[000:00:00;00] he says, we haven’t read it, but we are very indignant, uh, the indignation, in general , it didn’t concern what you actually said, the indignation concerned the fact that you created in them the feeling that that serene bright future that they are very i wanted to see, and for this it did not even require victory by a special operation, for this it was enough, well, to somehow come to an agreement with the west. and all this nightmarish sunshine of the point of view would end. and at first it seemed that you were all alone, but in general it soon became clear that you were not one. these people absolutely did not understand, it seems to me, your dialogue with president putin at the valdai forum. they heard that in response to your question, the russian president said that

he does not see. change the russian nuclear doctrine, they did not pay attention to one word , which, as it seemed to me, was central, he did not see the need today, today to change the russian nuclear doctrine, and after that, in his answer to you, he added that russia will withdraw from the treaty banning nuclear testing, which the united states has not ratified, russia ratified, that is, in fact, the president made it clear that maybe he did not completely agree with everything that you said, but in general, his own analysis, if you like, his own intuition was in the direction in which you spoke and don't you think so? i'm not ready to speak for the president,

i - i spoke. about what i saw and heard with my own eyes, i look at real politics and i see that in real politics everything is going exactly as it should go from my point of view, and the missiles were placed in belarus, several more steps were taken, which i will not name so as not to cause a scandal, but they are completely obvious, uh, on the stairs. uh non-nuclear escalation, but some statements were made there, finally, these exercises were held, which of course were planned, but which are completely obvious, i think that this is not the last but a movement, i hope, other things it was a clear demonstration, really, yes, this is completely understandable, if we take into account the theoretical ladder, then four steps have already been completed, and

out of the five that were the first, but from my point of view point of view, but this does not mean that i am dictating something there, i am just analytically, thinking, and it seems to me that the situation has begun to change, since american colleagues have calmed down a little, regarding, firstly, the denial that russia can launch a nuclear strike, it has almost happened in the last few weeks or months, almost, this is the first, on the contrary, a large number of articles have appeared that say that this is... possible and that we need to think about it, this is the first, secondly, there, i think, a reassessment of politics in america began, but it’s hard to say, because whether this is real or not, because in my next article , which is much tougher than the first, it was also published in september, i wrote that what

worries me most is that the american leaders, including the president and the secretary of state, this ... i really found it absolutely terrifying, i think that climate change is worse than a nuclear war, or at least as terrible, this is nonsense, but this nonsense causes horror, but since then since then uh like that the statements were not repeated, although they were said they raise doubts about what we have in america, where is it going? in the following articles, in this article i wrote that we need to act now, and of course, without launching a nuclear strike if possible, because for now , in any case, the american deep state has decided that it does not dare to replace absolutely incompetent leaders, in my second article , i'm just calling on this deep state to come to their senses, let's listen to what

state secretary antony blinken said just recently about two tasks from his point of view, two tasks of us foreign policy in relations with russia. himself. before president biden's first day, there were two guiding stars, one was to make sure we were doing everything we could to support ukraine and get other countries involved, and the other was to avoid a direct clash with russia, as such a conflict could potentially lead to , which no one wants, and which could be bad for the safety of americans, so following these guiding stars is in my opinion, a central aspect of how president biden approaches certain issues. and in following these two stars, i had the feeling that the biden administration was increasingly developing a permissiveness complex, that the united states could go for a unilateral

escalation, counting on the fact that russia would not dare or would not be able to respond. this was one of the reasons why you decided to make your call for what i call a new nuclear realism. yes, further, i continued this line, i know that some very high-ranking american experts, very high-ranking ones, threatened - russia in response to the possible use of nuclear weapons with a massive strike by conventional forces, which supposedly could destroy the russian armed forces that are fighting - on the fields of ukraine, i. .. wrote in this article that then in the second article, that then a second, second wave of united blows will follow, but this is a game, a conscientious, but very significant game, and if

