[000:00:00;00] the collective west, and secondly, people who were paid by the countries of the collective west, and after that talk about russian aggression, but it’s not very logical, but the problem of logic, when we talk about the united states, especially the joe biden administration, the problem of logic there is really very acute, and is in no way limited to ukraine. today is another sad anniversary, the anniversary of the assassination of john kennedy, it happened 60 years ago, that's what 's especially sad when we talk about this terrible event, that even after 60 years it's not it has been established who committed this crime. public opinion polls show that

americans themselves have. believes that the cia most likely did it, and another 13% believed that the mafia did it, a much smaller number of people point their fingers at cuba, at russia, i actually take the commission’s conclusions seriously, well, i know some of them, they told me that they were convinced that ospholt was really the only killer, but every day we hear some new facts, some new accusations, it will probably be established

more and more difficult. but what really happened, but the fact that almost half of americans think that this murder was the work of the cia and the mafia, this speaks for itself, this speaks of how americans see their own society, what they consider the american authorities to be an american criminal the world could have been capable of this... the events of days long gone, although of course, with serious, if you like, conclusions for our time. and returning to what is happening today, there was this very important meeting in new delhi, less is written about it than about the previous one, because there was no scandal, because it was not possible to organize there, the next meeting of the comradely lynching

against russia. nevertheless, it was an important meeting. senator chizhov, what do you think happened there, does it really matter? you know, i will try to propose that this summit be considered a virtual summit of the twenty, again, a small twenty, and a group of twenty, we have already agreed, a group of twenty, yes, and consider this as a link in a chain, because shortly before this in the city of sad american glory in san francisco, there was an ots summit and similar efforts were made there for ukrainianization, discussion and, again, well, in the absence of our president, but nevertheless, the use of this format to

condemn russia. it didn’t work out, which means that now it’s twenty, it didn’t work out again, that is, apparently, there is still a certain trend , and the bearer of which is, well, one might say, the global south, or one might say, the world majority, which seems to be gradually shifting the discourse, global to side of realism. towards leaders dealt with real problems and were not distracted by conflict situations in different places. of course, we must take into account that what is happening today in the middle east is very

far from any settlement of the palestinian-israeli conflict, but again, despite all the severity of this is also the result of, well, inattention or an arrogant attitude, not even in the case of the collective west, but specifically of the united states, to international formats for resolving the middle east. i remember well how we created the international quartet, as in it in fact, i remember there was a division of three against one, and this one was the united states, which in the end said, well, we’re not interested, but we’ll try it ourselves, yes, at that moment - the rest decided to give washington a chance, well, that’s what this happened, we see today, let's see what happens with this next, and listen to the opinion

from israel, yakov kedmi, former head of one of the israeli intelligence services and a frequent guest on this program, and yakov you predicted quite recently that this is exactly what transactions may take place tell us what happened and what prospects do you see? the negotiations went on for quite a long time, in the end, they came to a common denominator, because there were two main things that led to this result: israel was interested primarily in the release of the hostages, primarily women and children, about 50 people, and , hamas, since military pressure increased more and more, as always in such cases, the greater the military pressure, the more inclined it is to negotiate. i can

paraphrase this by saying when the leaders of hamas feel their death, they are ready to negotiate, the death of their fellow citizens does not interest them at all, that is, the leadership is mass, the sacrifices that the palestinian people make are of even less interest than the leadership of ukraine, the sacrifices that ukraine makes in today's war , well, this is the reality, these are our neighbors, in the end, after the entire northern, central gas was almost occupied, they finally agreed to the conditions that we considered, before that they wanted to negotiate and said we would release one or two a day and the truce will be endless. today the conditions

are limited, which were agreed today, and they say that in 4 days on 4 days, at which a truce will be declared, hamas must release. approximately 50 people, women and children, about thirty children and, uh, eight mothers and more of these children, and another 12 elderly sick women, 4 days are given for this, for this hamas will receive 150 released women and teenagers arrested for terrorism, the youngest. .. a teenager of 15 years old, some of them are convicted, some of them,

