mom made arrangements with kirill and he will take us to the bus station, and from there by regular bus to the river port, what time is the ship? i will rock you with that permission. forever, my star, clear, as you are from me yes, we got to know each other, we realized that in the edge doubly, a beautiful girl.

listen to me carefully once again stick your nose to her, i will hurt you, it is written on the bottom that she is your property, right, well then let her decide for herself, she has already decided everything, yes, and are you sure, stop, stop,

i will not fall out of love, i just know it, only please, please, no stupid suspicions, okay, forgive me, please, let's go, well, guys, it's okay, don't be afraid, go for it, come here, let everything work out for you, yes, yes, for you, for us. well, thank you, you're a wonderful gentleman, and you're the most beautiful teacher in the world, come visit sometime, thank you, right now you can, now you can't, it's already late, what are we, we young people need to sleep every other day, it's a wonderful idea, but i like to get enough sleep. what are you doing? i'm making

my childhood dream come true. i'm finally an adult a man, i have the right to kiss the woman i love. pavel, never do that. 100 rubles. right now. 100 rubles. that's three of your salaries. get out of here. oh, mother, take it, natasha, come on, feed mother, mom, i'll cook everything, thank you, got up, oh, you bet, marin, what are you doing, borya, you need to get diesel fuel somewhere, where are you going to get it, diesel fuel, mom, dad, we're going to the city tomorrow, why, a month before exams, a friend.

invited, remember, we met in the city, she has her own apartment, invited me to stay, we'll prepare together, so don't cook at home, you eat, come on, and she has a huge library, we 'll go to college, take some teaching aids, as if it's more convenient, well if it's more convenient, go ahead, go ahead, you like to send your child away from home, what do you mean, he wants to, let him go, not to the ends of the earth, the city is nearby, oh, fox, it's scary to let him go and you can't not let him go, and how long will he study there? at college? 5 years, then straight home to the village. well go, hitch a ride? to the district center hitch a ride, and then a bus? to the district center? we'll take him there, tomorrow i'm sending a truck for desks to school, so it will take him there. well, go get ready, so i... got everything ready, i feel it,

write, girls, if there are problems, please, come back home, okay, yes, and you check the goods. and then last year, okay, the year before last they sent such junk, well of course i'll keep an eye on it, there were no others, and what, yes, nothing, let's go, girls, my heart is restless, carefully, and where are you going? the cabin, okay, well, don't forget to eat soup, she decided to whiten the money, write, all snakes, fogs

in the advancing fields.

some dreamers in ukraine, in kiev, on the west may consider it something that russia, excuse me, will fall for, and we are talking about a game, they want to put us in a situation where we will fall for something, something that

suits zelensky, vladimir alekseevich, we won’t, well, we are not a fish that takes the bait, so to speak, that’s the first thing. if we are serious, unfortunately, war and peace are natural states of humanity, now, despite the fact that russia has been and remains one of the key powers that has always been committed to peace initiatives, now is absolutely not the time and it is not the time to implement these very initiatives, this is one, two, especially to implement them under the dictation of the west or , god forbid, the kiev regime, this is definitely not what we need. the next point...

and we have proposed them throughout history, but the further we go, the more complex and rigid the formulas become, which is quite logical, because after all the adventures, especially the terrorist ones on the territory of the russian federation, we are certainly not talking about just taking some bait from the west, it is this was not discussed, only dreamers, who are in a completely illusory world, especially in the west, they could talk about this, they are generally in a world of illusions, they do not correlate what they want with what really exists, that is, what is desired is really, unfortunately, increasingly diverging today, yes, in the west and in this...

