the less you know, the better you sleep, this is exactly the approach in the us: people know practically nothing about what is happening in the world, in fact, no one is interested in it, at first, when the special military operation began, it was presented as an invasion of ukraine, and many americans hung out ukrainian flags then, we spoke for ukraine, but... 2 years have passed, everyone has already forgotten about it,

our american media, they do not inform society objectively about what is really happening, everything is tied to politics, this very similar to what the newspaper pravda did in the soviet union, now the western media have turned into the newspaper pravda, so i think it is very important that russians understand this.

and america under biden to talk to us, so we are very very grateful to you and we simply respect your courage i hope that everything will be fine with you, i hope that we will see you again soon on our program, thank you very much, we are going to commercial and will be back in just a few minutes, thank you, ukrainians. boris johnson. you are the person, which played a big role in ukraine continuing to fight instead of negotiating with putin. i am proud that great britain helped at the decisive moment. it was a decision, of course, in washington. they needed to defeat russia, and better yet, on the battlefield. that is why, in fact, there was a negotiation process. we support the ukrainians, and we must help them to demolish.

we will accept them into nato and thus make our own springboard there for the fight against russia. that is all. premiere, vavan and lexus show. today on the first. on air is the big game. and now we very briefly discuss the situation we are in today.

well, as far as i remember, and i remember that time well, still did not set myself the task of destroying the soviet union, that is, if it happens, not bad, but in general , the main task that the west initially set was to oust the soviet union from eastern europe, which in the soviet union with full justification, occupied after forty-fifth year, therefore, to a large extent for them, by the way, the collapse of the soviet union was a surprise, which they of course.

the east is becoming the world center, it is impossible to stop it, it is obvious that china is the workshop of the world, india is apparently the second workshop of the world, and we see what this is leading to, factories in germany are closing, that is, the west is losing its technological

advantage, it is obvious that in any case russia would go to the east, whether there was a conflict or not, it would simply be a longer process, but for the west it is completely unacceptable if... having these technologically powerful centers, this is the center of the world, and russia with its resources, then for the west this is obviously the end in general, it goes there to the bottom, it of course remains, but it loses all its opportunities, therefore in fact this war is for russia, so that it does not go away, it must be destroyed, it cannot in any form, if russia remains as it is, it will still be sovereign, it will still rise, it will still have its own opinion, it will still go to the east, for this purpose the destruction of russia is precisely, such a goal during the cold war was still the west in my opinion, he didn't. koringelovich, thank you very much, general, yes, i am saying that

the west's goal is the destruction of russia, because of this goal russia is getting closer, is actively moving closer to the east. the eastern european line was the front line during the cold war, they couldn't directly actively, i , as an intelligence officer, a thirty-six-year-old, they couldn't fight, act like that to destroy russia, without overcoming this line of defense. remember, we once had a conversation, i told how we tried to convince that it was impossible to leave the line front, as soon as we leave.

how the south turned to us, how the east turned to us, unexpected countries, even saudi arabia, well, for us it was expected, well, for the general public it was unexpected, everyone turned to us, russia raised this banner, so why is it turning, i would still say that deep down it is our attitude to preserve our traditions.

talking about military goals, so the military goals of the west today remain testing new models of weapons systems and those they have... therefore, i absolutely do not exclude that these jasmas with not only a range of up to 300 km, but maybe a range of 980 km, will get to ukraine, this is very important to them, they need to understand how the best air defense system in the world, the air defense system of the russian federation will fight them, because i want to remind you, after all, they have... one of the strategic operations, which implies a global

disarming strike, not by nuclear means , against objects of the russian federation, for this they need to test how these means will work, they will continue to do this, moreover, the current administration of the united states, colleagues also talked about this, i agree with them, is absolutely unpredictable, because... they have lost their sense of reality, they live in a world they have invented, in which they see nothing but themselves and think that they mean something, no, they no longer mean anything, including, apparently, soon for their own population, and those normal forces on the planet, they understand all this perfectly well, we need not just to turn to the east economically, we need to turn to the east militarily component. because the united states is also across the ocean, there is no european

