how can you come home, you were invited, how is life in general, better than it could have been, worse than you would like, you, well , about the same, marina didn’t show up? well , maybe she called, what is she like, i should remain silent now, i will remain silent, well, my goodness, peace? it looks like that, well done, pasha,

we probably don’t have such things now, sorry german, but i’m on my own, very funny, let’s rest for the battle, german, i’m serious, i’m serious too, she’s up to her neck , by the way, change the lock, otherwise you can open the door with your finger, department. for the violent ones it’s very funny, like a leg,

thank you, it’s already normal, i didn’t have time to thank you for gosha and it’s you who thank you, it’s better to tell the liri guys, i stood there for a long time, in general, thank you anyway, you ’re probably me you will never forgive, well , of course, i will cultivate a feeling of guilt, this is the best way to tie a person with a destructive personality type to yourself, so i obeyed, you said to tie, of course i obeyed, i’m calling you on business, but... you allowed me assemble a test group, uh-huh, wow, yes, he says, the group’s action during escape indicates improved communication, increased social skills, in general, he gives me six months under his own responsibility, and maybe then, i don’t know, well, i’ll see you for dinner, well, maybe, well, to discuss upcoming plans, let’s next week, or friday , or tomorrow, taken for...

karataev, pavel andreevich, well, you can say so, you don’t recognize me, pash, dad!

and in our history there are periods that were created for adventure literature, ala, alexandre dumas, for example, conspiracies, intrigues. alcove secrets, the thunder of drums, well , of course, this is the history of palace coups, first of all, of course, it is not without reason that they are very loved by our creators of such costume series, god bless him, but the trouble is that too often these series are used to judge the true history , this is what always confuses me very much. this is accurate, or according to

the novels of valentin pikul, which, not only are very far from the principle of historicism, but also simply contain a lot of historical errors, facts, he generally dealt with facts. russia west on the swing of history, peter is with you romanov and sergei solovyov, today we will deal with the era of palace coups.

but, as history itself has proven, he did a bad job, because even peter himself, he had to choose the best from the worst, and in the end he did not leave an heir, so, in fact, from these times - an era began, so to speak , palace coups, well, actually, immediately after the death of peter, and indeed this time should in no case be considered without time - there are a lot of paradoxical things there, klyuchevsky wrote that during reign, he loved aphorisms, yes, during the reign of anna ianovna, the germans fell into russia like rubbish from a holey bag, it seems that the germans were really beron, there was asterman,

minikh, many others, many really came, so to speak, hunting, like we would say for a long ruble, but on the other hand, it was under anna that the salaries of foreign specialists were equalized. in the russian service, and russians, because there were already enough of our own, even the captains of ships from the twenty ships of the fleet of 13, respectively, were already russian at the time, as under peter the relationship was completely different, under elizabeth, well, a university was created, under elizabeth the first russian imperial theater was created, a tradition that we still honor today, and although it would seem, yes, elizabeth was a cheerful queen, she sings and has fun. there is just no order, as was the case in the wonderful work of alexei konstantinovich tolstoy, yes, the history of the russian state from gostomysl to timashev, remember, you and i just said, it means that immediately after peter there was a coup, meishikov, in fact, with the help

the guard places catherine on the throne, who was by no means the main contender for the throne, until that moment, but was peter’s grandson, in the male line, that means. then, after some time, minshkova is overthrown through intrigue, yes, long-armed, long-armed, yes, there was an intrigue of his own, so to speak, god bless her, which means he sits on the throne, finally, peter’s grandson, peter ii, he dies very quickly, again the problem, so to speak, is with the succession to the throne, and here, uh, here the so-called supreme council arises, that is, this is a group.

such a constitutional monarchy, conditionally speaking, it means that he proposes the weakest candidate of the possible ones, which was discussed, this is the candidacy of anna ianovna, who is sitting in the then provincial metava in kurland, they complain there all the time about life, yes they complain about life, in general certain conditions are put forward to her, she them signs, but returns and breaks these terms. ah and again with the help of the guard he reigns. after anna ianovna, if my memory serves me right, it means that anna ianovna, dying, left power in the hands of her formally distant

relative anna leopoldovna, ivan nevertheless, it means that it leaves power formally, as if in its hands, but at the same time as if legally, legitimately. the then infant ioan antonovich should become under the regency of beron, that is, the real power of beron, the real power will be removed, for a short time, not for long, from above him. minikh, and after some time, that means a new coup, elizaveta petrovna, and minikh goes to prison, which he himself, and he was an engineer, designed, so to speak, for beron, they even have evidence that they meet along the way , and look at each other coldly, one carriage goes to prison, the other goes to the palace. peter ii is on the throne, he is overthrown by catherine, the future