i completely agree, you started with the issues of war and peace, now the issues of war and peace are more acute than ever in relations between russia and the west, and in the literal sense of this word, because the west, which sees that it is not possible to defeat russia in a hybrid war, is playing at escalation. and a double escalation: firstly, the west is participating in the kiev regime's attempt to invade the kursk region , this is being carried out with western support and western participation, and this is an escalation, no doubt, and although the west denies its participation, for us it is truly indisputable. moreover, the west is playing at another escalation, this very invasion of the kursk region is being used as a pretext to finally achieve what kiev has been saying for quite some time now that... that it is necessary to strike with western long-range missiles to strategic depth at the internationally

recognized territory of russia, and here the united states is playing, well, if you like, cat and mouse, that is, on the one hand they say, no, we do not give such permission, yes, on the other hand, they are obviously testing russia's reaction, the degree of severity of russia's reaction to these provocative statements that kiev makes every day, because the kiev regime is not only on the west's participation in the kursk adventure area, but that

practical consequences for the west itself are already occurring. the practical consequences of what is not an accusation but an obvious fact are being observed, and our american colleagues know what we are talking about. washington's escalatory course is becoming increasingly provocative. it seems that our colleagues have cast aside the remnants of common sense and believe that they are allowed to do anything. the consequences could be much more severe than those they... pretend that the west wants to avoid

excessive escalation, but in reality it is slyness. the west does not want to avoid escalation, the west, in russian, is asking for it, and it seems to me that this is already obvious to everyone. the americans clearly associate these conversations about the third world war as something that can, that, that can. including the doctrine of the use of nuclear weapons, which, by the way, is now being clarified,

which american officials are very well aware of. well, lavrov spoke about the impossibility of a regional nuclear war, because it is the europeans who are already officially calling for the use of appropriate long-range strikes. let me remind you that the british prime minister officially supports this, borrell, the head of the european diplomacy, officially supports this. indeed, this kurdish gambit, when it sacrificed troops on the line of combat contact, especially in the donetsk direction, pursued two tasks, two major tasks that were designated, one of them is the capture of strategic facilities , possibly nuclear blackmail, the second is precisely long-range missiles, because

if this adventure had succeeded, then, for example, f16 with these missiles could be applied much closer to...

to talk about the fact that in fact ukraine, having failed to implement this scenario, suffers a strategic defeat, because the situation has changed radically not in favor of ukraine, those who sponsored it, but the british, let's say, warmongers, they still have illusions that they will still be able to somehow provoke russia

into precisely this scenario, but we also understand that this game...

and that we have done something that will allow the west, as they believe, to change the chess board, it won't work, we will achieve our goals and we will achieve our goals in the way the president said, which will best meet the interests of, firstly, the savings of our people, and secondly, the protection of those people

whom the fascist regime in kiev declared terrorists, whom it deprived of basic rights, including the right to their religion, to faith, to language, and much more, that's why they won't be able to provoke us. andrei andreevich, pay attention, on the one hand, very tough statements, including including an appeal to the nuclear doctrine and its changes, in response to tests, yes, provocations

that are acting there incognito, but directly, and what zelensky spoke about directly in a number of his speeches, including abroad, they realize that

their own ukrainian resource has long been exhausted, the ukrainian armed forces are essentially on an iv drip conducting these feverish actions, the americans see this impulse from kiev, they see and read that, of course , the ukrainians are counting on the fact that the american armed forces will directly begin... take part in this and understand that they are not interested in this, they need ukraine as a tool, as a proxy tool, which they could use as long as possible. and this has caused some puzzled reactions in the western media, in the expert community, in some major editorials, which ask the question, what is the meaning, the strategic meaning of this kursk impromptu, we do not see any strategic goals, but the resource.

states, this conflict of interests of kiev and washington, it is quite remarkable, and we we will observe how this develops during the american elections, where there are symptoms of... differences of opinion regarding the ukrainian strategy, we will see how this matter will really develop, but it makes no sense to rely on this, it is also necessary to consistently, confidently and firmly implement our own strategy, achieve our strategic goals, and it is evident from the intonation and the way our highest political, military and diplomatic leadership acts that the entire complexity of the situation is recognized, it is clear that our strategy looks like the most advantageous in this situation. well, indeed, the interests of washington and kiev are far from identical. kiev is interested in involving the united states in a direct war against russia. the united states