it does not stop further, then a blow will be struck here american bases, of which there are 100 times more, or even 200 times more in america than in russia, foreign, tens of thousands of americans will die, i think that this - this argument has been heard, i hope that these threats of mine will be empty , and god forbid that we ever make this kind of threat, because - along with the american soldiers whom i wish to die, innocent people will die, but these innocent people are already dying in the thousands, millions in iraq, and now in ukraine, all we're talking about what's out there half a million or 400,000, we don’t know how many ukrainian soldiers died, how many civilians have already died from absence, who live in war conditions, we even no one ever writes about them anywhere, this is a war

that the west unleashed, and which, therefore, , needs to be stopped, and which needs to be stopped, including by moving up the escalation ladder, we are now having a discussion about what could be... it is worth winning the war, which we will definitely win in any case and completely defeat the ukrainian regime, with conventional forces , i think that it will cost too much, i feel sorry for the resources and most importantly for our people, however, i feel sorry even for the ukrainians who were deceived, i think that we will have to go up the ladder of nuclear escalation, i hope that our american partners, opponents, whoever they are, will come to their senses, will finally come to their senses... i repeat, that same deep state, they put highly incompetent and irresponsible ideological people at the head of the american administration, do you agree

that the irresponsible use of force can be provocative, but an irresponsible refusal to use force can also be provocative and can, if you want, provoke precisely your own... weakness or what looks like weakness, therefore, if you really want to avoid war, then it is very important that the enemy took you seriously, i completely agree with you, but i do not retract my words, albeit spoken polemically, that we have a careless nuclear doctrine, which is intended for other times and which was written... apparently with caution on that in order to please someone, unknown to whom, by the way, it is completely meaningless, from the point of view of real nuclear policy, because again, i am writing this in

the second article, in the second article, the doctrine, or the idea that a nuclear limited nuclear war, will inevitably lead to a general nuclear war, this is a myth. and a myth created by people of good will, including me, who wanted to precipitate any war in this way, but any such war was unleashed, and in this sense we... acted frivolously, now you have to cut yourself off and cut off others, behave much more harshly, it would be better to do this earlier, well , it seems to me that frivolous compliance leads to trouble, i will never forget the phrase in the memoirs of gorbachev’s assistant anatoly chernyaev, where he explained that they just thought it was bad form to turn to the secretary of state...

“let’s put all our obligations, mutual obligations, including those not expanding nato, on paper,” chernyaev wrote, but that would show that we don’t trust them, this is for him it seemed, well, it was just not only dangerous, but disgusting, he said, this would be contrary to new thinking, we believed that they...” conditional they are the same as us, that is, just as good, i didn’t think so, in those years, but i was one of the very rare people who criticized gorbachev quite harshly for his policies, including in the nuclear field, so you said that the use of weapons, that this must necessarily lead to a global catastrophe, that this is a myth,

why do you think so? well, first of all, i don’t i know, that’s why i wouldn’t want to check my own statements, god forbid, but when you hear that this will definitely lead, this is absolute stupidity, firstly, because real doctrines of the use of nuclear weapons, even written ones, especially american ones, provide for , a lot, stepwise nuclear escalation, and i strongly suspect that our policy is the same, well, a little different, it needs to be changed, by the way, we also need to think about how deterrence should work in the nuclear era, that is the real doctrines are different, but i repeat, i don’t want to open the road to hell, because

after all, uh, we don’t know what will happen when a certain rubicon is translated, we spoke very clearly about the moral side of this situation and that this moral country is for you very important, yes, but i also think about the moral, and i wrote and spoke about this, and it’s absolutely moral to turn a blind eye in a situation when the world... is confidently sliding towards the third world war, confidently, i believe that if we don’t if we stop this slide, it will happen within 10 years, this is absolutely i have a strong feeling, which is why i insist on my position, i think that it is shared by more and more people, i am sure of this, i know this, in ukraine the ukrainian offensive has failed. this is not only said in moscow, it is not only said in

washington and new york, in general it is even beginning to be recognized in kiev. if this is so, then why do you think that the world is sliding towards the third world war, it would seem that russia is moving towards victory in ukraine, and even when - russia will win in ukraine, and it can only win, by the way, really. to resistance, because not only it is necessary to destroy, demilitarize and denazify ukraine, there will still be pockets in the west, but the most important thing is that fundamental changes have begun in the foundation of the world, crises similar to the current israeli one, they were absolutely predictable, there will be a lot of them, i can name a dozen more points where... almost certainly within a few years,