catherine ii. catherine is against her son, pavel, becoming the heir. and only after the death of catherine, paul comes to power, and he is also killed. that is, this whole chain demonstrates how violent the lawless are. in essence, that was the era, yes, i would still put the coup against paul i out of the equation, because unlike this, we will now talk about this, the clan nature of palace coups, which went from 1725 to 1762, the coup against paul was still different, because paul managed to anger an entire social stratum, not individual clans, paul really angered most of the nobility, who either participated in the coup or joyfully welcomed it, well, if you remember - so to speak, menshikov, well, the very beginning of the accession of catherine i, here foreigners

fully supported menshikov and catherine, although their influence was already quite large, well, after the era of peter the great, when there was a lot foreigners were invited, they were already approaching the throne, but in fact, they themselves were directly on this very first occasion. he had a very long career under a number of our rulers, he was valued both as

a diplomat and as a person knowledgeable in internal affairs. a very interesting episode for the characterization of starman himself, when there was a vacuum of power, at the same time, which means it was preminchikov when it loomed, so to speak , the figure of peter, the grandson, loomed, but he was not yet looking for different options, finally suggested the option of marrying this peter to the future empress elizaveta petorovna, who was his aunt, the age difference there was more than significant, the teenager peter was already an adult, that is, a person devoid of any special features at all. borders in general, well, for that time, especially

for the german principalities, a normal story for those, of course, that’s all. so, this same osterman, which means he was present at this meeting of the supreme leaders, he supported dmitry galitsin when he proposed the candidacy of anna ianovna, that’s when they started discussing conditions. to the fact that it is necessary to preserve the autocracy absolutely completely intact, well , first of all, he naturally wrote to

anna iannovna herself in metava, but in fact, he contributed, so to speak, to the guardsmen supporting anna iannovna, so anna iannovna, even having signed these all the conditions, returning to russia she knew perfectly well that she, that she had support, so she... came and tore all these apart, so we remember now, we have already remembered several times, in my opinion, the name of beron, but - with us everyone knows the word beronovschina. the very concept of beronovism, well, to some extent, for example, a completely respected, pre-revolutionary encyclopedic dictionary, ifron writes, according to osterman, a cabinet of ministers was established, in which all the initiative belonged to him, and his opinion almost always

prevailed , so osterman follows entirely. to attribute the actions of the cabinet at that time, this is not obirona, but ostarman, and here again there is such a paradox, in my opinion, this means that this is how columbus discovered america, and ameriga vispucci gave the name of america, which means here it turns out, if you believe the encyclopedic dictionary, it means that everyone is talking about beronovism, but he ruled russia, well, if you believe it. he received sanctions for his actions from biron, it was impossible to resist, he still had everything to do with the cabinet of ministers, it was actually the restored supreme privy council, it was just that

anna dissolved it for trying with conditions, but some kind of authority, such a central authority.

but when bestuzhev was recalled back to moscow, she then asked to return him a little, and so on and so on, but then biron took a place in her heart, that is, in this sense she was a very dependent person, so the expression beronovschina is not unfounded, if we move on to the next palace coup, then here the story is of course with anna leopoldovna. with the elimination of beron. anna leopoldovna was in russia from the age of five, from 1723, she was raised generally in russia. the woman was, in general , quite simple-minded, uh, unlike anna, completely non-cruel, uh, who, in general, appreciated and, apparently, loved her husband anton ulrich of brunswick. in august of the fortieth year, she gave birth to a son, ivan,

who was proclaimed anna ivanovna’s heir. beron, accordingly, was, as you already said, appointed. with her as regent, and of course, the young emperor, who was not yet a year old, accordingly, a political struggle inevitably broke out, here, of course, the figures of minich, a talented engineer, an associate of peter, come to the fore, although in his later years, in my opinion , since the twenty-first year he has been in russian service, played a big role in construction of the ladosh canal, the most important, most important engineering structure. during anna’s reign, it was beron who pushed him out of the intrigues, he really wanted to get into the cabinet of ministers, he really wanted to, they didn’t let him there, they gave him the kind of field marshal that he also really wanted to get and sent him to fight

the turks. how he fought with the turks is a separate story, he later called himself the pillar... of the russian empire, this is the pillar of the russian empire, in the end, in general, he put a huge number of soldiers in vain during his campaigns in the crimea, during the wars with turkey, the war with turkey, respectively, in the moldavian principalities, in general, the commander was clearly unlucky. kersonez tauride, the revived cradle of russian orthodoxy, a land that remembers the baptism of prince vladimir, his glorious exploits, the beginning of the great. history of the russian state, in honor of the anniversary of the baptism of russia, the opening ceremony of the new complex. on the first.

