will not work, in a word, it only adds

uncertainty and complexity to all middle eastern situations. that's what i would say. karanchikh nazarov, an outstanding film director and a person very familiar with the international situation, i’m not afraid to say, a historian with an encyclopedic knowledge of what is happening in various... regions world, but now i want to ask you specifically as a film director, well, look, there were absolutely terrible, ugly pictures of what terrorists did to civilians, residents of israel, not only to civilians, but especially to civilians, since it was covered in russia, they are trying in some places, for example, the new york times, to create the impression that russia. did not express its concern and indignation at what

was happening, but i don’t know, on this program, we were extremely frank and extremely specific about this, and did not from my point of view, it was impossible to be indignant, but then this indignation, which was for the benefit of israel, here, of course, such a tragic situation, what to say... what is beneficial, what is not, in general, it’s even somehow inconvenient, but you want to get at least some benefit from any crisis. israel received great support in the overwhelming majority of states in the world, in public opinion, and after this israel declares that they will stop at nothing,

including large sacrifices from non-peaceful population, new pictures appear, but only of what is happening not in israel, on the territory of gaza, and these pictures are also frightening, especially if you think not about the reaction, even in the west, but about the reaction of the arab street, then i can imagine , like hamas, which in general just seemed to have done something outrageously dangerous , but they are already starting to look like victims, and what is the united states doing, instead of saying, like the european union, which said that they support israel , but we must take into account the norms of international law, no, the united states, in the person of president biden and his assistants, are beating themselves into groups, declaring that the united states is categorically, completely on the side of israel,

not just on the side of israel, as they say, they will show everyone who can have an active different point of view. , what do you think this all means, what could this lead to, in terms of stability in the middle east, or lack thereof? this will definitely not lead to stability, this is absolutely obvious, but here one cannot... disagree with our president when he yesterday, i think, he said that this is a complete failure of the united states in the middle east, and this is obvious, in principle, after the ninety -first year, after the soviet union left, as it were, from the political arena, including from the near east, the united states was in complete control, they became the master of the world in general, including the middle east, well... this is the result, one might say, the middle

east, this is the leadership of the united states, did not bring anything good, and the most important thing is that in my opinion it is impossible to decide this issue, the most complex issue indeed, has such prehistory, without the participation of other large states, and russia and i think, and turkey, iran, but it is impossible to resolve this issue, because in this issue we really need to find some kind of fair solution, which on the one hand will give the palestinians the opportunity to exist, to really create their own state , on the other hand, to guarantee the security of israel, this is also important, because without this there will also be no peace, but this is impossible, the americans cannot to do this today, it seems to me that this is precisely

the reason why they are constantly trying to pretend that they are, as it were , threatening everyone, etc., etc., regarding the terrorist attack? well, i think it’s obvious that this must be condemned unconditionally, all this horror that was happening there, this, this is unacceptable, not in relation to civilians, nor by the way, the military, so to speak, it is clear that war is a terrible thing , but still, there must still be some measure, a measure in all these matters, perhaps, how is terror different? from legal, even the most brutal military operations, terrorism is distinguished by the fact that they strike indiscriminately, and not only, and not only do they not try to save the lives of civilians, but in general, they believe that strikes on

civilians are, are part, the legal part, of the operation, let's see what the israeli minister of defense, general galland, said about his plans in relation to gaza. i have lifted all restrictions, we have resumed control of the territory and are moving on to a full-scale offensive. hamas wanted change in the gaza strip and it will change to 180° compared to what the terrorists thought. they will regret this moment, the gas will never return to what it was before, it will take weeks or months. who would n't come to behead? basically, now, in my opinion, in this situation, israel and

netanyakh are in a rather difficult situation, on the one hand, of course, all these horrors that we saw at the beginning of this war, but on the other hand, you can imagine, what will happen in the gas if an operation begins there, this is a densely populated city, it is clear that there are all sorts of things underneath it shelter, it’s all already clear that underneath it , as they say, it’s full of civilians, it will simply turn into some kind of armageddon, in which case the informational pictures from there will begin to obscure. as they say, here are the first, first frames, so i looked at pictures of how the israelis were destroying, destroying buildings, buildings of peaceful houses, yes, and you know, it was reminiscent of pictures from soviet films about stalingrad, this is what it looked like, absolutely, and when

