[000:00:00;00] a small but layer of freethinkers who began to say that in general, this is not only ineffective, but also, so to speak , against conscience, so many people thought about it, well, the masons, for example, also thought about it, by the way, uh , thought that in general this would be very good, and some even set their peasants free altogether, but at the same time, they said that, strictly speaking, neither the peasant nor society itself is ready for this, and how i remember they gave such a parallel, here’s a bird, which was raised in a cage, and which is accustomed to receiving food regularly, but if this bird is suddenly released into the wild, and there is frost and hunger, then it will die, therefore, and society should be cleaner, because

otherwise...' she is this unfortunate peasant who will be released into this dirty society, it will simply corrupt him or ruin him, so to speak, so we should wait, we must do it, but we must wait, this discussion is about whether serfdom should be abolished, or is it not time yet, it lasted for a very very long time in russia, the order catherine of the legislative commission, yes, we are in the sixty-seventh year, 767, catherine ii uses in the order in relation to serfdom, the phrase serfdom itself only appeared for the first time, but she also mentions slavery, calls serfdom itself slavery, proposes to abolish it, how the nobility reacts to this, my god, in no case , when catherine saw a similar reaction, of course, from such ideas, educational ideas, she was brought up on the ideals

of enlightenment, corresponded and met with dedro corresponded with walter, voltaire’s library and so on, however, catherine immediately abandoned these plans, well , when they discussed the famous order, yes, when a question suddenly arose, they discussed it very freely, i must say that catherine gave the opportunity to discuss any questions, and even asked for all sorts of orders from the provinces and so on, that is, this was , well, probably the first in our history, a truly meticulous analysis, so to speak, of the situation, during the discussion of this he punishes when the topic arose emancipation of the peasants, the conversation instantly went astray to the completely opposite side, they asked, so to speak, to allow them to have serfs, merchants, cossacks, they wanted an additional church and so on, that is, uh,

catherine understood perfectly well. that, well, she still felt like she wasn’t quite a russian empress, this also had its effect, of course, she behaved very carefully, and in general she believed that her phrase, no matter what we did, everything i won’t do is a drop in the ocean in russia , so to speak, so change something it’s very difficult, russia is not ready, he acted , so to speak, for a very long time, and under catherine herself, serfdom only became stricter. it is forbidden for serfs to complain about landowners, with whom? under catherine, yes, serfs can be given up as soldiers at the request of the landowner, this is a punitive measure , the most violent ones can be exiled to siberia at the request of the landowner, that is, without a corresponding court decision, in fact, this was also under catherine, that is, a truly golden age serfdom, with it, moreover, it is often accused of

the tightening of serfdom by peter i, without land, serfs first began to be sold under fyodor, again under his predecessor, not immediately after the cathedral code, a little later, a generation later, just in the seventies and early eighties of the 17th century, and this continues, russians newspapers, there is a second advertisement for the sale of serfs without land, and this is really such semi-slavery, in fact, the first one who tries to touch this, yes, symbolically, pavel, of course, yes, pavel, well, that is, he is dorksya was the first to enter such a forbidden zone, yes, although, well, pavel had a lot of things, he tried to fight inflation and so on , a mythologized figure, by the way, it would also be very interesting to talk about personality, he was such a don kihod , this is what would happen in spain if donquejode came to power, how many mills he would destroy, so to speak, and so on, here is paul, approximately our donquixote, although he

was just caricatured... including, among other things, for trying to touch on the christian issue, paul tried, well, first of all, he there really wasn’t any time, really. you already mentioned this, finally, nicholas i, who also believed that serfdom, he said that i don’t understand at all how it happened that they became slaves, so to speak, but at the same time he also understood perfectly well that now to touch on this topic, the matter is dangerous, steps have been taken, pavel, to take the oath, that is, for the first time, peasants, some kind of slaves who can be exiled, about whom it is forbidden to complain, because the story, remember, of the famous saltychikha who mocked christians, she was eventually exiled and deprived of her rights for what?

