that's it, there is a suspect, the man saw how his neighbor was drawing cereal, sonya, will you stay on the phone, well, finally, glad, glad , hello veche, hello, hello, dear, hello, i need to catch my mother. let's go, let's go , i'm coming, i'm coming, andryush, you forgot your keys, criminal investigation department, who are you, look, what do you want?

viktor sergeevich, here is the evening capital, signs, chemical pencil, well, everything is here, look, gala peredol, knife, syringes, you need to inform cherkasov, so directions to other departments, urgently, call an ambulance, you’ll get yourself a shepherd dog, one professor, him they gave him a chance to go to israel. he’s in a hurry, i think he’ll give it away inexpensively, van, agree, there are such apple trees there, you don’t even need to plant them, well, if you don’t need to plant anyone, i agree, so, rit, he agrees, or do i have hearing problems, do you have hearing problems , give me the professor’s phone number, we need to look for it, vanya, it’s not my fault, vanka, vanka, how old dasha is, you and i are.

everything is ahead, well, i’m on my way, no, well, you really agree, i promised you , this is the last thing, well, vanechka, you’ll have a dacha, and damn, you idiots, tell cherkasov, he’s next, that’s it.

i'll come again. there is a big game on the air, today president vladimir putin spoke via video link, addressing the extraordinary brix summit , where the idea, which is now already supported by a significant part of the states, and not only from the south, not only associated with russia, but in general, this has become an idea that even... it is difficult for israel to reject, but while

negotiations continue, hopes are growing, and we will see what, or more precisely, when, they celebrate the tenth anniversary of the maidan. i think this is really very important date, this is a very important date, because from my point of view, president putin is absolutely right when he says. that the military conflict in ukraine, that it did not begin with a special operation, but it began, which brought to power people who essentially appointed themselves, appointed themselves with great help from the west. i haven’t been to kiev for a long time, i don’t have personal impressions

, but it so happened that a person whom i know very well and whom i completely trust, who was like some kind of door, enters then comes out of there and for some reason counts the money, well he decided to inquire, went upstairs, and indeed, there were some people there who gave money themselves, this is not hearsay, and this is not a person inclined to everything else, we also saw with our own eyes, we saw cookies from the us deputy secretary of state, we saw frank, incendiary calls from senator john mccain, and so did we, it turned out

from the west, and especially from washington, against president yanukovych, he did not use force and that he should be extremely careful in his movements when dealing with protesters, and i will say the latter, again, this is not at the level of what we heard, at the level, they themselves say, this is a compromise solution, in the united states it is absolutely open at the level of the administration, at the level of the leadership of congress. warned that those officials, those oligarchs who would advocate continuing the resistance, and that they would not find it enough, and that the most serious sanctions were being imposed against them, also took part in

the negotiations, but not at the level of a direct participant in this process, at the level of the russian observer, well western ministers... russia sent vladimir petrovich lukin, who was then the special presidential representative for human rights. vladimir petrovich, i can’t say anything bad about him, except good, but this is a person who embodies the love of peace, it was obvious that if russia had used its pressure to force yanukovych to use force, then vladimir petrovich would have been the wrong person , who was entrusted with a similar mission, russia, i don’t want to say that there was trust in the collective west, but there wasn’t that

mistrust, which was suffered through the subsequent sad experience, it was, had to be built up. so that they understand to what extent it was impossible to trust the west, as we call them now, a former partner, but one more thing, in intervention, in moscow, from my point of view, it was quite reasonable, they did not want to make sudden movements that could be used against russia , but at least, from my point of view, there was only one and absolutely irrelevant conclusion. a bloody coup d'état, in no way provoked by russia, which led to only to a change, to a situation where instead of the previous position, when they said that ukraine values ​​​​its neutrality, to a new

