among the men, alexei mishin’s ward, matvey vitlugin, took the lead. among the couples in first place are alexandra baykova and dmitry kozlovsky, in reton alexandra stepanova and ivan bukin. today the skaters will present a free program, and the main intrigue will be decided, who will end up in the final, channel one will show everything. don't miss the hot ice on our air at 16:20, also broadcast on our website. that's all, see you later. well, let's get back to our conversation, and we have another episode of a literary podcast, it 's called, let them not talk, let them read, and i, dmitry bak, its host, today am talking with a wonderful guest, he is a translator, writer, biographer and editor-in-chief of the foreign magazine.

it seems to me that in the seventies and eighties now the attitude towards translated literature is very different , because now, theoretically , anything can be translated, and translations are kept up immediately, and by anyone, yes, yes, i agree, by the way, the amendment is very important , because in the nineties, which we talked about, a revolution took place in translation, they began to attract young translators, because it was important, yes, it was important, to publish the book, to set it as soon as possible, it doesn’t have to be translated well, but it has to be translated quickly, it has to be done quickly, it’s not always possible to tell from the translation, which is not always the case, but before my eyes the book was torn to pieces 10 parts, a huge book by angelica, and was distributed to ten translators, young ones who did not really know how to translate. i didn’t look

at it because there was no time left for an editor, and then there was a sad revolution in the editorial business, because today, in the sense of foreign literature, i’ll do a compliment to his magazine, perhaps only in a foreign literature magazine, the editor knows the language from which he is editing the translation. i meant something a little different, because, of course , what you’re talking about, but i meant precisely the lack of fish in russian literature, in russian, well, as if there was a lot in samizdatekhizdat, that’s why the magazine of foreign literature was so important and interesting to everyone, it was, it was mainline, yes, almost native, let’s not offend anyone, in the new world, in october and in

neva, they published interesting things from time to time, there was a boom around the violist danilov, for example, orlov and so on, but still this was opposed by faulkner, i remember, the seventy-third year, shumy yares in the translation of the magpie, and in general roman ana here the black, black prince stinks, and we can go on and on, and these were books whose translations were usually late, relatively speaking, yes. there was no window to europe, now it means it has broken through, now it has appeared, so my idea is so simple that in these very seventies and eighties years, but we were closer, perhaps, to foreign literature, it was almost our own, i can maybe argue with you about the advisability, for example, of publishing the ulysses novels in a magazine, because this was already done then all, all of eighty-nine, one episode at a time, luckily there are exactly 12 episodes.

and then at the end there are also comments from egengeeva, who was a jewish specialist, about cultural activities, a translator , a director, she was not a translator, by the way , you know, this is now somehow attributed to her , she did a lot of things, as a translator she didn’t, yes, yes, she didn’t translate a single line, however, she and i put a joint translation of joyce’s letters in the magazine on literary issues in 1984, like this. how it appeared is unknown, here you cut me off, it’s really strange, but it’s a fact that ekaterina yuryevna, our beloved katya, didn’t translate, literally, but she did a lot, but look, it was worth printing the novel all year, when it was already possible publish it as a book, well, firstly, firstly , there wasn’t a book yet then why wasn’t there one? to do, well, it’s not clear to you, yes, well, yes , but it was not there, and this, of course, very attracted the reader to the magazine, well... here is a small

interlude, as always, and we are transported to a completely different area, this is an old book cycle , in front of me is not even a book, a brochure, but a thin booklet that was published... in 1952, it is called, as vasily turkin wrote, a response from a reader, alexander etvardovsky published this little book, a brochure, years after the end of the war, and here, in my opinion , the maximum information is presented that is necessary for the perception of this great book about a fighter, because here, for example, tvordov’s answer... not in the sense of an angry answer, on the contrary, an answer that cannot be given to every reader, and the secret was very simple, this poem, as we remember, was written four hundred kharey, so folkloric, pere, right, pere, right, bank, left, right bank, tvardovsky was simply inundated

