complaining, looking, thank you, thank you, thank you, good luck.

i'm sorry, natasha, that it all turned out this way. i called a taxi. sorry, i'll go home. what about our night without a loaf? are you still joking? some crazy person just nearly killed you with an axe. well, it was just a hammer. what if it was just a hammer that hit me? i'm sorry, it's just that if this is normal for you, then it's not for me, you're a good guy, but i think it's unlikely that anything will work out for us, i understand, bye, bye.

quiet, quiet, police, knife on the ground, knife on the ground, knife on the ground, i said i will shoot, stand, there’s a big game on the air, today the russian minister of defense, general shagu , met with the leadership of the russian armed forces and said:

now he’s talking about this when he urgently demands western military assistance, weapons, ammunition and so on. i think that these military successes of russia largely explain what ukraine is doing now, subjecting russia to a series of terrorist attacks, a series of attacks deep into russia that make no sense from a military point of view, but...

to inflict a strategic defeat on russia, and however, it is increasingly mentioned that strategic defeat must involve more than just change. this is such an interesting situation, the response of the russian leadership on this matter is clear and unambiguous, let's listen to what president putin said about this today when meeting with the board of the ministry of internal affairs. oddly enough, someone wants revenge for failures in the fight against russia back in history.

this has not been possible, this will not happen and no one will be able to do this, this is an obvious, absolutely precise thing. it seems to me that something, oh what vladimir putin said, this is the main danger for russia today, that

in the west there are more and more influential people who think that they can talk to russia in the language of force, that. russia will respond to western attacks in a restrained, balanced, thoughtful, symmetrical manner, and in other words, it is they in the collective west who will sit and determine what level of risk they can afford, well, one gets the impression that, in general, they will do anything.

ukrainians may well be capable of this, because their aviation industry was very impressive, they later lost it in many ways, but there are personnel, there are traditions and so on, but the fact is that you can produce a long-range drone yourself, but what will you do with this drone if this drone needs to fly a long distance,

said a source close to the ukrainian drone program. accuracy in conditions of interference is ensured through the use of artificial intelligence. each aircraft is equipped with a terminal with satellite data about terrain. flights are worked out in advance with our allies, aircraft follow a flight plan, which allows us to strike targets with an accuracy of up to a meter. that is, in other words, without the united states, these ukrainian strikes would have been impossible. well when we talk.

to say that after this washington and london are not responsible for ukrainian terrorist actions, well, let’s put it this way. be further, but general shaigu spoke today

about how much the russian units have advanced since the beginning of the year, and they have advanced significantly, and at the same time the ukrainians were paying ukrainian armed forces paid a very, very large price for their not the most effective resistance, but nevertheless , we cannot have, as it seems to me, today i am sure... first deputy chairman of the cis committee, well, you are in the duma, perhaps , the most

authoritative expert on ukraine, what can we do, i hope that the duma also thinks so, i want this, excuse me, i’ll make a reservation, yes, i understand that a lot of things can be done, i mean, what can be done with your points to be made so that on the one hand it is decisive, on the other hand it is reasonable and responsible, well, first of all, i would like to say that war does not have a woman’s face - this is the title of one writer who is not very popular among us now, however, the title itself corresponds to reality, and of course, troubles, losses on our part, they accompany these military operations, as for today's information, the events associated with the attack on...

it is indeed obvious, because without this western technology, the space capabilities of the west, all this would not have achieved such a goal. what should be done about this? you they correctly said that after all, the fate of military operations is collapsing, it is not decided in drone attacks over even such long distances, they are intended mainly to provoke discontent within russia itself, like... endless attacks on the belgorod region or some of our other territories here within the borders of the russian

federation, in order to provoke a reaction from the population, they still dream that the population must sooner or later present a bill to the russian authorities on this matter. in fact, our population is not so driven, not so stupid, of course, it understands that ukraine and its allies bear responsibility for all this, this is an obvious fact, what needs to be done, as it seems to me, in diplomatic terms, is to achieve. condemnation throughout the world of ukraine as a terrorist state, because the methods with which it wages this struggle are terrorist, it is no coincidence that they are terrorist precisely because ukraine is losing in the struggle. the west, which today is tightening its position in a number of areas, the official west, is doing this forcedly, because only in this way

can he push ukraine, and most importantly the population of ukraine, to continue the resistance from which they have already given up.