is not interested in this, of course, they would like this war to retain its hybrid character, but at the same time the united states sees that russia is winning, so the united states, it seems to me, is trying to provoke russia into making escalatory steps so that russia itself took the initiative to escalate something that would... scare the world majority away from it, but lavrov, it seems to me, made it very clear that this will not happen. yes, we will not allow red lines to be crossed, we will not allow escalation against us, including long-range strikes on internationally recognized russian territory, but at the same time we ourselves will not start such an escalation that could really turn the chessboard and snatch defeat from the hands of victory. now a little commercial, then we will continue. soviet counterintelligence has established that a foreign intelligence agent is operating in moscow,

the security officers only know the call sign of agent trianon. nagonii is on the verge of a coup, if agana overthrows grisso, the americans will immediately deploy their bases. the committee leadership expects the most decisive actions from us. please read this message , tell me if it looks like a forgery or not. you, vitaly. fly to louisburg immediately, we need to find the author of the letter, he is a kgb colonel, here under his own name, we impose on me every step of this slavin. it is necessary that the fleet was redeployed on the day and hour when we will begin our operation, which we called fakke. this kind of intensity of work is possible only on the eve of events. and here in africa, the russians are to blame for everything. we are only interfering in order to...

they hated him, he was incredibly charming with all his stories, fights, with boxing, running around, bullying, pushing, somehow aggressively behaving towards yulian semenov was not worth it, he could easily fight, guys, he really loved to make an impression, for example, to come there in a military in the form of nikolian partisans, talked to ordinary people, hello, comrade,

good evening. wanted to live an interesting, exciting life, violating the rules accepted at that time, he created it and lived it. crimea, yuliana semenova, on saturday, on the first. the main thing is what will happen after death, because everyone, alas, will have to die. so, if they continue to read me, then i won. there is a big game on the air, today the visit to china, to beijing, of the national security advisor to the president of the united states, jake sullivan, began. this is the first visit ever us national security advisor to beijing for 8 years, and jake salevan's first visit in this position and this visit is taking place at the invitation of a member of the cpc central committee and

the minister of foreign affairs. china one and both american and chinese sources say that this visit will last, firstly, 3 days, it will end on thursday, and jake salevan and ivan yi will talk for 10-12 hours, during which time, naturally, they will discuss the entire spectrum of us-chinese relations, issues on which the positions of the two sides clash, and where else cooperation remains, and the taiwan issue, the south china sea, and... strategic stability and issues of trade and economic relations and the restrictions that the united states is imposing against china, especially in the technological sphere, the situation in ukraine, the situation in the middle east, and so on and so forth and so forth, and as the new york times writes, even they can discuss a potential last meeting between xijing ping and joe biden before the latter leaves the white house, although

the question arises as to why this is necessary. dialogue, on the other hand, the united states has not relaxed its actions to contain and suppress china, constantly undermining the hard -won consensus of mutual trust between the two countries. the invitation to salevant to visit china reflects a responsible and constructive approach to china-us relations, since beijing, on the one hand, does not downplay the mutual difficulties and challenges, but on the other hand does not abandon the hope of efforts to stabilize relations, but to build a truly constructive

china-us relationship, it is not enough simply rely on consensus and willingness to stabilize relations between the two sides. there is a significant gap between the actions of the united states, their words and their stated desire to maintain stable american-chinese relations. that is, as i understand it, sergey gennadyevich, china is thereby making it clear that it is open to dialogue, it is open, among other things, to stabilizing american-chinese relations, but the ball is in the united states' court. is this so and what are beijing's expectations from these negotiations? indeed, this is so. a complex, difficult problem for both sides, but the point is that, as it were , the methodological, or the general political background - this is a rhetorical question, to which there is no answer yet, or rather there is an answer, a negative one, which was outlined at the san francisco conference otses on the sidelines of the fis meeting between xi and biden, whether a controlled mechanism or model of a conflict- based chinese-american model of bilateral relations has been created or not, a controlled confrontation, that

is, it is controlled or not controlled. and so the whole year, which, and this is the end of biden and jake sullivan, as if he flew in, well , to sum up in a sense everything that biden has done in four years, so to speak, figuratively speaking, we see that in fact... these military anti-chinese blocs of east asia and the trilateral usa, japan, korea, and aucus, and the philippine project and many others, the third point is very important, well, in fact, because the negotiations are beginning, well

