what was she doing there? it’s a long story, tell me, well, tell me, us, we love stories, sit there quietly, this was your plan, yes, you wanted to hand us over, but i gave you up, you were waiting for us with this policewoman, right? she definitely wasn’t invited to a family dinner, but she had to improvise.

hey, hey, autako, help.

and your mark would have been seized in an hour if you hadn’t come, that’s enough, the police, no, these are not the police, these are most likely mark’s people, let me drive, sit down, i’ll drive.

mom, they’re catching up, faster, i needed everything for the role, faster, faster, faster, no distract me, oh, hold on.

ayaw man.

beautiful bouquet, thank you, this is from evgeniy, he is my classmate, yes, yes, classmate, you should have seen how he swore at the aunts from the fourteenth ward when they gossiped about your son, it’s right that he swore, because he’s a decent person, because he wants to help, and if you spread gossip, you will get from me, not a vital commodity. you love me, my hand is light , the injections don’t hurt. tom, oh, excuse me, don’t be shy, evgenia, come in, i’m already finished, and tamara vitelevna you is waiting, you have no one else to give injections, or something, stop chatting, but no one gives me such beautiful bouquets, why are you, zhen, come in,

tom, there’s such a thing here, what, um... in general, that’s probably all, not it will work, why? well , kolya found a way to take oleg out on a military boat, they’ll take him in finland, bring him to st. petersburg, but for a bribe of 3 million. i said, kolya, hang up, where did you get that kind of money? sorry, i'll look for someone else. you're an idiot! i don’t understand, i’m asking you, are you an idiot, why did you cancel everything, come on, call your general, let him negotiate, it’s become difficult, i understand your despair, but without money no one will do anything, i’ll find the money, but

where do you have nothing, i’ll sell the apartment, don’t sell it so quickly for that kind of money, i ’ll take a loan. “they should give me a loan, it’s a lot, if they give it, it will be on the security of an apartment, i have a friend at the bank, maybe he can help, come on, call your friend, a loan is hard, it will take a long time to repay, are you ready, yes .

there is a big game on air, the main event of the day in the field of international security. became an agreement, as it is called, an agreement on a comprehensive strategic partnership, signed with the head of the dprk, who, in general.

any agreement between two states or between several states, it is strong not

so much in the wording that is included in it, but in the way it is implemented, in this case i am more than sure that the implementation of the agreement just signed between the russian federation and... and not only and not only the west, because there is also japan, there is south korea, well,

the biggest indignation i saw was in the means mass media controlled by fugitives from russia, there is simply real hysteria, putin’s russia is turning into north korea, russia will fight in the country of north korea.

for russia's interests in the region in the 21st century, the center of gravity of international political, economic interests, and in the future military-political rivalry. shifts to the asia-pacific region. russia was often perceived there rather as an observer, whereas our country is a very significant and full-fledged participant in regional processes, strengthening bilateral relations, and as you saw, the russian president announced that russia will promote the easing and lifting of the sanctions regime

against north korea, russia firmly says that it is very influential. participants in these international processes, not only the united states and china will determine the nature of the development of the situation in this region. well, we see the development of vladimir vladimirovich’s thesis that when pressure is placed on our country, we will use asymmetrical and flexible methods response, including transferring valuable instruments of influence, including military instruments of influence, to the antagonists of those people who are using them against us. weapons on the territory of ukraine. thank you. korin georgievich, i have some personal satisfaction about this visit and this agreement. and i have personal satisfaction not because i had at least some connection to him, but personal satisfaction because, to be honest, i was offended for

the power, for the russian power throughout all years, when to one degree or another. allowed washington, london, their allies to determine the international agenda and also determine the prism through which we looked at the world, they demonized iran in the collective west, they demonized the democratic people's republic of korea, i have never been to north korea and will not pretend to even for some kind of examination. even if you just watch the chronicle of the visit, you see that apkinyanyan, as vladimir vladimirovich putin said, but became different, different city, it’s not like this, as we were told, is one continuous barracks, well, those of us who stand at this table will probably find it difficult to remember the last time

north korea was accused of terrorism, and...