formerly in his entourage, such as the former commander of the armed forces of ukraine zaluzhny, that is, in this situation, in this situation, firstly, it seems to me, we must continue our military efforts, and secondly, continue our diplomatic and other efforts , finally, thirdly, we must work more actively with the population of ukraine in all directions, with the population of ukraine that is today under control of zelensky, find ways, they arise, sites appear, so...

i would add, after talking with the russian military, serious and in many ways already successful efforts to create appropriate defense systems and systems that will allow them to be neutralized, but i just want to say, that this is an eternal story, the struggle between a shield and a ball, at some stage the shield is stronger and it reflects attacks, then the sword improves, it overcomes this, this is an eternal story in history, and this is being done and then... ukraine is succeeding today , absolutely not means that it will work tomorrow and even more so the day after tomorrow. however, i would like to talk about one more possibility. today, president putin very clearly said that russia’s weakness and indecisiveness

should not be counted on by opponents. president putin also said, just the other day:

you are now not only deputy chairman, first deputy chairman of the committee on international affairs of the federation council, you are one of the highest-ranking experienced russian diplomats, you were just in beijing, where you served as ambassador for 10 years, i am mistaken that there may be some specific russian actions that we will not try to discuss and list now, but that there may be some... specific russian actions that could reinforce the effectiveness of russian diplomacy , showing washington and london that they are indeed playing with

fire. well, you know, in 2 years of war, now we already call it a war, and a war between russia and nato, we have learned a lot, well , first of all, of course, our armed forces, but also diplomacy. you also have it, well, one way or another i definitely have it, one way or another it is already impossible to move away from it, you know, i know

the united states quite well, including the psychology of the elites in washington, i must admit that i have not been to washington since the end of october '22, and some things have changed there too, but i saw with my own eyes... the west do what it pleases, without a painful russian response, that it has become, well, part of, if you want, uh, mental

code, the prevailing part of the western elites, according to at least in washington and london, it seems to me that there is a very great danger in this, and i may sound like a hawk now, in fact i am not talking about war,

but they increasingly convinced themselves that we, on you can ignore us , this is where the discrepancy occurs: scissors: we’re leaving for advertising, when we return, we’ll talk with the philosopher and outstanding geopolitical theorist alexander dogin. let's go to advertising, perfect. someone commits an official crime, leaks information about their work, still no leads, but car? talk less and listen more, you

are not a suspect in the frame. roman is sure that at one time the entire inheritance unfairly went to sister christina, if i wanted to cheat, i would have come from the very beginning, documented everything myself, why is the singer’s son sure that the star’s widow is deceiving him, and the document could have been forged, i want find out the truth, you know your dad’s handwriting, i’ll be honest, no, but you got divorced on target, it turned out that the court broke us up, just imagine, 26 years later it was such a blow for me, an exclusive with dmitry borisov,

premiere in... oh, if you want, about how modern international relations work after the cold war, well, you know what terrorism is tragically from your own experience, and you are one of the few, now in moscow, who maintain contacts with western political scientists, journalists, maybe not the most influential today, but i would

say so, quite serious,

the most extreme case, the situation for us is very difficult when we can resort to this, because we need to answer, answer confidently, answer painfully, and at the same time, i do not rule out that we simply do not have such a technical capability, that is , what we are saying is indecision, an inclination towards peaceful negotiations, i don’t know this, this is generally a military secret, you would know if you didn’t say it, but i admit , what can i

