[000:00:00;00] the surname borhis itself in the russian language evokes some kind of inner isidore of seville with folk etymologies, you know, this is the root bor, that is, take, take, and so on, i really want to continue to lagize it, that is, there are such unsuccessful surnames that, on the contrary, are successful , they appeal to folk etymology, you can work with them, you understand, he again penetrated into the linguistic game, so he was still a magician, yes , of course, of course, that is, the fact that even the author’s surname is fixed: in the body of another language, in the fabric of another language, it begins to spread there, like some beautiful noxious weed, amazing of argentine origin, so it begins to grow in the fabric of the labyrinth of the russian language already, well , you see how interesting it is that you and i found what kind of , uh, linguistic move, indeed, something explaining about borhis and his immortality, his mind games, yes, he is immortal, because he is constantly repeated in the works

of other people. yes, that is, his platonic shadows continue to play on the walls of the cave, continues to live, yes, the labyrinth continues live, he is infinite, the recursion of mirrors is infinite, borgis is alive, cool, natasha, thank you for the interesting conversation , i learned a lot, you are a resource, it’s always interesting to listen to you, and it was very interesting, that’s how you see such a writer as jorge luis borgis , very unusual, thank you for inviting me, i really like talking about books. this was a must -read podcast, i am agla and batnikov, my guest was natalya oshey, musician, candidate of philological sciences, soloist of the group melnitsa, also known as helovisa, thank you, you can find all episodes of the podcast as a must-read on the website of the first

channel 1tv.ru. well, today nicholas ii is a rather controversial figure, even for convinced monarchists, because many criticized nicholas for leaving his post, deserting the post of god’s anointed, and even more so for others, especially after the revolution, so controversial a figure, in soviet times they called the bloody nicholas, now mainly nicholas the martyrs, so there is something to deal with, in general, the personality is really interesting, and quite often you can hear the point of view according to which russian revolutions are a consequence of weakness of will, weak character , mistakes made by nicholas ii, now if it weren’t for nicholas, there would have been someone else in this place, at least alexander ii , then it

is possible. that’s what he said in particular, we’ll probably figure it out, hello, this is a historical podcast, russia and the west are on the swing of history, pyotr romanov and sergei solovyov are with you, we’ll look into the fate of the last russian emperor, interesting, remember about the upbringing of nicholas, because in general, a lot is laid naturally in youth, some main traits, they tried to bring up, in general, all the main historical figures, so to speak, nicholas, let’s say , raised alexander ii, physical activity, preparation, education of such men, you can’t complain, and so on, such a very tough upbringing, alexander ii did the same with his son, the same

method was used in raising nicholas ii. came out a really very strong formal person, physically very strong, physically strong, to say that he spun the sun on the horizontal bar, he was a good rower, but in order to govern , especially a country like russia, spinning the sun is not enough, and not even necessary, and not even necessary, it is irrelevant, but for teachers so to speak, life, especially politics. philosophy and so on, he had a well-known conservative victorious, who was his father’s teacher, to what extent this upbringing actually reflected on the figure with nikolai, so to speak, is difficult to say, because when the same victorious they asked what his students, so to speak, first alexander ii, then nicholas, he shrugged, he didn’t know, in general, what had reached, what had not, if we talk about

education, then all... still nikolai definitely learned one thing from pobedonostsev, and not only from pobedonostsev, from the entire russian context, this is that it is necessary to protect the beginning of an unshakable autocracy and his well-known reservation in the coronation speech, when he had already become emperor, he called the dream of parliament meaningless, in the 1897 census, aka also filled out the corresponding form, so in the class graph he wrote the owner of the russian land, this is exactly how he felt until the very end of his reign, the owner of the russian land, that’s how adequate this was to the reality of that time, this is a big question, the very beginning of it is interesting... all his predecessors generally came with some fairly definite program, well, not a plan, maybe specific actions, but