[000:00:00;00] this was stated and, accordingly, in the greeting in the greeting that you mentioned, in the speech, ushakova, i think that ushakov is an assistant to the president, absolutely right, and it seems to me that in this sense, this event, it strengthened that a line, the embodiment of which at its initial stage was evgeniy maksimovich pryamakov. this is a line towards independence, towards asserting our own russian identity in a sea of ​​international problems, defending our interests, in the face of various kinds of threats, and these threats are great, this was stated very clearly, and the indecent behavior of our opponents was also stated very clearly by lavrov, i

think, messiah. this is how the americans say, the word may be suitable for ours, or in any case, what conclusion can be drawn is that we stand very, very firmly, we do not succumb to any pressure, and we will, and are ready to support our own interests everywhere in everything and always, is it fair to say that the composition largely reflected the current situation in the world, noticeably fewer representatives collective west, significantly more representatives of the south? well, of course, naturally this is so , and this was to be expected, no miracles happened, but the fact that there were a lot of representatives of the global south and that there were even some representatives of some

individual, collective west who... understand russia, sympathize russia and are ready to conduct a dialogue with us, i think this is also a feature of the current primakov readings, which reflect a situation leading to the fact that more and more people are convinced that the current course of the west in relations with russia, it it is destructive, it is unconstructive, of these countries, especially in the economic sphere, if we take the same sanctions policy. thank you, alexander, the same question, what was, from your point of view, the most important in the international agenda of the council, and do you agree with the council that, in general, two different events, but a very similar approach to what is happening in the world, to to what

has long been... russia? yes, that's right, i completely agree. i wanted to draw your attention to the following: now mr. naumkin said the word interests several times. this indeed, international politics is a question of interests, but the second word, which usually determines the essence of the state and the essence of its global positioning, is also values. and so , if, i think, the pryamakovsky doctrines. mainly talked about interests, then at our congress, the world russian people's council, which is headed by the patriarch , where the president also took part, and he listened very carefully to the speech of the patriarch and all the speakers, it was clear that he takes this very, very seriously , moreover, he had an excellent program speech, and so it was about values, not so much about

interests, although about interests too, but mainly... values, this is the conflict that, in general, at the all-russian military district, which we constantly discuss , it began with a conflict of interests, gradually grew into opposition to civilization, and it is no coincidence that this anniversary, anniversary forum of the world russian people's council was dedicated specifically to the russian world, this is the problem of the russian world, the president spoke about the russian world, the patriarch spoke about the russian world. all the speakers, and what is the russian world? the russian world, in essence, is a civilization, a special civilization, it is not only ethnic russians, it is not only all eastern slavs, including ukrainians and belarusians, this is what, in general, is similar, eurasian philosophers called russia as a continent, russia as eurasia, which has its own civilizational basis, which unites

peoples, bonded by a unity of fate, but which have historically developed around the russian people, and it is important that in the president’s speech, in the work of the sections, it was emphasized everywhere with full respect. how did they determine who the russians were? well, the presidents’ speech was even generally quite from the patriarch, yes from the patriarch, they had a very interesting thing in their speech, that it was time to abandon modesty in the relations of the russian people, we must understand by it ethnicity, the president said ethnicity, also yes culture yes.. . are open, but if we ignore and are ashamed of ourselves , then we will not attract anyone to us, we will not save ourselves, we will not save our demography, we will not rebuild the economy, that is, we

must ultimately understand that our people, the russian people, even in their ethnic core, are a fundamental part of our society, and then there is culture, language, history, religion, of course, spirit. ethical values, traditional values ​​that we talked about, and the russian world, that’s what’s important , it’s not just that, but it’s not only russians, it’s this, russians and that, those who have rallied around us, this is civilization, this is a new actor, if you like, in international relations, that is, before we thought that we were a state that shared western values, we part of western civilization, but we have a conflict of interests with them, and now it sounds more and more clearly... from top officials in the state, from our people, from cultural figures, there from the church, from politics, from the authorities,

that we are not western civilization, we are our own russian civilization, which is called the russian world, but that this is a cultural code, and every person who shares it with us, who agrees with these values, who considers themselves part of a single destiny, they and there are russians, that is, there is just no... hint of nationalism, no, but nevertheless, and belittling the role of our great people, it ’s also time to say goodbye to this, because it leads to completely destructive consequences. unfortunately, i did not have the opportunity to be at primakov’s readings, nor at these, nor earlier ones, so i completely rely, academician, on your description, your conclusions, uh, i was at the council for the first time and even spoke there at your invitation, and first of all, of course, i was struck by the energy of the audience, a huge audience, in the cathedral of christ

