the assault phase began, the task seemed crazy, but doable, a feeling of pride for the russian army, for our grandfathers, it’s a big victory that we took avdiivka, let’s go, let’s go, let’s go, with tanks you won’t completely defeat the enemy with artillery, but they are specifically going to assault, this is close combat with small arms, a grenade, the coordination of the guys is excellent, everyone understands each other, everyone stands behind each other, when all my relatives and the father of two sons are behind me. how can i give up or not finish my work, go forward and move, air, to victory, special report, heroes, attack aircraft on june 22, on the first, in the poem woe from wit, famusov threatened to send his daughter right here, to the village, to her aunts in the wilderness, in saratov, it doesn’t bother you that do people walk around rubbing your nose all the time? why is my nose itching because of money or rain,

so my nose itches all the time, they checked them just like that, they took a roll, covered it with a towel, sat on it, give it, give it, give it, let it go, oh well, we erase everything for the female, here a fish that is 8 years old, it is for us every year he gives caviar, tasting, or maybe another jar, we need to record the takes, the lives of our own. premiere on sunday at the first, meet, comrades, a young specialist will be doing an internship with us, where is the mugimo student, and where is the tailoring? don’t be afraid, he confused us with mandeli’s house, he’s coveted a mannequin, let’s go to paris with you, we’ll pack our bags and leave tomorrow. lyovochka, what happened, he’s cheating on me, what happened, how could you? act so unworthily, he is from

another world, he will play around and come back, and you you will suffer, sweet, charming, simple, well, not as beautiful as your past hobbies, but she is the one who can ruin our wedding, we need something so that the groom sees it right away, he wants it, he somehow doesn’t act like a human on the bride dress your fiance, thin materials, on sunday on the first, what, did i call then? humor is the most important thing in our life, you can’t live without a smile, when you smile, everything goes better, then i’ll tell you a joke, if i see a sad person... then i’ll sing a clean song,

or something else, the most important thing for me is that people around me were smiling, a sense of humor is always appropriate, but you need to know in what moments, laughter prolongs life, laughter is an emotion and laughter charges us for a new achievement, there is food on the table, a cucumber with potatoes, i’m not afraid to work, especially with a spoon, smiles and for simple human happiness, russia, we love you. what is this? coordinates where oleg needs to be picked up? what oleg, we are flying to liquidation. get in. commander, if not today, then that’s it.

stop doing this bullshit and load the helicopter. new coordinates? no, so what? lol, very good it is necessary, not, under my responsibility. well, are we standing, who are we waiting for? let's fly to save your oleg.

did you find the boy? no, we didn't find it. there’s not much time, so let’s do it this way, now you can call your son yourself, and we’ll all go to sweden together, fuck you! okay,

helicopter, helicopter there, simple. untie my parents, because i shot, and you know that if you shoot, your fingers will be torn off from the dacha, the gun is huge, and you are small, kill a tree.

guy, what are you asking for a gun, untie my parents, the second field i’ll shoot you.

we wait for 15 minutes and fly away, but here i learned how to shoot from my mother when i shot at the police, well done, i never do that again, stop, where did they run?

let's fly! let me in, hide the pistol!

take off, well, they weren’t there, i’ll raise the child myself, i have no complaints against you. during the broadcast of a special analytical edition of the big game in washington, new york, and moscow, the article that appeared aroused great attention. trump, but in general it turned out that

it was not very encouraging for russia. we will now talk about this article and more generally about american politics with christian whiten, who held major positions in the state department in the trump and bush administrations. and who played a role in the preparation of that article that i just talked about. christian, we are very glad to welcome you, thank you for taking the time. christian has repeatedly performed on our program, and we have all been with you for a long time, you have your own audience in russia and you are considered a knowledgeable and honest person, and i fully subscribe to this opinion. but that's why. "i have to ask you, here

based on your understanding of the situation in the trump campaign, based on what you know about the positions of candidate trump himself. there is reason in moscow to hope that if trump became president, american policy towards russia would change in one direction, but more, if you like. perhaps something will change, but this is not certain. if trump really becomes president,

the first thing he will do is deal with domestic politics, we need to solve problems with the budget, because this problem is very acute, and i think trump does not want him to they perceived it as if he was capitulating to moscow, but on the other hand, well, if only russian troops had broken through. and began to approach kiev, trump would probably think that this would put him in an unfavorable light, i think he would... but if we return to the analogy with nixon and vietnam, perhaps he will think that escalation is needed for subsequent de-escalation . if

you want to agree on something, you must first stabilize the situation. on the battlefield, but so far there is no stability, ukraine is so far only steadily retreating, in any in this case, policy is determined not by experts, but by those people who occupy key positions in the administration, and trump usually does this: he chooses people who take a tougher position than himself, who are inclined towards russia, in relation to russia, a little more negative, this has all been going on since...

