[000:00:00;00] uh, it suits me, i’m kind of immodest, it goes, it goes, thank you, yes, but when i realized this , of course, things began to appear in my wardrobe, firstly, uh, things of these colors, which is important, and of course, such strict lines, this makes me a lot mm, not that older, but more serious, for sure, but it seems to you, it really seems to me, too , that it’s going straight to the barback. i can’t imagine, neither can i, oh, i can’t imagine myself either, honestly, well, while working on the film, you became real experts in the preppe style, so let's now give a recommendation to our viewers about where to start, and if you put together such a small prep capsule in your wardrobe, what things should definitely be there, first of all you need to determine which color scheme suits your

appearance best. that is, more contrasting or softer, more discreet, start with the color scheme, let’s say you have chosen what you have - you are blonde with blue eyes, blue suits you, beige, most likely you can add - gray, probably, yes you can gray, naturally , yes the color is blue, and accordingly choose some basic things in this palette, it suits someone - the length , what will it be skirts, trousers can also be, of course, trousers, vests, in fact, there may be some elements, for example, a more classic top, and if you want to express fashion trends, that is, you can use classic ones - what are they, blouses, shirts, i think a white shirt , a classic white shirt should definitely be in the wardrobe, here is a classic white shirt today, this shirt is still oversized or a shirt that fits ? i don't think, that in size, for some reason, yes it seems to me, when the head is the right size, somehow

it looks already, fashionable, all the people ask me, well, that is, a shirt, if it’s a girl, she can take the shirt off her husband, well, maybe , look, it depends on the size of the husband, on the size of the husband, but i don’t even know, it seems to me that now they make excellent cuts for women’s cuts, i generally buy shirts in men’s stores, yes, it’s great here, but it seems to me they fit best for men, maybe i don’t wear white shirts, so i would argue with milana, not everyone, it seems to me that they don’t suit everyone. here you are, both representatives of a contrasting appearance, i think it’s good for you, but blue shirts, blue is great for me, i wear blue , i have all the shades, yes, really, that’s why you need to choose initially, but black, black, at one time i didn’t like it at all i wore it, i avoided it, but lately, since i work a lot in the theater, in the theater all the directors come out to the premiere in black, for some time i was the black sheep , that is, all the directors came out in black, and

they were the only one in blue or in beige. then i i realized that it would still be more stylish and more harmonious if i also had black color, so i started using it too, it turns out that i really love black color, well, black color can also be used, but in this style preppe or is it more like this, i think, these are light colors, i think that in such a consistent preppe style there is no black color, by the way, olga and i also agreed long ago that we use black color in films to the maximum, only in ...at a minimum, sorry because it doesn't look very good on on a camera, especially on a digital camera, on television it’s the same thing, we minimize, but black, i didn’t know that, but because it falls through and you can’t see the texture, in fact it turns out just a dark spot, yeah, if it ’s black, then it has texture indeed, that is , it is either leather or suede, or lace, or velvet, then it looks interesting, we are very glad to see you in black, yes, we are like

professionals. dressed in black and talked about it in disagreement, in general i agree that black is probably not the most advantageous color for me it seems more and some kind of beige, it’s brown, well, this is the style, schools, this is the style, as it seems to me , there is some kind of lawn in front of an american university and here we see people there in this idyllic picture, no one in black they won’t, everyone will be some kind of restrained , noble shades of old money, and what they are now. from every iron this is a trend for old money, i really like it when people who have never had money teach other people who have also never had money, but studying looks like they’re in the seventh generation there, no, just a word, i’m very associated with some kind of london, something like that - harvard, beautiful, some dark green ones like that

such, yes, dark green, by the way, yes this. this is so, it happened precisely from these. yes, this is also all from there, yes, but it’s beautiful, it seems to me that this is very, very true, the style originated initially, well, it is believed that it originated in america, but we know that the americans, they always wanted to look like look, europeans, who have a generation of aristocracy, they always wanted, so this style, like an imitation, yes, it originated there, well, i’m already looking forward to it, i want to watch the film, i’m very interested, yes, come