savior, it just seemed to me that some new russian elite had come, naturally there were many representatives of the clergy, but in fact, that was me. most of all, this is the number of people there in military uniforms, and in the uniforms of generals, in the uniforms of junior officers, and even private sergeants and so on, i just looked at these people, they clearly had the feeling that this was their event, they were not just invited, they had the feeling that it was theirs... it made an impression on me, i was also impressed that both president putin and patriarch kiril spoke when defining the russian people, yes, of course, they talked about ethnicity, and this is very important, but on the other

hand, this is a very broad definition of the russian people, well, you understand , not milligrams of chauvinism, but some kind of racism, some kind of disrespect for others. and in general, as i understand it, it was clearly said that if a person considers himself russian, especially if he speaks russian, if he belongs to russian culture, and if he, of course, wants success for his homeland, then this a russian person, that’s right, and this is a very russian trait, because each people has , in fact, its own attitudes, its own values, and being russian already includes... being open, being predisposed to friendship and their inclusion, if whatever, there is such a bad word inclusiveness, that is, it is western, because it is western, but in general the meaning there is very good, the russians are those who do not

reject other peoples, include them, who live with them, and if these peoples want to become russian, please, if they want stay on our own, please, any, any option is acceptable for us, this is our , if you like, russian trait, that is, how can it be that if a person becomes a chauvinist, a racist, he ceases to be russian, this is because it contradicts our cultural code. well, to finish our conversation on this topic, i want to ask you, academician. you, too, were invited to the russian cathedral, i was invited, yes, but it coincided with the primerkovsky council, and so, a lot was said, at least i was not present there all the time either, because that i had to deal with the program, but a lot was said, including by alexander, about the fact that russia is not just a state, but a state of civilization, a state, i wrote about this, you know very well, much better than

in relation to here’s the idea that now russia appears, if you like, in a new guise, and offers, i don’t know if you can say a new ideology, but at least, practically yes, practically yes, we need at least a new approach to the world, that’s how it is is perceived, in this very important audience for russia, in the former third world now the collective south? well, it seems to me that we still need to do a lot in order to develop this idea, which in particular was excellently expressed in the president’s speech, this is what you talked about, i think that we need to develop it, it just should be such a super task , in particular the academic community too, in order to make it more understandable. corners of this great vast global south, and

if we talk about the concept of the state, of civilization, which we have been developing for a long time, including my colleagues at the institute, even past generations, and you headed the institute of orientalism, is a scientific leader, absolutely right, and there are other older generations of our scientists who have already passed away, they put forward these ideas, here is russia as a state of civilization, and today both the chinese and the indians are talking about this, these two pillars of the asian world, which are very closely connected with us today, i think that the fact that they position themselves very close to us, in a similar hypostasis, i think, will only strengthen us, that's how you say, with our openness, in order to uh, be like that, and the last thing that i want to say briefly is that now we have, so to speak, in fashion, well, this may be the wrong expression, but scientists are working on the problem of identity, the word,

of course, is also not entirely ours , but very popular now, in academic science, here is the development of what russian russian, russian identity is, this is very important, now i participated in the creation of a new textbook on russian identity, which is still in the first version, i think this very important in order to the younger generation learned what we want to tell them. thank you. we talked about what was happening in moscow, good, important, but let’s just say that the process is very important, but , as you rightly said, there is still a lot of work ahead, both for the cathedral and for russian international affairs scholars, each to their own, but this is really new approach, new audiences, this is very cool, this... inspires optimism

, but you can’t get through here on autopilot, no, i even heard such a parallel, here is the russian people, you remember, during the soviet era union, a new historical community, the soviet people, which included academician bramley, who developed this, included all nations, all nationalities living on the territory of the soviet union, and now i also heard such a parallel that the russian people are also historical a community that includes... also all nationalities, and what you said was that there were quite a large number of military personnel there, not only of the older generation, but also young people, well, this is the time, because, in principle, russia is now protects the russian world donbass, after all, where it all began, because i never tire of saying that the president, by the way, said this, that our conflict with ukraine is not about territories. this is primarily about human rights, and the basic right

of a person to speak his native language, read books in his native language, learn his native language, and values, the main value for us is the exclusion of glorification, nazism in any, in any form, therefore, it is not surprising that it is the military class, including young people, who defend... the russian world and naturally present at uh, this meeting, russian and becomes and becomes the emerging new russian elite. russian, yes, patriotic, what made me very happy at your cathedral is that those participants whom i managed to listen to, from my point of view, spoke about the most, maybe not the most important, but about the most relevant,

