they finally found him, guys, it’s time, don’t rush. the cross, the cross of polotsk, must be dug up and taken out, we are delaying, this is it.

hey, you, box in the car, quickly move into the car, box, and are you in your place, i said , do you think we have a chance to survive, take your place, i say,

dank, thank you.

anton, anton.

what about the igorka? alive, slightly scratched, taken to the hospital. well, did the box drown? it’s okay, we’ll get it, i doubt it, there are bottomless swamps here, for me or? to know it was him, i immediately thought it was him.

krestuton, sergey sergeevich, no, ralph, he remained in the belarusian land, as he was destined to do. this means that everything will be fine with this region, we are all attracted by hypnosis,

the sound of wheels, passages, paths, trains, the earth floats away like glass, stretches into the distance like a film strip. and let someone insist that our path is predetermined, so that no one abandons the rut, we should not obediently go through life, to the places indicated by someone, we should not obediently go through life, to the places indicated by someone. artifact. so you, who have been through the war, don’t bother, boots are knocking on the python, again false true, true lies, a special

analytical edition of the big game is on air, our first conversation will be with kiril vladimirovich babaev. director of the institute of china from modern asia of the russian academy of sciences, but i know from my experience of talking with you that in addition to your expertise on china, you have a good idea.

to say that they understood something from the example of ukraine, that they learned something from the case of ukraine, which gives reason to think that the collective west will be less fixated on hegemony and will be ready to show more flexibility in negotiations with russia and china. yes, this is a very good question, but i agree with you here, moreover, i am rather fully confident that this will not happen. hegemony. this is a benefit that is very rarely given up, at least voluntarily

without conflict, we know that those countries that once seized world leadership or tried to seize it never gave it up without a fight, this also applied to napoleon and hitler, there are other examples, from my point of view, today the united states is not ready in any form make compromises with the world majority, are not ready to even understand that -

this is what kisinger said in recent years, that the west, specifically the united states, can maintain a leading position in the world, but for this - kisinger said, you need to humble your pride, reduce your ambitions, that in order to be a leader, you need to understand that a leader is not a hegemon, that a leader must have...

you know, there are enough sensible minds who say that the united states is going in the wrong direction, and that leadership is really not missiles and not aggression against sovereign states, this is, first of all, leadership in the minds, this is a kind of moral, intellectual leadership, which the united states has lost today, thanks to its foreign policy, but nevertheless we hear this mainly from the lips of those who are former, former secretary of state kissinger, former senators, former executives.

united states for elections. unfortunately, therefore, they have limited opportunities for free expression of thought, unlike citizens of many other countries, including ours.

let's listen to how cia director willim burns explains the dynamics in us-china relations, this is from his recent foreign affairs article. for sidin ping, a man who tends to view the united states as a fading superpower, american leadership in ukraine certainly came as a surprise: the united states' willingness to use economic leverage to successfully resist pressure, washington's ability to hold its allies together. to counter putin's aggression have shaken beijing's belief that america is on the verge of collapse. the strong us alliances in the indo-pacific region, off the chinese coast, have had a sobering effect on beijing. one of the most reliable ways to make america look helpless in the eyes of the prc is to provoke chinese aggression, refuse to support ukraine, further material assistance to kiev

will not be carried out to the detriment of taiwan, it will clearly demonstrate the determination to help taiwan. very interesting text. diplomacy has worked for centuries, you're looking at another great power, especially in this case we are talking about china , a nuclear power, and you are thinking how not to bring things to confrontation and how important it is that they understand that they can deal with you, yes, you

are strong, you are powerful, you have the largest, if we talk... not about the number of people, but about the military capabilities of the army in the world, but nevertheless, i would say, you are showing yourself as a serious potential negotiating partner, that is, you have shown that in the case of ukraine, you understand russian concerns , you have proven that you do not strive for hegemony, that some even the most complex issues that... can be discussed rationally, compromises can be sought, and it seems to me that one could say that this approach of the united states could show china that an agreement can be reached with america regarding taiwan, but no, the prospect is voiced by mr. burns, that we will actually intimidate china, we

will show them who is the master of the world, i am not sure that this is the most effective way. to unite russia and china so much that they began to act as virtually a single alliance today in the international arena. all

this is a consequence of that very one-sided, american-centric view of the world, which... the financial system, of course, we are seeing this also because the united states stubbornly does not want to enter into dialogue with the world community, they have concentrated on...