jews start behaving like nazis, at least when it starts to look like they are behaving yourself in this way, the security of israel is not a way by the way, i do not rule out that there is some kind of plan in this in general, i do not rule out that there is some kind of plan, to draw, to draw into gaza, the military units of the israelis, i think, not tanyahu, as a very experienced leader , he most likely understands this, so you see, he still seems to have this feeling, he doesn’t know how to approach this, because i also drew attention... with what cruelty these crimes were actually committed by hamas in the early days, how as if to deliberately provoke him to be some kind of very strong, very emotional blow, against this background, if israel sends large troops there, it starts there, then

stalingrad, but only 2 million civilians, this will, of course, be a false moment, in this sense, a rather difficult situation, and for netanyahu, in my opinion, senator, so i will suggest what richard nixon would have done together with henry kissinger, if there had been a similar situation, he, of course, would have brought some appropriate american armed forces, combat readiness, it’s probably him i would have made it quieter, with a weapon, well i probably would have done this, because this is how great powers behave when they have the appropriate capabilities, after that i think that either myself..." i called the president of iran, or asked kissinger to call or even meet with the iranian

foreign minister affairs, i would say that this is an absolutely terrible situation, this is an absolutely unacceptable situation, that the united states has begun a new dialogue with iran, that the united states welcomes iran's new dialogue with moderate arab states, first of all, saudi... therefore it is very important that the united states, iran, in this situation , if they were not partners, then at least there would not be a clash, so that they would not turn out to be adversaries, which no one needs, that’s what i have dreams of dreams, or is this really how diplomacy used to work, well, that’s how it worked before, i would like to hope it will work in the future, it’s completely vague, the hope is that maybe now it will work this way, because this is a continuation of that

thoughts expressed by karen georgievich, without major powers cannot be avoided, but what we see so far, so far we see quite active work, by the way, to say, our president, minister of foreign affairs, we had a dialogue with turkey, with iran, with iraq , probably the main topic of discussion was precisely the crisis around , around gas, and what are they doing... our, well, let’s say, opponents on the other side, now there’s a new term, former partners, let’s say, former, let’s say, let’s say, former partners, but let’s say, the same european union, it’s basically given a different kind spells, blaming one side, rightly accusing, absolutely right, because this terrorism is some kind of monstrous violence that is intolerable, but you can’t see it like that. as exclusively black and white, not because it is good or bad, but because it leads nowhere. vladislav shrygin,

a famous military expert, tell us what you imagine an israeli military operation against gaza might look like. i would like to start by sending those same two aircraft carriers, because this decision from a military point of view is absolutely situational and in no way is connected at all... with any military component, because even two aircraft carriers against iran are generally nothing, it is quite obvious that this is just an action of the biden team, which is trying to switch the agenda from the inconvenient agenda that is in the ukrainian direction to a new one a victorious agenda that america is strong again, again it is sending forces to where it can solve everything, it is obvious that the team has no real plan now... there is no, so in this case we of course must focus but what is happening now

in israel, what can it do? one must understand that, of course, now israel is hesitating, hesitating for several reasons, from a military point of view, it needs to clearly gather all its forces, and most importantly, create a real plan that one way or another it can carry out, quite obviously and not at all i doubt that the israeli general staff understands perfectly well that, as the minister of defense promises, rolling all the gas into asphalt will not work under any circumstances, it can be cut, it is possible, why not will it work? because, firstly, this will require a huge amount of time, and secondly, they are aware that the military potential of hamas has not been undermined even by 10%, because this is what karen georgivich said, underground gases, this huge, not only the city, these are huge warehouses, this is a huge system that allows you to sit under any bombs, they have now brought the army to more than 300,000 people, well , in this case they certainly have huge