namely about the fact that the future structure of the world will largely depend on how the war in ukraine ends. not a war around ukraine and that not only from the point of view of russia’s interests in ukraine in europe, but also the future structure of the world, and the future, well, if you want, the future fate of russia as a great power, for all this there is no alternative to victory in this war, absolutely true, this was the main thought of all sections, ideological, international, demographic, dedicated to education, spatial development , youth, there were many sections, and the main one, of course, this was the main idea of ​​this council, without victory, without our complete victory, we as the russian world, as a state, civilization,

as a great power, will not be able to take place, now we are passing the most important, the most important exam for precisely our world historical mission, vitali, you agree that at collective yoga, here you may be... i don’t want further confrontation, i don’t want some kind of unpredictable escalation, but on the other hand , if russia had not won, then this would not have strengthened russia’s position in the collective south, or am i mistaken, not only are you not mistaken, i think that such an option is excluded, we simply have to defeat it, quite obviously, but the global the south, because, well, firstly, it consists of many different units, including quite weak, small ones that sympathize with us, but naturally fear pressure and any kind of aggression from the outside, leaders, the global west or the collective west , he is not global, he is already a minority, but nevertheless

he is very strong, he has great military and financial power, and of course he has experience in providing... especially to small countries, this is what sometimes happens with voting on various forums or with the reaction of small states to certain events, when we are told that they are completely with us , they are completely in solidarity, they understand us , but it is clear that from their behavior that they are afraid, no one wants risks, they need to survive, well, it is clear that only our victory can help them overcome these fears completely. to become what they, by virtue of their interests, and values, too, are. general, do you agree with this, agree, completely agree, because without our victory, of course, there will be no unity,

no rise of the russian world, the russian nation there won’t be, so only the capitulation of ukraine, all this talk, a truce, a freeze, the korean option, some other option, they mean nothing, i... i think that our leadership will not agree to this, firstly, and before fulfilling at least the initial minimum goals of the special military operation and , more broadly speaking, then of course, there must be a complete capitulation of ukraine and acceptance of all our conditions in the field of security, this is accession to nato and neutrality and disarmament, by the way, all that , what was written down for everyone... in those istanbul the agreements that the americans and the british tore down in april, the prokrainians at the beginning seemed to be ready even, no, no, you know , dmitry, we talked about this, and i say, we did everything right at the beginning, we started this operation very correctly, we destroyed everything that needed to be destroyed, they asked for negotiations, so to speak, because they realized that

what would happen next would be a complete defeat, and then , unfortunately, we began to show, as the president said, gestures of goodwill, complete profanation and continuation of the conflict . thank you, we're leaving for advertising, we'll be back in just a few minutes. the new president of argentina, javier meley. now i will kill the state, i will be cool, i am such a hyper-ultra-anarchist, to hell with the ministry of education, to hell with the ministry of transport, why did the puppeteers install it, inflation in argentina in the area: 140% economy in a very serious crisis, this man is the king of the street, and he can take the people out into the streets and declare those old elites extreme, they drag him to

the presidency, he wins and immediately transfers all the main power functions to the hands of a woman, which is connected with the united states of america, you had to fight evil, and you sided with him, he said that he was going to break ties with russia, the format of the manan doctrine is being implemented, when the united states of america begins to return countries to latin. to america, it will be a villain on the throne, he will really hand over the country to the americans , in the vada i saw your state, javier miley , who is dearer than everyone else, or don’t cry for me argentina, dolls of the heir tutti, tomorrow on the first, rum, castra, product stellar group, palm open. under no circumstances should it be clenched into a fist. the only place where there could be a gun is in the left hand under

the napkin. we can avoid opening a second front only if we decapitate the leadership of countries hostile to us with one blow. it became known that the germans were preparing a large-scale operation in tigeran. dear gevorg, all six umbrellas that you ordered for your father’s pastry shop are ready. six umbrellas meant six paratroopers. you have to be the smartest, the most careful, germans or not, then i saw an army boot, in iran they don’t wear them like that, i wanted to shoot, right? i hope we won’t shoot, during this time i didn’t ask you for anything, we found these six german radio operators, and someone else will take it, drink some water, comrade stalin grinned, six germans were brought into the hall, who ours and we, hurray, for the eightieth anniversary of the tehran conference on sunday on

the first, a big game is on air, we just talked about how russia sees the world, what russia would like to achieve in the international arena. and how for russia there is no alternative to victory in the fight for ukraine, but absolutely it is clear when you look at what is happening today on the world stage that russia's desires, russia's plans, that they continue to run into fierce resistance from the collective