as the american describes approach to containing china, national security advisor to president biden, we have already taken a series of calibrated measures to contain china technologically, and will continue to do so in accordance with our core principle, we are going to adapt them to target them so that they are aimed at our national security, more broadly, to prevent the destruction of technological and economic ecosystems for us on... and he goes on to explain how china is responding to this. let's listen. we see

china working to make the world more dependent on itself while reducing its dependence on the rest of the world. we have seen china take steps to adapt the international system to its own system with its own preferences. for years, economists have been predicting that china would overtake the us in terms of gdp either this decade or next: now those predictions are being pushed back, and with china facing its own problems, some say that may never happen, so the most important thing: at the moment, america is once again demonstrating its ability to be resilient and re-evaluate, that is, the main idea is that the chinese economic miracle is in the past, that china understands that their options are more limited.

to the domestic audience, when sullivan says that everything is fine with us, it will only get better, but you see, they said that the chinese economic miracle has exhausted itself for the last 20 years, for the last 20 years the cover of the economist magazine has written the end growth of the chinese economy, this is not true, of course, the chinese economy continues to develop, moreover, china's economic and trade influence in the world continues to expand, and so does its use. as a reserve currency in the world, we know this, and of course, these are the very signals that indicate that the united states is completely unable to contain china, the question is that china

is never really against reaching an agreement with the united states, the chinese leadership has repeatedly made signals that that they are ready to negotiate, establish some kind of compromise, even enter into a mega-deal with the united states, primarily on global trade, but the united states is not ready.

russia to submit to his will, because he managed to napoleon to capture most of european continent. i don’t have to tell you that the reaction in st. petersburg was exactly the opposite, that it is most likely impossible to come to an agreement with this person, and to submit to him, establish, or at least cooperate with the french blockade. that this is more valuable to himself, well, hitler also knows that he managed to intimidate many, but not all,

and like you... i see these historical parallels all the time, i am convinced that it is generally strange to me that someone can not see across the ocean. today, of course, it is clear that we are entering approximately the same situation in which the world was before the second world war or during the napoleonic wars, before the collapse of napoleon's empire, because we see a power that believes that its point of view is not negotiable, that no

compromises ... are needed , you see, after all, america was strong in what way, it was strong there back in the nineties, in the 2000s, with its certain provision of benefits for all humanity, such as free trade, the rule of law, the western system of values, today, these all values ​​are no longer there, there is no freedom, tolerance, so to speak, has destroyed freedom, we know in western society, there is no free trade, because tens of thousands of sanctions against various countries have killed this free trade. and globalization, accordingly, ceases to exist , there is no longer the rule of law, because in western countries, at the will of governments , absolutely illegal decisions are made regarding pro-russian assets, all this, of course, indicates that global leadership is being lost, and here you cannot use force help you restore it or keep it, force here can only hurt, this is exactly what you are talking about and what is happening now, in the late sixties...

but this is an example of outright blackmail, i don’t know, i think that’s why about the example of leonid lichabrezhny in budapest and bratislava, respectively, the capitals of hungary and slovakia, it’s hard for me not to think that such an appeal could be successful today, but it undermines the unity and leadership of the european

union.

but it's the same story, it's clear what it is everything is dictated from overseas, it is clear that all this is the policy of the united states of america, but it also leads to the collapse of what, from my point of view, is successful. once a european project, because this very issue could collapse the european union very soon, well, this kind of blackmail, it is incompatible with the demands of the collective west, to recognize its moral superiority with any talk about democracy, but when it comes to moral superiority, they can test it very easily in washington for any reason in any situation, in particular. they have a feeling that they are on the side of peace and progress, when they demand from china that china reduce its cooperation with russia, they have a feeling in the american capital that this is pressure, that it brings

certain results, such as, for example, chinese banks have allegedly become think more about cooperation with russian banks, providing loans to russia, firstly, how fair is this, and secondly, how far can such success, if there is american pressure on china, go? the success of american pressure is now visible very clearly, it is visible primarily in the queue of countries that has lined up to form the brix dodge. once upon a time it was an association of five countries, now there are already dozens, several dozen countries of the developing world. would like to begin cooperation with brix in one form or another, it seems to me that this is the best signal that the west’s policy in this sense has failed, the west has just lost the very moral and leadership in the minds of developing countries that it still possessed

several decades ago, and of course here - it is necessary to say that cooperation between russia and the countries of the global south will only develop in this context, because both russia and those countries with which... today we cooperate in asia, in africa, latin america, they understand well that it is necessary to no longer put their eggs in one basket, the basket of the united states of america, but it is necessary to diversify their foreign policy, foreign economic activity and build it as much as possible with such countries like russia, china, india, other regional leaders, brix, shanghai cooperation organization. we see this, this cooperation is developing very actively, and i believe that this is also to some extent. a consequence of the short-sighted foreign policy of the united states? i completely agree with you that this is exactly the case in general, but nevertheless, specifically, regarding chinese banks, regarding their readiness