position, which boils down to the fact that ukraine absolutely cannot live without nato, this is such a wonderful situation in quotes. senator, what do you think we should remember from the lessons of the maidan approach to the current crisis around ukraine? yes, this, in my opinion, is a very sad date, because i remember very well november of the thirteenth year, when events developed, i remember there was such a journalist with ukraine, tsymbalyuk, he often attended our president’s meetings with the press, so i remember i wrote dill on one t-shirt, i wrote it on my t-shirt, so he told me then, we had a meeting in the parliamentary newspaper, he says: well, what kind of you are we friends, you

are now building mistrals in france, and not to build these mistrals here at the nikolaev shipyard, then we would be friends, would you think about our workers? by the way, i want to tell you that when all this was discussed, there were no longer any shipyards in nikolaev, that’s all was destroyed and looted, by the way, life has shown that no one got these mistrals, in the end, in my opinion, the french sold them to egypt, yes, but with our helicopters, with our helicopters, look, we closely monitored the development of the situation, because her first visit as speaker of the soviet union was friendly, when she and i talked about our bilateral relations, about joining the customs union, the eurasian union. and he said, listen, let's wait for the elections of the twelfth year, it was november

on the eleventh, i assure you, we will carry out everything so as not to disturb the people now, and we will join all the agreements. and the elections took place, yanukovych was already a long-time person, against a formerly troubled senator , vladimir ivanovich for a long time, a commission for monitoring the situation in ukraine, we monitored everything that happened there, made some recommendations, conclusions, but the process developed very much. and we all remember this civilized picture, when an agreement was signed that yanukovych would resign in the fall, elections would be held, this time, power will be peacefully transferred to those who win, by the way, in the west for some reason they call it a revolution, where it is profitable for them, they say, it’s a coup, and where it is not profitable, they say, on the contrary, and where it is beneficial for them, they say that this was a revolution, and what happened in... i could n’t even imagine then how dramatically life in ukraine would change, how they would treat everything russian,

with what hatred, the most unchanging feelings that existed spread throughout cities and villages of ukraine, took lizing positions and in fact, that’s when the anti-russian project began to be created in full, thank you, ukraine under yanukovych was in no way a lackey of russia, i don’t know if you agree with this, it wasn’t, in general, ukraine could go in the direction of the west, like in general, in my opinion , i was trying to just go a little. and of course with caution to avoid a conflict with moscow, but in general, it would

seem to me, why else, it seems to me, moscow did not expect, there was a ukrainian president who still represented mainly the eastern, russian-speaking part of ukraine, but at the same time i wanted to go to the west, without big conflicts, without strain, without complications, why did i have to choose it? i think that in my opinion, the west had reasons, that is, it completely, in russia began with the coming to power of vladimir putin, and which gradually, gradually, but intensified, this is an orientation towards sovereignty, measuring at what pace, with enormous, of course, delays , mistakes, waste, but nevertheless, in terms of module, if you take the rate at which our sovereignty is growing, how russia... can stop

the interests of those who still consider themselves the only hegemonies, having measured this, they realized that now, right now, before the end of yanukovych, they need to change the rhythm, because this way it will last forever, they looked at the electoral map of ukraine, they saw how they vote confidently , the east of ukraine votes, and came to the conclusion that democracy in the conditions of a country where half is focused on russia, the other half, there was nothing but calculation in this. another thing is that you said many things were there obvious, that’s right, many things were obvious, but i am absolutely convinced that in 1914 our leadership did not suspect the true essence of the west, they wanted to be gentle, sending such benevolent humanists, communicating with the west through the interface of, in general, quite pro-western liberal groups , nevertheless, our sovereignty is in full, but there was trust in the west, and when merkel, she played here