, as i already said, against the backdrop of the end, so to speak, of biden, it is clear that if harris wins, she will continue, and trump threatens to raise imports by 60%, that is the anti-chinese agenda will be tough, the main question arises, trump? more precisely biden, he and how in general and him and his, so to speak, followed by harris, they will drive a wedge between russia and china at the expense of someone, everyone says: no, no, no, in no case, you will lose ukraine, you will lose the military alliances that have been created with such difficulty for 4 years, in no case, this means that, and if trump comes, yes, then a tough system, he will try to pull russia in, which is impossible in an anti-chinese word, but nevertheless no less, it is an alternative approach, that is. the first block is definitely the ukrainian track and a set of issues, a lot, well, including criticism of china for helping russia, the second is , of course, taiwan, the red lines, china

is presenting, this is all known, and 1.7 billion dollars of american military-industrial complex supplies to taiwan today. the third is , of course, the south china sea, the island disputes, china's intervention, the incitement of tensions with the philippines and others. the united states does not hide the fact that they will put pressure on china during these negotiations. this issue. the new york times published an article today, where it wrote that jake sullivan will try to put pressure on beijing to reduce the level of bilateral cooperation

between china and moscow. well, naturally, nothing will come of it. nevertheless, in anticipation of salevan's visit, the united states imposed not much-not a bit 46 or more precisely secondary sanctions against 46 chinese companies. but china itself also responded, the chinese foreign ministry issued a rather tough statement that beijing's position on the ukrainian conflict is clear and open, china for peace, the united states needs to stop using unilateral sanctions and extra territorial jurisdiction to try to force china to change its policy, that china will continue to protect its interests and rights, well, and today again, at the beginning of salevanna's visit, he made a statement:

it reacts to this by developing a technology for russian-chinese import-export operations through third countries, there are mechanisms, financial payments are being made, we know the results of letyan's visit and the prime minister of the state council

china and its 14 documents signed with mishustin and our other key ministers, including a colossal large one, on 64 projects for 162 billion dollars of investment. alternative swift transactions and others, that is, all this is like china's response to jake , a package plus interbank direct transactions, and to salevan in terms of threats or attempts. outside the brackets, but we understand perfectly well that china, as if distancing itself from the imposition of the military-strategic doctrine of the united states, is looking at russia, russia and china are not allies, but they definitely have, well so to speak, a military-strategic alliance, informal, but very effective, as a deterrent to the us, well, china has become a global power, a great power, and it... no longer refrains, not even

from criticism, but from direct instructions and recommendations on what the united states needs to do, in this same article in the global times, china is talking about what the united states needs to do to improve relations with china or at least stabilize them, and what jake salevan personally needs to do so that this visit becomes successful, let's listen, the us needs to fundamentally change its perception of china and its strategic... posture towards china, including politicizing and securitizing economic and trade issues, interfering in the south china sea issue, and obstructing normal bilateral exchanges through visas and other mechanisms. salevan, as the us national security advisor , must above all be a good listener if he is to achieve good results in strategic communication with china. andrey andreevich, first of all, will jake salevan listen to his urging? global times, secondly, from the american

perspective, what are the expectations for the prospects of this visit. please note that this same article says that the chinese side invited the national security adviser in order to define the agenda for this last period of the outgoing democratic administration, a possible new democratic administration, this cannot be ruled out, to outline the entire list of problematic and enough... such lingering, unresolvable issues that are brewing between the parties. the americans are not abandoning their line of containing and suppressing china. at the same time, they are not avoiding contact, interaction, an intensive process in which there are some positive steps - meetings of presidents, a large number of steps that greatly worsen the overall diplomatic situation, regular visits of politicians, congressmen to taiwan. the creation of bilateral, multilateral military coalitions