west are, first of all, united. let's look at two statements that rebkov made in recent days in different contexts . because of washington, relations have become thinner to such an extent that they have broken. but again we emphasize again at different levels that the russian country will never initiate such a step, if this happens, it will happen as a result of decisions and actions of washington, we are in a state of severe confrontation, a total hybrid war is being waged against us, this is not hidden, and here... it is also known that the united states continues to import rare earth

metals and nuclear fuel from russia, is the russian federation considering the possibility of limiting the export of these categories goods on the condition that the united states will use them, for example, in the production of strategic weapons. almost every week there is a signal from washington that the democratic community states must become self-sufficient in this kind of materials and reduce it. dependence on countries not included in this select community, so i think there is no subject for any of our proactive steps. there are many reasons to act this way, based only on the task of making a gesture or demonstrating toughness in us relations, but we must look at the situation as a whole; we must not shoot ourselves in the foot and cause economic damage to ourselves. in principle, today a certain balance in this area is optimal, we have other ways they are used, including asymmetrical ones, to respond to the americans for their hard anti-russian line. and its numerous manifestations, that is, on the one hand, uh,

mr. ribkov gave a very harsh assessment of american actions. intentions of the american administration and i’m not afraid to say, well, in general, he spoke rather pessimistically about the possibilities of improving relations with the united states in the foreseeable future and said that russia , although it would probably like it, is not going to focus on such an improvement, but on the other hand, the general, correct me if you disagree, in general , he spoke very restrainedly, carefully, uh, there is a possibility of breaking diplomatic relations, but russia will under no circumstances initiate this break, and russia strives to preserve ties, if a break occurs, then it will be the initiative of another country, and he spoke about rare metals, and

also made it clear that since the sale of these rare metals is in the interests of russia, russia will not shoot itself in the foot, that is, the time when the west is expanding, sectional pressure is on russia , russia continues to take this more balanced, perhaps, i would rather say, restrained approach on the issue of diplomatic contacts with the united states and on the issue of trade with america, do you agree with this. do you think about these statements? i completely agree that sergei alekseevich, as in his usual manner, on the one hand tough, on the other hand, without extremism, of course, russia will not initiate a severance of diplomatic relations with the united states, although theoretically

this option cannot be excluded, why? because, well, in my opinion, it is obvious to everyone that ukraine is not succeeding, and not only there is this famous counter-offensive or offensive, but in general it is not working out in many aspects of this operation and in terms of the mobilization contingent, in the supply of weapons, in reduction in financial flows, due to the already obvious skepticism in western capitals, including, by the way, in the united states, especially in the american congress, although we cannot cast a spell that everyone supports, even johnson said yesterday that we are not we can allow putin to march around europe, but in my opinion he said it quite so, you know, somehow routinely, that the most important thing for us is still the southern border, and not help to ukraine, but this is their internal matter, but for

the biden administration, of course , i... said again, for us the end of this operation means the complete capitulation of ukraine and the fulfillment of all our conditions without any compromises, for the biden administration this is deadly, i don’t know what they can do, i very much doubt it, that they will go into the open, armed intervention, because this is a path to nowhere, this is a nuclear apocalypse, a toughening of its position in the diplomatic sphere, well, first of course, not a break there, a lowering of the level, the recall of the ambassador, that is, such and such steps on the part of the united states, they are quite possible, and i think the worse ukraine’s position on the battlefield becomes, and the less the administration’s ability to flood ukraine with money and weapons, and the objective

prerequisites for this are being formed in the united states, not to mention europe, they they cannot agree in any way on a package of military assistance, or economic assistance, or negotiations on joining the european union, despite the hysterical statements of this funder, so some political demarches, sanctions have already been tightened, in my opinion, there is nowhere to go, now as for the economic on the nuclear side. i’m afraid to say percentages, but a very large percentage of nuclear fuel is supplied by russia, americans simply objectively cannot refuse russian fuel, because it is simply nowhere to be found, and this is in the interests of russia, this supply fuel, you know, this is fuel for this fuel is not for the production of warheads, this is fuel for nuclear

power plants, this is for energy, then this is a highly competitive world market, i think that would be wrong, but for rare earth metals, here too interesting situation, and again i don’t know the percentages, but the americans get the bulk of it from china and from us china, and naturally two, as they have written in all doctrinal documents, two opponents, if not enemies, but as for rarely earth metals, without which neither electronics nor entire industries can exist, they just get enemies from their opponents in parentheses, this, by the way, is typical for americans, they don’t give a damn about any principles there, if this is necessary