, it seems to me, one of the most terrible roles, because in the fourteenth year after the reunification with crimea, she said, with this, let’s let's stop, let's move on to a peaceful solution, on the one hand, the west told us that without us fixing the situation , maybe we will even recognize crimea, now the sanctions will pass, on the other hand, they continued this wine of the population even... after crimea and donbass still remains quite loyal to russia, but without such massive nazi propaganda, it is impossible to create a national state. and the west is completely conscious. personally went for it, deceived us, and indeed we, these sufferings that we endured, this is the very in fact, this is the payment that we still pay for this excessive trust in the west , which the west then held, which, if you seriously look at world history, always carried it out in relation to us, always, or we were super-strong then with us

were considered, but as soon as we gave up, showed this benevolent interface towards the west, it simply strengthened its grip, i think that we underestimated it then, and this is precisely the price for this underestimation, treachery, cruelty, cynicism, will for how they underestimated you in moscow knows better than me, i admit that i was in washington, i also underestimated, i underestimated not in the sense that i had doubts about the growing hostility for, and more specifically, the obama administration towards russia, i had no doubts about that, just as i had no doubt that president obama himself, that he was a man , let’s say, cold-blooded, reasonable, and, in general, not inclined to get involved in military

conflicts unless fundamental american interests required it, so i personally not that i believe the obama administration, but i did not imagine that they would be ready to change the regime in ukraine, this was a big lesson for many of us, in moscow, in washington, your opinion, general buzhinsky, you know, speaking about this maidan , a tragic page in the history of ukraine, and you understand that the most interesting thing is that yanukovych, being, after all , a true, so to speak, ukrainian, chairs, we have a lot of sayings, there about calves that suckle two queens, and there about the chairs you can sit on, he wanted to say so, just drag out this process and at the same time receive, so to speak, billions from russia , but also from the european union, in my opinion, the west

probably didn’t like it, so to speak, the americans simply went to... to aggravate this conflict. by the way, returning to vladimir petrovich, olkin, he did not sign then this so-called compromise, which was signed there by a pole, sikorsky, uh, a german, a frenchman, he did not sign, because apparently he felt that all this would lead to a big , to great deception, what happened then, naturally, yanukovych’s fate was already a preparation to remove him from the territory of ukraine, he would simply be killed, because this was one of the legitimate of the legitimate ways, legitimate before, the legitimate transfer of power, that is, there were three cases provided for, or impeachment, which did not happen

, so to speak, there was no impeachment procedure, either a voluntary refusal , which yanukovych had no intention of doing, or he would have simply been physically destroyed, they would have said: well , well, excuse me, the revolutionary masses, what can we do, here are the people so outraged that therefore, all this - to a certain extent, legitimized, this armed, armed coup, what happened then , this is of course, uh, an agreement, all this was puke, that they simply tried to deceive us, but some people really say that both allanta and merkel tried, but then they realized that nothing was working, so they decided, so to speak, to simply stall for time at this time to transform ukraine, i think that we probably needed it, now of course it’s easy to argue, but in the fourteenth year, when the ukrainian armed forces were, in general

, from my point of view, there was no need to do this, well, all this ended, naturally, at the age of eight. died as a result of these attacks, well, it all ended with our special operation , which i hope will be brought to a victorious end, well, i want to tell you that the degree, i will be careful partners, well, when we see it now, it went off scale in the fall of 2013. where. president putin spoke and after that a small dinner was held and several people from the group were there. states and i uh sat and i putin was uncomfortable, and they poured it out there, it seemed to me that knowing and what they were saying and writing

in washington, but it seemed to me that it was at least insincere, okay, the evening, the night passes, we are all going to... train to moscow, i arrive at the national hotel, somewhere abroad, maybe the united states, i don’t remember, and this envoy came with two assistants, we didn’t hide it in any way, we met them downstairs, where they serve coffee and cocktails, like everything would be absolutely open, and i would share with them, at their request, my impressions, tell them that happened, and of course, the russian country was great... they assumed that this was sorted out, but it was supposed that i would share it with my american colleagues, and when our conversation ended, i was

told, you know, that’s interesting, we’ve already talked with two members of your group, and one of them said basically the same thing as you, that is, that it was serious... but that the russian country was showing its interest in continuing, where possible, some kind of cooperation with united states, here says one member of your group said that putin tried to manipulate, looked to dominate in some way, especially frightened women. especially frightened women, but i thought, there was no american participant there , who gave the impression of some

