[000:00:00;00] look, eagle, i feel great in your sky, and you, look, don’t choke in my vision, i’m not an eagle, but a lion, so i’m not a duck , you know, kova, i also remembered the old parable, one day a jackal came to kolv and says, let’s fight. the lion grinned and turned away , and the jackal threatened him, i’ll tell everyone that the lion was scared of me, the lion yawned and answered kala,

i advise you to turn off the light. atasha, you go, i’ll work a little more. i don’t believe you, you’re too old to last a long time, you’re too lazy to die in bed, you think, perhaps, only about this is what you think, in any case, your way

of avoiding responsibility is definitely not for me, be bolder. i didn’t expect anything else from you, i’m already

dead, like everything you trotsky lived on. months, when we talk about ukraine, we note that intense battles are taking place, we mean military battles on the dividing line, some ukrainian attempts to strike with their missiles, and sometimes with sabotage groups, but now other tense events began to occur in ukraine , and in this case, not a lot between president zelsky and the commander-in-chief of the ukrainian forces valery zaluzhny, they clearly had serious disagreements on the merits about how the ukrainian so-called counter-offensive was going, what to do next, and clearly some personal friction arose that reached the commander of

the ukrainian forces, some kind of there are still unconfirmed speculations that, as they say, it was not a mistake, that it was not an accident. tell us, general vuzhinsky, what is really happening now on the real line of contact of the two armies, in ukrainian politics? yes, dmitry, that’s what’s happening, no, our active defense continues to confirm its... status of active defense, which means that our troops in certain directions are moving forward, a little, not quickly, but moving forward persistently forward, this is of course not an offensive, this is just a really active defense, i hope that the offensive will not bypass the ukrainian one, which is what time magazine is about, here is a well-known article last week, there are no

revelations there, by the way, no, everything is there ... it is known, all the facts are those that have been known for a long time, the most remarkable thing is the cover, where the phrase that no one believes... in victory like i do, the word no one is highlighted in full screen and it is incomprehensible, and it is natural that this a powerful signal from zelsky, because time magazine is not the latest publication, it has a pro-democratic orientation, i have a democratic party, and what shuster wrote, and even announced that it will be continued, and he is their famous correspondent, he is their famous correspondent, awarded orders there, in general, this is not, not the same shuster that this savik is, this friend had his first interview in december last year, when he, uh, well , such a bravura interview, give me 300

tanks, give me 500 - 700 - infantry fighting vehicles, armored personnel carriers, and i will reach the borders of the ninety-first year easily, well, naturally they gave him more, they gave him not 300 , 450, a tank army, they gave, uh, there are about 800 guns, that is, two artillery pieces , such a phrase, here’s an article, zaluzhny, then i would have her formulated in such a way that what is available is available i mean, the number of personnel and the number of weapons of military equipment do not give me the commander-in-chief the opportunity to carry out... those 17 km that they invented, no one can find them on the map to this day, these 17 km, that’s it

then yaroslavny begins to cry, the soldiers are not the same, the officers are not the same, the tactics are not what we said, that he should remember, so to speak, not the book of general semyonov there in 1921, but newer developments, which he probably also studied, advice is... be a ratio forces of means, necessarily superiority, then and supremacy in the air, two or three is better than a threefold advantage in personnel in armored vehicles, in artillery, ukraine has none of this, they took nato tactics with their battalion groups there, probing weak points, all this is over, as expected, nothing, so what will happen next, you need not stop, you need to go forward, regardless of this is zelsky’s position, this is zelsky’s position, yes, but i think that zaluzhny does not agree with him, he writes, no, this is not in his article, but there is information that many brigade commanders are already

refusing to carry out this order and fight in the winter with such a shortage of everything they can, russian infrastructure, the main thing for them is to cover their energy facilities. otherwise they will simply freeze in winter, i’m not sure that the americans will fulfill zelsky’s request, well, for russia this is good, for ukraine , frankly speaking, it is not very good, but if ukraine receives the aid package that biden promised it, and this is very problematic, but if she gets it, it's from your point of view... could the situation influence the situation and suddenly it turns out that zelsky is more right than the swindlers? no, no, i assure you that what is promised is for these 500 million dollars,

no, i mean, a big package, all these billions, but you understand, these same 106 billion dollars of american dollars are already there , ministry of defense, pentagon warehouses, that, i think, of these, well, 10, maybe 15 , and then spread out over a whole year, again these will be small, in fact there are more spread out there, even more, these are again small batches , well, they have shells, they need them produce, they have a very large shortage of shells, there was a separate air defense army, there were 1,200 launchers of various systems, there were s200, s300, beeches, and now we are talking about there, well, 20, 30, well, well, 100, maximum, but it can be covered kiev, it can be covered, some, that is, a successful ukrainian offensive, strategic, unrealistic, no