with letters from readers who corrected him, this poem had such a clear effect of authenticity, and not fiction, just not fiction, what they wrote to tvordovsky about the fact that delen's name is not vasily, but victor, he serves in the neighboring regiment, or something else, and the most important thing is that many readers try to continue, yes, where is your terkin, where is vasily, you will find effortlessness, and so on, there is a car struggled in the snow, that is, this is a kind of hypertext, essentially, but over time, speaking. somehow it turned out that alexander trifonovich svardovsky, being one of a whole group or brigade, one might say writers, who were aimed at creating such an inspiring, propaganda

work, he was left alone and created a truly great book, in which there is not a word of propaganda, not a word of appeal to some abstract values, but there is... this is a real russian native man who sees a plane and tries to shoot it down from a rifle, sees a watch that has stopped, he corrects it, remembering his past, says that why do i need an order , i agree to a medal, an amazing accurate hit with sympathy for those who are at the front, devoid of ideology, devoid of well-established schemes , works... which truly, it overcame its boundaries and was published day after day, week after week, which is why this thin book serves as a wonderful addition to the poem by alexander tvordovsky, well, as

always, i tell you, our respected interlocutors, that a paper book is very important, very a specific book is important, a book as a thing that speaks to us, even at the moment when we... are not reading it, of course, this text can be found on the internet, you can find it in collected works, such a red color, it is - collected works, as you and i, of course, remember, but it is very important to remember and know that there is such a blue book that fell on the table of all the readers who loved the war poem of alexander tverdovsky, it is very important to remember about it and refer again and again to the text of this book, the best way to get to these places is by plane, because there are no trains here from the mainland, i’m on sakhalin island, friends, how many kilograms are in the cage now, now it’s 15, if it’s a good big female, that

a liter of caviar already, the men came with great pleasure, ate buckwheat rather than caviar, i can’t eat this caviar anymore , i got enough of this caviar, there is such an interesting mineral pyrite, they also call it fool’s gold, so let’s go look for fool’s gold, how dangerous is this entertainment, in -first, i’m wearing a helmet, you’re wearing a helmet, safety precautions , in any case, it’s never been worse, taraz is shooting at a year old, the life of its own, the premiere, today is on the first day, cognac mon, where is your work book? i don’t have it, is it a scam? yes, we are leaving moscow, i mean, what happened, mom, well

i don’t really have the time to teach her , hello, hello, what happened , the girl is conscious, the woman has an open fracture, one, two, three, did you buy your diploma or something? what were you asked to bring? is it possible to damage the spinal cord in an accident? the indicators are normal, it is not within our competence to make such conclusions. what are you doing, save your life, quietly, quietly, quietly, quietly, quietly, quietly, at least you lift your people one by one, and not all of them en masse, this is not mine, your sister says, hello, ask the nurse, tomorrow at first. mom, you

what are you doing here? i am there, this is a conditional betrayal, one couple a week, which is dedicated to the state. you teach at the university, but still, for our contemporary, what are the biographies and destinies of these people, well , perhaps, perhaps, only agatha christie has such a reputation, how right it is to formulate, well, as it were, well-known to a large circle, well, also somer svetmoy, probably, maybe somer svetmoy, and also probably oscar wilde, well, still, to a lesser extent, yes, well, a number of such virginia.

christy, ready artili fitzgerald, as you said, he is from the irish, yes, yes, i beg your pardon, henry miller, graham greene, well, i don’t know, wodehouse, yes, yes, yes, what prompted you to do this, we have already heard, it’s kind of an accident, well, yes, in a sense it’s an accident, you translated these people, i translated them, any of them, i translated almost all of them, that is, this... desire to find out more about whose text you are translating? perhaps not, you know, it’s true, what you just said is the first thing that comes to mind, but among them, among these writers, not necessarily my favorite authors, it’s, you know, i’m a very gambling person, and me, from this place in more detail, that is, what is this, this is some kind of attempt, a kind of, a kind of attempt, to figure it out, to delve into the life

