[000:00:00;00] such a confession, it’s a cry to god , lord, don’t remember me like this, that is, don’t remember me doing this act: forget, yes, well, it’s funny to ask god to forget something, but that’s the whole idea, well, no repentance, but repentance is probably based, no, moreover, i believe that repentance, confession is overcoming time, you go back to the time before the sin, as it were, because... this sin is washed away, it goes away, that’s the difference only in this: uh, you are returning to the old time, but with the memory of sin, this there is already a hint of the absence of time, of the absence before and after, uh, and there is simply a repentant sin, and - maybe the desire

to prevent it from happening again, it is washed away, but the scars remain, the scars remain, well, the famous line of pushkin, but the lines are sad or shameful there are options, i don’t wash it away, yes, this is a very important story, because even if you want to get rid of the memory, i agree with my wife, the work is still not to get rid of it, but to understand that it was given for something , well, because there are no tests of superpowers, we understand perfectly well, even if this is a bad memory, a memory of a sinful state of soul or of an action, it doesn’t matter... it is not given in order to be equal to it, memory is what makes us unequal to ourselves in the best sense, look how natural we will now move on to the actual substantive part of the concept, equal, unequal, yuri mikhailovich lotman said that man is memory , culture is memory, i always tell students that to justify this you don’t need a lot of evidence, imagine that you are tomorrow you wake up and don’t remember anything, but what

you don’t remember, no, that is, it turns out that memory is a culture-forming phenomenon, excuse the involuntary academicism, and a person-forming phenomenon, and the question then is, after all, a person is identical to memory or forgetting or not, there is wisdom unburdened by knowledge, that’s who he dealt with wise old men in his old age and sometimes a person does not remember any specific things , but at the same time he is wise, he is absolutely unmistakable in his choice, although he cannot justify it in any way, maybe tolstoy had something similar in mind when said that the man leaving for another world, he takes with him memory, but memory is not about specific events, but memory as a certain sum of ideas of good and evil, here is a certain extract that already exists in isolation from

specific events, that is, the memory of an old man is the memory of a child, i am not i mean that a person falls into childhood at some point , i mean it more in this sense, we are approaching our beginning, so, so this is the same lack of fullness of memory as in childhood, but only after, uh, with experience, the experience does not disappear anywhere, it is extremely interesting, to be honest, at the beginning when you said unburdened memory, i grinned, because i had another associative series, yes , that you have a lot of wisdom, a lot of sadness, i thought that you were talking about this, but you are talking about something completely different, yes, about wisdom, which is filled with sadness, probably in a sense, yes, but now he can afford to not remember some individual episodes, yes, yes, absolutely right, i don’t know the etymology, but i’ll be such a preobrazhensky or fasmer improviser, it seems to me that this from the word

and mother and take, memory yes... she always selective, you can’t remember everything, and zhenya is absolutely right and wise here, yes, that is, we are not talking about some details, episodes, they can also be remembered, but it is important that memory constructs itself, yes, i will return to my previous thought, it changes me, but the task of a person is to remember himself as correct, besides, well, that’s all, but what does it mean to remember himself as correct, you know, a person very often still records different moments in his life, a believer, he... how to preserve the main thing in oneself correctly in a moral sense, that is, again to the fact that what we said is happening, of course, to catch yourself correctly, in life there are different things, there are delusions, there are sins, but it is important to catch construct to see the right thing about yourself, because i am the same boy who hid under the blanket from his mother, read books , i am the same boy who will not be a boy, but someday will die at this moment, like all of us, yes, but it is important to remember yourself correctly, this is acceptable at any second, in youth, in old age, yes,

absolutely, here we spoke to by the way, before the start of the adante program, he had an amazing plot, i’m not sure that it is found anywhere else in this form , it has two rivers, summer and this is a river that washes away bad memories, then a person moves on to evnoe, which basically flows nearby, it consolidates good, this is a good mind, yes, if i put it correctly, again, well, right away, yes, this is probably true, maybe this is the system, it should work like this, who knows, in general, it wasn’t that special spiritual authority, but the very idea of ​​something like this is very close to me

