[000:00:00;00] we heard about two different versions of what happened to the hospital in the gas, on which someone dealt a very serious destructive blow, as a result of which , according to various estimates, several hundred people died, some were only 200, others even 800 , but the fact that the figure was in the hundreds was not disputed, today i... in general, find these disputes to be academic, without great practical consequences, because with the way israel bombs gaza, it uses punishments as a method palestinians in carpet bombing, arguing about who caused a specific blow, it seems to me, is not very relevant, i already

cited henry key’s favorite statement on the program when he accused the soviet union many, many years ago, that the soviet union supported the palestine liberation organizations, they told him in moscow that this is a specific crime, the soviet union had nothing to do with him, and kisinger did not enter into an argument, but he said in response, if you start , to say that a particular stone was not thrown by you is not very convincing, so this is what the israelis do, of course, translate this the debate about a specific episode, it seems to me, is not very constructive, what impressed me perhaps most from a geopolitical point of view was

israel's decision to strike the syrian airports in damascus in adepa, israel says that this was a justified action, because supposedly through these airports, hezbollah received weapons from iran, but the question immediately arises to me: what russia could be, we need to bang, at the points of transporting weapons to ukraine. in poland in romania why not? if this is the logic, that if someone points a weapon against you, then you should not, should not wait until this weapon is used against you. i understand that in nato in washington, that there must be some kind of symmetry here, and this does not even occur to them, but i think that

this comes to mind in moscow. just a few days ago, president putin, speaking about the growing involvement of the united states in the war in ukraine, he said that in washington they deny, but we think so, from my point of view, the russian president made it clear that in its actions, russia will be guided by what they think in moscow, and not by what they say in washington, but the last thing that really struck me was an article in the washington post, an article by quite serious and well-known journalists, about , like ceru, for almost a decade, on a large scale , not just supported, the ukrainian special services, but actually helped them in organizing

terrorist attacks, including against the crimean bridge, including an attack on the kremlin, including the villainous murder of daria dugina, i i don’t even know what to say about this? well, for many, it’s probably obvious that the cia should have been involved in this kind of action, at a very high level, but i didn’t expect this, let’s see what official kiev said in response to the accusation that the ukrainian special services were responsible for the terrorist attack

against ukraine has absolutely nothing to do with this, because we are not a criminal state like russia and not a terrorist one, that’s what the washington post writes. representatives of the security service stated that not a single major operation of the sbu or gur is carried out without the direct permission of zelsky or without his tacit consent? it is not carried out, and this article claims that they had many sources in washington, in kiev, in the cia, in the ukrainian intelligence services, in the american white house, like that. the security service is an experienced and highly honored

counterintelligence officer. senator, i will now call you by your current title, here is your reaction to this, are you as surprised as i am or did you expect something like this? you know, with one i'm surprised. because such things are generally kept for as long as possible, but not disclosed, the fact that the americans published such a publication for the first time makes me think that maybe this is their attempt to distance themselves from ukraine, from the current policy of ukraine, gradually they begin to tell things that they previously hid behind these seals, well, in general, of course, it’s no secret that the cia... controlled the security service of ukraine, i once said, i think, even on your program, that one of the floors of the building

security service of ukraine, was given to the tserushniks, their instructors who sat there, did not allow anyone on their floor , i have this information not classified, i say right away, not promptly, this is told by former counterintelligence officers of the security service of ukraine, who after the fourteenth year were forced out and fired from the body there, nalyvaichenko was in charge of this service, by the way, a graduate of a special school, well, now it’s called the fsb academy, he was the head at that time, he was the head, he was the head for several months, yes, now he is a deputy of the verkhovna rada, he in the opinion of retired ukrainian counterintelligence officers, this is an agent of the central intelligence agency, he worked entirely under their leadership, and of course, what they are now saying is that zelsky

knew, of course, he knew. from email correspondence, this is basically the same article, i read it, it says that, in general, they prepared material for the sbu, and the sbu carried out these attacks in full, so let's see what the washington post says in that article that we just started discussing about the connections between the ukrainian security service and the the terrorist attacks involved elite ukrainian special forces that were formed, trained and equipped in close cooperation with the cia, ukrainian officials told the us. since 2015, the cia has spent tens of millions of dollars to turn