layer, there they are, please, the american coast, you can do with them whatever you want, we have the means for this, in ukraine we will finish everything as our supreme commander-in-chief set the task. and on this we will finish our conversation today, it seems to me that all the most important things have been said. thank you. it was a big game, we will meet tomorrow on air. he considered himself a russophile and admired russian culture. he stated that hillary clinton - nurse of the entire hospital, and barack obama partially. streets in ukrainian cities, and

most importantly, he forced zelensky to fight to the last ukrainian. revelation of probably the most eccentric politician of our time, former prime minister of great britain boris johnson. watch the show of vavan and lexus. today in our studio is british journalist mike jones, director of the institute of political studies, political scientist sergey markov, director of the institute of current international problems of the diplomatic academy of mit of russia, alexander kormarenko, and journalist and tv presenter alexander gurnov. friends, hello, let's get started. ukrainian mp arakhamia said that boris johnson forced ukraine to continue military action against russia, although boris johnson later denied this, we called him on

the topic of memories of the already deceased henry kesenger, on behalf of jacques athalie, former adviser to french president méterand, and a well-known economist, that's what the conversation was about. he said that you are the person who played a big role in that, that ukraine has continued to fight instead of negotiating with putin. that britain has continued to help, they are fighting for us, i think they are fighting for

freedom everywhere, and i am so glad that now we are supporting them even more, i think that by the way, in your country, in your own government in france, there is actually an example of this, an example of the attitude that has changed so much, i mean, just a few years ago, emman was saying that nato was brain dead, now he is saying that nato should be more involved, helping ukraine, it's amazing. in the past , president macron was my student. i think i knew that, ask him, yes, he spoke very highly of me, but i don't meet him that often, and sometimes i advise him to react correctly to some things, really, great, he couldn't have had a better teacher, it's very, very good, and i think

he's strong in this matter now, i'm glad to see that.

you hear that this man is proud of the fact that he called for war, how do you feel about that at all? when he says that he proud that he supports ukraine, boris johnson is here, he will say what is required of him to say, this is what he thinks is in his interests, so he will talk about it, he will support his career, in fact he approved of it, made it so that more people died than...

illegal, anti-democratic and terrorist, and it is not led by the british, all the key decisions are made by the americans, it was not boris johnson's decision, but he was the propagandist of this decision, he thinks his career, and what he's so cool, under his influence the americans made a decision, everyone understands

that the americans, there 's another point here, yes, he's a russophile in life, he's there... he reads russian literature , watches all sorts of movies, and russians participate, yes-yes-yes-yes , he's such a russophile and being a russophile he does nasty things, no doubt, and great russia and this scoundrel in the forest participates in the ban on the liquidation of the russian language, which he studied, reads russian literature, it's this ukrainian neo-fascist junta that bans russians from writing.

with great success, sometimes he even visited, but the thing is that it was a decision, of course in washington, of those who stood, well, if not biden, then behind biden, they needed to defeat russia, and the best on the battlefield, this is the opportunity they cherished, so in fact there was a bilateral negotiation process in istanbul, and johnson was simply an emissary of the americans or the anglo-saxons or the west as a whole, if you like. i would like to add a little more, he has an almost psychopathic ability to switch.

now it's not the middle class that suffers from this, but they don't care, and what do you think, he has the lowest rating as an opposition leader who has ever been elected to government, that is, he was so terrible, boris johnson for the british reputation, that what came after him, generally overshadowed all his strange, eccentric, unusual behavior, that is , people like rish sunok. for example, imagine him, he caused even more frustration among the british, they could not look at him, and boris johnson was practically forgotten at that moment, because

that he was overshadowed, simply, even overshadowed by the parliament, again he emerges as a float in kiev, and this is strange, because he did not represent the government then, this is strange, well this was his last chance to stay afloat, in general, let's also remember the skripal case. after all, at that time he held the post of minister of foreign affairs expelled diplomats, one of the first russian ones. stianper is deeply convinced that the story with the skripals was played out by boris johnson precisely in order to distract the british, and for quite a long time from brexit, from seriously thinking about this scam that they had conceived and that boris johnson pushed in every possible way as foreign secretary, because you remember that the thesis was: russia attacked great britain with chemical weapons,