, because even the idea of ​​hell, like there is an opinion that hell is the impossibility of getting away from your memories, that when you see all the beauty of paradise, then at that moment you...' you become incredibly ashamed of yourself, this memory, it burns, maybe this is it , well, this is what chagin suffers from in your novel of the same name, yes, that is, this is actually it, i perceived it as an experience of hellish torment, and he doesn’t know how to forget, he can’t forget his forgetting, this is really so, absolutely true , he either, like judas, must hang himself, and either he will repent, so he repents and this is purely repentance allows him to come up with a new odisi poem in which he gives his new life. i’m far from trying to convince the reader that they just need to rewrite, no, they need to repent

, and then as such a gift , maybe, maybe, i’m not saying, it’s more of a question, is it possible to get away from bad memories and stay with good before death. today we gathered our thoughts about memory, its secrets and mysteries. dmitry petrovich bak, evgeny germanovicholan, i’m vladimir ligoido, let’s continue. but look, memory is not only that we forget something, but we remember something. by and large, augustine writes about this, he says that this is such a palace in which memories are stored, which are either an understatement or an exaggeration, in any case, interpretations. this word gustina no, the construction of selectivity, yes, yes, reality, so i, in fact, in a broad sense, have this question, in a narrow sense, a little narrower, then the question is about the value of memoirs as historical documents, because in general

, is a memoir, it is the memory of an individual person, and the memoirs of another contemporary about the same events will be different. how to perceive this? well, if you allow me, i would still start with forgetting , so that this topic does not disappear, because we are always in this earthly vale - in the face of the realization that we have to forget, yes, something completely different, and i keep repeating the quatrain of my beloved georgy ivanov: if a new life, oh soul , opens in a black grave, how good should it be so that we forget about the earthly one? that is, this moment of possible forgetting what seems valuable is always present in the face of, well, some other memory , these are not memoirs, of course, memoirs, this is personal

experience, yes, yes, well, memoirs are, of course, memory, but this is what memory very, really selective and special, this is not, not what was in fact... in quotes, because the thing itself is the most mysterious point in general, by the way, even at the stage of perception, here we are sitting, the three of us, and we we see completely different things, it’s not even the fact that we are directed there, that’s all completely different, because here is a wonderful neurophysiologist, alexander... kaplan , when i consulted with him, according to roman chagin, he said that even at the stage of vision, vision is not optics, it is the brain, the picture is formed in the head,

and not in the eyes, and a person is able to see something that was not there or not see what is, right at the entrance, this is a completely special picture, and how it all is later in memory, which... drinks away changes, this is only in general, one can be surprised, that is, memory, it’s uh, completely different things. stores, it’s not like five cameras cost five identical pictures, they take five identical pictures, this is a completely different story, and memoirists need to, well, at least be checked, well, yes, if we want historical ones, i just know, i thought of something else, here the bridge is directly thrown to the topic of imaginary memories, not just interpretations, again in chayin there is this nikolai ivanovich, and this story about a business trip... to chagin’s britain, i’ll be honest, i still want

to think that this invisible, when i'm at the end i think that’s how he came up with it all, i don’t like it, i’ll assume that ’s what happened, but in fact, here’s another kaplan, our author is a wonderful fama, he’s in his article, poychagin, yes, he wrote that he, as a mathematician, immediately remembered complex numbers, parts of which are imaginary quantities, but the meaning is that this creates a kind of three-dimensional vision, and then you know, i immediately start thinking further and remember... lotman, who says that art is this is the experience of the unlived, the most important human experience, it turns out that the imaginary memories of any person, they allow him to be a creator in some sense, more than he is, more than in reality, this is almost art, yes, that is, there is no art without art, well , in general realizes herself in different ways, anna karenina, for example, anna karenina , i am convinced that everything that happened to her stems from the desire that she experiences when opening a book, even at the very beginning, when she goes to reconcile, steve with his wife

and there she meets vronsky with his mother, meets vronsky himself, she so wanted live the lives of all the heroes, yes, that’s the whole point, i think that the reader experiences the same thing, as a child i so wanted onegin not to kill lensky, when i re-read it, but suddenly he won’t kill, i thought, that is, this in general, it’s fiction, this is, in principle, the law of art, when you perceive art, you think that it’s enough... they correspond to your conviction, your rightness, you’re not right, remember the paintings of picassa or picasso, how convenient it is to pronounce, where two nose of dora maar, yes, because he wants to see her right away profile, full face, we see each other's face, but there are other sides, so any memoirist, he is sacred... he is that he writes the truth, even if he wants to deliberately