ukraine's soviet-era intelligence agencies into powerful allies in the confrontation with moscow. the agency not only provided kiev with a modern surveillance system, trained recruits in ukraine, and built a headquarters for the leadership of military intelligence ukraine in the united states , in addition, the cia has shared intelligence on a scale that was previously unimaginable before the illegal annexation of crimea and the outbreak of the war in donbass. according to american officials, the cia maintains a significant presence in ukraine. so that we understand, we are talking about the fact that such cooperation did not begin after the start of a special military operation, from the fourteenth year, after the liberation of crimea, it is very specific here that the cooperation included the regular killings of people who collaborated with the donetsk people's republic, lugansk, occupied some positions there, journalists, people with

pro-russian sympathies, the article also says that kiev waged a systematic campaign of disinformation, claiming that these murders were the result of some kind of internal... feuds, criminal showdowns, although in fact all this was the work of the ukrainian special services. let's listen to what the washington post wrote about the cia's reaction to the fact that their wards went too far, in quotes, including in the terrorist attacks in moscow. let's listen. the extent of the cia's involvement in the work of the ukrainian security services has not previously been disclosed. american intelligence officials emphasized that the cia was not involved in ukrainian intelligence operations to eliminate people, and that its work was aimed at expanding kiev's ability to collect intelligence on activities. a senior intelligence official said

any potential operational problems were clearly communicated to ukrainian services. but let’s listen to the following, specifically how the cia reacted when kiev went too far from washington’s point of view far. us and ukrainian officials said that both sides tried to keep their distance so that the cia would not be involved in terrorist operations carried out by its kiev partners, after... such terrorist attacks , cia representatives expressed their objections, but the agency did not refuse further cooperation. employees located in kiev were aware of ukraine's most ambitious plans to carry out terrorist attacks. at times, american officials expressed concern, as in the case of the explosion on the crimean bridge, expressed concern, but the article goes on to say that they never warned the zelsky government that this kind of behavior was incompatible with the cia leadership receiving

american assistance. the question just arose, raised by senator dzhabarov, what did the top leadership of the cia know? well, the highest in this case is the director of the cia, william berrens, a man in moscow, well known, because he was an ambassador for several years and, in general, an ambassador from my point of view. very effective and which was used in moscow respect and even sympathy, i definitely have respect for him, because for a period i felt respect, sympathy, i also felt respect and sympathy for him when he returned to washington and became under secretary of state for political affairs, i repeatedly received emails from him in response to my articles that he agreed with what i was writing, i described

that it was necessary to have a more constructive policy towards moscow, and he wrote: i hope that they will listen to you, well, to be honest, i was a little surprised, because if he was with this i agree, then you should have listened, not to me, but to him, but people change, and when mr. ... the secretary, it seemed to me that he completely fit in, if you like, into the washington globalist party, i must admit, i’m after somehow i stopped seeing him, he didn’t invite me, and i didn’t ask to see him, but you andrnik , i understand, you met with him, met him, dmitry, not only here in moscow, when he was ambassador, well, many times then we met

on different occasions. at the embassy in some place, even ambassador dubinin, who organized the voter of the central central election commission, so he invited various ambassadors and bernz, in particular, also invited him to speak, for communication, and so on, but the most interesting thing is that i ran into him when he was already in the position of first deputy secretary of state , in his office, i always perceived him as an intelligent and subtle person, suddenly he began to seriously convince me that if american aircraft had not struck gaddafi on his supporters, he says, gaddafi would have been in benghaz was already preparing to carry out a massacre and genocide of an entire people, i say, that is, he, he spoke to you, although he knew you for many

years, he made fools of you, so i remembered then, by the way, dmitry, i remembered you when you spoke , and i, i’ll tell you now, in what connection i remembered when you, i when i cited such cases, and you said, you know, this man became an opportunist, that is, he was already, it was already comfortable to fit into this general build so as not to stand out, because to stand out and be smarter, who do not adhere to the general lines. and the general line was like this, here’s vitaly churkin, our outstanding ambassador, with whom you were very friends, we were very friends, and he always told me, andryanek, that’s why, that means, in libya and so far, he says,