advantages, but they understand very well, that battles in city blocks, especially in destroyed city blocks, in fact, not only do they nullify technical superiority in many ways, but they also add to this and of course, as you yourself just said, within a week of such battles the whole world will switch completely to the other side, because the destruction of an urban agglomeration of two million... this is all monstrous, what the terrorists are doing is monstrous, this is clear to everyone, and never a single cruelty , never a single atrocity justifies the atrocity of the other side, this axiom of war, in this case, of course, for israel the task is practically impossible, in my opinion, since it so happened that i saw israel’s last war around 2006 in lebanon, because i was in lebanon, then, strangely enough, they sounded verbatim the same words, it’s just that many of us quickly forget them, they promised to wipe lebanon off the face of the earth and hezbollah was supposed to be destroyed in 48 hours, but 21 days of fighting showed that absolutely nothing happened, and this

means that now we have to put those tasks on which... well, in this case i’m talking about the military man is cynical: revenge will be taken, at least it can be presented to society, but israel will not be drawn into a dilemma, the outcome of which will be completely incomprehensible, because you can fight for a very long time with huge losses, but i repeat, the problem will not be solved , everyone understands this, that from a certain moment israel will be under such pressure, even from its former allies, that it will be forced to repeat the situation that we saw with you in 1982, when a brilliantly carried out operation to... encircle beiruto ended with the fact that after 2 months of isolation of the city of a million, under pressure from the world community, it was necessary to release the oob together with yasser arafat from beirut, it was the same similar situation, now almost the same thing is happening with gas, so you need to understand that of course, the ground operation will begin , but i don’t see the possibility , i say again, for israel to resolve, as they

say, the issue once and for all, i saw how israel carried out... based in lebanon in 1982 , when general sharon went straight to beirut, although he only had permission to go 40 km, to the border to the litani river , but he said that he had problems with the brakes on the tanks, yes, a well-known joke, a well-known one, yes, but to what you said, first, of course, the israelis, although they hated polo. and the ppo committed terrorist attacks on israeli territory, and the israeli ambassador in london had just been killed, but nevertheless, even sharon gave instructions that there would be no atrocities against civilians, and president reagan, when he sent american troops,

his initial goal was clear and humane, to help. evacuate plo from lebanon. he did not say, israel is our ally, they just killed the israeli ambassador, they killed israeli diplomats, in this regard, israel is a victim of aggression and therefore they can do absolutely anything. no, the position was completely different, that israel has the right to self-defense, but you need to know where to stop. and also vladislav, when the israelis did not make sure that their charges, the phallangists, the christian police, that they behaved minimally decently, they engaged in atrocities against the palestinians, then there was outrage not only in the arab world, but in israel, the victorious

sharun had to resign. is this how the world has really changed? i’ll tell you honestly, it’s uncomfortable for me in front of myself and in front of the audience , that we, at least i, will read all the time, oh, oh, how it was, how it all changed, how it all went in the wrong direction, it could be statement of fact, but this is definitely not the answer to what to do, therefore, since... we are a person who sees the big picture and can think in pictures, tell me at least what direction to go in this situation, well, of course, it’s very difficult to give a recipe here, firstly, i can reassure you, the world has always been like this, this is for us at one moment or another it seems that there was something different there, everything is always the

same, unfortunately, wars, violence. as they say, the interests of the big players, and the same thing here, by the way, some questions still remain, how did hamas manage to carry out this action, how did this happen? perhaps, and how to explain this, this is also a question, but i think that the only way , the one you talked about and the one that is west and connected... the whole point is that the world has already become multipolar, nothing to do with it you can't help it, but for them to admit it is to admit defeat, but it is impossible to solve this middle eastern knot, israel, this arab conflict, without the participation of