kind of intimidation and some even wariness , they came here, talked about how they wanted to work with russia, talked about how they personally respected just a little to meet moscow halfway. let’s say we clear up some misunderstandings regarding syria, well, probably hand over snowden, yes, that was the main thing, of course, extradite again, and, as it were, everything will be fine again, i don’t know, the person who gave such a specific assessment was the valdaikan embassy, ​​or it was quite possible he was lying, in that other case, but i just have a feeling that russia was surrounded

wall of western lies, and this cost russia something, but i think, first of all , this is very unsafe for the west, because for the second time, after this, we have to start relations with a clean sheet of paper, we somehow agreed on ukraine, achieved what something... the world in general somehow will the former more or less normal relations be restored? you know, i want to remember, or rather remind all of us, that when the maidan was going on, it could have easily been dispersed by the golden eagle, the golden eagle is the special forces of ukraine, but at the same time we remember , our president spoke about this, that obama repeatedly called our president and asked so that force is not used under any circumstances. so that no one would die, so that there would be no bloodshed, but knowing the highest integrity of the russian leader, he was confident that we would meet him halfway, especially since we were counting on

the fact that the negotiations that are going on, both the americans and the french and the poles are interested in them, we were deceived years ago, when navalny tried to organize something like a maidan, something like this, we learned this lesson, we responded harshly, the authorities must... be able to defend itself, yanukovych not only did not defend the government, he simply fled shamefully , the government that is defending today will be forced to give in to force, power to another force, so i want to say that we, of course, do not trust the west, these they lie and pretend that everything is normal, so i think that we have learned from the bitter experience of communicating with them over these past years, and i think that we will direct our faith and our efforts to make the world more just, so that ukraine gets rid of this regime that was imposed on it

, western countries, by the way, here we are talking about why the maidan happened, because in three, what happened from the nineties , a new generation of ukrainians grew up by 23 years, who studied from sores textbooks, who absorbed everything that was brought to them by all kinds of ngos, non-governmental western organizations, this generation worked on the maidan and, unfortunately, then we all forgot that heavyweights, heavyweights in the person of the neo-nazis of western ukraine, were already entering. bandera and so on, so we won’t trust anyone anymore, thank you, we are now going to advertising and after advertising we will talk about the current military situation in ukraine. i don’t know a single person with whom i would like to talk about this as much as with the general, for quite a few years now, the general

has passed the test, and many of us have been tested in battle, each of us passed this test in our own way, the general passed it, among other things, standing at this table at other programs, where, when a special operation began, at first for a short period there was euphoria of people, including invited experts and even presenters, who as it would seem to me, they should have assessed the situation more balancedly, but they had, if not panic, then something close to it, and had the gloomiest expectations from the proposed ukrainian offensive, and general buzhinsky stood like rock, and said that it provides ukraine with enormous support, but at the same time, general, correct me, have you systematically said

that ukraine... does not have the capabilities for a significant strategic offensive? do you admit it? yes, of course, yes, i don’t deny it, we’re leaving for advertising, we’ll be back in just a few minutes, a fake from ukrainian cipso children was allegedly forced to swim across a river in cold water, who would allow it? for every sneeze, in every school we need parental permission, the divers wanted to conduct it, we support our army and exclusive, why risking her career as a deputy, a resident of germany came to donbass, the place where you were born, you will probably never be able to erase it from your heart, and what she saw there, the very first big change that i saw was that people finally - there is hope, anti-fairy premiere, tomorrow on the first. bourbon.