here women won over the men, when bob gates, mueller, four-star, well, the chief of the joint committee of staff, they said: no, we can’t close the air, we have to inflict and disable, which means air defense, and this war, we don’t need it. but hillary, susan rice and samantha power, they insisted, and it was carried out, and no matter what bill burns' position was, he built into this position, because it became the prevailing position already in the administration, unfortunately, and you can imagine that he did not know. well, first of all, i can’t imagine this, but another thing, i had one thought that i want to share with you, in general, this is a rare case when , hot on the heels of an american prominent

liberal newspaper supporting both ukraine and the administration, suddenly gives one like this. this is for me suggests that there is a very serious split within the administration and in american elite circles, there is a desire to a discredit the cia, b - to discredit all those who support ukraine today, therefore, frankly speaking, in a number of cases, related issues have come to light, it’s not for nothing that tucker carson regularly says: that the cia participated in the assassination of john f. kennedy, kennedy jr. , recently constantly in his speeches, says: “yes, he says, when my uncle was killed, the first thing my father said, and i was a nine-year-old boy, he immediately called director tsro and said

: “your guys did this, and you know, not only that, then , when these cases were revealed, twitter and so on, it turned out that not only the fbi worked against trump, but the cia also worked against trump during the election campaign, that is, i want to say that this has a deep-seated basis, why did this suddenly appear, otherwise such information would not have been received, it would not have appeared today in such an influential newspaper, justice radio, however, the so-called deep state, like by the way, you said already on this program, it was in general... in general against trump and is the base of support for biden and bill burns, in addition to the fact that he is a very experienced distinguished diplomat, he is also a very experienced successful bureaucrat, very loyal

it’s precisely this team, this is his team , so that he doesn’t know that he has lost control over his building to such an extent, it’s... hard for me to imagine, but if bill behrents knew about it, we must assume that the adviser knew about it for national security, jake solovan and secretary of state blinkon, the question arises about president biden himself, i can’t of course say anything with certainty, but we must at least admit the possibility that the top leadership of the united states knew about terrorism, objectively... it was supported and then read by russia , moral lessons, they told their russian counterparts, they say, let us tell each other only the truth, so that we are not ashamed to look each other in the eyes,

so they said this, knowing about the role of the united states in organizing terrorism in city ​​of moscow. i just wanted to clarify one detail, but zelsky, of course, gave permission to carry out terrorist attacks. the head of the cia could have found out after the fact that a terrorist attack had occurred, the terrorist attack was carried out by ukrainians , of course he knew that, but it’s like that, well, or rather there is nothing good in this, but in principle, it seems to me, we talked about this topic, let's move on to another. and an equally important topic, with us is our regular, very honored, interesting military expert, dmitry drozdenko, i have a question for you, dmitriy. in the same article, it is said that

those people who worked with the ukrainians justified ukrainian behavior, american complicity with this behavior by the fact that, well, let’s say, the war will write off everything, and that what the ukrainian authorities, the ukrainian special services did, can be considered a legitimate military operation against an enemy. your reaction to this statement? well, if you allow me, i’ll still go back a little, because well, the murder of dugina is somewhat personal for me, because i knew her quite well personally. maybe, let’s assume that burns did not know about the operations to eliminate individual people, but neither bence nor biden could have been unaware of the terrorist attacks on the crimean bridge and the first and second ones, because these were complex technical operations, when the machine passed several borders, when in a special way there was a terrorist attack, that is, the special services could not not know this, they could not help but help in this

situation, further, a terrorist attack that was committed with the help of attack boats, especially since this could not be carried out, if only because the communication channels were carried out by starling, the equipment that was on these systems was american and british, intelligence data was supplied by those guys, a drone strike on the kremlin, no drone would reach if...' to know the hidden weak points of the air defense, this is a very difficult technical task that the americans did with the help of their technical intelligence means, so they are there completely , he couldn’t not know, because these are too risky operations when it is unknown what russia’s response will be, so yes, my opinion, well, i’m more young, to be more careful, probably biden and definitely, the burns knew about this, about his repainting, well, please, a living example, the former commander of nato forces of europe general hodgens, that is, he had enough cautious statements as a correct brigadier general, when