because the other landowners reported on her, fearing that when the peasants came to cut her up, already driven to complete despair by the perverted tortures that she inflicted, they would also be cut, yes, but not because the peasants said anything. paul i gives them the opportunity to take the oath and he tries to reduce the corvee, he issues a decree on a three-day corvee, which of course, as we understand, remained on paper, alexander i decree of free farmers, yes, when can they be released serfs, an interesting story, in my opinion about sheremetyev, one of the richest people in russia, according to the decree on free farmers, it means that a peasant , a capitalist peasant, who himself already has a business, as we would say now, who is wealthy, comes to him, drinks to him at my feet there, i don’t remember how long. there are 10,000 rubles, a gigantic sum at that time, let the priest go, he says, i don’t need your money, i have a reception, you give me oysters in winter, if you really want freedom like that, on telelegs, where oysters were brought in heated barrels

, almost from italy, these oysters were brought and shrememetev received free money, in general this is a wonderful exchange, such barter freedom on ustrytsa, brilliant, there are only two in russia. slaves of the sovereign autocrat and slaves of farmers, but the only free people in russia can be beggars and philosophers , spiransky said this, i want to insert one more detail here, serf russia is , first of all, central russia, because speaking of alexander i, we there was already poland, was, finland, that is, the core of serfdom is central russia, in the west and in the asian, so to speak, additions to russia, and even some national, so to speak , siberian places there, so when we

just need this note, when we say serf russia, we need i can still imagine this geography, after all, alexander i went on an experiment, he abolished serfdom in the baltic provinces of iceland or ifland, abolished it. and many then hoped that he had canceled it, this was a rehearsal, and then there will be abolition in russia, yes, but no, yes, but no, which prompted the abolition of serfdom, finally, because nicholas was the first to really understand, he said that serfdom is evil, you are absolutely right, but abolishing it would still be a great evil, he is afraid of the revolution, but attempts to restrain the revolution ultimately led russia to a severe defeat in the crimean war, russia has not lost wars on its territory since peter ii, who is losing the war there? and loses the war, everyone understands this then in russia because of the serfs rights. alexander ii, the future tsar-liberator, who also sat on these very secret committees, sometimes took more conservative positions than his father. he

was not at all brought up as a reformer. but after the disaster, if we call a spade a spade for the then russian crimean war, russia is losing to whom? england and france with modern weapons, with factory production, infantry die from rifle fire at those distances at which it cannot approach for its effective fire, respectively, the steamships of the british and the french, the well-known story is the battle of sinopta, nakhimov destroys the turkish fleet, sank the turkish fleet, and with turkish coastal batteries, one ship escaped, an english steamer flying the turkish flag, yes, it must be cancelled, yes, yes, yes, well, you said that , that - well, they were afraid of the revolution, this is all true, and alexander... the second, when he was forced after the crimean war to undertake all sorts of reforms, and when we talk about serfdom, about the abolition of serfdom, we still need to understand, that by itself i don’t know, any decree, any

order, go free there, there is something like that, it didn’t work, so it took a very long time to develop the technology, all this, and it couldn’t just be taken and released. it was still necessary to do something with these new free people, it was necessary to help them, on the one hand, on the other hand there was the concern of the landowners themselves, they cared about their own safety, therefore... when we say great reforms, the abolition of serfdom in 1861 year, this is only part of all these reforms, well, in general, in short, this is a whole complex of reforms, therefore when we talk about the reform of the abolition of serfdom, we need to complement everything, including glasnost , it was not under gorbachev that the word appeared, the brother of alexander ii, konstantin, after the crimean war the russian fleet, he wrote about the need for

glasnost in his department in order to solve problems of restoration of this fleet, everything stems again from this failure, the impetus was given, of course, of course, first of all, why, in order to raise industry, especially the military one, free labor is needed, serfdom in the west a right that was finally achieved by the napoleonic wars; it did not imply personal ownership. the peasant himself, and the peasants could still leave and become workers in the first manufactories, then factories, and so on. our situation is different. in general, capitalism develops in the presence of three conditions, and three markets: the capital market, the availability of free capital, the labor market and the sales market. russia has problems with all three of these things. free working hands, serfs, sales market, purchasing power of the same serfs is minimal. yes, accordingly the main source of capital.