name one or two for example, india-pakistan, saudi arabia, new nuclear powers will appear, at least three in within 10 years, almost certainly, we just need to insert the fuse that was there, and this fuse, which prevented us from sliding into a general war for 70 years, was the fear of nuclear armament, it was gone, it needs to be returned, but systemically the situation is heading, of course, towards a third world war, due to the many crises that are growing. despite the fact that we are europeans, you are also partial europeans, as it comes from russia, but we must admit that it was from our continent that everything came from the very

terrible threat to humanity, war. russia has on the battlefield, they did not come automatically, i hope you agreed with this, this required a serious reorganization of the armed forces, including the attraction of new senior command personnel, this required a serious organization of the defense industry, where very large success. but russian diplomacy also spoke in a new, more confident tone. to what extent, to what extent are these changes, from my point of view, constructive and necessary, they also covered the russian export

community, so let me want you to listen to what a person you know well, the director of the institute of asian and african countries at moscow state university, said about this. let's listen. i will say an interesting thing that strikes me: during vladimir putin’s speech, the audience in the audience was mostly people who had long advocated a march to the west, who were from the pro-western wing. it can be stated that in our country the expert elite has not changed, which in a good sense should serve the orientation russian politics. and this is a very bad sign. the russian president says this for a reason, but it turns out that he is saying this for the wrong reasons. that's what, frankly, worries me: the president's thoughts are very clearly structured. an obvious turn in the asian direction, let’s say, in the non-western direction. but china can observe that the people who are sitting in the hall are the same people who worked with the west before. therefore, the chinese have a natural fear, if they are so unprincipled, when the pendulum again swings towards the west, it turns out that

china, india and other asian states will again be left alone. like you, alexey maslov, but what is called. is not afraid to speak brightly and prominently, but it seems to me that , as in your case, he is talking about something serious and real, your point of view, well, i’m not commenting on the opinion of his colleagues, but this is the opinion that he expressed publicly, and so i ’m not commenting further, it’s not a royal matter, but this is the first second, really, but we are undergoing a rethinking, i... this is very i am glad, i am considered the father of the first eastern turn of russia, which began at the end of 2000, now we are advocating for a serious siberian turn of russia, for a shift in the center of spiritual, economic and political russia, to the urals beyond the urals, it will be necessary to build

a third capital, of course, this will happen over the next 10-15 years, i'm sure of it, i really like it. uh, not what is happening in the expert community, it still lags far behind the realities, naturally, because it is tied to old realities, this military operation, or war, no matter what you call it, leads to magnificent, powerful, although , unfortunately, expensive changes in russian society. we are becoming a people, much more so. the elite really began to change both mentally and physically, and it will change increasingly, because people who went through this war and will come to leadership positions, have already begun to come to leadership positions in the regions, and then in the center, there will be

a change, there will be change of elites, it went, and i i really like this process, war to this is a terrible thing, but this war was necessary , unfortunately, also for the restructuring of our consciousness and for the restructuring of our society, we finally abandoned the absolutely ridiculous illusions that the west will help us, and from the absolute idiotic focus on complete integration with the west, which came from ignorance of this very west. you probably remember, there was such a person, rahm emmanuel, of course, who was even the chief of staff of the white house at one time, and then he became mayor of chicago.

he had a favorite expression that it was impossible to allow at least some crisis not to be used for the necessary state purposes, so when i looked at your dialogue with president putin at the valdai forum, i was struck by the extent to which you said that is happening now with optimism because many people, especially in the globalist elite. this is what you said, the satisfied expression on your face, your smile, for them it must have been a shock, because they have nightmares, and even during the day they have nightmares, they have a feeling, not even that something terrible is happening, but not a feeling of some very great guilt, it’s unclear why, and so i had the feeling that you see, looking at the current situation, that you see the possibility of