to ensure their own commercial interests and security there, they will bypass any sanctions and justify this bypass, and the europeans will be told, well , let’s hold out, we are there, we are us, and you are you, so it’s not for nothing that they are now saying that the americans will take over supply weapons, which are also cut out by a trickle, everything that concerns the economy, money - this is... please, aleksan gelevich, your opinion, well , here i can say that the benefit is economic, but this is our enemy, he calls russia his enemy , he supports those who kill us, and excuse me, i’ll interrupt you, but at your meeting, i won’t name names, because i don’t know if it’s possible to name the names of those who spoke at the sections, but i’m not afraid to say that senior... meade representative named the united states precisely an enemy, yes, it is, if someone declares us an enemy and wages war on

us, killing our people, our children, our, our civilian population, well, considering him just a trading partner, in my opinion, is completely irrational , in this regard, the question is, that is, if the west, the usa, says that you are a friend to us, then we agreed that the enemy is the enemy, the enemy should supply during the war with him, what their economy depends on, right here, i’m not an economist, but it seems to me, from the point of view of patriotic consciousness, from the point of view from the point of view of geopolitics, there is some kind of misunderstanding here , for example, when we did not start the reich, before that we had very intensive economic cooperation, almost, despite the polarity of ideology, despite serious, serious fundamental

differences in all issues, we and the third reich more or less cooperated economically, but when the war began, if we had continued, for some economic reasons, for example, to supply the enemy with this or that type of fuel, this or that rare earth... but formally, at least at least, of course, the united states is not such an enemy for russia as hitler ’s germany was, well, you need to ask people, families who have lost their loved ones, we are not talking about our losses, but they also exist, these are losses , which are actually heartbreaking losses, very significant losses, and against this background , the country still won’t be satisfied with this money in any case until we establish our own sovereign economy. our own, we won’t defend our own sovereign industry, anyway we will never never become a full-fledged entity and the russian world that we are talking about, so this question, in my opinion

, is it worth continuing such an important strategic partnership in one of the areas of resources with our enemy, so i have no clarity, it seems to me that there is some kind of that is a contradiction, in this case i was not particularly convinced by the words for... the minister of foreign affairs, the first part was absolutely correct, and by the way, i think that there is no need to rush, he is also right to break off relations, this is exactly the question it is quite reasonable to save, because two nuclear powers must somehow have a channel for relationships, that’s what concerns supplies, i would simply cut them off and find other consumers, they also exist, as we also thought, that everything depends... on the west, if they impose sanctions on us in the end, it turned out that not at all, that we managed it surprisingly well, i think that in the field of other energy resources there are some

alternative steps, by the way, sergei rebkov spoke about the need to find the right balance, and i am sure that here's finding it balance, this is what is called a living process, where a lot is revised... and little can be considered fixed for a long period, we’ll go to advertising, and after that we’ll talk with academician naumkin about what’s happening between the israelis and i want to ask you , vitaly, what there is some glimpse of the path to peace, or the calm before the storm , we go to advertising, a good russian, this is a dead russian, this is nargiz zakirova, with whom we had the chance to talk, such an immodest question,

but how did you get to moscow in the first place? she fell for it and told a lot of interesting things, i was getting dirty there, i was there to the left, to the right of all these orcs, she always had russophobia , she just hid it, well, in short, they started to cover my oxygen, she tried to hype, she was hyped, so they banned her weight by 50 years, i think we need to ask you to get another 50 years , i’m going to get myself another tattoo, but if you get me, i ’ll give you ukrainian citizenship, on the forehead, on the forehead, come on, we’ve raised 7 million dollars for armament, financed by. .. the murder of russian soldiers, and america did not reward her in any way, didn’t give her citizenship, she’s not needed there, she’s needed here, so she can do dirty tricks here , organize dances in the streets, i had the idea to get rid of russian citizenship, ask for ukrainian, today we see the betrayal of our country, the vavan and lexus show, today on the first, he shuddered for a very long time, probably for three or four months, when the plane was flying, there were fireworks , our military gathered them in the basements, my adopted son was in the same group, belova made

a ukrainian child happy and at the same time became a victim of kiev propaganda . russia does not kidnap children from russia, she abducts children from nowhere at all, as well as the famous italian singer pupa. by allowing myself to sing in crimea, i automatically become a person of the nunat in ukraine. exclusively in our antifake studio. premiere, tomorrow on the first. one shell, fire, shot! modern combat is like a chess game. here you should never lose your mind, two tanks, five armored vehicles, and we have one there, alyosha, behind this forest stand there is a lie, our guys went to about that area, get out, get out, come on quickly, faster, faster, faster, hook it up, hook it up, we'll take the equipment now, restore it, rum, give me the installation, a little up, come on, more, more, more, more, just look at what a huge