this state, it was the state that had to give this impetus and had to launch these gigantic transformations , you are absolutely right that the abolition of serfdom is only the first, huge, but the first step, then it was necessary to reform the entire edifice of the russian empire, which during the great reforms what city the kiev authorities will surrender in the near future, even if we have to withdraw from ovdeevka, this will not significantly affect the course of events. ukrainian the troops are very serious. this is one of thousands of settlements that have to be taken, how much european countries are willing to pay to expel ukrainians to their homeland, and irritate the local population, demand everything for free, fights start, and what fake zelsky angered the poles with, anti-fake, premiere, tomorrow on the first , 1 2 3 4 5, i’m leaving

to look for you. serial killers are divided into four different types, according to their motivations, one way or another, they kill because of love, you are probably a writer, this is a request for him sent, they don’t have such an employee, but do you know igor well? you don’t drink coffee, girls, no, you scare me, i love you, me, it hurts, don’t come here

anymore, what do i like? the territory will soon be on the first, maybe the tail will hang behind him, let's wait, his head is now full of others, like spiders in a jar , european politicians are eating each other, ursula vonderlein against charles michel, corruption is the driving engine of the european union, the crisis around ukraine is also great corruption. tamosel has millions in his personal pockets. i want thank you both for being here. those who rule are those who know how to negotiate and bow correctly to those guys who are sitting in washington. it is important to show solidarity with israel, the victim of the worst attack. a war in the middle east could completely break all european politics. the european street rose up, millions of people demonstrated. elon musk did. a statement that there will be a civil war in the eu. michel's strategy is not

to preserve this union, but to create colonies within this union. capitalala sensitively i understand that he is being buried in the interests of globalists. and naturally he should begin to resist. the field of future clashes between other elites. european union is a big cockroach race. dolls of the heir tutti. tomorrow on the first. this is historical. russian podcast the west is on the swing of history, today we are dealing with serfdom and the process of its abolition. just now i thought, there’s a parallel with peter the great, because... peter's reforms were forced, he created armies, this led to other reforms, the reforms of alexander ii too they are forced and one thing also leads to another, because well, a building, so to speak, without piles,

it cannot collapse, only from this side, to load or unload, and at the same time there is an interesting point that, well, at least for me... ... if i perceive the reforms of peter as a kind of greatness, a great thing, and the reforms of alexander ii, although in scale, so to speak, are quite comparable, and the reforms of alexander ii, i somehow look at them, well, how can i tell you, with regret that they were partial, although... and the reforms of peter the great were also partial, i think the difference is that peter the great, firstly, reforms began, they were of course forced for the country, but it was peter’s desire, alexey mikhailovich could also start these reforms, or fyodor alekseevich, or fyodor alekseevich,

but peter started it, he wanted it, alexander ii, as you said, finally didn’t want it. peter was catching up with the west, and al alexander ii was fleeing the revolution. there is a huge difference between catching up and running. i would still say that he fled rather from a possible external defeat, since during the crimean war the english admiralty was already making plans for the dismemberment of russia. yes, and there was also a story that the british wanted to move the fighting after crimea further into russian territory. the french said, no, you know, we already went once. deep in the twelfth year, so this is without us, and without an ally on the continent the british do not fight , so here it did not work out, here is an interesting point that the people who abolished serfdom were people who were formed in the nicholas era, including in these very secret committees, who looked at all this, who did not occupy the highest positions, but just when

this old nikolaev public was demolished by the first resignations of alexander ii, it was no longer possible to work with these people. they are removed, another generation appears, an interesting episode, one of the leaders of the editorial commissions that developed the project for the abolition of serfdom was yakov rostovtsev, the man who betrayed the decembrists, nicholas the first, but who apparently suffered from conscience all his life, and who was considered a conservative , a when he took up his post, he began to work towards a more radical abolition of the reforms, and also some historians believe that his relatively early death, he did not live to see the abolition of serfdom, led to the fact that they were abolished... in a more conservative way than, for example, milyutin and than yakov rostovtsiv assumed, that is, he thus atone for the guilt of betrayal by implementing what the decembrists wanted to do, this is an interesting question, these reforms, this