what are you created, well, north korea really, it was created by the soviet union, i must say, the north koreans, how they live, that this is their business, but you can’t refuse them gratitude, they remember it, unlike many others, they remember it and appreciate it , and of course, in my opinion, this is very important, you said correctly, this is such

a turn, a turn from the policy towards which russia was moving towards... it’s very important, that’s what is laid down, right here, mr. senator, he said, so to speak, how it was formulated, and what is laid down inside, everything can be laid down inside, anything, firstly,

is in confrontation with the western world, first of all with the united states, still somehow more, more definitely unite, more definitely, this is no longer, this is already obvious, i have a feeling that china is maturing this understanding, some other countries but it seems to me that this step began precisely with this agreement in north korea, and further additional steps may follow, then we will see... in this region. i think that

the creation of a new military bloc in this region or anywhere else, i do not think that this will be discussed. but it seems to me that life will force it, from this point of view it will be very interesting to watch the next visit of our president, he is from phinyang. flies to hanoi, and vietnam is a country that, with with its very difficult, dramatic history, it remembers well, and the assistance that the soviet union provided, but this is a country that the same united states today considers as already pro-western, as a country that they, as it were...

a psychological country of affairs, with us everyone, including me, at least, well, somehow in the time after the end of the cold war, developed very modest expectations of what russia can expect from diplomacy, here you go, this is the fiasco that was the ukrainian so-called peace summit in switzerland. there was a fiasco there, but the countries that we somehow want to see in moscow as friends of russia are primarily serbia, but

hungary is also somehow ranked.

in my opinion, this will continue in the future, this particular moment should not affect the general attitude in any way, because we still have a lot of events ahead, representation in the eu is ahead, here is hungary and in my opinion, we will still see a lot of things, i am with i agree with you that we are not in a position where we should push someone away, but i don’t know if you agree that... not only are they bad, but also good examples can be contagious, and what north korea did is a landmark phenomenon? i think yes, i think yes, we will see this in the future, because we see very well how events are developing in ukraine, we see very well that russia is gradually achieving the tasks set there, and i think that many countries, looking at this, will change their policies and

will listen more to actions. some kind of special relationship has developed, but we can, we can express our displeasure, this does not mean that you can spoil relationships, but in any case, be more definite in this sense, you know, because this is something that then also causes some kind of reaction, because some people get used to the fact that we to which we don’t react, but you say, okay, fine, we ate it, well, we don’t have to, we definitely have to publicly, we don’t necessarily have to publicly. well,

the americans do this publicly, you see, it works for them, but we are still embarrassed, why shouldn’t we express our opinion, at least to what happened, they, by the way, excuse me, the hungarians too, that they get our oil at low prices, what they actually risk, karen, i completely agree with you, but this may be because it’s not you, not me, not the diplomats, here you are, andrey a...

where did the phenomenon come from that some countries withdrew their signatures, they simply, perhaps, in terms of regulations, were not fully informed that this statement should be issued, and more often than not , all conference participants are simply recorded as allegedly signers, although this is simply chairman's statement, the summit, which was planned for more than a year, gave zero results, isn't this indicative, but nevertheless here...

the first world war and a lot of other things were done for you, and we were your only friend in a difficult dispute for russia about kosovo, but you haven’t found an opportunity to support us more, humanly we understand you, that

’s it, of course, so president trump’s former national security adviser, robert o’brien, published only... politics during trump’s second term, and i he has always strongly advocated cautious theses that the american president will act in american interests, and despite all the arguments and theses that

he will end the ukrainian crisis within 24 hours, that the democrats and biden are on the wrong path. the last thing he will be ready to do is to abandon any of the foreign policy instruments that are useful to the united states. what ukraine is like now. ukraine is an investment of american resources, attention, energy, symbolic capital is large. they won't let this investment implode immediately without exchanging it for something. can the united states offer us something as part of this trade? i highly doubt it. and unfortunately, the first term of trump's rule showed that platforms for deep and...