are under investigation, among those released there will be only one woman who is convicted of murder, 17 are convicted of attempted murder , the rest are of other types of crimes, which we characterize as terror, mediation of terror, after that for 6 days they can release 10 every day people, for this on this day a truce will be declared on this day and we will release another 30 prisoners, that is, in just this period of 10 days 110 hostages and... female prisoners and teenagers who are sitting in our prisons, after that everything ends, if in the process of this new opportunities arise, then the israeli government

will consider them, hamas says that it has a problem, yes, it will be able to free the women and children who are in the hands of hamas and jihad islam, they say that some of the children and women fell into the hands of local clans, this is a clan-based tribal society, they took them hostage, and basically they occupy everything, these are bandit clans, in order to later make money from them, hamas says: we don’t know where everyone is, we told them, you will find, there will be a truce, we will release , if you don’t find, the truce will end, this is the situation, regarding the hostages, i want to clarify, there are only 236 hostages, 41 of them are thai workers who were also taken hostage.

that is, only israelis in the hands of hamas and jighad are 195 people, after 10 days, probably more than 100 will still remain with them, these are military men, these are men, these are women, without children, and women military personnel, then we’ll see what happens, so far, according to the decision of the israeli government, when this ends, military action, today from the point of view of the military situation, all of the gas north of the gaza river is in the hands of the israeli army, almost all the neighborhoods have been cleared, now there are two blocks left, this zeitouna and jibaliya, jibaliya is surrounded by clearing and if there is an order to begin to enter the southern part of gaza, where israel has not yet entered. in the southern part there are two main cities,

khanyunis and rafiyah. hanyounis is the birthplace of hamas, it is the nest of hamas and the main city, which will be. probably there, if it starts, it will again be the same as with gas, cut off the coast, take khanyunis and see what happens next. this will practically solve the hamas authorities in the southern part, in the north they have yakov, thank you, help me understand, there is some kind of contradiction, in the arab world, and in the west, there are commentators, and even officials who say that if hamas releases, more people, there are more hostages than the number that has now been agreed upon, then, accordingly, this process may last and may even last for... some

significant period of time, and maybe develop into some kind of long-term truce, but israeli prime minister netanyahu said something completely different, let 's listen, now a lot of nonsense is being spread that after the pause associated with the return hostages, we will stop the war, then let me clarify, we are at war and we will continue the war, we will continue the war until we reach obscurity and ensure that there is not a single element left in gaza that threatens israel. yakov, explain what said prime minister netanyahu, this is like a political declaration, or, well, from your point of view, a specific and credible statement of israeli intentions in military

action, as long as hamas exists, no matter how long the hostage exchanges last, the government has approved a program for 10 days, during these 10 days, 4 and 6, it will develop exactly according to the parameters that i announced, which the government approved, the same, the government approved at the end of... these 10 days, if new ones are not achieved agreement, hostilities will be resumed. all the truces that will be for the exchange of the release of hostages and the receipt of arrested terrorists will be only for this purpose, they do not stop or terminate the military operation, that is, while there is an exchange, there will be no military action, when it ends, military action will continue. because the goal of this operation is the destruction

of hamas in gaza, both military and political presence, and this will continue as soon as possible, how the hostage issue will be resolved, this is the goal, in the name of this goal we launched military action, and i want to add two things: hezbollah stated that although it did not participate in the negotiations, this is a ceasefire agreement while it operates in gaza, they will adhere to it, this in itself is also positive, it will somehow reduce tensions in the north, in relation to gaza and hamas, we see, the israeli authorities see, a solution to the conflict can be found,