yes, i really helped robert write this article, but the reaction in the media was a little exaggerated. o'brien is not actually saying that all trade with china should be stopped completely, but he is saying that

to significantly reduce economic ties, in fact he spoke about this. trump's economic adviser, he said that it is necessary to introduce tariffs, duties on trade with china, 60 percent, so gradually, gradually , supplies from china will come to naught, there are all sorts of things, there are some very simple things, like trash cans, but there are computer chips, there are some pharmaceuticals and so on, but as for... he proposes to resume nuclear tests, because we have not carried out. china is now building up its nuclear arsenal, so we need to look

at its nuclear arsenal, which is approximately equal to russia's, before it was...

maybe in indonesia, these are all defensive steps, because no one seriously thinks that... in the usa the mainland and china are going to organize some kind of invasion. no, everyone understands that this is impossible. many people talked about the need to shift the focus to asia. and finally, the time has come to do this in order to prevent war in the asia-pacific region. and if i may, regarding ukraine, i wanted to add, he says that we need to stop the violence there. i have no doubt that uh.

it’s hard for me to imagine an american administration that would agree to accept such arguments, right? well, yes, so , maybe this is really some kind of double standards, or maybe it’s because we know about the chinese that they always violate all the agreements that they conclude, for example, they promised hong kong at one time that for 50 years, after the british left hong kong, there will be...

and then the united states regained the philippines and then granted them independence. in general, this is a part of the world where there is a lot of trade, a lot of trade routes, so your analogy, dmitry, is still not entirely appropriate. but yes, i agree, sometimes it happens that we apply double standards, this is what is called american exceptionalism.

and when crimea was handed over to ukraine under khrushchov, these are all historical facts that

even many experts in washington know nothing about, so this is already a thing of the past, now this is all no longer relevant, but if trump wins the election, then he will be on his team. will take people who really want to solve this problem, to end the war, and they believe that if borders need to be changed, then they can be changed, but this must be done through peaceful negotiations, over time, through a peace process through economic ties, of course, this is not the case in ukraine now, and now the main thing is that the violence stops, people stop dying and... in any case, all this should be financed by europe, while the usa there are more important things to do. you can, i think, agree with me that this is not the case in moscow;

they are interested in who will pay for the armament of ukraine; they are more interested in the very fact of constantly pumping ukraine up with weapons and what ukraine is now allowed to do. with american advisers providing american intelligence data involving

ukraine, and that russia has no reason to react to this. now i’m not talking about what’s good and bad, i’m staying in the country from moral arguments, but what worries me is that washington doesn’t understand how much this kind of action increases the threat of a direct military clash between russia and the united states, which i hear from...

for the defeat in afghanistan and nothing really works out either, so the administration itself does not know what to do next, on the one hand they thought that maybe we will now give the ukrainians f16 so that they can use them. against russia, but so that they are based not on the territory of ukraine, but somewhere on the territory of nato, but then it turns out that nato is already entering into a war with russia, and this is also not particularly true anywhere is being discussed, if i went out on the street now and started asking people, what do you think, if we essentially go to war with russia, people would be very surprised, no one tells them how close we are to

the risk of nuclear escalation. in general, the situation is reminiscent of the war in vietnam, when our establishment, our military, without realizing it, dragged us into this war, into this conflict, but on the other hand, we have the opportunity once every 4 years to radically change our external appearance. political course, so it's good, and there was also one important interview in newsweek, newsweek is quite important. magazine, it had some kind of decline, but now it is again experiencing a new rise, there the russian ambassador to the united states gave a long interview and clearly stated what russia wants, on what conditions it is ready to end the war in ukraine, and i know that the cia, the state department and, it seems, the white house paid attention to this interview, this is a very important point.

