i’m hooked on this, actually i would be too, don’t put your finger in your root, well, welcome sister, thank you. there is a big game on the air, and today president vladimir putin spoke via videoconference at the plenary session of the world russian people's council, and he said a number of important things there, and i am not afraid to say bright things. first, president putin explained what russia is up against, let's listen. we are now fighting for the freedom of not

only russia, but the whole world, we openly say that the dictatorship of one hegemon, we we see this, everyone sees it now, she is fading, she has gone, as they say, into disarray, and is simply dangerous for those around her, this is already clear to the entire world majority, but i repeat, it is our country that is now at the forefront of the formation of a more equitable world order. and i want to emphasize that without a sovereign, strong russia, no lasting, stable world order is possible. and president putin did not limit himself to this rather significant and striking statement, but also explained how russia would view attempts at collective west intervention

it is necessary to dismember and plunder russia, force is not obtained, then it is necessary to sow confusion, i want to emphasize that any outside intervention, provocations with the aim of causing ethnic or religious conflicts, we regard as aggressive actions against the country, as an attempt to once again throw terrorism and extremism at russia as a tool of struggle with us and we will react accordingly accordingly. what president putin was talking about for russia, unfortunately, is not a new situation, any historical analogies there is always a danger of simplification and exaggeration. well, i read it the other day, reread it, or rather. memoirs of general

speridovich was responsible for protecting the personal security of emperor nicholas ii. and he wrote that he came to the conclusion that the february revolution would win, by that time he was no longer with the emperor, but was appointed mayor, but he came to the conclusion that the revolution would win when he saw crowds of demonstrators, including soldiers who marched with red banners, and most importantly with slogans, gave war, and the general wrote that when during a war a crowd of people, including military personnel, including with guns, comes, declares, down with the war, here... and

put an end to it immediately, because otherwise the authorities will not be respected, and during a war, if the authorities are not considered, it can be swept away, president putin also spoke about this danger today, referring specifically to the historical experience of russia, i want to ask you, senator vladimirov, you are also a general of the federal security service in the past. that's when you heard what the president said, this is a significant statement, something new or repetition, in general, of what we already know, heard, you know, i listened very carefully to vladimir vladimirovich today , of course, there are a lot of new elements, uh, it’s as if everything has now come together as a single whole, and the most interesting thing is that, or rather, the most important thing is that the president drew attention to the inadmissibility

of internal division, in fact, what the west, especially the united states of america, is trying to achieve, using our multinational state, using different... religions among different segments of the population, you remember the recent events in dagestan and i really liked that these events were suppressed very harshly, and colonel general melikov, who now heads the republic of dagestan, has extensive military experience in the past, nipped it all in the bud, that’s what then the clergy came and asked to forgive those who violated, the general did not agree to this , he... understands perfectly well, where concessions begin, that’s what you just said, then the government loses its real power, we actually, this have already passed, and i think ours the president knows this better than anyone, because he was then at a mature age, in 1991, when people took to the streets, well

, maybe they were not armed, with firearms, they had clubs, some had all sorts of reinforcement bars in their hands . we remember what concerns, how these mass uprisings end, if then we managed to harshly suppress these uprisings, if yeltsin wanted the will to do this, probably then maybe we would not have allowed the collapse of the union, well, now you remember my previous service in agencies of the federal security service, but our hands were tied, sometimes they say where were you looking, because all their lives the security agencies did not work on their own. we worked under the leadership of the party and when the party made a decision, then we followed it, we were forbidden to interfere, i remember very well the day when the monument to dyurzhinsky was demolished, we looked from the dark

windows of house two on the large lubyanka, yes, everyone was standing, but we couldn’t do anything, because it was forbidden for us to go out, there was a crowd led by the possessed gleb yakuni. if you remember, there was such a priest, and stankevich vtsm, then he went to moscow, who were demolishing the monument, it was such madness, then the crowd tried to break into the building itself, well, our guys didn’t let anyone through, they defended it, what happened is what usually the revolution is taking place in the capitals, we remember both the first russian revolution and the october revolution, these are the events of the ninety-first year, everything happens in the capitals, and the periphery simply repeats what is happening in the capital’s things, i i think that vladimir putin monitors the situation very carefully, he spends every day, if you spend a lot of time talking with the military, with representatives of special services, a representative of the military defense industry, the country is