distort it, like zhorzhik ivanov in st. petersburg winters, in a word , for me, in the memoirs, the most valuable thing is still subjective, yes, kotaev has a disease in the grass, he describes it there, how he considers his friendship with bunin, so that bunin asked him something all the time, well there mayakovsky asked bunin. in the damned days, and in him, the only phrase, completely destructive, i don’t want to repeat it, that he would have sold everyone, including there , if they had paid, here are the memoirs of two people, and about specific ones, they do not contradict each other, these are two truths, maybe both are true, but solomon’s judgment , it’s as if it’s impossible to say

what he sold or didn’t sell, that’s not the question, well, yes, but it’s just surprising , so to speak, the range of opinions, well, yes, although here , you know, i can’t help but remember this famous buddhist parable, five or how many four blind men who approached the elephant, but from different sides, and one, that means, who is this trunk, he is absolutely right, he says that it is a snake or a wall, a rope, yes, memory is always like this, it cannot embrace everything at once, it cannot give this three-dimensional vision. vision in general, this is our apparatus, we do not see infrared ultraviolet, a bat sees, so what about experience , actually, i have always been fascinated by the fate of an actor, a great actor who really has, if he takes his work deeply in a serious sense , then he can really live several

lives and can... live them with full dedication, this is a colossal experience, if you approach it correctly, but the actor is not required to read, by the way, this is a very interesting topic, it can take us a little now, yes, but maybe we’ll stop for a second, because we can’t live, we can’t live, there, according to the system, not according to the system, again, nikita sergeevich mikhalkov said, when in his native mardyukovo there is one phrase, oh you 42. 40 and he says that if you approach, she plays so much that every time an ambulance takes her away, then this is just a professional mistake, yes, then there is an actor who must instantly be able to switch off somehow. but because otherwise these experiences, they are already on the verge of schizophrenia, no, as stanislavsky says , and i, since i teach at amhat, i love konstantin sergeevich very much, he says a simple thing, that nothing can be played, you can only grow, develop something in yourself, it must be your genuine emotion,

but you need to find something in your life that leads to this emotion and make it yours, appropriate it, and this is scary, of course, this is with on the one hand there are several... lives, on the other hand, as if i’m killing in a rush, distance, after all, distance, there shouldn’t be, no, i’ve been teaching acting for many years, so i won’t argue with you all the time about this , today we gathered our thoughts about memory, dmitry petrovich bak, evgeniy germanovich vodolaskin, we continue, i always try to explain to students why memory is needed, they say, well, how is it, well, now we can say that they will turn off the internet, they used to say they wouldn’t turn it off, but now we understand that. maybe electricity it may be lost for some time, yes, but i really liked it - tatyano vladimevna chernigovskaya and i talked once on this topic, and i said, well, what is memory for knowledge, for education, she says, but memory is not about memorizing information that is not knowledge, but this is about contexts

, associations, but this, if you don’t have this on your shelves, yes, then it’s very difficult to put together this mosaic of knowledge, like yours? responds, this is the thesis, of course, this is a complex existence, or existence in a context, it is necessary, because, well, let’s say, if you raise a person in the sans souci palace, surrounding him with a wall, then nothing good will come of it, by the way, the wonderful novel by alexei varlamov , my soul pavel, that’s about it, that’s this same model, there’s a huge problem here, how many artistic things

are based on the fact that something is hidden from someone so that he doesn’t know, doesn’t remember, most often these are all unsuccessful attempts, that’s it... memory, it certainly contextual, for example, when i remember something, i often don’t even remember exactly what was said, but i remember where with what facial expression, this is such synesthesia, or i remember what it smelled at that moment, for example, it smelled like the sleepers of the station, olfactory memory, it is considered one of the strongest, i remember dmitry sergeevich likhachev said that from childhood he remembers the smell of heated boxwood, the crimean smell, and he says, when i am now an old man, i hear this smell, my mood immediately improves, memory is not information that can be