the soviet union is no more, now you can earn a lot of money in a completely legal way. have you heard anything about the program? oil for food? do you have any idea how big it is? but is there not enough oil in russia? this is a completely different level. oleg and i decided to get married. yes, you were accepted. master's degree from new york university and they gave me a scholarship, it's just that you and i live different lives, i can't do this, it's hard for me, then you're leaving me like this now, you recognize this woman, i think you know what happened in iraq, and for us this means that all foreign intelligence services are becoming more active there, hello, i won’t interfere, of course, what do you think, he figured you out, i hope not yet, i’ve never cheated on you before. no, what about you? i'm not married, i studied at your university, but not a single professor helped me make a career. hello, trader from monday on

the first, do you understand what you have done, how have you not seen an american spy in front of your nose for so many years? this is a historical podcast russia-west on the swing of history, let's figure it out. with the era of palace coups, the sacredness of royal power during these palace coups was violated, well listen, what kind of sacredness of royal power can we talk about when the guards stand at the royal bedchamber, in the royal palace, they see all these intrigues, they see the favorites, they see in general the bed secrets of the empress and emperors, and of course they have a different attitude to this, they begin to perceive themselves differently, as a result, a situation developed... when the nobility, the metropolitan nobility, first of all the metropolitan nobility, of course, began to realize that the rulers were the same people as themselves, if we follow

klyuchevsky, his dating of the palace coups, the last catherine's, well, here , too, the influence is absolutely foreign, english, it's just that in this case, she closely communicated with the english envoy henbury williamson and... and she received money, and he gave her advice, she thanked him for these advice, for help, that’s the only thing that the overall result of the reign of catherine i, it is positively assessed by our national history, therefore, in general, they prefer not to remember how she came to power, and she also came to power with foreign help, so to speak, not without influence. from the outside , catherine’s coup, of course, there can be found a lot of arguments for the fact that it was natural, because peter ii was

a person of little popularity and little sympathy for - in general for the russian people and certainly for the army and the nobility, especially since and catherine’s personality was also enormous. significance, because, well, yes, the orlovs, dashkovo, so to speak, they are undoubtedly important participants in all these events, but first of all, this is , of course, the personality of catherine herself. there is one such a little-known episode of this whole revolutionary history, which means that before the coup, when the conspiracy was already being prepared, everything was being prepared, which means that catherine was living in peterhof at that time, and

it will become known that the conspiracy may fail, well, in short, god he knows what was going on in catherine’s head at that moment, but of the two options, run away or

vice versa... in fact, they were rescued by a simple peasant cart, they got on it and drove on, only then they were met by another orlov brother, grigory, they moved into crew and got to barracks of the izmailovsky regiment, and then everything went, so to speak, more or less according to plan, so this is an incident, it is also very important in all these historical events,

well done, of whom there are not very many in the head, while actually preparing for this coup, we need to remember paul, who, in fact, in 1797, when he came to power, he adopted a new law on succession to the throne, correcting the mistake. peter the great, all the conditions necessary for sitting on the throne were spelled out there, in particular, for example, there was it is indicated that only orthodox christians can count on this throne, he prepared it and prepared it together with his wife, by the way, he prepared it while he was still a tsarevich, because he was deprived of the throne himself, and therefore for him this topic was ...

medieval knighthood traditions, this is at the end of the 18th century, in general, he managed to arouse the hatred of not only individual officials, generals, not a couple of guards regiments, but most of the nobility, as germaine destal later wrote, in my opinion, that in russia unlimited monarchy, limited only by a noose, and so all russian emperors will then remember about this noose the era of palace coups and specifically the death

of paul separately, they will remember very well. this will leave an imprint on the direction of all subsequent rulers of russia throughout the nineteenth and partly even the beginning of the 20th century; here is their relationship with the nobility, and this , to a certain extent, it seems to me, played a cruel joke, because the authorities, being afraid of the nobility, the imperial power, realizing, for example, the need to first abolish serfdom, then the need to limit noble ownership of land, she never agreed to this, fearing that... including, including the fact that the nobles might again carry out the same operation, which was spent with paul i. the era of palace coups, well, these, in my opinion, are completely interesting times. i guess i 'll finish here. these interesting times were mainly for the top of society, and a significant part of the population still did not actually notice them. ah, and it’s true