definitely not say about hitting... because we still have a territory of war and a territory of peace, but there should be a territory of war and a territory of the rear, this is this gap between the peaceful area and the territory of the rear, it is constantly attacked by terrorist attacks, infiltration by the enemy, that is, us in general, the enemy forces you to quickly come to your senses and begin to draw out this potential, mobilize society, i’m not talking about mobilizing the army, but of course for

an effective offensive, if... we’re talking about kiev, kharkov, odessa, well, really , we still need to seriously, about even the minister of defense said this, a couple more armies, armies, a couple of armies, this one is probably running its course... but we need to strengthen significantly, in order to significantly strengthen, we need to significantly strengthen not only in relation to the military side, but also industrial, economic, psychological, cultural, we need to transfer society to a new regime, this regime can give its decisive results, or it can simply serve as the most important side, the basis for the next stage, but we need to move on to the next stage, that’s what mr. zatulin said, really. since march 31, that is, literally 2 days ago, ukraine has ceased to be a legitimate state, any state must confirm what is democratic, in a democratic way, what is undemocratic in an undemocratic way, but confirm its legitimacy and its legality. ukraine

does not have this now, the formal last term of zelensky’s presidency will soon end, and we will be dealing with an undefined terrorist entity, we have such a policy vacuum. this is not only not only an opportunity, but a threat, a non-existent ukraine, in fact, can become, we can say, now we will come here, but nato can also be said, that’s it, there is no state there, we just come here, we restore there peace zone, that is, we now need to speed up, in my opinion look, we held our brilliant elections, we really are doing very well, everything is fine with us, but we really need to speed up our internal reforms, and also, if we talk about western contacts, then...

the guidelines and horizons of our foreign policy are there friends of russia, or at least neutral forces, there are a lot of them, who, just like us , are not dissatisfied with the liberal globalist elites who have been held hostage by them, we need to turn to them, here it seems to me that this potential is new proactive, not just reactive, not only formal, but deep diplomacy, mobilization of society, mobilization of culture, we need to transform society. in a state of mobilization, we need to use new tools that we have not used before for various reasons, and of course, think something with a technological leap, because this is also the correct metaphor of shield and sword, in order to resist

the american enemy, we need to move exponentially in this area, not only by import substituting parts that we did not have, but by making breakthrough discoveries, therefore, the new technical innovation bureaus must... work in four shifts simply from morning until evening, the rest of society must switch to victory mode, we have no hope for peace, for a return to what was before twenty to twenty-two, we have only hope for victory, victory is not peace, it is completely different, victory will make our society different, victory will make the world, world architecture different, in this regard it seems to me that only by exhausting all these possibilities that we...

i don’t admit from all my conversations in moscow with a variety of people, it seems to me that neither the leadership nor the country as a whole are in any way ready for such methods, then i begin to think, what else could be? well, first of all,

i have good assistants, american centers that study what vulnerabilities they, their countries have, and what russia could do about this? this is what is called from the category that they themselves propose, these ideas and some of them would not have occurred to me myself, but some of them... in general, they are not so radical that they carry mortal danger, but they would be immediately very noticeable and very visible, share, it’s very interesting, well, i won’t list it, but in general the list is quite large, well, let me add, well, there is such a country as israel, they are not in a position war with iran, but... it is absolutely clear that they consider iran as an enemy, so

again they killed a group of iranian general officers who were in their consulate in damascus, which means that such a method exists, and it is interesting that iran is on such action so far he responded with understandable indignation, but in general,

“we will do everything possible to block the routes for arms supplies to russia from iran to andra and china, because they pose a threat not only to ukraine, they are a threat to european security as a whole.” therefore, france and all european countries are very interested in doing everything possible to prevent supplies that strengthen russian military power."

lack of constructive relations, of course you can seriously think about how to narrow the possibility of a collective west, and it in the presence of those pseudo-relations, economic, and military, political, but everyone has already mentioned submarine cables, which are very important for the normal functioning of the financial system, but...