in the region, strengthening their military potential in this region, equipping its bases, its armed forces, with systems of destruction that could be anti-chinese in nature, creating city sensors in the east china sea, the south china sea, strengthening the armed forces in taiwan, all this indicates that the united states is taking seriously the scenario of military confrontation with the prc in the region and... at the moment, we have here, i think, now there is no quote from the military commander, the head of the joint chiefs of staff, but at the moment the united states is confident that the military advantage in east asia is still on their side, but they simultaneously see and even speak out on this account, that this advantage is gradually fading away, they indicate the time horizon when this advantage will be leveled, they call uh-huh. this is not only

china's construction of its own aircraft carrier strike groups, this is the improvement of its navy, which is significantly younger than the american navy, the creation of its own satellite group, new conceptual methods of conducting military operations, the americans historically, by conducting such an active, offensive, very high-intensity method of conflict interaction with a partner, they are trying not to miss the moment when china overtakes them. we cannot exclude that one of the tactical tricks of the american strategy may be to lure china into a situation in which it will be a strategic trap, to present the situation as if taiwan is weak, it is alone, there are no allies around it, and let us, therefore, support the guerrilla movement in taiwan, conditionally speaking, and such a scenario, which i believe, will not be... realistic and the chinese

military leaders, the military-political leadership will avoid it, it can, in the understanding of the united states, forestall this inevitable growth of china's military potential, before the moment comes when the united states will be confident that china is ahead of the american armed forces in east asia, a marker event here could be, for example, a strong strengthening of the nuclear potential of the chinese people's army republics. and its calendar plan is more or less known, it is the beginning of the thirties, that is, the creation of a containment situation between china and the united states, which will force the united states to think twice or three times before... taking any drastic steps, but nevertheless the situation now looks like a constant increase in mutual concern in terms of a military threat, the intention of the united states to unbalance china with sanctions, military coalitions, strengthening the military potential of allies, improving the rejuvenation of its fleet, and so on and so forth, but

i am convinced that the chinese leaders, like the russian leaders, understand the strengths of their strategy well and will not succumb to those tactical, perhaps, tricks, proposals that will be offered to the united states, well, they are no longer succumbing, i agree with you, for example, china has frozen the dialogue with the united states on missile and nuclear weapons and is not going to resume it for now, because the attempt by the united states to involve china in this dialogue while maintaining the general confrontational approach is precisely there is a trick, by the way, the united states is offering the same thing to russia, that is , the resumption of this dialogue, and on issues of strategic stability, and even arms control, this is one of the goals of salevan's visit, to create, to try to involve china in this trick, it is clear why the united states is interested in this, because china is really modernizing its nuclear

arsenal, at least the united states accuses it of this, the united states declares its intention to change its its own nuclear doctrine is precisely aimed at china, at china's development in the field of nuclear weapons, plus russian-chinese cooperation, plus north korea, plus potentially iran, but the modernization of american nuclear weapons themselves, so to speak, raises very big doubts, it is very expensive, and it is unclear when all this will happen, here is a rather interesting article published by the wall street journal about how much it costs... and at what pace, for example, the replacement of obsolete ones is being implemented, and here is an ugly america's aging , silo-based minuteman intercontinental ballistic missiles with newer, more advanced sentinel missiles. let 's hear it. after revising the projected

cost of upgrading hundreds of pentagon nuclear missiles, shah raised the figure to $141 billion, up $30 billion from the. the air force's plan, known as sentinel, unveiled in january, would replace the cold war-era intercontinental ballistic missiles in the silos with a newer model. military leaders recently told residents of kimball, nebraska, near one of the world's largest missile test sites, that work could be five years or more away. sentinel is part of a long-delayed nuclear weapons modernization that the congressional budget office estimates will cost at least $1.5 billion over the next 30 years, with the missiles in about 450 silos extending beyond their projected lifespans. service for a decade. well, it seems to me, from here it is clear, alexey petrovich, why the united states wants to involve china in such a dialogue,

because china is modernizing, russia has already modernized, and the united states, well , the united states has a plan b, that is , biden announced it, to which he us.