, there’s no talk about this at all, i don’t know , general, thank you, well, for real, intense battles with a lot of blood, including including civilians, they are, of course, happening now in the gaza strip, between israel and hamas, today, by the way, is a month since hamas carried out its attack on israel. when this happened i immediately said, this is that the ultimate military victory will be on the side of israel, i don't know a single person who would think otherwise, it was not a revelation, but just such a fundamental inequality of power that, so to speak , , israel, despite all its miscalculations, was doomed to win, well, what do you think, academician naumkin about how... israel, that the israelis, in general, are fighting

very cruel, and does not particularly take into account the losses among the palestinians. i was not fully prepared for how the netanyahu government is waging this war. is this so, firstly, and secondly, if this is so, then it will have some real consequences for israel and the united states. i agree with you. i think that israel is waging a war brutally, there’s no other word for it, simply brutal , that’s what i think too, well, very good, that’s why i asked the question i asked, i aggravated it a little, i think it’s just atrocity, what he is doing, because to destroy the civilian population like this has already exceeded 10,000, the number of victims, including up to 2/3 of them, are women and children, it is scary and most importantly it is not clear what purpose this is pursuing, only for the sake of is there a rise in the world of anti-semitic... some kind of sentiment

that will hit israel, and israel, and so , unprecedented, is experiencing a loss of confidence in itself as a high-tech, developed, strong military and technological power, and the same the most can be said about prime minister netanyahu, who a convincing victory, even if on the battlefield, there will of course be an advantage, probably from a military point of view, i’m not a military person, therefore, although i don’t have much experience in my youth, i think that even from a military point of view, defeat those who wanders underground 500 km away, well-equipped tunnels, erosion of the popularity that israel had, even in the arab world, it was not for nothing that they put up with it, signed these abrahamic

or abrahamic agreements, and where does all this go now, if states such as let's say, south africa has already recalled its ambassador, part of the arab states, jordan is the closest state to israel in the arab world, which recognized israel, established relations with the palestinians, and if suddenly there are elections in palestine, they will most likely be postponed, at a minimum, that's what, who will be there, who will win, that's who the people will be for, it turns out that, uh, abbas is 87 years old, god bless him, and he too, he has his own electorate, but he loses, of course, to the other two, but of these other two, one of them is in prison in israel, maybe they will let him go, because he is far from the worst person for them, he is very moderate, and less radical than, and less radical, but defeats him because this... 23%, 24

%, you know, who has ismail gonia, the leader of hamas, yes , among the palestinians there are not hamas members at all, but palestinians in general, this is the result, what they achieve with their actions, i want to ask you one very difficult question, to which i have the conversation with king hussein itself, and what happened interestingly, it was not in jordan, but it was during one of his visits to israel, let’s say, formally secret, but really. in general, quite regular ones, where he met, among other things, with israeli ministers, then one of them, weissman, even became the president of israel, and uh, in terms of how his relations with israel developed at that moment, he had some hopes, in general, not unfounded, what prime minister rabin did later, who was killed, shows what they had in israel at that time. such

more moderate, constructive tendencies, but he told me one thing that i always remembered, he said that this optimistic tendency, it is imaginary, can only be pushed under the carpet for some time, then he said what many have said arab leaders, he said, i know palestinians, not dogs, then there was a pause, well, i say, of course, i don’t mean all palestinians. i tell their leadership, they are people without honor and dignity and common sense, but if there is no agreement will come, here... now such an explosion has occurred, it has happened, of course, he was right in this sense, but what can be done, well, you need to at least have an exit strategy, that’s what in english is called an excess strategy, that’s it seems to me that i could be wrong, it seems to me that israel does not have it, it is not visible, and even people who have a good