watch our film, which it's called, i'm taking a step, on september 7 it will be released nationwide in all cinemas of our beautiful country, thank you very much, we will wait impatiently, although no, the film is already showing in cinemas, it is already running, you can already go to the cinema, run already, let's go to the cinema, okay of course, we will be inspired by style. and i’m sure that we can learn a lot of interesting things from your images, yes , yes, thank you, thank you, this podcast is a must read, i’m aglyana baatnikova, my guest today... natalia ushey, musician, soloist group melnitsa, and we discuss the argentine writer jorge luis borgis, and his image of the world as in libraries.

natasha, hello, hello, uh, please tell me, somehow khilavisa, the melnitsa group, she’s probably associated with some kind of games, fantasies, maybe with lastelin of the rings, biowulf, sagas, then suddenly you choose the theme of borhis and it seems that this is unexpected, yes, but if you know you well, you are a candidate of philological sciences, a linguist, in general, the worlds of borhis, they conclude in imagine all possible plots, and please tell me about what you have in common with this writer , why you love him, i’ll tell you, yes, i ’ll tell you why i chose this particular writer for our meeting, you know, if i. .. chose some scandinavian studies or celtology, i would speak here as a professional in this topic, i would include a lecturer, such as natalya andreevna, a professor at the department, now we will talk about registers in irish sagas, blah blah blah, well, probably this is not very interesting for a podcast about

literature, so i decided that i probably want to be in this case not a specialist , not a teacher, but a professional reader, that is, this is what i personally am interested in reading, what makes me happy as... a reader in literature, especially since as you 're absolutely right, i don't literature, and especially i’m not a spanish scholar, i’m a linguist, therefore, just like in all kinds of medical systems, i say, hello, i’m natasha, i’m a professional patient, today i want to be a professional reader, but borhis himself was a professional reader, he somehow emphasizes this, in his essays, that his main role is to read, and this is exactly what is close to me, because until the end of his life he is absolutely in love with the process of reading, this is very visible, even in those essays that he i read it

when i was already completely blind, it’s very clear as far as he is concerned in general, in principle, with the very creation of the text, the relationship between text and language, since borhis was a polyglot, he is terribly interested in precisely this babylonian confusion of languages, which can be ordered in the pre-word hexagons of the babylonian library, somehow organized, or disorganized, remember, at he has an absolutely wonderful moment in one of the short stories, he remembers when the boys, when the books were closed for the night, he thought that the letters in them were scattered and mixed, he was very surprised that yes, yes, well, let's tell let the viewer know a little who borhis is, but in general terms, he is a writer who lived in argentina and wrote in spanish. although he knew many other languages, yes, he worked somewhere from the thirties to the eighties of the 10th century, lived a very long, fruitful, great life for a writer, and despite the fact that he became blind during his life, in general,

it would seem , this should have complicated his work, but no, he continued to work and created such wonderful worlds and images of a labyrinth or a world like a library, well , it’s interesting, he worked from a small form, this a person who has not written a single novel, although he was nominated many times for the nobel prize, i understand, and i understand him, because they also regularly ask me, natalya, why don’t you write a rock opera, i say: you know, i’m not my thing , large form, but not polish, this is not my topic, that is, even if i take on such a thing, i will express everything i want to say within the first two numbers, there are arias and characters, and then i will get bored, i’m done i'll give it up because borhis's prose is so rich, every story contains some terribly fascinating plot, a detective story, even a charade puzzle, they are terribly complex , these short stories of his, here we must definitely remember the writer whom borhis extremely loved and respected, this is, of course