honest opinion shows that biden beat him by a little 1-2%, possibly as a result of the fact that trump was found guilty in that infamous new york state court, is that the explanation or more seriously, is it just these regular fluctuations in opinion polls many months before

the election. went to italy for a meeting of the g7, and there he made a very fool of himself several times, all this just reminds voters how old he is, how poorly he thinks already, and let’s not

forget that when we have elections , you need to look at those states that really matter. in the republican states, trump is winning, but there are important states: florida, ohio, georgia, arizona, where he is doing well now, and even those controversial states that usually still vote for democrats, nevada, michigan, pennsylvania, trump there too either leading or on par with biden. you see, it’s important not just to get as many votes as possible, everything is decided by the electoral votes. was the decision of the new york state constitutional court, which

stated that they would not consider the appeal, since the appeal does not raise constitutional issues, it seemed to me like an attempt to silence candidate trump. and not allowing him to speak freely about how that trial took place, where he was found guilty, it seemed to me that this raises the most basic constitutional issue, the first amendment of freedom of speech, how is this perceived in the united states? but it is perceived depending on which party you belong to. and those who are against trump, they rejoice when something is done against trump, but the democrats, unfortunately, do not understand that this plays against them, this is not makes people abandon trump,

vote against him, on the contrary, people believe that democrats are using the judicial system to prosecute trump, there is a term. it’s no longer new york, but some kind of backwater, where there is no real justice in pomin. after all, new york and california are places that have a serious reputation. as you probably know, president putin

held talks today in hanoi, the capital of vietnam, and he arrived in hanoi after very important talks in pyongyang with the korean managers.

well, what's the reaction? silence, this is generally characteristic of the biden administration, when something happens in the world, the world becomes.

and what is happening now, but the united states believes that this can be a very dangerous country, it has nuclear weapons and, in general, there is a stalinist regime operating there. north korea, why does it have nuclear weapons, because south korea is unlikely to attack north korea. but this country wants to play a certain role

in the international arena, and its role is changing over time, before it always asked some kind of help from the united states, from china, recently it is believed that thanks to hacker attacks, they were able to earn billions of dollars, and the government of this country... is absolutely unpredictable, so donald trump believed that it was necessary to build relations with leader of this country, and joe biden, on the contrary, decided that he could ignore north korea, but north korea is such a country that when you don’t pay attention to it, it becomes even more dangerous, they have nuclear weapons, long-range missiles, now everyone is saying:

they pay less attention to africa, but there

were also american french troops there before, and now russian forces are there, that’s why, i think, french president macron said that maybe the west will send its military to ukraine, but this just brings me back to the idea that we...

think everyone is calculating only one move ahead, that’s it, no one looks further. thank you very much, it was a very interesting and important conversation, we hope to see you soon back on our air. thank you. let's go to advertising. enemy equipment, enemy personnel, grenade launchers, and machine guns were destroyed.

what a grenade, coherence, the guys are excellent, everyone understands each other, everyone stands behind each other, when all my loved ones and my father, two sons are behind me, how can i give up or not finish my work, go forward and move, air, to victory, special report, heroes, attack aircraft, june 22 on the first. in memory of anastasia zavorotnyuk. the one who seeks will receive, even if you. and superstar. i am victoria prutkovskaya, a representative of an exclusive cosmetics company. today we are without, i was a very

homely girl, i didn’t go to any discos or any parties. in the evening we won’t prepare what we’ll wear to work tomorrow, no, every morning we stand in front of the wardrobe in our underwear, in a panic, you know, i’m such a person, i close the door once and never open it again, i clearly accept decision and continue to follow it, and don’t look back, i’m absolutely happy, because somehow my whole picture, here it is so correct and the way it should be, what i have dreamed of since childhood. on saturday on the first. this year we celebrate the anniversary of the great victory. let's talk about songs of the war years. for me, the most heartfelt songs are those that were heard in our films.

a special analytical edition of the big game is on air. president putin’s visit to the democratic people’s republic of korea in vietnam has just ended; the visit, from my point of view, is very important, potentially even historic. what does this all mean? what this could lead to, and what kind of... visit the reaction in the west, we will now discuss this with alexei konstantinovich pushkov, chairman of the federation council commission on information policy, and with me.

now this is probably becoming the main vector, well, in general, the reorientation of russia towards the global south, towards the leading countries of the global

south that are part of the brix, in particular towards those states that, well, let’s say, were a possibility, but have now become a reality with point of view of active russian foreign policy. well, it seems to me that in this case, everything is natural in... the enemy of my enemy is my friend, the factor that north korea has been opposing the united states throughout the entire period after world war ii, first of all, and, of course, its allies, it now leads to the fact that since we we are also in hostile relations with the united states, it’s time to use this term. the united states is in no way a partner for us now, in any way. it is completely natural that there is a rapprochement between moscow and pyongyang, for there are many reasons for this, both economic