some kind of... something new, very essentially new, a future for russia and which will not come automatically, which needs to be built, but which is real, they expressed what i think, so i completely agree with you , i will remind you of the things that we once they said that this war is leading to the washing away of westernism, we have completed the western voyage, at the same time, we retain in ourselves the best that we received from europe, great culture , or great literature, maybe the greatest in the world, i sound like a chauvinist, and we, this is the first thing, westerners either leave or rebuild, you just

escaped, second, we knock out, or rather, with the help of the fact that we caused fire on ourselves, we embroider the comprador class, and the comprador elite, intellectual and economic, due to the rather unsuccessful reforms of the nineties, we created conditions when people were forced take money abroad, and partially leave it there, such... these were idiotic reforms, but what to do? that was the story, we were ignoramuses, so these camparoda elite are also being kicked out and the gamdar mentality is being kicked out, i really like what is happening, finally we got involved in mechanical engineering and finally we started investing in science again, three factors, happening at the same time and very quickly , too slowly, of course, it seems to me, but maybe that’s why... i think we’re in no hurry with

nuclear escalation, we hope to win this war, the west, without using, of course, terrible measures, but themselves, or the worst in themselves, it’s in themselves, it’s happening, sergius alexander, thank you very much, what’s happening now from my point of view is a serious tragedy . but this is also an optimistic tragedy, and you showed today that this optimism , that it is not built on illusions, on real opportunities, if you only know how to take advantage of these opportunities, your last word, i knew that there would be a war, i have been saying for 25 years, i wanted us to issue ultimatums and even we started military operations earlier, but we started them now with some delay. but better late than never, now i feel myself and the country in myself, in a much better

position than 5, 10, 15, 20 years ago. thank you very much for this important and interesting conversation, i hope your optimism turns out to be justified. me too, it was a big game, blame the advertising. we'll be back in just a few minutes. khrushchov and kennedy found the strength to show responsibility and wisdom. deployment of american jupiter missiles in turkey radically changed the entire balance of power. this is what marked the beginning of the cuban missile crisis, in contrast to western historiography, which they are trying to present as the root of the problem of placing our missiles in cuba. in cuba we were responding to what the united states had already done near the soviet union. the united states posed a military threat to the security of the ussr. many were horrified,

realizing how much the world hung on vlaska. they understood. that the war is not even one step, but half a step. and now we are talking about creating immediate threats to our security right on our borders. the world is on the edge. lessons from the cuban missile crisis. on saturday, on the first. a big game is on the air, washington has finally ended the epic with the election of the speaker of the house of representatives, on the fourth attempt

one of the candidates managed to become speaker . american observers write that he achieved victory in a very simple way, unlike his previous colleagues who were blocked. mile johnson, a congressman who was elected to his fourth term, that is, a relatively new congressman, he himself showed nothing. neither for good nor for bad, he was so friendly, smiling, but completely inconspicuous, well, probably this helped him, sometimes this kind of invisibility leads to the success of politics, on the other hand, to be a successful speaker of the house, he will be required other qualities and

great energy, and i’m not even afraid to say, more... now with us from washington is the correspondent of a businessman in the united states , our regular participant ekaterina moore. ekaterina, we welcome you, we are very glad to see you see, thanks for taking the time. so i see you smiling, are you and the american people happy that they have finally elected a speaker? well, judging by johnson’s inaugural speech yesterday, he... offered very interesting prospects for the americans, in principle he promised what the americans expected from him, but he was very balanced, and the man has a very well -developed speech, but unexpectedly, he but apparently, apparently, his career gives, lets you know, he is, as far as i remember, he also worked on

the radio, and, in principle, everyone loves him absolutely right. they said, plus everything, but he really hasn’t been involved in any scandals, and well, we should hope that there will be some kind of consolidation of society; in principle, before november 17, there are chances that he will be in time and will pass the american budget, and that america will reach this date without any shocks, so yes, this is probably a positive shift, but it’s really one of the negative points that analysts pay attention to, is that he doesn’t have much, ah, background, yes, of some kind, the fact that he has experience in political battles, and he is small, but there is an opinion that, despite his deviation from the law and his friendship with donald trump, he will