, edgar allen paul, well, yes, then there is he largely relies on po, and also charades, yes, like the stolen letter and similar things, that is, borhis very much relies on po, but he continues this work, continues to bring this story to the absolute, like in the story about obenhakan who died in his own labyrinth, when it turns out that the killer is actually the murdered man, this one is lucky, very often in his uh, well , these charades, yes, puzzles, images are repeated, i even wanted to be with you talk about this story, the garden of forking paths, which is dedicated to a labyrinth, probably the most powerful of his stories and it is also in some way detective, because until the very last moment we do not understand for there is a murder, there is a murder and that’s all

time, that is, murder is not what it seems, with him this plot often goes through, that after reading this garden of forking paths, it finally worked out for me why borhis works with small forms, i realized that he himself created this labyrinth from text, that is, from short, repeating plots similar to each other, he created such a countless number , he creates a recursion, yes, he places mirrors in his labyrinth, ultimately making it endless, this is such a beautiful image and it is so applicable to absolutely everything , here we had a painting by maurice escher in our screensaver, well, it’s exactly the same thing, it’s just that escher is naturally visual, with him it happens in graphics, and with borhis it happens, here’s escher, yes, he’s really similar to the figurative world of borhis, that’s why we there are these yes, this one, this tape, this particular mobius motif of recursion repeating. and so on. borhis was a man of encyclopedic

memory. it seems to me that i know what his secret was, just judging by the fact that he uses this labyrinth, in the labyrinth he places some kind of hooks so that he you can’t get lost in this labyrinth, you know, he’s scattering crumbs, he’s scattering crumbs , yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, that is, he uses the classical technique of renaissance philosophy, this is a gnosiological technique, a technique of orders... consciousness, which is called the devil mind, it was invented by such a cool thinker of english origin, raymond luliy, and he came up with just such a system, ordering knowledge, ordering memory, ordering those facts that are not contained in the trash attic of sherlock holmes, exactly like borhis in the endless labyrinth, where each person has an essay dedicated specifically to this raymond lulu,

the logical one. habits, to get straight into this matter, that is, but when, when you really suddenly begin to understand, you understand how simple it is, how simple it is, that is, i use the palace of the mind, i have it , it’s quite strange, but there are also hooks there, they are mostly visual, that is, a certain image that refers... to another image, to another image, to another image, just like, uh, in borhis’s concept of bondage, why is he interested in bondage at all, yes, this is a very important topic, for him kabbalah constantly appears in him and taught it, yes, yes, it is interesting to him, again, too, as a tool ordering, as a tool for studying the knowledge of language, that is, this very concept, the pentateuch: as one giant, stretched out and expanded in all

variants, the name of god, and the tree, yes, the sepherod tree, yes, the sepherod tree, which, in general, i really love this concept because it can be applied to any spiral or, well, the spiral structure, from dante’s circles of hell to the dna spiral, you know, it seems to me that she specially came with a ring in the shape of a torus, the ring is beautiful. magical, that is, exactly the book of books, that is, the archetype of the book , enclosed in a ring, borhis has, there is a game, and it seems to me that the game is also important for you, in your work. this can be traced, but this is a kind of play of meanings, a play of symbols, a play on words, a very important image, when the whole is no more than its component parts, that is, when in one there is a multitude, in a certain unity, yes, but this unity is no more than each of the component parts

, that is, the fact that this is connected precisely with his love for small forms, precisely the fact that he must contain all these component parts, contain them very much. .. laconic form, and you know what’s interesting is this concept of the game, which he, of course, always has, we see how he gets a kick out of it, just like that, how he takes his labyrinth of such a hob and turns it over, yes, here ’s the wrong side, and he’s like wow, how cool everything is, and we know writers who continue to follow the behests of jorge our luis and who succeed, this is umberta eco, of course, and what kind of relationship did they have? i don’t know if they were connected in real life, but they knew each other without a doubt, that is, without a doubt they knew, and you see, this turns out to be an absolutely wonderful writer’s greetings, i adore umbert eco for this, that he is in the name of rose, this monstrous blind