of a little-known, bright, fascinating, to find in this, in this life, something, something unexpected for myself and for others, and somehow it’s neat, in bright russian to try to write about this life, but to say that i choose the authors whom i translated, so i’m interested in them , to write about them, because i translated them, i can’t say that, yeah, it’s very interesting, well, that’s a tricky one. the question may not be a tricky one, you can decide for yourself, but still , tons have been written about many of them, in english, tons of letters have been written about many of them in english, but not in russian, well, yes, but not in russian, but in russian, in principle, very little has been written about them, for example, look , somer setmoem, for example, is a terribly famous author, a favorite author, he has a huge audience, ranging from a discerning printer, so she is considered one of

the most my successful ones precisely because no one knew how his life worked and how he lived, who he communicated with and what were the features of his life, it was all very interesting, this is one side, i found the second side in myself, i’ll tell you how. ..you know, here you are a translator who sits and translates all his life, apparently he has, i’m already delving into a complex here, some kind of friedism, yes, it appears in my words, some kind of complex really appears that i translate everything and i translate everything foreign and alien, i write my own, but 100% mine.

this is a kind of compromise between the desire to write my own and a literary translation, because i’m still like an old man , i don’t just walk, but i hold on to the wall, i hold on to a stick, you know, because biography gives me a plot, especially since it’s the biography of those , whom you still know one way or another, yes, so in a sense this is like this, if i express myself clearly, this is like this. a kind of compromise between a literary translator who cannot take a blank sheet of paper and correct it as it seems possible to him too...

that is, you spy, follow the rules, like makar devushkin, romanaevsky’s hero, poor people, he likes pushkin, but i don’t like gogol, who seems to be spying on me, exactly, exactly, exactly, exactly, exactly this, this is all the thing is that i’m not ready, apparently, to write something entirely of my own, well, i ’m writing some columns for the editor-in-chief of the magazine, i do it, i must say, with great pleasure, i started writing such columns. just recently, they just told me that our new website is very good, yes, everyone says, editors-in-chief write columns for the websites of thick magazines, why don’t you write? and so i squeaked, squeaked, and in general began to write, i don’t know how it turns out, but it gives me great pleasure, that is, i have, that is it turns out, that is, i have this vein, i want to write, but i can’t write

, so to speak, a novel, but they haven’t come up with a novel yet, well, who knows, maybe everything is ahead, but i would like to return. not everything at all, well, no, in this area, no, well, let’s not talk about others, look, another tricky question, let me allow myself, you said that you don’t love everyone, you want to figure it out, but there are those you love , from these authors, yes, from these authors there are, authors whom i definitely absolutely love, and who i more or less indifferent, for example, indifferent... but you will be amazed by agatha christie, i relate to her, and i relate to her completely, completely, so to speak, calmly, i wrote her biography too, also out of some excitement, for which they say they love you, that’s why, it’s a good, good setup, i can’t read detective stories at all, i admit it in spirit too, so did i, and when i took it apart from crime, punishment, yes, i told

the editor in the editorial office of elena shubina, i have a great idea for you, a book, that's already if there was a third book, what would it be? i say, this is a woman, agatha christie, because i understand that this is a commercial project, but when you take up the pen, everyone wants to know what she is, what she is, especially since there is some secret, she i hid from the world for 2 weeks and so on and so forth, well, in general, returning to who i love, who i don’t love, i really love virginia woolf’s performance, here you just touched my heart, i definitely love graham greena, this is wonderful, my favorite writer, yes, you know, probably everything, so about, about i love, i have a more reserved attitude towards graham greene , i love virginia woolf dearly, i once fell in love with her photograph, as you remember, how swann upresta fell in love with de cressy, for the photograph where she

looks like sep fora, his daughter fora from the fresco, yes, yes, but unlike adetta. virginia wools was not a lady of the demimonde, well, yes, not at all , even, not at all, and even, and even quite the opposite, even quite the opposite, all this connected with bloomsbury, it’s so, i don’t even know what word to choose, romantic, mysterious, sublime, tragic, tragic, it would just be necessary to start with this word, yes, she was absolutely not a person of this world, if not for her, if she did not have such a husband, such a husband-friend through hyphen, she would have committed suicide much earlier, but look, what’s also very important, again i’m addressing not only alexander yakovlevich levvergant, but to our interlocutors, because we