there is a very small point, a very small nuance: what will this missile be stuffed with? in 2020 , the w80 warheads for cruise missiles disappeared from the development program. sea-based air-launched, the americans said, we are abandoning this case, well, like such a gesture, in fact , these heads, but already in the wv84 version, will be

used as equipment for these medium -range missiles, that is, in fact, the americans can build a fence, as they believe, and if some global showdown begins, then the territories of europe and the territories of the asia-pacific region, where these missiles will be deployed, will be sacrificed, this is what they are counting on, really... here, too, a nuance arises, because both russia and china say that of course, we will respond, but including in those places where this decision was made, for sure, because the missiles of the united states deployed in europe and asia are not tactical but strategic for russia. let's return to what sergey viktorovich lavrov was talking about, from russia's point of view the concept of a regional nuclear war that would not affect the united states is impossible, and accordingly, the united states will not succeed in achieving strategic superiority over russia, and china will certainly not fall into the trap that jake salvan is now trying to set for it. a little advertising,

then we will continue. yuliy borisovich khariton, i know what bombs were dropped on japan, wrote a technical assignment in which he says that we will work on two types of bombs. trommer asked when the soviet union would be able to create an atomic bomb, opingerju thought and said: "it's hard for me to name a time frame." trummer said: "and i know when, never." the creation of nuclear weapons required a gigantic concentration of forces. this was something new that had to be created in the shortest possible time. everyone was under great tension. there were 10, 9 left. i have a special there was no concern, in fact, the creation

of the first product rds-1 is a warning of the third world war completely unknown to humanity. atomic bomb, personal matter of person x. premiere. on sunday on the first. and then such a disaster happened. the program. fake from the first channel closed. during the time that our program was not on the air, viewers wrote to us on the channel, called, and ill-wisher spread all sorts of fakes about us. we expanded our program, and geography, and history, and what we will review here, to me also they ask me to comment on where the truth is in the turkish media or in the russian media, well, and here the antifake program always helps me. this season, you will find a huge number of new, interesting sections. this is a symbol of the fact that historical justice is being restored, women are most often subject to anxiety when they receive some messages always wants to say,

mom, let's not panic, a new season of the antifake program, a new rule, now i will personally go to the site to check the information together with you, antifake, season premiere from september 2 on weekdays on the first. on air is a big game. in the middle east and around the world they continue to guess whether there will be a big war between israel and hezbollah or not. on the one hand, there were positive trends, there was a limited exchange of blows, and hassan nasrallah, the leader of hezbollah , said that this organization is not interested in further escalation. retribution for the murder of commander fuad shukr by israel took place, that's it, now we can stop. but, apparently, it is too early to breathe out, here is the bloomberg publication published some rather alarming, alarming

statistics, according to which not only netanyahu himself, but also israeli society wants a big war with hezbollah. let's listen. the vast majority of israelis say they want a ceasefire agreement to bring back the remaining luzhniki in gaza alive. since the negotiations seem to have reached a dead end, and the risk of another war is higher than ever, one might assume that benjamin netanyahu may have political problems, but this is far from the case. according to a poll conducted by the agency lazar, netanyahu's approval ratings are rising again this month, overtaking opposition leader benny gantt for the first time since the conflict began as the person best placed to lead israel. asked by the israel democracy institute whether people want their country to spread the war to hezbollah in lebanon, the answer is basically.

if something is happening somewhere similar, israel has a chance to take action against the backdrop of the americans' very large presence in the region , it could be much more difficult in the future. compared to what we have today. the second very important point, of course, against the backdrop of what happened a year ago, in fact, yes, in october, the israeli population

is quite determined, militant, this is understandable. what happened, although, of course, we need to ask internal questions, how did it happen, but this is probably later, the other side of the coin, of course, there was an imbalance in the regional subsystem of international relations, a lot of things that were impossible are becoming possible, a lot of things that were simply impossible imagine what is happening on earth today, what i mean is, well, for example, that in fact it was israel that initiated and wanted to initiate these... military actions, all the arab countries and countries in the region, not only the arab ones, and iran, of course, and turkey, showed tolerance, albeit harshly, harshly assessing the actions of israel, but showed restraint, understanding what consequences a large regional war could lead to, this is something that has changed radically since the cold war, which is also very important, this is what, of course, nasrola stated that