including within the framework of the creation of a palestinian state, the first conditions of this, so that hamas no longer exists in this territory and the possibility of hamas coming to power in a new state or in the palestinian authority is eliminated, just as happened in 2007, when this is decided, the road to a diplomatic solution to the conflict will be open. yakov, thank you so much, thank you for your time, thank you for such a serious presentation of the israeli position, i hope you will be on our air in the coming days. more. thank you, senator chishov, you heard what yakov kedmi said, and i the question immediately arises: i was in beirut in 1982, when the palestinian organization , the palestine liberation organization, was being taken out of there, the israeli position

was that there could be no peace until the palestine liberation organization was removed from lebanon, as a result... can you can you imagine something similar happening now with hamas, or are these historical analogies groundless? i think that these analogies are not entirely correct, because even if the gas sector leaves the israeli army a wet spot. then the survivors the survivors, hamas, they will probably be able to find shelter on the west bank, where the main one is located, but it will be difficult for them to penetrate the west bank, but hardly

impossible, that is, what will the israelis do then, they will also suppress fire and fire the remaining pieces interspersed with palestinian autonomy in the west bank and where then is the end? ok, the palestinians , they will move somewhere to another state, i just don’t see when you say that the analogy is incorrect, i agree with you, because in relation to the organization liberation of palestine, it was a significantly more respectable organization. hamas, i can’t imagine, well, hamas can, as they say, change its colors, such cases are known in world history, let

’s look, without going far from europe, at the dynamics of events in northern ireland at one time. when those who were considered terrorists, they then quite respectably created a faction in parliament and so on, well , this is one example, there are many such examples around the world, but i think that after listening to yakov, it would probably be interesting listen to us, the point of view of the palestinian side, you are absolutely right, and we will try. everything to do, one more opinion can be listened to and needs to be heard general lepova this is the topic that we learned this morning, only the topic that is being discussed in all the media about the truce and the release of hostages on both sides, yes this topic is needed, this topic is long-awaited, but today we see a

phenomenon when it can be called in other words, when they try to put out a fire with gasoline, when... israel tries free the hostages in the territory of the gaza sect, everyone knows very well that these hostages are hidden somewhere deep in the tunnels and there in some ruins, at the same time israel is trying to free these hostages, leveling the gaza strip with bombs, missiles, tanks, with tractors there and so on, with such a release, with such equality , the hostages have practically no chance to free the hostages. and then the conclusion will be drawn that israel does not need living hostages. today, israel has set itself a very a dubious task. task one is the destruction of hamas, task two: the release of the hostages, and in order to complete the task, israel will need to enter the territory of at least

three or four more states, in search of these leaders, in search of this hamas. this is generally impossible, israel is unlikely to fight simultaneously against three, four or more arab states, this is one side of the issue, the second is that the release of hostages, the release of hostages, they are not released like that, they are released through negotiations, they sit down at the negotiating table, find a compromise, release everything, stop all hostilities, find a compromise when they exchanged everything for everyone under different formulas and conditions, after that then the military phase begins, then israel can boldly transgress, destroy hamas, but not the civilian population , which is now being destroyed and no one takes these losses into account, and the saddest thing in this whole story is now, with the actions of israel, they are laying a time bomb under themselves

for 50 years, if the father burying the dead a child with seven, a wife there and so on, that after the end of the hostilities he will sit down at the negotiating table there or will love israel more deeply, if a son who buried his palestinian parents, buried his parents, when he grows up and is able to take up arms, he will go to be friends with israel, they are now laying... a mine for several generations of hostilities, constant shelling of the israeli population by all muslim states bordering israel, they understand this very well, they are doing it deliberately, and most importantly the main thing, about one more aspect, is that behind all these events that we have already discussed today, ukraine, israel, the middle east and so on, behind everything there is their, like a striped master who pushes and inflames, interesting question , i agree with you in principle, and not only about what