influence of the west, if we are talking about west, or is this an example of the west, i found here, the opinion of one analyst from the nineties, there was such a comrade, and he wrote the following: if you don’t delve too deeply into history and don’t bother the shadow of peter the great, what are you and me doing, the beginning of our westernization is associated with reforms alexandra ii. well, this is some kind of very radical point of view, because the nineties, well, the nineties, yes, uh, westernization, relative, because the conditions under which serfdom was directly abolished are very important here. yes, here we go. we remember these conditions, conditions caused mass discontent among the peasants, when they announced a decree on getting rid of serfdom, an imperial decree, then the troops in the russian empire were put on alert because they expected unrest, unrest followed, for a russian peasant freedom without land is like for us, freedom is without

air, the russian peasant does not think of this, but the peasant received the land for a ransom, and the ransom was determined, here it is very. land, and according to the size of the quitrent that the peasant paid to the landowner before the abolition of serfdom, the quitrent should be capitalized based on 6% per annum, that is, one quitrent, you can draw a formula like this, but the annual quitrent is 6% of the redemption, respectively, if the quitrent was, for example, 10 rubles, then the peasant had to pay 166 rubles 67 kopecks of these the peasants had no trace of money, so the ransom that the peasants had to pay for... was paid by the state, the peasant contributed only 20%, the rest was paid for by the state, and the state, now many viewers will probably remember about the mortgage, yes 49 years peasants had to... well, from generation to generation , the state had to pay the same interest again, and if they didn’t even

have 20%, they remained temporarily obliged, and only after the liquidation of the temporarily obliged state in 1881, they finally became free , if the peasant had a desire to immediately free himself, he could take a couple of dessiatines, leave the rest of the land to the landowner, while, as he called him, he received this chicken allotment free, many peasants did this, why? because they thought that this is not a real will, not a royal one, and then there will be a real royal will , they will give all the land, so now there is no need to agree to a buyout operation, and that’s not all, the yard peasants were not given land, almost as many as there were 5 -6%, remember firs in the cherry orchard , who said that there was thunder and lightning before a great misfortune, before which, the interlocutor asks him, firs answers: before the will, for him the will is a trouble, why? because he is a yard servant,

a landowner of the yard peasants, just throw it away street, they had to beg, and the best part of the land, one last detail, sections in the provinces, especially black earth ones, determined the maximum land that the godparents could receive, this maximum is less than the land that the peasants had previously cultivated, and the fact that the excess was cut off from 20 to 25% of the christian lands; of course, the christians were unhappy. i found this here, i just want to read something, this is from a letter addressed to alexander, prince boratynsky, this is 1871, and he wrote that the last word of the reform will be said when the complete liberation of the russian people will reach the individual, abolish private property. and you will strangle the birth of communism, strengthen family morality, and lead the country along the path of progress. there is no stronger guarantee for legal

advancement than property and personal freedom. so here is alexander ii. i saw this letter and responded through count shuvalov. he writes to the prince: i am happy that i can from now on predict the serious future of the great, useful idea of ​​\u200b\u200bthe exercise of second slavery. perhaps worse than a serf, communal use of land, i have no doubt that a significant majority will speak out in the sense of your views, then the matter will be won in spite of all the st. petersburg reds, who in this case will not be prepared to give a big battle, since all their future hopes will perish with the destruction of this social and socialist ulcer , it’s interesting that already at that time we were talking about the reds, about socialist ideas, about communism, communism, yes, that is

, the authorities understood, but, but did nothing, but did not do, did what they decided to do, on the contrary, it only preserved the community, including why it is easier to collect fiscal interests, taxes from the community, and will reach the community, in the sense of an attempt to abolish it only... stalypin, when from my point of view it will be to a large extent simply too late, yes , yes, according to the analysis of a number of western specialists who visited russia, analyzed, so to speak, the stalepin reform, they just wrote that, well, in general, everything is going great, and in a few years, if all this is implemented at all, russia in general it will be invincible as they believed, they wrote so, so stalepin in some, in some sense... he won the battle, he lost the war, but he lost

the war to god chronus. today we are dealing with the issue of the abolition of serfdom, this is a historical podcast, russia and the west on the swing of history. the main problem was that serfdom was abolished, but a whole series of, as they used to say, and indeed, this is quite an appropriate term, remnants of serfdom remained, they... well, they looked at completely differently all these questions, so to speak, even the most advanced, as they say now, individuals, i found such a moment here, the landowner of the magazine, defended the interests of the nobility , insisted that everything should be left as it is. the magazine economic index recommended that the authorities follow western