unit, the heart of the tank, so guys, what? that's it, let's start it for testing, let's go, time has chosen us, it shouldn't be every man for himself here, here it's one for all, all for one, i'm stopping by, premiere, special report, the living heart of the tank, on sunday on the first. vitaly vyacheslavovich, thank you, first of all i would like to say that today is 29 november is the international day of solidarity with the palestinian people, it is celebrated within the un, and traditionally our public, we usually participate in some events that take place on this day, and i would like to remind

listeners that today this could not possibly be more relevant, well, as far as what is happening there today, yes , there are some changes in the situation, they are not yet clear to what and whether they can lead to something, because one way or another, uh, the flow of those being exchanged with one on the one hand, these are hostages held by hamas , on the other hand, there is a huge mass of palestinian prisoners, somewhere around 5-6,000 people, apparently, and one way or another it will end up with everyone probably being released. and now the question arises, what is going to be done next in this situation, if the palestinians agree to such an exchange, albeit not equivalent, but still the liberation of all, let all for all, well, what will israel do next, will it continue -will these barbaric bombings

continue to be reopened? front, so to speak, this is more than a front, these are massive attacks on the palestinians, with the killing of women, children, more than 400 children have already died there, or will it be some kind of attempt at some kind of transit to a longer truce, it’s hard to say, speech, because in fact our position was that we want a complete cessation of hostilities, but this does not work for either israel or the united states, and moreover, it seems that netanyahu is interested in continuing. most likely no one will demand an account from him

why he committed such things on the one hand cruelty, in the second phase after the invasion of partisans or hamas fighters into the territory, why did he allow this at all, on the other hand, shouldn’t we expect a stronger surge in this military activity between israel and the palestinians and palestine the palestinians, because there is a war going on after all, not only with hamas, but it is quite obvious that it will not be possible to destroy hamas, it is simply impossible, we have talked about this many times, well, that’s what the arab world will do next, because today the solution to the problem, in fact, largely lies in in the hands of regional powers, and not only arab countries, but also turkey, iran and global players, a lot depends on us, i think that russia is the best

candidate for mediation, uh, no one can handle this better than russia, and attempts the united states should monopolize the role of mediators and even take credit for these successes of this... temporary truce, i think that these are unconstructive attempts, attempts to also completely close the issue using the potential of the international quartet mediators, this is a bad step on the part of the americans. academician neumkin, who knows the region, israel, and gaza very well, said that he is a complete military man. victory over hamas is impossible, as i understand it, in israel they say that this is precisely their task, what are they based on, general, are these just words or do they have any specific plans? well, you know, i think that of course they have plans, even

if they didn’t have plans before, the general staff is still working with the beginning of the operation, of course, these plans are being drawn up, are corrected if there was something, but you know, i agree with vitaly vyacheslavovich that for netanyahu to get out of this conflict, just say, that’s it, let’s stop, this is his political death, he simply won’t sit still, no the fact that in his chair, he may not be able to sit in freedom, because there is a pretty decent trail of corruption behind him , everything else, plus, i think that he will also be asked why this attack was carried out on an impregnable wall , which they just bit there with scissors, this prickly they climbed over the fence and destroyed it there, killed a bunch of people, a whole large number of people, took hostages,

someone should answer for this too, but now, in my opinion , the goal is not to destroy hamas, but to destroy the military wing of hamas. destroy this system, or rather destroy the tunnel system, deprive this military wing of every material base that they have created in gas, but you understand, i want to repeat once again that conducting combat operations in a city in densely built-up conditions is one of the most difficult forms for any army, even such a professional and well-prepared israeli, but to conduct combat operations in ruins, because , well, even those pictures that show, there are complete ruins there, this is also , so to speak, makes this task an order of magnitude

more difficult, so how do they they will continue to solve these problems, this is a big one, yes, and of course, one cannot discount the fact that after all , the americans, judging by those reports, are beginning... to show more and more impatience in terms of some kind of completion of this operation, they are figuring out how would justify that israel won, but the americans are already beginning to suffer from this reputationally, i, but nevertheless, i do not foresee a quick end to this conflict, for purely subjective reasons, it seems to me that netanyahu will go to the end, and maybe a little. toss around four arab countries, but not to mention the fact that this is a complete violation of international

law, the forcible transfer of people to places where they are not really wanted, accepted, where, firstly, secondly, they themselves, i’m not sure, that everyone will want to go there to yemen or to iraq for where it’s also not easy to live there, and to live in tents, but in words, at least, the united states is against this idea of ​​resettlement, let’s listen to what the official... of the national security council in washington, admiral carby, just said. we have clearly outlined our position. we do not support the resettlement of palestinians outside of gaza. look, most of these people don't want to leave, this is their home. it is obvious that they were moved within the country to finally say goodbye to them, especially those from the north. therefore, as we have already said, we will not support operations in the south until the israelis prove that they have trained all the displaced people in the gaza strip. aleksanovich.