he was the commander, as soon as he retired, let’s say, he got carried away, that is, to blow up everyone, kill everyone and the like, and then the war will write off everything or not, uh, i don’t know, but whether it has, let me be more precise i’ll formulate my question, can you agree that these terrorist actions , as it were, outrage... you know, part of the action can, with a very big stretch, be attributed to the sabotage struggle, but most of it, like the murder of dugina, the murder of tatarsky, terrorist attacks on moscow and the crimean bridge are already terrorist acts, according to, well, roughly speaking, all the concepts, canons of war, depending on the territory on which they are carried out. and the sbu of ukraine, yes, you were right , senator, there is a whole floor there, i also

had this information and also from the same people, moreover, the cooperation was until the fourteenth year, that is, around the fourteenth year they blocked this floor, it had already completely begun, well, large-scale cooperation, and before that, just like the tsar , they were present in the ranks of the esbu and indeed they were trained for many, many years, just as they were preparing the whole the political establishment of ukraine, precisely for the confrontation with russia, uh, they explained the murder of daria dugina this way, ukrainian, cia contacts, they explained it in such a way that, firstly, the intended victim should not have been daria, but her father, but to kill her father was completely legitimate, because he acted as a nationalist. and said some very hostile things towards ukraine. when i read this, i have two reactions to this,

well, the first reaction is stated in the same article, and we also know this from the information that was provided by the investigative committee, the fsb. after all, the woman who played the central role of the performers of the act, she was not watching alexander. they kept an eye on her daughter, they settled this, i don’t know what to call her, person in the house where she lived, daria dugina, they were watching her, i don’t know, so who should have been the main target, but what they assumed was that during the terrorist attack they would strike a girl who was also a russian patriot, but not

was a participant in the military conflict, they knew what they were doing, they did it deliberately, i’ll tell you what: i still knew a little about american presidents, i worked a lot with nixon, as andronik knows, but that was already after his administration, but i have repeatedly spoken in the eighties with ronald reagan, who, well, was a very big anti-communist and called the soviet union an evil empire, i absolutely cannot imagine. so that if this kind of terrorist attack occurred in moscow, at the height of the cold war, so that the first thing reagan did would not be to pick up the phone , call his friend cia director bill casey, look for him, your people did it, so that he would not do it during the first

10 minutes after he received such information, i’ll be honest, i can’t even imagine such a thing, therefore, i don’t being sure that biden knew what biden did not know, but i can say with debatable certainty that if biden received information that this happened, knew about other terrorist acts committed by ukraine, if after that he did not ask what was happening and when he discovered it, didn't stop it immediately, if anyone at this table believes biden is not personally responsible, please explain why? dmitry, you gave a good example of reagan, i was in his library in sim volley, this is a wonderful library, where he a huge plane, cavalcata there and so on, i was shocked by the fact that the first

thing he did upon entering the white house and there was his letter to brezh, the first letter he wrote was immediately after the terrorist attack against regen, he had just begun to recover in the hospital, and he wrote, we have a special responsibility , we must be serious and agree to protect the world from a possible big war, this should be the case, given his anti-komism, with his very... statements addressed to the soviet union, that we must throw it away the dustbin of history, that this is an evil empire and so on, inside he was really a very serious and responsible person, i say, i have this letter, the first one, this is one of his first actions that he did in the white house, so for example, i don’t

i can believe that he could allow this, i can only give my personal reaction, it is very simple , they say that they don’t negotiate with terrorists, this is not true, you have to negotiate with terrorists, negotiate when, uh, you want to free the hostages, or when for some reason, the lives of thousands of your fellow citizens are under threat, or because you know that they can do something terrible and you want to warn them about the most serious consequences. but if you even have to deal with them, like of course russia has to deal with the united states since the biden administration, because i don't see any other rational option, but i think we all need to understand that we are dealing with people, who combine their own moral