thanks to the revolutions. in russia , imposture again flourished, as in the 17th century, in the 18th century, and the idea that emperors themselves do not necessarily die also appeared thanks to palace coups. someone to help, yes, today we talked about the era of palace coups, pyotr romanov and sergei solovyov were with you, it was a podcast russia and the west on the swing of history, study history with us, you can see all episodes of the podcast russia and the west on the swing of history watch on the channel one website. a special analytical issue is on air games. we will talk now with alexander mikhailovich babakov, deputy chairman of the state duma. greetings, very grateful that you

took the time. hello. i actually wanted to talk to you, i hope to talk more about the economy, but i have to ask about the most striking event of the day. this is an exchange that just took place involving russia, the united states and germany, an exchange of 26 prisoners. your opinion? i believe that this step itself suggests that, despite the entire situation associated with the aggravation of relations, absolutely on all fronts, contacts are still saved, topics that are interesting and very important are saved. for both sides, and i am very glad that at least this kind of exchange demonstrates the readiness of the two sides to dialogue, to find a solution and thereby , well, influence the processes that

surround us, and of course, purely humanitarian we are not discussing the aspect when people who, for one reason or another, ended up on the territory of another state in the form of prisoners will return to the family... the fbi, it did not have a diplomatic immunity, an exchange was also organized, and president reagan himself proposed to convey to

the soviet country that he would not use this exchange for any political or propaganda purposes, he said: this is not only and not so much out of respect for the soviet union, because he understood, as you just mentioned, that in general, as long as sovereign states exist, as long as they have verbal relations with each other, such situations can arise, and if you want to resolve them promptly, you use them in propaganda purposes, but this is a disservice to those,

it is not for nothing that they cited as an example the period when relations between the ussr and the usa were at a completely different level, but then there were other figures in the political arena, and today we are forced to admit that western politicians have become smaller , unfortunately, unfortunately, for everyone, not only for us, they live for today, sometimes not understanding how important their steps are for the circumstances connecting the countries and how this... can influence what is happening around them, because in fact such kind of statements already, apparently the actions discredit the very status of these politicians, since well, they turn into people who are very difficult

to trust not only secrets, but even the most, perhaps not so significant, but important decisions for the given period, this is a further discreditation of this kind of politicians, unfortunately -

this is your very interesting statement about swift and the organization of some, as i understand it, analogue under the auspices of brix, tell us what you think about this and when do you think this could actually happen? you know, here it is necessary to note precisely the positive moment in the work of the financial block of our country, connected with the fact that an analogue of swift has been developed for quite a long time, and this, of course, is simply for the needs of today, we understand

perfectly well that this is not the only thing we must today there is a whole range of solutions to problems, but it is very important because it offers banks a secure system that allows them to make payments between different financial institutions of different countries in real time and thus to guarantee not only confidentiality, but the effectiveness of these payments, and the fact that this exists in reality and the fact that a number of countries have already... expressed their readiness to join this means that they see in this instrument a fairly well-developed and effective mechanism for making mutual payments. not only this, but since you asked such a question, i want to say that in the near future we are ready to extend the influence of this or the use of this mechanism to those countries that consider this possible, i think that the countries who want to join brix, and not just brix countries, may well use. just for mutual settlements, you expect that

the united states and its allies will maximally dissuade countries from joining this initiative, i am sure of this, they will have maximum influence on all countries that will connect to this system, since they are now doing the same the most connected simply with payments from various banks, various states to russia and vice versa, we understand perfectly well that this... is due to the fact that they realize that the so-called dominance of the dollar, well, we must sort of understand that this is like a slogan, yes, in essence, this means that the area where the mechanisms ensuring the normal functioning of the dollar is narrowing, they cease to function absolutely throughout territory, this territory is slowly beginning to move into the part where relations are being formed, either bilateral or multilateral, including using the russian mechanism. according to calculations, another

question that i wanted to raise with you is the question of discount rates, let’s listen to one very interesting statement on this matter, i didn’t see such a surge in negative assessments in networks even when the svo began, and the rate also soared up, then people reacted to this with understanding, they saw that this is a natural reaction, and in general a lot of things happened again for us back then; current actions are creating. a lot of questions, what questions? well, look, today we understand perfectly well that the past 2 years have proven the ineffectiveness of sanctions, including including in the financial sphere against russia, and this was due not only to the fact that we were , as it were, ready for this, but also, first of all , because, in my opinion, there was an overestimation of the capabilities of the west itself in its tools, in its tools, in the potential of its tools in underestimating the survivability of our economy when we...

