and - there is no one hundred percent security , therefore, when protecting neighbors, sometimes it is also necessary to use physical effort, a woman in these conditions always loses, simply because she was not created for any physical effort. atuyara, the main character of the film, did not die. and in georgia 200 he has extremely nice characters from the south-east in kochigar, the main character, as well as in the failed film... in which all the heroes died in a car accident, current asia, south-west and caucasus, he was quite fierce, for which he actively criticized and was persecuted by the domestic liberal intelligentsia, and the world community, the cinema community, simply did not take his films into competition, and here there was even some paradox, because not a single picture of the man who held the palm of national cinema... championship within the country

participated in competitions at international festivals class a, aa in cannes, any next film by balabanov was sure to be shown in information screenings, but he was never taken into competition in his life, simply fearing that suddenly someone else would like this movie the jury, the filmmakers can expect everything, they will accept and give the victory to balabanov, to allow... from the point of view of western cinematography was completely impossible, there was very little money, practically none, on film on camera, but i shot in all places, where i know something, a very unusual character, and then we sat on the beach in a cafe, drinking beer, i think, i don’t remember, it was during the day, i

told him, let’s make a movie together, but there’s no money it will be, he somehow simply said, come on, that’s it, i didn’t take him as an artist, but a person who, well, together with me, i wasn’t a director yet, so big then , although i was already there... had directed professional ones before, i mean, but i didn’t feel like that, and i was probably just a babble. he didn’t give a damn about it, eh, he stuck to his line, as it was sung in the song in the film brother-2, and i suggest you watch a fragment from brother, quite suitable for this line, come home with us, it’s good there ? i’ll do it, but what are you doing here?

i like it here, america has all the power of the world, where is the power, brother, that’s what, all the power is in money, brother, money rules the world and the one who has more of it is stronger, well, okay, here ’s a lot of money, and you’ll do something, i’ll buy everyone, including me, danil was a man who could actually make a goat's horn, his front-line past was clearly visible in him, every time he rented an apartment, he examined and figured out escape routes, back doors, and so on; upon arriving in st. petersburg, he did not immediately go to his brother and maybe even himself could not explain why, he spends the first night somewhere or on in the attic, or in the basement, among garbage bags, but he comes to his brother already armed, which also doesn’t matter... perhaps he wanted

to feel the revolver in his pocket, this is very serious and says a lot about people, while they talked about brother danila , he did everything great, professional, it is deeply paradoxical and symptomatic that a wonderful biography of alexei ktebrinovich was written by a lady who is the main lobbyist for domestic feminism. at least among film critics, maria yuryevna kuvshinova. marrusya this way stepped on the throat of her atlantic song, although she acted in a purely american style, she did not express her thoughts about certain paintings, but chose approximately 20 people who knew balabanov best, including people from his circle

and people... slightly from the outside, able to appreciate it from some neighboring territories, it warms me that i was included in this number, and maria herself spent hours... these people with a voice recorder, about alexey himself, about how he understood the life around him, the result was a rather voluminous picture, which, in general, was recognized by the entire russian public, the book went through several reprints, it completely corresponds to the task, but the truth is that masha, it seems, felt that she was too led by the character and began to publish her texts about what in particular, as it seems to her, the main character of the film brother is not brother danil himself, but a german, as in general, a person, a bearer of a moral imperative, who utters the most accurate and important maxims on this

subject, to this i will say that with that same success we can say that the main character of the book about baratina is a cricket, he is also a bearer of a moral imperative, he already says the right things, but still, frankly speaking, the main character is the acting hero, the wooden man buratina, ah, brother, and he himself was in some way a wooden man, he could protect himself completely, but frankly speaking, only a solitary person is completely invulnerable, people who fall into the same orbit with him find themselves under... threat, as for sveta’s friend, then fully understanding the abomination of his own brother-in-law, he calls him from her apartment, and thus sets her up, because brother vitya immediately writes down the number, and

then leads all the gang on him, and in the same way takes a very big risk in the thieves’ apartment... by chance there wandering director stepan, to whom danila says that of course i don’t really like the director, but you’re a normal guy, no one will touch you here, i promise you, after which he completely irresponsibly leaves to watch butusov, and if he hadn’t returned and delayed at least minute, then, of course, stepan was also threatened with immediate death, and another thing is that all this was redeemed by the absolutely excellent... charismatic smile of sergei bodrov jr., everyone was in love with him, at that moment the gangster theme was absolutely dominant in cinema, all films the best films about bandits were on b. brat, boomer and brigada. following the time without