preaching with the support of international terrorism. and this cold understanding is very important in developing a pragmatic, realistic approach to the biden administration. general, no, you’re just talking about decent administrations , nixon, tajo reagan, the people there had some other conscience, yes, a properly prepared classic policy, but the fact that now, who is leading america, well, take the same blinken, take , well, excuse me, but i don’t even know what else to call them, well, we all know what to call them, we won’t drive the nail completely into the surface, but we all understand what we are talking about, and most importantly, we understand who we are dealing with, we go to advertising, we will return in just a few

minutes, he specifically wrote a hit in order to receive large royalties, somewhere he was ashamed, sometimes, when they reproached him for this, we understood that he could write anything. what’s interesting is that he lived with all his wives for 4 years, only with tatyana nikolaevna he lived for 24. i lived in the feeling that we couldn’t part with him at all, that’s how he liked to say, you and i don’t look at each other friend, we look in one direction, on the ninety-fifth anniversary of the birth of yuri

saulsky, today on the first, castra rum, a product of the stellar group, give it a brief description. i’m very willing to add. gentlemen, what's the matter? eliminating koch is of great political

importance. is it worth risking such a valuable agent to eliminate koch? based on real events. a true intelligence officer must be ready for anything. along the razor blade. premiere of the film series. coming soon to the first, he is the enemy, and you fell in love with him like a cat you get pleasure. russian grand prix, live broadcasts

on october 28 and 29 on the first. let's see, it will be very interesting. love figure skating, adore figure skating, appreciate figure skating. there is a big game on the air, we have talked a lot over the past months about the war in ukraine, but now we need to talk about two wars, and what is happening in the middle east is superimposed on the situation in ukraine, and of course creates additional threats to international security , especially since, as in the case of ukraine, the administration biden talks about the escalation of her escalation and, in general, makes it clear that for her any negotiations, any compromises, are

like concessions to the devil, concessions to autocrats, and america will go ahead with its allies. let's listen to what general austin has to say about this. we are concerned about the threat of possible escalation. essentially, what we see is the prospect of a significant escalation in attacks on our troops by our people throughout the region. therefore , we will do everything necessary to ensure that our troops are in a good position, protected, and could answer. and general austin promised, let's hear it, to send more troops. after consultation with president joe biden, i have ordered a number of additional measures to strengthen our position. in the middle east, these steps will promote deterrence, strengthen u.s. military protection in the region, and help israel's defense. i have ordered the deployment of a tet battery and additional patriot battalions to the region to provide greater security

to american forces. i also gave orders to be ready to deploy additional troops in case of unforeseen circumstances. i would like to draw your attention to the last phrase: be prepared to deploy additional troops in case of unforeseen circumstances. this is the problem, when the united states sends aircraft carriers, but it is necessary to send cover groups, when they send cover groups, it is necessary to send additional air defense assets, when they send these assets, they begin to think whether they should send marines, just so, just in case, and so that no one has doubts about the seriousness of american intentions, do you think, dmitry, that this kind of show of force, plus

the british sent their warships, do you think that this show of force can contribute to reconciliation in the middle east? no, i don’t think so, because the military never achieves peace in this way, regarding additional forces , well, in general, each of the auks, one, gerald ford is already there, esenhower is there and has marines in its composition, has in its composition and air defense systems at the base yasminovtseverg additional air force assets are sent there and the battery is actually deployed. the goal, as i said in the last program, a possible goal is to support israel in the event of a war on two fronts, or even three, that is, precisely the direction towards lebanon, the direction towards iran.

why are such powerful forces needed? the same hamas literally a few decades ago, those rockets that they launched towards israel, but they flew ten kilometers there, had, well, no characteristics, that is, it was a home-made hail, in fact, now the missiles they make themselves are already flying distances to tel aviv, they are already overloading their famous iron dome system, that is, it’s just this small enclave, if we’re talking about yemen, then there’s already joint... development with iran , this is kuts-3, a cruise missile, which in general is akin to the magavk, has such a range that, in principle, it can cause harm , and maybe defeat, in principle, the ships that are concentrated there, this is now a very explosive region, since there are new technologies , new technologies, cheaper, simpler, they gave perhaps a long hand to those who do not have aviation, to those who do not have their own rocket science, that is, the world is technologically...