because it seems to me that there is either a certain misunderstanding here, or, well, i’m not afraid of this word, well, cunning in assessing those events that take place in ours as overheating, and this very dangerous trend economy, let's look at what overheating as such should be like, and indeed it is a condition. economy, when industrial production has reached such a scale that it already significantly exceeds demand and it is practically powerless to absorb the commodity mass that has been created in the economy, right? we were taught this in political economy textbooks and there were examples like this, but the current situation in russia does not correspond to this concept in any way, in general the word overheating to the current state of tasks facing our economy - this is, well , just from a different area, today, on the contrary, we understand perfectly well that our economy

is not underestimated, in fact, today the tasks facing our absolutely all segments of the economy... means one thing: we need to increase production at a pace that will last , our country has not seen for almost 10 years, and this is primarily due to the fact that not only many product manufacturers left, but also many product manufacturers stopped supplying these products to our market, more moreover, the country faces the task of updating and modernizing production, which in turn again creates a colossal impetus in those industries that can create machines, equipment, spare parts, and so on, when... when we talk about the prevailing role today the military-industrial complex, we understand that production there is growing exponentially today, but they also provide an incentive to absolutely, well , a huge number of industries that supply the components of what ultimately turns into military-industrial complex products, all this means that today we are only at the stage unwinding of the economic model, therefore

there can be no talk of any overheating, which means that the arguments or assessment by central banks of the situation associated with overheating is not entirely correct. secondly, you and i must see that one of the main aspects that is being cited today by the financial bloc is the labor shortage, or we say that unemployment is at an extremely low level and there is a labor shortage , i admit that there is a labor shortage, but it is physical, in fact, if you look at it realistically, our problem is not that we do not have workers, we have a skew in the structure of the labor force, and we understand perfectly well that we lack qualified labor... there are directions for finding and forming a solution to this problem, and this again suggests that there are no grounds for such a tight monetary policy, and moreover, you and i must understand that today we are in a situation where the costs associated with paying such a high

interest rate fall on the shoulders of producers, well , it is clear that they shift this burden on prices, and we are accelerating. inflation, and i still dare to say that, to a large extent, inflationary processes are associated not with the fact that we are experiencing overheating of the economy, but with the fact that this kind of tight monetary and credit policy leads to higher prices for those goods which are happening today, in other words, you question the main postulate of the central bank, that the discount rate needs to be raised. in order to avoid very serious inflation, you say that this is the opposite sign, yes, this is exactly the policy that will be stimulate inflation processes, because in the current situation, what is inflation, we have already repeatedly encountered this understanding, this phenomenon has a definition, although we disagree with the central

bank here, the central bank believes that inflation is when there is a lot of money, and we believe that inflation is when there are few goods, so by producing... new goods , demand will catch up, it may even outstrip at some stage, naturally, consumption, introducing new goods to the market, but this is a limited time, and we understand today , that the growth rates that were set last year and today even significantly exceed this, this is just the beginning, our country deserves for our gdp to grow at a rate of 10 percent or more, and this is a reality, today our potential corresponds precisely to this growth, you know . economist, besides being the deputy chairman of the state duma, do you have a personal dialogue with the central bank? there is nothing personal, but in the part in which we are placed by legislation, well, in those relations that exist, this is the report of the central bank, this protection of certain

provisions for central banks, we periodically meet and communicate, but here you understand, we do not consider that there are antagonistic contradictions between us, we are on... to build a sovereign economy that looks far ahead, we must go do everything possible , so that our front does not need

anything, but not only this goal and not so much this goal, we must make the russian economy such that in the future no one will ever think or desire to carry out military aggression against us, those disagreements, the concerns that you have with the central bank extend to the government's financial unit. in some part, but we must understand that today we still see not at all a lack of coordination between the financial block of the government and the rest of the government, but rather between the central bank, which fundamentally significantly influences the economic situation, because look, the task set by the central bank is to achieve inflation at a level of 4% per annum, we can say that this is what we’ll call it a noble goal, but it is but... the central bank, we aim to solve only one