a state, there came a time of relative stability and tranquility, a certain abundance unexpected for our population. expressed this period in my opinion, zhorok ryzhovnikov, here, of course , there is no consensus decision on this person, but i continue to insist that he is the best exponent of this period, as for modern times, the director who will express it most accurately... that this is still the number one director, the main director of national cinema, this is not always the person who collects the biggest box office, it is almost never a person recognized

by national intellectual circles, the main director, the number one director, this a person who most accurately and vividly conveys the state of the national mentality in a specific period of time, as for our national cinema , in the first 30 years of soviet power, the main director of the country was josepharenovich stalin, it is unlikely that there was someone who was able to bend his line, or rather there was such a person, his name was sergei mikhailovichenstein, imagine, the fact is that esenstein considered himself... absolutely equal to stalin, he felt incredible respect for people capable of turning the world upside down, he considered himself the same himself, and was not at all afraid of either arrests or any stalinist influence, and only with such a mentality was it possible to do what

he ultimately did, that is, he reflected some movement, some change in mass... creativity after all there was some archaism to it. sergei mikhailovichko understood that it was not my cinematography that achieved the greatest emotional effect, with its hyperbolism, with its emphasis on both the camera and some excessive acting, as soon as sound came to cinema, immediately all emotionality began to wane, misenstein tried how he could extend

the period of nimvo cinema in mexico, where sound cinema , of course, was bad due to technological backwardness, and then alexander nevsky made a not very successful film, full of some kind of excessive pathos finally, on ivan the terrible, he realized how to return, not my cinema, he moved on to truly operatic aesthetics. majestic scenery, music by his constant colleague the great sergei sergeevich prokofiev, constant dancing in the frame, or negotiations, so demonic stern recitative in the style of classical opera, they were able to once again return spectacular emotionality, since isenstein, although no one else could, when he died, instead of..." the main national director remained vacant for quite a long time, primarily because

the country changed the system in some way, moved from bolshevik absolutism, with stalin and khrushchev in the center, to still the collegial brezhnev leadership, the system changed slightly, people expressed this, not everyone was ready, there is a feeling that in 11 years during the khrushchev reign, any serious and accurate exponent of the life around him did not appear, but he appeared exactly after the borezhnev coup in sixty -four, in the sixty-fifth year leonid gaidai’s film operations and other adventures of shurik was released, the fact is that it was at this moment in soviet russia , the middle class began to take shape with its very specific urban approach to the realities of life and its affairs semyon semyonovich gorbunkov

, on the other hand, shurik was the first student in many years on the big screen nikita sergeevich students for 11 years, not a single picture was produced in which the student was positive. moreover, he not only crammed lectures and answered evidence of evidence, but behaved like a full-fledged romantic hero, fought on balalaikas with shpana, then fought with her on rapiers , then wrapped lumpina in wallpaper and carried out educational work with him, and this clearly produced an indelible impression of the most beautiful girls in moscow and the moscow region of the near transcaucasia. it's still a podcast. with fire and me, hosted by denis gorelov, with a story about the most important events

national cinema of the past 30 years, about the leading trends, the development of national cinema and where it will move in the very near future. as for the senior economist of geproryba, semyon semyonovichaunkov, he was a bearer of deeply traditional values ​​and resisted in every possible way the various temptations that the foreign world offered. where he traveled on the steamboat mikhail svetlov, and uh, the bearers of the ideology of this world, gesha and lyolik, semyon semyonovich stood firm, rejected both gold and diamonds and a robe on mother-of-pearl buttons, and even in general, at critical moments, he said, i would like a beer, if i went out drinking, i would always sing the russian national anthem, a song about hares, these were the main people of the emerging new world, another thing is that in

in the seventies, gaidai’s filmography really deteriorated, perhaps not through his fault, the fact is that reality deteriorated, within the new middle class there appeared its own rather specific layer of swindlers, money-grubbers, and gaidai simply could not help but notice it, with one on the one hand, because he was quite a self-aware, understanding artist, on the other hand, because he himself loved money very much , he didn’t hide it, there are 12 chairs in the film, all the characters were swindlers, there can be no pozashchenko in the film, all the heroes were swindlers, and even in the film incognito from st. petersburg according to the auditor, also all the characters were swindlers, even in ivan vasilyevich changes his profession, the weight of the swindlers was such that it is quite difficult to say who is the main character in the film, and ivan vasilyevich appears quite rarely, but at