essentially conducting military operations, of course, a lot here depends on the will of our president, well, i have no doubt that it is ironclad, that in this regard, in general... i just acquired such a gigantic experience of how to lead such a huge country, and of course, history does not have a subjunctive mood, but i i assure you, if mikhail sergevich gorbachev and boris nikolayevich yeltsin were not at the helm of the country in those ninety-first years, this tragedy probably would not have happened, well , probably the union would not have disintegrated at all, that is, someone there could have left, but it’s precisely the collapse, without any... troll, without any agreements, i’m sure there would not have happened. and here i want to say one more important thing, i don’t see any signs that president putin wants to use any kind of mass purges, and wants to, as they say, shoot from the stomach. nothing

i haven’t heard anything like this from him and i don’t see any signs that the authorities are planning this. i had the opportunity to share my impressions. with one of the leading, employees, i would say, officials, of the russian intelligence services, and when i expressed to him my concern about, well, sometimes the russian tendency to go from one extreme to the other, he told me: listen, of course, we younger than stalin’s purges, but this is not forgotten, and we understand perfectly well that even apart from how such purges undermine the security of the state, we know that when such purges, as they say, are allowed to take their course, they strike , perhaps first, but certainly second, at

the intelligence services themselves, so it seems to me that what the president spoke about is very reasonable, this is very important, and this is something without which it is difficult. during the war, it’s time to start telling the truth, there is speciation, speciation is a response to the crusade of the collective west against russia, but speciation occurs as part of a wider war, as foreign minister sergei said yesterday lavrov, hybrid and not only hybrid, and when we talk about this, it seems to me that we also need to be as specific as possible, defining what russia’s tasks are in the current situation, and it seems to me that the deputy minister said this very well the other day foreign affairs rebkov. let's listen:

the united states not only unleashed a hybrid war against russia, which is being waged, apparently until the last ukrainian, in which no one has canceled the task of inflicting a strategic defeat on russia, but also demonstrates an intensifying aiming at changing the government here, organizing internal russian unrest. this was stated by the deputy head of the ministry of foreign affairs of the russian federation, sergei rebkov. according to him, in these. in the conditions, the confrontational scenario between moscow and washington has become a given, from which we must proceed, while the deputy minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation did not rule out that further escalation on the part of the united states could lead to a severance of russian-american diplomatic relations. again, very serious words, but in general, we have already heard this. and always - a question arises, and i asked this question in an interview with the minister of foreign affairs a few months ago. what does this mean in practice? in practice, what does this mean,

sergei rebkov gave an answer to this question, let's listen. rebkov does not undertake to predict what exactly will prevail, but it is obvious to him that the successful completion of the svo, a decisive prerequisite - condisio siinin, in order for washington to correct its thinking, remember the well-forgotten experience of the 1970s, when life forced us to recognize the enemy, even on short period, equal to yourself. the americans will have to learn this again if they do not want to step on the vietnamese, afghan and any other pressures again, the diplomat said, noting that in ukraine it seems that such an option is far from being excluded, then prospects will open up in terms of bilateral relations, in terms of the practically eliminated, calling a spade a spade, arms control, not to mention a return to normal ties between our societies and people. it seems to me that rebkov formulated this correctly and very clearly. is not

the question of how to destroy the collective west is not a question of preemptively abandoning, negotiating and even dealing with the collective west, so to speak, for all time, or even more specifically, in the foreseeable future, it is said as is that where we are today, if russia: wants to resume its relations, including with the collective west, primarily with the united states, without capitulation, then this can only be done through victory, a different path, a different path with my point of view is not there what do you think about this, koren shikh-nazarov, general director of mastfilm and famous film director, well, i think you... are absolutely right, i think there is no other way except a decisive victory,

and, in general, , i think this victory should be a victory in principle, uh, no other, what does this mean, and what does a principled, principled victory mean , well, actually, in my opinion, the current ukrainian regime, it will not, in any way, enter into any what kind of negotiations will go to the end, so the question is about that, in theory, a fundamental victory is a victory in which there can be a change in the political regime in ukraine , how possible today i don’t know, i don’t, so to speak, but there is no other way, because in my opinion, the west is not will allow the current ukrainian regime... and they themselves are obvious that they are absolutely not ready for this and do not want