presented like this in three pages, memory is everything totality, this the world of god, as it appears to everyone in its entirety, therefore, in fact, this has always, mm, excited me, so i tried to describe it as it comes, not as information, a report about something, but in all of these, let’s say, if a child is lying in bed, then he sees drawings on both , he runs his finger over these drawings, his grandmother reads robinson cruz to him, everything in the world is connected, that’s what kharmsakh talks about, remember, everyone goes on trams and doesn’t know how everyone is connected to each other, but we need to remember this, well, we’ve heard a wonderful essay, from the lips of evgeniy vodolaskin,

it’s just a fragment from a novel, but i don’t want an essay, but a gelerter thesis, vladimirovich, you asked a little. this is not knowledge, because my two favorite examples, evgei borichnak , he told me twice that his father said that if the gospel had the power of mathematics, then there would be no evil in the world, but because no person, a believer, an unbeliever, an atheist, a buddhist, whatever, cannot say that he does not distinguish between good and evil in the gospel, well, it’s clear, it’s clear, like 2:2, as a theorem, but nevertheless the world is in evil, so some more effort is needed. identification with you, i have remembered for the rest of my life a phrase from the memoirs of alexei feodovich losyev, it is like this, i know it from memory, when i first learned that the sum of the angles of a triangle is equal to two right angles, i realized that from now on this is my truth. mine and no one else will take it away from me, you see, this moment is missing, yes, newton’s law, it came to newto as an insight that he

understood this at that moment, and things fell with the acceleration of free fall and before, how he formulated this, this device that we all have in our pockets, they teach us something else, yes, that there is simply naked truth, memory, i spied it, and it’s as if you appropriated it, nothing like that, you need to make it yours, appropriate through a hyphen, but still... in your example from the gospel, it seems to me that another difference is that scientific knowledge, it is, well, if you like, violent, yes, i learned that 2:2 and if i if i argue with this, then maybe they will take me, but only to kashchenka, dostoevsky says twice two, four besides me will be, not dostoevsky, but according to man, yes, yes, let's say knowledge, here is the union of oneself with the gospel truth, it already requires a volitional choice, knowledge of the multiplication table, well, it requires, this is another will, yes, but this thing sets us up, what is this ... does not require almost anything, yes, well, since i looked, i tell the students, what should you do 40 years ago if you don’t remember where the line of the poem comes from, he tells me to go to the library, and that

you will go to the girls at the checkout you ask where the line came from, the years of rebellion went by, how can you find out, well, by the way, you know, i’m talking about i also wanted to talk about these memory stealers, because look, we started with the fact that culture is a collective memory, yes, and a person is an individual memory, but what happens? this may be too bold a generalization, although in essence it seems true to me, any information revolution, it gives a serious increase in collective memory, begins the invention of writing, and printing, and hits the individual, always, yes, the iliad of odysseus arises in a learned culture, a necessity disappears, individual my memory is declining, i had a classmate whom evgeniy onegino knew by heart from any moment, he could continue, we perceived him as a hero already, although probably for the ancient greeks he was, well, what’s there to remember, but individual memory, well, we’re okay

we can’t do anything about it, yes, it’s such an unsolvable story that collective memory with the help of such things , it’s somehow still, well, more or less unsolvable, because a person, of course , lives a short life, it takes him some... then it’s time to get involved here in this humming collective creativity, yes, all-human creativity, here he gets an education, he gets involved, well, yes, here ’s the thing, personal memory , historical memory, in fact, a person, 90 percent, is formed by personal memory and personal experience, here is historical memory , she enters into him some small 10. prehistory of his existence, they are the most important, but for the formation of a person as

a spiritual phenomenon, what is important, first of all , is personal, personal memory, well, this is like some kind of preface, it is also historical is also connected, yes, because if your personal memory includes dante, i don’t know, the french revolution, like what you know about it, the gospel story, this... this is the meeting place, but here’s the individual and the collective in in any case, this is something that ultimately becomes one’s own, it is so absorbed by a person that it passes, this too, it must be said, is a special phenomenon when something passes from the sphere of abstract knowledge into your personal history, i just remember some things that became facts of my life, for example,

ups and downs with dickins's characters, it was me, and it is inseparable from me, this is what a person appropriates to himself, masters, makes his own, this moves from the category of general historical memory to the category of personal, this is real, but now a thought just occurred to me , maybe it is quite immature, but it seems to me that in a sense , collective memory, there , what is part of background knowledge in some sense can change faster than individual, maybe i’m wrong, but here i am now i thought, here they left our background context, for example, there ilf and petrov, well , when i’m trying to say with the students that i once said that your answers remind me of how shura balaganov, boykono monotonously recounted the contents of the brochure on ochakova, i thought that the answer would be a friendly walk, and the answer was such stupid looks, what are you talking about , yes, it remains in my individual memory , that is...’ it’s just a large volume, because there are the same number of seconds in a day as there were 2000 years