the end of it taken away in a straitjacket, that concerns shurik, who appears there under the name of engineer timofey. and transporting ivan vasilyevich to the manager bunsha back and forth in the middle ages and back, he clearly loses the site, the surrounding baggage, and even his wife, the beautiful girl lida, leaves him for yakin, and therefore truly bright people, zhullik miloslavsky, zhullik appears there sword, what a petty rogue director yakin. this is a rather frank and correct reflection of the surrounding reality, it just so happened that even in sportto 82, in the film that was the last gaidai's box-office success, the swindlers played by pugovkin and kakshenov outright outplayed the bright, beautiful positive hero played by algis arlauskas, not

because orlaovska is a worse artist, because in life the swindlers won, this, in fact, was the end of soviet aesthetics and soviet life. it got to the point that at the same time as balabanov, almost the same year as his brother, a wonderful picture by maxim pezhimsky, mama negoryuy, came out, where the myth of such a bandit cross was actually worked out. both corrupt police officers and bandits searched from different sides. vulnerable, some mythical creature named sailor, every time they practically grabbed his tailbone, uh, some grace found them, they let him go, like a real, real christ, our jesus iosifovich, because they felt that he walks the right road , and even if he goes on a long journey, he always

remembers that his homeland is waiting, in the whole world there is no place dearer to us than our homeland, sung just during the credits, in in fact, somehow only representatives of gangster groups could preserve their property and self-respect; many decent directors rose to the occasion , and around the time of his brother, a year after his release, the country experienced a default, and the ruble, of course, fell to television simply did not have the money to purchase foreign series, at that very moment the formation of the national series business began, and producer kopitsa released the first season in 1999 - streets of broken lanterns and the first homeland security agent season. unfortunately, then the series deteriorated, because, uh, some

kind of law enforcement pathos had already become applicable to it, and somewhere in the fifth... in the sixth season , it became completely impossible to watch all this, first the main directors dropped out of the series, then died himself accumulating in 2004, if my memory serves me right, then in the end, all the main characters began to drop out one by one, in general, by the sixth season , there was practically nothing left from the streets of broken lamps that was in the first and current viewers it’s quite difficult to explain what... the picture produced at the time of its release in ninety- nine. this is still the podcast burn with fire and i, its host denis gorelov, with a story about the most important events of national film production and national film distribution over the past 30 years, about the main trends in the development of national cinema and how it will develop in the very near

future. the country has already changed. some circumstances did not correspond to balabanov’s main message of resistance to the surrounding world. of course he still the inertia of the audience's perception of the filmmakers' understanding of the surrounding world is quite large. balabanov remained in charge until his death. he is there, go my star is always with me 2013 in my opinion , but at that moment it was already quite obvious that a new time had come, a time of abundance that suddenly fell on one’s head, a time when there was quite predictable

stability around , etc. and here the director novy was already needed, he actually appeared in 2013, the first film directed by andrey was released pershina, sadly, the name of pershina is unknown to absolutely no one in the country, because he shot all his... films under the rollicking pseudonym zhorora gooseberry. these were igorka, igorka two, and ice 2, and the best day and the series “call dicaprio.” and in times of stability, people most often begin to engage in their personal lives, mostly the pictures were concentrated around personal internal relationships in families. and it is not at all surprising that in almost all of the listed films the wife played, kryzhovnikov’s then wife, yulia alexandrova, his then muse.

the heroes of the films were, in general, quite strange, it cannot be said that in the films of the kryzhovnikov there is at least one positive character, on the other hand, it is impossible to call all of them at least somewhat unconditionally negative, these are people who can hit you in the head with a bottle... let, on the other hand, pull you out from under the fire and become your best friend, in general , our compatriots around him, and a very accurate look, perhaps, with the most sympathy , he treated his wife and his characters, but when his wife in the film the best day i took a tire iron and tore up a police car, it became clear that this was, of course, a real storm in the desert and we also needed to keep a safe distance from it, as in general with all of us, while, mm, to be honest, uh- uh, all the problems

that happen miraculously in the pictures are still corrected, and sometimes even in a truly magical way. remember how in the film irony of fate at one time everything developed for a moscow doctor and a st. petersburg teacher not quite in the right direction when they had already started dancing among themselves, things were openly heading towards sex and it was absolutely clear that if something happened between them, then this couple would not have any continuation, the whole thing was saved by a drunken hippolyte, who kicked the door for a long time, shouting that he warmed up, robbed, and exactly the same thing always happens in all of kryzhovnikov’s films: something unexpectedly beautiful, magical, which corrects all the misunderstandings, uh, returns all the characters to the correct orbit.

let's kiss now and jump. no, well, it will be ours ceremony, come on. bark look at him, uh, tarantina, come on jump, come on, dear quentin, they ruined everything again, you idiots, well done, come on, come on!