not even just large ones, there is russia, the usa, china, but here it is necessary. we need iran, and turkey, and the saudis, that is, as if it should, should there must be some kind of collective decision, only in this way can this issue be resolved, because... the essence is to give palestine, yes, as its own state, but on the other hand , i repeat, i understand the situation of israel, israel does not trust, israel does not trust if it gives a state, and what about its security, but on the other hand guarantee israel's security, and it can only be guaranteed by a number of countries, and not just the united states, with the participation of large arab states, including, yes, of course, well, that's just one thing, but today all of this in the hands of the united states and the west, and for them this is a defeat, because this is an admission that they, they are no longer leaders, they, they are fighting in ukraine because of this, we go out for

advertising, we will be back in just a few minutes, i will ask you, senator, taking into account your very extensive diplomatic experience, tell me what, from your point of view , russia should do, in the current... very difficult circumstances, we are going out to advertise, what do you think about our joining nato? america, the usa, is actually built like a mafia state, whoever is stronger is right. i i think it's just a misunderstanding. i never could have imagined that this elderly norwegian herring had such a wry sense of humor. and we are happy to contribute as long as it is needed. for what? nato needs a war, there is an elite that derives personal benefit from this, okay, glory to vavan and lexus, connect them already, i’m connecting them. so, vavan and lexus, well , it was much more interesting for him to communicate with us than with

zelensky. glory to russia. the vavan and lexus show, premiere, today on the first. yak montechoca, product of stellar group, alina, and where is figure skating, without fail, at the first, we are starting, the best skaters of the country at the start of the dream tournament, grand pri russia, live broadcasts, on the weekend at the first. there is a big game on the air, we know the positions of russia and turkey, i have the impression that

china has a position close to them, and many moderate arab states, starting with egypt and saudi arabia, who also say that the decision cannot be pure military that it is necessary to pay attention to... the origins of this problem, that is, to the status palestinians, but more specifically, this is what you think russia can do , given such a militant assertiveness, i ’m not afraid to say such a pseudo-moral reaction from washington, well, what should we do in the current stalemate, stalemate in the worst sense of the word, i i would say, to a certain extent, hopeless, probably only god knows, and the president of russia, no , knows, and doesn’t tell anyone about it , that’s the trouble, as for the president of russia, he

really, very weightily and quite definitely, without any there on the one hand, on the other hand, he expressed our, as i already said, strategic assessment of the current situation, in which direction we need to move in order to, in principle, find a solution to the conflict, but what to do right now, this is of course a very difficult question, maybe , maybe, in this case, i am speaking, well, exclusively, so to speak, on my own behalf, it is necessary to somehow mobilize the opinion of the surrounding countries, the persons involved are israel and palestine, but in this case part of palestine is in gaza, in order somehow, coherently convince: both on the other hand, uh, well, a little, a little, let's say, uh, weaken the swing, because what's happening now, hamas says that our goals have been achieved, we are ready for

negotiations, but this is a hypocritical position, this is rhetoric, moreover harmful rhetoric, which feels like they just want to provoke, uh, public opinion, to start making claims against israel. but it’s also hard to make moral claims against israel, because what we saw is, in principle, not amenable to any, well it’s not that i understand that this shouldn’t have happened, but it did, and israel felt it , the people of israel felt it themselves. russia has a certain advantage, having constructive, good or bad, friendly or not, let’s not give these assessments of constructive relations with israel, both with the leadership of israel, and with arab partners, probably, this resource needs to be used somehow. vladislav, this is very difficult. the problem, it seems to me, is for

russia and in general for everyone who wants, on the one hand, to punish and disarm hamas, on the other hand on the other hand, to preserve your human face. i will say that i myself have two divergent reactions here. on the one hand, when i hear the israelis say this, they can ban the supply of electricity, gas, food. of all this in the gas, my reaction, i will try to imagine, the soviet army is advancing on berlin, someone would say, and you must provide them during the operation, all these things, all these things, which, of course, are very important for normal people, but on the other hand, they hampered the soviet military operation, but i don’t think i