are talking to the literature together, it’s important not only that foreign literature at some point, well in a sense, replaced russian, since russian was greatly impoverished due to the fact that something was published abroad, something was written on the table, but something was not allowed, something was not allowed in print, but from foreign in many ways, the same thing happened, because the pantheon of foreign literature that was built before the war, or the first post-war years, was far from adequate, yes, that is, there was no joyce, there was no virginia woolf, there was no david herbert. died 2 months before she committed suicide, they both knew how at the beginning there were none in russian , with the exception of these fragments in the journal international literature, there was no lawrence, and ima... and there was no virginia woolf at all, and there was no virginia woolf at all, but there were completely different authors, let’s not offend them, they are wonderful, in england, in america, in germany, dazhiny wulf

didn’t like these authors, she, she all hers, this is his famous essay, the russian point of view, she was guided by our beloved russian literature, she hated the late victorians, bennett, galsworth, her pathos of the past, read her. by the way, she even studied a little russian, in her circle there was an emigrant from russia who edited translations of david herbert lawrens, studied

with virginia woolf and her husband a little russian, she was not very successful, but she knew russian literature very well in english, in brackets of imperfect translations at that time, but through these imperfect translations she assessed the level of tolstoy. this is important because russian literature, of course, is for many people outstanding authors was a reference point, but i was votgerens, the same lorrens, david herbert, of course, well, an unexpected parallel to ari smerdok, who understood russian, which i corresponded with her, i wrote to her in russian, she answered me in english , yes, that’s why i also sinned, with the translation of the book, i have a translation of such a platonic treatise , it’s called of good over other conceptions, that is, the predominance of good over other

concepts, well, here are her existentialist books, asartri and there is also one book, crazy completely inhuman prolific, yes, how many of these novels did she bake, they all seem to be quite good, even somehow yes, well, there are some that are especially brilliant. but, from a wizard, for example, this is the second, in my opinion, novel, one of the first, we are introducing you to the work of airi stinks, dears, yes, the first novel is all that, here it is, by the way, i have never translated it, but about her and didn’t write, by the way, this is her first thing, the first thing, the second is not flight from the enchanter, some other one, in my opinion, a severed head, but i’m not sure, i’m pronouncing it wrong, but i read it all, thus. foreign literature and the translator of foreign literature dealt with a very special subject of a special kind of, but there was a special subject in front of him, which

on the one hand was equal in size to native literature, the steppe wolf, my god, or the black prince, the same, iris mandok, not to mention not to mention thomas man, who, thank god was in the canon, he thank god, yes, yes, yes, there was a collected work, huge articles were written about him, joseph was not there, it was translated by solomon konstantinovich apt heroic i've been translating these two for 20 years huge volumes, and some say that they are written better than in german , i don’t know how to evaluate this, well, the other side of the matter is that our image of foreign literature has moved greatly over the course of a century from one place to continuing your thought, i would also say that maybe this is why foreign literature, even to this day

, means more for russia than this foreign literature for the country itself, that is, here the russian territory of russian culture is the field where foreign manifests itself differently yes, this is a very important story, that’s why. the position of a literary translator, which you have occupied for many years, changing here and there, yes, but at first, at first i didn’t change, by the way, then i started translating for the foreign literature magazine, which you have been heading for, well, 15 years, from the eighth year, i it seems like a year, yes, 15 years, since the eighth year , i spoke with you with great pleasure, today it’s a pleasure, it’s mutual, thank you very much, this was today’s episode of the literary podcast, don’t let them say, let them read, we spoke today with alexander yakovlevich levvergant,

famous. from english and the editor-in-chief of the magazine foreign literature, and i, dmitry bak, at the end of our program, as always, with pathos and energy, i tell you all, read with pleasure. this is an easy money podcast, me and its host mikhail khanov. today we are dealing with such a complex topic as digital assets, digital currencies, digital ruble, cryptocurrencies and even bitcoin. our guest today is mikhail bilyaev, candidate of economic sciences, financial analyst. hello, mikhail. hello. let's help our audience figure out what digital money is, if we take the broadest class, it's digital money, digital currency, what

should we call it? here, call it what you want. sphere, that is, the sphere that is served by all kinds of electronics and other programs, so they exist only in non-cash form, in fact, how do they differ from non-cash money in all, and you know, only in technology and equipment, but there is one thing there is a very big difference that this whole class is what is usually called crypto money or cryptocurrency, it is generally divided into two such classes, which have nothing in common with each other except technology, there is the so-called cbdc, that is, from the english abbreviation , central bank digital currency, that is, the digital currency of central banks, is one thing, this is the money that the central bank issues.