attitude towards israel, there are my colleagues in the united states, in europe, they are planning to destroy all of hamas, how is this possible , i don’t understand, so... it’s not possible if everything turns to dust and ashes, so to speak, just bomb it as in cancer, as in, well, absolutely, like masul cancer, everything from the outside is just a field left and ruined, but the most interesting thing is that some people whom we know well surprise me, just there a couple of days ago, i looked in front of us, i told kulyakov stories about what would happen next. and he said absolutely, absolutely what was said just now, that hamas should be completely destroyed, well, i wasn’t surprised here when i heard this, but i was terribly amazed when i heard the second part of this statement, that

it turns out that hezbollut also needs to be completely destroyed completely, as they are going to do, well, if kedmi, it is clear that he especially repeats ita aryangvir, well, this is an impossible thing, this is a parliamentary party, the minister is there, this is a sovereign country. and it’s just that the only thing they threaten is to destroy everyone, well, the third thing that remains is to just say that iran has yet to be destroyed, that ’s right, i thought that, well, now he’ll say everything, everything can just fall, well, i was very amazed, honestly, smart man, he says such things, an intelligent man, definitely, i don’t i will criticize him one simple time at our program, that’s why i and when someone comes to us as a guest, i argue with them about it.

supported the idea that they would create a palestinian state in response to the hamas terrorist attack. and if this is the case, i really don’t understand what kind of solution can be found now, but only if we call this tin can, throw it forward, reach some kind of temporary agreements, well, purely hypothetically, but some kind of completely new one stunning administration, well, it's called in particular, figurakhlyan, as a well-known leader, now is not the time to talk about him, well, they say that maybe he would agree and, so to speak, promote him, well , i think that if he was a suicide, he might agree , i don’t think, the second, the second option is to put the palestinian authority there, well, poor mahmoud abbas , whom i know very well, there are other options, a lot, i won’t list them all, for example, a dozen, so to speak, scenarios, they are voiced, they everyone can’t

stand, in my opinion, any criticism, just like that like a multinational force, which no one will want to enter, the europeans have already said that they do not want to. when we cannot find some kind of solution between states, there is always a tendency to look at organizations to decide who will go there to fight? senator denisov, among other things, is a former ambassador to the un, so when i watch how the representative of israel to the un, hamit openly, to the secretary general of the united nations and demands that he resign, i have a feeling that at least one from the parties to this conflict absolutely not inclined to provide and he, to put it mildly, is not in the best position, uh , you know, for me this is to some extent, deep, even, if you like, personal disappointment, this is absolute helplessness,

he created the situation, yes indeed, who else can we rely on, as i myself said about it, including at this table. that this is the only organization with universal legitimacy, created in order not to pave the way to heaven, but unfortunately, the degeneration applicable to this situation, that is, multilateral diplomacy it is simply degenerating before our eyes, to our greatest regret, and why it is degenerating, we also talked about this, and first of all, dmitry, you drew attention to this, because multilateral diplomacy is right there, on the table, and not on tv screens, that’s what -these exchanges are combinations with the same americans over the search for certain exit opportunities, that’s the one. which academician naumkin spoke about, now

this simply does not exist, because, literally today or maybe yesterday, in addition to the rest of the american emissaries, the near east, right in the thick of it, the director of the cia, a specialist in russia, headed here, he actually worked here, including as an ambassador, that’s all true, but in fact he is an arabist, with a good... arabic language, at that time there was quartet, here it is, dear mr. burns, he was then the representative of the usa in this quartet, the quartet is the un, the european union, the usa and russia, but in reality it is the usa and russia, the european union, and partly the un played a supporting role, so it was possible to discuss , throwing aside, as they say, everything else, what to do in this situation, now such opportunity. lost, and if it is not restored in some form, then it seems to me that we can put an end to

multilateral efforts to resolve the conflict. i know only one argument that netanyahu, for example, could make if he wanted, otherwise we will lose the support of the united states, otherwise the united states will not provide us with military assistance, otherwise the united states will not hover. resolutions in the un security council that could go against the interests of israel, as you think, senator, the united states, in this situation, with all due respect to mr. bernz, the united states, if you want, further escalating tension in the middle east, you know, the united states, no matter how you treat it, is of course a powerful power , including its