ago, there are a lot of carriers fighting for us, not only ilf petrov, but also strif. for example, i don’t make any comparison between trifonov and elf petrov, galich has disappeared, galich has disappeared, but there is no person who does not have trifonov in his head, or makanin, well, here’s another one, when i tell students that this is a classic, well an absolute classic of a certain time, vladimir semyonovich makakan, this name does not exist at all, because well, how are we used to the fact that literature and art and our life in general exist according to the principle of the media, according to the principle of the information occasion, what is remembered is that it kind of catches you, as the younger generation says, but what doesn’t catch you goes away, yes , indeed, and this is such a serious story, well, some kind of unconditional classic, if i may say so, it still remains, for me it’s in a sense, it’s still an example of greatness or something, yes, because sometimes it would be better not to stay , my famous question, i’m a student asking, is pushkin a genius, yes, why, i can’t say,

yes, how ulato do you love pushkin , just hate it. yes, and i immediately begin to tell why zhenya is sure he could also, why can’t i live without him, yes, but something that is absolutized on the tablets is written down forcibly, it disappears, yes, an absolutely amazing story, i sometimes read fragments of chagin, in public, and there i have a story about lenin and pechnyak, texts by tvordovsky, zoshchenko and nikolai ivanovich, so... i see, no one is laughing, no reaction, i say, the audience is quite young, and i say, raise your hand, whoever read lenin pechnyak, not a single one, that is i'm not saying that everyone should read it, but here we have it everyone knew, yes, yes, but it was part of the language, yes, here is an independently living phrase , here and here absolutely, here is the generation gap,

here maybe it’s not the worst thing, it’s not what’s needed. repeat day and night on lenin and pechnik, but it shows how differently the generation is structured, what different experiences they have, well, this is the other side of accessibility, the notorious democracy, yes, because accessibility means absence, once i was in front of a large audience said, well, let me say mandelstam’s line, who can continue, continue, i don’t even have a line uttered, and two words, enough to sulk, the audience stood up, as if paratha. i accepted, i said, we’ll put the papers in the table, but then it wasn’t, well, these were people of my age , our age and beyond, but madelenstein was impossible to buy, get, read, but everyone knew it, now it’s there, but on there is nothing on this disc, this is the most important, your thesis, i actually heard it from you for the first time several years ago, when you said that this universal accessibility of information and even knowledge of some kind

is turning out, i just don’t get it, i i really like it. theodor adorn's phrase is that in order to fully perceive the music, you still need to get to where it is performed , it is terribly important, a symphony has no sound recording, there is no technical reproducibility according to benjamin, yes, so if you want to hear a symphony, you must understand where it is performed, once a year, yes, get there , to the philharmonic in another city, then listen, now, to what we are doing, click, click, beethoven's ninth, yes, the first scriabin, but this is not completeness. this is lightness, which is false, and lightness, even something more, like me i remember zanusi told me that he hadn’t used a mobile phone for a long, long time, and he was talking about some priest he knew who had a dog barking on the call, he says, why, he says, well, that’s it notification, here i am a man from the village, when someone came, a dog barked, and when excuse

me, you are in the restroom and vivalda, yes, yes, and this is something like that, well, this is some kind of cultural some kind of breakdown, the combination is incompatible and one process and another, i think even so, it’s definitely a risky joke dear friends, well, we didn’t have time, of course, i think that i’ll have to gather my thoughts again, i wanted to talk more about the memory of time, to continue the topic of forgetting a little, well , maybe with your permission next time, but you know where i would like to end, well, in a sense, today we are in captivity of pragmatism, but i would like to ask you this instrumental question: if you think memory training is important, can you advise something for this very training, i’m not really the one who could to advise regarding memory, but it seems to me that that is, i heard and i think that this is so, you need to learn poetry, that’s exactly