in search of some window of opportunity, but i repeat that i doubt that american foreign policy interests in this crisis, they may imply some kind of unconditional surrender positions, their position now not only in

ukraine, but throughout the entire circle of allies, who support ukraine, supply it with finances, supply it with weapons, supply it with intelligence data, train it. trump has made it clear that he wants to

resolve the conflict through negotiations that will end the bloodshed and ensure the security of ukraine. trump would continue to supply lethal aid to ukraine at the expense of european countries, at the same time, he would maintain room for maneuver in diplomatic relations with russia, unsettling moscow with his unpredictability. he would also call on nato to move ground forces air force in poland to strengthen the military presence near the russian border and send an unequivocal message. that nato will defend its entire territory from external aggression. washington must make sure its european allies understand that continued us defense of europe depends on europe doing its part, including in ukraine. if europe wants to show that it is serious about defending ukraine, it should immediately admit the country into the eu, abandoning the standard bureaucratic entry procedure. such a move would send a strong signal to putin: the west will not cede ukraine to russia.

we heard something new, that a person closely associated with trump and who hopes to occupy a key position in the administration, does not mean anything new and interesting for russia , for me this is new, that is, from a change in the places of the terms, the amount is hardly unexpected, no, unexpected, but you need to know this, keep this in mind, georgievich, well, if you remember, i said a long time ago that i do not share the illusions

of some, let’s say, some part of our political, political science elite about trump and there is no reason, everything he did, there is no way to think, in this remark of this gentleman, the most important thing is the ending, the west will not give up ukraine, that’s what, that’s what he says, clearly, without any , as they say, in this. in this position, there is nothing new in this for me, so i always believed that no matter who the president of the united states is today, they will not change this position regarding russia, because the war in ukraine, which they provoked, which they have prepared it, it is very beneficial to them, it weakens, in their opinion, the main enemy, and the main enemy, despite all their... so to speak nods towards china, is actually

russia, because russia is a superpower. china, yes, is economically powerful, china, so to speak, but china has not yet entered this state, if you want to put it simply, whoever defends its independence by military means is a superpower, china is still hesitating, so as they say, in my opinion, it is obvious that for them the main enemy is russia, what they were able to do to drag this war into... they understand that, in principle, these are the eastern slavs, russians, ukrainians - these are the eastern slavs, so they forced the eastern slavs to fight among themselves, not a fact, they understand that these eastern slavs will not unite later , as has often happened, that is , they, they don’t care that they kill ukrainians,

that they kill russians, it still works in their opinion, in their opinion, in weakening us as something possible.

doctrine, let's listen to what the deputy minister just said about this foreign affairs, sergey ribkov. recent experience, including that gained during the svo and the analysis of the behavioral model of the collective west in connection with the svo , show that it is necessary to clarify certain parameters that are applicable to situations

described in the military doctrine as such, in the fundamentals of state policy in the field of nuclear deterrence, we conduct our work from the point of view.

development and we’ll see what happens in this regard, what decisions will be made, i would like to remind you that the last time the russian nuclear doctrine was updated was during presidency of dmitry medvedev, and that version of the doctrine, it was more restrictive, not only than previous russian documents. but also much more restrictive than the corresponding documents of the united states, great britain and france, all these documents of our adversaries, they included the possibility of using nuclear weapons if the allies were attacked. russia has just signed

an agreement with the democratic people's republic of korea, in the version that russian nuclear doctrine exists today. but it is not obvious that a strike on north korea, the most severe, could give rise to russian retaliation, and where there is no potential for retaliation, there is weak deterrence. if you want your doctrine to contribute not to war, but to deterrence, then it seems to me there is clarity, preciseness, they are very constructive, we are leaving for advertising, we will be back in just a few minutes. we chose two heads of poland, two former presidents, we called them from petro poroshenko. the issue of importing ukrainian grain , farmers come, they blockade cities, which this is what a ukrainian says to the poles: on your belly, on

your knees, crawl here, holob, we are supplying thorns to europe, we are getting out of here, we are planning world domination, listen, if they overhear us, it will turn out that we are going to the kremlin together. america is leaving western europe at the mercy of the current confrontation with russia. apparently, france and poland will be at the forefront of this adventure? such a country that will do everything for money, i hope that in ukraine they will remember that level of assistance, it was a gigantic assistance that is still has not yet been compensated, well, you still have to pay for it, yes, and we will remind you every penny, what is the true price of polish-ukrainian friendship, the vavan and lexus show, today on the first, in memory of anastasia, zavorotnyuk. we remember a wonderful person, an amazing woman, a colleague,