to a new level, the west is really afraid, i think, at this moment , if there is an escalation, namely in the israeli-palestinian conflict, and judging by the behavior of israel, such an escalation is possible, but the rubicon of this point will be precisely the ground operation in the gas sector, that is , they will begin to carry out it, they will not start, if they do, then will it be successful, because if everything this will not succeed, then the pendulum will swing... towards some kind of measurement in this situation, but if it is successful, then on this wave blows will most likely be carried towards lebanon, it will be easy to find a reason, regarding diplomacy, i asked the officials persons in moscow, whether the united states approached russia with a proposal for some kind of joint actions, and as i heard, nothing...

serious, nothing significant has happened yet. do you have information, senator, that the united states in this case is trying to supplement military actions, some diplomatic initiatives. no, no, i don’t have such information, but i agree with my colleague that, after all, the fact that two aircraft carrier groups are directed towards closer, well, closer to sorugaza, this suggests that a serious conflict could break out there at any moment , i think i remember the words of our president , who said in beijing that he recently talked with the leaders of the leading countries in the region, everyone made it clear that no one is interested in continuing hostilities, but in order to stop them, it is necessary so that there is more the desire of not only these countries, but also russia and , of course, the united states of america

, i think that... russia is ready to be mediators in the negotiations, the americans need to show good will, while the americans are ready to somehow increase the tension in the conflict, the situation, trying improve their position, i still can’t even fully understand, although i assume what the uk’s role is there , because the uk is not a player that will sit on the sidelines and remain silent, i think that they also regulate many things, in particular... we know that great britain, in general, wherever it was, everywhere it participated in the creation of all kinds of acute situations in the same palestine, starting in 1947. when somewhat similar events unfolded in levvan in the year eighty-three, i was just there, as a columnist for the newspaper christian science moni and from time to time wrote for

the new york times, i had the opportunity to see everything that happened with my own eyes, and the truth was not , aircraft carriers, but battleship big, new jersey. and so he had to carry out a humanitarian mission, help save palestinians from israel, help them evacuate from beirut. but very soon, the battleship found itself involved in hostilities . moreover, the countries in this region did not even fully understand what was happening. i spoke then with uh, one of the syrian leaders, rifat assad, who was the brother of the syrian president, and commanded the syrian security forces, he also studied in moscow, graduated from

the general staff academy, not knowing what happened, in as a result of his studies, he, in general, began to feel worse about the soviet union , not better, and decided to spend more time in buying a house even in the suburbs of washington as a descendant, this house quickly burned down, there were rumors that masad helped him burn down, because that they really didn’t want rifat assad, as if he lived constantly hanging out in washington , he returned back to damascus and played a very large role there, and i intuited him several times for my articles, he expressed his surprise to me at the actions of the united states, he said , well, you say, you know, we have of course, very close relations with moscow, but we are completely open to relations with america, and we had nothing

to do with these latest terrorist acts against israel, no one even accuses us of this, why are they hitting us with our allies, and i i couldn’t give a good... explanation other than, well, because that’s how it is, and since you’ve arrived, since you refuse to obey, to cooperate, then somehow you need to be convinced, and how else to convince, especially with such a ling nearby, andronik, you say when you look at the president biden, in this very difficult situation, do you think he is able to make... thoughtful analytical decisions, and i know that you had a very interesting conversation about him with former secretary of defense robert gates, who, by the way, was previously director of the cia, and you spoke with him, just about this man, about the current president, there are a lot

of derogatory judgments about biden, but what gates said simply shocked me, he says, i’ve known him for 40 years, i ’ve been various meetings in the cr. the ministry of defense, in the administration and so on, in all these years he never had a single sensible proposal or a single sensible idea, he just floated back and forth, and the most interesting thing is that he never even got exactly what the administration wants, until recently, here is one of the examples given when he even, when they took him, to the head of alkaida, and even there he was against this action, that we could upset pakistan, we would have some problems there and so on, therefore,