why such torment, already 3 hours under the spotlights, here it’s +40, no less , it itches, you shouldn’t have put it on your naked body, we are royal or imperial, attention is a question, don’t be related to her, colleagues, motor, camera, the crowd started moving, let's keep up the penguin gait more cheerfully, pay attention to the pragoons , got ready, started, finally, let's go. and then our life is a game, the extraordinary adventures of experts in the winter series of games, since november 26, in the first city, a series of brutal murders continues, the fourth victim was discovered today on the outskirts of the city, we were left here alone, but how did people find out what was here happened, many children were taken away,

were you familiar with the victim? with each other, here in this town everyone is tied up, so they don’t shine anything here, uh, what do you want from me, we came here to catch a freak, here you go, stop messing around, savchenko, you just arrived, and there are traces of you like a tractor, i came to do business and will bring this matter to the end, well, like him, i don’t want to be with this scumbag anymore work, they throw him around the districts, complicated matters, a very conflicted comrade. you work in the police, yes, our city is small, you can’t hide anything, i need to know everything, every step he takes, understand? our territory is large, there are many cities, so look, territory, soon, at the first, turn around.

there is a big game on the air, today what it says: the ukrainian offensive failed , this is not the opinion of only russian experts, this is not the opinion only, if you like, of some more realistic but anti-hemonist- minded, american and other western experts. this has become generally accepted, i don’t know anyone now who writes in the west , speaks in influential publications on influential forums on this topic, the topic of the war in ukraine, who would not admit that

the ukrainian offensive ended in failure, moreover, that it was all a failure talk more not tactical, but strategic, not just that ukraine... lost the offensive, but that ukraine is simply not able to win this war. let's listen to what richard haas, one of the most authoritative american international experts, the former president of the council on foreign relations, and before that the head of the state department's foreign policy planning department, said just yesterday on this matter , says that ukraine does not have a complete victory and it can’t be, let’s listen. with ukraine we have the big problem is that there is simply a huge gap between goals and the real state of affairs. the idea that ukraine is going to liberate by military means all

the lands that are occupied by russia, approximately 20% of its territory. it's commendable, i support her, but it won't happen. what worries me is that many people are becoming more and more disillusioned and are coming to the conclusion that no matter how desirable this is, it is simply not feasible. therefore, i believe that the us. it is necessary to have very substantive conversations with ukraine, with president zelsky, to talk about so that they do not focus on liberating lands, they increasingly focus on retaining what they have. the idea that another or two or 3 years will lead to success is simply not imaginable to me, russia has gone on a war footing, that in any situation in foreign policy, in any situation in life, there is a big gap between what you are trying to do and your ability to do so, you will have to either increase your means or lower your goals, and i think that the only real option here as a tactical measure is - is to lower our goals. of course, richard hus is a private citizen today, and i think he says in principle what he thinks?

i also think that he is an authoritative , experienced, cautious person not only in the sense of his approach to external... to some kind of agreements, and then to world peace? no, you know, it’s too early to raise our glasses, i think that we will raise our glasses after the one that the president set for the liberation of four new

subjects of the russian federation, and it would be better, if we say so, to expand these a little tasks, i really like odessa, i really loved this city there in soviet times, well, nikolaev, of course. this too, this is a russian city, so it seems to me that there is something to work on. now, uh, speaking of some subtotals, you know, there are two constants. the first constant, which in principle none of the serious experts disputes, is that, uh, to defeat russia for ukraine , uh, it’s simple, it’s impossible due to the incomparability of human, industrial, military, whatever potentials, they are inferior to us by a multiple, so to win, so that ukraine defeats russia, some kind of miracle should happen, naturally, if , so to speak, the united west was on the side of ukraine, then

the balance of power would of course be in favor of the united west, i mean purely military participation, military intervention, with its air force, ground forces, naval forces and so on. but here the second constant comes into play, in order to defeat a nuclear power, which is russia, and a nuclear power, well, i believe that it is number one in its potential, let even number two, comparable to an american, is simply theoretically impossible, all this will end, so to speak, in a global nuclear conflict, we started very well in february of twenty-two, we, in principle, in three weeks, solved the main, so to speak, military tasks, very quickly liberated, unblocked the water supply of the crimea, that is, they occupied the kherson ... region, well, not all, as well as zaporozhye, but nevertheless,