this, and even i think they cannot do this , given the losses ukraine has already suffered, taking into account the subsequent revelation of the arakhs, and this is the head of the faction, zelensky , by the way, for i’m still not very clear about the motives for this statement, because in general it really is a statement, but no one has refuted it, i don’t fully understand the motive here, that’s what it’s connected to. because in principle it seems to be not in their favor, why was it necessary to make it public, although sometimes, you know, yes, we political scientists attach certain special meanings to politicians who express certain thoughts, and sometimes these politicians simply, how artistically he margo simonyan named it,

these are just these cauliflowers from sochi, they they say simply because ... ukrainian society in this sense is generally in solidarity with them, we must understand this, therefore, i think that you are right in the sense that yes, the only opportunity to get out of this. is it somehow worthy and for the interests of our country to win it? i don’t know what the fundamental victory should be? we will now talk with our leading military expert, ruslan pukhov, about the situation on the fronts, and of course, a lot depends on what the situation on

the fronts will be at the moment when there will be any there was no agreement, but i still don’t know. there will be many circumstances, there will be diplomacy, there will be the position of many powers, there will probably be such a factor as how important it is for russia to start paying even more attention to other priorities that are currently receiving attention, but more could be done, for example, one priority, which i think about all the time is adequate resources for the development of artificial intelligence, for military purposes, this is very important, but nevertheless, i think that on the other hand i know what it is a fundamental victory, one american senator was asked to define pornography, he said that he could not give it, but when he looked at it, he would immediately

understand, so, i cannot give a definition of a fundamental victory, this is what we all our opponents will agree, it was a victory. yes, but i, i must also add that this is a conflict, in fact so difficult and complex that this fundamental victory could stretch, by the way, over several companies, i do not exclude this, such examples in history there is, i don’t know, do you remember such a strange thing in the history of russia was the russian-chukchi war, at the end of the 18th century, you don’t even know, right? there were three wars, there were three wars with the chukchi, and russia could not win them, but it’s clear that this one was distant, but i mean three wars, until they recognized, there was a point in recognizing, catherine the empress, how many wars russia had with turkey, with turkey, yes, and it was not by chance that i

said about the diplomatic component, that is, because russia won a couple of times. had to settle for less than what condominium of powers, someone betrayed russia on the battlefield, and then they organized against it what was achieved, then they had to re -introduce hostilities, and in order to bring the matter to the end, i think that this also needs to be really understood, i noticed one very interesting the idea that arakhamia made such a statement, because he... is a very close person to zelensky, without his sanctions, i think he could not make such a statement, the only meaning here is this: firstly, they wanted to show who pushed them to continuation of hostilities, they also leaked johnson, boris johnson of the americans, and secondly, i think that they warned them, if you abandon us, stop helping, then

we will go into disarray, i think that you are absolutely right, and you, but there is one more circumstance, public opinion polls in ukraine show that more and more people are starting to get tired of the war, and i think, i don’t know, but i guess, i admit that it’s quite possible that zelsky and his advisers wanted to show the people that they really are reasonable, flexible people, and if they have made a decision to fight, this is because their... patrons, firstly, left them no other choice, and secondly, because they promised them support. of course, we can only speculate on this matter... yes, but this is dmitry too, you must agree, this is from their point of view, to admit to their voters that they do not lead the country, i think, i think,

koren georgivich, i i think that in this regard , they do not, not only admit the obvious, but it seems to me that the basis of their mandate for power lies in one phrase, the west will help us, and if this power would lose all washington does not reciprocate, i think the european path of development, the europeans, if the europeans openly reject you, well, maybe legitimacy, because what could it be, tell us what is happening, in general, on i know what is happening, there are many different movements in one direction, in the other direction, but the impression is that, firstly, it has become clear that the ukrainian strategic

offensive is simply not, not a subject, even for conversation anymore, which is recognized by everyone, from that other country that this offensive failed, secondly, that at the moment there are stubborn battles, but so far... without significant changes in the situation except that the dynamics have changed somewhat in russia's favor, and that thirdly, ukraine says that everything will depend on her receiving some new, qualitatively more advanced destructive weapons, which they seem to be promising her for now, but in insufficient quantities from zelsky’s point of view. well you practically ate all of mine bread, because now i’m going to tell you about the same thing, that’s how you’ll say it, you’ll say it better and more competently, the butter remains, long, long and