to provide russia with some technologies that are considered dual- use in washington, and that they allegedly can be used for military purposes, this is american pressure on china. did it bring any results in these specific cases? no , definitely not, today cooperation in the financial sector between russia and china is developing very actively, our banks have actively begun their journey to the chinese market, and chinese banks are very actively cooperating with our companies, and moreover, even regional chinese banks are more active, than large state-owned banking companies in china, we see this, in addition to... i head there is also a national coordination center , which was recently created by decision of the russian government, and it is there that we deal with the interaction between russian large corporations and their partners in the eastern markets, and so we see how

financial cooperation, which was back in twenty-two, is very very cautious, because the chinese did not understand if they should be afraid of the united states, secondary sanctions and so on, today it is developing with much greater intensity and of course... well, this also shows the political will from on the part of the prc leadership, but this also shows a strategic desire to gradually move away from the connection with the west and to switch to the connection with the world majority, one of the leaders of which is, of course, russia. well, to support what you just said, let's listen to what the chinese minister of defense just recently said about how beijing is responding to american pressure? in recent years, the united states and the western world have been isolating russia. we understand everything and strongly support justice by providing support on the ukrainian issue. although the us and europe continue to put pressure on the chinese side, defense cooperation between china and the european union

has taken a hit, but we will not change or abandon established policies because of this. they will not be able to interfere with normal chinese-russian cooperation. how does this cooperation manifest itself? here are some of the main areas of the final goal. well, first of all, this is, of course, military-technical cooperation, which is traditionally at a high level, but today there are a number of new areas in which ours are cooperating. this is holding joint maneuvers, joint exercises, here we are only expanding cooperation with china every year, and it is clear how much this is in the interests of both russia and china, and overall security in the eurasian region. and of course, china is a sovereign country. and of course, china has its own interests, and

of course, no one says that we already have a full-fledged military alliance, by the way, both sides say that they do not strive for it, but with all these reservations, can we say that russian leadership believes that cooperation with china, despite american pressure, is very, very successful, of course, we see this from... the intensity of contacts at all levels between the leadership of our countries, we know that our leaders have already met more than 40 times during their stay in power, very active contacts at the level of military departments, at the level of foreign policy departments, well, this year, as we know, we have 75 years of establishing diplomatic relations, this is a very special year in the history of russian-chinese cooperation, so i am convinced that this cooperation will strengthen at all levels, thank you very much, this was a very interesting and useful conversation, and we hope

to see you again on our air in the very near future. thank you. this is a big game, we'll be back on air in just a few minutes. the ukrainians claim that they are the ones who opened the so-called kondratyuk route. any literature , including western literature, indicates that this is a great soviet scientist, thanks to whom the americans ended up on the moon. including. v in current rockets, the proton is part of his invention, the anti-system that ukraine has been turned into cannot create anything, the video of a tank battle that the fake makers tried to pass off as their successes, the person who is filming, he stands so calmly in general, absolutely such training ground conditions, chicks bit themselves by the tail, what truth is hidden behind the popular anti-fake picture on the internet, premiere, tomorrow on the first. the muslim world took the place of the roman world and

byzantium, developed the received heritage further, and then through spain, italy transferred to europe, what is algebra, from the arabic word aljabr, multiplication, achemy, alkymia, even alcohol, alcohol is translated as a decrepit person, what makes a person decrepit. until 1917, the personal guard of the persian shah consisted of russian cossacks. the shah of persia is the most precious thing he has, that is, himself. under historical eras, this is the real face of islam, the premiere of civilization, the third film, the islamic world, the next four on the first. there's a big game on the air. now we

will talk with the outstanding israeli political scientist and public figure yakov kedmi. yakov, we welcome you, thank you very much for taking the time. good evening, everyone, greetings, you and the audience. yakov , to the natural question, where from your point of view are we all in relation to the conflict around gaza, a variety of assessments are given, including in israel, do you think we are moving in the direction of political regulation, or are there still opportunities further escalation, or could there be something in between these two extremes? yes. escalation unlikely because the escalation from a purely military

point of view is already ending with the operation in hanyonis, the city is completely surrounded, after that the question will remain of what to do or something to do or not to do with rofeh with the philadelphia corridor, and the tank divisions have been withdrawn from the gas sector, only infantry units, which and special forces, which are engaged in clearing and destroying hamas fighters either in tunnels or on the surface, that is, more of this in the gaza strip.