villain appears before him, the librarian, the monk jorge, who denies the existence and rights to exist of aristotle’s book on comedy. because of what is happening, you think that this is a character written by borhis, a clear hint, and a library, but if we dig further, we understand that in this way umberta eco takes off her beautiful italian hat and says hello to borhis, because here of course, behind borhis is his character overoes, who writes a treatise in medieval cordoba and he encounters, well , an arab doctor, teacher, philosopher, he encounters just... the concepts of tragedy and comedy and he does not understand them, poor fellow, that is, in general i was looking for everything borhis has no sense of humor, no, i think that he just, in such a crooked way, just showed that he really appreciates borhis's play, and that thus, in general, overoes, whom borhis sees in the mirror in which he continues to believe, at some point he will understand what

comedy is, but in the monastery of uberta eco, the library burns, burns and the manuscript, the monk orge himself burns. well, this is a separate story, if the world is a library, then our work there is probably manuscripts for we don’t know whether this will become a book, whether it will be included in the world library, yes, these manuscripts are burning, i, as a convinced neoplatanian, believe that the manuscripts are burning, but of course there remain shadows on the walls of the cave, that is , our work is for eternity, and the manuscripts are burning, no matter what woland says bulgakova, well

, let's listen to the song the manuscript of the mill. now is the time of fire, don’t let me in, i’m like a rusty ascetic, 3,000 years old, who hasn’t written poetry, but... the invisible one is waiting, careful like a cat, touching the milk, oh, the midnight double, he leaned towards the lamp, according to my rules, with a log my, a short beast walks, where i keep this sacrifice to the fire, until the door closes, the circles are burning, they didn’t tell you, but they really are burning, and don’t change to check back, oh my friends,

oh my enemies, how beautiful it is to cut a vein with a feather , the evening is not... silver, the manuscripts are not burning, they are still burning, you should have seen this act, the manuscripts say, they didn’t tell you, but they really say, and don’t change ours back, oh my friends, oh my enemies, how beautiful. they burn, manuscripts burn, then they are gloriously loved. like a ripe pomegranate, my friends, ah

my enemies, how beautifully they burn, the manuscript is burning, y'. this podcast is a must-read, i'm glana batnikova, my guest is natalia ushey , musician, lead singer of the melnitsa group, candidate of philological sciences, we're talking about jorge luis borgis, you know, borgis, he is exactly, in my opinion, that's... as a collagist, that is, he takes some of these caresses of short forms, he knows mythology wonderfully, knows a variety

of subjects wonderfully, it’s clear that a person has been reading all his life, but he didn’t have an active life, all life passed in books, yes, but he actually was also the director of the national library, yes, that is, he is a professional librarian, a great librarian, you can say that , he is my such archetypal library, it seems to me that he gave birth to many waves after himself. .. umbert eco, who succeeds, yes, he has this game , it works because you can fold a tender blanket until you lose your pulse, but until you have some kind of magic thread, it will not become magical, it won't magic carpet, that is, let’s say paolo coelho, who can be considered borgis’s epigote, he doesn’t succeed at all. listen, he even took the title of a story by the very famous aleph, and wrote a novel that is graphic novel, yes, yes,

but this is epigonism, in the worst sense, to be honest, but you know, i read this novel, pavlakalia aleph, because it it mentions my friend, in general, on this trip to russia he meets a girl who is the prototype, which was my friend, so i had to read it, although i’m not very i love kaeli, but i’m his in general, i’m his in general. and then i read the original source, borhis’s own story, where everything is much more complicated, that is, this is a man who finds himself at the point where all time lines converge, it’s much more complicated, here you understand, we can say that borhis is a creative writer who exists ... in the four-dimensional world, that he not only has our three dimensions , but he also has time, that is, he

operates with time here and there, which is why he has this here crossroads, the garden of forking paths, there mentioned, there is this chinese descendant, the author of the labyrinth, he comes to this sinologist doctor who is studying the heritage of his great-grandfather. it turns out that the book and the labyrinth are one and the same thing, yes, that is, he created labyrinths and created a book, it turned out that they are one and the same thing, and it’s very interesting there, uh, this doctor asks him a question, and he asks this chinese , yes, this descendant, what word in charade should not be mentioned in a charade, in a charade about chess the word chess should not be mentioned, and he says, i found the key, the labyrinth of your great-grandfather, that the word time is not mentioned there, this means that the entire labyrinth is dedicated to time and its various layers, that is, there is actually this