in my opinion, the right words are strong words, yes, well, i didn’t understand what’s behind them, what’s behind it, well , if you want, a warning to israel that if israel tries to resettle these people, then israel may lose american aid, or this is like another presentation of american preferences that israel can... listen to and then ignore. i think, of course, closer to the second, but the fact that such in general, reasonable things, and not allowing ethnic cleansing, this is a completely correct position, and in my opinion, it arose simply based on how the americans see how their middle eastern policy is simply collapsing, they measure the mood in general in the world, understand that to continue to unilaterally support israel despite... despite what he does , and he really, his projects, their

actions are very cruel, they are absolutely not commensurate with any rules, even those of the west installs, and in this situation, i think that this kind of statement that we have just heard is , in general, just some kind of necessity, in order to maintain at least some influence in the middle east in the islamic world, and... even wider in humanity, the americans are simply obliged to somehow restrain what is happening there, in general , to offer, even in words, this is the second question here, who will listen to it, is it israel or not, something tells me that they will not listen, that israel will continue, as you rightly noted, its own, its own line, general buzhinsky correctly said that this may be a political necessity within israel, but america has become. this situation and now they, on the one hand, are forced to support israel, on the other hand, they understand that if

they support it too much, too openly, then this could end badly, they will completely lose their influence in the islamic world, thank you, i have a question for you, several people asked me to ask you from another opera, what will happen to oil prices, will saudi arabia agree to continue limiting your products, as you yourself understand, this is a pressing issue, it also concerns inflation in russia and the situation with the ruble, your word. it seems to me that she will agree with this, although it is generally difficult to predict anything in the middle east, anything, but i think that the saudis will agree with this. everything i hear seems to be in this direction, although i know even less than you. it was a great game, we'll see you on

the air tomorrow. relocants are the name given to those who, after the start of a special military operation, left our country. they emphasize that this is a simple movement, not immigration, and has nothing to do with politics. this is a show at avan and lexus. and we have another exclusive for you, and we begin why the singer , whom fans idolized, became prohibited from entering our country for as long as 50 years, and what the participant in one of the most notorious scandals of modern russia is doing, about this in our issue. i will be pleased to introduce the guests who will discuss these topics with us today, today

we have journalist alena zhigalova with us, alena, hello, hello, grandmaster sergey koryakin, hello, hello, vitaly borodin is the head of... the federal project on security and the fight against corruption, by the way, these are exactly the guys who deal with foreign agents, that's right, everything is correct, good afternoon, and anton korobkov, earthly journalist, anton, hello, i will pray for you, so that you don’t forget the earthly path, i will pray for you, so that you return unharmed, she was born and raised in tashkinets, took part in the competition... musical talent 86, then moved live in the usa, but my career in the states did not work out. real fame and multimillion-dollar earnings in russia were brought to her by her collaboration with maxim fodiev, who wrote for her all the main hits that became popular. she gained numerous fans, and her songs became real hits. but at some point

everything changed. she is now banned from entering russia until 2072. this is nargiz zakirova. with whom we had a chance to communicate on behalf of the leadership of ukraine, which she often praised on her social networks, we called first from the former minister of culture of ukraine alexander tkachenko with such a welcoming offer and , accordingly, nargiz fell for it and told us a lot of interesting things, such an immodest question, but how did you end up in moscow? i read the biography in the thirteenth year already in america, they probably lived there ... then you experienced horror when you arrived after... that’s how it was, i was at my mother’s, and my mother’s tv was on at that time, and there was russian television, and i literally literally walked past the tv and there they talked about the project being a voice, i understand that this is a french voice of an american voice, so

i’m thinking, why shouldn’t i submit it here, that is , if at that moment i was passing through and i saw there, let’s put a voice there, i don’t know ukraine, i i would probably go there, the voice of africa is there, i would also go there, that is, it was a matter of chance , i came to moscow, although many people dissuaded me, they say: “what are you, what are you, it’s generally scary there when we we arrived, i lived in the city center, then we left moscow, we practically didn’t see people and i didn’t want to see people, and i can’t with these people, i have no contact, i developed there on this one.” just some kind of social phobia, yes yes, i stopped altogether, that is, i started having panic attacks when i was close to people came up to me, as i say, to the point that we always ordered groceries home, because we didn’t want to go beyond the fence, because i didn’t want to see anyone, firstly, and secondly, i feel at home here unprotected,