weapons of mass destruction, well, naturally, for english households, for decent english people it sounded terrible, it all fell out on the front page of the newspapers, as a result, brexit was pushed through, and i think that was done intentionally, because the idea that has been very important to the english establishment for a very long time, uh, maybe even centuries, and which has again prevailed in the ruling class today, is to try, sitting on an island, to start wars, to pit people, countries on the continent against each other, and in this way to restore england to its former greatness, boris johnson several times...

let's, let's make a new military bloc together. mike, tell me, the most ridiculous moments in the career of boris johnson. when did boris johnson ever become part of the common knowledge, the common information, it was on a comedy show, that 's how he was chosen, just through the show, that is, he first appeared on the show, and then became a political object, he was always an object of fun at first, yes, a comedian, a jester. a failure, in fact, an incompetent leader of the country, probably one of the worst leaders, he is destroying the country, he was destroying, that is, that is, an excellent analogy,

the most, probably, the worst, the most terrible, it's hard to choose now, there are a lot of options, but i think that now many can remember, remember these punjis, these are literally on elastic bands, some flags that literally stick out of him, that is... he is a walking joke, you can call him that, and i think that all this hair is combed like this, it is not clear, they must support this idea, some psychologists may say, look, johnson wants the opposition to just think that he is such an idiot, a fool, but some people, the majority, with whom i speak, they know, no, he is just a pure natural idiot, yes, he is a lying idiot, but he he lies, he likes it, well, such a buffoon, a buffoon, a real buffoon, as we can say in english, mike, you know, one of ethan's teachers, also these are schools, this is not even a university, when someone said,

called him a buffoon, like you, yeah, that... said: you'll find out about this guy, he realized too early how convenient it is to pretend to be a fool in order to achieve his goals, he started playing this role back in school. we had footage here showing how he got stuck on a cable car, i think he even enjoys it when he gets into such situations, yes, he was then mayor of london, they were opening some kind of amusement park, he decided to try how it works, how can you manage to get into such situations, you want to do it on purpose, you can't? already despite his eccentric behavior, he lasted for so many years and still holds on in international politics, there it's a sheet once, he leaves, yes, the decision-makers are also a stigma on them, there are some kind of idiots, and even the leaders recognized him, we just saw footage of him riding a bicycle there, please , everyone, that is, somehow with him it was considered that ho accepted recently literally a few days ago, when there was a congress, he came and talked with trump, they started talking about the clagunada, maria zakharova formulated it for boris johnson, remember

when... this is a person who says one thing, thinks another, does a third and this cannot be attributed to classical politics, a classical political career, in the western liberal system, here everything is much deeper, here there is still such a mix-up connected with our country, that a person who positioned himself for many years as special, as

he is... a friend of russia, a russophile, an expert on russian culture, art, literature, a man who quoted russian classics, in fact, i always emphasize that his name was given to him, so to speak, also in connection with our country, that is, this is a man who did everything to convince of his, well, i can’t say pro-russian views, but russophile ones for sure, in fact, everything turned out to be exactly the opposite, i don’t know how he lives with this dualism, with, as he said, the russian name boris from russian classics with a desire, well, so or else it was verbalized in your program by another anglo-saxon john bush jr., to kill as many russians as possible, this is obvious, because what boris johnson did cannot be called anything else, this is the incitement of conflict, this is the endless machinations on ukrainian territory with ukrainian politicians about...

what does a hypocritical person mean? yes, it is bad, hypocrisy, but you can get rid of it, you can work on it, for some it is unconscious, someone simply does not understand that he is being hypocritical, for someone it is the only a way of survival, yes, and that is, there may be nuances and play, here is an absolutely clear, cold logic of destruction, the logic of infliction.