kind of mine israel is placing under itself , it’s that when you first bomb, and then, moreover, it resembles carpet bombing, it may not be intentional, but it’s, it’s war crime, then of course, after that, start releasing the hostages, somehow it’s not doing it in the right order. everything is correct, on the other hand, hostages are not released by four tank divisions, no, on the other hand, on the other hand, a leader appeared at the head of russia after the yeltsin era ended, who clearly and clearly said that the people who did what , what the terrorists did, that they will be destroyed where they are found, and will be washed in the toilet. and it seems to me that this was not only a fair statement, but

if you like, it became part of putin’s mandate, this is what helped him very quickly to turn not only into a president, but into an incompetent national leader. therefore , it seems to me that here we need to differentiate a little, how we need to behave delicately when releasing hostages, and how we need to think about the civilian population. israel clearly didn’t do anything and even boasted that they didn’t do it, so what kind of military operation to carry out where it can be carried out relatively purely against hamas is, from my point of view, a separate issue, and when russia negotiates with hamas, i want to remind these negotiations with the political leadership, and not with military commanders, the situation is very difficult, that's how it is... there is the right balance between concern for the civilian population and the need to destroy terrorists,

this is what needs to be done, what the israelis refuse to do, this is from my point of view, it is necessary to do with a scalpel and not an ax, what do you think, i think, and i want to continue your thought, we must not forget who created hamas, well , israel is capable of this, who trained, who created, who pushed this ideology, and... about how to work correctly in in this situation, israel has enormous experience, it has been working in the encirclement of the arab world for, well, more than 60 years, today, this is the best intelligence, as they used to say, the best experience is working with terrorists, that is, wars with them and plus for them hostages are taken all the time, and they have never taken hostages in such numbers, but this best experience needs to be applied now. in order to free these living hostages, and then let them bring in three, four, there are 10 divisions, i completely agree with you, but that’s correct

you said that you have now put the cart in the driver's seat, will many agree with you? israeli mothers, who, as you know, maybe not in the terms you used, but very close to it, they put pressure on netanyahu in exactly the direction you spoke about, we go to advertising, and after that anronik mihranyan will explain to us what the united states is doing in this whole situation; i was especially intrigued by the message that it plays a big role. understandable to the cir, but who did hamas represent, a rhetorical question, let's go to advertising. ukrainian historians stated that they learned to extract oil in ukraine supposedly in the 3rd century. what century, in

what chronicles? all these stories were created for only one task, the ukrainian empty industry is, generally speaking, nonsense, this does not happen, the equipment of the lancet is supposedly insufficient to damage the most important targets, writes ukrainian telegram channels, what is its great advantage, x-wing, this gives very good controllability, i will now reveal an incredible military secret, anti-fake, premiere, tomorrow on the first. rum, castra. a product of the stellar group, a big game is on air. so, professor andronik migranyan, professor gemo, you have heard many questions about the american role in this situation , the american role in the conflict in gas, around

gas, what do you think? i think that american society today is, in general, divided into two parts, there is a position of the american authorities, and even the american authorities are now somewhat trying to distance themselves from israel, in general they are also taking a stand, maybe not as sharply as many representatives of the public, some politicians, and so on, let the israeli leadership tell us, yes, they want to eradicate and destroy hamas, but to what extent? then, you see, again, it became a commonplace, hamas is an ideology,

hamas is a military organization, hamas is a social organization. and judging by the fact that netanyahu refuses to specify what they are going to do, it means that they stand on tanyahu, but i’m scared to even think about it, on the fact that if necessary, everyone can be totally destroy, because in general, no other thoughts arise when you listen to what we have to, well, okay, they will return these, it is very important here, by the way, the americans are calling, even the american authorities are calling, and the public is calling, tell me, how are you going to do this, well, in general, as i understand it, the israeli leadership refuses to give such an answer to

this question, the second point, i think that... yes, indeed, the cia participated, and qatar, naturally, was involved in this, because after all, the main sponsors are qatar, wow, but the fact is that it seems to me that, anyway, we already know what they agreed to; the cia, of course, represented israel, it seems to me. that is, israel at the trilateral negotiations were again represented by israel and the united states? yes, yes, so it seems to me that , to be honest, i’m not so optimistic, yes, here kedney said that kedmi said that in