kryzhovnikov is a deeply uplifting author, and i think that is why such... formal recognition by the film critical community did not happen to him. our intelligentsia loves to whine more than anything in the world, and if you look at the list of 50 of the most important films chosen by critics - the last twenty-fifth anniversary, you will understand that after each of these films you want to hang yourself, there is not a single film by kryzhovnikov among them, another thing is that i already had the opportunity... to make sure that this person, the most accurate, exponent of stable times, quite a lot of people agree with me, in south

sakhalinsk, some viewers actually told me , that kryzhovnikov and balabanov are incomparable, but the times of abundance of money that fell on one’s head are also incomparable with the dashing nineties, in fact, kryzhovnikov’s heroes are dunces who, as a result of suddenly appearing prosperity, are tempted to become euro dummies, but stick to their own... of the traditionalist view remain themselves, and now there is a new stage, the stage of unconditional and frank confrontation, and the people who will best express this period are still in the shadows, i can’t say who it will be, at the moment , uh, a whole group has emerged

- such new wild directors, and this... and kiril sokolov, who shot the wonderful films dad, tear it off and throw it away, about a real bloody civil war within families, which still ends well, this is pyotr dikarev with the film guyler with zakhar prilepin in starring, this is the romance of the zhigals with the film forest, this is roman mikhailov with a tale for old men, nikolai rybnikov's film chicago seems to be moving in the same direction, this is such a wild russia, solving its problems, sometimes even at the cost of prison and scrip, but still not deviating from the set course, there is no doubt about it that a new director will appear, perhaps not tomorrow or

the day after tomorrow, sometimes. inertia requires a wait somewhere between three and four years, but he will definitely be there, in valery todorovsky’s time, when he had just turned 30, they asked why there were no new torkovskys in the country , he said: “no, that means there is no need, as soon as there is a request for a new torkovsky, the new torkovsky will immediately appear in orbit, just like there is a request for ... "there is a spokesman for confrontational times, there is a solvent demand in cinematic cinema, which means this new director will definitely appear, we'll talk in five years, it was a podcast burn with fire and i, its host iznis gorelov with a story about the main current cinematic trends

hello, this is a podcast lab, my name is dmitry bak, i am the host of a literary podcast, which has a wonderful name, let them not talk, let them read, today we will talk about how they read or write books about the past, books about history and my interlocutor today, doctor... thank you for coming to us, and well , in the traditions of our program, i would like to start from the very beginning, well, maybe you can briefly tell us how it happened that in your youth you were fascinated by history how it all began, well, to be honest, i was going to

to enter a military school, i come from a family of hereditary military men, specifically... the school named after the supreme council, the highest command school, but already in the ninth grade they explained to me that due to my eyesight i am not suitable for a command school, only for some technical one, since i i wanted to be a commander, and my favorite book was mityaeva, the book of future commanders, yes, we know this one, but from childhood, he had to retrain as a civilian and there are further options, since his favorite subjects were literature and history at school, then, accordingly, i was preparing to enroll: at the same time i attended preparatory courses at moscow university and the mgemo faculty of international journalism. yes. why mgemo, because we essentially have two specialized specializations there, journalism and the history of international relations. does history pay more attention to things that are close or different? international journalism, history of international relations. the history of the kps is embedded in this totality.

ss, well, i had it, three pairs each a week, always, then the history of the ussr, the history of the east, the history of european countries, america, these are all separate subjects, slavic countries yes, as a separate subject, and then there is regional studies, that is, the history of the country of its first language, but in those years, in universities like magimo, gites, exams were a month earlier than all the others , you could only enter one university, everyone failed , they calmly went with their documents to another, to enter a normal university, i had everything planned, i failed mgemo and after that’s why i applied for the faculty of history, but i got in, that’s why it turned out, so... four more exams were taken by the ibaltestat, this is me on my own, a creative competition, four exams, and an interview, well, gradually, as i understand it, after all, for some... that period history, well, it occupied most

of the professional spectrum, no, i can’t say, well, for example, when i had the honor of serving in the ministry of culture, those are also close topics, cultural heritage, history, uh, culture - a comprehensive concept, so would it be so otherwise, this craving for history from childhood, it was realized, then i was tasked with creating the recreation, correctly speaking , of the russian military-historical society, it is such a successor, one might say, of the imperial, imperial military station in russia, since ancient times, when there were imperial societies , geographical, palestinian, but they are all recreated today. please tell me, but still, history is a very wide field, as we see even from your fate as a professional, after all, for you this is first