key there, orchis wrote to his, yes, that is, it’s just like the tetragramaton on the golem’s forehead , yes, for the golem to work, he talks about this in the esab in his lecture about kabla , for the golem to work, it must have the correctly chosen word, and if , accordingly, the tzaddik erases one of the letters of this word from the golem’s forehead: it will turn into another, like the word emet, truth turns into meth, that is, death, and the golem crumbles to dust, that is, control over the golem is also in the right word and the right letters , it is this opportunity to work with letters back and forth, that is, write, erase, write, erase, this is absolutely what - it seems to me that the amazing unlimited control over dead matter that the jewish gains, it seems to me that - for borhis the text is living matter, yes, yes, of course , of course, and, uh, in no case static,

constantly changing, because that the interpretation of the text... even though that its literal image can be fixed, but the interpretation of the text will be different in different centuries, for us now superstructures are taking place, that from the height of our cordova-educated postmodern slaves, and from the height of postmodernity, that is, we have a third, fourth, sixth superstructure all these additional meanings, additional emotions that we invest not only in relation to the text, but in relation to the author who wrote... just this postmodern time, tu-tu-tu-tu-tu-tu- tut-tut-tut, and just like that it turns out to be the next steps in one of the stairs of the labyrinth borhis, it seems to me, influenced castaneda, but because in general the form itself , you know, i want to mention that, mm, when borhis began to work, it was an innovative form, what in cinema is called macumentary, that is, it is a documentary film, but it is completely imitated, that is

, in fact, it is an artistically created space that imitates documentary. this documentary that borhis imitates is absolutely magnificent, yes, that is, we don’t understand, it was whether this really is true, whether all these people who are talking really existed , maybe these are philosophers who are talking or is this a product of his consciousness, we don’t understand this, but it ’s a great imitator, but every story has a commentary, here’s one of these you don’t understand the comments, really, he thought all this, or yes, or he really tells the stories of his own life, slightly flavored with this. well, costaneda has this form of documentation and conversations with the magician himself i think he obviously took this form from borhis, and i, you know, i recently read orchal’s philosophy of orchal, and there is a lot of mention there of such an image as a mirror, that orchal

loves a space in which there are a lot of mirrors, and a mirror is very important. borhis has a theme, that is, even in a labyrinth, a person eventually comes to a mirror, that is, if he goes through a labyrinth, he comes to a mirror and meets himself, and an overoste that looks in the mirror and disappears, and maybe even the bodalqueer has disappeared, that's all that as if when he begins to understand the essence of things, he disappears from the mirror, tell me, natasha, what do you think, that borhis went blind during his life, it is clear that he read a lot and he even writes himself that i actually didn't live. yes, i don’t know what was happening there in my country, because i spent all my time in the library, i spent all my time in books, but tell me, this fact that a person becomes blind, yes, finds himself in this world of darkness, then there is some kind of forced disability, that's what you think, did this affect borhis, because i have the feeling that his works have become stronger, which he wrote already

in the seventies, there they became more lyrical and specifically introverted, he works in a short form, but he has very deep details, that is, for example, he writes , that a man who is still approaching the sea, he has not yet seen this sea, but this sea is already splashing in his blood, this is a very accurate observation, here is the image of the sea, and the notorious platonic shadow, that is, you understand, a blind man, he has direct access to plato's cave with shadows, yes, he doesn’t work with the visual, he works with archetypes, with ideas, with eides. yes things, images of concepts, he works directly, but let’s talk more about this babylonian library, as you imagine it, in this world he is a library, he is a systematizer, or he is a reader, or as you see it, that is, this world of hexagonal shelves, describe it, how you feel it, you know, a hexagon, a hexagon - this is a honeycomb, that is, this is such a hive, that’s why