some positive direction, there are shifts there. so on, here is some part of hezbollah behaving decently, judging by him and hezbollah, in general, well, jacob of justice on the radio he predicted that after this the israelis would go to the big one. but yes, because netanyahu said so, and because netanyahu does not want to take on any obligations, and this means, and this is a dead-end line, and it seems to me that this line cannot lead to anything good for israel in the first place, yes of course, many people will die, because when multi-storey buildings, in general, fall apart , thousands of people remain under them, of course, these pictures are broadcast all over the world today, this cannot,

of course, not create a sharply negative public opinion regarding, that is, israel, the behavior of the israeli leadership, moreover, i think that for the first time, probably, this has never happened, i think i’ll say this thing now, i’m a person who also belongs to a people who went through genocide and also, the armenian people, yes, and also, it would seem, of course, if you were greatly offended, you suffered greatly, then no matter what you did, you would be forgiven for it, but the current situation shocked me, nothing for anyone doesn't want to think about the whole world anymore

the holocaust, about the losses of the jewish people, because these pictures are already eclipsing everything that happened, it’s very sad, it seems to me that this is the biggest loss of the israeli leadership, not the jewish people, the israeli leadership is losing very big here, well, i i don’t believe in collective responsibility , so when... they try to tell the russians that you are responsible for absolutely everything, the ukrainians said that russians are not people, and especially when people who recently left russia say this, it makes me feel i’ll say frankly, not just rejection, but disgust, but on the other hand, anronik , i think both armenians and jews need to admit that the tragedy that befell these two peoples, that it cannot be an indulgence, that’s what i tell people

, which very often, in most cases, did not relate to the holocaust, not to the tragedy of the armenians during the first world war , which, in general, the modern armenian government had nothing to do with this tragic past and nothing to do with it, but to you, general, i just want. v development of your own thought, not mine, there were israeli hostages, in inteb, there were, there were, yes, there was an israeli operation, which was developed by a different israeli government, completely, with different people, different parties, different sentiments, and this operation was headed by a man , whose name was netanyahu, brother, the operation was designed in such a way as not only to save the lives of the hostages as much as possible, but also to avoid losses as much as possible

among anyone other than terrorists, so that it was possible in such situations, in israel to have a different mentality, i want to continue your thought, briefly, this operation that you just said, it was analogous to the history of the fight against terrorism and analogous to the history of intelligence and how to work in this particular situation, when these hostages were captured and how to selectively destroy everything around the world who participated in this capture, let's say so, and in fact the operation was carried out brilliantly, only because everyone who participated was all destroyed, and these long decades were an example for other intelligence agencies, for others special forces on how to work specifically to free hostages. which cannot be said in today's situation, i completely agree, in the united states it is very difficult , from my point of view, to have a rational discussion about

what is happening between israel and hamas, there are indeed mass demonstrations of opponents of this war, opponents of what israel is doing, and these demonstrations are quite broad, although frankly speaking, there are especially... two groups in them: youth, students, and of course, people of the muslim origin, many of these people do not vote yet. many are not citizens, the demonstrations look very impressive, but at the political level, this is not yet a very big force, but if you look at what plays a real role in american politics, you need to look at the rally, the huge rally that took place at days in washington in

support, both the leader of the democratic majority in the senate, senator schumer, and the new speaker, the republican speaker of the house of representatives michael johnson, they spoke with one voice, with one voice, about unconditional support for israel, well, to the screams of the crowd that supported them. we are all here together, democrats, republicans, house senate, to say: we are with israel, we are with israel,