experience, that is, they stood on the side of personal land ownership. influential magazines sovremennik and russian conversation, advocated communal land ownership, but for completely different reasons, the contemporary saw in the russian community something like a western commune, which perhaps it will allow russia to jump into socialism, bypassing the phase of wild capitalism, slavophiles, from russian conversation, saw in the community a kind of sacred umbilical cord that connects the russian people with their ancient slavic past, so it was simply impossible to satisfy all this diversity of opinions of everyone. you can turn to economics, look at the results, and indeed, at first there will be some decline associated with the restructuring of economic life, but subsequently russia is picking up the pace of economic growth, thanks to the abolition serfdom, having taken the capitalist track, free labor appears;

by the way, it is important to add here that very cheap labor, yes. received the least amount of work in europe, but thanks to this, thanks to these reforms, thanks to subsequent financial and economic reforms that formalized the development of capitalism, russia at the end of the 19th century took third place in the world in terms of economic growth, second only to the usa and germany, and sometimes going nose to nose with germany, nevertheless, the mina existed, lenin wrote in his time, yes you can refer to the authority of vladimir ilyevich that 1861 gave birth to 905, what did he mean? what do the peasants demand in 905 ? abolition of sections, landowners' land, because the peasant continued to believe that the land is no one's land, god's land, and god 's means peasant, the land should belong only to the one who works on it, that's what left these very annoying things for the peasants, that's it these segments, these redemption payments, canceled only as a result of the first russian revolution, until that moment the peasants continued to pay

and overpay, by the way, for the higher market value of land, this all led to the radicalization... of russian peasantry and led to the radicalization of christian youth, but russia then at the end of the 19th, beginning of the 20th century, the demographic factor, is a very young country, average , who is the average russian? this is a young peasant, 17-19 years old, who understands that in the current situation , he has generally no prospects in life, after the abolition of serfdom, such a thing began, well, i already said that alexander ii. run away from revolution, radical forces in russia began to run towards the revolution and such a race for survival began to a large extent , because after the abolition of serfdom in connection with the discontent that you are talking about, populists, they were waiting, so to speak, for a peasant socialist revolution, that on the wave of discontent, the peasants will begin

to speak out, at the christening, with all their discontent, nevertheless... they were not ready to overthrow the tsar’s father at that moment, faith in the good tsar did not go away, did not disappear, that’s why they called it christ passive material, so an idea arose, these little guys who didn’t want to flare up, set it on fire with the help of terror, in fact, from there, from those times, the story begins about using the most radical methods to rock russia. i don’t completely agree here, because after all, the reaction of terror appeared as a reaction to the very brutal suppression of going to the people, the process of 1993, yes, when there were some people who were acquitted by the consequences, this is a simultaneous process, in fact, therefore, this, in a significant place , was largely in the nature of some kind

of revenge, of course, and this too, the end of the reformer. we know, as a result, the grenewitzsky bomb, yes, several attempts, unsuccessful, and then, yes, a successful attempt , this period, or something, i would put an end to here, because then the period of the outright freezing of alexander ii begins, this is already a separate song, to a large extent, this is about and a separate song, well , the unsuccessful reign of the last russian emperor, the victorious people extended over russia owl wings after the eighty-first year, now we understand that without the abolition of serfdom in russia there simply might not have been, because the corresponding plans, as we have already said, there were plans for partition, and the lag became

disastrous, but what next. .. the agrarian question, the main question of russia, because the bulk of the population is a village, it is a peasantry, they tried not to touch it, they tried to freeze it in every possible way, this played a role, of course, we have already talked about this, but it is very important to emphasize again , played subsequently a disastrous role, because this main issue remains in the first russian revolution, in the seventeenth year even too , that is, this stretches until the seventeenth year, this is a problem with the agrarian question, of course , of course, of course, i think that the topic of serfdom, it before - as you said, it lasts until the age of 17, it largely predetermined the entire... the further path of russia played its role,