i have bees in my ears today, this too, this too it’s not without reason, you’re all in signs, i’m all in signs, are you, of course, if we talk about orchis, then you need to operate with its tools, that is, operate with signs, yeah, so of course, i’m all in signs, essentially babylon, him, this babylonian library is really a gigantic hive, that is, i can imagine that just as bees have an extremely complex hierarchy of creatures, that is, in the world of borhis's library there should also be a completely phantasmagoric hierarchy, and i think that he. .. v first of all, the reader, an enthusiastic reader who rushes through these honeycombs, from hexagon to hexagon finds something interesting for himself, and it seems to me that in order to become a librarian of the babylonian library, you need to go a very long way, you need to go through initiation, you need to go through, yes, you need to enter some kind of liminal phase, and go through initiation, that is, find this notorious

tetragramaton or at least its semblance, that is, jump to another step. yeah, development and then these are in front of you the hexagons will be ordered, open and become permeable. borhis in a story, well, i don’t even know, it’s probably... or maybe a story, four cycles, and he’s just trying to systematize, maybe all his knowledge, endless, he gives a theory that there are only four plot in world literature and we all repeat them endlessly, this is the plot of the capture of a fortress, for example, the iliad, yes, and the return home, well, the example is also the classic odysseus, who returns to... and the search is probably a broader concept, but it leads there an example of the bird simurgh, which is at the same time many birds and one bird, which contains this

many, and in general this is also an image of god, and for which any ancient stories, well, ancient epic literature, travel - this is all just a search, and the suicide of god, and the sacrifice of god, yes. myths, yes, that is, like a horse sacrifice , that is, the ashwadha ritual, which accompanies the ascension of a king to the throne, that is, the sacrifice of a divine being is just the most initiatory thing, of all these wandering plots that remind us that a leap to a new level is a sacrifice to god, uh-huh, there’s this one again, what’s his name? benhokan in his small labyrinth is that the killer of obenhakan becomes abenhokan himself , yes, that is, he is a game, that the one who is killed, he was actually the creator of this whole

murder imitator, that is, borhis has a very plot there, and this is, as it were, an initiation thought out and influenced by the agent himself, that is, he sacrifices himself , this is also such an odic thing, yes, how to hang yourself, uh-huh, well, again, this is a wandering plot, so the scandinavians wanted to hold on , it didn’t work out, this podcast is a must- read, i’m ogladnikova, my guest is natalya oshey, musician, lead singer of the melnitsa group, candidate of philological sciences, we are talking about jorge luis borgis. natasha, as for borhis’s personal life, i am very touched. ulric's story, from the book of sand, from the collection the book of sand, where he meets a woman, they spend only one night together, there is also an obvious allusion to mythology, there is a hero

name is sigurt, and he’s siekfried, that is, this all relates to scandinavian mythology, and the heroine’s name is ulrika, but on the one hand it looks simple, like people who met in a hotel, spent the night together, and the next morning separated forever, but this one here oneight stand, and norhis represents such a failure into some other world, as if this meeting was very important, and it seems very romantic to me, it also plays the role of a mirror, it looks like a mirror, i say, now we are all- not yet refrained from scandinavian studies, because precisely the fact that his hero is siegfred sigurt is very important, because of course borhis, with his amazing erudition, he knew what a certain non-meeting with a woman means for a scandinavian hero, because a woman, for the scandinavians, in general, in mythology, this is fate, a woman is capable of changing fate, so it’s this

mysterious ulrika who meets with sigurd, she makes him look at himself from a completely different level, what is it about? you say, this is initiation, this is a meeting, there is initiation precisely, that is, it is a kind of ananka, you know, which is through a tiny... because initiation is always a small death, an imitation of death, it forces him to move on to another level, that is, here i really love borhis so much in such aspects as an indo-europeanist, because he, of course, is a bearer of indo-european culture, and yes, yes, yes, and he feels these very indo-european mythological clichés very subtly, maybe not always be conscious of course, because it’s directly mine , you know, when i see this sacrifice of the king and... this woman’s fate, i think, you ’re my good one, how nice, let’s talk about his personal life, he’s been around all his life one might say, lonely, that is, there are some women, i see dedication to women in different