we, we, we, usa, usa, usa, with israel, it will not happen again, it will not happen again, it will not happen will happen again, it will not happen again, mile johnson, who stood right there next to the sumerian, he said about the same thing, only in short, this is senator schumer, who is one of the main, one of the main critics of russia in the united states. who accuses russia of war crimes in ukraine, here he demonstrates such absolutely blind support for israel, andronik, this does not surprise me, dmitry, i know him well, i have seen him many times in new york, he is one of the prominent representatives of the jewish community in new york, and in fact speaking, and of course i understand

why he... all the programs about biden. biden's rating is falling and falling precisely in those groups that supported the democrats, these are young people, these are the all-voting youth who are protesting in the streets today at universities against the war and against biden, which means there is even a serious decline, which means among blacks,

among latinos. and it seems to me that today, again, this, this support, it is clear to me, because i, well, let’s be honest, the jewish lobby has a huge influence on american politics, and of course, many politicians in the usa, they go and ask i choose money for mine. who can give them this money , so i think that on the one hand, this is the establishment that is making deals, this is one thing, and another thing is that today, what we are seeing, lately we have been constantly observing that a society that brings some deputies

to its house of representatives. and so on, demands that they correspond to their moods, yes, and by the way, this will be a serious blow to these people, who, and when again, i already spoke about this once, when macarthy, behind the scenes, agreed with the democrats and made a decision, the speaker of the house, he was immediately re-elected, and this could happen with mike johnson. and this, with the shomer, well, what's the shomer, senator from new york, new york, in general, the most powerful jewish influence. lobby and, in general, huge millions of people live there, who do not represent all of america, do not represent america, so it seems to me that yes, you can hold rallies, but what is happening

in the depths of society is alarming, and this is what i think very worried, because, by the way, many who love israel very much, who have great respect for the jewish community and jews, they are very worried, because they are afraid for the future state of israel, because this is the line that took today’s the israeli leadership seems to them that this is a very dangerous line and leads nowhere. andronik, thank you, we’re leaving for advertising, we’ll be back in just a few minutes. season premiere, there were two killers, one of them is still at large, and the case cannot be closed, you killed my son, i now have another doll, just as obedient as you, and what are we looking for,

we are looking for the second killer, mosgaz cherkasov's last case, final episode, who came? tomorrow after the program it's first time. in a sense, my films are a battle with myself. sometimes i start yell at myself, and sometimes i talk to god. it's not always the same. stone became famous at the age of 40, later than other star directors of his generation. in my opinion, cinema is, first of all , a direct, immediate experience, it is a kind of autobiography. it's always about you, even when you try to get rid of yourself in order to convey the experience of others, and isn't it strange that a person with a biography that provides plots for films ends up becoming a film director? there must be some kind of

law of attraction that unites all my movies. in my opinion, they are all about heroes, a hero who strives to find his soul. matador. oliver stone on friday on the first. when you address yourself, i hope you are addressing all of humanity. there's a big game on the air. general, you wanted to continue the topic of israel's middle east. the statement of two prominent american leaders, the speaker of the house and the democratic representative once again clearly confirmed the policy of double standards. which is carrying out today, everything that happens in gaza is israel’s self-defense, israel has the right to defense, that’s all, what is happening on the territory of ukraine is a war crime, russia is an aggressor country, and this is certainly subject to both

global discussion and discussion on all platforms in europe around the world, this once again suggests that america, america looks at everything through those. glasses, which are beneficial to look at the world that is now being done, and what is happening now in america , america itself, american society itself is trying not to notice those shameful phenomena, even the situation in san francisco, when the chinese leader came there, how are they this city they tried to bring it up, to give it a civilized appearance, that it is not customary to talk about those problems that are on the streets of american cities today, it is not customary to discuss them, and in general it is all hushed up. americans talk about this every day, on many channels they talk about it from morning to evening. but today we will return to the results that our president spoke,

and today we heard clearly sobering, truthful assessments of the situation developing in the middle east, the situation that is happening in ukraine. and today we hear more and more often. and we see that many leaders of the g20 are actually telling the truth, they are no longer following the course that america has outlined , today they are increasingly supporting russia, russia is no longer alone in carrying out special operations, their former ones are increasingly turning away from ukraine , its former allies, friends, as it seemed to the ukrainians, or rather the ukrainian, kiev regime, and all this also suggests that the european model - the un, the european union - needs to be seriously revised, because if we take the situation in the middle east, then. ..