i don’t think that not only stalin, but also many of his marshals would have understood such an approach , on the other hand, again returning to history, when information was received that some soviet soldiers were showing cruelty towards the german population, you know, this probably better than me, marshal rokosotsky, the front commander, gave the order to stop immediately. if necessary , do not stop before execution, i want to remind you that this was during the operation against berlin, the war was ending, these were victorious soviet troops, heroes, here rakosovsky gave such an order, and i would be surprised if it was unknown and approved by the supreme commander, marshal stalin, how can we find some kind

of correct... approach, what is acceptable and what is unacceptable for israel in such a situation? well, you know, if we take the very small opportunities that exist now, it seems to me that russia is now trying to use them as much as possible, but firstly, we see, from the first days when all this began, i said that the main key point of befurcation , this will be the south of lebanon, that is if... it stops, if hezbollah doesn’t move, then this will largely simplify the situation , well, at least it will simplify it for one player, but we understand very well that iran is behind hezbollah, and this means that working with iran all these days , was certainly carried out, and we perfectly understand the contact between the russian leadership and the iranian leadership, that is, at least, there is already one of the counterbalances in this situation, it allows one way or another, well, at least to demonstrate

to israel that its actions , at least, have a certain assessment have a certain, well, how to say, a step forward, that is, a second front is not opening, of course, in this case, of course, a lot will depend and really still on the world community, because i don’t have the feeling again the fact that israeli generals are people who have lost their heads, they always sat there , thinking very coldly and very clearly calculating their steps. people with very extensive military experience, unlike the minister of defense, who can still say everything, whatever he wants, he is the minister of defense, these people operate with completely different concepts, they understand perfectly well that a situation in which everything is possible and there are no checks, it always has a rebound, because in this case those against whom you are conducting an operation , they understand that they have nothing to lose, and the battles become absolutely fierce, so i personally have the feeling that

israel, one way or another, is looking for a certain limit on the use of force. another thing is that now he urgently needs that for his own people show that he will punish those who committed these crimes, but it is unlikely that the people gave him a mandate to fight endlessly and to fight, as they say, to the last drop of blood, so here, of course, the second thing is to really work on everything... lines that surround israel, there is egypt, there is jordan, again, we see the position of syria , in this case, of course, we have the opportunity to somehow use our contacts, albeit completely minimal, but with the west, because our the position we we mean, it is heard in the west in any case, and of course, there is direct communication with israel itself, i think that in the end , in this case, contacts between our president and the prime minister of israel are also

a very important line, in which, at least at least, we can voice our position, because there is no military solution to bringing in some new forces, or even more so thinking about what american aircraft carriers will do, no, i repeat, for me this is... that america has no real plan way out of this situation, the only plan it's called to show that we have muscles, but it's called, suddenly something happens, and we take out a gun, so what? well, karen, indeed, what was just said by vladislav, this is very important, when you talk about leadership, you must be able to lead people and the state behind you, i don’t see such an attempt now... on the part of the united states , i see threats again, as you think, this is this line, it will scare someone, it will help create an effective coalition against hamas and against those who would you like to support it, or does it just

undermine american leadership in practice? it seems to me that they are undermining, it seems to me that they are undermining, i think that by the way, such a speech by hamas is also in some way a sign that this leadership has been lost, this also does not happen by accident, it is clear that israel is, in general, the closest an ally of the united states, it is clear that the united states strongly supports israel, israel has, in general, enormous influence within the united states, thanks to its jewish community. who really with his energy, with his talent he has done a lot for the americans, in general for the construction of modern america, he has the right, of course, to demand from the united states some kind of reciprocal steps, which in general is happening, but there is

a feeling that, as they say, akelo missed the mark, because what we see, well, where 30 years ago, the united states, iraq, the war in afghanistan, but this is a little further, so to speak, this, now we see a war, and the most serious events in israel, well, strictly speaking, the public in such cases he says, guys, if you can’t cope, let’s kind of join the general queue, let’s get together. deal with what is happening, in my opinion, this is obvious. well, what the united states has achieved in the middle east can be characterized by the saying, what they fought for, they ran into. the prime minister of iraq

is in moscow at this moment, conducting very constructive and friendly negotiations with president putin, and the main thing he says is that. it is impossible to resolve this crisis without serious attention to the palestinian problem. we're leaving for advertising, we'll be back in just a few minutes.