for russia to do at least one of the things that i mentioned, because all these things could backfire, what i'm saying is that given the large number of things that are available to russia, i think russia might consider, and i'll go further, i think russia would think about how it could, what it could do to signal to the collective west that it is time to stop,

to signal in a language that will be obvious, even to the most incomprehensible. we're leaving for advertising, we'll be back in just a few minutes. we spoke with the head of the international olympic committee on behalf of one of the african politicians. the russian anthem cannot be performed. the russian flag cannot be raised. in fact, he could be contradicting himself. to begin with, he violated his own charter, his own rules. now thomas himself. i will also inform president macron about this initiative, he seems to have to develop the entire world sport, and he tells us, i will call this, that, that, so that they don’t go there, now, apparently, they are preparing some kind of document that will

warn athletes that if they come for the friendship game, they could be disqualified, the russian olympic committee, after we suspended them... made several rather aggressive statements that this was discrimination, fascism, but he did not even argue that this was discrimination and fascism. premiere, vavan show and lexus. today is the first one. virtual reality is a place where everything impossible is possible. i see you, you are now in my room. hello. several people can be in the virtual space at once, that is, for example, a factory is located.

politicians in the west will understand the futility of continuing this strategy of inflicting a decisive defeat on russia, we may sometimes have the impression that as soon as we achieve this turning point in the west’s attitude towards us, all other issues will be automatically resolved, that is, the west as

would be a weak point, because he doesn’t want to lose, doesn’t want to sacrifice, doesn’t want to endure , and so on and so forth. i am sure that we need to continue our line of dividing the west, pitting supporters and opponents against each other, strengthening our positions with our arguments, our victories, strengthening the positions of those who are against further escalation, but the weak point in this story is, in fact, ukraine, this is something we need to pay attention to, of course, if necessary, not only military attention, but all other attention.

we introduced the bill together with the senator tsekov, precisely because we believe that at the heart of this propaganda of ukraine since 1914, the foundation stone is the accusation that russia took away our native land, so we must consider it an enemy. we did not take away any native land, it’s just the opposite, in the ninety-first year, as a result of the collapse of the belovesh agreement, having violated all laws, ukraine, having left ... the soviet union, took with it what did not belong to it, was illegal to it transferred. this is just one small touch you need to understand that this is necessary. unfortunately, we still have the prevailing opinion that we don’t need to touch on these issues and so on, but if we don’t need to touch on these issues, then why did vladimir putin

tell tucker kalson for so long about what was the prehistory of all of our relations? with ukraine, what ukraine is, how it arose, why it received such a name, if all this is not important, this is really important, because it influences wavering minds, not so much in the west, but in ukraine, where ... must come to the conclusion that if they want to live and prosper, then in this case they need , like crimea, to come to our side, then they will receive the crimean bridge, power plants, the tavrida highway, everything else that they received during their independence from ukraine, only oligarchs, this work, it must be strengthened many times over, because now the time has come for it, the first shock from what happened in 2020 has passed, people are beginning to think about how they can live further, how they can avoid death, how they can to avoid... mobilization, war and everything else, this is the time for large-scale work and propaganda. thank you, aleksandrevich, i think

that, by the way, in modern wars everyone knows that images play a huge role. we need to focus on the image of our victory. look, when we imagine, we won in ukraine, so what? it's so hard to imagine what, what victory would look like. okay, it's a terrorist group, so what do we do? how to cover this legal, legal, legitimate vacuum with our

point of view, these are very closely related things. if we imagine a real victory, what will be the state system, borders, what will be the structure, what, in fact, perhaps, will be the name of the statehood that will be won by us in this victory, respectively, and after that, i agree with zatulin, we it is necessary to broadcast this image to ukrainians. i must say, look, part, the eastern part of crimea - this is understandable, these are new russia, these are russians, but that second part of the westerners, it should also have its place in this image, in our project, and it is extremely important to show that by going over to the side of the empire from their nazism, they do not lose, but gain enormous opportunities, this is a very fundamental point, because it is precisely on...