these european institutions do not enjoy the authority of israel, all the calls of antony gutierres, all the calls of the european union, all leaders, and so on, to stop hostilities, to allow a humanitarian corridor, to allow the removal of all the wounded, to provide all the necessary medicines and food to the gaza strip, practically israel completely ignores, when there was such a decision, the decision of the un, the decision of the calls of the leaders of the european union. to any other country, european, civilized, and so on, so that they all were ignored, this once again speaks of the virtual lack of authority of these european organizations, this suggests that it is necessary to reconsider the entire model of the structure of europe, but i think that they themselves will draw conclusions, conclusions, today there are more and more world leaders, more and more world, or rather as leading states, confirm that russia is right. we are performing operations on her and now the situation in ukraine as a whole suggests

that the kiev regime and the bans don’t even believe in their victory; they don’t even believe in victory in ukraine europe, voices are already heard from the ocean, saying that we have miscalculated a little, this is your strong point, senator, the european union, you know it well, you have been there for a long time, i have the impression that, in fact, it listens to no one except the united states, and then, the united states is listening reluctantly, but now the question of the european union, and the european union is again saying that they are going to continue to provide assistance to ukraine, although they seem to be saying that on a smaller scale, your assessment, well, i’ll tell you this, if we move from the middle east to

ukraine, then quite recently, our positions on the middle east, the positions of the european union on the middle east were practically the same, and i even said then that we with the european union, as a healthy majority, together with the unovites, a healthy majority in the quartet, should strive for the involvement of the united states in participation, that the americans did it, i already said. this means that as far as ukraine is concerned, the issue has two dimensions, one is purely financial; the european union has practically no money left for ukraine. so, what sources could they have? their budget has been approved, it contains such the amounts they advertised are not there.

the so-called european peace fund, european peace facility, is a mechanism created several years ago, as they assured me, that it was created in general for the sake of helping the sahel countries, and not ukraine, but they drained all the money from it a long time ago, and further political declarations that it would be necessary to add money to this fund even before adding money, they had no practical result, so everything they promise, they will turn to the member countries, and so that they on bilateral channels or through this fund, additional money was allocated, this is one side, the second side, so to speak, is applied, but they promised a million artillery shells, by the end of the year, it will not be there, all that they were able to produce and will be able to produce 370,000 by the end of the year is far from a million. moreover,

attempts to delay this obligation, the fulfillment of this obligation until march, are also unrealistic, and not by march, by the end of march this will not happen. that is, i’m not even talking about the fact that the arsenals of the european union countries themselves practically empty. yes, all the equipment. soviet and russian production, which they had, they had not so little , mainly, of course, in central-eastern europe, this is all a long time ago, in ukraine a lot has already been destroyed, but the expectation is that the americans will drop everything and restore them this, this of course corresponds to the long-term plans of the american military-industrial complex, but this also requires time and capital investments in the united states. where the budget situation is also well known, so

there are a lot of words, but there will gradually be less to do, the more moreover, that... the number of countries in the union that are, in principle , against providing military support to ukraine is beginning to increase. following hungary, slovakia comes out from these positions, let's see who's next. until recently, criticizing ukraine in the european union was generally considered unusual and even indecent, yeah, and one of the main supporters of ukraine. was the president of the czech republic, general peter pavel, a general, was the chief of staff, i know him well, especially, so this is what the respected general said just a few days ago, the ukrainian counter-offensive is not going as the ukrainians themselves expected, supplies of weapons needed by ukraine are delayed , ukrainian soldiers feel not only tired, they are increasingly disillusioned with