and military-political in nature, from the point of view of what korea can do to strengthen russian military potential, and what we, for our part, can do to strengthen the position of the korean people's democratic republic, which is still in such a very strict isolation and so i think it was a matter of time, you know, when the united states says that they are concerned about the rapprochement between russia and china, when they are already quasi we practically have an alliance with beijing, with even greater concern about russia’s rapprochement with north korea, i would like to ask american politicians a question, what were they actually waiting for, you know, well, if you do, they contributed to this, they didn’t just contribute, they ... pushed us in this direction for a very long time, i don’t want to say that we had bad relations with north korea, but they were, let’s say,

potentially good, that is, there were certain interactions, kimcherin came, by the way, to russia, we had good relationship, but now they are becoming active, they have now passed such a phase of increased activity, i remember. that once, once tozinsky said, in my opinion, on his global chessboard, he said that the worst scenario for the united states would be the emergence of a strategic alliance between moscow and beijing, and if iran were added to it, brzezinski said , then it will be a disaster. this was written in the mid-nineties . and i must say, i have to give it to his foresight, that’s how it happened, but this did not happen because...

at least because he did not believe that this could be done without war, in personal conversations he went further and said that there are simply people in washington who want to explode, some due to their political myopia, and some due to a great attack of opportunism. well, you know, it seems to me that ukraine’s accession to nato

is actually an extremely difficult task to achieve. this is practically impossible, we have now received two signals from the west, the main condition for ukraine’s entry into nato is said john kirby said jens stoltenberg: you just need to defeat russia. you know, when i hear such conditions, i think they consider everyone to be idiots, or they simply believe that they have developed an ideal formula that allows them to never accept ukraine into nato, because the balance of power between ukraine and russia is not such, i will not give now.

well, firstly, in conditions of military operations this is impossible, because then it is necessary to immediately invoke article 5, send american troops, german troops there and so on, on the territory of ukraine to fight with russia, as i understand it, there is no such readiness, although macron is eager to fight there, but somehow he too, you know, lenin had such an article, one step forward, two steps back, so to speak, this is the current macron on this issue, and secondly, of course, when such conditions are set, it is clear that there is no prospect of real admission of ukraine to nato, then even scholz said that he was saying: well... maybe in 30 years, listen, in 30 years it is generally unknown what will happen, so to speak, here therefore, scholz will definitely not be in power, so this is all being postponed to some incomprehensible date, so it seems to me that the topic of ukraine’s admission to nato is not relevant, the other thing that worries me is that ukraine has already become de facto in many respects, so to say, such an advanced combat detachment of nato, this can be seen from the relations between military departments in the volume of assistance to the military in

interaction. intelligence services there and so on and so forth, so they are trying to de facto turn ukraine into the vanguard of nato, and of course, this also cannot suit us when vladimir putin formulated his latest proposals for achieving lasting peace, it was clearly stated that demilitarization is one of the most important tasks, so i think that this concept is that we will make ukraine a de facto nato country.

i expected exactly such a reaction at the first stage, but what will happen later, time will tell , everything will depend on how the situation on earth changes, and i think that some sensible politicians will still think about whether what has been done proposal that is realistic, objective and consistent with the respective

interests of all contracting parties? parties throughout europe, including if it really wants to end the conflict in europe, in the center of europe, well, we’ll see about that, i’m not sure what, what... this is the attitude towards the proposals we have made, the proposals will persist forever, we can already hear the voices of some politicians who say that yes, maybe this is an ultimatum, and excessive demands, but refuse it’s impossible, you need to think and figure it out, well, the president is definitely right, this won’t last forever, but alexey, you know, is no worse than me, like a duty.

eighty-seventh, yes, and, with russia’s decisive response in ukraine, first of all, crimea and donbass, by the way, 27 years have passed, 27 years, and political generations have changed in russia and america, so in principle everything is possible, but is this possible now with those...

everyone is standing still and no one wants to move, but i know you periodically discuss the topic of prospects if elected, let’s say trump, yes, i don’t think that trump will refuse to support ukraine, but the word support, it is, you know, such a multidimensional word, it can be supported in different ways, with different degrees of intensity, with different, with different perspectives, yes, with readiness, for example, to enter into a military conflict with russia, or it can be supported without readiness. military conflict with russia, in general for trump this is not his war, he did not start this story, that’s it, he will now, so to speak, inherit it from biden, he is quite skeptical about it, leaders republican party, well, at least

the candidates in the elections that took place before our eyes, except for nikki haley, are all quite restrained about this ukrainian history, of course, he cannot now say that i will not support ukraine in the current situation in the united states this would be considered a statement. no - i have no confidence that trump will completely inherit biden’s policies, i believe he is making significant adjustments to them, i believe viktor orban when he met with trump in florida, said that trump is very skeptical about the amount of support for ukraine that is now, and moreover, orban said that if trump wins, it will be possible to create an anti-war coalition, maybe orban, for his part, is exaggerating . so to speak