egypt, egyptian military intelligence and the head of kator. and there it was formed. a proposal , the meaning of which is that within a month and a half there will be a ceasefire , all hostages will be exchanged in three stages, first women and the elderly and sick and at the end prisoners of war, both living and dead, in total, according to our data, there are 136 hostages, but of them more...

there are two problems here, one problem is an internal israeli one, the netanyahu government, if he agrees to solve the problem with the presence in the gas sector and representatives of the palestinian authority, he will not have a government, the government will collapse, and he

he understands this very well, and this is a serious problem on his part, on the other hand, if netanyahu. will somehow meet the demands of hamas, he will also not have a government, because all the right-wing religious parties will leave him, if he does not agree to the hostage agreement, even if there is a truce and ceasefire for a month and a half, then he risks the fact that his government will leave the center and left parties, that is , for him... for all parties, his way out is very difficult, and this does not bode well for him in terms of solving the problem, as i have already he said that it is in the same place, in the same place, the palestinian authority

agrees to come and take control of the gas sector, but they first require strengthening. egypt, the united states and the european community say the same thing. so far, only netanyahu, although the majority, objects to this.

restrictions on the powers of mahmoud abaz, to which he does not agree. on the other hand, fatah, which is the main force in organizing the liberation of palestine, they say: we are against hamas participating in government of technocrats, as proposed by egypt and saudi arabia, in gaza at the end of the war. we agree for hamas to join.

there is a yarmulka on his head, he stands, speaks in front of the religious, and for this he put on this yarmalka, he never walks, he is not religious, kosher food for him is all sea crap and a little pork, so no one is serious about the fact that he said, does not apply, he has neither the strength nor the ability to implement what he said. the minister of defense has given his proposals, and these proposals will be discussed. whether he is or not, and it says clearly, the israeli army will not remain in the gaza strip, the gaza strip will

be controlled by the palestinians themselves, as they decide, and israel will not allow hamas to participate in power in gaza in one form or another, that’s all, this is really what they say politics, you can listen to this, but netanyahu has none.

who will take care of supplies, power, health care, electricity? that is, if we don’t put some kind of power there, hamas will infiltrate and do this again, then they tell him: if you allow this, this means that all the sacrifices that were made during this war, during these battles, were in vain, you will nullify all the achievements that we achieved against hamas and thereby bring it back. so this is exactly the situation , it will be resolved over the next few weeks. yakov, the last question

i want to ask you is...

in a word, the solution to the problem of the gaza strip is the return to the rule of the palestinian authority , the beginning of the process of creating a palestinian state, the authorities of the united states are talking about this, the whole world is talking about this the arab world, the entire muslim world is talking about this, the whole of europe supports this and, as far as i can understand, russia

also adheres to the same point of view, that only such a process,

who suffers there, you shared a piece of bread, that’s what he will ask, gratitude to you for your ebb, as a result of which you received an injury, i wish you god’s help, strength, strength, mental, physical, but also a speedy recovery, i see a lot, a lot , i feel a lot, this is the signal that i receive from the outside, to me helps a lot in life. to fifteen years of patriarchal service, the premiere of the documentary film, today on the first, we spent one and a half acres in the cold, millions of dollars on board, two dead and four survivors, lucky, they should all have died, in theory. the story of the crash of a private plane carrying out medical flights that crashed in the snow-capped

mountains of afghanistan is full of rumors, secrets and is worthy of becoming the basis for a detective film scene. a businessman from volgodonsk saved his seriously ill wife, they loved each other and died at the same time day. our main task was to provide assistance and bring, preferably cure, it did not work out through no fault of ours; the pilots and doctors who transported a woman and her husband who fell ill at the resort from thailand to moscow, themselves found themselves on the brink of life or death. initially, it was necessary to escape, how many hours left the plane, about 4-5 hours in the snow. our exclusive today is a lifelong air drama. what happened? plane, you were unconscious, i no longer asked for my son to stay alive, he saved four souls, he already hero, he is a private pilot, not a professional, you tell me what the mistake is, there is no piloting error here, your son had no right to fly this plane, everything, exclusive with dmitry borisov, premiere on saturday on the first. there's a big game on the air, we continue

our conversation about the situation around gaza, now with me in the studio is taria kalyan, a journalist from ria novosti. against hamas militants or against hamas, but in fact, what we see, the whole world, what it sees is that attacks continue on people, on residential buildings, on cars, on groups of people,

which they are not guilty of anything, mostly the victims of this military operation are only civilians, so far today more than 27 dead, more... as you know, israel says that civilians are not targets, that when civilians die residents, this is because either they