my name is polina vorobyova and i am an actress. wow, i decided to find out what companies we have in our country, what they produce, what inspires them, what they strive for. the big premiere is our everything, see you at the channel one station on saturday. good response, excellent command of german. i was born

in the ural derek. now every day i will kill a colonel, and it seems to me that i am very eager to add. eliminating koch is great. value, is it worth risking such a valuable agent to eliminate koch? based on real events, a real intelligence officer must be ready for anything on the razor's edge , the premiere of a serial film, soon on the first one, he is the enemy, you fell in love with him like a cat, you're having fun, right? we're planning an adventure here, right? history, what do you like? i love italy, i love architecture,

may the magical power of comfort come with us. let's paint this space, immerse it in the atmosphere of italy, this dress is straight, taffeta, this is all very heavy. to name furniture is, first of all, an emotion, it is a soul, it's energy. well, the surprise was clearly a success, the premiere about comfort was on saturday, on the first. the big game is on the air, senator, we talked about a moral country.

we talked about the military country of affairs, i want to ask you about the dilemma that now faces russian diplomacy, but the fact that the united states is behaving in some way seems obvious to me, but here are two countries with which russia has important relations, one country is naturally israel, not a friend, not an ally, but in general still a partner. of course, she, this country refused to join, despite american pressure, to anti-russian sanctions, well, there are many people living there in israel who came from russia, who even have russian citizenship, and who, unlike recent political fugitives from russia, do not succumb to russophobia, in general- then occupy in relations with russia. quite a friendly position, and i probably wouldn’t

want to push them away either. on the other hand, there is iran, which is becoming an increasingly important partner of russia , both economically and militarily, but politically, russia doesn’t have many such reliable, willing partners among... developing countries like iran, also when such threats are made against iran, threats from washington, from israel, in general , i probably don’t want to push iran away somehow either. to do in this situation, well, what do you mean you don’t want to, it’s not just that you don’t want to, it’s unacceptable, in any case, uh, in fact, one of these manuals, or something, of american foreign policy is... attempts to drive a wedge between those

countries , which, well, may vary degree, but is viewed as hostile towards the united states of america, therefore, of course, such attempts will be made, we must be prepared for this, as for israel, here, well, as they say, there simply cannot be two opinions, we must the first to condemn, and in the harshest way to condemn barbaric acts of violence, bearing in mind: that these are also our people, who have family, any kind of connections with us, and even if they do not have these connections, even if they are not citizens russia or in the past citizens of the soviet union, these are still close , close people to us, this is a fact, and but only on this can we build a policy, we can build humanitarian programs, we have to weigh it on the scales, well, what do you call all the alignments, as for: iran, then iran , this, this is not something like it

could have been imagined during the famous revolution of 79. this is the mature political leadership of a fairly independent and responsible country that is capable of taking constructive steps if it is confident in their correctness and compliance interests of iran itself, we need to work in this direction, this is exactly what i was talking about, we need to somehow bring positions closer together, free all parties from extremes, this is what needs to be done now, this is probably the main task. it seems doable to me; to be honest, something else just hasn’t occurred to me yet. senator, thank you, and i think that this is really very good advice, the best that is really possible. oh, i want to ask you, vladislav, about the military situation, and not the gases in the area, but the threats

that are being made against iran. uh, iran, in general, it supports russia in the war in ukraine, iran systematically supports russia in the united nations, should moscow say something about the inadmissibility of any military aggression against iran or would it be an escalation of the situation? i think that such a statement is absolutely legitimate and legitimate, because we really are in partnership relations with iran, and partnership relations presuppose an open identification of our own position; from a military point of view, we understand perfectly well that now, at least the united states is definitely not ready for a war with iran, i’m talking about this again about the situational nature of that group, which now you say is not ready, not in political or military terms, i say, but in military terms, that is, it