generally completely negative before the abolition, and negative, due to half-measures, half-liberation, which contributed to radicalization, so to speak , v principle of russian society, which, first of all, as you correctly noted, consisted of peasants, so yes, this is a very important point, and yes, if russia had not carried out the abolition of serfdom, it had a chance to collapse altogether, these are half measures in the end as a result, they largely detonated in 1917, this is a historical podcast, russia and the west are on the swing of history, today we will deal with the issue of the abolition of serfdom, pyotr romanov and sergei solovyov were with you, study history with us, all episodes of the historical podcast the russian west on the swing of history can

be viewed on the website of the first channel 1 tv.ru. the power of memory is great; there is something terrifying in the diversity of its countless depths. this is what avreli augustine wrote in his famous confession. hello, today we have gathered our thoughts about memory, about its secrets and mysteries. dmitry petrovich bak, literary scholar, candidate of philological sciences, evgeniy germanovich vodolasin, writer, doctor of philological sciences. friends, i’m very glad to see you, it’s mutual, with whom if not with you to talk about such a topic, and you know, i want, i have a preliminary question, is it a warm-up question, is memory more about hope

or curse? evgeniy germanovich, well, memory is something that you often want to get rid of, in fact it is so, sometimes you want to forget many things. therefore, in some ways there is a trace of the curse, but memory, it gives hope in the sense that if it is a good memory, a good memory, then they give hope that something will happen again. you know, after all, i would put hope in the foreground, because well, we we know, yes, the curse of the family, which can weigh down, hang until... itself, it is definitely there, yes, because the golden age gives way to the silver, and then all the way to the iron one, but nothing good happens to the world, so always - memory speaks of

curse, but on the other hand, memory speaks of the best, precisely because the past is happy - this is childhood, for example, it almost always has a shade of happiness of a sinless, transparent existence, and the more you remember, the more you hope that you are living in every moment in its completeness. and not in that incompleteness that seems right to you in the vanity, i just now, when evgenia gernovich, you said that sometimes you want to get rid of something, but i thought, i remembered, or rather the thought, not my thought, about what confession is , this is a cry to god, lord, don’t remember me like this, that is, don’t remember me committing this act, forget, well, it’s funny to ask god to forget something, but that’s the whole idea... well, not repentance, but repentance is probably based, no, moreover, i believe that repentance, confession, is

overcoming time, you return to the time before sin, as it were, because this sin is washed away, it goes away, the only difference is this, you return to the old time, but with the memory of sin, this is already a hint of the absence of time, of absence. .. before and after, and there is simply a repentant sin, and there may be a desire to prevent it. again , it is washed off, but the scars remain, the scars remain , well, the famous line of pushkin, but there are options for sad or shameful lines, i don’t wash it off, yes, this is a very important story, because that even if you want to get rid of the memory, i agree with my wife, then the work is not to get rid of it, but to understand that it was given for a reason, well, because there are no tests beyond one’s strength, we understand perfectly well, even if it is a bad memory, a memory of a sinful

state. then anyway, it is not given in order to be equal to it, memory is what makes us unequal to ourselves in the best sense, but look how naturally we will now move on to the actual substantive part of the concept, equal not equal, here is yuri mikhailovich lotman said that a person is a memory, a culture is a memory, i always tell students, to justify this, you don’t need a lot of evidence, imagine that you wake up tomorrow and don’t remember anything. yes, what you don’t remember is not there, that is, it turns out that memory is a culture-forming phenomenon, excuse the involuntary academicism, and a person-forming phenomenon, and the question then is, but still a person is identical to memory, either by forgetting, or not ? there is wisdom unburdened by knowledge, that's who

old people, wise people, dealt with, in old age a person, sometimes, he does not remember any... things, but at the same time he is wise, he is absolutely error-free in his choice, although he can no longer justify it in any way, maybe something like that tolstoy meant when he said that when a person leaves for another world, he takes with him memory, but memory not of specific events, but memory as a certain sum of ideas of good and evil, this is a certain extract that already exists in isolation from events, then there is the memory of an old man , the memory of a child, i don’t mean that a person falls into childhood at some point, i mean more in this sense, we are approaching our beginning, so this is the same lack of fullness of memory as in childhood, but only after, with experience, experience does not