tediously, and you, like the americans, call it tuputa, you managed to put it in a nut shell , my lengthy thoughts, but since you have already given me the floor, the first thing we must state is that not only the ukrainian offensive was bogged down along the entire front line... they tried to carry it out, but the russian troops also firmly hold the initiative, while on the tactical level, but i think that with with the onset of a new weather season, when it will be possible to move troops, this success can be developed into an operational one. i remember how 2 months ago i expressed my concerns in this studio about landings in the kherson direction, ukrainian tactical landings across the dnieper. then it seemed that these were small. they have connected into one large bridgehead and will be able to develop an offensive from there. it is now clear that it was not the mistake of the russian command to allow them to cross there, but having crossed there, they

fell into the trap that they cannot continue to advance, we hit them every time with artillery fire and fire from our aviation, thus the original ukrainian plan to force us to pull our reserves in different directions played against them. in fact, it was they who pulled apart the reserves, threw them on this side, weakened the offensive here , our troops continue to put pressure in the kupyansk area, they are already 6 km from it, so we see that the russian command has, so to speak, a clear strategic plan, and why is it important achieve success at kupyatsk, you know, uh, the pressure is on kharkov, yes, it is extremely important, because if at some point it is possible to blockade kharkov, or capture it, i, as a military... expert , have a feeling , that the ukrainian defense, it will simply crumble, yes, uh, it doesn’t seem to me that the zaluzhny shmanstein, who

fought off the russians so effectively in 1943, 1944, is more likely to resemble the blow that was dealt by the turks to the greeks in in the eighteenth year, they poured into the aegean sea, yes, we have already now we see that the ukrainian military is demanding that no less than 2,000 people be seized and sent to the army, every month, every month, and politicians are already criticizing them for the fact that there is no plan other than to put many more people under arms, here by the way it looks like it is paradoxical that , according to some estimates, we have even fewer people at the front than ukrainians, that is, we manage to restrain the advance with smaller forces, that is, our authorities do not traumatize society there with a new mobilization, yes, at the moment we have, apart from that first wave of partial mobilization , basically everything is being built professionally.

the army is relying on those volunteers who want to join the armed forces, this is all very gratifying, the only thing that worries me very much now is that this does not relate to military operations, it rather relates to foreign policy issues, if you look at president biden for the last 2 years i haven’t attended a single state dinner in the white house for half a month, that is , wherever he appears, it’s something like brezhnev at the end of his reign for 15, 20-30 minutes, that is, i have the feeling that it is quite possible that a whole series of decisions on the supply of ukraine, weapons, and some other things are no longer made by him personally, but by some environment, as was the case at some point with reagan in his second term, when he was already tormented by alzheimer’s, whoever reached the last ear had the decision, because it must be noted that, of course, peace in ukraine - there are two keys, one, in kiev, depends on the good will of this regime;

the other, of course, is in washington, so if in washington, this key will not be turned at some point, and of course, the war and this terrible bloodshed will continue for many, many months, if not years, i was never close to reagan, i never had the opportunity, especially during his second term, to have serious detailed conversations with him, like everyone else, citizens of the country, i could however see... him on television and several times was in a room with a large number of other people, it did not occur to me that he had any -some intellectual limitation and some memory problem, i haven’t seen biden at all for a long time, except on television, well, you don’t have to be a member of his inner circle to see that something is very, very wrong with biden.

very very out of order, and i don't really understand how he can give direction, if you want state policy, i don't think he's a complete puppet, i think his both the secretary of state and his national security advisor, who are working with him in different capacities for almost a decade, which they have a good understanding of washington, i think that while biden is there, it is difficult to count on this, except for one thing, unless circumstances force it, here i want to ask you about the possibility, if you want,

afghan. in ukraine, what do i mean? i don’t know anyone in american military circles who would have expected that the afghan army, the afghan regime would collapse like a house of cards when the united states began to sharply reduce its presence and, in general, made it clear that afghanistan was no longer a priority for america , if he starts. reduction american and european assistance, it may be that everything in ukraine will simply collapse, you know, the ukrainians are taking very serious measures to hide the truth, now we already know that they have colossal human losses, we know that they have a colossal shortage, there, the military registration and enlistment office was given a certain plan, and he was able to fulfill it in a month by only 8%, as for