what i say, they say that it’s better in a foreign language, well, it’s possible. on my own, less, less effect, but i’m against the word to teach, you need to learn, you need to learn, and uh, good poems, they are simply remembered, lived, lie on the heart, the goal, well, russian literature is poetry, yes, that’s how it is the quintessence of language, any speech dies at the moment of utterance, including you and me, here are the poems they are immediately forever, yes, they are poems in general, a universal remedy for everything, likhachev said that during the blockade , when it was -20 in the room, it was impossible to read a book, everyone was lying under all the blankets, but he says, but they read poetry out loud, this... i agree, completely, poetry according to -russian, and not in russian, not in russian, i agree with you, but this is a special charm, it’s still an effort, unless

of course it’s your native, second language, yes, that is, you understand in a special way, what is it , a non-fictional word, not a face, not an eye above others, not, well, polish is not my native language, but this is mickiewicz. difficulties in learning russian poetry in translation. rast. i can continue. by switching to native languages. and you know, in this regard, what i really like, the ancient greeks say, the pythagoreans used it, not the pythagoreans, i don’t know. when you are already going to bed, going to bed, try to remember the day in all its details, in all the smallest details, well, firstly, you immediately

fall asleep, they say, if you practice, yes, but it really trains your memory, thank you very much, expensive friends, i really don’t want to part with you, but time is inexorable, but we still have the memory, evgeniy germanovich vadolaskin, dmitry petrovich bak. today we gathered our thoughts about memory. hello, this is the end times podcast. my name is evgeniy dodalev and today i will tell you about one of the most demonized figures of the soviet bageme. we are talking about boris buryats. he said that he was the son of a gypsy baron. but in general there was such a pantar, a lot of different

criminal stories were hung on it. there are publications, there are television series, there are film incarnations, from which it follows that he is a villain, the lover of galina leonidovna brezhneva, a soviet princess, daughter... of general secretary leonid ilivich obrezhnev, and allegedly boris, was guilty of the death of many actresses who collected diamonds, was a gunner , and the organizer of the crimes, i very much doubt this, because at one time i had the opportunity to familiarize myself with the materials of the criminal case, at the filing of telman kharenie chakdlyan, with whom we worked on books and publications about the so-called uzbek affair.

he organized a meeting with boris for me, although according to the myth he was already dead by that time, and his pursuers were the gypsy community of the soviet union, cursed and there were rumors that all the troubles that happened with yuri mikhailovich churbanov, the husband... of galina leonidovna brezhneva, and with many other characters, it was all a consequence of this gypsy curse, and the first time i saw boris was back in my student days, it was in the oragve restaurant, he was a bohemian star, as it turned out later, but i saw him in the company of some athletes , it was the soviet union national team, even now i can’t remember what sport, we had a student group there and boris showed attention - to one of

the girls, who was in our company, there was some kind of conflict situation, we were forced to leave, and boris then said that we would see each other again, she told me, i didn’t know who he was, after the fact the waiter was familiar, he said that this was a very powerful human, lover, brezhnev, uh, who got him a job at the big theater, and such a significant figure in the criminal world, who can find him there and somehow deal with it. i don’t believe, i don’t believe in any of this, no, they were, of course, familiar with galina leonidovna, i don’t know how close they were, but he was such an interesting man, completely different from his television film incarnations, he made an impression basically what is called filing, that is, he dressed, since they did not dress in the soviet union, that is

some kind of floor-length fur coats, shirts, with these collars, hairy chests, with a huge cross decorated with diamonds, well, that is , he attracted attention, and we finally saw him, many years later, the building of the general prosecutor's office of the soviet union, and his status, at the moment when we saw each other for the second and last time , was a prisoner, to be honest, i didn’t even recognize him, that is , telmanich warned me that there would be a meeting with boris buryatsov, because i was then working on the series publications under the general title kremlingate about the brezhnev dynasty and just asked me to arrange this date, his term was already running out, the fact is that he was in a camp, there he picked up some very exotic disease,

something related to mites, they live in his eyelashes , he lost all his eyelashes, that is, his eyes looked very strange, without eyelashes at all, especially considering that his eyebrows remained the same, that is , such an appearance was very strange, and of course he evoked sympathy, he was completely depressed, him a lot, i say that all sorts of crimes were hanged, that he participated in the theft of diamonds and uzoya fedorova, i remember that the first issue, a top secret bulletin, which was organized by yuliyan semenovich semyonov, and he was dedicated, the cover was dedicated specifically to zoya fedorova, because it was a noisy case, and we, i mean when i say, we are a top secret team, because i was the first full-time employee of this publication, and we worked on this case, there was not a word in