the goals, so to speak, of retribution have been partially achieved, but after all... it was said that there will be a second act, a third act, and here we must understand that the second third act may not only be from hezbollah, it may of course be from iran, which the iranian leadership clearly states, the iranian leadership states that it is not afraid of escalation, but at the same time it does not want, does not desire escalation, but at the same time it will definitely answer for what happened, so of course there will be an act of retaliation from iran, this is important. and of course here we need to take into account that what the hezbollah leaders also spoke about, that there may be a corresponding response from yemen too, in this regard the region has the potential, unfortunately, to increase this conflict, which ultimately can lead to irreparable consequences, what they do not understand, including the israeli

leadership, fueling the conflict further, that this can...

it turns out that israel is not only against hezbollah, it is against lebanon, is against the kushites, against iran, which all this time has been establishing the production of modern types of weapons, long-range drones, missiles, including hypersonic ones, which cannot install the iron dome, that is, it is climbing, israel is climbing into the lion's mouth, thinking that the trainer who used to crack the whip and build the entire middle east will help it with this, and the lion will not ...

that one of the asymmetric responses to the escalation on the part of the west in ukraine could be the transfer of our weapons, including high-precision, the enemy in the united states in many regions, the united states needs a big war. between israel and hezbollah, especially lebanon, where they can get involved right now, or rather israel will try to get them involved right before the elections in the united states. a year ago, jake salevan, speaking at a conference, talked about the middle east as one of the most peaceful regions of the world, he did not say this, but he wrote this in an article in foreign affairs, the written printed version had already been published, handed over for circulation, and then in the electronic version they had to urgently, so to speak, change the content. he spoke orally on the same subject at one of the universities, commenting on the state of affairs in the region, and he boasted about the achievements of american strategy, that this is the most peaceful place in the last 20 years, that is an incredible success, the countries of the region are getting closer, there are

constant negotiations, just shortly before this bloody denouement in palestine, in the gaza strip, for the americans what is happening is a significant difficulty, of course, they are not only confronted with... with irreconcilable and an uncompromising partner, an ally to israel, in the person of israel, this netanyahu government is pursuing a rather uncompromising line, which, in essence, is like an inflationary bubble or some kind of financial pyramid, it works as long as it gives a positive result, here netanyahu presents the operation in gaza to the americans as a success, we have reduced the potential of this group for a long time, it will not be able to attack in the next 10 years, let's say, the americans are forced to support their ally, they supply a large volume of weapons, american weapons are generally used to solve many of these problems. now , i believe, a similar kind of marketing is being done in relation

to the operation, a possible operation against hezbollah in lebanon. well, sergey gennadyevich, you said that the middle east story will be one of the subjects of discussion between jake sullivan and wang yi. indeed, the interests of china and the united states, well, to put it mildly, do not coincide in the middle east, and one of the main interests of the united states is to weaken china's position in this region, but, but many emphasize that despite all these differences in interests, both washington and beijing are not interested in a major war in the middle east that would involve israel and the united states and iran, and moreover, many in the united states even said that beijing should be asked to put pressure on iran so that iran does not respond too strongly to the israeli one. the chinese strategy, despite its alternative to american approaches, in particular the well-known american-israeli plan and others, is objectively aimed at

maintaining systemic peace in the big near in the east, this is connected with the motivation of one belt, one road, this is connected with the contribution that china has already made to the iranian-saudi reconciliation, it accepted 14... palestinian groups successfully, there are many other groundworks, and especially relations with iran, all this is certainly taken into account in washington, but the reality is that for now the plan of china, and russia to create a palestinian state is a voice crying out, well, in the un there in the security council or in the desert, that is, in fact, the reality of the middle east is a constantly escalating a cauldron where the us is adding spices and god forbid this cauldron explodes and tears the whole thing apart. well, of course, russia and china, they are really interested in peace in the middle east and are doing everything they can to achieve it. it was a big game, goodbye, see you tomorrow.