the achilles heel is the dependence on the election cycle, it seems to me that now at this stage it’s spoiling the whole thing, if all this happened , well, at least let’s say a calendar, one could hope that cunning and smart, experienced people, well, if won't come up with something, but at least they will find some, some kind of clue, now, unfortunately, here you go, blinkin and netalya. so what? nothing, because this is what in chess is called tsuk-tswank, yes, no matter where you go , it’s still bad, so unfortunately, well, they’re just devalued, devalued, and they also lost erdogan, but as if they lost it for themselves, for the world is not yet completely complete, no, not completely, but he somehow feels that he has found the opposite for himself, that’s right, how connected? about erdogan's position? it seems to me very strongly

it is clear that they are worried, this is really serious, and what he says is to worry the united states, well , unfortunately, it is economically very weak, it has practically no economic chorags, it needs western help, and it seems to me that he hopes that in return for reducing the intensity of the rhetoric, maybe he will still get it, i think so, he is a very pragmatic leader, and he also counts, of course, on the help of rich islamic arab monarchical states, this is absolutely, although not at all reliable, but an ally in the middle east, and now, since things are not going well with israel, and of course, aid of 4 billion annually is strong for israel from america, but erdogan would also have to give something, but his rhetoric is so powerful , that it certainly reduces the chances of... thank you, we’re going to go to advertising, we’ll be back in just a few minutes and about the american military armada, it

will lead, i don’t know what, we’re going to go to advertising, they call themselves the welterbergs, who are all these people, i'm not allowed to talk about this, the owners who run this club? they are for sherms, they don’t want to be known, it is necessary to go through rituals, they challenge god, this is the horror, the conference in lisbon was the most secret, does not fit the idea of ​​a world government, through control of artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence is already active applied on the battlefield, i mean ukraine specifically, they really want to subjugate russia, this is bilderg’s program, without this the world domination of the anglo-saxons is unattainable, if our america is a doll. who, who with this doll manages? and the club: embassy of hell, dolls

of the heir tutti, tomorrow on the first. bourbon stirirman, a product of the stetellar group, look back and see that i have lived a very good life. boris klyuev is an actor who could safely say that life was good. ilivy is so charming. roles in tv series, cinema and theater that you can only dream of. almost died of love. and suddenly a terrible blow of fate, at the very pinnacle of success. gradually captured him, yet he remained a courageous man to the end. upon learning of the fatal diagnosis, he called us to the dacha. we left for a fun report with barin, as klyuev jokingly called himself. it turned out that this was the final confession, which, as happens with people, was exclusive with dmitry borisov, premiered on saturday on the first. the season premiere, let's go,

well, here's the mayor, for now, as they say, i'll get ready. he doesn’t mind, actually i’m against it. kovalev is a knowledgeable, experienced employee, i’m ready to work under him, i’m working with you, and this is with the help of vm? yes, and i can teach you this, he gave me the price of jealousy, he says, i winked at kovalev, here’s the circle, we have new murder, we are all slowly going crazy. found something, but no, where? i won’t bother you, he’ll drag us all down with him, maybe he was once a brilliant cherkasy, but now he’s just a stubborn old man, but maybe you want me to report? can i say that? no, i won’t, you will, and we won’t dig up your old affairs. from november 13

after the program, time is first. there's a big game on the air. the united states has a tendency where you have a hard time finding a solution, but it involves unpleasant trade-offs. especially under the current administration, there is a tendency to send aircraft carriers. but this is happening now. two carrier groups have already been sent, one around the aircraft carrier under. name gerald ford, another dwight eisenhower, by the way, two presidents who have very four cruise missiles, and here the question arises, this is being done in order to keep someone from the military world against israel, for example, hezbollah, for example iran,

maybe someone - something else, or is this really being done so that... the united states is a participant in the conflict, and maybe they want intimidate moscow, the saturation of american objects in the middle east, it is ahead of the rest, even if the turks close incerlik, this is an american military base, a key military base in the odana region, on the mediterranean coast, one or two squadrons are based there, the number of aircraft is not that large, but as an air base for the conflict in the middle east, it may have played a key role at one time, but there are a lot of reconnaissance and surveillance facilities there, that is, turkey in this regard, if the united states will decide to intervene in this conflict, it is, in general, irreplaceable, so this is another one of erdogan’s trump cards, now