in such an intermittent, but continuously ongoing american-chinese dialogue, occupies a fairly high place there. the positions of the parties are far from each other. surely this question was raised in today's telephone conversation between the two presidents, the united states and china. there is already talk that such a dialogue is being prepared over the telephone. for a while.

and of course, once again convey a message to the americans that do not, do not play with fire in taiwanese affairs. we, of course, will not

know what was mean in this conversation. official protocol messages, apparently, it will be clear as always that the parties discussed issues of mutual interest, but i have the feeling that there will be no changes in the positions of the parties, they are quite far from each other, mutual understanding, for now, in my opinion, somewhere far beyond the horizon, including on the issue ukraine has more than 50 countries. the united states either imposes sanctions against russia or submits to american sanctions, russia is victorious, and there is something

to be proud of.

influence not only western public opinion, but the opinion of western elites, who from my point of view are hypocritical, who from my point of view are often arrogant, but as they say, no one wanted to die, they also think about their voters, and if this war became truly unpopular in their countries, that would also have a big impact.

it was a great game, see you tomorrow on air. each new decision of the international olympic committee turns out to be worse than the previous one. how else could we harm russia in december? last year could have agreed to allow russian and belarusian athletes to the olympic games in paris, but with restrictions it is impossible to use national symbols, colors, flags and anthems. our response to such provocations was the friendship games, which will be held under the motto “sport beyond politics.” but the international olympic committee was indignant: russia is trying to create its own alternative to the olympics. now thomas bach himself is calling on the world to boycott

the friendship games, and the european union is helping him in this. who planned the conspiracy against russian sports, what new sanctions did western officials come up with for our athletes? the answers to these and many other questions in our frank conversation with the president of the international olympic committee, thomas bach. today. honored master of sports of russia state duma deputy svetlana zhurova, city master sergei koryakin, honored master of sports of russia and football expert evgeny lovchev. hello friends, let's get started. relations between russia and mog have been consistently collapsing for more than 7 years.

we decided to find out about the true reasons for this attitude towards our country. one of the african countries very much supports thomas bach in his desire to harm russia and is ready to follow any of his recommendations. and i can also assure you that i greatly appreciate the opportunity to discuss with you this extremely complex geopolitical situation and its impact on all of our lives. and you know, i was very happy when president wada contacted me. that there is an opportunity to hold this meeting, i am very glad, i think we have a common goal, i heard about the situation around the russian athlete, she was involved in this case,

it is mind-blowing, for me it is terrible, yes, just like for us, the russian the government repeated this and even gave her a special welcome and special honor. they stated that they support her and that this court verdict is incorrect and biased. it's really terrible what 's happening there. i heard about several articles in the world media, about statements from the russian side, that they don’t want to give up your gold medals that you deprived them of, but in this case i can take the medals from our employees, i’ll pick them up and bring them to your office.

treated me badly, he came to moscow, we were very nice here, we talked well, we even celebrated the birthday of the president of an international federation with him there, everything was very nice, he always seemed to be with us, you know, there is such a weather vane, yes, now a different wind blows, the weather vane changes direction, this is what happened to bach, this is how to spoil relations with one of the presenters countries of the world, sports, of course it’s just ugly, bang. all the time he distorts what happened and what mostly did not happen, in the last few years, he has become a figure hostile to us, unfriendly, as they say softly now, but i will say it differently,

he is our opponent regarding valieva, his statement , svetlana, in the case of valeeva, of course, we understand that they could have announced these results before the olympic games, this is the most important, such an important nuance, they intended it. if they say it was unintentional, i will never believe it in my life, it means you delayed this process, you knew that there was already some kind of microdose, you could have removed her and this issue with the medal would not have been at stake, here is the last statement that was made, you know, valieva is not to blame, now there, certain officials again say that her environment, adults, and so on are to blame, oh, how interesting, that is, then kas made the wrong decision, because kas’s question was as follows: did the athlete valieva deliberately use doping, they told her: you’re not for us.. .proved, it means sorry intentionally, now they say that the environment is to blame, they themselves have already turned it around by practically acquitting valieva, and...