they are practically no different from the national money that people are used to, be it cash or non-cash money, but we are talking about the non-cash sphere, in which the central bank begins to use new technologies, and these are not economic technologies, but technologies that relate purely to the information sphere, and here are the second classic ones, which are usually talked about, which mean, this is the money, it is also launched with a certain, well, one might say, with the same information technologies, but some separate group of people or one person who issues this money, not a central bank, not a central bank, here is a radical, this border is a watershed, but crypto is that, well, everything that relates to such a virtual sphere, and crypto, well, this is protection, secret writing, that’s all this, but there is actually

no secret writing there. cryptocurrency, well, let’s call it classical, yes, it’s more or less clear what it is, everything is built purely on trust, so to put it even more broadly, there is something created there so that you can use this money, a source of it is created there, who can get it with the help of certain algorithms are being created. such a settlement platform with which we can exchange this money , we put it aside and return to the currency, which is a topic that concerns us all, the digital ruble, let's specifically talk about the central bank of the russian federation, which has now puzzled us with the fact that some tests are already underway, yes, on the basis of individual banks, that is, there is a certain platform developed by the central bank, under the protection of the central bank, on which they will apply

or with the help of which they will apply. digital rubles, attention, question: why? it’s very bad for the central bank that it doesn’t give these explanations , i, as an economist, i, as an economist, don’t see the difference between these digital rubles that will be issued, and those rubles that circulate in non-cash form, they differ only in technology their appeals, here is a special platform that is designed to... information, precisely information, which allows all these operations to be carried out, therefore, no third form to speak, in my opinion, does not come, that is, it turns out that the central bank , in your words, simply gains additional control, observing how all the money moves not even within the framework of commercial banks, for which it is also a regulator, but simply

on a specific platform that was developed by the interbank, receives an additional contract, it seems, and they use, well , modern technologies, well, just like in their time, remember, there was, at first, cash, yes, from cash... it turned into into check circulation, check circulation turned into plastic cards, on certain also, i must say, cashless platform, and then nearfield communications, nfc appeared, which are hidden in your very smartphone, and this is not separate money, this is the same money , only their circulation is served by different information algorithms , that is, there is no semantic load of benefit for both the banking structure and ordinary users, for you and me, our audience, the digital ruble does not bring, i think, yes, the only benefit is technologies for servicing this non-cash turnover, why is non-cash money bad?

no, and these will be non-cash, only they will be serviced by a more progressive program , let’s say, so this program will be centralized under the central bank, not sub-commercial banks, which each have their own automatic banking system, but under a single platform, of course, this then banks should oppose this with both hands. why, no, why, there is no profit here, we are only talking about the movement of money, the same money that will move along the same lines as why commercial banks are needed, and even with such a level of state control, in fact, at every consumable, commercial banks are needed in order to carry out specific operations and we are returning there, there when we understand that we have a two-level banking system, we have a central bank, it regulates banks as... agents, these are the financial agents of the market, but specific operations on lending, settlements, deposits, and others, the platform itself will not be able to do this, in what, why do not load with these functions, a platform that will

perform the functions of such a single large bank, that is, in my opinion, the central bank of the bank generally descends there to the level of commercial banks and becomes a full-fledged player, no? no, the central bank is creating this platform, well, just like that, and why. never protest against fast payment platforms, yes, this is the same thing, only electronic , this is a tool, this is a means, okay, this is a question, just for understanding, and one of the theses of the cdc was that even if there is no communication infrastructure, that is, there is no access to the internet , electronic wallets of citizens, yes, that is, what is it like everyone is already familiar with, probably a flash drive, something else, you can use these. money where there is no internet, physically, this is how it happens, that is, i go up to a gas station, which is located in the steppe, let’s say there is infrastructure there, it’s like a cash register equipped with access, so that is, i put a flash drive there, that is, this flash drive, my