stories, different women, that is , there were women, they inspired, but basically, yes, he lived his life rather with his family, there with his mother, especially he went blind, but at the end of his life , after his mother died, when his mother let him go, yes, this freudian story, he married his own. some beautiful girl, that’s what you think, his relationships with women are so strange, they were somehow reflected in his prose, how can i tell you? in my opinion, he is not a love author at all, no, he is not a love author at all, that is, for him, rather, all the women are in prose, but then in the same aleph, yes, this is his beloved, she is already dead at the beginning, beatrice , yes, beatrice, this is viterbo, that is, in principle, he has women in his stories, they appear as ideas rather, oh, this is very interesting, yes, that is, this is exactly the archetype of a dead lover, this is beatrice, with some of her countless past lovers, or this is... ulrika and the woman of fate who

guides the hero through initiation, that is, it seems to me that all his female characters, yes, that all his female characters are not endowed with special emotionality, but endowed with power, endowed with a function, yes, endowed with a temporary, function, as it were, which is obliged to lead the hero to that point in time space in which borhis wants to see this hero, he never received the nobel prize, this is very disappointing, i read that 25 times, almost very many times, he was nominated, and each time he did not receive, marquez all the time marquez bypassed at the turn, bypassed, although i also love marquez very much, yes, but i like borgis precisely because he gave birth to so many, that is, he seems to be a quiet librarian, you know, quietly, quietly, but he introduced very much. i

later introduced many concepts into popular culture, because i read him, i i also see murakkami with the chronicles of a wind-up bird, where people fall into a certain corridor, and there is another time, there is a 1979 novel by christiane kracht, where people end up in iran during the revolution and are saved by finding themselves in some magical slice of time, too, another, and they do some rituals, eat black food there, in general borhis has this, he gives some programs, like quantity, yes, right now i’m reading alan moore’s absolutely gigantic novel jerusalem and here he also has alan moore, you know, this is exactly the system, the principle the wrong side, the principle of mirrors, and the principle of traveling back and forth in time, that is, in essence, jerusalem is a deconstruction of a family saga, an english, such a classic, family saga, but each chapter

takes place in its own time, it is nonlinear, and periodically due to the penetration into the conventional underbelly of the city of northampton, characters of the same family from different times have the opportunity to meet each other, and this, of course , is just such borhisianism, here it is stretched out into a book, what is called longer than the bible, that is, of course, i would cut this jerusalem in half, but allan murph introduces these cool four principles of four-dimensional space, where time is the most fascinating scale, in a very exciting way. i have a question for you as a linguist, it’s actually funny, but there’s something in it. here is borhis, he somehow entered the life of a russian person with this joke. what do you think borhis has gone wrong with? borgisa pereborghis, well, you are a linguist, i don’t know who else to ask, but it seems to me that you can there may be some answer to this question.

for some reason, here's borhis. remained in the layer of such a comic language, well, because because because, in principle, the very name borhis in the russian language evokes some kind of inner isidore of seville with folk etymologies, you know, this is the root boron, that is , take, take, and so on, i really want to continue to etymology it, that is, there are such unfortunate surnames that, on the contrary , successful ones appeal to folk etymology, you can work with them, it’s a game, you understand, he again penetrated into the linguistic game. yes, yes, well, of course, of course, that is, the fact that even the author’s surname is fixed in the body of another language, in the fabric of another language, begins to spread there, like some beautiful noxious weed, amazing of argentine origin, so it begins to sprout in the fabric of the labyrinth of the russian language already , well, you see how interesting you and i found, what a move, linguistic, indeed, something that explains something about borhis and his... his