economic... military assistance, we all know that the payment of pensions, benefits, medical assistance, all this comes from the west, in this sense, ukraine absolutely like here is a seriously ill patient on tubes, and sitting in the hospital, how long he will last, when either all of these tubes or part of these tubes are pulled out, i don’t know, one thing i can say is that, unlike most russian observers, i was considering a way out of afghanistan. not as a shameful defeat to the united states, but an attempt by the united states, but an attempt in some way, to return this dislocation that america was forced to endure for 20 years, because some people came and told a number of presidents, now we will get out and it will be the new september 11, and biden was not afraid to lose face and, as it were, cut off the tail of this beloved cat, not in parts, but completely, so i personally, as at least as

an outside observer, you are better off. i can easily imagine that the newly elected president trump will immediately say to stop wasting american taxpayer money and will simply immediately stop the supply. certain types of assistance, what would happen in ukraine then? well, i think that firstly, it would simultaneously hit the ukrainian economy according to its military machine, which feeds on these tubes of the united states, and of course, this was a powerful signal, to a whole number of people who themselves have no view on this policy, look to washington, and if the poles maybe will help to the last, then a number of european allies of the united states will simply take this as a direct signal and will also cut off their assistance, so in my opinion, it is quite possible that all this, all this bloody hell organized by zelsky, it may stop next year

at the same time, the question is different, we, russian citizens, yes, must understand that we cannot rely on the optimistic option, we must proceed from the pessimistic option, if suddenly everything goes well, well, thank god, but we must be prepared hold the blow as long as necessary, since we are talking about protecting our sovereignty and our values. ruslan, thank you very much, now we will go to advertising and after that we will talk about why i am absolutely not sure that trump will become the next president. we're going to advertising, we'll be back literally in a few minutes. what is hidden behind the external appearance of the loskommayr, the federal president of germany, you have to think about who is inciting the war here, this war is ours with the russians. to declare war on russia if you are trading with it for a trillion euros is impossible. first, he must

cut economic ties. every european politician today has the role of an executioner, the executioner of our united people. the general president of germany is a position that does not involve any responsibility, but it allows. choosing between the interests of the country and personal interests as a politician chose the latter whose interests he actually lobbies and will do exactly what the owners said, destroy russia in every way, frank walter sheinmay, tiger, dolls of the heir tutti, tomorrow on the first. beersman bourbon, a product of the stellar group. the palm

is open. under no circumstances should it be clenched into a fist. the only place where there could be a gun is in the left hand under the napkin. we can only avoid opening a second front. if in one blow we decapitate the leadership of countries hostile to us. it became known that the germans are preparing a large-scale operation in tigeran. dear gevorg, all six umbrellas that you ordered for your father’s pastry shop are ready. six umbrellas meant six paratroopers. you are in charge, you must be the smartest, the most careful. are they germans or not? and then i saw an army boot. they don't wear these in iran. shoot. i wanted to, yes, i hope we won’t shoot, i’ve been working for four years now, during this time i didn’t ask you for anything, we found these six german radio operators, and someone else will take it, drink some water, comrade stalin grinned

, six germans were brought into the hall, whom we found, hurray, for the eightieth anniversary of the tehran conference, on sunday at the first. there's a big game on the air. 60 years ago , president john kennedy was shot and killed. there is an official version, but we still don’t definitively know why. then his brother, robert kennedy, was killed. again, we know. he did this, there is an official version of why, but this is also unknown for sure. and so i hear more and more conversations about whether something will happen similar with donald trump. i do not have

the slightest information about any conspiracies against the former president. i don’t even want to speculate on this topic, but here’s what i can say with confidence: while the pro is doing everything possible and impossible to stop trump, well, at first there were all these impeachment procedures, which were built on nothing, then at first there were four, now there are already five different criminal civil trials that are now being conducted against trump, and uh, even the question is not whether he’s screwed or not, but in these processes, the main thing is that when you throw something like that, constantly, every day, to everyone’s misfortune, it is shown on television.

the calculation is that something will stick, and the most inopportune moment will stick, when trump goes through the primary elections, instead of looking at his pre-election speeches, listening to his pre-election promises, instead the voter will watch him appear once again in court, he listens once again about what a scoundrel he is, a fraudster, but just public opinion showed that the republican base viewed it as a politicized disgusting spectacle, only to become even more supportive of trump. and recent polls have begun to show that the electorate as a whole is not very responsive to this, and on issues of public opinion, trump has managed to pull ahead of biden. of course, not without the help of biden himself, not conscious help, in terms

of those ailments of his mistakes that we just talked about, i thought what else they would throw against trump, they threw today, this is called the cock network, the cock network is network of charles kok, a billionaire who is also over 80 years old. one of the richest people in the usa, very conservative, who positions himself not as a conservative, but as a libertarian, who had many doubts about trump, he did not hide them, but he never went against him politically on many of his issues supported, today it was announced that this coco network, this... dozens of billionaires