as the anglo-saxons formulate a strategic defeat in our country, but exactly for one thing, in order to stay afloat, just the other day i read that britain flew out of the top ten leading industrial countries, it was bypassed, including russia and other countries, this is a colossal blow to prestige, to image, to self-love, i would say, have they can correct them, their own feeling themselves in the universe. no, because they understand perfectly well that you can order any other rating, any other review or public opinion poll, but you can't fix reality without making an effort, they don't like to make an effort, and the sources of direct pumping of funds, direct exploitation of this, so to speak, colonial mentality have ended, you need to spin, you need to twirl, you need to give specific

results, and they... there is no britain, the second point, you can already see how the last, well, let's call it that, for 5 years the topic of space has been activated at a new level, the exploration of space, new systems that are launched into space, civil infrastructure, for someone, and this is the arena of the future, military confrontation, here you have economic operators, and private business, and the state, well, and tourism and cinema, and in general, everyone has their own way, where is britain here, there is no smell of britain here, britain missed its historical chance to become a space power, yes, of course, they can get hooked on other people's ships, they can demonstrate brandson with his, so to speak, some technological capabilities, they can sponsor something, but they will never become a great space power, this is a colossal blow, and in all, this is not

only self-love and self-determination, it is not only technologies and so on, this is a whole class of the future, and in this sense it does not exist in britain, there is no space future in this country... no, i only showed you two parameters, yes, endless theft of other people's assets, but it also speaks of a lot, about that we need sources of replenishment of the treasury, traditions, by the way, which are so sacredly revered, they are in words, and in fact have turned into trash, that very symbol of britain, in the form of the british monarchy, the english monarchy, i don’t know how, how to say it correctly now, it has simply shrunk to some level, you know...

and boris johnson and many of his comrades in the party, and from another party, in general, there are many who want, so to speak, to prove themselves on the neva usakhobi, so when we talk about the british and the english, we need to understand one thing, that all this not just for... ideology, it's pragmatics, it's pure calculation, they are bringing down the european union in every sense, they are setting the post-soviet space against each other for the sake of only one thing, for their own benefit , in order to keep themselves afloat by any means,

to get benefits. well, what does boris johnson think about the introduction of french troops into ukraine, we will find out right after the commercial. russian. tank and russian crew - this is power, the tank worked the enemy, battered, battered, it will be easier for the infantry to go there, the enemy tanks, they are already like that, our pierces them right through, the second tank flew apart , the ukrainian one, i got goosebumps, come on, bro, come on, drag, shadows, handsome, our doll, each machine in its own way, she's alive, he saved me, his armor. thank you, savior, we are descendants, people-pedophiles, it's impossible to break us, tankers, then and now, strong, armor-headed, my dad is strong, brave, not just as a person, an ordinary one, he's

a real hero, for tanker's day, special report, premiere, on sunday on channel one.

i kind of agree with henry, but i think that there must be a clear, forgive me, a clear invitation to ukraine. because the prospect of nato membership, i think, is now something that will help promote peace, not provoke putin, the ultimate goal should now be. provided that there will be

a security guarantee from nato. i think zelensky would agree, would accept the loss of donbas and crimea, but can he do it now? i doubt it, i think any negotiations are possible, but i'm afraid the precondition should be the defeat of russia, ukrainians should have some sense of victory, because... the meaning, and i think that when we find out about this,

we will laugh, how they treated ukraine, how they treated all this, the masquerade, you can’t even call it a ball, which is called the ukrainian political elite, how they treated, alas, the ukrainian people, that’s how they treat it, they just don’t publicly demonstrate it, but they use it as a tool for solving their geostrategic economic problems, and geostrategic problems...

well, it's something like stockholm syndrome,

it's a category in psychology, philosophy, sociology, people who begin to literally deify tyrants who enslaved them, who mocked them, who experimented on them, i can give many examples, at some point, a film that was very much loved by many as such... historical events of modern europe, when people who were captured by terrorists threatened to kill them, and then defended these same terrorists and acted as witnesses in defense of those who literally promised to blow them up and so on, you understand, this is the first sign of suppression of personality, suppression of consciousness, pressure on critical thinking, and what is happening to

the citizens of ukraine, to the people of ukraine, but we see all this perfectly well, they say white to black, they talk about how they created everything on this planet, and they read textbooks that were written under dictation only in order to knock them off the normal path , to sow complete chaos in their heads, therefore, of course, the first person they will install monuments, those who carried out the most terrible experiment on them, it would be okay if it was just another monument in the alley of monuments, yes, there were different monuments, here 's another one, after all, they...