problem, but no, it doesn’t happen in the economy, in the economy everything is too connected, so today, speaking about the financial block of the government, i would like to say that in many issues, the financial block of the government generally supports the efforts of the government, this is connected not only with the search for a financing mechanism, subsidizing the interest rate of the central bank, this is a huge job, this is... issues related to how to treat the sale of foreign currency proceeds, you you know, there was a whole story there, in the end the president made a fundamental decision, there was now a relaxation, but it doesn’t matter, in this case the position of the financial bloc quite clearly supports the position of the government as a whole, then we have to look at what the activities of the central bank are in connection with the financial block, of course, these are connected things, well, it’s very difficult to break it all off, but the key today is still... in my opinion , is that we need to fully understand, here we are, we’re talking to you about import substitution in general, but import substitution has, well, a definition, i would

even start with the fact that it is very important for us not only to create our own real sector of the economy, the production of means, production for the production of means of production, but the main thing is also to create or destroy or destroy or replace in matters of imported meaning of life. that liberal views always carry certain limitations, for example, we often heard that this came from outside, came from the policy of the international monetary fund, with which we had close relations with financial institutions, that we could fill our economy with money supply, well, that is, this is living matter, in connection with our gold and foreign exchange reserves, but a situation arose when gold and foreign exchange reserves were generally confiscated, certain reasons arose for their lack of demand . but we were faced with a situation that the economy could still develop, and there was a period when the government got its hands on a fairly wide range of filling the money

supply of our economy, it immediately received result, we have colossal growth, at the end of last year there was 3.6% gdp growth, the beginning of this year was already half 5%, and this suggests that the policy that today is connected with the fact that we must change the views associated with the arrival from certain westerners... russia must clearly define its understanding of what sovereignty is, and sovereignty means that we can understand our own goals and formulate them independently, without prompting. we have an understanding of which of our own resources we can use to ensure the implementation of our own tasks in the interests of our own people,

these are not slogans, this is a normal explanation of sovereignty, when we talk about economic sovereignty, this means that we have a sovereign financial model, which is based on a sovereign financial unit, that is, a currency that plays the role of only the calculation function, both accumulative and investment, all this today, unfortunately, cannot be imposed on the ruble. the ruble today, which fluctuated quite recently and which made leaps in connection there with in relation to other currencies, could not turn out to be not only from the point of view of accumulation is interesting, but the investment component, so we understand that the adjustment of financial monetary policy and the financial system in general is very serious, and the last question, you know, i lived in america for many years and something i also learned there, maybe something...

if i understood correctly, your communist colleagues wanted to increase the tax on wealthy people, but not on billionaires, but simply on wealthy people to 30%, which alexander mikhailovich would have been, according to compared to what these people paid 3 years ago, an increase of 100%. i don't know

if you will agree with me. what the communists proposed sounded attractive in the name of social justice, but in practice it was dangerous, so the government objected to it. well, you know, here i would immediately agree with you that the government’s proposals, carried out and put into practice, were very balanced in nature, and this balance, it consisted in some aspects, but firstly, they were subject to

a sign of fairness, fairness, that after all we must understand... and do everything to ensure that the poor pay less and the rich pay more, but we have always operated with numbers, and i am very grateful to the government that they were not just given or implemented proposals, but there were, they were accompanied by a certain digital set, showing that such steps would affect a limited circle of taxpayers, this was important, because we understand perfectly well that the main task was still under the brand, under the auspices the topic of justice is not... to frighten away or not to destroy the emerging mechanism that we have received in recent years, and by the way, and not to undermine the social unity of the country, trust, of course, and trust, look, the topic of the self-employed, as it was promised that in for a long time there will be no changes in relation to the self-employed, this is what happened, there was a clear red line, the fact that we do not touch the taxation of the self-employed has passed right away, secondly, we have clearly recorded

that people employed in the special military the operation is also taking place in... will ensure its removal from gray schemes, when the majority of people understand that paying taxes legally and legally receiving their salaries and thereby ensuring their future should become the norm of life, and today, when this has been formed, this kind of adjustment cannot destroy the entire system as a whole; as for the sizes, i would really like to emphasize here that they are really so consistent and

are accompanied, among other things, by changes in taxation. for profit, but also not it’s critical that if we compare taxes with this, our taxes, russian taxes with the taxes of other countries, we will say that yes, quite effectively, for the benefit of business, maintaining its confidence that the state is not destroying, but is cooperating with it. i am very glad to hear this, because russia has great successes at the front in ukraine, and of course, these successes will continue to increase. it is very important that we move in the right direction on the domestic front, and what you say in this regard is very encouraging, thank you very much thank you for your work for your time, i hope to see you again soon on our air, thank you, thank you, we’re leaving for advertising, we’ll be back in just a few minutes, how did you

find me, listen, well, i’m a cop, i didn’t go around like that, he maybe... he won’t have time to spoil it, you’re an investigator for particularly important cases, for what purpose did you come to us for a special task, you came back, well done, but you have to.