’s quite obvious, that, as i say again, those forces that are in this region, they cannot even... approximately threaten iran, this is just, well, what is called a demonstration of force or a demonstration of the flag, respectively, in this case all these threats, i think it's also more for the internal agenda, in general i say again, i have a complete feeling , very sad, that what the biden administration is doing now is not work on the external circuit, when responsible people work as if in a difficult situation, but this is work before just their own public, working for future elections, working to make an impression on the inside, while they didn’t even approach any external contour, so i rather view threats against iran as some kind of routine attempt to catch a certain political hype, because they do not pose a real military threat now, but what about the possibility of an israeli strike on iran, say, to end the iranian

nuclear program, again not in the current situation, now israel is forced... to focus on gas, this is the main thing problem, this again requires enormous resources, israel understands very well that these resources may not be enough, especially for a long war, we remember how over the last 5 months, america slowly drained the supply of artillery shells that were in israel and which were promised to israel in case of something, as their own arsenals, but they were eventually taken to ukraine, and israel understands that, again, its resources are for such two wars. it’s simply not enough, so i think that israel, in my opinion, is also generally trying not to provoke hezbollah, lebanon, or especially iran, everything goes on at the level of routine accusations, routine statements and such a general, how can i say, political balancing act, karan, the situation is of course

very complicated, and it seems to me that it may go to in a variety of directions, absolutely, i want to ask you not even at the level of analysis, because... it’s very difficult now, too much can change, so to speak, based on your informed and erudite intuition, it seems to you that this crisis new in the middle east, that it will at least somehow help russia by distracting the collective west from ukraine, or the opposite, more realistic, when two crises overlap each other and, in general, the situation can become explosive, well , you are absolutely right that maybe both, with on the one hand, i admit that to a certain extent this may, as they say, divert the attention of the west and the united states from the ukrainian issue, especially if israel

becomes involved in a long-term war in gas, and this may be, in this case, as they say, everything all resources will be directed to supporting israel, i think that ukraine could suffer greatly, and even more so, we don’t know until the end, but we see everything. the message that weapons from ukraine came to the gas, this is also serious in general, if this happens serious confirmation, this is generally a serious blow to polensky in ukraine, but on the other hand, of course, the situation is still very dangerous if it develops into the worst, and it can develop, even despite the fact that the united states is not ready for war with iran, how is it? you know, no one was ready for the first world war, but it happened , and if it goes blow after blow, it , of course, can really lead to

completely unpredictable consequences in the general world, it can blow up the whole world, it seems to me that in this situation, on the one hand, you need to be extremely careful, and you correctly recalled the lessons of the beginning of the first world war, which no one wanted. but they took steps that made this war more and more likely, but on the other hand, of course , russia is a permanent member of the security council, russia is a great power, russia has a presence in the middle east, i proceed from the fact that russian policy, in this case that she will be careful, balanced, but active with an element, if you like, of play on ahead of the curve, it was a great game, we'll see you

on the air tomorrow. nato is moving ever closer to russia's borders, despite verbal assurances that the alliance will not expand to the east. unfortunately, there are no verbal promises. deliveries of abrams tanks to kiev and promises to supply longer-range missiles only proved that the alliance is close to open conflict with russia. what the west is seeking, a protracted war or the opportunity to sit down at the negotiating table, and what european politicians say about nato expansion in private conversations, we’ll talk about this today in the show vavana and lekf.

our guests today are experts, journalist, war correspondent, thomas roeper , political scientist, americanist, malik dudakov, writer, blogger and member of the public chamber, dmitry puchkov, deputy chairman of the state duma committee on economic policy, mikhail delyagin. hello friends, let's get started. recently , nato secretary general en stoltenberg came to kiev and promised military assistance in the amount of 2.5 billion euros. however, stolteng's position has changed frequently over the years. we had a conversation with him in 2017, we called on behalf of the then president of ukraine petro poroshenko, this is what jens stolteng told us then: american partners told me that our country could receive nato membership within two years, isn’t it true? this? i think this is just a misunderstanding, ukraine must first be