they advanced significantly, they were near kiev, near kharkov, that is, they practically destroyed 70% of the potential of the air force disabled all bases of the non-existent fleet, practically destroyed the air defense system of ukraine, that is, the tasks were completed. ukrainians, as predicted by many of our people who were involved in planning operations, in march they requested the start of negotiations, and such negotiations took place, we all saw them, despite all the pomp of the ukrainian delegation, starting with the uniform and ending there, not very appropriate behavior of some members, but it doesn't matter, it was

ready, it was so to speak, well, during the negotiations we initialed the heads of the delegation, that is, the text was agreed upon, all that remained was to hand over these agreements for signature to senior officials, and here we, of course, from my point of view, showed excessive humanity, about the president said this, we began to make gestures of goodwill, we moved away from kiev and immediately received a riot, this huge provocation, we moved back from some positions in the kharkov direction, well, in general, i won’t go into detail for lack of time, and then, we went on the defensive, we also had some mistakes that were made in the kharkov direction, when we left the raisins, we had to leave the platform on the right bank of the dnieper, when all the bridge crossings were pontoon and in the conditions of

the approaching winter the population of kherson was supplied and it seemed difficult for our group, well, it was actually a wise decision, it was a wise decision , the most important thing is that we withdrew our group without practically any losses and we withdrew, unlike the kharkov direction, we withdrew 1000 population from kherson, who, so to speak, we actually saved from their lives, because they all supported us, some received russian citizenship, so to speak, in general, the operation was carried out, from my point of view, flawlessly, and then you understand, the famous, as they call it, counter-offensive, although it is not a counter-offensive, because we have not attacked yet, this offensive operation, it is so incompetently planned, you know, well, in spite of all the military... without, not to mention without, air superiority, without cover with

air, without an advantage in technology, in armored vehicles, without an advantage in artillery, without an advantage in systems, multiple launch rocket systems, without any powerful training, artillery and missiles, just battalion, tactical groups began to poke around in a dozen directions in in search of so-called weak points, they were set... some completely impossible tasks to reach the coast of the azov sea, so to speak, with the goal that this was a completely mediocre accomplishment, as a result they lost under 100,000 people, there are more than two pieces of equipment, tanks, well, in general, well, it was absolutely clear that this is the result, now we are in active defense, moreover, in active defense, we are advancing in some directions.

well, i hope that soon, so to speak, we will close the encirclement ring around avdeevka, and then it will be possible to go to kramatorsk, slavyansk, liberate the rest of the donetsk people's republic, but in general i hope that, well, probably the ground will freeze, our command is all -will carry out an offensive operation and choose a direction the main attack, a couple of auxiliary directions, will carry out powerful ... artillery and missile training will strike the company, it seems to me that in general it has already in many ways arrived, because from everything that i know, in general, it is fighting in the russian the country already has a different army, with different weapons behind other soldiers, and what leo tolstoy wrote about, that yes, of course, a good plan, optimal disposition, everything is very important, but the spirit, the willingness to endure, is

a very central factor, and then, what i see. today is completely different than it was in the beginning operations, a turning point, you know, when i say a turning point, that’s when a turning point comes, this is not stalingrad, this is during the second great patriotic war, this is first the battle of kursk, the battle of kursk, then the capture of kiev, then the germans just ran, the front collapsed, that’s when the front begins to crumble and the enemy begins a feverish retreat, completely unorganized, this... is called a turning point, in my understanding, in your understanding, this is probably how it should be, in my understanding, a turning point is not necessarily one moment, and this is some very important trajectory, i have the feeling

of arguing with you, argue, why not? but i just have a feeling, let's listen to what defense minister sheigu said today about the defense capabilities of the russian army. the main task this year is aimed at quickly equipping troop groups with weapons , equipment, ammunition and property. thus, the volume of supplies to the troops, compared with the beginning of last year, of basic standard artillery weapons has increased almost five times, to be precise, 4.9 times. 16 times, supply of weapons