regarding the two aircraft carrier groups, you know, when geralf of the support ships approached there, that is, this is such a fairly strong group, well, i also thought that this was some kind of signal to iran, what can i say, don’t interfere, but then - this build-up of force was cut off when esenhower came up, well, in addition to airplanes, ford has 90 airplanes there at insignhow 75, this is quite an aviation group , plus not... reminiscent of how the americans were preparing their invasion of iraq, several were also going there, yes , another aircraft carrier group approached the persian gulf, there too, i read today, a nuclear submarine is also going there, that is, this group, in

the mediterranean sea in the persian gulf, all this reminds that the americans are really preparing for direct intervention , because it is possible to simply concentrate such forces in order to send a signal to iran, but it seems to me that this is redundant, so apparently the americans have fear that israel, at the end of the country, the king of jordan said that any resettlement of the palestinians would mean a declaration of war on jordan, in general , it is very difficult to defeat israel in the middle east by military means, because israel, of course, logically in its armament, in its armament main types of weapons and military equipment , it is superior, of course, to the arab countries, the whole

history of the middle east conflict shows that, well, in 7, it seems , syria and egypt united, struck with the two sides still lost , so to speak, by letting israel sort it out, first with egypt, then with syria. therefore, i think that after all, iran, well, first hezbollah, although there is no special desire, in my opinion, iranian, it is not visible, but theoretically i would not exclude such a possibility. okay, so you see, vitaly, from your point of view, there is a desire to take advantage of it. armada, in order to strike iran, they talked about this for a long time in tel aviv in jerusalem, if not, not a direct collision, it still

will suffer, and i think that this is the last thing that is needed today, excuse me, not tanyahu, who is so rapidly losing his reputation, well , all sorts of transfer plans, as it used to be called in the forties, when they wanted to resettle palestinians, first to iraq, to late forties. it was mosheshat’s idea , a representative told us about this and so on, but now new proposals are constantly being made all the time, now austria and the czech republic have offered to buy the europeans to forgive debts, more precisely to egypt 156 billion, and for this egypt will open the gates and accept all the palestinians, this is how the barter turns out, which is offered by these so-called there, well, not neutrals, of course. one of them is in any case neutral, but not at all, i remember perfectly, although it was almost 40 years ago, a meeting with experts

on the middle east at the state department, which was organized by secretary of state george shultz, and regen had just also sent the american armada, everything it was in order to help... schultz must give him his due, he expressed his opinions less, he listened more. but his whole tone said, the whole nature of his questions, that he was very, very concerned about this creeping escalation, the creeping escalation in this case, this is mine, it all turned out for the united states. and so i want to ask a question, both to you and to the senator, two possible

ways out of the crisis that we see today, one, the united states will really impress everyone with its power, if it does not resolve the crisis, at least it will be able to bring it under control and this... and the second possibility, that on the contrary, is circumcision weapons, that it will get out of control and will have, not only for the united states, but for the entire region, very unpleasant consequences. let's go to advertising now and then we'll talk about the possibility of both pacification and escalation. if we take it globally, i think that few people know who slavsky is. bomb, nuclear energy, education, medicine, all the elements that made it possible to say that

sredmash is a state within a state, imagine, to manage such an industry, there is no uranium, there is nothing, everything had to be created, this is what kind of responsibility he had, should have, and most importantly, you need to be able to make a decision. you often send people to their deaths, this is radiation, this is radiation sickness, it stands tall, where are you going down, the devil knows what is there? was very heavily irradiated, he believed that the main work of his life was to create slavsky, the titan of the atomic age, the premiere, today on the first. trotsky , tomorrow, after the program time, you look, motador, carnival cancels all social

rules, he knows no prejudices, wearing a carnival costume, everyone can have therapy my psychoanalyst's name is carnival, in carnival there are no social differences, life is so complicated, we have no reason to celebrate at all, but suddenly carnival comes, people start dancing sambla, it's so wonderful to live the carnival in rio. matador. fever in rio, on friday everything turns upside down. there is a big game on the air, so what do you think, academician naumkin, how can this crisis be resolved? it seems to me that the americans will not undertake any large-scale military actions with