erected monuments to other americans in the same kosovo, yes, these are people who, in general, inflicted such terrible damage on the region, but at least there you can understand some logic, but here there is no logic, except for the one i mentioned, the suppression of ukrainians' own critical thinking. thank you for being with us, it was official representative of the metrosia maria zakharova, we continue, what do you think of his statement that it is still possible to sacrifice donbass and crimea, what is that? this is an expression of a decision that has already been made, i will say frankly, so they had several, at first they believed that they would make a big afghanistan out of ukraine for russia, yes, so that there would be an eternal guerrilla war there, there and so on. then they came up with a second concept:

to defeat russia on the front line, they concentrated a huge army, well, they started an offensive, well... we, so to speak, were able to disrupt the offensive of this, yes, after that they have now developed another concept of how to get out, so to speak, of this situation, especially since the americans need a truce for the elections, the fact is that according to sociology , 83% of americans consider the current war in ukraine to be a hybrid war between america and russia, which has the threat of escalating into a nuclear war and the complete destruction of the american people and the russian...

or what kind of truce to offer, while they want us to recognize that ukraine can join nato, these are the territories, which are de facto controlled by the ukrainians, that's it, this plan has been developed, they wanted to make all of ukraine their huge military bases, now they realized that this won't work, so it arose: let's give up crimea, they want something to remain from ukraine, we'll accept this into nato, and so we'll make our own hearth there, our own bridgehead.

agreements, that is, we don't need a truce, we need a peace treaty, we need a real peace with recognition of new borders, well, in general, i think that what he said now about ukraine's membership in nato, it says that in in general, he is a reasonable person, there is no doubt about it, if he said that they could agree to the return of crimea and donbass there before february 24, twenty-second, now it is difficult for them, because... the situation has changed on the contact line, so they have to fight, because there is no plan b, they have to fight in the hope that something will work out, when they were told at the vilnius summit: you have been given everything, fight, and you promised, they probably promised that we would win, remember, on the eve of

february 24 they declared on every corner that they have the strongest armies in europe, that is , they offered themselves to be a frontline state, to be on the sidelines of russian western policy, they received money, weapons, and they rearmed, they were strengthened in all respects, they really promised victory, so somewhere behind the scenes they are being asked where it is, so now the scapegoat will be ukraine itself, and the kiev authorities will say, it is their own fault, macron recently announced that he is allowing french troops into ukraine, naturally, there were some countries that supported it, poland and britain, and what does boris johnson think about it, let's hear it, my student. said that france could send military groups into ukraine, that could lead to an escalation of the conflict, to a second or third

world war, what do you think? look, i'm as ardent a supporter of ukraine as you can imagine, and i often wish i was gifted in military affairs, so that i... i don't have that training, but i have to say, i think henry was right on that, because i think it would escalate the situation, i'm sad to say, i think we're already involved, we're supporting the ukrainians, but the reality is, and it's a terrible tragedy, but the ukrainians are fighting for us, and

i think the minute we publicly introduce our forces, our own troops, into their territory, it becomes a different category, a completely different category of conflict, the consequences are hard to predict. but that possibility remains, right? that possibility exists. i think, as emmanuel macron said, all options should be on the table table, but i have to say, i think it would be, well i usually have a very high healthy appetite for risk, but i think it would take this conflict to a new level. and we don't need to do that. they haven't had a mass mobilization yet.