increased by 12 times, of which high-precision long-range missiles are five times, for clarity, these are official data from the ministry of defense, but again, if you look at the western press, washington, in general, is not with this level of specificity , they all talk about the same thing, that contrary to everyone, all expectations in the west, russia practically managed to do it in a year. under conditions of very strict sanctions, fighting with a coalition of approximately 50 states, russia alone managed to spread its wings, create very large military defense capabilities and an army,

which in general, which in general is proud that it is part of russia, is fighting from russia , probably this is not... a complete strategic change, let’s say, how about the fact that this is the end of the beginning, to use churchill’s expression, that this is the chapter, which was in place throughout the autumn of 2022, it was reliably and for a long time closed, and with this i agree that a completely different stage of ours is coming. our confrontation, so to speak, with the united west, you understand, they are facing very difficult times in terms of, despite all the mantras that we will help, but objectively, they are entering, well, the americans already next year, the germans next year, are entering the next electoral

cycles, elections, there is less and less money in the budget, a trickle of supplies, so to speak, it is getting smaller, or there, it is becoming less, zelsky has already begun to utter the phrase that if there is no money, there is no help, he will have to retreat, austin comes, there is pistorius in kiev, with the sole purpose, from my point of view, of providing psychological support, to calm zelsky, because with what they come, well, well, the same one here pistorius, zelsky is asking for pvu funds. promises four aerist complexes, a good system, this is somewhere between our beech and thor, a medium-range system, but what are 125 missiles, well, these numbers are not the same, although of course, each missile is a target, but

- taking into account our rep system, taking into account - our - multiply increased capabilities for - delivering - strikes, that is , the depletion of air defense systems, they will not be able to cope with us, well, honestly, just uh, no matter how puffed up the americans are and - there is the european union, what we we'll help. well, yes, ukrainians can fight to the last, the only advice is: lower the age of seventeen, the minimum, raise it to seventy, well, can you imagine, 70 years old for a man who, so to speak, is being driven into the trenches, but i understand another seventy-year-old general who can sit on at the very top of the insert and share experience in planning operations, but sitting in a trench, especially in winter for a seventy-year-old man, is generally prohibitive, of course, i say the same thing about a seventeen-year-old boy. we're going off to advertise, we'll be back in literally

let’s talk for a few minutes in the light of all this experience, what we expect from the collective west , first of all, from washington, at the new stage of this war, we’re going to advertising, the season premiere, this is an honorary pension, cherkassov wants to talk about savin’s mother, he’s retired , but not at all, murderers, you are murderers, doctor, no, no, i’m not like that, like that, like that, we’re all like that , if more, cherkasov’s case, i know you cherkassov, you’ll find him, or you’ll die, tomorrow, after the program time , on the first, pavel andreevich koltsov, adjutant of the commanders, yuri solomin: a man, a legend, the star of our cinema, the artistic director of almost the most classic small theater in the country, don’t consider me a white artist, just an old one, one of

the old artists of the small theater, he just said that he is not a great actor, he is a great russian actor, for the last few years he has hardly appeared on television , all these years we have been waiting for him for an interview, what a miracle, we waited for an invitation to theater square, hello, we were building an agreement for about 30 minutes, but the people’s artist did not let us go 3 hours, the favorite of all women of the soviet union, and such a person, very simple , sweet, charming, our exclusive - unique footage taken a few days before the emergency hospitalization of yuri solomin, exclusive with dmitry borisov, premiere, on saturday on the first, give him a short characterization, professional...

eliminating kokh is of great political importance, but is it worth risking such a valuable agent for the sake of eliminating kokh, based on real events, a real intelligence officer must be ready for anything, to the razor's edge, the premiere of the serial film is coming soon. on the first, he is the enemy, and you fell in love with him like a cat, you get pleasure

, what will ukraine, the collective west, the united states, the main curator of ukraine, do, and what will they do now, when the ukrainian offensive has failed, that’s what... president putin speaks on this matter. in conditions when the potential for sanctioned aggression against us has been virtually exhausted, sabotage, simply natural sabotage, or acts of sabotage at the most important global infrastructure facilities can be used. we remember with you what happened to the northern stream. and in the russian government, indeed.