everything, a continuation of a youthful romantic dream, or it is a strict academic profession, or it is a means of persuasion, a means of communication, very different meanings are attached to this word, and, well, first of all... i think we need to distinguish between two meanings: history is something ... something significant that happened in the past, yes , or simply significant, they say, historical events are happening around, after all, for you history comes first, what? well, everything you listed, all this, all this exists, and of course history is politics, and politics thrown back into the past, yes, yes, yes, history, of course, is important... a component in any country in any civilization, an important component of ideology, explaining something, starting from something, motivating, giving canons of behavior, and i in general

i am inclined to believe that history is not so much in modern conditions, in modern conditions, understanding science, all this is true, but in modern conditions history is not only... the science of the past, but the science of the future, because it gives very serious reasons, these accumulated millennia civilizational experience provide grounds for prediction, history never repeats itself, but there are still some cycles , even though it is not repeated verbatim, yeah, but since the situations in which people find themselves are somehow identical, and humanity is like us you and i know very well, here is a man... he has practically not changed in the last, well, how many 3,000 years we can observe there , well, of course, well, not at all, well, completely, completely, only technology changes and technology, then accordingly, the human reaction on those

or other similar ones, it is predictable, yes, it is predictable, accordingly, the better you know history, the more accurately you can predict, and what will happen after that, simply by analogy, you know, like a judicial one. these medicines help, but these don’t, these herbs heal, and these cure, and these , therefore, history today is already a science, it is not only the chronicle of humanity, it is not only records of the past, but it is also a forecast of the future, tell me, and can be formulated in such a way that the better a person knows history, the more free he is from emotions, from hasty decisions, from the belief that everything is happening for the first time, for example, there was 1863, the polish riot, the skating rinks on the one hand, the westerners on the other hand, poland,

for our and your freedom, europe supports, well, of course, that this is a complete picture, of a much later time, so neatly, let's say, if not modern, it turns out that even the seventeenth year is not so. an important milestone, if we remember that all this happened, does this make it possible to maintain some kind of sobriety, not to become unconditionally does history provide academic sobriety? history gives wisdom, yeah, and gives an understanding that we are not exclusive today, moreover, our ancestors, and the more i sometimes dive into the history of certain similar situations as we have, there are a lot of them, the more i understand that our ancestors, in many ways, not owning iphones and fashionable programs, were wiser than us, namely, they found... understandable, non

-technological, human solutions in certain difficult situations, and what they created was more durable, therefore of course, well, any person who wants to adequately assess the present, of course, must know history, so you said a wise thing that our ancestors managed without many gadgets, without many simplifications, databases, but they had to... go everywhere, i remember the phrase of theodor adorn, a philosopher and musicologist, who said that in order to enjoy music, you need to go to where it is performed, that is, perform some difficult action, this is actually a very wise thing, now everything seems to be too easy there , yes and one might think that it never happened, but there is a wonderful beginning of the days of the alexanders, and then the mysticism into which alexander ii falls, meaning, or there is a wonderful beginning of alexander ii as the future liberator.

and this is the end with the attempt at dictatorship of the heart of lori smelikova, yes, all these are understandable sinusoids that really allow us to predict a lot, well, these are the ones that are interesting in our history, clearly, tell me, this is such a thing, very important, after all, there is academic history as something unchangeable well, positivist, let's say, yes , with an unchanged set of some truths, or after all - well, all the sayings about the unpredictable past and so on, they are still true, well, a dry dry theory my friend, but the tree of life, for example, yes, you can talk about a positivist true history, or does it change as the person who looks at it changes, you know, i’m not in the concept of positivist, or positive, sometimes they say history, i put slightly different meanings, because history is not just a set of some facts, dates, yes, sources that may open up to us in a new way, because

we are not making many new historical discoveries now , yes, but we can take a fresh look at certain accomplished facts and so on, which is associated with a new look, well, we we always look at history, it’s like a school of anal studies, yes, we always look at history from modern times , i just wanted to ask you, modernity interests us, we try to find answers to the questions of modernity, even if we are not aware of it. but the question is different, the question is, uh, uh, will you look at history based on your current ideas about good and evil, yeah, then it will be, well, basically everything will be terrible, terrible, of course, everything is terrible, how is that possible it was, ivan the terrible, lord, it means that guilliotina is there, uh, stalin, so to speak, slept through the beginning of the war, so, and yes, where, where we don’t look, or, you are still the leadership. principles of historicism, you will strive

to look at history based on that time, that is, to separate yourself from research, not just separate, but forget about yourself altogether forget in general, try to imagine yourself as an observer in that, in those ideas about morality and morality, in those ideas about legality, in those circumstances of the surrounding world, legislation, language, customs, yeah.