a well-thought-out option for escaping abroad, well, of course, i would run in, what will choose the moles, you had no preparation, sooner or later you will be identified anyway, and this is fatal danger, or do you have a second very question, be careful, i am always careful, major, find the head of the security service, have him urgently report to the control room and mobilize all our employees, everyone... you can, the whole version is going to hell , the man with a stutter suddenly speaks like cicero, i really hope that you don’t have to blame yourself for not wanting to help us, you are a very good

shooter, hello, colonel kostenko, confrontation. alexey alexandrovich maslov, director there is a big game on the air, now we will talk with the institute of asia-africa to truly outstanding specialists in china on global yoga.

accepts, does not announce any kind of retaliatory sanctions, does not expel, perhaps, american businessmen, did not create some kind of nightmare for american business, in china there are now more than 400 large chinese and american companies, not counting small ones, why is he doing nothing? did, but because china never acts quickly, that is, does not respond blow to blow, it acts in a certain historical horizon, forward backwards, in this sense, china, in my opinion, is a very serious change. what i see simply from within china is that it is beginning to realize that the main direction of the us strike will, of course, be against china, not even against russia, it is obvious that there will be an attempt after some time, and you can,

as they say, check my words, to tear russia away from china, that is, for example, by proposing to ease sanctions against russia, creating a more comfortable situation, but of course, without lifting any sanctions, because china is the only country that... can really challenge the united states, not even the financial system, technology, and of course what the united states is doing today, creating the strengthening of okos, strengthening the three. the united states is bringing japan there in order to essentially limit the actions of the united states, this is a 100% military alliance, it is not by chance that it is called the asian nato, although of course it is far from the scale of nato, but in general it is a military alliance, there are quasi-military alliances, then there are those who formally talk about economics, but at the same time it is obvious. in the military

sphere, these are, for example, australia, japan, usa, sort of trilateral, there is a strengthening of the us presence, for example, in the philippines, just the other day blinken visited the philippines and promised to donate 500 million dollars to strengthen the military cooperation of the philippine military forces, there is a re-equipment of american bases in japan, which is literally now underway military bases, i mean, that is, of course it 's id'. that an encirclement is being built against china, well, in the literal sense, and this will only be the beginning, because i am sure that conflicts between china and japan will be stimulated, china and india, they exist anyway, but they are in such a dormant state, they have developed historically, they cannot be resolved quickly, and china now, in my opinion, understands the complexity and depth of the issue, but unfortunately china... not so

can quickly change policy for one simple reason: there are also discussions going on inside china and sometimes it seems to us that sidingpin is such a literal dictator who ordered everything and began to carry it out, no, there are discussions on economic issues, on political issues, and not discussions to what to whom closer to the usa or to russia, here the choice has been made, let’s be honest, and of course, china works more with russia than with the usa, but the question is.

we think that if they managed to inflict a strategic defeat on russia and china allowed them to do this, then china would not receive any gratitude, on the contrary, it would become the next target, this is an absolutely accurate opinion, it is now becoming, let’s say , prevailing. there is another very important point, because we sometimes trivialize chinese opinions by saying that we are talking about a chinese person.

what was done correctly, because this, this was the first war in which chinese volunteers participated, it allowed us to recognize ourselves as a military power, allowed us to understand what products to produce, how it generally restructures our economy, that is, often into a military actions that today seem very critically painful are perceived tomorrow as an impetus for new economic development.

henry kissinger, as you know, considered it very important for the united states that america had better relations with china and russia than they would have had with each other, but at the same time kisinger always had convictions, almost until the end of his days, he had a feeling. that a real rapprochement between russia and china is impossible, partly because they not only have serious differences in the past, but he said repeatedly, wrote more than once that the chinese treat russia with contempt, most recently,

shortly before his death, his , it seems to me that the approach changed somewhat, and he began to say that... what under american partly due to pressure, and partly simply due to positive experience in cooperation with russia, a more respectful attitude towards russia arose in china, is this true? this is absolutely true, moreover, indeed theoretically, just theoretically, the contradictions between russia and china could be simply insurmountable, more than 4.00 km of common border, a lot... china should have more disputes with russia than, for example, with india, there is a small piece with japan, where there is a small island, but it turned out that due to enormous pressure from the united states,

the situation has changed, this is just a paradox, when the quantity of pressure turned into quality, and look, it turns out that today we think, this is this... which praises china there in african countries in the countries of southeast asia, it is exactly the same may fall off. over the past almost 40 years, russia has never changed its policy towards china. this is a very important point.