still have to rely on steve scalise. who is also from louisiana, they worked very well as a pair yesterday, if you look at how they introduced each other and what remarks they exchanged, so i think that steve scalise, who lost as a post-speaker, he can become such a gray eminence, a conservative who stands in the center, in principle, he can very actively influence johnson’s position, well the difference between johnson and scolis is that he had been in the house of representatives for many years, held leading positions , so to speak, was seduced by washington, became corrupted in washington, lost, so to speak, his pristine purity, i am the district from which johnson was elected, i know him a little, i

had friends there and they gave me a hat many years ago. on which the following was literally written: on top it was written: the year of gays in america, hans. god gave america weapons, freedom, and courage, and then there was it is said, let's keep paul, let's preserve all these american qualities, freedoms and so on, these are very different people than those people who live in washington, and not only from the point of view of politics, but also in their general outlook on life, if you want , with a more natural smile, more committed not only to their country, but to their state, their graves, their ancestors, their monuments,

louisianans do not remove monuments, although there were southern generals there too, these are different people, here is johnson, he supports trump, denied the legality of previous presidential elections, that is. he is such a very serious conservative trumpist, but really, his such an innocent, friendly smile, and his manner of not getting into personal insults, a manner that has become characteristic of modern washington, it helped him, but still, probably the main thing is, what johnson will do as speaker, period. how will this affect the us position towards

ukraine? well, if you look, again , at his inaugural speech, the word ukraine was not mentioned at all, among his priorities - this is assistance to israel, the second priority would be. the problems of the us national debt, plus everything, he is very worried about the border, in this light it is probably worth considering the question of what will happen with joe biden’s request for $105 billion, the lion’s share of which is aid to ukraine, and judging by judging by the way he set priorities , most likely these will be separate bills, in principle, what the senate is now planning to do, and ukraine’s priority will most likely not be the first, let’s say

so, the first priority is, of course, assistance to israel, the second is the border, because this is the main argument of the republicans in the fight against joe biden, most likely we will also talk about taiwan, because the republicans: they are very united against china and consider taiwan to be so force in order to defend its positions, but ukraine will probably remain in some kind of long box, plus, even if they provide assistance, the assistance will be greatly reduced, because if we remember what he said, for example, tom cotton, and the closest comrade-in-arms - mcconnoll, and the minority leader... in the senate, he said that they, for example, do not agree with 20 billion, about, not 20, 12 billion payments, but to ukrainian state employees, well, that is, at

least for this amount and the senate, republicans in the senate and in the house of representatives will definitely not agree, and we will see how these expenses will be distributed, but i think that ukraine will receive much less than it is asking for. by the way, senator coton, senator from arkansas, he is known as hawk, he is an american veteran, he was in vietnam, in general, he is known for his tough position, and initially he supported ukraine very strongly, now , as you said, he has some issues of restrictions, well, let’s listen to what the new speaker johnson himself said about ukraine ? we all support the allocation of a new aid package to ukraine, but this... will only happen if the conditions that we are currently working on are met, we demand accountability and want clearly formulated goals from the white house, but we will definitely discuss this issue, and we will do it very productively.

well, it seems to me that this generally speaks for itself, he will not block assistance to ukraine, at least at this stage, but that blind support for ukraine and, as it were, readiness, complete readiness. johnson will most likely not follow biden’s policy advances, but johnson has new chances to prove himself in big american politics. but the impression is that donald trump, i don’t want to say that his chances are disappearing, but that the administration, democrats, numerous prosecutors and judges associated with the administration with democrats, that they are doing everything possible to, firstly, block his political career, and i’ll tell you straight, do some minor dirty tricks to him, tell us what’s happening now with

trump. well, there is indeed some progress in a number of cases against donald trump, if we look at what is happening in georgia, his closest associates, in particular his adviser, lawyer powell, pleaded guilty, and, apparently entered into a plea deal, and as a result of this, the georgia court has arguments against mr. trump that he is really guilty, and this does not mean that he will actually be found guilty and go to jail, but some steps in this we still see in this direction, but again it is worth recalling that there are some progress, and attempts to recognize donald trump as not having enough authority to be