wallet is located, any medium, yes any carrier, card, flash drive, because the card is the same flash drive itself, but some kind of carrier of this information, and i don’t need a connection with the external world of the internet, it’s just that specifically from my wallet there is electronic money, money is written down, because then we have a plastic card let's explain, let's explain, also to our listeners who don't understand, maybe don't see, don't see the difference between a plastic card and a wallet, the fact is that when we pay with a plastic card, then the account from which from one account to another, when we we transfer, they are in different banks, by inserting this card, we transfer money from one bank, they even call it a special card account. a wallet is exactly that account recorded on this medium and it is located on the platform developed by the central bank. absolutely true, but it’s not necessarily crypto, it’s not necessarily crypto , these same wallets already exist, the fact is that crypto doesn’t

solve anything, it solves, that’s where its crypto ruble, digital ruble, it solves the question: rather, that there is finance and money corporations, individuals, report, budget. this and other things, it is believed that this digital ruble will allow these zones to be seamlessly stitched together to ensure the flow of money from one zone to another, as the central bank calls it seamlessly. let's go, parnaur, i had two on izo, here, by the way, he's also an uneven little thing, he's alive, just like yours , we open the shell, what's the whole thing we're eating, we're eating, yes, yes, well, no, guys, try it, i'm very... delicious, i can eat 10 kilograms, in italy rocfil, not in italy, first time in i tried it in russia, and you have bathhouses in italy, yes, but mine is very popular , we don’t have options for roasting the meat, we think that this particular roast is ideal for this sauce, you dared

to do it, yes, that’s it this is very, very cool, yes , what are you going to cook for fillet alenina, i will now marinate with currant tincture, cool, and i want to mix four simple ingredients, beets, green... buckwheat, fern and goat cheese. well then let's start, let's go. premiere: chefs on wheels. today is the first one. vodka veda product stetellar group a good russian is a dead russian is nargiz zakirova, with whom we had a chance to talk, such an immodest question , but how did you get to moscow? nargiz fell for it and told us a lot of interesting things, i’m flogging there, i’m there from left to right of all these orcs , she always had russophobia, she just hid it, well in short, they started covering my oxygen, i tried to hype it up

... so they banned weight for 50 years, i think we need to ask for an additional 50 years, i’m going to get myself another tattoo, but if you hit me, i’ll give you citizenship ukraine, on the forehead, on the forehead, come on, we collected 7 million dollars for armament, finances the murder of russian soldiers, and america did not reward her in any way, did not give her citizenship, she is not needed there, she is needed here, so that she can do dirty tricks here dancing in churches, i had the idea to get rid of russian citizenship today we see the betrayal of our country, the vavan and lexus show, on wednesday on the first. give him a brief description and professional qualities. umion, so, good reaction, brilliant speaks german tongue. i was born in a ural village. i come from a peasant family, so i’m very arrogant.

now every day i will kill a colonel, my character is rather weak , it seems to me that i really want to add, gentlemen, what’s the matter, the elimination of the kokh is of great political importance, is it worth risking some valuable agent for the sake of eliminating the kokh? based on real events, a real intelligence officer must be ready for anything, on the razor's edge , the premiere of a serial film, soon on the first one, he is the enemy, she fell in love with him, like a cat you get pleasure, the course is one to one, of course, that is, completely identical, there can be no question, these are the same , let’s explain that this is the bank’s system

that ensures communications with other banks, this is a single platform of the central bank, on which, from which there is a branch in each a bank that participates in the program, if the bank is supported, attached to this scheme, then you can transfer part of your money from an account in your commercial bank to a digital account, let’s call it that now, right? even use it, and using a medium there that you can use a card, a flash drive, even where there is no access to communication, and everything that has access to it, that’s what you can use to enter this area informationally, please, do you like this idea more than non-cash rubles? and you understand, this is scientific and technological progress, you cannot stop it, just as you understand, it is probably not very correct to ask what is better, a plastic card or this smartphone? for calculations of field communications, that is, near-field communications,