but i'm interested in this question on another level point of view, you know, all the major analytical programs are asking this question on fox, is he , then, cognitively normal enough... state to cope with this complex situation, everyone unanimously says: no, all the experts they invite , one of the most active and leading presidential candidates in the republican party today, last week he gave an interview to tucker carlson, there was a very interesting conversation when he said: you know, what biden says is as if he is giving, and lloyd austin, it's like as if they are giving a blank check to israel, this cannot be done, because even... by the way , in the latest issue of foreign affairs, richard

has already wrote: because a true friend in such difficult circumstances must speak bitterly, but the truth, guys, don’t let your emotions, cloud your mind. be careful, be restrained, because if you go down this path, carpet bombing, killing thousands and thousands of people, you will only make yourself... bad, you - and if the american position is like this, then the escalation could reach a big war, and ramaslaami said, well, this is categorically unacceptable, we have already gone through this, 7 trillion iraqi afghan war, so many killed, and there is no result, this will be another defeat, unfortunately, as they say, they all sympathize with israel, but this will be a defeat both the usa and israel in such. going back to your conversation with former

secretary of defense gates, he made one particular argument about biden, not to me personally, in his books, he says that biden has always been on the opposite side common sense, like this during the first gulf war, when iraq clearly occupied uga, and when almost all arab countries supported the coalition led by the united states and the soviet union, by the way, supported it, and even saudi arabia, and even syria , biden, voted against american intervention in 2003, under another republican administration, busho mladchev, when there were no weapons of mass destruction there. he fully supported american intervention. such analytical talent

american president. we're leaving for advertising, we'll be back in just a few minutes. the road of life to artyomovsk. it is in such places that our help is primarily needed. the most dangerous thing is to get to the front line and leave, that is, the road. and asked to convey here in artyomovsk, as well as the true story of the feat of female doctors. i worked in surgery for 16 years, i realized that i should just be here, i only regret one thing, that i didn’t do it earlier, we haven’t become worse or better, but we are no longer the same let's become, i bow to the feat of the doctors who are there, and what is nastya's call sign, guardian angel, anti-fake, premiere, tomorrow on the first, 1 2 3 4 5 i'm leaving

to look for you serial killers are divided into four different types in accordance with their motivations , one way or another they kill because of love, you are probably a writer, you sent a request to him, they don’t have such an employee. do you know igor well? don't you drink coffee, no girl? you're scaring me? i love you. i'm in pain. don't come here

anymore. what do you like about the honey? the territory is soon on the first, maybe the tail will hang behind him? let's wait, his head is full of other things right now, it's just a cold, we'll answer your questions about acute respiratory infections. edible dishes, put down, our service works better, we eliminate the pain in explaining, the program to live healthy, helps everyone, tomorrow on the first , the big game is on the air, president biden has a difficult task, he is trying to convince congress to allocate almost 100 billion

dollars, i did not make a reservation, almost 100 billion dollars for further assistance to ukraine. primarily military assistance, and there is money in this package for israel, and for taiwan, and for protecting the american border with mexico, but 61 billion, more than half is supposed to be given to our beloved ukraine. i don’t think that this will happen, but that ukraine will receive something, and that it will be a significant amount. in general, i think that this is very likely, and dmitry , it’s not for me to tell you, you know better than me that ukraine is receiving, one after another, new packages of military assistance, and there are more

and more new weapons there, more and more long-range, increasingly more effective, and very often, just 3 months ago in washington they said that such weapons cannot be supplied , because it would be a dangerous path of escalation, we don’t want world war iii, but then it soon turns out that such supplies are possible and even necessary. i want to get your assessment of the extent to which these supplies to ukraine, to what extent they change the military situation, well then we need to consider the theory of deterrence within the framework of increasing escalation. where, when there is a threat, the threat must be realistic, the threat must be feasible and there must be the will to carry out this threat, without seeing the first, second, third, the americans move on, and if we look at the whole situation from a military point of view, then having failed, in principle already in the ground offensive, as i already said