, that they decided to support nicky haley against him, remember this, that lady who was the governor, she was, no, she was an ambassador, and before that she was, and before that she was the governor of south carolina, also of indian origin, by the way, this is now fashionable, if she had been elected, she could have been on... talking with the english prime minister, but this is a joke, but seriously nikki haley, unlike trump's other leading rival, florida governor desantis, is known to be an extreme neoconservative, with a heart-breaking love for ukraine and , of course, israel. if she had been elected, if she had been elected, then that’s all our conversations. o

how the united states will reduce aid to ukraine, or stop this aid, in general , these conversations could turn out to be untenable, i say cautiously, they could, because what a person says during the election campaign and what he does is far from one thing and the same, but at least hopes that a change of administration in washington could lead to a change in policy, these hopes would have turned out to be, well, let’s say, unfounded; we are now talking about the existing financial and political machine, which has already announced that they they won't just be support nikihali, they will conduct an active election campaign, they will spend hundreds of millions of dollars , they have already started making television commercials exposing trump and telling how such a person, even if... it is impossible to elect, maybe

, maybe, as they say in in such cases, there is no scarier than a cat, there is no beast, it turns out that it is menacing , a meowing cat, not a real tiger, i don’t know, but this is again a new element in the company, which creates an additional factor of uncertainty and therefore you are absolutely right that is happening in the united states, i believe that we should not perceive american foreign policy as something carved out of granite, as something not made of, but we must also understand how difficult it would be to change it due to the frantic resistance trying to change it , the countries are facing american globalists, well now let's talk about something else, let's talk about what is happening in the middle east, where there is now a pause in

hostilities, where hostages are now being released, but here's what they are saying... let's listen, now you have a few days break, but we will return to the battle , and we will act on a larger scale and more powerfully, the battles will take place throughout the gaza strip, well, like this, very specifically, and if you look again at issues of public opinion in israel , there seems to be a strong majority of the population who really wants to put an end to hamas, and how they talk about such cases in human terms, i understand them, after the horror that they experienced, which they saw on october 7, i understand this kind of mood, but that’s why what distinguishes statesmen from those who conduct public affairs is that they must have

a different level of sense of responsibility and must wonder where the new escalation is: not just against hamas, really against the hundreds of thousands of millions of palestinians living in gaza, where this could lead israel , what do you think, colin georgivich, well, first of all, i’ll insert two words, so my own about trump, it seems to me that i talked about this a long time ago, but i have such an association that trump is what something like that similar to elson in our politics, when he appeared in the late eighties, and of course there was a lot of irrationality in this, but strictly speaking, it was difficult to stop him then, it seems to me that the same thing is happening with trump, by the way, in fact, in contrast

from yeltsin, who really turned the entire, entire policy of russia completely, in my opinion, ruslan, trump will not do this, in my opinion, the term showed that, in principle, he was under strong control in general, so to speak, the establishment and did what , what, what is needed do, i think that , in my opinion, he will not stop the war in ukraine, he can talk about it, but in my opinion he will not do it, because i understand that for the american establishment, it is obvious that the war in ukraine, it is beneficial for america, even half-lost, it is not beneficial for them if ukraine suffers a fundamental defeat , which we talked about, but this is the current war, but this binds russia, this, of course , allows them to largely dictate terms to europe, that is, this in general

quite profitable, i don’t think trump will go to change all this, but it seems to me that it will still be quite difficult to stop it, because... i think there’s a moment here, like it was with yeltsin, the more they tried to stop him, the more he gained popularity, if you remember , so to speak, no matter what he did, he would fall off the bridge, or get drunk, it’s still as they say , worked for him, it seems to me that approximately the same thing is happening, karan, on the one hand, i am ready to subscribe to every word you say, but it seems to me that there is one... significant difference, against yeltsin, there was a group that did not have the will to win, senile people, against trump , i agree, ruthless, american establishment, yes, it’s true, this, this, this,