she still speaks here in relation to russia, and by the way, we’ll ask you to add another 50 years so that he doesn’t see moscow anymore, notice how well she speaks her native russian language, allena, and you talked to her, interviewed her, of course, i talked to nargiz when she just appeared in show business in general , she finished participating in her show voice, she went to all the festivals on tour, we ran into her, oh, how she hugged me there, greeted me that here is alena, hello, and i she did not have social phobia at that moment; in 2013 she became the second show was a voice, then there was another one... and she signed a contract with maxim fodeev. maxim fodeev was also mentioned in our conversation with her. let's watch the excerpt. he continues to terrorize you, takes revenge, persecutes you, takes revenge very much , to the point that he, for example, we are now planning a very, well, such a busy tour of

europe, he just lives on my social networks, and he gets to the point that he calls to every country, to every city, he sends letters there, some, now switzerland, for example, has fallen apart, and now i’m very angry at switzerland, of course, well, well, at least they paid you money, this fodeev didn’t deceive you in this regard, he deceived you very much, and i ’ll tell you even more, for a very large amount of money, they just didn’t pay me my fee, for example , even this song , which is in the movie crimea, he didn’t ask me anything, yeah, well, well, i hope you understand that after all, you... not like in russia, i understand that very much, and i also understood it at home, because i have a huge number of friends, and friends of my parents, they are ukrainians, namely, not just from ukraine, but they are ukrainians, well, alen, you say that you knew each other before that, yes, that is, you

communicated, so she was always there before she came to fadiev, even before she communicated, then she ended up with maxim fadiev, i think that no one... will be with the fact that she became a star thanks to the songs of maxim fadiev, then at least everyone would know what songs she had before, what she sang in restaurants, covered, karaoke, no one knows, then she i hit him and became a star. why is she talking so beautifully about fodeev karabas-barabas robbed everything, didn’t pay, and why doesn’t she want to show the tattoo with maxim fadiyev, which she got a tattoo from such a terrible producer who oppressed her, she was in love with him, she generally pursued him, she dreamed of meeting him, by the way, not only she wrote to him, she also wrote to kirkorov, yes, she was looking for some kind of collaboration, obviously with some cool star, so that she really wanted. the second one was still with philip, then lyuba uspenskaya helped her, they also said to each other there, you are my friend, little blood,

everything to you, and what we see now, now they are cursing each other , and that she has such a character, why couldn’t she work well with anyone, well, such a fine mental organization, maxim fodeev, thanks to whom she essentially became famous , he’s in touch now, maxim, hello, hello everyone, glad to see everyone. hello guys, how could you characterize nargiz from a professional point of view, but from a human point of view, well, as a person, i wouldn’t leave this definition at all, it’s something else, it’s some kind of another species or subspecies even, but this is definitely not a person, if we are talking about personality, of course , there is no personality, and this personality cannot exist, because this person survived three drug-induced comas, that is, this is a fact, it is not hidden no one, she herself told, so to speak, publicly, yes, that she worked - in a morgue, for almost 5 years, painted corpses,

as for her professional qualities, and she is a professional singer, period, there are many of them in restaurants, in karaoke, what did she have a relationship with russia then? she always doesn't she loved russia, no, in fact, she doesn’t love everything, everyone, all countries, except for america at that. this is her home, this is hers, this is everything she loves there, this is everything else, it’s like this, this is actually her main position, in our conversation she states that you disrupted her concerts in europe, is that true? i disrupted her concerts, karaoke concerts or some kind of concerts, or concerts with stolen music from us, we have - confirmation of all this that her friend there, so to speak, who worked, everything from us... pulled it out of the computer, that is, all the photo shoots, all the videos that we worked on, everything, that is, all the work that we

did, they stole her, and i disrupted her concert, isn’t this absurd? who was the initiator of the break in cooperation between you? i initiated the breakup because it was impossible, negative, terrible, constant scandals, i don’t want, i want. she has been pursuing me since the nineties, this person is mentally ill, she suffers from erotomania, so she says everywhere that i am in love with her, that i am pursuing her, that i am living her life, you see, all these words, it’s exactly the opposite, i don’t even remember this person at all, i remember her only when they bring me some nasty things that she says, energiz used to love russia, he constantly stated this there money, spoke in the kremlin, let's see what she said a few years ago, i never said that i hate russia, that's a lie, how can this not be home if i've been living here