, there will be a new stage of military operations, that is, it will be an air war, a missile war, and this is what is happening in principle , that is, in order to prevent... now russia goes on a counter-offensive, it is necessary to isolate the battlefield, longer-range missiles appear, which i think were delivered much earlier than officially recognized by the west, but of course, of course, and i think that there are not 20 of them , because if we are talking about mgm140a block 1, this is exactly what the ukrainians used, it has a range of about 160 kilometers and 900 or so damaging elements, this is the oldest missile in this series about a year ago, here is the second one, 140b - this is a missile that has a longer range of up to 300 km, a smaller number of striking elements , but also with the same poor guidance systems, that is, if the first has a probable circular deviation of about 250 m, so it’s like a cassette all of itself, the second carries a smaller number

of charges, but still has a quo of the order of about 100 m, what did the americans do with them, the first, they have something like that ... there were 1,200- odd pieces left, and about 500 others. they are now armed with another, different missiles, more advanced guidance systems, high-explosive fragmentation bulls, they are old, they have been modernized to the next level, in principle, in principle, now both old and new ones will be subject to decommissioned with the advent of a new missile, the precision strike missile is a prism program , which, as i understand, will begin to arrive in the near future, this missile is already... modern, maneuverable, with a range of 500 km, which comes with this installation, that is, this entire arsenal, especially america’s old one, is no longer needed, there is no need to sell it somewhere either, because let’s say taiwan is immediately supplied with more advanced missiles, accordingly, given their practice, why not give it to ukraine, so that they inflict them with their hands to cause maximum harm

to our troops, that is, so that we cannot advance to the front line and so on and so on and so on, without seeing an answer for ourselves... for the united states personally, that is, we can respond to ukraine as much as we like, but they do not see a threat themselves, until they see it, these deliveries will accordingly continue, fighters will be next, and the target of these fighters will not be the same as many believe, that they will not launch cruise missiles, no, the f-16 is not suitable for launching either franco-british or german missiles, their task will be to fight our fighters, that is, the war will move into the airspace, and thus they not only... russia, but also test all their types of weapons, tactics, reveal our problems without revealing theirs. therefore, the question of when supplies will continue is complex. as for financing, now, most likely, the americans will begin to gradually step aside, shifting the financing of the conflict to europe. we will deal with israel,

you deal with ukraine. by the way, i don’t rule out the option in case something goes wrong in the middle east. that america will also begin to smoothly step aside, leaving israel only with military-technical and financial assistance, that is, without avoiding participation in this conflict, are such situations possible? maybe yes. from the fact, personally, that victory over russia is impossible, because russia has, this is not, bravado, but russia has many untapped opportunities to do a variety of things, i also proceed from the fact that the russian leadership has the readiness , do everything necessary to avoid defeat, and even more broadly achieve victory, but i also think, of course, this delays the operation, it costs lives, it prevents russia from doing those things

that are priority, priority - in terms of internal development, what, let’s say, is spent on creating new weapons, i think many of us would prefer that this be spent on the creation of artificial intelligence, which in a military sense, in the long term, is the most important, but it seems to me that this situation, when ukraine is constantly pumped with weapons, when ukraine is generally used, the united states, like estria spears, and when the united states is actually the central participant in the conflict, i'm not making any recommendations, i just can't imagine the russian leadership will tolerate this in the long term without some very serious response, what do you think, senator? you know, i would just

like to tell you that today the chairman of the federation council matuenko, together with members of the defense and security committee, visited the national defense control center, where defense minister sergei met with them kuzheketovich shaigum. i was just talking to colleagues from this committee. but you know, they are in such a pleasant shock, because they realized that you are right, russia’s potential is not comparable to what ukraine, all of western europe, and even the americans will change even now, and i think that when such meetings, this shows that we are confident in our victory, and i think that all this spending of the americans, which now, as you said, is forgotten by the old old ruklets, that’s right, they are trying to inflict. for maximum damage, you know, i think we calmly, step by step, we will grind and move towards our goals. in my opinion,

this is the goal of destroying this regime, no less, no less, no less, i do not agree. andronik, you know, i think that indeed, very serious shifts are taking place today in public consciousness and in the united states, well, for example , yesterday i read, 71% of the republican party electorate is against giving even a penny and taking some part in all this, what is happening to ukraine. also, of course, dare-liberals, this attitude works, well, it’s as if there is an inter -party consensus, these, well, completely crazy ideas of biden, that we are a democracy, while ukraine is increasingly being presented in the american media as