participation. such a huge armada and such local regional players from above, rather, it seems to me, it is designed to mortally frighten those who are here in this region, and even more so, any such action, it seems to me, will cause reputational costs not only for israel, because it already bears such costs, but also for the united states, it seems to me that the united states... is still designed for a psychological effect rather than for preparation for a serious operation, as was the case in the case of the desert storm with iraq and so on. thank you, senator, you know, as one patriarch said, of the theater business, they scare me, but i’m not scared, this is exactly what we are facing, no one, it seems to me, i may be mistaken, personal opinion, but no one

is threatened by this... he doesn’t feel the armada, although you can probably put it together, talk about iran there and so on, and israel , in my opinion, does not consider this as really serious support in its business, look, those forces that have come together are on this tiny spot, and those who are already head-to-head, i mean hamas and tsakhal, sit there kakbala or in the barracks, in the barracks. like iran, they, firstly, are all very well prepared and trained, secondly, they are all well armed, including with the most modern weapons, thirdly, and most importantly, most importantly, they are very highly motivated, there is nothing you can do about it , very little time has passed, so if and when someone, any of these, talk about something, so far, unfortunately, we see a complete dead end, the american... armada, it’s not something that

will help there or it won't help, she just doesn't play role, i agree with the senator that, in general, the impression is that no one is especially afraid of the american armada, american threats are not taken literally, general omrology, stanislavsky said that if a gun hangs on the wall, then most likely it will fire . this is such an armada coming there, it seems to me that this could have serious consequences, no, you know, this could have consequences, but you know , on the other hand, a comparable enemy for such an armada, because to fight hamas, uh, with the help aircraft carriers or erase, erase, iran is the only militarily comparable force that can oppose, uh, a similar force of this

group, i repeat once again, vitaly vyacheslavovich also confirmed that iran, the iranian leadership does not really want to be drawn into direct confrontation, nisraila that israel can , after all, statements by the leadership of iran were made, the minister of foreign affairs made a couple of statements that the red lines are almost... crossed and iran is already ready, that is, anything can happen, but then, then this is, firstly, a conflict takes on a completely different dimension. this is no longer a palestinian-israeli conflict, this is not even an arab-israeli conflict, this is a muslim- israeli conflict, and moreover, for the united states, and even on the eve of elections, on the one hand in europe, ukraine, on the other hand,

if the united states begins direct military intervention in the middle east conflict, i think that this will finish off biden, it will finish off the hopes of the democrats for some kind of trouble in the elections, it will be very, well, in iraq, only they bought hussein’s republican guard there and entered baghdad there and won, but if they had resisted, i still don’t know how the fight ended, we didn’t mention one country that is very important for the prospects of peaceful regulation, and this is egypt, which you senator know well, and uh, professor... not on the territory of jordan, the west bank , after all, to egypt from the territory of gaza, in jordan, and so 2/3 of the inhabitants are palestinians, palestinians, yes, it is generally realistic from your point of view, for egypt to agree accept

these 2 million, or at least something like that, well you know, you need to know egypt better and be an expert in this field, which i am not, but in my personal case , egypt will resist this. to the end, egypt has a lot of internal problems, don’t underestimate it, it’s a burden for him , well, well, there’s just no need to get, well, i don’t know, from somewhere bringing a cancerous tumor into your own body from the outside, well, that ’s - to me it’s just suicide, perhaps academician naunkin will not agree with this, but i agree, i’m approximately, okay, i have the last question: what if i don’t have evidence for what i’m about to say, but what if the main motive of the biden administration is not even to intimidate iran and hezbollah, but to show

that america has such military power in one country, and russia is so tied up in ukraine in another, then i’m sure that if washington followed this path, it would have very serious consequences, including for the biden administration itself, but at the same time, don’t you think that this could be a serious motive for, if you like, this ostentatious aggressiveness of the biden administration, yes, it’s quite likely that the administration is rushing about, external reasons, considerations and arguments with internal ones and its own audience to... show that all these monstrous military expenses at the expense of those who pay taxes are not in vain, in my opinion , this is the only thing that can be, well, at least some role will play in all this , although ukraine, excuse me, that ukraine is convincing that this is in vain, in fact, absolutely, please

note, it uses tactics, the experience of this rather short period historical standards,