"my marinka and i almost broke up right before the wedding, because of him, and if i fall in love with you again, it's yours, do with it as you wish, throw it away if you want, wear it if you want, hide it if you want, he pestered you again yesterday, don't disgrace the family, kirill, i want to give you some advice, as an experienced womanizer, don't pester a woman if she doesn't want it herself, you 're ruining your life and hers, what will happen to you now, what will they do to you, these are not just words, if necessary, i'll kill you, i would n't throw around such words, you'll kick"? i'll put you in jail, for what? we will always find an article. i will not survive if you cheat on me. i can not live without you. premiere, from monday on the first. i can not live without you. i will wait. this is a historical podcast. we continue the conversation about pyotr yakovlevich, chadayev. against the position.

where he analyzes in sufficient detail, he writes himself, that it turned out to be a huge letter, analyzes his point of view, i will not quote this letter in full, although it is very worth reading, because from my point of view, alexander sergeevich here, from the point of view of historical accuracy, is not only from my point of view, was more right, of course, than pyotr yakovlevich, he writes, as for thoughts, then you know that i do not agree with you in everything, there is no doubt that the schism of the division of churches separated us from the rest of europe, that ... did not take part

in any of the great events that shook it, but we had our own special purpose: this is russia, this is its vast space, absorbed the mongol invasion, the tatars did not dare to cross our western borders leaving us in the rear, they retreated to their deserts, the tatars, there is in mind, and christian civilization was saved, to achieve this goal we had to lead a completely special existence, which , while leaving us christians, made us completely alien to the christian world, so that by our martyrdom, the energetic development of catholic europe was freed from any hindrance, that is, pushkin here looks at the role of russia in the pan-european context. you say that the source from which we drew christianity was impure, and they talk here about byzantium. pushkin objects: "oh, my friend, wasn't jesus christ himself born a jew, and wasn't jerusalem a philistine ? the gospel of this, isn't it amazing to me. we took the gospel and the tradition from the greeks, but the spirit of childish pettiness, but not the spirit of childish pettiness and strife. that is, he denies chiodaev the rightness here too. he did not

limit himself to criticizing chiodaev's pre-petrine history. and he writes: "as for our historical insignificance, i absolutely cannot agree with you. the warriors of oleg and svyatoslav, even the feudal strife. is this not the life full of seething imagination of ardent aimless activity, which distinguishes the youth of all nations. the tatar invasion is a sad and great spectacle. the awakening of russia, the development of its power, its movement towards unity, towards russian unity, of course. both ivans. the majestic drama that has begun. is all this really not history, but only a pale , half-forgotten dream, and peter the great, who is one whole history, and catherine ii, who placed russia on the threshold of europe, and alexander, who brought you. i am far from i admire everything i see around me, how writers irritate me, as a person with prejudices, i am offended, this is speaking about modern times. but i swear on my honor, i would not want to change my homeland for anything in the world to have another history, except for the history of our ancestors, as god gave it to us. and the lines are brilliant in fact, and here.

it is not, they called him crazy, but these are not some kind of statements of some holy fool, as in the old days, and this is not some kind of public outrageousness, the point is that this was written absolutely seriously, this such hard-won thoughts, the potential itself is very important here, and russia has enormous potential, so in any case , here... you can't look at just today,

but this very premise of chadayev's, that in the past and today in the future, it doesn't work, in fact. it was necessary to react to him somehow, well, nikolai, as you already said, reacted in his usual manner, he summed up the scandal, taking into account the painful state of the unfortunate man, the government in its concern orders him not to leave provide him with free medical care at home. in general, he was under this house arrest, they let him out daily only for one walk, and otherwise he was forbidden to write and leave the house, this continued for a whole year, and a doctor came to him daily with a police master

to examine his condition, by the way, in the era of...