you noticed correctly, this, yes, this is the difference, it’s serious, so i’m not saying this unequivocally, but i’m saying that it still can - you said, this is absolutely correct, we must take this possibility into account, yes, these are, now, as for yours, the question of gas, but what is happening now in any case is not bad, it is good, after all, it is truce, today, there are people, israelis, who are being released, there is, i understand, the delivery of some kind of humanitarian aid in gaza, that is, at least some respite for the people, so to speak, who are there. as far as israel is concerned, you said correctly, politicians say one thing and then do it differently, as far as israel is ready. it’s realistic to continue the operation at the same pace at this rate, i don’t know, i’m not sure about this, it’s quite

possible that there is some kind of its own, its own plan, which is already changing somewhat, changing the picture, because you know, well, in principle - it’s not very clear what israel can achieve now, that is, ideally, i understand that part, so to speak, of israel’s radical rights, so to speak, netanyahu’s ideal situation in general is for the palestinians to leave gaza completely, for jordan to accept them , egypt, somehow resolve this issue completely with the ghazai, but this obviously can’t work out , so as far as so to speak, they will continue to act in this spirit, if they manage to free a large number of hostages, they certainly seem to me strongly will change... the situation inside israel, in netanyahu’s sense, this will be a big plus for him , after all, it is quite possible that these

belligerent statements will be followed by some kind of situation that will find at least some kind of compromise, because that this conflict, of course, in my opinion, is no longer beneficial either to israel on such a scale, or to the americans, by the way, it seems to me that this is no longer beneficial to the americans, because it is clear that the entire muslim world: this time it is really against them strongly united, yes he is now is not in effect yet, but if this continues, they risk greatly undermining their positions in the middle east , which is not at all beneficial for them now, so we need to see what will happen in these 2 days, it is clear that they are making these harsh statements statements, they should make them, but i have a feeling that there is some kind of plan behind this, which can lead to some kind of compromise solution, so to speak. thank you, we're leaving for advertising, we'll be back in a few minutes.

so, he was sent to us, the foremen, repairman. how many locomotives do you have? that’s it, stepan, give me a position, now i ’ll be a trusted person here, what are you looking at? svidanka? what's your name? ignat! studi, why do you need it? a trophy, not even a steam locomotive , i’ll go further, there’s a dead man living on an island, you kill him again, and we got here, where is your ignat, he left, he’ll come. why are there such hidden secrets about a german woman? a german woman against you is not a pub, listen to her heart. vladimirov,

he will overpower you, you need to run, the edge is on saturday, on the first. well, it’s just in time, he’s gone, having spoken, leonid kuravlev was adored by the audience, he got great roles , each was a masterpiece, but by the end of his life he was tired of attention and did not want to see even those who were seemingly closest to him, he was squeezed, he was a very closed person, he did not let anyone into his world just like that, when there is a crowd - it always scares me a little, he spent his last days in a hospice, and before that he lived for many months in a boarding house for the elderly. people, which everyone found out about only after his hospitalization. dad was a contradictory person, dad had mood swings, and it’s already hard for me to remember. our exclusive home archive

of the national artist, the son of the legendary actor vasily kuravlev breaks the silence. he is ready to answer all the questions: why did the father end up in a boarding house, did he want to date his daughter, and was seclusion his conscious choice? exclusive with dmitry borisov. premiere on saturday on the first. there's a big game on the air, and now i've asked all of our participants to take a few minutes to express their own thoughts impressions where we haven’t talked yet and where they consider it important, ruslan , you know, when korolin georgivich was telling me, two things came to mind: one, when these terrible

events happened on october 7, on the one hand, as a person , i... i saw the grief of people, on the other hand, i, as a military expert, experienced some kind of, you know, voluptuous satisfaction, because we are always tormented by the question of how stalin was warned so many times, yes, but he did not follow by the council of their intelligence services in the forty-first year, how did it happen that the israelis missed 50 years ago - in the year seventy-three, that egypt would attack them without even having a chance to win, yes, that’s why. sometimes there are things that you see, and sometimes there are things that accumulate and you don’t see them, and you will only see them when you have broken these eggs, so as a military analyst , this situation, not that it calmed me down, she, i am now less traumatized by this situation, and one more thing, if we return to israel, this will be a direct, direct bridge