a candidate in the presidential election within the framework of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution are completely this cannot be dismissed, because in some states legal proceedings are still ongoing and this cannot be ruled out, plus there is a trial in new york, they are trying to take away property, well, in general , i think that this is a kind of struggle to wear down donald trump, but if you look at. and if we look, even here is the last pool, we see that, despite these attempts, mr. trump is ahead of joe biden, and i think that the american administration in any case should take into account this fact that they they are vipinating, turning the judicial system into a weapon, and this weapon is working against

the candidates. that is, this can play both in a positive direction for them and in a negative way, but so far what we see is that the popularity of donald trump is growing, and the popularity of joe biden has reached record lows, so some kind of long game is needed here, i don’t know , will they be able to play it against donald trump, you know, like the devil in the box, everything works out for him all the time, so it’s hard to say, how it will all be, but the fact that there are such attempts is undeniable, which is why i am sure that we are dealing with bullying and when i say that we are dealing with bullying, i am not saying that trump is absolutely innocent of anything guilty, trump is a person who is used to living riskily, and let’s say, not always according to the rules, especially the rules set by his political rivals, but here are two points that speak for themselves that

they are trying to exclude him from participating in the elections altogether , citing the fourteenth amendment of the constitution. this amendment was adopted soon after the civil war, which was in 1861, 1865, and there was concern that after the political restrictions imposed in the south were lifted, that many former southern... politicians and even officers and generals of the southern army, that they would rush to the polls they were still popular that they would again seize political control of the south with very unpleasant consequences for the federal authorities, so an amendment was passed that those people who took the oath would uphold the laws and uphold

the federal constitution. went to instead ranks of rebels, that these people do not have the right to be elected, that is, firstly, this applied only to those who joined the ranks of the rebels, but this means that it was first necessary to establish that the person was a rebel, and this was interpreted very simply, for this it was necessary was to take part in the struggle of the southern army, trump obviously did nothing of the kind, but secondly, this amendment was adopted for a short period of time, that is, it remained: in the code, but it was never applied and no one tried to apply it, after you want, believe it or not, after 1876, 1876 year, here they are pulling out these old

rusty weapons against the southern rebels, trying to use them to keep trump out of the election. now the second thing: you mentioned the state of georgia, this is very interesting, now, one after another , uh, participants in the process, other defendants appear, who suddenly enter into a plea deal and undertake to testify against trump and against other defendants, you read in the new york times , washington post, that there are so many people who are ready to admit their guilt and testify that this speaks of trump’s guilt, well, according to this logic, the show trials in moscow in the thirties, they completely showed the guilt

of the defendants, because they all confessed and confessed in large numbers publicly, the fact is that they also introduced such a new legal if you want, canon, in the state of georgia, a black prosecutor, a black activist , who became a prosecutor in one of the counties in the state of georgia, where mostly african americans live, she decided to use the so-called rika against the defendants, if you remember, rika is what was used against the mafia, this is against the roketiri. these are the toughest possible measures and the greatest opportunities to restrict the freedom of the defendants, to take them into custody even before the trial at the very beginning, these are the interesting deals

that are being concluded, these people could be imprisoned for 12 years, and you know what kind of punishment they are given, six months, probation , months, probation, and a fine of $500, which for an overachieving lawyer is not an amount, that is, in other words, they are using a law that has never been used in this way, using how political weapons intimidate defendants, blackmail them, and then they say , guys, everything is not so bad, if you cooperate with the investigation and help us put trump in prison, then we will actually make you innocent, because those punishments, that they were promised are not serious punishments, that’s why i say that

this is bullying, you know, dmitry, i would also like to remember the story with hunter biden, here it is very similar, yes, you can draw an analogy, a guilty person actually receives innocence, as a result of some negotiations, behind the wall, yes, with prosecutors, this, this is a very revealing story in this case and, if we remember, the deal did not take place, but there were such attempts, that is, that the us judicial system is still compromised, on so many levels, we can see from many, many facts, and here i think the same story is absolutely clearly visible, and here laws are applied that have never never been applied to the things that we are now discussing, and