are not so peaceful, but were somehow connected with hamas, sometimes they were simply members of the militant wing of hamas, or at least they were in those places where israel had reason to believe that there were laws there.. .the whole world says this is international organizations that work, they talk about this, that it is mainly civilians who suffer, and mainly old people, women and children, and where are

these people, how can they hit hamas militants, this is, well, you know the accusation that, for example, in a hospital in gaza, in a very famous hospital, the israelis were accused of... hamasa and that these were the militants there, why weren’t they hamas militants in this hospital, is that so? this is not true, of course, because where was it shown? they arrested the directors of the hospital, they arrested the doctors, they arrested nurses, and showed them what it was, it was supposedly an action movie. hamas, well, they just killed people, killed the wounded who were in the hospital, arrested the medical workers, that’s what it is, i remember that yahud barak, the former prime minister of israel, said that these tunnels, which

are located under the elshef hospital, are in the center of gaza city, this is the largest hospital complex in gaza, the israeli army, when they were in gaza, they built them, there are none, no one has discovered, there are no... such tunnels under hospitals, and no one has found them discovered, and no one could prove that these tunnels were used in military operations, you were in gas for a long time, and did you have any information about the presence of such tunnels? there wasn’t, of course, well , this is a hospital, here it is, i see that there are stairs, they just go to the hip down to the hospitals, in fact, what kind of one is this? who doesn’t know, in fact it was just used in the hospital as warehouses, they were used as a warehouse, there were no weapons, no militants, no hamas leaders, there was nothing it was discovered who controls gaza

now, still controls gaza, the power that was, the power that was in gaza, like this after the withdrawal of israeli troops from gaza, there uh... regional municipalities they work in the hospital, those are the personnel that worked before, there are all the organizations that worked before, they work partially. a lot in the press, on tv, but in reality they don’t do anything, they just troops come in, kill, shoot, bomb, then leave tactically, everything leaves, and there are no israeli authorities there, you know, for sure, that there is now a serious scandal with...

the united nations near east agency, an agency for helping palestinian refugees , and accusations are being made that this agency somehow collaborated with hamas, and that some employees of this agency even allegedly participated in the military operation against israel on october 7, what do you know about it? i can say about this that israel has always been against it. this is an organization of the nation that works in the gas sector, always, not only today, not only the last incident, they were always opposed to them, they always wanted to end their work in the gas sector, and what they say, they blame the fact that they found 12 people out of 12 extortion officials who participated in the october 7 event, well, maybe, maybe be it... 12 people participated, nine of them

, in my opinion, have already quit their jobs, were expelled, three died, as they say in the press, but that’s 12 people out of 13,000, popor provides assistance to the palestinians, provides assistance to 1,700,000 people to the palestinians in the sector gas, more provides assistance to the palestinians who are in jordan, in syria, the movement, but just an excuse, found excuses to put pressure on the pope. to stop their work in the gas sector, well, the united states , as you probably know, has already suspended funding for this agency, and we are talking about the fact that several other western countries can do this, my question naturally arises: what will be the result? someone else, some international agencies, some arab countries, maybe israel itself, do you know about some plans?

residents of the gaza strip from their homes towards egypt, what is the attitude of the population today? gases, most of the population are gases, in order to completely get rid of hamas? well, i’m not an election that can talk about what to get rid of or not to get rid of, but hamas, we need to know that hamas at least agreed with it in politics or, no, hamas is part of, part of the palestinian people, they elected in 2006, won the elections, they now, how to get rid of, get rid of, it will be new elections, like...

an official position and the chairman of organization for the liberation of palestine , well, of course, there are people who are against his policies, say, or do not agree with his policies, there are people who support him, there is a party, the fatih

party, this is the largest party, this is the historical party in palestine, they supports mahmoud abbas, well, i’m trying to understand, if not mahmoud abbas, then... the day after the war, in order to manage the gas sector, they must, as part of the political process, which will go through the restructuring of the gas sector and send trucks and humanitarian aid to the sector gas, and

of course, the political process that leads to the principle of two states, if this happens, then autonomy will participate, the throne of israel, on the other hand, they seem to be talking about a diplomatic settlement. well, look, the united states, this is the west, this is imperialism, i think that israel was a project, it is a project of imperialism, which created it. if the united states

really wants to create palestinian states to resolve this issue, it can put pressure on israel, and... this issue can be stopped , but in fact, what is happening now is that the presidents of america just decide to come out in speeches, they say, in fact, they are not putting any pressure on israel to resolve this issue, the road, it is narrow, you can just put it, just return to negotiations that lead to the creation of two states, a two-state solution, then everything will go fine, this is necessary.