with what he said. karon georgievich, my late, good friend, konstantin makienko, with whom we worked together to create a center for the analysis of strategy and technology, at one time wrote an article entitled israel’s experience of the crusaders, where he said that the project of creating the state of israel could quite possibly end in failure, this does not mean that all the jews will be exterminated, no, they will simply disperse somewhere, as they once dispersed - after the roman empire conquered palestine, this was due to the fact that israel: for a long time lived in two colossal supports. the first is immigrants who came to israel , including from the post-soviet space, the second is money, and money is primarily the united states, right? accordingly, if one support of emigrants stops coming, the second support in the form of money from the united states will not immediately fall, but will decrease. this can create

an absolute, seemingly unacceptable situation. because what you said, the arabs are not going anywhere, they cannot be moved to space, yes, jordan and egypt are not eager to take in the unfortunate radical refugees for themselves, no matter what the israelis do, they can plow this gas 10 times back and forth, but they cannot genoculate these people, as the germans did with the jews, so on a large scale in the end, this situation is a dead end, it doesn’t solve for them, but then i’ll hook back to ruslan, because he really said very interesting thoughts, which, indeed, i also have such associations, israel today looks like you remember, it was like this kingdom jerusalem, kingdom of jerusalem, crusader kingdom, which by the way existed in the middle east there for about

100 years, 100 or so. even more years, but there is some kind of internal metaphysical problem in general, which was apparently not initially taken into account by the founders of israel , the whole point is that ancient israel, this and that, that dream country, temple, country of the sacred temple for jews, so to speak, it was an eastern country, it was part of the east, moreover, it died fighting the west, with ancient rome. when did it become modern? israel was founded, then it was already founded as part of the west, and it truly became a popular enclave, and this is exactly how it is perceived in the middle east, the muslim world, which cannot come to terms with this in any way, if israel turned again, became part of the east, but

as far as this is possible today, especially since from the point of view there, by the way... one ethnic group is the simites, they are actually very close, islam and judaism are actually quite close, there is a huge mutual influence, so to speak, but but in these 2,000 years jews became part of the west, so they bring this western idea here to the middle east, this seems to me to be the main metaphysical problem of the existence of israel, what to do with it, i don’t know, if it again became part of the east, it would accepted, but for this he needs to renounce the united states , for this and for this he would have to become another israel, another israel, yes , to what extent this is possible, i don’t know, this, this, it seems to me, is the main internal problem of the whole this, all this drama,

you know, when i talk with people in the region, they keep telling me, asking me, it’s very alarming: can we really now sign some kind of truce with ukraine ? people are very worried, they remember the istanbul agreement, which was initialed, i answer , that no... because the time is different, nothing happened then , a special military operation had just begun and there was an opportunity to prevent bloodshed, which is what our negotiators actually sought, in this regard, i want to remember now, today i have only one journalist i asked, you know, they speak for the minister of justice of ukraine, i don’t remember her last name, she said that we would sign a peace agreement with russia subject to the payment of gigantic reparations. my answer was very short. we will sign with another regime, and the one that is now in kiev, we will not sign anything with it, because we have clear words from the president, repeated many times by pyskov, that the goals of the special

military operation remain unchanged. many years have passed in america, when i hear how america is sometimes ridiculed in russia, when they only talk about american imperfections. it seems to me that this is unreasonable and unfair, and unreasonable and unfair, first of all, not in relation to america, in relation to russia, because when you are dealing with such an enemy, you must perceive this enemy as realistically as possible, and not create handy caricature. america is a great power, america is a country with a very powerful army, although i’m not sure about such a powerful one. as many in russia seem to think, it seems to me that america has proven its ability to technologically innovation, but also the fact that people

still strive to go to america, to speak for themselves, all these things, from my point of view, must be recognized, they deserve respect, but something else must be recognized. america is the only country in the modern world. which i would not be afraid to call a country of classic systemic genocide, i don’t know a single country, but i’m not talking naturally about hitler’s germany, maybe the turks during the first world war in relation to the armenians, but today i don’t know a single country that has the same political continuity that the us has had for many decades. destroyed its indigenous population, that is, the indians. if someone tells me that it was not genocide, when practically the entire indian population, with the exception of a very few, who were sort of

allowed to become americans, if that is not genocide, then i don’t know what genocide is. now turning to the last century, well, who else besides hitler. committed such a crime as using atomic bombs, deliberately, against civilians, not against an advancing enemy, not against an enemy approaching your capital, at the end of the war, when the outcome of the war with japan was already clear, by the way, after the first atomic bomb dropped on hiersima, it was obvious how scary it was to destroy this weapon, president trumin, dropped this bomb, there are , of course, historians, revisionists who write about it,