of course, i absolutely agree with you, trump, absolutely not and not innocent, yes, he really always took risks, but what we see here, now, is really, most likely, based on the facts that we are now observing, this is precisely an attempt to eliminate a political rival by all means, taking into account that this competitor is ahead of the current president, and in very many so-called swing states, and that is, he has a very high chance of winning in those states that determine the election results, well, there are a number of unpleasant consequences of this... judicial system in political weapon, and one of the consequences is that people who use such

methods. they understand perfectly well that they are breaking the law, they understand perfectly well that they are irritating their political rivals, they understand that they are setting a precedent, and that what they are doing today could well be used against them if they lose the election , so i assume that people who behave this way will do everything possible and impossible within the law and outside it to prevent for trump to end up in the white house again, it was a big game, we’re going to advertise, they wanted to take me away, some person asked them to find me, they say he’s hiding the child, yes, in ukraine now children in a war zone can be taken away without parental consent .

they just pushed a child into the car, he screams, mom, they’re going to give me up for organs, don’t give me up, on the second floor, there was an operating room where they just gutted them, 7%, budget revenues of ukraine, black transplantology, a built-in system at the state level , come, for example, and they say that we are interested in boys, girls, from 11 to 13, light-eyed, fair-haired. this is just a consumable item for the european union, they treat this issue like buying goods in a store, it is from those people who are a same-sex family, i want to see my baby, premiere, special report, ukraine, children for sale, on sunday on the first . the proletariat must not only call for revolution. but first of all, go to it yourself, the revolution cannot be scheduled for a certain

day or hour, due to the inevitably growing catastrophe, it is necessary now to determine the most successful positions, to arm, to inspire the masses with a revolutionary slogan, to train them in martial arts, to keep them under arms, there is a revolutionary proletarian mass, skill is needed. at the same time throughout the entire space of russia, bring this mass to the streets and unite with a common cry: trodsky, trodsky, point trodsky from november 1, on the first. any religion mixed with blood is a monster that sooner or later devours its own children. do you think you'll feed us to him?

and he will calm down. there's a big game on the air, we know that on issues of public opinion, support for ukraine in the united states is falling, already 55% of respondents are against further military assistance to ukraine, among republicans there are already 75% against, but i'm interested in the broader question: we see that they are starting to get tired of ukraine , and are there any signs that they are starting to get tired of russophobia, that somehow this is a neo-martist wave in the united states, in american politics, that it is somehow starting to subside, or is it too early to talk about it? i think it's too early for this

to say, because russophobia, it did not begin with ukraine, it began much earlier, yes, it began with the soviet union, now in the senate there are people who grew up during the cold war and are changing their minds regarding russia, of course, they are not ready, since russia is the heir of the soviet union, of course, there is a bias towards russia, i think that it is not... probably never, but there really is a certain fatigue there, even in a conversation with taxi drivers, for example, i recently drove, a former military man said that i was ready help, but i have many more problems in my country, and i worry more about myself at the moment than about some other country that i have never been to, these are the majority, the majority of comments that, which.. .. i hear now at the moment: first of all , we need to take care of our borders

, we need to protect us from the flow of illegal immigrants, we have big... problems with paying for housing, we have big problems with paying for gasoline at gas stations, let's solve it first our problems, let's concentrate on our internal affairs, and then we will resolve issues of foreign policy, but here israel stands a little apart, because firstly, the israeli lobby in the united states is very strong, and secondly, if we remember, american citizens died, which is always is such a red rag for american politics, that is, people with blue passports need to be protected no matter what. ukraine is a slightly different story, it is far away, it has already received the largest, largest funding package, perhaps, ever history of the united states, there, if you take into account those same 100 billion, lend-lease, and aid, direct aid, this is the largest

package that has ever been allocated to another country, so they say that enough is enough, enough. is already concentrating on some other problems, well, some kind of forgetting is just beginning on the front pages of ukraine, there are practically no, now there are other questions, so yes, there is a certain fatigue, but that’s what i would like to understand, fatigue from ukraine, i think , will play a role in the american approach in the american readiness. the war in ukraine is a priority for the united states, but i know a number of people