escalation, which is not in the interests of the west. i think that's kind of the main thing, the second point that is being played out by the west right now is that we need to mobilize. people 18 years old, at least, why are they throwing into the fire people who had experience of soviet dormitory life, of existence in the soviet union, i

i am sure that the kiev regime itself wanted the youth who had gone through indoctrination with aggressive nationalism, nazism and the like, rewriting history in the interests of creating a myth of some great ukraine, to which everyone is indebted, that is, they wanted to start. then everything from scratch, with the youth, and those people are simply thrown into the furnace, now the west, since for it any alternative, even the appearance of some agreements or big deals, as they say with russia, is simply prohibitive, so it should be expected that after all, ukraine will start mobilizing people from 18 years old, will it blow up ukraine or not, or will a reserve army be created , maybe from among all those who emigrated, these military registration and enlistment offices will be deployed on the territory of foreign countries where there are men, and not

only men, ukrainians who fled from the war, so i think, from what he says, we can fully assume that such a prospect is real, here is what boris said, firstly, i am right that he admitted that he cannot be a general, because... he understands that the destruction of the kerch bridge did not affect the course of the svo at all. he says: the ukrainians are fighting for us, for what, for what? if he now starts talking about democracy again, no, it is the same country he is talking about, it is blocking citx, it is the same country, great britain, which prohibits people in great britain from going out on the streets. to protest, to discuss what is happening inside the country now, again about fighter johnson,

why is he not a player in all this, in that i mean, no one... will talk about him on camera now, we can see 20 people on the street in great britain who will still be afraid to say something on camera that contradicts the government's agenda, because if you say something against the government, you can go to prison, you most likely will, roughly speaking, this is the very democracy for which... ukrainians must die are dying today. well , we will learn about boris johnson's new political plans right after the commercial. anti-shake. today on the first. i became victim of scammers. florisa dolina had to endure a lot.

very sophisticated and planned fraudulent actions were committed against me. i wipe away tears and move on, i wipe away tears and move on. our exclusive today: life lessons from larisa dolina, the iron lady of the russian stage, as her colleagues call her, the child is 3 days old, well, here i decided to steal her get rid of her. exclusive with dmitry borisov. premiere on saturday on channel one. this is

the vavan and lexus show and we continue. many people said, uh, at least on the internet about that boris johnson is similar to one of our fairy-tale characters, to whom you have some associations, this same spirit, some brownie, yes, because he is so curly, this is from a cartoon, i think, like a brownie where the wood goblin is, we decided to say that supposedly gennary kissenger confessed to jacquatali before his death about boris johnson. said, as he so sweetly, kindly calls him, and decided to tell boris this little secret, funny, you know, as henry called you in our personal conversation, he called you very tenderly, boris, i think, eh, no, he called you very tenderly, i don't know why,

brownie kuzya. he lived a damn good 100 years, and i hope that you have a great chance to return as head of state to the post of prime minister. it would be unconstitutional, but yes, i really don't rule it out. he has two russian names, he is boris alexander, in fact, now also

kuzya, well, it's really funny. it seems to me, in order to better understand boris johnson, it is worth remembering that he was at oxford, when he was studying, yes, he was a member of the so-called bullington club, yes, it is a club, such an elite group, such a gang, such a golden boys inside the university, what is called the children of the rich, that is, who are engaged in hooliganism, they...

as far as i remember, when tucker carlson wanted to interview her, he asked for a million dollars, and you? look, here it was important to create a legend and a legend that would interest johnson himself.

if this was a call from some zelensky or someone else, he would hardly be interested in talking to a politician, but here it was zhakatali, he really respects him as a representative of the globalists, those people who have not yet been written off and who can then accept him into their club, so he agreed to this conversation, we asked our british colleagues to conduct a survey on the streets of london, what they think about boris johnson, here, in fact, is what happened, let's see what you think about boris johnson, inadequate, would you like him return, no, definitely not, he chose to be a liar, he chose to be.

i found out this morning that immigration has dropped by 82% and that's because of brexit. and boris johnson was the main reason for brexit because he lied to the british public. there's something about his nature that makes him not a very good leader. his tenure as prime minister was a disaster. i think he's been a great disgrace, especially the way he and his cabinet have handled covid. would you want him back in certain circumstances? to me, i think all politicians are the same, so you know, ultimately you just

pick the best of the bad.