over the past 40 years, russia has never posed any threat to china. and now china is now rethinking this situation, after the united states is its best friend, biggest trade. huge technologies, a colossal number of american enterprises in china, trump’s first visit was absolutely wonderful in china, all this collapsed in a few years according to surveys by the research social sociological center, if in 2000, in my opinion, the number of americans who loved and hated china was 14-15 was divided 50/50 approximately .

both against russia and against china, this is true, moreover, methods of information sources for processing consciousness, they have expanded noticeably, this is not only colossal.

already understood russia, yes, there are brilliant specialists, but still there are few of them. now the main question in order to strengthen our interaction with china and china, with russia, is training people who deeply, professionally understand how we think. many years ago in america there were professors who studied russia, the soviet union, who not only knew something about...

like a western country, that if you press it a little, intimidate it a little, and stand on their hind legs, here they are, they there was no need to study the history of russia, because they have it it was already in the brain in the bones that this was the country that in 812 stalingrad itself burned vaska.

as serious as previously feared, what do you think? i think that the main fear of the united states,

in contrast to japan, was that china, as they say, could not be bought, well, a completely different country and a different situation, and secondly, the united states had illusions, and many books have been written about this, about that with the development of the economy in china, the liberal model of this economy will also develop, because everyone said, well, how can it be if you have a huge amount of money, a huge market, and you you try... to control from beginning to end, either the market will fall, or you will have to liberalize it, it turned out that china came up with a completely different model, not the matrix model, literally hadulous, that was in the usa, when at the top level there is really a very tough control, but in the form of small medium-sized enterprises there is huge competition, more terrible, tougher than in the usa, they said that the communist party is an absolutely outdated type of power, not just.

provinces right up to the party central committee, these are brilliantly educated people, very flexible, very good understanding the situation, and the higher the level, the better these officials understand the situation, that is, it turned out that china suddenly proposed the model that the americans failed to grasp in their consciousness, it is too out of the norm, by the way, the same is true in relation to russia, in this sense, the reaction to this model and the inability to grasp it is alarmism. this is an attempt to be afraid to scare everyone else, because it is necessary, but on the other hand, to underestimate the potential, right, because it takes time to realize, that’s like, let's scare everyone now, step back a little and see what we can do about it, because in fact, china hasn't even turned around yet, just like the us attack on china hasn't turned around, everyone thinks that

this won't happen, i i don’t want to be a bad predictor here, but unfortunately... the first step will obviously be taken by the americans in relation to china, clearly not china, in relation to the united states, the second step and this step will be hostile, you think, definitely hostile, and it doesn’t matter who it will be, will it be republicans or democrats, will it be in the next iteration or through one or two iterations, it doesn’t matter, because the idea of ​​the united states is that there is simply a phenomenally big enemy, and it must be suppressed, and as before they fought against communism, in general with abstract communism. now they will fight china precisely as if from a myth with a mytheme like this, this myth about a hostile china, which was created back in the trump administration, maybe even earlier, this famous book death from china, navara, this is the same idea lives within american society, it is realized

already in the actions of politicians, so, in principle , china now understands this, so china... is looking for a position on how to make interaction with other countries, including russia, not just trade, but in-depth scientific, technical, military, we’ll see, we’ll see how things progress, alexey alexandrovich, thank you for this very interesting conversation, thank you for your time, we hope to see you again on our air soon, thank you, we’re leaving for advertising, we’ll be back in just a few minutes. it was a time of big ideas, it was a time of great big and different dreams, soviet films that were filmed at vdnkh gave an idea of ​​the power and beauty of this object,

it was, as you know, somewhere in a fairy tale, in the thirty-fifth year the project was approved and...

from monday on the first, you i must contact him and give him a new task on the same object, get him out of iraq, get him out of the game, there’s a big game on the air, now we ’ll talk on skype with channel one correspondent in washington, georgy.

that this exchange could have taken place much earlier if it had been done by professionals from the american country and intelligence services, and

political games were not played, including by biden, unfortunately, some families allowed prisoners to use their relatives and children for these games, instead of saying, here... "we need an exchange, we we want it to happen as quickly as possible, what are your ideas, what are our needs? instead, they tried as much as possible to say that russia did not have the right to detain these people, in general, this kind of propaganda, it seems to me, was due to primarily those prisoners who would otherwise could have been exchanged." earlier, i don’t know what you think about this, well, you know, what you named is for you...