disappear anywhere, speaking in at the beginning, when you said not burdened by memory, i grinned, because another associative series arose for me, yes, that there is a lot of wisdom, a lot of sadness, i thought that you were talking about this, but you are talking about something completely different, yes, about wisdom, which is filled with sadness, probably in some sense, yes, but now about some individual episodes can afford to not remember, yes, yes, absolutely right, i don’t know the etymology , but i’ll be such a preobrazhensky or fast improviser, it seems to me that this is... to catch and take memory, yes, it is always selective, you can’t remember everything, and zhenya is absolutely right and wise here, yes, that is, we are not talking about some details, episodes, they can also be remembered, but it is important that memory constructs itself, yes, i will return my previous thought, it changes me, but the task a person to remember himself as correct, in addition to, well, all the extraneous things, you know, man,

very often he still captures different... in his life, a believer, he thinks about how to preserve the main thing in himself, correctly in a moral sense, again to what we were talking about, it happens, yes, to catch himself correctly, in there are different things in life, there are delusions, there are sins, but it is important to catch the construct to see the right one about yourself, because i am the same boy who hid under the blanket from his mother and read books, i am the same boy who will not be a boy, but when something will die at this moment, like all of us, yes, but it’s important to remember yourself correctly, this will be allowed at any second , yes, absolutely right, we said, by the way, before the start of the adante program, he has an amazing plot, i’m not sure if it ’s found anywhere else in this form, it has two rivers, summer and evnoya, yes, uh, summer is a river that washes away bad memories, then a person moves to evnoya, which is nearby, in general flows, it consolidates the good. reason, yes, if i

demologize correctly, again, well, yes, reason, reason, yes, yes, that’s probably true, maybe maybe this is a system, and it should work like this, who knows, dante, in general, was not such a specifically spiritual authority, but the very idea of ​​something like this is very close to me, because... even the idea of ​​hell, there is an opinion that hell is the inability to get away from bad memories, that when you see all the beauty. stupid, then at this moment you become incredibly ashamed of yourself, this memory, it burns, maybe this is it, well, this is what chagin suffers from in your novel of the same name, yes, that is, this this is actually, i took it as an experience of hellish torment, and

he does not know how to forget, he cannot forget his forgetting , this is really so, absolutely true, he either, like judas, must hang himself, and either repent, so he repents, and the sincerity of this repentance allows him to come up with a new odissi poem , in which he gives his new life, i am far from convincing the reader that he just needs to rewrite, no, he needs to repent, and then as such a gift, maybe, maybe maybe, i’m not saying, it’s more of a question, you can, uh, uh... get away from bad memories, stay with good ones before death, it's time to recharge the thyroid gland - the battery of our body, cheese from the mountains, how to choose the right real addyge cheese,

fill your eyes, hemorrhage in the eye we will help, program to live healthy , looks at everything through the prism of science, at the first premiere of the season, what kind of katran did you do there, and where is mine? we went to the corpse, but there was household stuff there, kovalev, viktor sergeevich, mayor, i hope to be useful to you, there were definitely two of them, yes, two glasses, two utensils and that’s what they met i used to do this, so i decided to take up amateur activities before retirement, robert, i repeat to you again, hands behind your back, on the floor, i was not aware that the house was under surveillance, uncle van, but we seem to have one murder, ionova, opera singer, and in her apartment she has the same sign as our alcoholic, maniac,

you think, i’m forbidden to use this word, you won’t be saved, great, comrade, there was a maniac, and now a whole sect of maniacs, brains. cherkasov's last case, well, boss, here we go, tomorrow, after the program time, on the first. hot ice, live broadcasts,

november 18 and 19, on the first, love figure skating, appreciate figure skating, adore figure skating. today we gathered our thoughts about memory, its secrets and mysteries. dmitry petrovich bak, evgeny germanovicholan, i’m vladimir legoyda, let’s continue. but look, memory is not only that we forget something, but that we remember something. by and large , augustine writes about this. he says that this is such a palace in which memories are stored that are either an understatement or an exaggeration, in any case, the interpretation of this word is not a construction, selectivity or reality. and so. i actually have this question in a broad sense, in a narrow sense, a little narrower, then the question is about the value of memoirs as historical documents, because in general, what are memoirs, this is the memory

of an individual person, and the memoirs of another contemporary about the same events will be different ,