a friend. anastasia zvorotnyuk, seventy-first year of birth. she didn’t feel very well, everyone thought it was just a nerve injury. they went to check and found it. that is, you can say, practically yes on your birthday. i noticed that a new, new pendant, rt, appeared on her chest. i turn around and say: “ charming boss, she tells me, no one knows this, i say, but i already know, i say, you need to buy a burqa, if it was transported somewhere, taken somewhere, then it was all in shambles, thanks to the doctors , to the nurses, that it didn’t turn out anywhere, i wanted to come up and say, this can’t be, get up, when the next morning there were terrible, monstrous, blatant publications about how there was a lot of makeup, i wanted to give a face to what didn’t exist at all, to live after death. a person can only in art, only it is capable of defeating death, on saturday on the first, you are also good

to send it to the forest, you have already gone crazy with your collective farm, and this is your bear, it was fashionable for someone else to bring it, it is not mine, i love you, varya, i can’t forget, i’ll leave olga, just tell me, i’ve already come close to death twice, that means i love you to death, war has been declared, yes, i heard, he’s writing from home, no, he’s not writing, the devil

knows what’s wrong , two shores, the premiere of the serial film from june 24, on the first, who? when i look at the world's reaction to the failed peace conference in switzerland and the highly successful summit in phinyang, there is one group that has steadfastly welcomed whatever is being directed.

is controlled by the enemies of russia, that they have, in general, turned into, well, modern vlasovites who show their activity in a variety of forms, but that in relation to them, as it were, is a common denominator, they do not just want to change the russian position on some issue , they are not just dissatisfied with the current russian government, they want... something fundamentally changed in russia sees in the victory of the west the key to

fulfilling their, if you like, desires, well, for example, what the fugitive russian businessman chichvarkin, well known in western narrow circles, says about this. kiev is my karmic recap, even after being bombarded with ballistics, i came out and was ready to hug buildings and trees. i believe that putin’s defeat in ukraine, the chances of which are getting smaller and smaller, but could change the power in russia for the better, that’s what a well -known in russia, but long forgotten, now says fugitive journalist of ignorance? one way or another, but a strategic love alliance has been concluded with the ugliest, dangerous, poor and insane country, this is russia’s frank recognition

of its ugliness, danger, and insanity of dependence. so georgievich, otherwise these are direct quotes from, what’s his name , the karamazov brothers, stinkers, remember, absolutely, there is, the stupid nation won, when he talks about invading the french, in vain, well, i don’t remember verbatim, the stupid nation defeated the smart , so he says, well, it’s the same thing, absolutely, it’s just this, well, i i often said, well, this is...

colleagues, all this reminds me of a film from our childhood, my childhood, at least, this is the crown of the russian empire, where the situation inside the opposition was shown in a grotesque form, inside, well, at that time, the opposition that there was, by god, then we watched it all with laughter, not really understanding how, what it was and how, well, funny, and how this could be, yes, now watch it, please, this

film turned out to be prophetic, because what what happens there is what is shown in the film and what what we see, in fact... correlates very well, but as for statements of this kind, well, look, this is the principle of natural selection, and the feeder becomes smaller, there are not enough means for subsistence, accordingly, what begins, begins the interspecies struggle that we are now generally observing, the one who tries to croak louder is hoping to grab a larger piece of cheese from those small ones. inside these people is all that you are talk about the psychological, philosophical

phenomenon that we are faced with, i agree with you, i even tell you...

how dangerous it is to have radical emigration, ready for anything, constantly appealing to the worst instincts of our enemies, so

this is what is most urgent for me now, it is not the motives of these people, not the moral qualities of these people, but how they joined the outright enemies of russia. during the war and what russia should do about this, senator, i completely agree with you, i agree, but joining the enemy, well, you can put it another way, so to speak, this national betrayal is possible, but the abandonment of national interests, the abandonment of the homeland by and large, and... from one’s people, yes, that’s why andrei correctly said that they are even trying to create some kind of combat

detachments, which means that their sponsors, their western ones, have come to understand that they are not only not needed for anything else, but are also incapable of doing anything else, but to feel sorry for them... i think there is no reason, but the more they are enlisted in such combat detachments, the shorter their the path of life, on this, on this wise thought, it was a big game, we’ll meet tomorrow on the air, hurray, hurray, i fought, not yet, who hasn’t yet?