, trump’s love of peace, but in any case, this is a president who did not start this quasi-war against russia and which it actually does not give anything, in fact, in general, why does the united states need ukraine, this is a very interesting question, because from the point of view security of the united states, ukraine is only a threat to the security of the united states, from a financial point of view, it is only, as they say in america, a drain, so to speak, a drain on money. so to speak, and the transfer of money from the american treasury to the ukrainian one, where it is still unclear what happens to them, from the point of view of some geopolitical special position, and what nato does not give the united states that ukraine can give them, yes, if the united states the states will want to deploy some, they are already doing this in romania, poland, yes, they are doing maneuvers in the baltic states, which does ukraine give them quality? i think ukraine is an amazing example. here

is the self-hypnosis of the west, that this is a fundamental thing for the united states of america, that without ukraine the united states will collapse, i remember at one time, i probably think that you also remember, they said so about vietnam, that if the united states loses in vietnam, then that’s it , the end, all of southeast asia will collapse, then all of asia and the whole world in general will become socialist, it turned out just the opposite, well, that didn’t happen, you know, here too, this is self-hypnosis, this this kind of self-hypnosis, geopolitical self-hypnosis, i... called it that, well , maybe trump will introduce an element of realism into this very hypnosis, he is also a realist in his own way, from the point of view of neoconservatives in america, if ukraine did not exist, it it would be necessary to come up with it, because it is russia’s neighbor, it is ready to be a springboard for the promotion of russophobia, when russia took the position that it is not satisfied with the hegemonic world order.

then the last meeting, the so-called peace summit on ukraine in bürgenstock in switzerland, and he showed one very interesting thing: the hidden agenda of this meeting was the coaptation of the global south to the side of the west on the issue of ukraine, this was the most important thing, if this works out, wider coaptation, wider cooptation, yes, you know, not a demonstration of the west’s solidarity with zelensky, because there have been many such demonstrations, this is another one.

what it gives, it means that this was precisely the point: to attract a non-western state to present russia with a fait accompli, look, you see, the whole world, not only western, but also non-western, here it is discussing, which means my the point of view in general is that the very fact of going to this conference does not mean support for either the position of kiev or the position of the west, and we were convinced of this when 15 or 16 states did not sign the final communication, this is an important point. because now there is a war of interpretation going on about this meeting, western countries and ukraine are trying to prove that since there were 92 states, then this in itself is a success, i don’t think so, i think that if the 15 leading countries of the global south did not join the final document condemning russia, after all, what countries are these, yes, china didn’t go at all, india, yes, it was at the ambassador level, not the highest level, but it was, but it didn’t sign. brazil was at

the advisor level, but did not sign, and yur was also at a very low level, but did not sign. saudi arabia was at the level of foreign minister, but also did not sign. alexey, why did they go? and you see, i think that, firstly, they went to participate, because it is, as it were , considered for these countries that they are participating in a major international process. we need it understand. this is their new desire to participate in the destinies of the world, suggests. their participation in this kind of event is the first thing, but they went to disagree, they went to disagree, you know, this is the most important moment for me, that is, presence itself. well , it would be possible not to go, as they say, by the way, how many, 70 countries did not go, these went, but they are positioning themselves as world leaders, new world leaders, they said, yes, we will, but we refuse to accept this platform , i think it's very an indicative moment, the co-optation of the global south did not happen, and the global south

demonstrated this not by its absence, but by its refusal to sign the final document, that is, it said, we do not support the program of the west and the program of kiev, this seems to me a positive result. i think it's always a question, is the glass half full or half empty? i rather think it’s more complete, i understand what you ’re saying, i think this is definitely a defeat for zelensky, i think this is a completely unimpressive option for the united states, but on the other hand, i don’t want to sound like a fan of iosifanovich’s approach, those who went there and could not...

but the fundamental struggle for the structure of the world, it most likely would have continued, yes, not even most likely, it is 100%, it would continue, now it’s easy to see what we’re talking about in order to get away from the most dangerous form of confrontation,

because in my opinion, now the situation is more dangerous than during the caribbean crisis, yet during the caribbean crisis it was, well, let’s put it this way , about quite symbolic stories. about who will show greater strength, now the situation is more complicated, because no one said that cuba is an existential issue for the united states, now the west is saying that ukraine is an existential issue, even if they, as i said, are the result of geopolitical self-hypnosis, but this is their position at the moment, that is, they need to retreat very much in order to abandon this position, and it will be difficult for them to retreat from this, russia cannot retreat either, because...