now here for we have been saying for a long time, it’s time relax, connection between neighbors, let me explain to the audience, this is when you bring, well, either brought a watch or a phone, at a distance of 5 cm, and ensured the transition, but of course, you first need to register in the phone in your smartphone that this is attached to them - a card, which in turn is tied to such and such an account, then there is a device that is located on the receiver’s side there. absolutely right, i remember when i was, well, ten years ago at a presentation, they pointed to this piece of equipment and talked about how will work, this, although we were all sort of economists and somehow had an idea of ​​how the banking system works, we were told that we would soon use this machine to pay in the subway and everywhere, so we sat there spinning, well, excuse me, like a monkey glasses.

but ten years have passed and you can hardly find a plastic card among young people, they all use this phone and money without thinking about how it works inside, how the tv works, also no one , the children turn on the remote control, they just know how to do it, so here these are ordinary ones, just new ones technologies of non-cash payments, which provide additional control of the central bank over all operations, so yes, basically it is, and of course, additional control and the issue there of absolutely these digital rubles, it is included in the general emission, that is, the issue of the central bank, it is also responsible for us for the release of money into circulation on... non-cash money, that is, technical progress, common to these, this is some part of the world's non-cash, who are now ahead of the rest with digital national, digital national currencies, well, i’m not taking venezuela, with its petra these coins there and petra, well, china, yes,

they’re already trying the yuan digital yuan in china, they’ve already implemented it, it’s already being used there, has a similar experiment failed somewhere? in my opinion, guatemala tried for a long time to introduce these very same ones, but it did not introduce a central bank, it borrowed bitcoins and tried to use these bitcoins for cryptocurrencies, that is, foreign currency, to pay at home, but there was a failure, because despite the fact that the economy is generally insignificant, but nevertheless, of course, this created great inconvenience, because the exchange rate was jumping and, well, it’s generally scary how the state, in my opinion, is, in my understanding, the main, basic monopoly of any state - this is a monopoly on the production of money, how can the state refuse this monopoly in my head does not refuse, and not a single state refuses, except for those that have some kind of microscopic it is so bad for them that it is so bad, especially moreover, there, in my opinion, it was still govotomalala, if

i’m not mistaken, but considering that for 20 years they didn’t have their own currency at all, but there was a dollar, so they don’t care what the dollar is, what bitcoin, actually. it was enough anyway, but in venezuela they just followed the path of the fact that some people there have a twist in their heads , they think that if they introduce some new instrument, it will greatly help the economy, but a miracle did not happen, well, a miracle did not happened because it's the same money, the only thing is here we introduce another concept that there are so-called stable coins , that is, stable, this is when the currency of the central bank, this is separate, and this is now in two words, this is cbdc and there is nothing to talk about, they are introducing in order to increase trust, but they say that it will be exchanged for gold or it was not like that, no, there in its pure form,

they took this currency from the side and introduced it in their country, there at first in the resort area they had such a short, such a short period. but this, by the way, caused discontent among its entrepreneurs, because the course jumped, now, in my opinion, in my opinion, either bermuda, or some other microscopic one, that is, not the top 10 economies in the world are doing this, the states are working in this direction, the europaths are working on the digital dollar and digital euro, here they are the states are considering the path of considering, in my opinion, more correctly, but they are talking about digital... well, this is the one that is being released beyond the limit, i specifically identified it as being issued, yes, they are considering them simply as assets, that is, an asset is not like money , but as an asset, that is you can buy them you

you can mine them, but in the united states it is considered an asset, you can sell it, that ’s absolutely right, that is, if someone. you will sell some product for these bitcoins or ethereums, for god’s sake, taxes were paid on it, the main thing is that taxes were paid on it, and if you mine them, using electronics, then you still have to pay for electricity, because it consumes a lot, yes, but everywhere, everywhere they look very carefully to ensure that there is, well, excuse the taftology, chinese wall, tea ox, chinese wall, between those cryptocurrencies that are issued outside the country, the national economy, that same state monopoly on printing, of course, of course, how do our commercial banks relate to this idea, so you are probably communicating with the banking sector, i am communicating , you know, very differently, of course, whom, because i will explain the idea again, because