the official documents about boris buryat, while while rumor, and there in the masses of newspaper and magazine publications they attributed his participation, either as a gunner, or again as the organizer of this murder , in the theft of jewelry, zoya fedorova, and in the case materials, which in any case were provided to me for review from telman's perspective, the only thing that boris was charged with was article 154 of the criminal... code of the russian federation, it was just stupid speculation. it was large-scale, in my opinion, one of the episodes was about 11 yugoslav sheepskin coats, sold, well, basically he was sentenced, but he was sentenced, he received 7 years, he received the term precisely for profiteering, there were no murders or any conspiracies, but for some reason it was believed that galina

leonidovna brezhneva should have smeared him , who was either his patroness or girlfriend, or i don’t know, he didn’t hold a candle to his mistress, for some reason he had to make excuses for him, as many said, and yuri mikhailovich churbanov, the husband of galina leonidovna brezhneva, this is generally wild, of course, i’m with yuri mikhailovich, naturally, asked about boris, he was very irritated. left this topic, that is, it is clear that he knew about his wife’s hobbies, but it was not, firstly, galina leonidovna’s only hobby, and secondly, it was not a fact that it had some kind of downright romantic when i i say romantic, i mean a bed character, maybe she just liked the company of interesting, completely interesting companions, with a sense of humor, with some common interests, with... yuri

mikhailovich churbanu, i lived in the same house, before how he became, in fact, that very churbanov, brezhnev’s husband, and i was actually a schoolboy, i lived in house number 23 on second novostankinskaya street, this is this house, this is a five-story building, what is called khrushchev, this is the second entrance where i lived, this is this entrance where yuri lived. why did i actually remember my neighbor, well, firstly, he lived in the entrance where my friend, dima likhanov, lived, my father, who was also a soviet writer, but at this moment we are talking about, he was just a correspondent newspapers komsomolskaya pravda,

it was called a komsomol village, because in these, in this house, in the neighboring houses they lived, who were members of the komsomol, my dad worked. truth, which was the organ of the central committee of the komsomol, and yuri mikhailovichnov, he worked in the central committee of the young communist league, in the head of some department there. and the old women who were sitting there on these benches in this courtyard, they of course knew a lot about churbano, in particular they knew that he was not entitled to the status of the black volga, which took him to work every morning. no one knew that he... was already there part of the family, general secretary. in komsomol then they worked with their livers, they said that this meant that in order to make a career, it was necessary to drink very seriously, so yuri mikhailovich, this is

not me at all in a negative way, i myself when i became a soviet journalist , i went through this in komsovolsk, that is, i absolutely do not condemn the person who abused alcohol in the soviet ... union, because it was one of the main entertainments, let’s say, yuri mikhailovich in general, he loved life, in this sense, he was such a handsome man and a seabort, and he probably also loved to work, since he made such a career, because he made a career even before he met galina leonina brezhneva, by the way, again, when i was working on a book about the uzbek case, investigators from the ussr prosecutor general's office shared photographs with me and - i used several of them in my book about - churbanov about the brezhny dynasty , i put this one on the cover because well, here he is, i just like him and i want to see him

there for this carpet in uzbekistan where where is the fruit and everything is wonderful tell us about nikolai markin? are you a tros or something? sorry, friend, i didn’t recognize you right away, you are the one, if you need anything, just say so. who is in favor of making lev davidovich trotsky a member of the petros? i have to go, should i go with you? natalia, spend time with the guys at home. kolya, i ask you, please, come up with something, well, help me, well, give birth to me,

please, that trodsky is on the fourth of november on the first, why are you with me, brother? you made me human, it was impossible, impossible, humanity never wins wars, hello, 140,000 inhabitants live in pamplona, ​​the population of the city during the

san fermino fiesta reaches half a million. in the ancient bullfighting ritual that has come down to us, a message about the real current state of the world has been preserved, and for those who are still dissatisfied with their reflection, the great spaniard, haseargat, answered. in themselves, things are neither good nor evil; good and evil lie in our desire or unwillingness to desire them. motador, sun and shadow on the square... mercy, tomorrow on