the support of the west and feel that we are abandoning them, this will lead to what will happen increase pressure to end the conflict... with some kind of agreement; an agreement, if reached, will, of course, be based on the real situation on the battlefield. i don't have to tell you senator, that the real situation on the battlefield is an expression that has so far been used by russian diplomacy, but in kiev they categorically say that they have sacred and inalienable rights - to kiev, donbass and so on, and what can we even say? that at least some of this will remain with russia, but this is simply a crime before the conscience, that’s what pavel said, this has some specific operational consequences, i think that this is to a greater, much greater extent, a reflection of the real situation, than the so-called notorious

zelsky peace plan, which some colleagues continue to cling to. eurovet, thank you, and the last thing i would like to say is about american domestic politics , yes, it is really complex, for a long time there really is a big role for the jewish community, some call it a less tactful jewish lobby, all this is true, and this is constant explain. to russian representatives, when in russia they say that american behavior is illogical, two-faced, and so on, i will not answer this in my own words, and in the words of a man whom you andronik knew well, jamesinder, who was for many years the chairman of the executive

council, the center of national interests, which i headed, and who brought american delegations to moscow several times, and during one of these meetings, a couple of american participants, when the russians made critical remarks about american policy, tried to make some claims against america, sat there, endured it, then waved it off and said: just a second. why are you telling them all this? do you really think that russia should submit to the american political process? what you said may be an explanation, but it is not a prescription for russia. and this was a very accurate statement from my point of view, and for many

years in washington it seemed that they did not explain their prospects. and its internal political problems, that russia must accept this, well, maybe not even line up peacefully, but in general show its submission, but this is what the boss says, all i can say about this , those days are over, i i can not imagine that they return, in the interests of not only international security, but america itself, to say, these are the new realities,

this is how russia looks at it. hello, this is the psyche podcast, and we continue to sort through the storehouses of our consciousness, calculate the algorithms of our behavior, look for some kind of formula for happiness, i hope that we will... succeed in this, today i have a psychologist and psychotherapist in my studio, here in the expert’s chair, psychotherapist, ekaterina makarova, she is also a supervisor, today we will talk about what it is, ekaterina, a famous psychoanalyst, vice-president of the all-russian professional psychotherapeutic league, a person who has conducted, well, almost 2,000 consultations , and in different languages, hello, ekaterina, hello, here we have a heroine in the chair: today a psychologist is probably for people who are not completely immersed in the circumstances of this wonderful profession

, it may sound surprising, but why does a psychologist need his own kind of psychotherapy, and what he cannot cope with himself, it turns out not, alla, hello, hello, what are you waiting for us led? i believe that, well, every psychologist in general needs therapy. on an ongoing basis in order to maintain yourself in a resourceful state, and if when working with people you come across some other questions of your own, at the same time, you hear something similar, then you can come to your therapist with this question and sort it out and thereby get some additional additional resource in order to work with people, plus, uh, having solved your problem, you can give other people the opportunity to solve their problems, you... now some problem has arisen, you have some kind of request, yes, i have a request , i just recently had a very ugly story with my parents, when

we had to separate completely, at the moment we do not communicate, although for a very long time i i was working just to make these relationships more harmonious, but now i saw that if the work happens on one side, it is not the most productive work. and at that moment i had to break off our relationship, and it seemed to me that i had coped with it, but from time to time i return to this issue and i felt that i was needed after all, and you coped with what , with the interruption of relationships or with the fact that precisely with the moment of separation, when the relationship is interrupted, it’s still some kind of loss, with this loss i couldn’t cope, i’m haunted by such a feeling of guilt, and somewhere there is regret, somewhere... pain and so you go to bed at night, you think, well, everything seems to be fine, but something is wrong, but tell me, am i right? i understand that a psychologist cannot

practice in such a state, i am inclined not to practice in such a state state, because when you are not in a resourceful state or you yourself are in some pain point, in any case it will be difficult for you to maintain this zero position in which you have to work with the client, did you